change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the safety perspectiveal

21
Automation in Aviation: the safety perspective ALIAS Conference 14-15 June, Florence Presenter: Micaela Veríssimo Manager Technical Section Legal Department Co-author: Michel Masson Safety Action Coordinator

Upload: aliasnetwork

Post on 22-May-2015

514 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

If you are interested in the topic please register to the ALIAS network: http://network.aliasnetwork.eu/ to download other materials and get information about the ALIAS project (www.aliasnetwork.eu).

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

Automation in Aviation: the safety perspective

ALIAS Conference

14-15 June, Florence

Presenter: Micaela Veríssimo

Manager Technical Section Legal Department

Co-author: Michel Masson

Safety Action Coordinator

Page 2: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

About EASA

• Operational since 2003

• Based on experience from

the JAA

• Located in Cologne, Germany

• Staff of more than 700

• Headed by Mr Patrick Goudou

Page 3: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

Geo-scope of the EASA system

27 EU states

4 EFTA states

Page 4: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

Material scope of the EASA system

Page 5: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA’s Core Activities

Product & Organisation Certification

Rulemaking

Standardisation

European Aviation Safety Programme

International Cooperation

Page 6: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

Regulatory philosophy

Economic regulation

Performance regulation

ATM

/AN

S

Aer

odro

mes

3rd

Cou

ntry

Ope

ratio

ns

Ope

ratio

ns &

FCL

Air

wor

thin

ess

Interoperability regulation

Safety regulation TOTAL SYSTEM APPROACH

Page 7: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

Regulatory Structure

EU Treaty

Har

d L

A W

Soft

LAWEASA

MS

Parliament

Council

Commission

EASA Basic Regulation216/2008

Implementing Regulations

• Guidance material

(GM)

• Alternative Means of

Compliance (AMC)

• Certification Specificatio

n (CS)

Page 8: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

Regulation Structure

Page 9: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

ATM Regulation structure

• Technical requirements• Requirements for organisations

• Requirements for competent authorities

•ATM•Regulation

s

Page 10: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA Automation Policy

• Modern aircraft are increasingly reliant on

automation

• Even more important in tomorrow’s aviation system

• SESAR and NextGEN programmes

• ATM/ANS & Aircraft

Automation has many

advantages…but also

challenges

Page 11: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

Quote

31 Aug 2011

?

Page 12: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA Automation Policy

EASA has been working on an automation policy since 2010

Actions for EASA in the EASp 2012-2015www.easa.europa.eu/sms/

Cooperating on a European and International level, with other regulators and industry

Page 13: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA Automation Policy

Mapping:Human-automation interaction issues design, certification & training principlesRegulatory provisions

to identify issues and paths for improvement

Page 14: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA Automation Policy

Design

Procedures

SystemPerformance

CompetencesExperienceEducationTraining

The Performance TriangleM. Masson (EASA), 2011

In this model, all elements contribute to the Man-Machine System (MMS) performanceAnd the cause of a MMS performance breakdown cannot be reduced to a single component

Basic Principle

Page 15: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA Automation Policy

The EU aviation system is globally well defended, provided all regulatory provisions and best practices are well and uniformly implemented

Regulatory development already under way in OPS, FCL, ATM/ANS domains will provide additional mitigations

But some issues still deserve attention…

Page 16: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA Automation Policy

Decline of basic manual and cognitive skillsLoss of situational awareness of automation mode or statusDistractionDifficulty in transition to degraded modesReaction to unexpected automation behaviour

Main issuesIncorrect interaction with automation

Overreliance on automation

Page 17: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA Automation Policy

Automation should be used at the most appropriate levelSystems designed to be error tolerantAutomation must not reduce overall system reliability and enhance system’s safety, efficiency and economy

High level principles addressing:

Design & CertificationTrainingOperations

Page 18: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA Automation Policy

Enhance basic manual and cognitive skillsReinforce link with automation in training and testingOrganisations’ automation policyReview standards to re-assess assumptions made in relation to human capabilities to take appropriate action.

Improvements could follow different paths

Page 19: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

Improvements may be achieved through

different means

Regulatory

Safety promotion

Page 20: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

EASA automation policy

A survey was published on 24 April 2012 and will be on-line until 30 June:

http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ipm/forms/dispatch?form=easaCAS2012&lang=en

Work will continue with a view to achieving the highest level of safety

Regulatory material and standards

Best practices

Page 21: Change responbililities - liabilities due to automation: the Safety Perspectiveal

For further information, please contact:

Micaela Verí[email protected]

Dr. Michel [email protected]