ch. 3 : national income determination (ii) (simple keynesian model)

58
Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Upload: annice-janel-lyons

Post on 28-Dec-2015

242 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II)

(Simple Keynesian Model)

Page 2: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

C=Ca + cYd

C

Y

Page 3: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

I=Ia

Y

I

Page 4: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

G=Ga

Y

G

Page 5: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

X=Xa

Y

X

Page 6: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

T=Ta

Y

T

Page 7: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

M=Ma + mY

Y

M

Page 8: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

AE=C+I+G+(X-M)

Y

AE

Y*

Page 9: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Y

$

I+G+X

S+T+M

Y*

Page 10: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Fiscal Policy

• Discretionary Fiscal Policy

• expansionary fiscal policy

• (1) increased government spending,

• (2) lower taxes, or

• (3) a combination of the two.

Page 11: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

• contrationary fiscal policy

• (1) decreased government spending,

• (2) higher taxes, or

• (3) a combination of the two.

Page 12: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

• Problems of Fiscal Policy1. Recognition Lag

2. Executive Lag

3. Response Lag

Page 13: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Changing Government Expenditure or Taxes?

• 1. Location of Effects

• 2. Time Lag

• 3. The Reversibility of the Policy

• 4. The Public’s Reaction to Short-term Changes

Page 14: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Built-in stabilisers

• Built-in stabilisers are those institutional arrangements that automatically increase government deficit (or decrease surplus) during slumps/recessions, and increase surplus (or decrease deficit) during booms, without the government having to make any policy decision.

Page 15: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Examples of built-in stabilizers

• Progressive Tax System

• Welfare Scheme

• Government Purchases

• Corporate and Family Savings

Page 16: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Some built-in stabilizers that may create disincentives:

• progressive taxation

• unemployment and welfare benefits

Page 17: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Some built-in stabilizers that do not create disincentives:

• corporate savings

• family savings

Page 18: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Limitations of built-in stabilizers:

• Built-in stabilisers can reduce fluctuations but cannot maintain full stability.

• built-in stabilisers may reduce the speed of recovery

Page 19: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Balanced-Budget Multiplier

• C=Ca+cYd

• G=Ga

• I=Ia

• T=Ta

Page 20: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

• The government expenditure multiplier: Kg=1/(1-c)

• The tax multiplier : Kt=-c/(1-c)

• The balanced-budget multiplier: Kb=1/(1-c) + -c/(1-c)

=1

Page 21: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Ga by $1 will increase income by: 1+MPC+MPC2+MPC3 ......---(1)

Ta by $1 will decrease income by: MPC+MPC2+MPC3 ......---(2)

Ga - Ta = 1

Page 22: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Recessionary (Deflationary) Gap and Fiscal Policy

AE

YYe Yf

AE

AE’

Page 23: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Inflationary Gap and Fiscal Policy

AE

YYf Ye

AE’

AE

Page 24: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Paradox of Thrift

• Thriftiness, while a virtue for the individual, is disastrous for an economy.

Page 25: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

• If consumers seek to save a larger amount out of any given level of income, that attempt to save more may lead to a fall in income leaving the amount of savings unchanged or even decreased.

Page 26: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Case 1: Investment expenditure is autonomous

Given: S = -Ca+(1-c)Y

I =Ia

Page 27: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

The Paradox of Thrift

I,S

I=Ia

S1

Y1

S2

Y2

Y

Page 28: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Example

• S1=-20+(1-0.75)Y

• I=20

Page 29: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

• At equilibrium,

• I=S

• 20=-20+(1-0.75)Y

• 40=0.25Y

• Y=160

Page 30: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

the realized saving is:

S1=-20+(1-0.75)Y

=-20+0.25(160)

=-20+40

=20

Page 31: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Suppose the saving function shifts upward,

S2=-10+(1-0.75)Y

I=20

Page 32: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

At equilibrium,

I=S

20=-10+(1-0.75)Y

30=0.25Y

Y=120

Page 33: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Now the realized saving is:

S2=-10+(1-0.75)Y

=-10+0.25(120)

=-10+30

=20

Page 34: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Case 2: Investment expenditure is an increasing function of national income

• Given: S = -Ca+(1-c)Y

• I = Ia+eY

Page 35: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

The Paradox of Thrift

I,S

I=Ia+eY

S1

Y1

S2

Y2

Y

Page 36: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

How the paradox can be resolved?

• If planned investment increases as a result of the increase in planned saving, then there may not be a decrease in national output.

Page 37: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

The Paradox of Thrift

I,S

I=Ia

S1

Y1

Y

Page 38: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

The Paradox of Thrift

I,S

I=Ia

S1

Y1

S2

YY2

Page 39: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

The Paradox of Thrift

I,S

I=Ia

S1

Y1

S2

Y

I=Ia’

Y2

Page 40: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

The Paradox of Thrift

I,S

I=Ia

S1

Y1

Y

Page 41: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

The Paradox of Thrift

I,S

S1

Y1

S2

Y2

Y

I=Ia+eY

Page 42: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

The Paradox of Thrift

I,S

I=Ia’+eYS1

Y1

S2

Y2

Y

I=Ia+eY

Page 43: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Revision Exercise

• What is the 'paradox of thrift'? Explain, with the aid of diagrams, how this paradox can be resolved.

• Compare the magnitudes of the income multipliers of the simple Keynesian model under the following tax systems: lump sum income tax, proportional income tax and progressive tax.

•  

Page 44: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

• What are “automatic stabilizers”? Give two examples to illustrate your answer.

• Compare the effectiveness of the proportional income tax and the progressive income tax in reducing economic instability.

Page 45: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

'Consumption depends on the level of income.'

'The level of income depends on consumption.'

With the aid of diagrams, reconcile these two statements with reference to the Keynesian model.

Page 46: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Answer:• In the consumption curve, consumption is a

function of the level of income. As income increases, consumption will also increase. In the Keynesian model, the consumption is assumed to be: C = a + c Y where a is the intercept and c is the marginal propensity to consume.

• If the consumption curve shifts upward, the level of income will be increased because of the increase of aggregate demand in the economy. Therefore the level of income depends on consumption.

• There is no circular reasoning: it is a case of mutual determination of income and consumption. Mutual dependence is not an inconsistency.

Page 47: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

• Consider the following information about Country A:

C = 0.8Yd

I = 260

G = 400

T = 0.5Y

X = 300M = 0.2Y

Page 48: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Find:

i. the equilibrium level of national income

ii. the income multiplier

iii. the tax multiplier

Page 49: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Answer• a. Find the equilibrium income.• In equilibrium, Y = AE• Y = C + I + G• = 400 + 0.8(Y-T) + 50 + 32• = 482 + 0.8(Y - 40 - 0.375Y)• = 450 + 0.5Y• 0.5Y = 450• Y = 900

• In equilibrium, Y = 900

Page 50: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

b. b. Find the income multiplier.

 Income multiplier = 1/(1-c-ct)

= 1/[1-0.8+(0.8)(0.375)]

= 2 

The income multiplier is equal to 2.

Page 51: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

c.

Given that the existing income level is 900, and that the income multiplier is 2, the government has to increase its expenditure by 50 for full employment to be attained.

Page 52: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Consider the following information:Labour force (L) = 600

Production function = 3L

Find:

i. the full-employment income level

ii. the no. of labour that is unemployed

Page 53: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

Suppose the government is planning to increase her expenditure in order to stimulate the economy. How much expenditure should the government increase to achieve full-employment?

Page 54: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

In a closed economy, private consumption (C), investment (I), government expenditure (G), transfer payments (TR) and tax revenue (T) are as follows:

C = 50 + 0.8Yd

I = 50

G = 100

TR = 50

T = 0.25Y

Page 55: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

a.

(i) What is the equilibrium value of Y? 

(ii) What is the value of the multiplier for government expenditure?

(iii) What is the balance of the government budget?

Page 56: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

b. Assume that government expenditure is now increased by 20, from 100 to 120.

If the government wants to pursue a balanced budget, what should be the amount of transfer payments?

Page 57: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

AL Questions

Page 58: Ch. 3 : National Income Determination (II) (Simple Keynesian Model)

AL 2000/5

AD, X, M

Y

X

C+I+G+X-M

450

trade deficitM

(C+I+G+X-M)’

Y* Y**

A

B

C

D