cdq™ dehumidification with trane rooftop units · figure 5. energy use comparison energy...

4
Cool, Dry, Quiet CDQ™ Dehumidification with Trane Rooftop Units January 2006 CDQ-SLB001-EN

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jul-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CDQ™ Dehumidification with Trane Rooftop Units · Figure 5. Energy Use Comparison Energy Improvement Trane RTU with CDQ vs Standard RTU with Reheat Mixed Air Unit Min Savings 0%

Cool, Dry, Quiet

CDQ™ Dehumidification with Trane Rooftop Units

January 2006 CDQ-SLB001-EN

Page 2: CDQ™ Dehumidification with Trane Rooftop Units · Figure 5. Energy Use Comparison Energy Improvement Trane RTU with CDQ vs Standard RTU with Reheat Mixed Air Unit Min Savings 0%

© 2006 American Standard Inc. All rights reserved CDQ-SLB001-EN

Trane CDQ™ (Cool, Dry, Quiet) System Concept

More water removed per ton of cooling and no field modifications required

Example: 55% more dehumidification at ARI conditions

SHR=0.74 SHR=0.59Remove up to 200% more water vapor and

drop dew points below 48 degrees F!

Figure 1. RTU airflow path

The Trane CDQ™ desiccant wheel is used to enhance the dehumidification performance of a traditional cooling coil. The wheel is configured in series with the coil (see Figure 1) such that the “regeneration” side of the wheel is located upstream of the coil and the “process” side of the wheel is located downstream of the cooling coil. The wheel recirculates the water vapor trapped downstream of the cooling coil back into the air upstream of the coil where the coil removes it through condensation. This process is accomplished without the need for a second regeneration air stream. The addition of the CDQ desiccant wheel to the system enhances the dehumidification performance of the traditional cooling coil.

For units with less that 40 percent outside air, CDQ can greatly improve the latent capacity of the unit (see Figure 2). This results in a lower sensible heat ratio (SHR) without the addition of reheat.

Developed in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy through Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Page 3: CDQ™ Dehumidification with Trane Rooftop Units · Figure 5. Energy Use Comparison Energy Improvement Trane RTU with CDQ vs Standard RTU with Reheat Mixed Air Unit Min Savings 0%

Trane CDQ™ (Cool, Dry, Quiet) System Concept

CDQ-SLB001-EN 3

Figure 3. RTU psychrometric conditions

Figure 4. Part-load operation comparison

sensible

latent

sensible

latent

sensible

latent

sensible

latent

sensible

latent

reheat

ca

pa

cit

y

Standard 3-ton unit

Unit SHR = 0.80

Run time = 40 min

Water removed = 5.0 lb

Standard 3-ton unit with reheat

Unit SHR = 0.73

Run time = 60 min (+50%)

Water removed = 7.5 lb (+50%)

Standard 3-ton unit with CDQ™

Unit SHR = 0.66

Run time = 50 min (+25%)

Water removed = 10.3 lb (+106%)

(equiv

ale

nt

sensib

le load: 1

.8 t

on

-hr)

improving part-load dehumidificationRTU DX unit

Part Load Energy Savings

Adding part load humidity control will add more energy no matter how it is done. Trane CDQ™ differs from hot gas reheat because it will increase the latent capacity. Reheat does not effect the latent capacity of a unit, it simply makes the unit run longer. Thus CDQ will run less than hot gas reheat and produce drier air.

Figure 2. Latent capacity

Source: Independent testing conducted by ETL, Intertek Labs for Department of Energy Contract #4000010096, 3 ton unit with 20% outside air

Cool Dry Quiet• No reheat

• Efficient, all electric

• Cool but drier

• Lower dew points

• Lower SHRs

• Higher latent capacity

• 10-15dB discharge sound attenuation

Page 4: CDQ™ Dehumidification with Trane Rooftop Units · Figure 5. Energy Use Comparison Energy Improvement Trane RTU with CDQ vs Standard RTU with Reheat Mixed Air Unit Min Savings 0%

Trane

A business of American Standard Companies

www.trane.com

For more information, contact your local Trane office or e-mail us at [email protected]

Literature Order Number CDQ-SLB001-EN

Date January 2006

Supersedes New

Stocking Location La Crosse

Trane has a policy of continuous product and product data improvement and reserves the right to change design and specifications without notice.

Figure 5. Energy Use Comparison

Energy ImprovementTrane RTU with CDQ

vs Standard RTU with Reheat

Mixed Air Unit

Min

Savings

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

35% 50% 65%

Space Relative Humidity

Imp

rove

me

nt

@E

qu

al T

ota

l C

ap

acit

y Max

Humidity-Sensitive Application

For applications requiring humidity control 24/7 and 35-55 percent RH, a Trane high-efficiency rooftop unit (RTU) with CDQ dehumidification will:

• Allow downsizing 15-33 percent

• Improve latent capacity 40-160 percent

• Lower dew points 2-5 F

• Reduce cooling energy 10-30 percent

• Reduce reheat and total energy 30-90 percent

CDQ Curbs for Rooftop

Units

To achieve these performance levels, a high-efficiency Trane rooftop unit must be used with a CDQ curb section. The CDQ curb section is manufactured by our partner, Thybar Corporation. The two components are designed to go together with no field modifications required. Together, they comprise a CDQ system that can be used for new installations and retrofit applications.

Chicago1-800-666-2872

Akron1-800-837-2872

Dallas1-800-777-2872

Louisville1-800-993-2872