cee 434 geotechnical design fall 2008 grading and site improvement methods part i

51
CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Upload: alaina-sartor

Post on 14-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

CEE 434GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN

FALL 2008

GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS

PART I

Page 2: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

OUTLINE

I. Introduction

II. Case Studies

III. Factors Affecting Compaction

IV. Fundamentals of Shallow

Compaction

V. Examples

Page 3: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

I. Introduction

When considering a site for construction, a Geotechnical Engineer encounters:

Abandon

Adapt

Alter

Page 4: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

From: Coduto, 1999

“... almost no significant engineered construction occurs without the movement of soil from one place to another!”

-Ed Monahan, 1994

Page 5: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Research Park Tech Center IV Construction Camera #1

Page 6: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

UNCONTROLLED AND CONTROLLED FILLS CONT’D…

2V TO 1H

Source: Greenfield, 1992

Research Park Tech Center IV Construction Camera #1

Page 7: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

II. CASE STUDIES

Page 8: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Compaction at a Highway Off-Ramp

The next series of photos are from the construction of a highway off-ramp in Davis, CA, in 1995. This relatively small earthwork job was performed with very few pieces of equipment (a

cat, water truck, grader, and the trucks that transported fill soils to the site).

http://cee.engr.ucdavis.edu/faculty/boulanger/geo_photo_album/GeoPhoto.html

Page 9: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

This cat is equipped with a blade for shaping the roadway and sheepsfoot rollers for compacting the clayey soils. Fill materials were brought to the site by trucks that spread the materials out in roughly 6 to 8 inch thick layers. The cat spread the material out evenly and compacted it at the same time.

Page 10: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

The water truck sprays the earth during compaction to condition the soil to near its optimum moisture content for compaction, and to control dust at the site.

Page 11: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

The operators of the water truck and cat sequence their passes across the site. A grader was later used for final shaping of the roadway surface.

Page 12: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Compaction at Los Vaqueros Dam

These next series of photos are from Los Vaqueros dam, California, during construction in 1998. This large earthwork project involved numerous pieces of equipment and required a

high degree of engineering quality control.

http://cee.engr.ucdavis.edu/faculty/boulanger/geo_photo_album/GeoPhoto.html

Page 13: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

View of the embankment from the upstream side, with almost 2/3 of the embankment completed. Notice the haul roads on the left abutment.

Page 14: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Backhoes carefully place large rocks (rip-rap) on the upstream face. The rocks are carefully packed together to protect the dam face from erosion.

Page 15: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

The different colored soils correspond to the upstream shell (left side), core (darkest), filter, and drain zone (lightest), and downstream shell.

Page 16: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

The core materials are being disked (left side) and compacted by sheepsfoot rollers.

Page 17: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

A closer view of the disk that breaks the imported soil down into smaller clods for effective moisture conditioning and compaction.

Page 18: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

The downstream filter and drain zones are the lighter-colored soils in the middle of this photo.

Page 19: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

The imported soils are raked by this caterpillar blade to remove any oversize boulders or cobbles.

Page 20: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

III. Factors Affecting Compaction

a) Soil Type

b) Moisture Content

c) Thickness of lift

d) Degree of compaction (intensity of pressure &

the coverage area)

e) Number of passes

Page 21: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Among the Questions to be Answered on These Two Projects:

• Why do we need to compact the soil in the first place?

• How much would the fill settle?

• What are the strength and permeability characteristics of the constructed dam? How much leakage through and under the dam?

• Where do we get the material from (borrow)?

• How do we compact the fill (lifts, equipment, etc)?

• How much water do we need to add to compact efficiently?

• How thick a layer of gravel and rock facing …?

• How fast could the fill be placed?

• What are the maximum allowable slopes?

• How much would the fill settle?

Page 22: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

IV. Fundamentals of Shallow Compaction

Page 23: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Air

Water

Solids

Air

Water

Solids

Air

Water

Solids

Natural Condition Being Hauled In Compacted Fill

Excavation, Transportation, and Compaction Stages of Construction

Page 24: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Stage 1. Laboratory Compaction

Page 25: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

What is compaction?

A simple ground improvement technique, where the soil is densified through external compactive effort.

+ water =

Compactive effort

From: N. Sivakugan

Page 26: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

From: Monahan, 1994

Page 27: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Source: Das, 2002

Page 28: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I
Page 29: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I
Page 30: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

PROCTOR TESTS

• Standard Proctor – historically regarded as non-

load-bearing (or light bldg loads, parking lots,

lightly secondary roads).

• Modified Proctor – load-bearing, “comparable to

that obtained with the heaviest rollers under

favorable working conditions.”

(Sowers, 1979)

Page 31: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I
Page 32: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Compaction Curve

Water content

Dry

den

sity

( d

)

optimum water content

d, max

Soil grains densely packed

- good strength and stiffness

- low permeability

From: N. Sivakugan

Page 33: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Source: Das, 2002

Page 34: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

From: Monahan, 1994

Page 35: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Zero Air Void Curve

All compaction points should lie to the left of ZAV curve

- corresponds to 100% saturation

Water content

Dry

den

sity

( d

)

Zero air void curve (S=100%)

s

wsd wG

G

1 :Eq

S<100%

S>100% (impossible)

From: N. Sivakugan

Page 36: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Compaction Curves for Spectrum of Soil Types

ED Monahan, 1994

Page 37: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Stage 2. Field Compaction

Page 38: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

SPECIFICATIONS

• Degree of Compaction

R(%) = CR (%)= [(d)field /(d)max-lab]x100%

• Typical Spec’s

(d)field = CR(%) x (d)max-lab

Page 39: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

-K.L. Lee, 1971

Relative Compaction – Relative Density Relationships

Page 40: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

From: Caterpillar, 1993

Page 41: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Smooth Wheel Rollers

• 100% coverage (under the wheels)

• Contact pressure = 45 to 55 psi

• Sandy & clayey soils

Page 42: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Pneumatic Rubber-Tired Rollers

• 4 to 6 (tires) in a row

• Contact pressure = 85 to 100 psi

• 70 to 80% coverage

• Sandy & clayey soils

Page 43: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Sheepsfoot Rollers

• Projection area = 4 to 13 in2

• Contact pressure = 200 to 1000 psi

• Clayey Soils

Page 44: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Vibratory Rollers

Vibration – by rotating off-centers weights

Handheld ones for limited access areas

Granular soils

Page 45: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

From: D’Appolonia, et al. 1969

From: Greenfield & Shen

Page 46: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

From: D’Appolonia, et al. 1969

Page 47: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Stage 3. Assessment

Page 48: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Sand Cone Method

• ASTM D-1556• Glass (or plastic) jar with

a metal cone• Ottawa sand (known wt. &

vol.)• Dig a hole – weigh the soil

and obtain w(%)• Fill the hole with sand• Determine the new wt. &

vol.• Eventually, d = (dry wt. of excavated

soil)/vol. of hole

Page 49: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Rubber Balloon Method

• ASTM D-2167

• Similar to above

• Vol. is measured

utilizing a rubber

balloon filled with water

Page 50: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

Nuclear Method

• Emits gamma rays

• Detects how the gamma

rays travel thru soil

• Amounts of gamma rays

detected correlate with

the unit weight of soil

Page 51: CEE 434 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN FALL 2008 GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENT METHODS PART I

V. Examples