change management on royal mail
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
1/16
Submitted for the module Change Managementfor the award of Masters in Business
Administration.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT.
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
2/16
1
PLANNED AND
IMPLEMENTED
CHANGE WITHIN
A BUSINESS
ENVIRONMENT
(EVALUATION ON
ROYAL MAIL
GROUP)CHANGE MANAGEMENT.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This report represents factual components and the nature of
change appreciated by Royal Mail group in light to meet
modernidsation requirements. With reference to theoretical
concepts, this report further evaluates the effectiveness of change
examined by Royal Mail. In addition, this report appraises key
management models scoped down towards the indicative contents
of this report. Further instated in this report are facts
conceptualized to focus on organizational development and
(Rantala, 2013) (Crew & Brennan, 2014) (Clarkson, 2011)
SHIBIN SCHERI NP134875
Date: 21Feb - 2014
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
3/16
2
recognizing resistance to change and sustaining organizational effectiveness. Primary data
discussing the indicative factors of Royal Mails downfall are extracted and summarized from
independent reviews by Hooper, et al.(2008) and Hooper (2010) in order to conceptulize pertinet
facts and in depth analysis of Royal Mails Change Situation, however an updated review of
effectivness of this change shall be examined further in this report using key change
management models and concepts. This report also explains limitations observed during the
progression of this report.
OBJECTIVES:
1. Evaluate and examine and the reasons for change required by Royal Mail.
2. Investigate the effectiveness of the process of change that was planned and implemented
for maintaining sustainability for Royal Mail.
3. Evaluate the resistant factors to the emergent changes discussed above.
4. Evaluate whether the proposed change policies have been deemed commendable so far.
5. Recommendations for the improvement of the change process.
CURRICULUM OF ROYAL MAIL (INVESTIGATING THE
REQUIREMENT FOR CHANGE).
In light to the requirement of this report, this Report scopes all its observations on to the change
context and situation of the Royal Mail Group. Independent reviews by Richard Hooper (2008 &
2010) summarizes contextual key change factors scoping the contents of requirements for this
report. Stated firmly, Royal Mails postal service faced substantial threats and was advised to
meet modernidsation policies to meet stakeholders expectations. While Hooper, et al. (2008)
firmly observes that universal postal services remain highly significant, Hooper (2010) reserves
that royal mail has declined its market shares with further financial health of Royal Mail been
shattered. The independent review by Hooper (2010) further states significant causes that
destabilized Royal Mails sustainability:
Decline in Royal Mails market shares.
Decline in Universal Postal Services.
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
4/16
3
Resistance in implementing modernidsation policies.
Increase in pension deficit since 2008.
Expired policies and regulatory regime.
With such desolation, Royal Mail needs to observe that Royal Mails downfall in market adversely
gives enough market stage for competitors to enter. Furthermore, letter volumes were observed
to decline further more in the future as reasoned with internet communication and digital media
acceleration (Hooper, 2010; Clarkson, 2011; Rantala, 2013; Crew & Brennan, 2014). While
Royal Mail was noted to sustain on packets and parcels, it is to be understood that relatively,
packets and parcels represent a small and competitve scale than letter volumes, predominatly
causing the decline in letter volumes eminent. In light to this desolative concern, Royal mail was
disciplined to inject private sector discipline in order to sustain its operational services. While
Hoopers report (2010) insited in developing new regulatory regime for Royal Mail, it is to benoted that Postcomm is now acquired by Ofcom, an independent regualtor and competition
authority for the UK communications industries (Ofcom, 2011) and now operates all the
regulatory regime for Royal Mail. In addition, Hoopers review (2010 ) further urges the
government to relieve Royal Mail from its pension deficit as a part of wider package of measures,
however in 2013 (Thurley, 2013) the government transferred Royal Mails historic liabilities to a
new public sector scheme called RMPS (Royal Mail Statutory Pension Scheme) and is
requested by the government to adminsiter further on. On a broader note, these private sector
disciplines were injected in light to meet future sustainbility for Royal Mail. Hooper (2010) further
supports that privatised capital will favor Royal Mail from being excluded from political
interventions and commercial decisions. With primary analysis declared by HOOPER, et al.
(2008), Royal Mail was concluded to have detroited financial health. In this perspective, private
sector capital can futher generate cash to finance modernisation needs; thereby urging the need
for change in its management and operations. In order to elaborate an understanding of Royal
Mails change situation, this report will nowdeploy Kurt Lewins Force field analysis (Burnes,
2007).
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
5/16
4
While intertwining the factorial data by Hooper (2010) into Kurt Lewins force field analysis, it is
observed that the driving factors exceed over the resisting factors of the change. Kurt Lewin
explains that when organization is set for change, it must objectivise its driving factors againest
its resisting factors of change. If the resisting factors of an organisation exceeds more than the
driving factors, the organisation is not ready for a change to flow down in its operational and
management structure. In this case, Royal Mail experiences heavy driving forces for change,
making it necessary for accelrated modernisation policies to be implmented to maintain
sustiainiblity for its business operations. One major deduction from Hooper et al (2008) and
Hooper (2010) reviews were about the reduction of revenues due to the inception of 5% weighted
avereage increases by Royal Mail in 2007 to 2008. The accelration of ESubstitutes and digital
media has developed a predesivce choice for customers as a faster means of communication.
In comparison with European countries, the justification for the 5% weighted average may sound
geniuine however, the accelration of e-substitutes was forcasted to cause severe turmoil in letter
volumes adversly affecting one of its core business operations (Hooper et al., 2008) Hooper et
al (2008) further suggested to implement pricing strategy to stimulate certain growth. Failure to
meet modernisation policies led Royal Mail loose its competitve position to its competitors.
Hooper et al., (2008) further declares that lack of upgrades were observed in their network of
delivery offices and mail centers. With 70% of mails being sorted by machines, the automation
Royal
Mail
Overall financial health of Royal Mail
Failure to meet modernidsation policies
Decline in letter volumes.
Decline in overall market Shares
Lack of expertise in technological
ada tation.
Resistance from Common Workers Union
(CWU).
Recession.
FIGURE 1: KURT LEWINS FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS:SOURCE: BURNES (2007)
DIVING FACTORS TO CHANGE RESISTING FACTORS
Common resistance to privatization
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
6/16
5
status of Royal mail was deemed to be low when compared to European countries who serves
95% of Automation process. As mentioned earlier, the uprising of digital media has caused a fall
of -3.2% in letter volumes in 2007. With Pension deficit being unresolved at that moment, Royal
Mails financial status eventually detrioted, losing its 350 year monopoly in the UK postal market.
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CHANGE PLANNED AND IMPLEMENTED FOR
MAINTAINING SUSTAINABILITY FOR ROYAL MAIL:
The effectiveness of Royal Mails privatization is the essential objective of this section the report.
Therefore the following influential observation will help deduce the effectiveness of privatization
of Royal Mail. This section of the report is further divided in to two sub sections in order to
produce an organized findings of the evaluation.
Planned Change on Royal Mail:
On broad reference with Royal Mail Holdings plc (BERR, 2009) and Hooper (2010), three major
extents were identified for Postal Services Bill to address:
1. Regulation: Currently, Ofcom (Ofcom, 2011) is responsible in regulating further financial
sustenance for the Universal postal service (UPS), providing new access regime and expanding
competition law powers to the UK postal market (BERR, 2009).
2. Pensions:Currently, the government transferred Royal Mails historic liabilities and pension
deficits to a new public sector scheme called RMPS and is requested by the government toadminister further on (Thurley, 2013).
3. Strategic Alliance: In order to maintain Royal Mails sustainability, Hooper (2010) concludes in
his review that Royal Mail has to achieve modernidsation objectives and additional obligatory
legislations for the current government to peddle over minority stakes (BERR, 2009). With new
regulatory regime being taken over today and in consideration with CWU, Royal mails universal
postal service will remain public sector, partprivatized. Further financial regime apart from the
pension deficit will be supported by Ofcom (2011).
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
7/16
6
Burnes (2004) advocates that planned change (originally coined by Kurt Lewin (Schein, 1996))
was developed to distinguish change that was intentionally planned, analyzed and executed by
an Organization in order to
maintain its competitive
sustainability. Royal Mail can
be coined towards planned
change as structural and
strategic propositions were
developed in order to save
Royal Mails UPS. In addition,
this report wishes to scope on Kurt Lewins three step model (Burnes, 2004) in comparison to
Royal Mails change situation. The three step model refers to three consecutive steps; moving
from a fixed state (Unfreezing), moving through a progressive alteration (Moving), and on to
another fixed status (Refreezing) (See figure 2 above). Considering Royal Mails restraining
forces, Kurt Lewins three step model implies that restraining forces such as CWU, resistance to
privatization etc. are to be bought in salient agreement, implying the Unfreeze step;
Implementation of modernidsation policies and other technological automations are made in
motion since the coalition agreement in 2010 (BBC 2010); this can be considered as the Moving
state; and refreeze can be the omega step to deduct the stability of the proposed change. In the
case of Royal Mail, progress are yet to observed as it was just recently that CWU has come withagreement terms after several disputes with the privatization disciplines (Farrell, 2013).
Effectiveness of the Planned Change in Royal Mail:
As per the observation of this report, following key aspects were deducted from reliable
resources that will deduct current effectiveness of the planned change in Royal Mail.
1. Agreement between Royal Mail and CWU: While crucial disputes over pay and
compensation regimes were observed ever since Royal Mails post privatization
proposals were made between Royal Mail and the CWU, Farrell (2013) reports that
Royal Mail staff will now receive 9% increase over three years duration. This can be
considered as groundbreaking legal agreement on industrial relations at the newly
privatised firm. In addition, 139000 Royal Mail staffs will now receive one off 200
payment on December, down a 100 from the previous agreement. In addition, Royal
FIGURE 2: KURT LEWINS THREESTEP MODEL;
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
8/16
7
Mail has further agreed to CWU;s demands on job security, pensions and other terms
and conditions applicable in next five years. The deal consists of:
No Outsourcing of Royal Mails business (Farell, 2013).
A prohibition on zerohours contracts for Royal Mail Staff (Farell, 2013).
Full time workforce with no compulsory redundancies (Farell, 2013).
No relegates to employees agreed working conditions.
Additional payments to employees pension scheme by Royal Mail(Farell, 2013).
However in return, CWU was urged to proceed with measures to prevent local surges
of strikes. Farell (2013) and PWC (2013) ironically forecasts fuelling use of internet and
online shopping to surge soon and with a co-operative agreement between Royal Mail
and CWU, this co-operation would underpin expansion of the packages and parcels
segment along with the usage of proposed automation for Royal Mails modernidsation
sustainability (BERR, 2009; CWU, 2010). According to Farell (2013), the 330p
valuation of Royal Mail shares in the firms flotation in October 2013 (Roland, et al.,
2013) was the prime risk associated to the national strike. Referring back to Kurt
Lewins three step model, this phase can be coined as Unfreeze to Moving phase. In
addition, Bernes (2004) suggestes punctuated equlibrium, a type of change that
recognises the erratic and volatile nature of change. Royal Mail was categorised to
have undergone through puntuated equlibrium change as the company faced severe
turmoil during its post privatization propositions and it was recently that royal mail
and the CWU came under legal mutual agreements (Farell, 2013).
2. Online Parcel Upsurge and Slow Projection of Letter Volumes: With UK total inland
letter volumes declined by 6.3% from 20082013, the parcel volume further generated
3.7% growth from 2008 2013 (PwC, 2013). This signifies that the rate of online
shopping by consumers have been observed to been increased at a par rate than the
letter volume. In addition to this, Sky News (2014) reports Royal Mail has experienced
an 8% rise in revenue from Parcel delivery since its privatization. According to Pwc
(2013), the propensity of letter volume will project decline however observed to be of
slow projections. The Pwc (2013) further elaborates that declaration that conceptually
paperloyal consumers portray higher value of communication. Uncertain changes
in demographics and acceleration of digital media are concluded to pose less threat in
this segment. In addition to this the report further declares that the decline in letter
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
9/16
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
10/16
9
2009). However, Farrell (2013) in favor corresponds the agreement between CWU and Royal
Mail will now deem to be profitable for the Universal postal Service (SkyNews, 2014).
RESISTANCE FROM CWU:
With several references mentioned regarding the industrial disputes between Royal Mail and
CWU (CWU, 2010; BBC, 2013; Thurley, 2013), and in reference with the above observations of
this report, it can be assumed that CWU should now possess moderate resistance to Royal Mail.
With statements being declared on the pension deficit (Thurley, 2013) and CWU settlements,
Royal Mail can now take the pride of implementing co-operative modernidsation policies in order
to maintain the sustainability for Royal Mail s operations.
CONCLUSION: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE
OVERALL CHANGE IN ROYAL MAIL:
With Royal Mails competitive position sinking in the UK postal market, the strategy of
privatization can be deemed commendable. Despite the vigorous industrial dispute between the
CWU and Royal Mail as mentioned previously, Royal Mail was successful to establish peace
terms with its staff regarding the stated settlements. The case of resistance observed in Royal
Mail was eminently strong as the liabilities occurred by Royal Mail were concluded to be
Nationalized, with no further clarifications to resolve such deficit. However, dynamic inferences
were implemented despite the forecasted resistance from Royal Mail Staffs. As stated by
Robbins & Judge (2010), Resistance can be defined immediate, deffered or implicit regardless
of its generic suppositions. Among these, implicit and deferred resistance can be deemed most
challenging for an organization. Royal Mail suffered an implicit resistance from the CWU and
Royal Mail staff regarding its post privatization propositions. Historically, poor industrial
relations between Royal Mail and CWU were also recorded (Hooper et al., 2008) and further
implmentation of privatization discplines only created a bigger turmoil. However, efforts
developed and deducted from various sources define the positive inception of Royal Mailsprivatised business operations. Neverthless, it is desolative that co-operative industial
agreements were settled just recently between Royal Mail and CWU which leaves a lacking
query to conclude a specific statement of wether or not the privatisation was a intellective move.
So far, the conclusions adhered in this report clarify that Royal Mails privatization effectiveness
was observed to be commendable even through the huge turmoil of preclaimed liabilities and
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
11/16
10
indutrial disputes. Referring back to Kurt Lewins three step model, the Unfreeze and
move/change are observed be to achieved by Royal Mail, however the refreeze phase is yet
to be cited.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Royal Mail must understand that the route cause for delay in the modernidsation process
was the CWU settlement. Royal Mail must take restrained steps in order to maintain a
balance with the current regulatory regime proposed by Ofcom (2012) and positive
relationship with CWU.
2. As mentioned previously, Royal Mail must update its progress on the proposed
technological automation for sorting the parcels segment. This will Royal Mail to gain
back its competitive position from its existing rivals.3. Lack of expertise in technological adaptation must be considered as strategic issue. With
rising usage of digital media, Royal Mail must explore different strategies to tap the talent
pool to retain commendable expertise to adapt with technological automation proposed
by Royal Mail. Royal Mail must also recollect five postmodernidsation terms which both
CWU and Royal Mail has agreed upon before further implementing this talent acquisition
strategy.
4. In reference to common privatization resistance, Robbins & Judge (2010) and Rantala
(2013) suggests to invest substantially in training and development in order to infuse
Royal Mails current staff with the proposed technological automations. This would help
Royal Mail in barricading the search for external talent and rather focus on developing
internal talent, which mutually benefits Royal Mail and its staff.
5. Ofcom must constantly regualte the financial regime of Royal Mail in order to create
competitor power over the UK postal market industry.
LIMITATIONS:
1. The change case of Royal Mail is an interesting and influential case to refer. However,
due to the delay of the expendable disputes in last few years between Royal Mail and
CWU, it is declared that the information deduced in this report can be assumed
generalized as it is yet to discover the potentiality of Royal Mails privatization.
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
12/16
11
2. Resource database allocated for this report, Moodle (Supportive Dashboard for Students
to use online resources) constantly faced disturbance, disrupting collection of further
statistical data to validate the conclusions of this report.
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
13/16
12
REFERENCES
BBC, 2010. Royal Mail part - privatisation planned by coalition. BBC: Business, 20 May, p.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10130415.
BBC, 2013. Royal Mail Privatisation in the coming weeks'. BBC: Business, 12 September, pp.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24058989.
BERR, 2009. Royal Mail Holdings plc: Reports and Accounts year ended 29 march 2009, s.l.:Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. .
Burnes, B., 2004. Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Dynamics. Business &
Economics ed. s.l.:Pearson Education .
Burnes, B., 2007. Kurt Lewin and The Harwood Studies the Foundations of OD. Journal of Applied
Behavioral Sceince, 43(2), pp. 213-231.
CBE, R. H., 2010. Saving Royal Mail's Universal Postal Service in the Digital Age., Surrey : Crown
Copyright.
CBE, R. H., Hutton, D. D. & Smith, I. R., 2008. Mordnise or Decline: Policies to maintain the universal
postal service in the United Kingdom, s.l.: Crown Copyright.
Clarkson, K., 2011. Postal Service case as it strives to sustain business operations, s.l.: GRIN.
Consumer Focus, 2012. Royal Mail's Quality of Service 2011/ 12, s.l.: ConsumerFocus.
Crew, M. & Brennan, T., 2014. The Role of the Postal and Delivery Sector in a digital age.
s.l.:books.google.com.
CWU, 2010. Business Transformation 2010 and Beyond: A National Agreement Between Royal Mail &
the Communication Workers' Union.,
http://www.cwu.org/assets/_files/documents/mar_10/cwu__1268063930_Business_Transformation_-
_2010.pdf: CWU.
Farrell, S., 2013. Royal Mail Workers Win Pay Increase of 9% Over Three Years.. The Guardian: UK
news: Business, 9 December, pp. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/09/royal-mail-
workers-pay-increase.
Farrell, S., 2014. Royal Mail Staff win 'Groundbreaking' deal on jobs, pensions and practices.. The
Guardian: Business., 05 Februaury., pp. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/05/royal-mail-
deal-jobs-pensions-cwu-dave-ward.
Hooley, G. J., Saunders, J. A. & Piercy, N., 2004. Marketing Strategy and Competitive Positioning.
Business & Economics ed. 622 pages: Pearson Education: .
Ofcom, 2011. Postal Services. [Online]Available at: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/post/
[Accessed 10 Feb 2014].
Ofcom, 2012. Review of Regulatory Conditions: Postal Regulations, s.l.: Ofcom.
Prince, R., 2009. Royal Mail warns staff to expect a pay freeze.. The Telegraph: Finance: Recession,
24 April , pp. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/recession/5215678/Royal-Mail-warns-staff-to-expect-a-
pay-freeze.html.
PwC, 2013. The Outlook for UK Mail Volumes to 2023, s.l.: PwC Strategy & Economics.
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
14/16
13
Rantala, O., 2013. Development of Postal Servivces until 2020, s.l.: ideas.repec.org.
Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A., 2010. Organizational Behavior. Business & Economics 13th Ed ed.
s.l.:Prentice Hall.
Roland, D., Chan, S. P. & Martin, B., 2013. Royal Mail share float: as it happened. Business News and
Markets Live., 11 10, pp. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/business-news-markets-
live/10371566/Royal-Mail-share-float-as-it-happened-October-11-2013.html.
Schein, E. H., 1996. Kurt Lewin's Change Theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a
model of managed Learning.. Systems Practice, 9(1), pp. 27 - 47.
SkyNews, 2014. Royal Mail Rides The Online Parcel Wave.. Business, 2014 January, p. 1.
Thurley, D., 2013. Royal Mail Pension Plan - Commons Library Standard Note. [Online]
Available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN04940/royal-
mail-pension-plan
[Accessed 10 Feb 2014].
Todnem, R., 2005. Organisational Change management: A critical review. Journal of Change
Management., 5(4), pp. 369 - 380.
ANNEXURE1: PRESENTATION REPORT:
In light to the requirement of this assessment, a presentation on Change Analysis of Royal Mail
was conducted on the 10th of January 2014 for a duration of 8 minutes. The presentation
however concluded a schematic analysis of change on Royal mail, but failed to have presented
a more updated research, thereby making it necessary to prepare an updated report prior to this
Annexure. The objectives of this presentation were:
To investigate and analyze the context and change situation for Royal Mail Group (RMG).
To evaluate the change situation of Royal Mail using key change management models.
Presentation reported four contextual factors describing Royal Mails historical market position
namely:
Downfall of market shares. Decline in Modernization.
Pension Deficit in March 2008.
Turmoil in current regulatory scheme.
Next, the report en-stated the change need on Royal Mail, following points were noted:
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
15/16
14
Rapid acceleration of the digital media, adversely declining letter volumes.
Continuous financial turmoil due to the 2008 pension deficit has caused a negative impact on
Royal Mails profit/loss, balance sheet and cash flow (Hooper, 2010).
Royal Mail has continued to lose its market shares with its competitors.
Royal Mails financial stability has been observed to have turbulence
Stating the above factors, the presentation later reported the stakeholders map in order to give
a brief outlook on Royal Mails stakeholders. The presentation reported ten main stakeholders
for Royal Mail to keep up with their expectations. The diagram below is exact extraction from the
presentation:
The stakeholders map presented was to generalize the stakeholder expectations that Royal
Mail have to keep up with. The cluster of major stakeholders represent the corporate network
ROYAL MAIL
olleague
Unions
Sub
Customer
s and
suppliers
OFCOM
International Post
Cor oration
Post Europe
Universal Postal
UK
-
8/12/2019 Change Management on Royal Mail
16/16
15
that Royal Mail is obliged to please. Following to this, the presentation deployed Kurt Lewins
Force field analysis to derive the driving and resisting forces to change in Royal Mail.
Kurt Lewins force field analysis deployed in the presentation described that the driving forces
were exceeding the resisting force, urging the company to adapt change. In light to the observed
quo of Royal Mail, the presentation later discussed recommendations in reference to the
contents discussed above. Following were the recommendations:
As resisting as it can seem, introducing a private sector capital into Royal mail is a
sustainable decision.
Inject private sector discipline.
Develop a more customer oriented commercial strategy/ diversification for the digital age.
Urge government to remove pension deficit as part of a wider package of measures.
Transferring regulatory frameworks to a private regulatory body to ensure sustainability
and efficient universal postal service.
Royal
Mail
Overall financial health of Royal Mail
Failure to meet modernidsation policies
Decline in letter volumes.
Recession.
Lack of expertise in technological
Common resistance to privatization
Resistance from Common Workers Union
(CWU).