cervical cerclage rcog2011, aboubakr elnashar

46
Cervical cerclage RCOG, 20011 Aboubakr Elnashar Benha university Hospital, Egypt

Upload: aboubakr-mohamed-elnashar

Post on 07-May-2015

1.829 views

Category:

Education


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Cervical cerclage

RCOG, 20011

Aboubakr Elnashar

Benha university Hospital, Egypt

Page 2: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Definitions Previous terminology (prophylactic, elective,

emergency, urgent: ambiguous.

More appropriate nomenclature based on indication

History-indicated cerclage Indication is history of increased risk of

spontaneous second-trimester loss or preterm

delivery.

Prophylactic measure in asymptomatic women

inserted electively at 12–14 w.

Page 3: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Ultrasound-indicated cerclage

Therapeutic measure in cases of cervical length

shortening seen on TVS.

Performed on asymptomatic women who do not

have exposed fetal membranes in the vagina.

TVS: performed between 14 and 24 w

Page 4: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Rescue cerclage A salvage measure in the case of premature

cervical dilatation with exposed fetal membranes in

the vagina.

Discovered by

ultrasound examination of the cervix or

speculum/physical examination performed for

symptoms such as vaginal discharge, bleeding or

‘sensation of pressure’.

Page 5: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Transvaginal cerclage (McDonald) Transvaginal

purse-string suture

placed at the cervicovaginal junction

without bladder mobilisation.

High transvaginal cerclage (Shirodkar) Transvaginal

purse-string suture

placed following bladder mobilisation

insertion above the level of the cardinal ligaments.

Page 6: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Transabdominal cerclage laparotomy or laparoscopy

placing the suture at the cervicoisthmic junction.

Occlusion cerclage Occlusion of the external os

placement of continuous non-absorbable suture.

{occlusion cerclage: retention of the mucus plug}.

Page 7: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

History-indicated cerclage Indications

Three or more previous preterm births and/or

second-trimester losses.

Not an indication: two or fewer previous preterm

births and/or second-trimester losses.

Previous adverse event:

(painless dilatation of the cervix or

rupture of the membranes before the onset of

contractions, or

additional risk factors, such as cervical surgery)

Not helpful in the decision to place a history-

indicated cerclage.

Page 8: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

There is insufficient evidence to recommend the

use of prepregnancy diagnostic techniques

aimed at diagnosing ‘cervical weakness’ in

women with a history of preterm birth and/or

second-trimester loss in the decision to place a

history-indicated cerclage.

Cervical resistance index (force required to dilate

the cervix to 8 mm)

hysterography or

insertion of cervical dilators.

Page 9: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Ultrasound-indicated cerclage Indication:

History of one or more spontaneous mid-

trimester losses or preterm births

before 24 w. TVS: cervix is 25 mm or less

Not indicated

without a history of spontaneous preterm delivery

or second-trimester loss who have an

incidentally identified short cervix of 25 mm or

less.

Page 10: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Not indicated

funnelling of the cervix (dilatation of the internal

os on ultrasound) in the absence of cervical

shortening to 25 mm or less.

funnelling is a function of cervical shortening and

does not appear to independently add to the risk

of preterm birth associated with cervical

length.

Page 11: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Serial sonographic surveillance

May be Indicated

history of spontaneous second-trimester loss or

preterm delivery

{cervical shortening: increased risk of subsequent

second-trimester loss/preterm birth

cervix remains long: low risk of second-trimester

loss/premature delivery}.

Page 12: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Women should be informed that expectant

management is a reasonable alternative

{there is a lack of direct evidence to support serial

sonographic surveillance over expectant

management.

majority of women with a history of second-trimester

loss/preterm delivery will deliver after 33 weeks of

gestation}.

Page 13: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Cervical cerclage in high risk groups for

spontaneous preterm delivery 1. Multiple pregnancies

history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage is not

recommended

{may be detrimental and associated with an increase

in preterm delivery and pregnancy loss}.

Page 14: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

2. Uterine anomalies

History- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage cannot be

recommended

3. Cervical surgery

cone biopsy

large loop excision of the transformation zone or

destructive procedures such as laser ablation or

diathermy or

multiple dilatation and evacuation.

Not recommended

Page 15: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

4. Radical trachelectomy

The decision to place a concomitant cerclage at

radical trachelectomy should be individualised.

{No RCT}

Page 16: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Transabdominal cerclage Indications

Previous failed transvaginal cerclage or extensive

cervical surgery.

When:

preconceptually or in early pregnancy.

Page 17: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Rescue cerclage Indications

should be individualised, taking into account

gestation at presentation

{even with rescue cerclage the risks of severe

preterm delivery and neonatal mortality and

morbidity remain high}.

A senior obstetrician should be involved in making

the decision.

Page 18: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Benefits:

delay delivery by a further 5 w on average

compared with expectant management/bed rest

alone.

two-fold reduction in the chance of delivery before

34 w.

limited data to support an associated improvement

in neonatal mortality or morbidity.

Page 19: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Failure rate:

1. High

Advanced dilatation of the cervix (>4 cm)

Membrane prolapse beyond the external os

Page 20: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

2. Gestation age:

Before 20 w

Cerclage: preterm delivery before 28 w.

Beyond 24 w

local gestational age of viability should be

considered

24 w in most developed countries

{potential risk of iatrogenic membrane rupture and

subsequent preterm delivery} rescue cerclage can

rarely be justified after this gestation.

Page 21: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Contraindications to cerclage ● active preterm labour

● clinical evidence of chorioamnionitis

● continuing vaginal bleeding

● PPROM

● evidence of fetal compromise

● lethal fetal defect

● fetal death.

Page 22: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Information given to women before cerclage potential complications

doubling in risk of maternal pyrexia but no

apparent increase in chorioamnionitis.

not associated with an increased risk of PPROM,

induction of labour or CS

not associated with an increased risk of PTL or

second trimester loss.

Page 23: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

small risk of intraoperative bladder damage,

cervical trauma, membrane rupture and bleeding

Shirodkar cerclage usually requires anaesthesia

for removal and therefore carries the risk of an

additional anaesthetic.

risk of cervical laceration/trauma if there is

spontaneous labour with the suture in place.

Page 24: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Pre operative management Investigations

Before history-indicated suture

1. first-trimester ultrasound scan

2. screening for aneuploidy

{ensure both viability and the absence of

lethal/major fetal abnormality}.

Before ultrasound-indicated or rescue

cerclage,

an anomaly scan has been performed recently.

Page 25: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

White cell count and C-reactive protein to detect

subclinical chorioamnionitis: not recommended.

{The decision to perform these tests should be

based on the overall clinical picture

in absence of clinical signs of chorioamnionitis, the

decision for rescue cerclage need not be delayed.

sensitivity and specificity are considered to be too

poor to be clinically useful}

Page 26: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

There is insufficient evidence to recommend

routine amniocentesis before rescue or ultrasound

indicated cerclage as

{no clear data demonstrating that it improves

outcome}.

Page 27: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

There is an absence of data to either refute or

support the use of amnioreduction before insertion of

a rescue cerclage.

Page 28: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

There are no studies to support immediate versus

delayed cerclage insertion in either rescue or

ultrasound-indicated procedures, but as delay can

only increase the risk of infection, immediate

insertion is likely to supersede the benefits of waiting

to see if infection manifests clinically.

The interval between presentation and suture insertion varies between

studies, with some authors advocating a period of observation to ensure

that preterm labour, abruption and infection are excluded.

Others argue that delayed insertion has the potential to increase the risk of

ascending infection; however, no comparative studies of the two strategies

exist.

Page 29: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

There is an absence of data to support genital tract

screening before cerclage insertion.

In the presence of a positive culture from a genital

swab, a complete course of sensitive antimicrobial

eradication therapy before cerclage insertion would

be recommended.

Page 30: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Operative issues Perioperative tocolysis:

no evidence to support the use of routine In most of the existing randomised studies, the majority of women

allocated cerclage also received perioperative tocolysis, most commonly

indometacin. Consequently, there is no control group available for

comparison. However, a retrospective cohort study involving 101 women

who underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage reported that the rate of

preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation was not significantly different

in women who received indometacin for 48 hours following the

procedure compared with those who did not (39% versus 34%).

Page 31: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of cerclage

should be at the discretion of the operating team.

{There are no studies of perioperative antibiotic use

in women undergoing cervical cerclage}.

Page 32: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

The choice of anaesthesia should be at the

discretion of the operating team.

{There are no studies comparing general with

regional anaesthesia for insertion of cervical

cerclage}

Page 33: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Postoperative stay:

1. Elective transvaginal cerclage can safely be

performed as a day-case procedure.

2. Women undergoing ultrasound-indicated or

rescue cerclage {higher risk of complications such

as PPROM, early preterm delivery, miscarriage and

infection} at least a 24-h

3. Transabdominal cerclage:

at least 48 h

Page 34: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

The choice of suture material should be at the

discretion of the surgeon.

The choice of transvaginal cerclage technique

(Shirodkar versus McDonald) should be at the

discretion of the surgeon.

There is no current evidence to support the

placement of two purse-string sutures over a single

suture.

There is no current evidence to support the

placement of a cervical occlusion suture in addition

to the primary cerclage.

Page 35: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Adjuvant management Bed rest

should not be routinely recommended

decision should be individualised, taking into

account the clinical circumstances and the potential

adverse effects that bed rest could have on women

and their families in addition to increased costs

{There are no studies comparing bed rest with no

bed rest}

Page 36: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

A Cochrane review of bed rest in women at high risk

of preterm delivery

Preterm birth before 37 W was similar in both

groups

Page 37: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Sexual intercourse

Abstinence from sexual intercourse following

cerclage insertion should not be routinely

recommended.

{There are no studies evaluating the effect of sexual

intercourse on the risk of second-trimester loss or

preterm delivery in women with cervical cerclage.

There is no evidence that sexual intercourse in early

pregnancy increases the risk of preterm delivery in

women with a previous preterm birth}

Page 38: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

While routine serial sonographic measurement of

the cervix is not recommended

may be useful following ultrasound-indicated

cerclage to offer timely administration of steroids or in

utero transfer. Several studies have shown a significant increase in cervical length

following the insertion of elective,

ultrasound-indicated and rescue cerclage.

A postoperative upper cervical length (closed cervix above the cerclage) of

less than 10 mm before 28 weeks of gestation appears to provide the best

prediction of subsequent preterm delivery before 36 weeks of gestation

following the placement of an ultrasound-indicated cerclage.

Page 39: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Placement of an ultrasound-indicated cerclage in

the presence of cervical length shortening cannot be

recommended as, compared with expectant

management

{it may be associated with an increase in both

pregnancy loss and delivery before 35 weeks of

gestation}.

The decision to place a rescue cerclage following an

elective or ultrasound-indicated cerclage should be

made on an individual basis, taking into account the

clinical circumstances.

Page 40: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Routine fetal fibronectin testing is not

recommended post-cerclage.

{However, the high negative predictive value of fetal

fibronectin testing for subsequent delivery at less than

30 weeks of gestation in asymptomatic high-risk

women with a cerclage in place may provide

reassurance to women and clinicians in individual

cases. However, the increased false-positive rate of

fetal fibronectin testing in such women makes the

finding of a positive result less useful}.

Page 41: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Routine use of progesterone supplementation

following cerclage is not recommended.

Page 42: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

When should the cerclage be removed?

A transvaginal cervical cerclage should be

removed before labour, usually between 36+1 and

37+0 weeks of gestation,

Elective CS: suture removal could be delayed until

this time.

Established preterm labour, the cerclage should

be removed to minimise potential trauma to the

cervix.

Page 43: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

A Shirodkar suture will usually require

anaesthesia for removal.

Transabdominal cerclage require delivery by CS

Abdominal suture may be left in place following

delivery.

Page 44: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

PPROM between 24 and 34 w and without

evidence of infection or preterm labour, delayed

removal of the cerclage for 48 hours can be

considered

{it may result in sufficient latency that a course of

prophylactic steroids for fetal lung maturation is

completed and/or in utero transfer arranged}.

Page 45: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Delayed suture removal until labour ensues or

delivery is indicated is associated with an increased

risk of maternal/fetal sepsis and is not

recommended.

PPROM before 23 and after 34w

{risk of neonatal and/or maternal sepsis and the

minimal benefit of 48 hours of latency in

Pregnancies} delayed suture removal is unlikely to

be advantageous in this situation.

Page 46: Cervical cerclage RCOG2011, Aboubakr Elnashar

Thank you