cbfb evaluation

9
1 Overall Goal of College Bound from Birth • To engage multiple community partners in investing in a comprehensive, neighborhoodbased early education initiative that reflects best practices and l i h l di b • To engage multiple community partners in investing in a comprehensive, neighborhoodbased early education initiative that reflects best practices and l i h l di b Goal results in school readiness by kindergarten and reading and math literacy by grade three. results in school readiness by kindergarten and reading and math literacy by grade three.

Upload: grace-hill

Post on 23-Mar-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

CBfB Evaluation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CBfB Evaluation

1

Overall Goal of                                College Bound from Birth 

• To engage multiple community partners in investing in a comprehensive, neighborhood‐based early education initiative that reflects best practices and 

l i h l di b

• To engage multiple community partners in investing in a comprehensive, neighborhood‐based early education initiative that reflects best practices and 

l i h l di bGoal

results in school readiness by kindergarten and reading and math literacy by grade three.

results in school readiness by kindergarten and reading and math literacy by grade three.

Page 2: CBfB Evaluation

2

Three Components of College Bound from Birth ‐ Sunnyside

Improving the quality of child care

Strengthening families through parent education resources, classes, home visits

Expanding access to health care through enrolling families in health care plans, connecting them with primary care physicians

2010 Evaluation of Participating Child Care Centers

Assessment of CentersAssessment of Centers•Observers assess the learning environment, safety and interactions between teachers and children in the child care programs

External, Independent Evaluators•University of Texas School of Public Health is the principal evaluator; Research and Evaluation Services of Texas, subcontractor, is responsible for evaluation of child care programs

Page 3: CBfB Evaluation

3

Scope of 2010 Assessment

• 17 Classrooms 200 children• 17 Classrooms 200 children• 17 Classrooms, 200 children• Assessed quality of environment at beginning, one year and two years after start of intervention

• 17 Classrooms, 200 children• Assessed quality of environment at beginning, one year and two years after start of intervention

Infant and Toddler Classrooms

7 Cl 103 hild7 Cl 103 hild• 7 Classrooms, 103 children• Assessed quality of environment after one year of assistance by CC

• 7 Classrooms, 103 children• Assessed quality of environment after one year of assistance by CC

Preschool Classrooms

Assessment Tool Used to Access Quality of Child Care Programs – Environmental Rating Scales

Environmental Rating Scales are designed to assess group f hild f i f t fi fprograms for children from infancy to five years of age. 

Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale (ITERS)Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS)

Scale consists of 43 items organized into six subscales:Activities InteractionsProgram StructureProgram StructureSpace and FurnishingsPersonal Care RoutinesListening & Talking (ITERS)/Language‐Reasoning (ECERS)

Page 4: CBfB Evaluation

4

All About the Environmental Rating Scale

Each item is presented as a seven point scale:

Inadequate (1) describes care that does not even meet custodial care needs

Minimal (3) describes care that meets custodial and to some small degree basic developmental needs

G d (5) d ib th b i di iGood (5) describes the basic dimensions of developmental care

Excellent (7) describes high‐quality, personalized care

More About the Environmental Rating Scales

1 2 3 4 5 6 7Inadequate Minimal Good to Excellent

Good to excellent materialsAmple indoor/outdoor 

Basic materials Sufficient spaceBasic provisions in

No materials or poor materials Insufficient space

Score of 1 – 2.99 Score of 3 – 4.99 Score of 5 – 7

p /spacePersonalized careConsistently positive interaction

Basic provisions in place for health/safetySome positive interactions between teacher/children

pChild is at risk for health/safety issuesInappropriate or no  interaction between teacher/children

Page 5: CBfB Evaluation

5

ActivitiesArt, music and movement

Areas of Care/Education that are Assessed by Environmental Rating Scales

Space and FurnishingsIndoor space

Fine motor and active physical playBlocks, dramatic play, sand and water payNature and science

InteractionsSupervisionPeer interactionsStaff‐child interactionsDiscipline

Furniture Room arrangement

Personal Care RoutinesGreeting/departingMeals/snacksHealth and safety practicesDiapering/toileting

Program StructureSchedules, free play, group activitiesProvision for children with disabilities

Listening and Talking (ITERS)/Language and Reasoning (ECERS)

Helping children understand and use languageUsing books and picturesBooks and pictures

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

46%30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

77%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

31%23%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0%23%

Baseline                                                                                 After 2 Years

Page 6: CBfB Evaluation

6

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

100%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

46%38%

15%0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0% 0%

Baseline                                                                                 After 2 Years

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

46%30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

85%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

31%23%

46%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0% 15%

Baseline                                                                                 After 2 Years

Page 7: CBfB Evaluation

7

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

57%

43% 20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

43%

57%

0%

10%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0%0%

10%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0%

Baseline                                                                                   After 1 Year

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

71%30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

43%57%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

14% 14%0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0%

43%

Baseline                                                                                   After 1 Year

Page 8: CBfB Evaluation

8

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

86%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

86%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0% 14%0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0% 14%

Baseline                                                                                   After 1 Year

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

100%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

75%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0% 0%0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

25%

0%

Baseline                                                                                   After 1 Year

Page 9: CBfB Evaluation

9

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

75%30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

50%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

25%0%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

25%25%

Baseline                                                                                   After 1 Year

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

88%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

63%

0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

13% 0%0%

10%

20%

Inadequate Minimal Good+

0%

38%

Baseline                                                                                   After 1 Year