centre for financial regulation and economic development ... the legal nature of...as it seems...

2
Home Home Contributors Contributors Machine Lawyering Machine Lawyering Centre for Financial Regulation and Economic Development Fintech Securities Law Academic Article Cryptocurrency On the Legal Nature of Cryptoassets: Waiting for On the Legal Nature of Cryptoassets: Waiting for Godot? Godot? 3 Apr 2019 3 Apr 2019 || Filippo Zatti Filippo Zatti What is the true legal nature of cryptoassets? This is a question that has been What is the true legal nature of cryptoassets? This is a question that has been echoing in my mind since I read an inspiring paper about blockchain lexicon by echoing in my mind since I read an inspiring paper about blockchain lexicon by Angela Walch. And this is also one of the two main issues that I address in my Angela Walch. And this is also one of the two main issues that I address in my recent academic article entitled “ recent academic article entitled “Entangled in Cryptoasset's Legal Nature and Entangled in Cryptoasset's Legal Nature and Governance: Searching for Clear Boundaries or Working for their Removal? Governance: Searching for Clear Boundaries or Working for their Removal? ”” I drafted the paper during my visit to the Edinburgh Law School where I was invited I drafted the paper during my visit to the Edinburgh Law School where I was invited by Professor Emilios Avgouleas and I could work with the researchers of the by Professor Emilios Avgouleas and I could work with the researchers of the Blockchain Technology Laboratory. This opportunity was particularly useful for Blockchain Technology Laboratory. This opportunity was particularly useful for learning what cryptoassets really are for cryptographers and how blockchains learning what cryptoassets really are for cryptographers and how blockchains actually work. My aim was to verify whether the different structure of blockchains – actually work. My aim was to verify whether the different structure of blockchains – permissionless or permissioned – can affect the legal nature of cryptoassets and, if permissionless or permissioned – can affect the legal nature of cryptoassets and, if so, affect blockchain governance. These are not yet settled questions. Rather, it is so, affect blockchain governance. These are not yet settled questions. Rather, it is desirable that, in each jurisdiction, in-depth legal research be done to verify desirable that, in each jurisdiction, in-depth legal research be done to verify whether the existing legal categories would be appropriate and adequate to be whether the existing legal categories would be appropriate and adequate to be applied in the crypto space. Or whether, if otherwise, we need to untangle the skein applied in the crypto space. Or whether, if otherwise, we need to untangle the skein of different interpretations through the identification of new legal categories. This of different interpretations through the identification of new legal categories. This is an inevitable knot that must be untied if we are to shape an effective and is an inevitable knot that must be untied if we are to shape an effective and functional governance of the crypto space. As functional governance of the crypto space. As Low & Teo Low & Teo have stated – correctly, in have stated – correctly, in my opinion – 'the lack of attention to private law rights hampers regulatory efforts, my opinion – 'the lack of attention to private law rights hampers regulatory efforts, as it seems obvious that regulating an obscure and enigmatic asset must pose as it seems obvious that regulating an obscure and enigmatic asset must pose greater challenges than regulating well-established asset classes with clearly greater challenges than regulating well-established asset classes with clearly defined legal characteristics'. defined legal characteristics'. If we do not succeed, we could see unintended negative effects from an incorrect If we do not succeed, we could see unintended negative effects from an incorrect categorization attempt. In a categorization attempt. In a report of the French Minister of Finance report of the French Minister of Finance , at least three , at least three of these effects are mentioned: specifically, fixing legal rules that would quickly of these effects are mentioned: specifically, fixing legal rules that would quickly become inadequate due to the rapid development of the technology, being mistaken become inadequate due to the rapid development of the technology, being mistaken about the true nature of the object being regulated, and orienting innovation efforts about the true nature of the object being regulated, and orienting innovation efforts towards escaping regulation. towards escaping regulation. As a consequence, cryptoasset governance – or perhaps, more correctly, crypto As a consequence, cryptoasset governance – or perhaps, more correctly, crypto space governance – is the second issue on which I focus my analysis. Legal scholars space governance – is the second issue on which I focus my analysis. Legal scholars have proposed a wide range of adoptable theoretical solutions. These differ have proposed a wide range of adoptable theoretical solutions. These differ according to the grade of separation that is recognized between crypto space and according to the grade of separation that is recognized between crypto space and the 'physical world'. We start from the complete separation of those 'two worlds' in the 'physical world'. We start from the complete separation of those 'two worlds' in the definition of a Cryptolaw ( the definition of a Cryptolaw (Carla Reyes Carla Reyes ), pass through the typical legal ), pass through the typical legal frameworks used in the case of autonomous systems (named here appropriately frameworks used in the case of autonomous systems (named here appropriately Lex Lex Cryptographia by Cryptographia by Aaron Wright & Primavera de Filippi Aaron Wright & Primavera de Filippi ), until we reach the far ), until we reach the far opposite side: traditional state-based regulation, although limited to payment opposite side: traditional state-based regulation, although limited to payment cryptoassets ( cryptoassets (David Fox David Fox ). ). After paying attention to the judicial cases and the special regulatory framework After paying attention to the judicial cases and the special regulatory framework already in force in a few jurisdictions, my analysis is then restrained to 'financial' already in force in a few jurisdictions, my analysis is then restrained to 'financial' cryptoassets. This was occasioned by the recently enacted Virtual Financial Assets cryptoassets. This was occasioned by the recently enacted Virtual Financial Assets Act (VFAA) in the Republic of Malta. As an EU member state, Malta’s cryptoassets Act (VFAA) in the Republic of Malta. As an EU member state, Malta’s cryptoassets regulatory scheme can be of particular interest for in-depth analysis in anticipation regulatory scheme can be of particular interest for in-depth analysis in anticipation of EU legislative provisions. The VFAA is not conclusive in the sense that it does not of EU legislative provisions. The VFAA is not conclusive in the sense that it does not fully qualify the legal nature of a cryptoasset. It aims only to identify whether fully qualify the legal nature of a cryptoasset. It aims only to identify whether Featured Posts Featured Posts The advent of bitcoin in 2009 was followed by a whole host of various cryptoassets having different features with oftentimes hybrid nature, which allo... The Dark Side of Licensing The Dark Side of Licensing Cryptocurrency Exchanges Cryptocurrency Exchanges as Payment Institutions as Payment Institutions 1 Apr 2019 Search By Categories Search By Categories Machine Learning Machine Learning Fintech Fintech Regtech Regtech Financial Regulation Financial Regulation Commercial Law Commercial Law Securities Law Securities Law Competition Law Competition Law Academic Article Academic Article Editorials Editorials Article Review Article Review Data Analytics Data Analytics Financial Economics Financial Economics Legal Education Legal Education Data Protection Data Protection Automation Automation Surveillance Surveillance Legal Practice Legal Practice Blockchain Blockchain Tokenization Tokenization Legal Tech Legal Tech Cryptocurrency Cryptocurrency Smart Contracts Smart Contracts Privacy Law Privacy Law Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity Cybersecurity Corporate Governance Corporate Governance Tax Law Tax Law Book Presentation Book Presentation Search Archive Search Archive Select Month

Upload: others

Post on 13-Oct-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Centre for Financial Regulation and Economic Development ... the Legal Nature of...as it seems obvious that regulating an obscure and enigmatic asset must poseas it seems obvious that

HomeHome AboutAbout SubmissionsSubmissions Contact UsContact Us SubscriptionSubscription ContributorsContributors

Machine LawyeringMachine Lawyering

Centre for Financial Regulation and Economic Development

Fintech Securities Law Academic Article Cryptocurrency

On the Legal Nature of Cryptoassets: Waiting forOn the Legal Nature of Cryptoassets: Waiting forGodot?Godot?3 Apr 20193 Apr 2019 || Fi l ippo Zatt iFi l ippo Zatt i

What is the true legal nature of cryptoassets? This is a question that has beenWhat is the true legal nature of cryptoassets? This is a question that has been

echoing in my mind since I read an inspiring paper about blockchain lexicon byechoing in my mind since I read an inspiring paper about blockchain lexicon by

Angela Walch. And this is also one of the two main issues that I address in myAngela Walch. And this is also one of the two main issues that I address in my

recent academic article entitled “recent academic article entitled “Entangled in Cryptoasset's Legal Nature andEntangled in Cryptoasset's Legal Nature and

Governance: Searching for Clear Boundaries or Working for their Removal?Governance: Searching for Clear Boundaries or Working for their Removal?””

I drafted the paper during my visit to the Edinburgh Law School where I was invitedI drafted the paper during my visit to the Edinburgh Law School where I was invited

by Professor Emilios Avgouleas and I could work with the researchers of theby Professor Emilios Avgouleas and I could work with the researchers of the

Blockchain Technology Laboratory. This opportunity was particularly useful forBlockchain Technology Laboratory. This opportunity was particularly useful for

learning what cryptoassets really are for cryptographers and how blockchainslearning what cryptoassets really are for cryptographers and how blockchains

actually work. My aim was to verify whether the different structure of blockchains –actually work. My aim was to verify whether the different structure of blockchains –

permissionless or permissioned – can affect the legal nature of cryptoassets and, ifpermissionless or permissioned – can affect the legal nature of cryptoassets and, if

so, affect blockchain governance. These are not yet settled questions. Rather, it isso, affect blockchain governance. These are not yet settled questions. Rather, it is

desirable that, in each jurisdiction, in-depth legal research be done to verifydesirable that, in each jurisdiction, in-depth legal research be done to verify

whether the existing legal categories would be appropriate and adequate to bewhether the existing legal categories would be appropriate and adequate to be

applied in the crypto space. Or whether, if otherwise, we need to untangle the skeinapplied in the crypto space. Or whether, if otherwise, we need to untangle the skein

of different interpretations through the identification of new legal categories. Thisof different interpretations through the identification of new legal categories. This

is an inevitable knot that must be untied if we are to shape an effective andis an inevitable knot that must be untied if we are to shape an effective and

functional governance of the crypto space. As functional governance of the crypto space. As Low & TeoLow & Teo have stated – correctly, in have stated – correctly, in

my opinion – 'the lack of attention to private law rights hampers regulatory efforts,my opinion – 'the lack of attention to private law rights hampers regulatory efforts,

as it seems obvious that regulating an obscure and enigmatic asset must poseas it seems obvious that regulating an obscure and enigmatic asset must pose

greater challenges than regulating well-established asset classes with clearlygreater challenges than regulating well-established asset classes with clearly

defined legal characteristics'.defined legal characteristics'.

If we do not succeed, we could see unintended negative effects from an incorrectIf we do not succeed, we could see unintended negative effects from an incorrect

categorization attempt. In a categorization attempt. In a report of the French Minister of Financereport of the French Minister of Finance, at least three, at least three

of these effects are mentioned: specifically, fixing legal rules that would quicklyof these effects are mentioned: specifically, fixing legal rules that would quickly

become inadequate due to the rapid development of the technology, being mistakenbecome inadequate due to the rapid development of the technology, being mistaken

about the true nature of the object being regulated, and orienting innovation effortsabout the true nature of the object being regulated, and orienting innovation efforts

towards escaping regulation.towards escaping regulation.

As a consequence, cryptoasset governance – or perhaps, more correctly, cryptoAs a consequence, cryptoasset governance – or perhaps, more correctly, crypto

space governance – is the second issue on which I focus my analysis. Legal scholarsspace governance – is the second issue on which I focus my analysis. Legal scholars

have proposed a wide range of adoptable theoretical solutions. These differhave proposed a wide range of adoptable theoretical solutions. These differ

according to the grade of separation that is recognized between crypto space andaccording to the grade of separation that is recognized between crypto space and

the 'physical world'. We start from the complete separation of those 'two worlds' inthe 'physical world'. We start from the complete separation of those 'two worlds' in

the definition of a Cryptolaw (the definition of a Cryptolaw (Carla ReyesCarla Reyes), pass through the typical legal) , pass through the typical legal

frameworks used in the case of autonomous systems (named here appropriatelyframeworks used in the case of autonomous systems (named here appropriately Lex Lex

Cryptographia by Cryptographia by Aaron Wright & Primavera de FilippiAaron Wright & Primavera de Filippi) , until we reach the far) , until we reach the far

opposite side: traditional state-based regulation, although limited to paymentopposite side: traditional state-based regulation, although limited to payment

cryptoassets (cryptoassets (David FoxDavid Fox).).

After paying attention to the judicial cases and the special regulatory frameworkAfter paying attention to the judicial cases and the special regulatory framework

already in force in a few jurisdictions, my analysis is then restrained to 'financial'already in force in a few jurisdictions, my analysis is then restrained to 'financial'

cryptoassets. This was occasioned by the recently enacted Virtual Financial Assetscryptoassets. This was occasioned by the recently enacted Virtual Financial Assets

Act (VFAA) in the Republic of Malta. As an EU member state, Malta’s cryptoassetsAct (VFAA) in the Republic of Malta. As an EU member state, Malta’s cryptoassets

regulatory scheme can be of particular interest for in-depth analysis in anticipationregulatory scheme can be of particular interest for in-depth analysis in anticipation

of EU legislative provisions. The VFAA is not conclusive in the sense that it does notof EU legislative provisions. The VFAA is not conclusive in the sense that it does not

fully qualify the legal nature of a cryptoasset. It aims only to identify whetherfully qualify the legal nature of a cryptoasset. It aims only to identify whether

Featured PostsFeatured Posts

The advent of bitcoin in 2009 wasfollowed by a whole host of variouscryptoassets having differentfeatures with oftentimes hybridnature, which allo...

The Dark Side of LicensingThe Dark Side of LicensingCryptocurrency ExchangesCryptocurrency Exchangesas Payment Institutionsas Payment Institutions1 Apr 2019

Search By CategoriesSearch By Categories

Machine LearningMachine Learning

FintechFintech

RegtechRegtech

Financial RegulationFinancial Regulation

Commercial LawCommercial Law

Securities LawSecurities Law

Competition LawCompetition Law

Academic ArticleAcademic Article

EditorialsEditorials

Article ReviewArticle Review

Data AnalyticsData Analytics

Financial EconomicsFinancial Economics

Legal EducationLegal Education

Data ProtectionData Protection

AutomationAutomation

Surveil lanceSurveil lance

Legal PracticeLegal Practice

BlockchainBlockchain

TokenizationTokenization

Legal TechLegal Tech

CryptocurrencyCryptocurrency

Smart ContractsSmart Contracts

Privacy LawPrivacy Law

Artificial Intell igenceArtificial Intell igence

CybersecurityCybersecurity

Corporate GovernanceCorporate Governance

Tax LawTax Law

Book PresentationBook Presentation

Search ArchiveSearch Archive

Select Month

Page 2: Centre for Financial Regulation and Economic Development ... the Legal Nature of...as it seems obvious that regulating an obscure and enigmatic asset must poseas it seems obvious that

cryptoassets are encompassed under EU legislation and the corresponding nationalcryptoassets are encompassed under EU legislation and the corresponding national

legislation, under the VFAA itself, or are otherwise exempt. However, to reach thatlegislation, under the VFAA itself, or are otherwise exempt. However, to reach that

goal, Malta Financial Services Authority needs to process an empirical Financialgoal, Malta Financial Services Authority needs to process an empirical Financial

Instrument Test, which reminds me – even if not properly – of the Howey TestInstrument Test, which reminds me – even if not properly – of the Howey Test

applied in the US by the Securities and Exchange Commission in the face of a lackapplied in the US by the Securities and Exchange Commission in the face of a lack

of legislative intervention by the Congress.of legislative intervention by the Congress.

The dramatic dispersal of cryptoassets that is sought through Initial Coin OfferingsThe dramatic dispersal of cryptoassets that is sought through Initial Coin Offerings

and 'exchange platforms' reminds one of the tulip bubble and the need to guaranteeand 'exchange platforms' reminds one of the tulip bubble and the need to guarantee

investors against fraud and scams. But this time seems different. Blockchain isinvestors against fraud and scams. But this time seems different. Blockchain is

something brand new due to its ubiquitous nature and the chameleon-like legalsomething brand new due to its ubiquitous nature and the chameleon-like legal

status of its output: cryptoassets. It is with this awareness that, in the conclusion ofstatus of its output: cryptoassets. It is with this awareness that, in the conclusion of

my article, I formulate a proposal in terms of address and method to be brought tomy article, I formulate a proposal in terms of address and method to be brought to

the attention of legal scholars and policy makers.the attention of legal scholars and policy makers.

Filippo ZattiFilippo Zatti, Department of Economics and Management and BABEL, University of, Department of Economics and Management and BABEL, University of

Florence, ItalyFlorence, Italy

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Copyright © 2018 All Rights Reserved. Faculty of Law, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Disclaimer Privacy Policy

Commenti: 0Ordina per

Plug-in Commenti di Facebook

Meno recenti

Aggiungi un commento...