cfrd dynamic analysis

Upload: jnf

Post on 01-Jun-2018

240 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    1/16

    Hosted by

    Black & Veatch Corporation

    GEI Consultants, Inc.

    Kleinfelder, Inc.

    MWH Americas, Inc.

    Parsons Water and Infrastructure Inc.

    URS Corporation

    21st Century Dam Design — 

    Advances and Adaptations

    31st Annual USSD Conference

    San Diego, California, April 11-15, 2011

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    2/16

    On the CoverArtist's rendition of San Vicente Dam after completion of the dam raise project to increase local storage and provide

    a more flexible conveyance system for use during emergencies such as earthquakes that could curtail the region’s

    imported water supplies. The existing 220-foot-high dam, owned by the City of San Diego, will be raised by 117

    feet to increase reservoir storage capacity by 152,000 acre-feet. The project will be the tallest dam raise in the

    United States and tallest roller compacted concrete dam raise in the world.

    The information contained in this publication regarding commercial projects or firms may not be used for 

    advertising or promotional purposes and may not be construed as an endorsement of any product or 

    from by the United States Society on Dams. USSD accepts no responsibility for the statements made

    or the opinions expressed in this publication.

    Copyright © 2011 U.S. Society on Dams

    Printed in the United States of America

    Library of Congress Control Number: 2011924673ISBN 978-1-884575-52-5

    U.S. Society on Dams

    1616 Seventeenth Street, #483

    Denver, CO 80202

    Telephone: 303-628-5430

    Fax: 303-628-5431

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Internet: www.ussdams.org

    U.S. Society on Dams

    Vision

    To be the nation's leading organization of professionals dedicated to advancing the role of dams

    for the benefit of society.

     Mission —  USSD is dedicated to:

    • Advancing the knowledge of dam engineering, construction, planning, operation,

     performance, rehabilitation, decommissioning, maintenance, security and safety;

    • Fostering dam technology for socially, environmentally and financially sustainable water 

    resources systems;

    • Providing public awareness of the role of dams in the management of the nation's water 

    resources;

    • Enhancing practices to meet current and future challenges on dams; and

    • Representing the United States as an active member of the International Commission onLarge Dams (ICOLD).

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    3/16

    Earthquake Response of Rockfill Dam 1451

    EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF ROCKFILL DAM WITH ASYMMETRIC PLAN

    GEOMETRY OF UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM SLOPE WITH RESPECT

    TO DAM AXIS

    Ik-Soo, Ha1 

    ABSTRACT

    Two-dimensional dynamic analysis for the maximum section of a dam cannot consider

    the canyon effect, because it is carried out in the plane strain condition. Also, if the plan

    geometry of upstream and downstream slope is not symmetrical with respect to the dam

    axis, the results of 2-D analyses cannot accurately represent dynamic response of the dam

    to earthquake. In this study, three-dimensional dynamic analyses for Miryang multi-

     purpose dam (concrete-faced rockfill type) in South Korea, with asymmetric plan

    geometry of upstream and downstream slope with respect to the dam axis, were carried

    out and the response of the dam was analyzed. The results of 3-D dynamic analyses were

    compared with those of 2-D plane strain dynamic analyses. It was found that themaximum settlement did not appear at the maximum cross-section and the magnitude of

    maximum settlement obtained by 3-D analysis was different from that by 2-D analysis

    for the maximum cross-section. Furthermore, it was found that the characteristics of

    acceleration amplification obtained by 3-D analysis were different from those by 2-D

    analysis. This study presents an insight in the earthquake response behaviors of a rockfill

    dam with the asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and downstream slope with respect

    to the dam axis. It can also be used as fundamental data for seismic stability and design

    for rockfill dams with asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and downstream slope.

    INTRODUCTION

    According to the previous researches (Hatanaka, 1955; Ambraseys, 1960; Makdisi, 1976),

    one of the canyon effects for dynamic response of a dam is to increase the stiffness of the

    system. This effect can increase the fundamental frequency of the dam located at the

    canyon compared to that of the dam under plane strain condition. Shown in Figure 1 is

    the ratio between first or fundamental natural frequencies computed from 3-D and 2-D

    models of the dams analyzed in the previous study (Ambraseys, 1960) as a function of

    the crest to height ratio, L/H. The fundamental frequency of the dam with a crest length

    to height ratio of more than 3 computed from 3-D model is 10 to 20 percent higher than

    those computed from a plane strain analysis of the dam. The higher frequencies obtained

    from the 3-D models are mostly the result of a stiffening effect of canyon geometry. Thus,

    two-dimensional dynamic analysis for the maximum section of a dam cannot consider thecanyon effect, because it is conducted in the plane strain condition.

    1Principal Researcher, Dam Safety Research Center, Korea Water Resources Corporation, Daejeon,

    Republic of Korea, [email protected]  

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    4/16

      21st Century Dam Design — Advances and Adaptations1452

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Dam Length/Height

      f  3 D

      /  f  2

     D

     

    Figure 1. Comparison between Natural Frequencies Computed from 2-D and 3-DAnalyses of Dams in Rectangular Canyons

    In this study, the meaning of a symmetric plan geometry of upstream and downstream

    slope with respect to the dam axis is that the length of the toe line of the upstream slope is

    almost the same as that of the downstream slope and the straight line connecting the

    center of the upstream slope toe line and the downstream slope toe line is nearly

     perpendicular to the dam axis. If the plan geometry of the upstream and downstream

    slopes of a dam does not satisfy the above condition, it is regarded as a dam with

    asymmetric plan geometry of the upstream and downstream slope with respect to the dam

    axis, as shown in Figure 2. If the plan geometry of the upstream and downstream slopes

    of a dam is not symmetrical with respect to the dam axis, the results of 2-D dynamic

    analyses using the maximum section for the dam cannot accurately represent dynamic

    response to earthquake.

    In this study, three-dimensional dynamic analysis for Miryang multi-purpose dam in

    South Korea, with asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and downstream slopes with

    respect to the dam axis, was conducted and the response (such as the settlement of the

    crest and acceleration with depth) was analyzed. The results of 3-D dynamic analysis

    were compared with those of 2-D dynamic analysis. On the basis of this comparison,

     points to be considered when evaluating the response of a dam by 2-D dynamic analysis

    were discussed.

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    5/16

    Earthquake Response of Rockfill Dam 1453

     

    Figure 2. Plan View of Miryang Dam with asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and

    downstream slope with respect to the dam axis

    SYNOPSIS OF NUMERICAL MODELING AND ANALYSIS

    Dam Profile

    The dimensions of Miryang dam are 89m in height and 394.3m in length, as shown in

    Figure 2 (plan view) and Figure 3 (cross-section). Dam type is a concrete-faced rockfill

    dam.

    Figure 3. Maximum Cross-section of Miryang Dam

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    6/16

      21st Century Dam Design — Advances and Adaptations1454

    Analysis Program and Boundary Condition

    To conduct the 3-D and 2-D dynamic analysis, FLAC3D (ver.3.1, Itasca Consulting

    Group) and FLAC2D (ver.4.0, Itasca Consulting Group) were used, respectively.

     Numerical analysis of the seismic response of surface structures such as dams requires

    the discretization of a region of the material adjacent to the foundation. The seismic inputis normally represented by plane waves propagating upward through the underlying

    materials. The boundary conditions at the sides of the model must account for the free

    field motion that would exist in the absence of the structure. The free field boundary

    condition is to enforce the free-field motion in such a way that boundaries retain their

    non-reflecting properties – i.e., outward waves originating from the structure are properly

    absorbed. As shown in Figure 4, the lateral boundaries of the main grid are coupled to the

    free-field-grid by viscous dashpots to simulate a quiet boundary.

    Figure 4. Model for Seismic Analysis of Dam and Free-field Mesh

    Input Motion

    Due to the lack of earthquake data in South Korea, time history records from other

    location (Tokachi-oki earthquake in Japan, 1968) were used for the analysis. This original

    ground motion was modified by reducing the peak acceleration, 0.17g, to 0.154g in order

    to match the Dam Earthquake Design Standard of South Korea. Figure 5 shows the input

    earthquake time history records used in this study. The input motion was assumed to act

    in the upstream-downstream direction of the dam (perpendicular to dam axis).

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    7/16

    Earthquake Response of Rockfill Dam 1455

     

    Figure 5. Input Acceleration Time History used in This Study

    Input Parameters

    A Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion and constitutive model were used to simulate the

     behavior of dam materials such as rockfill and bedrock. The parameters for static analysis

    were obtained from the Design and Construction Report and are presented in Table 1.

    After the completion of the static analysis and initialization of the displacement and

    velocities, the dynamic analysis was carried out. The material properties of bedrock for

    the dynamic analysis were obtained from Table 1, as for the static analysis.

    Table 1. Input Parameters for Static Analysis (from Design and Construction Report)

    Material Unit weight

    (kN/m3)

    Bulk modulus

    (kN/m2)

    Shear modulus

    (kN/m2)

    Friction

    angle (°)

    Cohesion

    (kN/m2)

    Rockfill zone 20 6.46E4 2.98E4 41 0

    Bed rock 26 1.67E7 1.25E7 45 2000

    For the purpose of obtaining the maximum shear modulus for rockfill material, a HWAW

    (Harmonic Wavelet Analysis of Waves) survey was conducted, as shown in Figure 6. The

    shear modulus for rockfill material was computed by the following relationship:

    '1000max,2max   mk G   σ  ⋅⋅=   ( 'mσ     in Pa) (Vrymoed, 1981) (1)

    in which Gmax= the shear modulus, in Pa, at small shear strains (10-4

    %), k 2,max = the shear

    modulus parameter at small strains (10-4

    %), and 'mσ   = the mean effective confining

     pressure, in Pa. The mean effective confining pressure was computed using the results

    from the static numerical analysis.

    In this study, for the purpose of evaluating the shear modulus of rockfill zone which must

    reflect the effect of the confining pressure with depth, the repeated 2-D static numerical

    analyses for the various k 2,max were carried out. After the completion of each static

    analysis for a certain value of k 2,max, shear moduli of 2-D model elements with depth

    were extracted, as shown in Figure 7. The extracted shear moduli were changed into

    shear wave velocities using equation (2). From this procedure, shear wave velocity

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    8/16

      21st Century Dam Design — Advances and Adaptations1456

     profiles with depth for each k 2,max can be obtained like Figure 8. From Figure 8, we can

    find that the shear wave velocity profile obtained by HWAW survey is almost similar to

    that obtained by static analysis using a k 2,max of 180. So, this value, 180, for k 2,max is

    representative of the rockfill material for 3-D dynamic analyses.

     ρ maxGv s   =   (2)

    in which = density (= / g , =unit weight, g= acceleration of gravity).

    Figure 6. HWAW Survey carried out at Miryang Dam Slope Surface and Dam Crest

    Figure 7. Extraction of Shear Moduli by Static Numerical Analysis

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    9/16

    Earthquake Response of Rockfill Dam 1457

     Figure 8. Shear Wave Velocity Profile with Depth Evaluated by HWAW Surveys and by

    Repeated Dynamic Analyses

    However, this value, 180, is not representative of rockfill material for 2-D dynamic

    analysis. In order to approximate the actual three-dimensional behaviors of the dam by

    two-dimensional techniques, the stiffness of the dam must be strengthened artificially

    (Vrymoed, 1981). That is, the shear moduli in the rockfill zone must be artificiallymodified to satisfy the condition that the fundamental frequency computed by two-

    dimensional dynamic analysis is the same as that by three-dimensional dynamic analysis.

    Therefore, to determine the shear moduli of the rockfill zone for 2-D dynamic analysis, 2-

    D dynamic analyses were repeated for various k 2,max values that were higher than 180.

    Figure 9 shows the computed acceleration time history at the crest during free vibration

    only by 3-D dynamic analysis using a k 2,max of 180 and by 2-D dynamic analysis using a

    k 2,max of 280. Figure 10 shows the FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) results for acceleration

    histories shown in Figure 9. From Figure 10, it can be found that the fundamental

    frequency of the 3-D dynamic analysis using a k 2,max of 180 is 3.3Hz and the fundamental

    frequency of 2-D dynamic analysis using a k 2,max of 280 is 2.7Hz. Also, it can be found

    that the ratio of fundamental frequency computed from the 3-D model to that from the 2-D model is about 1.2. Therefore, we can regard this value of k 2,max as the representative

    value of rockfill material for 2-D dynamic analysis.

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    10/16

      21st Century Dam Design — Advances and Adaptations1458

    -0.02

    -0.015

    -0.01

    -0.005

    0

    0.005

    0.01

    0.015

    0.02

    14.4 14.6 14.8 15 15.2 15.4 15.6 15.8 16

    tim e(sec)

     a c c e

      l e

     r a t

      i o n

      ( g

      )

    2D crest(max section)

    3D crest(max section)

     

    Figure 9. Acceleration Histories at the Crest of 2-D Maximum Section and 3-D

    Maximum Section during Free Vibration Only 

    0

    0.001

    0.002

    0.003

    0.004

    0.005

    0.006

    0.007

    0 5 10 15 20

    Frequency(Hz)

     F o u r

      i e r A m

     p  l  i t u

      d e

      ( g - s e

     

    0

    0.0005

    0.001

    0.0015

    0.002

    0.0025

    0.003

    0.0035

    0 5 10 15 20

    Frequency(Hz)

     F o u r

      i e r A m

     p  l  i t u

      d e

      ( g - s e

     

    (a) (b)

    Figure 10. Fourier Amplitude Spectra for Computed Crest Free Vibration Motion: (a) by

    2-D Dynamic Analysis, (b) by 3-D Dynamic Analysis 

    Three Dimensional and Two Dimensional Finite Difference Grid

    Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the three-dimensional finite difference grid and the two-

    dimensional finite difference grid of the Miryang dam, respectively.

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    11/16

    Earthquake Response of Rockfill Dam 1459

     

    Figure 11. Finite Difference Grid for 3-D Dynamic Analysis of Miryang Dam

    Figure 12. Finite Difference Grid for 2-D Dynamic Analysis of Miryang Dam

    RESULTS AND DISSCUSSIONS

    Settlement

    Figure 13 shows settlement time histories computed by 2-D and 3-D dynamic analyses.

    At the mid point of the crest of the dam at the maximum section, the settlement computed

     by 3-D analysis is quite similar to that by 2-D analysis. It is very interesting that the

    maximum settlement at crest midpoint of the dam did not occur at the maximum section,

    Rather, the maximum settlement occurred at the section about 50m away from the

    maximum section toward the left abutment or at the section about 50m away from the

    maximum section toward the right abutment.

    Figure 14 shows permanent settlement along the dam axis at the crest computed by 3-D

    analysis and that at the crest midpoint by 2-D dynamic analysis. We can see the same

    interesting point in Figure 14. The maximum settlement at crest midpoint occurred at thesection about ±50m away from the maximum section. Figure 15 shows the results of

    Figure 14 three-dimensionally. From Figure 14 and Figure 15, it is found that the

    settlement at the crest of a dam with asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and

    downstream slope with respect to the dam axis occurred very asymmetrically.

    From the results of Figure 11, Figure 12, and Figure 13, it is also important to note that

    the settlement at the crest of a dam with asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    12/16

      21st Century Dam Design — Advances and Adaptations1460

    downstream slope with respect to the dam axis computed by 2-D dynamic analysis using

    the maximum section might give engineers non-conservative results of the magnitude of

    the maximum crest settlement.

    Figure 13. Settlement Time Histories Computed by 2-D and 3-D Dynamic Analysis

    Figure 14. Permanent Settlement along the Dam Axis at the Crest Computed by 3-D

    Analysis and that at the crest by 2-D Analysis

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    13/16

    Earthquake Response of Rockfill Dam 1461

     

    Figure 15. Distribution of Permanent Settlement at the Crest Computed by 3-D Analysis

    Acceleration Response

    Figure 16 shows acceleration time histories for crest midpoint at each section computed

     by 3-D analyses and computed by 2-D analysis. Figure 17 shows acceleration

    amplification along the dam elevation for each section computed by 3-D dynamic

    analysis and that by 2-D dynamic analysis.

    From Figure 16 and Figure 17, it is found that the patterns of acceleration amplification

    for the dam with asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and downstream slopes with

    respect to the dam axis are similar at each section of the 3-D model and at the maximum

    section of the 2-D model but the extent of amplification is different at each section; the

    maximum amplification occurred at the maximum section. Also, it is found that if 2-D

    analysis is conducted by procedures described in this study, the characteristics of

    acceleration amplification evaluated by 2-D analysis might approximate those by 3-D

    analysis.

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    14/16

      21st Century Dam Design — Advances and Adaptations1462

    Figure 16. Acceleration Time Histories for Crest Midpoint at Each Section Computed by

    3-D Analyses and at the crest Computed by 2-D Analysis

    Figure 17. Acceleration Amplification along the Dam Elevation for Each Section

    Computed by 3-D Analyses and that by 2-D Analysis

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    15/16

    Earthquake Response of Rockfill Dam 1463

    CONCLUSIONS

    In this study, 3-D dynamic analysis for Miryang multi-purpose dam in South Korea, with

    asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and downstream slope with respect to the dam

    axis, was conducted and the response (such as the settlement of the crest and acceleration

    with depth) was analyzed. The results of 3-D dynamic analysis were compared with thoseof 2-D dynamic analysis. From the results of this research, the following conclusions

    were made:

    1.  The maximum settlement at crest midpoint of the dam did not occur at the maximum

    section. Rather, the maximum settlement occurred at the section about 50m away

    from the maximum section toward the left abutment or at the section about 50m away

    from the maximum section toward the right abutment. The settlement at the crest of a

    dam with asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and downstream slope with respect

    to the dam axis occurs very asymmetrically. It is also important to note that the

    settlement at the crest of a dam with asymmetric plan geometry of upstream and

    downstream slope with respect to the dam axis computed by 2-D dynamic analysisusing the maximum section may give non-conservative results.

    2.  The patterns of acceleration amplification for the dam with asymmetric plangeometry of upstream and downstream slope with respect to the dam axis are similar

    at each section along the dam axis of the 3-D model and at the maximum section of

    the 2-D model, but the extent of amplification is different at each section; the

    maximum amplification occurred at the maximum section. If two-dimensional

    analysis is conducted by the procedures described in this study, the characteristics of

    acceleration amplification evaluated by 2-D analysis might approximate those by 3-D

    analysis.

    ACKKNOWLEDGEMENT

    This study was supported by a grant from the Construction Technology Innovation

    Program (CTIP) funded by the Minister of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs

    (MLTM) of the South Korean government. This financial assistance is gratefully

    acknowledged. Special thanks are to John Stoessel and Tom Brown for their revisions and

    helpful suggestions.

    REFERENCES

    Ambrasey, N.N., “On the shear response of a two dimensional wedge subjected to an

    arbitrary disturbance,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 50, pp.45-

    56, 1960.

    Hatanaka, M., “Fundamental considerations on the earthquake resistant properties of the

    earth dam,” Bulletin No. 11, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto Univ., Japan,

    1955.

  • 8/9/2019 CFRD Dynamic Analysis

    16/16

      21st Century Dam Design — Advances and Adaptations1464

    Itasca, “FLAC – Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, Version 4.0, user’s guide,”

    Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2000.

    Makdisi, F.I., “Performance and analysis of earth dams during strong earthquake,”

    Thesis presented of the University of California at Berkeley, 1976.

    Mejia, L.H. and Seed, H.B., “Three dimensional dynamic response analysis of earth

    dams,” Report No. UCB/EERC-81/15, Univ. of California, Berkeley, California, 1981.

    Vrymoed, J., “Dynamic FEM model of Oroville dam,” Journal of Geotechnical

    Engineering, Vol. 107, No. 8, pp.1057-1077, 1981.