c:documents and settings heitzmamy ......title c:documents and settings heitzmamy...
TRANSCRIPT
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-1
Appendix I. Selected Plots of Datasonde results Collected by Ohio EPA in theSandusky River Basin During 2001-02
This appendix shows plots of dissolved oxygen (D.O.), temperature, pH andconductivity for most of the Sandusky River basin sites where submersible monitorswere deployed by Ohio EPA’s Water Quality Modeling staff during the 2002 fieldseason. The monitors measured each parameter once per hour, usually for a 48 hourperiod during each survey. The data was compared to 2001 datasonde results for a fewsites, particularly those that are not attaining their aquatic life use designation (based onthe 2001 biological assessment). A list of site names and river miles is also attached,to help users identify the location of the plotted data. The usefulness of looking athourly data for D.O. and temperature is that it reveals extreme values not alwayscaptured when survey crews collect manual measurements during typical businesshours. These extreme values can contribute to impairment of a stream segment,depending on the magnitude & duration. Many sites where temperature extremes wererecorded also showed poor biological scores compared to adjacent sites (upstream ordownstream).
Some highlights:• The maximum temperature water quality standard (29.4o C) and the minimum
D.O. WQS (4 mg/l) were exceeded at a few sites in the mainstem (Figures 1through 4) and several tributaries. The implications of these exceedancesrelative to aquatic life use attainment should be considered, because at many ofthose sites the biological indices are lower than at the upstream or downstreamsites. The main reason for the temperature extremes in those sites are lack ofupstream flow and little or no riparian shade.
• Hourly plots of dissolved oxygen in the vicinity of the Bucyrus WWTP (shown inFigure 4) illustrate the magnitude and duration of the D.O. violations at thosesites. Hourly data is available for all sites where the monitors were deployed.
• Dissolved oxygen and temperature violations were recorded in Broken SwordCreek, specially at the upstream sites (Figures 5 through 7). These sites sufferfrom habitat impairment (no riparian shade, lack of pooled reaches, low flows dueto extensive network of drainage tiles. Temperatures dropped downstream, asmore flow entered the stream and riparian shade increased.
• The Little Sandusky showed low D.O. at RM 6.5, but not at RM 1.5 during theSeptember 12 (2002) survey. The streamflows during that survey wereextremely low throughout the basin. Higher flows and more riparian shade at thedownstream site helped moderate instream temperature.
• Tymochtee Creek (Figure 10) showed very low dissolved oxygen concentrations,
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-2
in spite of fairly low stream temperature (low temperatures improve oxygensolubility in water). All the sites shown on this plot are in partial attainment of theWWH use designation. The main reason for the poor biological scores are lowwater levels, which exacerbate the impact of small nutrient loads from failingseptic system inflows and agricultural nonpoint sources.
• Sycamore Creek and Honey Creek (Figures 11 and 12) show wide dissolvedoxygen swings indicative of high algal concentrations at the upstream sites. Sites closer to the mouth had a smaller range of D.O. values. The streamflowduring September 2002 was near record lows, and Honey Creek historically hasamong the lowest summer yields (in cfs/square mile) compared to other gages inthe Sandusky watershed.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-3
Sandusky River Dissolved OxygenJuly 1-3, 2002
0.002.004.006.008.00
10.0012.0014.0016.00
127.8 120.8 113.5 111.2 110.4 98.69
River Mile
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DO
Ave DO
Sandusky River Temperature July 1-3, 2002
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
127.8 120.8 113.5 111.2 110.4 98.69
River Mile
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max TempMin TempAve temp
Figure 1. Sandusky River D.O., pH, Temperature and Conductivity (max/min & average) vs. River Mile During July 1-3, 2002.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-4
Sandusky River pHJuly 1-3, 2002
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
127.8 120.8 113.5 111.2 110.4 98.69
River Mile
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pHAve pH
Sandusky River ConductivityJuly 1-3, 2002
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
127.8 120.8 113.5 111.2 110.4 98.69
River Mile
Con
duct
ivity
(mS/
cm)
Max Cond
Min Cond
Ave Cond
Figure 1. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-5
S a n d u s k y R . D is s o lv e d O x y g e n J u ly 1 6 -1 8 , 2 0 0 2
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 6 9 5 9 2 9 0 8 0 7 8 7 6 7 4 6 7
R iv e r M ile
D.O
. (m
g/l)
M a x D OM in D OA ve D O
Sandusky R. Temperature July 16-18, 2002
1214161820222426283032
111 110 106 95 92 90 80 78 76 74 67River Mile
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max TempMin TempAve temp
Figure 2. Sandusky River D.O., pH, Temperature and Conductivity (max/min & average) vs. River Mile During July 16-18, 2002.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-6
Sandusky R. pH July 16-18, 2002
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
111 110 106 95 92 90 80 78 76 74 67
River Mile
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pHAve pH
Sandusky R. Conductivity July 16-18, 2002
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
111 110 106 95 92 90 80 78 76 74 67
River Mile
Con
duct
ivity
(mS/
cm)
Max CondMin CondAve Cond
Figure 2. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-7
Sandusky River Dissolved OxygenAugust 13-15, 2002
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
130 128 125 125 121 118 116 115 114 111 110 108 106 102 100 98.7 95.4
River Mile
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DOAve DO
Sandusky River TemperatureAugust 13-15, 2002
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
130 128 125 125 121 118 116 115 114 111 110 108 106 102 100 99 95
River Mile
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max TempMin TempAve temp
Figure 3. Sandusky River D.O., pH, Temperature and Conductivity (max/min & average) vs. River Mile During August 13-15, 2002.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-8
Sandusky River pHAugust 13-15, 2002
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
130 128 125 125 121 118 116 115 114 111 110 108 106 102 100 98.7 95.4
River Mile
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pH
Ave pH
Sandusky River ConductivityAugust 13-15, 2002
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
130 128 125 125 121 118 116 115 114 111 110 108 106 102 100 99 95
River Mile
Con
duct
ivity
(mS/
cm)
Max CondMin CondAve Cond
Figure 3. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Sandusky R D.O. Upst Bucyrus WWTP RM 111.2
7/2/027/17/028/14/02Ave DO WQS
Dis
solv
ed O
xyge
n (m
g/l)
Hours
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Sandusky R Downstream Bucyrus WWTP outfall RM 110.4
7/17/028/14/027/24/01Ave DO WQS
Dis
solv
ed O
xyge
n (m
g/l)
Hours
Figure 4. Sandusky River hourly Dissolved Oxygen concentrations upstream and downstream of the Bucyrus WWTP during OhioEPA surveys conducted in 2001 and 2002. This reach is not attaining its use designation.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-10
Broken Sword Creek Dissolved Oxygen July 16-18, 2002
0.002.004.006.008.00
10.0012.0014.0016.00
27.7 25.5 23.3 19.2 16.8 5.1 0.9
River Mile
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DO
Ave DO
Broken Sword Creek Temperature July 16-18, 2002
15
20
25
30
27.7 25.5 23.3 19.2 16.8 5.1 0.9
River Mile
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max Temp
Min TempAve temp
Figure 5. Broken Sword Creek D.O., pH, Temperature and Conductivity (max/min & average) vs. River Mile During July 16-18, 2002.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-11
Broken Sword Creek pH July 16-18, 2002
6.006.507.007.508.008.509.00
27.7 25.5 23.3 19.2 16.8 5.1 0.9
River Mile
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pH
Ave pH
Broken Sword Creek Conductivity July 16-18, 2002
0.60
0.700.80
0.901.00
1.10
27.7 25.5 23.3 19.2 16.8 5.1 0.9
River Mile
Con
duct
ivity
(mS/
cm)
Max Cond
Min Cond
Ave Cond
Figure 5. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-12
Broken Sword Creek Dissolved Oxygen September 10-12, 2002
02468
10121416
25.5 12.4 2.4
River Mile
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DOAve DO
Broken Sword Creek Temperature September 10-12, 2002
12
17
22
27
32
25.5 12.4 2.35
River Mile
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max TempMin TempAve temp
Figure 6. Broken Sword Creek D.O., pH, Temperature and Conductivity (max/min & average) vs. River Mile During September10-12, 2002.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-13
Broken Sword Creek - pHSeptember 10-12, 2002
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
25.5 12.4 2.4
River Mile
pH (S
.U.) Max pHMin pHAve pH
Broken Sword Creek Conductivity September 10-12, 2002
0.60.70.80.91.01.11.21.31.4
25.5 12.4 2.4
River Mile
Con
duct
ivity
(uS)
Max CondMin CondAve Cond
Figure 6. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-14
Broken Sword Ck at Schwemley RM 25.5D.O. : 2001-2001 Surveys
02468
10121416
Aug 7-9, 2001 July 16-18, 2002 Sep 10-12, 2002
Date
Dis
solv
ed O
xyge
n (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DO
Ave DO
Broken Sword Ck at Schwemley RM 25.5Temperature: 2001-2002 Surveys
13
18
23
28
33
Aug 7-9, 2001 July 16-18, 2002 Sep 10-12, 2002
Date
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max Temp
Min Temp
Ave temp
Figure 7. Broken Sword Creek D.O.,Temperature and pH (max/min & average) at RM 25.5 During 2001-02.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-15
Broken Sword Ck at Schwemley RM 25.5pH: 2001-2001 Surveys
77.5
88.5
9
Aug 7-9,2001
July 16-18,2002
Sep 10-12,2002
Date
pH (S
.U.)
Max pH
Min pH
Ave pH
Figure 7. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-16
Little Sandusky R. Dissolved OxygenSeptember 10-12, 2002
02468
10121416
6.5 1.5
River Mile
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DOAve DO
Little Sandusky River Temperature September 10-12, 2002
12
17
22
27
32
6.5 1.5
River Mile
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max TempMin TempAve temp
Figure 8. Little Sandusky River D.O.,Temperature and pH (max/min & average) During September 10-12, 2002 Survey.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-17
Little Sandusky River - pHSeptember 10-12, 2002
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
6.5 1.5
River Mile
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pHAve pH
Figure 8. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-18
Little Sandusky at CR 113 Dissolved Oxygen: 2001-02 Surveys
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Aug 7-9, 2001 July 16-18, 2002 Sep 10-12, 2002
Date
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DOAve DO
Little Sandusky at CR 113 Temperature: 2001-02 Surveys
15
20
25
30
Aug 7-9, 2001 July 16-18, 2002 Sep 10-12, 2002
Date
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max TempMin TempAve temp
Figure 9. Little Sandusky River D.O.,Temperature and pH (max/min & average) at CR 113 (RM 1.5) During 2001-02 Ohio EPASurveys.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-19
Little Sandusky at CR 113, RM 1.5 pH: 2001-02 Surveys
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
Aug 7-9, 2001 July 16-18, 2002 Sep 10-12, 2002
Date
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pHAve pH
Figure 9. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-20
Tymochtee Ck Dissolved Oxygen Sept 18-20, 2002
02468
10121416
40.76 34 26.7 19.45 13.7
River M ile
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DOAve DO
Tymochtee Ck Temperature Sept 18-20, 2002
1214161820222426283032
40.76 34 26.7 19.45 13.7
Riv e r M ile
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max TempMin TempAve temp
Figure 10. Tymochtee Creek D.O.,Temperature and pH (max/min & average): Sept. 18-2002 Ohio EPA Survey.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-21
Tymochtee Ck - pH Sept 18-20, 2002
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
40.76 34 26.7 19.45 13.7
River Mile
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pHAve pH
Figure 10. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-22
S y c a m o r e C r e e k Dis s o lv e d O x y g e n S e p t 1 8 -2 0 , 2 0 0 2
02468
1 01 21 41 6
5 3 .5
Riv e r M ile
D.O
. (m
g/l) Ma x DO
Min DO
A v e DO
S y c a m o r e C k T e m p e r a tu r e S e p t 1 8 - 2 0 , 2 0 0 2
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
2 0
2 2
2 4
2 6
5 3 .5
Riv e r M ile
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Ma x Te mp
Min Te mp
A v e te mp
Figure 11. Sycamore Creek D.O.,Temperature and pH (max/min & average): Sept. 18, 2002 Ohio EPA Survey.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-23
S y c a m o r e C r e e k - p H S e p t 1 8 - 2 0 , 2 0 0 2
7 .0
7 .5
8 .0
8 .5
9 .0
5 3 .5
R iv e r M ile
pH (S
.U.) M a x p H
M in p H
A v e p H
Figure 11. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-24
Honey Creek Dissolved Oxygen Sept 18-20, 2002
02
46
810
1214
16
14.8 6.6
Rive r M ile
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DO
Ave DO
Honey Creek Temperature Sept 18-20, 2002
1214
16182022
2426
14.8 6.6
River Mile
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max Temp
Min Temp
Ave temp
Figure 12. Honey Creek D.O.,Temperature and pH (max/min & average): Sept. 18, 2002 Ohio EPA Survey.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-25
Honey Creek pH Sept 18-20, 2002
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
14.8 6.6
River Mile
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pH
Ave pH
Figure 12. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-26
Westerly Creek at Oldfield Rd, RM 0.13 Dissolved Oxygen: 2002 Surveys
01234567
July 1-3, 2002 August 13-15, 2002
Date
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DOAve DO
Westerly Creek at Oldfield Rd, RM 0.13 Temperature: 2002 Surveys
15
20
25
30
July 1-3, 2002 August 13-15, 2002
Date
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max TempMin TempAve temp
Figure 13. Westerly Creek D.O., Temperature and pH (max/min & average): July /August 2002 Ohio EPA Surveys.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-27
Westerly Creek at Oldfield Rd, RM 0.13 pH: 2002 Surveys
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
July 1-3, 2002 August 13-15, 2002
Date
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pHAve pH
Figure 13. Continued
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-28
Paramour Creek at Nazor Rd, RM 1.5 Dissolved Oxygen: 2002 Surveys
0
2
4
6
8
10
July 1-3, 2002 August 13-15, 2002
Date
D.O
. (m
g/l) Max DO
Min DOAve DO
Paramour Creek at Nazor Rd, RM 1.5 Temperature: 2002 Surveys
15
20
25
30
July 1-3, 2002 August 13-15, 2002
Date
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Max TempMin TempAve temp
Figure 14. Paramour Creek D.O., Temperature and pH (max/min & average): July /August 2002 Ohio EPA Surveys.
Upper Sandusky River Watershed TMDLs
I-29
Paramour Creek at Nazor Rd, RM 1.5 pH: 2002 Surveys
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8
July 1-3, 2002 August 13-15, 2002
Date
pH (S
.U.) Max pH
Min pHAve pH
Figure 14. Continued