ce 555 - l21,22-ndt of steel
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
1/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
NDT and Evaluation of SteelStructures
Lectures 21,22
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
2/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
The Chemistry
The reaction between air and coke producescarbon monoxide (CO)
This gas reduces the iron ore to iron
At the high temperature, limestonedecomposes to calcium oxide and carbon
dioxide
The impurities react with this CaO to form slag
Called Blast furnace slag useful supplementary
cementitous material in concrete
2 3 2Fe O (s) + 3 CO (g) 2 Fe (s) + 3 CO (g)
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
3/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Continuous Casting of Steel
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
4/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Steel Finishing Final Shapes
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
5/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Which Iron is it?
Cast iron
Sandy texture (cast in molds filled with sand) Rounded internal corners, square external
corners
Typically hollow round shapes Wrought iron
Material delamination at edges corrosion
Members by riveting iron plates
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
6/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Cast Iron structures
Heavily used for columns
Widely available Pig iron Good corrosion and fire resistance
High compressive strength
Cheaper than wrought iron
Weak and unpredictable in tension and
bending Brittle failure
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
7/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Age as an indicator of strength
Before 1905 YS 25 ksi
1905-1932 YS 30 ksi 1933-1963 YS 33 ksi
After 1963 YS 36 ksi
YS of cast iron 20 ksi
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
8/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
History of structural steel
Structural carbon steel 1856 (Bessemer
converter) 1884 1st steel I-beams, structural frame
(Home Insurance Co, Chicago)
1889 Rand McNally Bldg, Chicago 1st allsteel framed skyscraper
1
st
AISC specification - 1923
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
9/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Properties of Carbon steel
Carbon steel (
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
10/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Mechanical Behavior of Iron-Carbon
Alloys
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
11/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Reinforcing bars
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
12/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
13/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Visual Inspection of steel structures
Magnifying glass, borescope, weld gages
Detects member deterioration
Excessive sagging or buckling
Lack of bracing
Rust, cracking, missing / loose fasteners
Cannot detect subsurface problems Cheap and effective
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
14/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Ultrasonic testing of steel (ASTM E
164) Ultrasonic waves 0.1
to 25 MHz
Reflected by interiorvoids, changes indensity etc
Resulted transmitted toa screen or a meter
Can detect voids,lamellar tearing,
porosity, changes incomposition, inclusionsetc
Can check pieces ofthickness upto 60 ft
Small and portable Bad for complex
shapes, rough surfaces
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
15/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
UP Testing
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
16/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Ultrasonics of steel
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
17/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Lamellar tearing
Occurs beneath theweld
In thick plates withpoor through-thicknessductility
Usually in large welds Welding heats the
steel and it expands
Cooling Tears thesteel
http://www.twi.co.uk/j32k/protected/band_3/jk47.html
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
18/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Radiography (ASTM E 94)
X-rays or gamma raysapplied
Identifies internal voids,changes in structure andother defects
X rays penetrate up to 30in, gamma rays 10 in
Used to detectundercutting and
incomplete penetration inwelds
Portable test, reliable
Expensive
Potentially dangerous,shielding needed
Large installations needcooling water, power
Orientation of the defects
influence the results
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
19/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Principle of radiography
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
20/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Magnetic particle method (ASTM E709)
Detection of surface and near surfacediscontinuities in a magnetic material
Generate magnetic flux in the article to beexamined
Flux lines should run along the surface at right
angles to the suspected defect When the flux lines approach a discontinuity, they
will stray out into the air at the mouth of the crack
The crack edge becomes magnetic Red or black oxide particles, or coated with a
fluorescent substance under UV
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
21/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Principle
Principle: magneticsusceptibility (degree of
magnetization of amaterial in response toa magnetic field) of a
defect is markedlypoorer (the magneticresistance is greater)
than that of thesurrounding material
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
22/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Finding cracks
www.simula.it
Seen
NotSeen
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
23/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Magnetizing the material
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
24/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Pros and Cons of Magnetic Particlemethod
Advantages of Magnetic Particle CrackDetection
Simplicity of operation and application.
Quantitative.
Can be automated, apart from viewing.
Disadvantages of Magnetic Particle CrackDetection
Restricted to ferromagnetic materials.
Restricted to surface or near surface flaws.
Not fail safe in that lack of indication could mean nodefects or process not carried out properly.
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
25/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Liquid Penetrant method (ASTM E165)
Reveals surface flaws by bleed out of acolored or fluorescent dye from the flaw
Liquid penetrant applied to the surface
Enters the defect by capillary action
Penetrant becomes visible when coated witha developing solution
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
26/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Penetrant glows in dark
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
27/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Uses and advantages
Locating surface cracks, areas of porosity,incomplete fusion in welds,
Complements the magnetic particle test
Simple and inexpensive
Shape independent
Can detect only small surface defects
Operator expertise, careful surface prepneeded
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
28/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Eddy current testing (ASTM E 566)
Eddy current
When alternating current is applied to the
conductor, a magnetic field develops in andaround the conductor
This magnetic field expands as the alternating
current rises to maximum and collapses as thecurrent is reduced to zero
If another electrical conductor is brought intothe close proximity to this changing magneticfield, current will be induced in this secondconductor
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
29/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
What does it do?
The eddy current testing technique is based oninducing electron flow (eddy currents) in
electrically conductive material Any defect in the material .e., cracks, pitting, wall
loss, or other discontinuities - disrupts the flow of
the eddy currents Higher frequency signals, up to 8 MHz, are used to
detect near-surface flaws
Lower frequencies (down to 50 Hz) are used whendeeper, subsurface flaw detection is required
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
30/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Eddy current testing
Eddy Currents aregenerated when
alternating voltage orcurrent flows throughthe excitation coil
Surface and sub-
surface defects resultin perturbations ofthe field. Theseperturbations aredetected by thedetector coils.
http://www.ndt-ed.org
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
31/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Pros and Cons
Continuously done, easily automated
Moderate cost Only a comparative procedure
May not detect cracks in some directions
Applicable to relatively shallow objects only
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
32/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Hardness testing (ASTM E 10, E 18)
Hardness is the propertyof a material that enables
it to resist plasticdeformation, usually bypenetration
Tensile strength andeffects of cold workingcan be roughly estimated
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
33/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Portable hardness testing
A steel ball of 10 mm. diameter (B) is placedbetween two surfaces, one (S) of known Brinellhardness, and the other (X) of unknown hardness,(X) being the material under investigation. Anypressure exerted against the assemblage of thethree, presses the ball (B) with the same force intothe surface (S) as into (X), and the sizes of theindentations obtained are in the direct proportionto the Brinell hardness of the two metals.
http://visgage.com/meter_operation.html
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
34/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Hardness scales compared
http://www.zianet.com/ebear/metal/hardness.html
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
35/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Destructive Tests
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
36/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Chemical test (ASTM E 30)
Determine the chemical composition,including the carbon content
Helpful in the determination of weldability,ductility and corrosion resistance
Most common laboratory test Sample obtained using drilling
Portable spectrograph for in-situ testing
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
37/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Bend test (ASTM E 190, E 290)
To ensure that a metal has sufficientductility to stand bending without fracturing
A standard specimen is bent through aspecified arc (U-shape)
Direction of grain flow is noted and whetherthe bend is with or across the grain
Lacks quantifiable results
Coating imperfections from bend
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
38/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Coating imperfections from bendtest
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
39/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Tension testing
Specimen removed by flame cutting,machined, subjected to axial tension
Load-elongation curve, strength, elongation,% reduction in area measured
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
40/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Tension test (ASTM E 8)
pl
Y
f
u
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
41/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Steel failure
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
42/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Strength testing on coupons
Weiss 2001
Impact tests (ASTM E 23, E 208, A
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
43/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Impact tests (ASTM E 23, E 208, A673)
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
44/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Impact tests
Detects differences between materials which arcnot observable in a tension test
Charpy specimen (favored in US) square cross section (10x10 mm)
45 V notch, 2 mm deep with a 0.25 mm root radius
Specimen supported as a beam in a horizontal position
and loaded behind the notch by the impact of a heavyswinging pendulum
Specimen is forced to bend and fracture at a high strainrate on the order of 103 s-1
Izod specimen (favored in Europe) circular or square cross section and contains a V notch
near the clamped end
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
45/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Residual stress
Residual (locked-in) stresses in a structuralmaterial or component are those stresseswhich exist in the object without (andusually prior to) the application of anyservice or other external loads
From casting, welding, machining, molding,heat treatment, etc.
Detrimental cause of fatigue and otherfailures when service loads are superimposed
Hole drilling strain gage method
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
46/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
g g g(ASTM E 837)
Hole of predetermined size drilled in a beamor column flange
Stresses around the hole are relieved andmeasured by strain gages
From these, principal surface stresses aredetermined
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
47/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Strain relief
http://www.npl.co.uk/materials/residualstress/
S i d i
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
48/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Strain gage design
http://www.npl.co.uk/materials/residualstress/
St ti
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
49/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Stress equations
http://www.npl.co.uk/materials/residualstress/
l d
-
8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel
50/50
Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening
Potential errors and uncertainties
Hole dimensions diameter, concentricity, profile
Centre of drilled hole to coincide with centre of gauge
circle to 0.025 mm Hole depth (measure and control to < 1 mm !)
Surface roughness and flatness
Specimen preparation
Induced stresses from machining the hole
Material properties
Incorrect gauge selection
use small size where steep stress gradients
http://www.npl.co.uk/materials/residualstress/