ceyda sanli , detlef lohse , and devaraj van der meer

22
Ceyda Sanli, Detlef Lohse, and Devaraj van der Meer Physics of Fluids, University of Twente, The Netherlands. om antinode clusters to node cluster The concentration dependent transition of floaters on a standing Faraday wave

Upload: tasha

Post on 23-Feb-2016

120 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

From antinode clusters to node clusters:. The concentration dependent transition of floaters on a standing Faraday wave. Ceyda Sanli , Detlef Lohse , and Devaraj van der Meer. Physics of Fluids, University of Twente , The Netherlands. Observation:. 5 mm. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

PowerPoint Presentation

Ceyda Sanli, Detlef Lohse, and Devaraj van der Meer

Physics of Fluids, University of Twente, The Netherlands.From antinode clusters to node clusters:The concentration dependent transition of floaters on a standing Faraday wave

f=19 Hza=0.1mmantinode clusters node clustersf=20 Hza=0.35 mm5 mm5 mmadding more floaters

Observation: Ref: C. Sanli, D. Lohse, and D. van der Meer, arXiv: 1202.0051 2

shakershaker Control Parameters: D = floater size = wetting angle a = amplitude

f = frequency = concentration = Area / Areafloatertotala, fSet-up: h = depth of water3 Why the node clusters at high ? Why the antinode clusters at low ?

From antinode clusters to node clusters:4Why the antinode clusters at low ?

The drift force is always towards the antinodes for our floaters.

The drift force is a single floater force. Drift force*:* G. Falkovich et. al., Nature (2005).

bubble caseheavy particle case Analogy with a static case:Why the antinode clusters at low ? On a static curved interface:heavy particles goes to a local minimum6

T is the standing wave period. Wave elevator:Why the antinode clusters at low ?The drift force is always towards the antinodes for our floaters.

The drift force is a single floater force. Drift force*:* G. Falkovich et. al., Nature (2005).

t < T/2t > T/27

Correlation number c:

antinodesnodesExperiment

Experiment

I

III

II Why the node clusters at high ? Why the antinode clusters at low ? drift force look at the experiment more carefullyFrom antinode clusters to node clusters:10antinode clusters at low node clusters at high 10 mm10 mm

breathingnon-breathingFrom antinode clusters to node clusters:11

r(t) increases & decreases at the breathing antinode clusters. r(t) is almost constant at the non-breathing node clusters.Attractive capillary interaction:airwater12

node cluster:antinode cluster:We calculate the drift and capillary energies based on designed clusters:Energy approach:13Energy approach: Observed and designed clusters

The inset bars indicate a length scale of 5 mm.

E = E - E .Energy approach:antinodenodeE is the sum of the drift and capillary energies. : surface tensionl : capillary lengthcN : number of floaters

Energy approachExperimentComparison:

16Energy approach in detail:

: surface tensionl : capillary lengthcN : number of floatersE : capillary energyE : drift energydc

The dynamics of the floaters is highly influenced by the floater concentration : low antinode clusters high node clusters Potential energy estimation of the designed clusters presents good agreement with the experiment both qualitatively and quantitatively.Conclusion: Energy approach shows that the drift with breathing is the reason behind the node clusters at high . Dynamic heterogeneity and dynamic criticality :Recent work: Macroscopic spheres on capillary Faraday waves Ref: C. Sanli, K. Saitoh, S. Luding, and D. van der Meer, arXiv: 1309.3804 a=0.1 mmf=250 Hz

=0.633 4 times slower than real time.2 mm

Back-up slides

Distances in the designed clusters:

Distances in the designed clusters: