challenges and opportunities facing the uc system academic business officers group provost m.r.c....
DESCRIPTION
Key features of the Master Plan (2) Differentiation of mission & functions –to ensure quality and efficient allocation of resources –limits the no. of campuses offering high-cost doctoral and professional education programs –greater focus on undergraduate education at CSU and CCCs –cost structure enables universal accessTRANSCRIPT
Challenges and OpportunitiesFacing the UC System
Academic Business Officers GroupProvost M.R.C. Greenwood
April 4, 2005
Key features of the Master Plan (1)
• Principle of access– to all who can benefit– state’s responsibility to fund access
• Differential admissions pools – to ensure high standards and to encourage students to take
lower division at the community colleges
• Community college transfer– ensures universal access and route to 4-year segments– 60:40 ratio to preserve access for all eligible transfers
Key features of the Master Plan (2)
• Differentiation of mission & functions
– to ensure quality and efficient allocation of resources– limits the no. of campuses offering high-cost doctoral
and professional education programs – greater focus on undergraduate education at CSU
and CCCs– cost structure enables universal access
Differentiation of function: UC
• State’s primary academic agency for research
• Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education
• Sole authority for doctoral degrees (CSU able to offer joint doctorates)
• Sole authority for instruction in law, medicine, dentistry, and veterinary medicine
Differentiation of function: CSU
• Undergraduate education, graduate, and professional education through the Master’s degree
• Teacher education• Faculty research consistent with the primary
mission of instruction• Doctorates jointly with UC or an independent
institution
Differentiation of function:Community Colleges
• Academic & vocational instruction through the first two years of undergraduate education (lower division)
• Remedial instruction• English as Second Language (ESL) courses• Adult noncredit instruction• Community service courses • Workforce training services
299% 311%
439%
130%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
400%
450%
500%
CaliforniaPopulation
High schoolgraduates
Undergraduateenrollment (4-
year segments)
Degreesawarded (BA/BS)
Percent changes, California 1958 to 2002
Indicators of concern
• Proportion of 24-year-olds with a degree in natural sciences or engineering: U.S. was 3rd in the world in 1975, 17th today
• CA 8th graders: last in the country on science tests, 7th from bottom in math
• CA has 16% of the nation’s high-tech jobs, but only 9% of nation’s S&E degrees
• K-12 inequities reflected in large numbers of math, science teachers w/o credential
UC eligibility rates (2003)
Statewide 14.4%
Asian American 31.4%White 16.2%Latino 6.5%African American 6.2%
Undergraduate
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003
Health SciencesGraduate
Enrollment growth 1958-2003
UC is below others in percent graduate
34%43%
23%
59%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
UC All 8ComparisonUniversities
PublicComparisonUniversities
PrivateComparisonUniversities
All graduate students as a percent of total enrollment
Health Sciences