ce 555 - l21,22-ndt of steel

Upload: hung-phan

Post on 04-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    1/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    NDT and Evaluation of SteelStructures

    Lectures 21,22

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    2/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    The Chemistry

    The reaction between air and coke producescarbon monoxide (CO)

    This gas reduces the iron ore to iron

    At the high temperature, limestonedecomposes to calcium oxide and carbon

    dioxide

    The impurities react with this CaO to form slag

    Called Blast furnace slag useful supplementary

    cementitous material in concrete

    2 3 2Fe O (s) + 3 CO (g) 2 Fe (s) + 3 CO (g)

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    3/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Continuous Casting of Steel

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    4/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Steel Finishing Final Shapes

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    5/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Which Iron is it?

    Cast iron

    Sandy texture (cast in molds filled with sand) Rounded internal corners, square external

    corners

    Typically hollow round shapes Wrought iron

    Material delamination at edges corrosion

    Members by riveting iron plates

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    6/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Cast Iron structures

    Heavily used for columns

    Widely available Pig iron Good corrosion and fire resistance

    High compressive strength

    Cheaper than wrought iron

    Weak and unpredictable in tension and

    bending Brittle failure

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    7/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Age as an indicator of strength

    Before 1905 YS 25 ksi

    1905-1932 YS 30 ksi 1933-1963 YS 33 ksi

    After 1963 YS 36 ksi

    YS of cast iron 20 ksi

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    8/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    History of structural steel

    Structural carbon steel 1856 (Bessemer

    converter) 1884 1st steel I-beams, structural frame

    (Home Insurance Co, Chicago)

    1889 Rand McNally Bldg, Chicago 1st allsteel framed skyscraper

    1

    st

    AISC specification - 1923

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    9/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Properties of Carbon steel

    Carbon steel (

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    10/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Mechanical Behavior of Iron-Carbon

    Alloys

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    11/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Reinforcing bars

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    12/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    13/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Visual Inspection of steel structures

    Magnifying glass, borescope, weld gages

    Detects member deterioration

    Excessive sagging or buckling

    Lack of bracing

    Rust, cracking, missing / loose fasteners

    Cannot detect subsurface problems Cheap and effective

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    14/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Ultrasonic testing of steel (ASTM E

    164) Ultrasonic waves 0.1

    to 25 MHz

    Reflected by interiorvoids, changes indensity etc

    Resulted transmitted toa screen or a meter

    Can detect voids,lamellar tearing,

    porosity, changes incomposition, inclusionsetc

    Can check pieces ofthickness upto 60 ft

    Small and portable Bad for complex

    shapes, rough surfaces

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    15/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    UP Testing

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    16/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Ultrasonics of steel

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    17/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Lamellar tearing

    Occurs beneath theweld

    In thick plates withpoor through-thicknessductility

    Usually in large welds Welding heats the

    steel and it expands

    Cooling Tears thesteel

    http://www.twi.co.uk/j32k/protected/band_3/jk47.html

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    18/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Radiography (ASTM E 94)

    X-rays or gamma raysapplied

    Identifies internal voids,changes in structure andother defects

    X rays penetrate up to 30in, gamma rays 10 in

    Used to detectundercutting and

    incomplete penetration inwelds

    Portable test, reliable

    Expensive

    Potentially dangerous,shielding needed

    Large installations needcooling water, power

    Orientation of the defects

    influence the results

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    19/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Principle of radiography

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    20/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Magnetic particle method (ASTM E709)

    Detection of surface and near surfacediscontinuities in a magnetic material

    Generate magnetic flux in the article to beexamined

    Flux lines should run along the surface at right

    angles to the suspected defect When the flux lines approach a discontinuity, they

    will stray out into the air at the mouth of the crack

    The crack edge becomes magnetic Red or black oxide particles, or coated with a

    fluorescent substance under UV

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    21/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Principle

    Principle: magneticsusceptibility (degree of

    magnetization of amaterial in response toa magnetic field) of a

    defect is markedlypoorer (the magneticresistance is greater)

    than that of thesurrounding material

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    22/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Finding cracks

    www.simula.it

    Seen

    NotSeen

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    23/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Magnetizing the material

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    24/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Pros and Cons of Magnetic Particlemethod

    Advantages of Magnetic Particle CrackDetection

    Simplicity of operation and application.

    Quantitative.

    Can be automated, apart from viewing.

    Disadvantages of Magnetic Particle CrackDetection

    Restricted to ferromagnetic materials.

    Restricted to surface or near surface flaws.

    Not fail safe in that lack of indication could mean nodefects or process not carried out properly.

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    25/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Liquid Penetrant method (ASTM E165)

    Reveals surface flaws by bleed out of acolored or fluorescent dye from the flaw

    Liquid penetrant applied to the surface

    Enters the defect by capillary action

    Penetrant becomes visible when coated witha developing solution

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    26/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Penetrant glows in dark

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    27/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Uses and advantages

    Locating surface cracks, areas of porosity,incomplete fusion in welds,

    Complements the magnetic particle test

    Simple and inexpensive

    Shape independent

    Can detect only small surface defects

    Operator expertise, careful surface prepneeded

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    28/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Eddy current testing (ASTM E 566)

    Eddy current

    When alternating current is applied to the

    conductor, a magnetic field develops in andaround the conductor

    This magnetic field expands as the alternating

    current rises to maximum and collapses as thecurrent is reduced to zero

    If another electrical conductor is brought intothe close proximity to this changing magneticfield, current will be induced in this secondconductor

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    29/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    What does it do?

    The eddy current testing technique is based oninducing electron flow (eddy currents) in

    electrically conductive material Any defect in the material .e., cracks, pitting, wall

    loss, or other discontinuities - disrupts the flow of

    the eddy currents Higher frequency signals, up to 8 MHz, are used to

    detect near-surface flaws

    Lower frequencies (down to 50 Hz) are used whendeeper, subsurface flaw detection is required

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    30/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Eddy current testing

    Eddy Currents aregenerated when

    alternating voltage orcurrent flows throughthe excitation coil

    Surface and sub-

    surface defects resultin perturbations ofthe field. Theseperturbations aredetected by thedetector coils.

    http://www.ndt-ed.org

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    31/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Pros and Cons

    Continuously done, easily automated

    Moderate cost Only a comparative procedure

    May not detect cracks in some directions

    Applicable to relatively shallow objects only

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    32/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Hardness testing (ASTM E 10, E 18)

    Hardness is the propertyof a material that enables

    it to resist plasticdeformation, usually bypenetration

    Tensile strength andeffects of cold workingcan be roughly estimated

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    33/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Portable hardness testing

    A steel ball of 10 mm. diameter (B) is placedbetween two surfaces, one (S) of known Brinellhardness, and the other (X) of unknown hardness,(X) being the material under investigation. Anypressure exerted against the assemblage of thethree, presses the ball (B) with the same force intothe surface (S) as into (X), and the sizes of theindentations obtained are in the direct proportionto the Brinell hardness of the two metals.

    http://visgage.com/meter_operation.html

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    34/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Hardness scales compared

    http://www.zianet.com/ebear/metal/hardness.html

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    35/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Destructive Tests

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    36/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Chemical test (ASTM E 30)

    Determine the chemical composition,including the carbon content

    Helpful in the determination of weldability,ductility and corrosion resistance

    Most common laboratory test Sample obtained using drilling

    Portable spectrograph for in-situ testing

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    37/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Bend test (ASTM E 190, E 290)

    To ensure that a metal has sufficientductility to stand bending without fracturing

    A standard specimen is bent through aspecified arc (U-shape)

    Direction of grain flow is noted and whetherthe bend is with or across the grain

    Lacks quantifiable results

    Coating imperfections from bend

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    38/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Coating imperfections from bendtest

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    39/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Tension testing

    Specimen removed by flame cutting,machined, subjected to axial tension

    Load-elongation curve, strength, elongation,% reduction in area measured

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    40/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Tension test (ASTM E 8)

    pl

    Y

    f

    u

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    41/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Steel failure

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    42/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Strength testing on coupons

    Weiss 2001

    Impact tests (ASTM E 23, E 208, A

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    43/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Impact tests (ASTM E 23, E 208, A673)

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    44/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Impact tests

    Detects differences between materials which arcnot observable in a tension test

    Charpy specimen (favored in US) square cross section (10x10 mm)

    45 V notch, 2 mm deep with a 0.25 mm root radius

    Specimen supported as a beam in a horizontal position

    and loaded behind the notch by the impact of a heavyswinging pendulum

    Specimen is forced to bend and fracture at a high strainrate on the order of 103 s-1

    Izod specimen (favored in Europe) circular or square cross section and contains a V notch

    near the clamped end

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    45/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Residual stress

    Residual (locked-in) stresses in a structuralmaterial or component are those stresseswhich exist in the object without (andusually prior to) the application of anyservice or other external loads

    From casting, welding, machining, molding,heat treatment, etc.

    Detrimental cause of fatigue and otherfailures when service loads are superimposed

    Hole drilling strain gage method

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    46/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    g g g(ASTM E 837)

    Hole of predetermined size drilled in a beamor column flange

    Stresses around the hole are relieved andmeasured by strain gages

    From these, principal surface stresses aredetermined

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    47/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Strain relief

    http://www.npl.co.uk/materials/residualstress/

    S i d i

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    48/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Strain gage design

    http://www.npl.co.uk/materials/residualstress/

    St ti

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    49/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Stress equations

    http://www.npl.co.uk/materials/residualstress/

    l d

  • 8/13/2019 CE 555 - L21,22-NDT of steel

    50/50

    Neithalath, Spring 2006, CE 455/555 Structural Damage: Assessment, Repair, and Strengthening

    Potential errors and uncertainties

    Hole dimensions diameter, concentricity, profile

    Centre of drilled hole to coincide with centre of gauge

    circle to 0.025 mm Hole depth (measure and control to < 1 mm !)

    Surface roughness and flatness

    Specimen preparation

    Induced stresses from machining the hole

    Material properties

    Incorrect gauge selection

    use small size where steep stress gradients

    http://www.npl.co.uk/materials/residualstress/