cavity solitons in semiconductor microcavities
DESCRIPTION
Cavity solitons in semiconductor microcavities. Luigi A. Lugiato. INFM, Dipartimento di Scienze, Università dell'Insubria, Como, Italy [email protected]. Collaborators: Giovanna Tissoni, Reza Kheradmand INFM, Dipartimento di Scienze, Università dell'Insubria, Como, Italy - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Cavity solitons in semiconductormicrocavities
Luigi A. LugiatoINFM, Dipartimento di Scienze, Università dell'Insubria, Como, Italy
Collaborators:Giovanna Tissoni, Reza KheradmandINFM, Dipartimento di Scienze, Università dell'Insubria, Como, ItalyJorge Tredicce, Massimo Giudici, Stephane BarlandInstitut Non Lineaire de Nice, FranceMassimo Brambilla, Tommaso MaggipintoINFM, Dipartimento di Fisica Interateneo, Università e Politecnico di Bari, Italy
MENUWhat are cavity solitons and why are they interesting?
The experiment at INLN (Nice):
First experimental demonstration of CS insemiconductors microcavities
“Tailored” numerical simulations steering the experiment
Thermally induced and guided motion of CS in presence of phase/amplitude gradients: numerical simulations
Solitons in propagation problems
Temporal Solitons: no dispersion broadening
z
“Temporal” NLSE: 02
22
tuuu
zui
dispersionpropagation
Solitons are localized waves that propagate (in nonlinear media) without change of form
Spatial Solitons: no diffraction broadening
“Spatial” NLSE:
02
22
xuuu
zui 1D
02
2
2
22
yu
xuuu
zui 2D
x
y
z diffraction
Input
Nonlinear Medium
nl
Cavity Output(Plane Wave) (Pattern)
Nonlinear Medium
nl
Nonlinear media in cavities
Hexagons Honeycomb Rolls
Optical Pattern Formation
Diffraction in the paraxialapproximation:
2
2
2
22
yx
022
injuiuuiuutui
diffractiondissipation
“Dissipative” NLSE:
Kerr medium in cavity.Lugiato Lefever, PRL 58, 2209 (1987).
1 1
1 1
1
0
00
0
Encoding a binary number in a 2D pattern??
Problem: different peaks of the pattern are strongly correlated
Spatial structures concentrated in a relatively small regionof an extended system, created by stable fronts connecting
two spatial structures coexisting in the system
Solution: Localised Structures
1D case
Localised Structures Tlidi, Mandel, Lefever
In
tens
ity
x y
CAVITY SOLITONS
Cavity solitons persist after the passage of the pulse, and their position can be controlled by appropriate phase and amplitude gradients in the holding field
Phase profile
Intensity profileIn a semiconductor microcavity: Brambilla, Lugiato, Prati, Spinelli, Firth,
Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2042 (1997).
Nonlinear medium nl
Holding beam Output field
Writingpulses
Possible applications:realisation of reconfigurablesoliton matrices, serial/parallelconverters, etc
Cavity Solitons
Cavity
Mean field limit: field is assumed uniform along the cavity (along z)
CS height, width, number and interaction properties do not depend directly on the total energy of the system
Dissipation
Non-propagative problem: CS profiles
Inte
nsity
x y x
y
Cavity Solitons are individual entities, independent from one another
What are the mechanisms responsible for CS formation?
AbsorptionCS as Optical Bullet Holes (OBH):the pulse locally creates a bleached
area where the material is transparent
Interplay between cavitydetuning and diffraction
At the soliton peak the system is closer to resonance with the cavity
Refractive effectsSelf-focusing action of the material:
the nonlinearity counteracts diffraction broadening
Long-Term Research Project PIANOS
Processing of Information with Arrays of Nonlinear Optical Solitons
France Telecom, Bagneux (Kuszelewicz, now LPN, Marcoussis )PTB, Braunschweig (Weiss, Taranenko)INLN, Nice (Tredicce)University of Ulm (Knoedl)Strathclyde University, Glasgow (Firth)INFM, Como + Bari, (Lugiato, Brambilla)
1999-2001
Nature 419, 699 (2002)
The experiment at INLN (Nice) and its theoretical interpretation
was published in
Tunable Laser
CCD
Holding beam
Writing beam
Detector linear array
VCSEL
BS
BS BS
BS
aom
aom
C
L L
L L
C
M M
Experimental Set-upS. Barland, M. Giudici and J. Tredicce, Institut Non-lineaire de Nice (INLN)
BS: beam splitter, C: collimator, L: lens, aom: acousto-optic modulator
Active layer (MQW)
E R
Bottom Emitter (150m)
Features1) Current crowding at borders (not critical for CS)2) Cavity resonance detuning (x,y)3) Cavity resonance roughness (layer jumps) See R.Kuszelewicz et al. "Optical self-organisation in bulk and MQW GaAlAs Microresonators", Phys.Rev.Lett. 84, 6006 (2000)
n-contact
The VCSELTh. Knoedl, M. Miller and R. Jaeger, University of Ulm
Bragg reflector
Bragg reflector
GaAs Substrate
E In
p-contact
Experimental results
In the homogeneous region: formation of a single spot of about
10 m diameter
Observation of differentstructures (symmetry and spatial wavelength) in different spatial regions
Interaction disappears on the right side of the device due to cavity resonance gradient (400 GHz/150 m, imposed by construction)
Intensity (a.u.)
x (m)
Freq
uenc
y (G
Hz)
x
Above threshold,no injection (FRL)
Intensity (a.u.)
x (m)
Freq
uenc
y (G
Hz)
x
Below threshold,injected field
Control of two independent spots
Spots can be interpreted
as CS
50 W writing beam(WB) in b,d. WB-phase changed by in h,k
All the circled statescoexist when only the broad
beam is present
E = normalized S.V.E. of the intracavity fieldEI = normalized S.V.E. of the input fieldN = carrier density scaled to transp. value = cavity detuning parameter = bistability parameter 1 NiN
,),(),(1 2EaiENiyxEEyxitE
I
NdyxIENNtN 22 ),(Im
Where
Choice of a simple model: it describes the basic physics and more refined models showed no qualitatively different behaviours.
(x,y) = (C - in) / + (x,y) ),( yxEIn Broad Gaussian (twice the VCSEL)
The ModelL.Spinelli, G.Tissoni, M. Brambilla, F. Prati and L. A. Lugiato, Phys.Rev.A 58 , 2542 (1998)
Theoretical interpretation
-2.25 -2.00 -1.75 -1.50 -1.250
1
2
3112.537.5
x (m)150750
|ES|
x (m)0 37.5 75 112.5 150
-2.25 -2.00 -1.75 -1.50 -1.25
Patterns (rolls, filaments)Cavity Solitons
The vertical line corresponds to the MI boundary
CS form close to the MI boundary, on the red side
Pinning by inhomogeneities
Broad beam only
Experiment
Add local perturbation
Broad beam only
Cavity Solitonsappear close to the MI boundary, Final Position is imposed by roughnessof the cavity resonance frequency
Numerics
(x,y)
7 Solitons: a more recent achievement
Courtesy of Luca Furfaro e Xavier Hacier
CS in presence of a doughnut-shaped (TEM10 or 01) input beam: they experience
a rotational motion due to the input phase profile e i (x,y)
Numerical simulations of CS dynamics in presence of gradients in the input fields or/and thermal effects
Output intensity profileInput intensity profile
Intensity profile Temperature profile
Thermal effects induce on CS a spontaneous translational motion,originated by a Hopf instability with k 0
The thermal motion of CS can be guided on “tracks”, createdby means of a 1D phase modulation in the input field
Output intensity profileInput phase modulation
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
-0,2
-0,1
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
X
The thermal motion of CS can be guided on a ring, created by means of an input amplitude modulation
Output intensity profileInput amplitude modulation
CS in guided VCSEL above threshold: they are “sitting”on an unstable background
Output intensity profile
By reducing the input intensity, the system passes from the pattern branch (filaments) to CS
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.00
1
2
3
4
|ES|
EI
Next step:
Conclusions
Cavity solitons look like very interesting objects
To achieve control of CS position and of CS motion
by means of phase-amplitude modulations in the holding beam
There is by now a solid experimental demonstration of CS
in semiconductor microresonators
Thermal effects induce on CS a spontaneous translational
motion, that can be guided by means of appropriate
phase/amplitude modulations in the holding beam.
Preliminary numerical simulations demonstrate that
CS persist also above the laser threshold