changes of nk cells in preeclampsia
TRANSCRIPT
Changes of NK Cells in PreeclampsiaAtsushi Fukui, Megumi Yokota, Ayano Funamizu, Rika Nakamua, Rie Fukuhara, Kenichi Yamada,Hidetaka Kimura, Asami Fukuyama, Mai Kamoi, Kanji Tanaka, Hideki Mizunuma
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
Keywords
Angiogenesis, cytokine, natural cytotoxicity
receptor, NK cell, NKp46, preeclampsia
Correspondence
Atsushi Fukui, Department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, Hirosaki University Graduate
School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki,
Aomori 036-8562, Japan.
E-mail: [email protected]
Submission December 30, 2011;
accepted February 5, 2012.
Citation
Fukui A, Yokota M, Funamizu A, Nakamua R,
Fukuhara R, Yamada K, Kimura H, Fukuyama
A, Kamoi M, Tanaka K, Mizunuma H. Changes
of NK cells in preeclampsia. Am J Reprod
Immunol 2012; 67: 278–286
doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01120.x
The regulation of uterine and circulating peripheral blood natural killer
(NK) cells has been associated with reproductive immunology such as
recurrent pregnancy losses, implantation failures, or preeclampsia. Pre-
eclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy characterized by
increased blood pressure accompanied by proteinuria and is a major
cause of maternal and fetal mortality. Natural cytotoxicity receptors
(NCRs) are unique markers, which regulate NK cell cytotoxicity and
cytokine production. The relation of NCRs to reproduction is not fully
characterized yet. The different profile of NCRs expression may suggest
presence of abnormal regulation of NK cell in women with reproductive
failures. Pregnant women with preeclampsia carry immunological
abnormalities of NCRs on peripheral blood NK cells during pregnancy.
The lower expression of NKp46+ NK cells in women with preeclampsia
may account for the higher production of NK1 cytokine that is known
as NK1 shift in pregnant women with preeclampsia. Evaluation of
NKp46 on peripheral blood NK cells may be applicable to find the onset
of preeclampsia. In this review, various expressions of NK cell surface
markers including NCRs on NK cells, NK cell cytotoxicity, and produc-
tion of cytokines and angiogenic factors by NK cells were reviewed in
relation to preeclampsia.
Introduction
Natural killer (NK) cells play an important role in
human pregnancy and systemic regulation of NK
cells contribute to reproductive success. Generally,
NK cells can attack the target cells without sensitiza-
tion. The roles of NK cells are known as elimination
of cancer cells or foreign substances and secretion of
a variety of cytokines. NK cells compose 5–10%of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), and 70–90%of uterine lymphocytes are distinguished from other
cell types by the expression of NK-specific surface
markers, that is, CD56 positive cells. Human NK cell
subsets exist as either as CD56bright or CD56dim NK
cells. In addition, CD56bright cells are mainly in the
decidua. In peripheral blood, the main population of
NK cell is CD56dim cell. The regulation of uterine
and circulating peripheral blood NK cell may have
an association with reproductive immunology such
as recurrent pregnancy losses (RPL), implantation
failures, or preeclampsia.
Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of preg-
nancy characterized by increased blood pressure
accompanied by proteinuria, both occurring after
20 weeks of gestation. Preeclampsia is identified in
3.9% of all pregnancies. In developed countries, 16%
of maternal deaths were because of hypertensive dis-
orders. On the other hand, those as a result of hemor-
rhage are 13%, abortion are 8%, and sepsis are 2%.1
So, preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of mater-
nal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Preeclamp-
sia has pre-clinical (symptomless) and clinical
(symptomatic) stages. Until recently, only symptom-
atic final stage could be detected by clinical screening.
Two-stage disorder theory is well accepted for pre-
eclampsia. Stage 1 is poor placentation at early stage
of pregnancy, and stage 2 is placental oxidative stress
at late stage of pregnancy. Stage 1 is pre-clinical and
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 67 (2012) 278-286
278 ª 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
REVIEW ARTICLE
characterized by faulty trophoblastic vascular remod-
eling of uterine arteries that causes failure to remodel
spiral arteries supplying uteroplacental circulation
and placental hypoxia. NK cell is known to produce
angiogenic cytokines and proteins and failure to
remodel spiral arteries downstream causes the stage 2
clinical syndrome. Then, stage 2 fetal growth restric-
tion and preeclampsia develop2 (Fig. 1). Moreover,
circulating T and NK cells are known to be activated
in preeclampsia.3 Besides, it is considered that uterine
NK cells could contribute to the development of pre-
eclampsia by inducing the lysis of trophoblast cells
lacking HLA-G.4 And loss of trophoblast cells that
should invade the developing spiral arteries would
result in the lack of a sufficient supply of oxygen and
nutrients to the developing placenta.5,6 Interestingly,
it is reported that at least one of etiologies for sponta-
neous abortion or infertility may in fact be essentially
the same as the one leads to preeclampsia in those
pregnancies that survive 20 weeks.4 Therefore, NK
cell seems to be important for the development of pre-
eclampsia. In this review, various surface markers
including natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs) on NK
cells and intracellular cytokines and angiogenic fac-
tors were reviewed in relation to preeclampsia.
Angiogenesis of NK cells and preeclampsia
Transforming growth factor (TGF)-b has an impor-
tant role in angiogenesis.7 Endometraial or decidual
CD16�/CD56bright NK cells produce not only TGF-bbut also other angiogenic factors such as angiopoie-
tin (Ang) 1, Ang 2, vascular endothelial growth fac-
tor (VEGF), and placental growth factor (PlGF).8,9
These results indicate that NK cell in uterus has an
important role in angiogenesis. That is, angiogenic
factors such as VEGF and PlGF and cytokines such
as IL-8 and IFN-inducible protein 10 induce and
support the invasion of the extravillous trophoblasts
into the maternal spiral arteries to achieve the
remodeling of the spiral arteries required for ade-
quate placental perfusion later in normal preg-
nancy.4 Recently, abnormal productions of some
angiogenic factors by peripheral blood NK cells were
reported. Molvarec et al.10 reported that the percent-
age of VEGF-producing peripheral blood NK cells
were significantly lower in women with preeclamp-
sia compared with healthy pregnant women. VEGF
(VEGF-A) is an effective angiogenic protein with
essential roles in angiogenesis. VEGF acts via binding
to VEGF receptors such as VEGF receptors 1 [soluble
fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1)]. And excess sFlt1
in preeclamptic serum impaired angiogenesis that is
restored by exogenous VEGF and PlGF.11 T cells and
NK cells can produce VEGF. Experimental data
showed that placental hypoxia because of abnormal
angiogenesis is the result of higher sFlt1.12,13 There
are five types of VEGF (VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C,
VEGF-D, and VEGF-E) and two types of PlGF in
VEGF family. VEGF-C is shown to peak during the
Clinical
Stage 1Poor placentation
(early, 8~18weeks of pregnancy)
Stage 2Placental oxidative stress
(late)
Fetal-growth restrictionSystemic release of placental
factors
Systemic inflammatory response, endothelial activation
PREECLAMPSIASyndrome
Angiogenic cytokines
PreclinicalFailure to remodel spiralarteries supplying utero-placental circulation and
placental hypoxia
NKcell
Fig. 1 Two-stage disorder of preeclampsia. Stage 1 is poor placentation at early stage of pregnancy and stage 2 is placental oxidative stress at
late stage of pregnancy. Stage 1 is pre-clinical and characterized by faulty trophoblastic vascular remodeling of uterine arteries that causes failure
to remodel spiral arteries supplying uteroplacental circulation and placental hypoxia. Natural killer cell is known to produce angiogenic cytokines
and proteins and failure to remodel spiral arteries downstream causes the stage 2 clinical syndrome. Then, stage 2 fetal growth restriction and
preeclampsia develop.2
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 67 (2012) 278-286
ª 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S 279
CHANGES OF NK CELLS IN PREECLAMPSIA
early and midsecretory phase of the menstrual
cycle.14 Kalkunte et al.15 reported that a proangio-
genic factor, VEGF-C-producing uterine NK cell is a
non-cytotoxic phenotype. VEGF-C production is
hallmark property of non-cytotoxic uterine NK cells.
They also showed that VEGF-C could protect target
endothelial and trophoblast cells from killing by
cytotoxic peripheral blood NK cells.15 Dysregulation
of VEGF-C production by NK cell at feto-maternal
interface causes poor angiogenesis and pregnancy
complications. In fact, lower expression of VEGF-C is
reported in women with preeclampsia or intrauter-
ine growth restriction.16 Molvarec et al.17 also
reported that the percentage of galectin-1 expressing
NK cells in women with preeclampsia was signifi-
cantly decreased compared with that in normal preg-
nant women. The expressions of galection-1 of
circulating T cells and NK cells are significantly
higher in healthy pregnant women than in non-
pregnant women. Activated T cells, B cells, NK cells,
and macrophages express galectin-1. So, the decrease
in galectin-1 in women with preeclampsia may have
a relation to the development of the pro-inflamma-
tory Th1 or Th17 immune responses characteristics
of the maternal syndrome of disease.
Type 1 shift of NK cells in preeclampsia
Pregnancy has been reported to be associated with a
shift away from Th1 type and bias toward Th2 type
immune responses.18–20 The Th1/Th2 concept has
been extended by demonstrating that NK cells can
also show comparable polarities in their cytokine
secretion profiles.21,22 It is reported that predomi-
nant Th1-type immunity is present in preeclampsia
and this is similar to non-pregnant women.23,24 A
later study demonstrated that the production of Th1-
type cytokine, IFN-c, is also enhanced in NK
cells.25,26 Namely, type 1 shift of NK cells has been
reported in Preeclampsia.27 Interestingly, Borzy-
chowski et al. reported that there were no changes
in the Th1/Th2 or Tc1/Tc2 cell ratios in preeclamptic
women. However, the NK1/NK2 cell ratios were sig-
nificantly decreased in normal pregnancy compared
with non-pregnant and preeclamptic women.27
Although many studies used stimulated peripheral
blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) before evaluating
type1/type2 ratio and the majority of these studies
only investigated helper T cells and not NK cells,
they used pan type 1 (IL-18) and pan type 2 (ST2L)
lymphocyte function markers in flow cytometry
without stimulation of PBMC to characterize PBL
populations. Therefore, their data may show the true
cytokines ratio in vivo. At least higher NK1/NK2 ratio
may exist in women with preeclampsia. Further-
more, it was reported that increased IFN-c level in
peripheral blood in women with preeclampsia com-
pared with normal pregnancy in NK cells. However,
there was no significant difference in helper T cells
and cytotoxic T cells.28 Their results similarly show
that the shift away from type 2 to type 1 in pre-
eclamptic women was predominantly in NK cells
and not T cells. Moreover, Sargent et al.29 reported
that aberrant NK cell activation both locally in the
decidua and systemically in the maternal blood
might be the cause of preeclampsia.
Natural cytotoxicity receptors
For the NK cell surface markers, NCRs are unique
markers, which regulate NK cell cytotoxicity and
cytokine production. NCRs, which include NKp30,
NKp44 and NKp46, are expressed exclusively on NK
cells. The NKp46 receptor is a 46-kDa type I mem-
brane glycoprotein characterized by two C2-type
Ig-like domains in the extracellular portion and is
associated with CD3ζ and FceRIc that become
tyrosine phosphorylated. The NKp44 receptor is a
44-kDa type I membrane glycoprotein characterized
by a single V-type Ig-like domain in the extracellular
portion and is associated with KARAP/CAP12 mole-
cules. The NKp30 receptor is a 30-kDa type I mem-
brane glycoprotein characterized by a single V-type
Ig-like domain in the extracellular portion and asso-
ciated with CD3ζ polypeptides.30 NKp46 and NKp30
are constitutively expressed on NK cells, but NKp44
expression is induced after NK cell activation. We
previously reported that the three fourth of periph-
eral blood NK cells are NKp46+ NK cells and the half
of peripheral blood NK cells are NKp30+ NK cells.31
NCRs are the major receptors involved in NK cyto-
toxicity and have a function of the recognition and
lysis of tumor cells by NK cells. Signal cascade of
NCRs is as follows. First, cellular ligands, for which
recognition by NCRs are not fully elucidated, bind to
each NCR. Then, protein tyrosine kinases are acti-
vated. Protein tyrosine kinases phophorylate immu-
noreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs. Then,
protein tyrosine kinases of zeta-chain associated pro-
tein of 70 kDa (Zap-70) or SYK are recruited and
activated. Then, SLP76, p85-PI3K, LAT, PLC-g1,
PLC-g2, and so on are phosphorylated and activated.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 67 (2012) 278-286
280 ª 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
FUKUI ET AL.
Finally, the intracellular release of calcium induces
NK cell cytotoxicity and cytokines’ release.30
NKp46 and NKp44, but not NKp30, recognize
viral proteins such as the hemagglutinin of influ-
enza, or the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase of parain-
fluenza virus.32,33 The endogenous cellular ligands
recognized by NCRs are not known. Recently, NCR
ligands were found to be expressed by murine lym-
phoma and myeloma cell lines34 and in human pri-
mary nevi and melanomas.35,36 The NKp30 and
NKp46 receptors are expressed on the surface of
activated and non-activated NK cells. However, the
NKp44 receptor is expressed on the surface of acti-
vated NK cells only. In addition, the NKp30 and
NKp46 receptors have a function in cytotoxic activ-
ity and cytokine production of NK cells.
In uterus, it is reported that endometrial NK cells
have a unique receptor repertoire, or specifically,
they are positive for NKp46, and negative or positive
at low levels for NKp30 and NKp44, respectively, for
both proliferative and secretory phase endome-
trium.37 However, our data showed that endometrial
NK cells are positive for not only NKp46 but also
NKp30 and NKp44 in secretory phase endome-
trium.38 Zhang et al.39 reported higher expression of
NKp44 and NKp46, and we reported higher expres-
sion of NKp44 and NKp3038 on decidual NK cells in
women’s spontaneous abortion. NCR+ cells have
higher cytotoxicity and there may be a higher cyto-
toxicity in reproductive failures. On the other hand,
in peripheral blood, we reported lower expression of
NKp46 on circulating peripheral blood NK cells in
women with RPL and implantation failures,31 and
abnormal correlation between NCRs expression on
peripheral blood NK cells and cytokines production
by peripheral blood NK cells in women with RPL
and implantation failures.40 However, these patients
with abnormal expressions of NCRs, especially
NKp46 or NKp44, do not always fall into spontane-
ous abortion. Further study is needed to clarify the
participation of NCRs of endometrial and peripheral
blood NK cells in reproduction.
HLA-C and killer immunoglobulin-like receptor in
preeclampsia
Decidual NK cells can recognize HLA-C expressed by
extravillous trophoblast (paternal HLA-C). These NK
cells express killer immunoglobulin-like receptors
(KIR), and dominant ligand of KIR is HLA-C. There
are two types of KIR, one is an inhibitory receptor
and the other is an activating receptor. There are
hundreds of HLA-C variants. HLA-C can divide into
two functional groups by the presence of asparagine
and lysine at position 80 in the protein sequence.41
The former is HLA-C1 and the latter is HLA-C2.
HLA-C2 is recognized by inhibitory KIR2DL1
(CD158a) and activating KIR2DS1 (CD158h), and
C1 is recognized by inhibitory KIR2DL2 (CD158b1)
and KIR2DL3 (CD158b2). C1 is not recognized by
KIR-activating receptor. And HLA-C2 interacts more
strongly than HLA-C1.42 KIR can divide into two
functional groups KIR A and KIR B by the presence
and absence of particular subsets of KIR genes. Uter-
ine NK cell can produce angiogenic factors and cyto-
kines that induce trophoblast invasion. This is
enhanced by ligation of stimulatory KIR B and
reduced by KIR A.43 Maternal KIR genotypes could
be AA (no activating receptor) or AB/BB (one or
more activating receptor).44 So, fetal HLA-C2 with
maternal KIR B/B is the adequate placentation and
avoiding preeclampsia. On the other hand, fetal
HLA-C2 with maternal KIR A/A is the high risk of
preeclampsia.45
NCRs and preeclampsia
We have investigated the expression of NCRs on
peripheral blood NK cells in women with pre-
eclampsia. Pregnant women with preeclampsia
showed a significantly decreased percentage in
CD56+/NKp46+ cells and CD56bright/NKp46+ cells
compared with that in pregnant women without
preeclampsia.46,47 Interestingly, lower expression of
CD56+/NKp46+ cells in pregnant women with pre-
eclampsia was observed 3–4 months before the
onset of preeclampsia and it continued until deliv-
ery. Moreover, from the vantage of the gestational
week, lower expression of CD56+/NKp46+ cells in
pregnant women with preeclampsia was observed
at 20 weeks of gestation and it continued until
delivery. Onset of preeclampsia in our study was at
34 ± 6 weeks of gestation. Until recently, only
symptomatic final stage of preeclampsia could be
detected by clinical screening. However, there are
two stages of preeclampsia, that is to say pre-clini-
cal and clinical stage. Many researchers have tried
to predict preeclampsia before onset pre-clinical
stage. If we are able to know the development of
preeclampsia before onset of preeclampsia in pre-
clinical stage, NKp46 may have a potential to
become a useful marker for prediction of pre-
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 67 (2012) 278-286
ª 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S 281
CHANGES OF NK CELLS IN PREECLAMPSIA
eclampsia like other factors such as sFlt1 and
PlGF.48,49 Besides, pregnant women with pre-
eclampsia showed a significantly higher percentage
in CD56+/NK44+ cells, CD56dim/NKp44+ cells and
CD56bright/NKp44+ cells compared with that in
pregnant women without preeclampsia. Moreover,
higher expression of CD56+/NKp44+ cells in preg-
nant women with preeclampsia was observed at 12
and 20 weeks of pregnancy. So, this means that
women with preeclampsia have a higher NK cell
cytotoxicity before onset of preeclampsia at stage 1
asymptomatic stage of preeclampsia. This may be
one of the reasons of abnormal placentation in pre-
eclampsia.
For NK cell cytokines production, NKp46+ NK cells
in pregnant women were negatively correlated with
tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a+-producingCD56bright NK cells. However, there were no correla-
tions between the expression of NCRs and type 2
cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10) production by NK cells.
The expression of NKp46+ NK cells in pregnant
women with preeclampsia was lower than that in
normal pregnant controls. So, the lower expression
of NKp46+ NK cells in women with preeclampsia
may account for the higher production of NK1
(TNF-a) cytokine that is known as NK1 shift in preg-
nant women with preeclampsia (Fig. 2). These data
were presented at first clinical reproductive immu-
nology symposium that has been held at Providence,
RI, USA in 2011.
NK cell cytotoxicity and preeclampsia
There are various kinds of activating and inhibitory
receptors on the surface of NK cells (Table I). NK cell
cytotoxicity is decided by the balance of its activating
and inhibitory receptors. Not only NCRs but also
inhibitory NKG2A and activating NKG2C and NKG2D
are included as these receptors. Recently, some evi-
dences of the expressions of NCRs and NKG2D and
NK cell cytotoxicity were provided. Forte et al.50
reported that NKp44 and NKG2D function as trigger-
ing receptors involved in direct human NK cytotoxic-
ity against porcine endothelial cells, whereas NKp30
and NKp46 do not play a role. They concluded that
inhibition of interaction between NKp44 and NKG2D
on human NK cells might prevent direct NK
responses. Decreased expression of NKp46 and
NKG2D in patients with post-transplantation lympho-
proliferative disorders was also reported.51 This result
indicated that these patients have potential regulatory
mechanisms responsible for the NK cell functional
abnormalities. So, these receptors are associated with
NK cell cytotoxicity. Why then, it is reported that
stimulating the activating receptors on decidual NK
cells in a redirected activation assay increased produc-
tion of growth factors and angiogenic factors such as
VEGF and PlGF.9 On the other hand, Bachmayer
et al.52 reported that the levels of inhibitory NKG2A
and activating NKG2C on peripheral blood NK cell in
women with preeclampsia was significantly higher
than that in healthy pregnant women or healthy
donor. They concluded that the peripheral NK cell
pool is altered in women with preeclampsia with
enhanced NKG2A and NKG2C levels on NK cells.
Thus, the function and the expression of surface
markers on decidual (uterine) NK cell and peripheral
blood NK cell are different. How about NCRs? There
are some reports about the correlation between endo-
metrial/decidual NK cell and peripheral blood NK cell.
It is reported that peripheral blood NK cell levels
reflect changes in decidual NK cell levels.53 We can
easily have access to the peripheral blood, so it is often
used for diagnostic purpose to detect reproductive fail-
ures.54,55 We have previously reported that the per-
centages of CD16+/CD56dim NK cells in peripheral
blood and endometrium in IVF-ET cycle were signifi-
cantly higher and that of CD16�/CD56btight NK cells
was markedly lower in reproductive failures com-
pared with successful group.56 Others reported that
examination of peripheral blood NK cells would not
Fig. 2 Mechanism of NK1 shift in preeclampsia. NKp46+ NK cells were
significantly lower in women with preeclampsia compared with normal
pregnant women, and NKp46+ NK cells were negatively correlated
with type 1 cytokine-producing NK cells significantly. The lower
expression of NKp46+ NK cells in women with preeclampsia may
account for the higher production of NK1 cytokine that is known as
NK1 shift in pregnant women with preeclampsia. NK, natural killer.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 67 (2012) 278-286
282 ª 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
FUKUI ET AL.
Table I NK Cell Receptors
NK cell inhibitory receptors NK cell activating receptors
Receptors Ligands Receptors Ligands
MHC class I specific MHC class I specific
KIR KIR
KIR2DL1 (CD158a) HLA-C KIR2DS1, KIR2DS2 HLA-C
KIR2DL2/3 HLA-C KIR2DL4 HLA-G
KIR2DL5 Unknown KIR2DS4, KIR2DS5, KIR3DS1 Unknown
KIR3DL1 HLA-Bw4 C-type lectin receptors
KIR3DL2 HLA-A3, -A11 CD94/NKG2C HLA-E
KIR3DL7 Unknown CD94/NKG2E/H Unknown
C-type lectin receptors Non MHC class I specific
CD94/NKG2A HLA-E Natural cytotoxicity receptors
CD161 Unknown NKp46 Unknown
Immunoglobulin like transcripts NKp44 Unknown
ILT-2 Unknown NKp30 Unknown
Others C-type lectin receptors
P75/AIRM Unknown NKG2D MICA, MICB, ULBP-1, 2, 3
IRp60 Unknown Others
LAIR-1 Ep-CAM CD16, CD2, LFA1, 2B4, NKp80, CD69, CD40 ligand
KIR, killer immunoglobulin-like receptors; MFC, major histocompatibility complex; NK, natural killer.
a2V-ATPase
Activating Receptor Inhibitory ReceptorNKG2CNKG2D NKG2A
KIRNCR
Type 1 (NK1) cytokines Type 2 (NK2) cytokines
Cytokines production
Cytotoxicity (+) Cytotoxicity (–)
NCR(NKp46)
Dual functions
Achievement and
maintenance of pregnancy
REPRODUCTIVE FAILURES
such asPreeclampsia
Amphibiousness of Natural Cytotoxicity Receptor (NCR)
KIR
NKp44, NKp46)NCR (NKp30,
NK cell
Fig. 3 Participation of natural killer (NK) cells in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. NK cells express various kinds of their surface markers and
can produce various kinds of cytokines and angiogenic factors. Natural cytotoxicity receptors, especially NKp46, has dual functions. One is
cytotoxicity and the other is cytokines production. NK cell cytotoxicity is decided by the balance of the expression of its activating and inhibitory
receptor. NK1/NK2 balance is decided by its production of cytokines. Abnormal balance of the expression of NK cell surface activating and
inhibitory receptors and abnormal balance of NK1 and NK2 cytokines production lead to reproductive failure such as preeclampsia.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 67 (2012) 278-286
ª 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S 283
CHANGES OF NK CELLS IN PREECLAMPSIA
tell us what is happening in the uterus.57,58 It is evi-
dent that uterine NK cells are important for achieve-
ment and maintenance of pregnancy. However, it is
controversial for the function and usefulness of
peripheral blood NK cells. Often the interaction
between peripheral blood NK cells and trophoblast
are not well understood, and researchers are investi-
gating this with various roles of peripheral and decid-
ual NK cells.58,59 NK cells preferentially kill targets
with lower expression of major histocompatibility
complex class I proteins, because fewer inhibitory
receptors are engaging ligands. As a consequence,
syncytiotrophoblasts are not free from peripheral
blood NK cell cytotoxicity. We measured the correla-
tion between NCRs+ NK cells of peripheral blood and
midsecretory endometrium. There were significant
positive correlations between the percentage of
CD56+/NKp46+ and the CD56bright/NKp46+ NK cells
in peripheral blood and midsecretory endome-
trium.46,47 There was also significant positive correla-
tion between the percentage of CD56dim/NKp44+ NK
cells in peripheral blood and midsecretory endome-
trium. So for the expression of NKp46 and NKp44 on
NK cells, it may be possible to gain an understanding
of the uterine NKp46+ NK cells by evaluating periph-
eral blood NKp46+ and NKp44+ NK cells.
Conclusion
Appropriate expression of NK cells is important for
the successful achievement and maintenance preg-
nancy. There are abnormal expressions of NK cell
surface antigens and dysregulation of NK cell cyto-
toxicity and cytokines or angiogenic factors produc-
tion in women with reproductive failures such as
preeclampsia. The expression of NCRs, especially
NKp46 and NKp44 on NK cell, may be one of the
useful marker for prediction of preeclampsia (Fig. 3).
References
1 Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF: WHO
analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet
2006; 367:1066–1074.
2 Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, Hauth J, Rouse D, Spong C:
Williams Obstetrics, 23rd edn. New York, Mc Graw Hill Medical,
2010.
3 Saito S, Shiozaki A, Nakashima A, Sakai M, Sasaki Y: The role of
the immune system in preeclampsia. Mol Aspects Med 2007; 28:192–
209.
4 Ahn H, Park J, Gilman-Sachs A, Kwak-Kim J: Immunologic
characteristics of preeclampsia, a comprehensive review. Am J
Reprod Immunol 2011; 65:377–394.
5 Goldman-Wohl DS, Ariel I, Greenfield C, Hochner-Celnikier D,
Cross J, Fisher S, Yagel S: Lack of human leukocyte antigen-G
expression in extravillous trophoblasts is associated with pre-
eclampsia. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6:88–95.
6 Hara N, Fujii T, Yamashita T, Kozuma S, Okai T, Taketani Y:
Altered expression of human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) on
extravillous trophoblasts in preeclampsia: immunohistological
demonstration with anti-HLA-G specific antibody “87G” and anti-
cytokeratin antibody “CAM5.2”. Am J Reprod Immunol 1996; 36:349
–358.
7 Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, Yu KF, Maynard SE, Sachs BP, Sibai
BM, Epstein FH, Romero R, Thadhani R, Karumanchi SA: Soluble
endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in
preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:992–1005.
8 Moffett-King A: Natural killer cells and pregnancy. Nat Rev Immunol
2002; 2:656–663.
9 Hanna J, Goldman-Wohl D, Hamani Y, Avraham I, Greenfield C,
Natanson-Yaron S, Prus D, Cohen-Daniel L, Arnon TI, Manaster I,
Gazit R, Yutkin V, Benharroch D, Porgador A, Keshet E, Yagel S,
Mandelboim O: Decidual NK cells regulate key developmental
processes at the human fetal-maternal interface. Nat Med 2006;
12:1065–1074.
10 Molvarec A, Ito M, Shima T, Yoneda S, Toldi G, Stenczer B,
Vasarhelyi B, Rigo J Jr, Saito S: Decreased proportion of peripheral
blood vascular endothelial growth factor-expressing T and natural
killer cells in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:567 e561–
568.
11 Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, Lim KH, Li J, Mondal S,
Libermann TA, Morgan JP, Sellke FW, Stillman IE, Epstein FH,
Sukhatme VP, Karumanchi SA: Excess placental soluble fms-like
tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction,
hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 2003;
111:649–658.
12 Nagamatsu T, Fujii T, KusumiM, Zou L, Yamashita T, Osuga Y,
MomoedaM, Kozuma S, Taketani Y: Cytotrophoblasts up-regulate
soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 expression under reduced oxygen:
an implication for the placental vascular development and the
pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Endocrinology 2004; 145:4838–4845.
13 Nevo O, Soleymanlou N, Wu Y, Xu J, Kingdom J, Many A,
Zamudio S, Caniggia I: Increased expression of sFlt-1 in in vivo and
in vitro models of human placental hypoxia is mediated by HIF-1.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006; 291:R1085–R1093.
14 Kalkunte S, Chichester CO, Gotsch F, Sentman CL, Romero R,
Sharma S: Evolution of non-cytotoxic uterine natural killer cells.
Am J Reprod Immunol 2008; 59:425–432.
15 Kalkunte SS, Mselle TF, Norris WE, Wira CR, Sentman CL, Sharma
S: Vascular endothelial growth factor C facilitates immune tolerance
and endovascular activity of human uterine NK cells at the
maternal-fetal interface. J Immunol 2009; 182:4085–4092.
16 Dunk C, Ahmed A: Expression of VEGF-C and activation of its
receptors VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 in trophoblast. Histol Histopathol
2001; 16:359–375.
17 Molvarec A, Blois SM, Stenczer B, Toldi G, Tirado-Gonzalez I, Ito
M, Shima T, Yoneda S, Vasarhelyi B, Rigo J Jr, Saito S: Peripheral
blood galectin-1-expressing T and natural killer cells in normal
pregnancy and preeclampsia. Clin Immunol 2011; 139:48–56.
18 Kwak-Kim JY, Chung-Bang HS, Ng SC, Ntrivalas EI, Mangubat CP,
Beaman KD, Beer AE, Gilman-Sachs A: Increased T helper 1
cytokine responses by circulating T cells are present in women with
recurrent pregnancy losses and in infertile women with multiple
implantation failures after IVF. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:767–773.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 67 (2012) 278-286
284 ª 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
FUKUI ET AL.
19 Kwak-Kim JY, Gilman-Sachs A, Kim CE: T helper 1 and 2 immune
responses in relationship to pregnancy, nonpregnancy, recurrent
spontaneous abortions and infertility of repeated implantation
failures. Chem Immunol Allergy 2005; 88:64–79.
20 Wegmann TG, Lin H, Guilbert L, Mosmann TR: Bidirectional
cytokine interactions in the maternal-fetal relationship: is successful
pregnancy a TH2 phenomenon? Immunol Today 1993; 14:353–356.
21 Carter LL, Dutton RW: Relative perforin- and Fas-mediated lysis in
T1 and T2 CD8 effector populations. J Immunol 1995; 155:1028–
1031.
22 Peritt D, Robertson S, Gri G, Showe L, Aste-Amezaga M, Trinchieri
G: Differentiation of human NK cells into NK1 and NK2 subsets.
J Immunol 1998; 161:5821–5824.
23 Saito S, Sakai M: Th1/Th2 balance in preeclampsia. J Reprod
Immunol 2003; 59:161–173.
24 Rein DT, Schondorf T, Gohring UJ, Kurbacher CM, Pinto I,
Breidenbach M, Mallmann P, Kolhagen H, Engel H: Cytokine
expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes indicates a switch to T
(HELPER) cells in patients with preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol
2002; 54:133–142.
25 Germain SJ, Sacks GP, Sooranna SR, Sargent IL, Redman CW:
Systemic inflammatory priming in normal pregnancy and
preeclampsia: the role of circulating syncytiotrophoblast
microparticles. J Immunol 2007; 178:5949–5956.
26 Saito S, Nakashima A, Shima T, Ito M: Th1/Th2/Th17 and
regulatory T-cell paradigm in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol
2010; 63:601–610.
27 Borzychowski AM, Croy BA, Chan WL, Redman CW, Sargent IL:
Changes in systemic type 1 and type 2 immunity in normal
pregnancy and pre-eclampsia may be mediated by natural killer
cells. Eur J Immunol 2005; 35:3054–3063.
28 Darmochwal-Kolarz D, Rolinski J, Leszczynska-Goarzelak B,
Oleszczuk J: The expressions of intracellular cytokines in the
lymphocytes of preeclamptic patients. Am J Reprod Immunol 2002;
48:381–386.
29 Sargent IL, Borzychowski AM, Redman CW: NK cells and pre-
eclampsia. J Reprod Immunol 2007; 76:40–44.
30 Biassoni R, Cantoni C, Marras D, Giron-Michel J, Falco M, Moretta
L, Dimasi N: Human natural killer cell receptors: insights into their
molecular function and structure. J Cell Mol Med 2003; 7:376–387.
31 Fukui A, Ntrivalas E, Gilman-Sachs A, Kwak-Kim J, Lee SK, Levine
R, Beaman K: Expression of natural cytotoxicity receptors and a2V-
ATPase on peripheral blood NK cell subsets in women with
recurrent spontaneous abortions and implantation failures. Am J
Reprod Immunol 2006; 56:312–320.
32 Arnon TI, Lev M, Katz G, Chernobrov Y, Porgador A, Mandelboim
O: Recognition of viral hemagglutinins by NKp44 but not by
NKp30. Eur J Immunol 2001; 31:2680–2689.
33 Mandelboim O, Lieberman N, Lev M, Paul L, Arnon TI, Bushkin Y,
Davis DM, Strominger JL, Yewdell JW, Porgador A: Recognition of
haemagglutinins on virus-infected cells by NKp46 activates lysis by
human NK cells. Nature 2001; 409:1055–1060.
34 Halfteck GG, Elboim M, Gur C, Achdout H, Ghadially H,
Mandelboim O: Enhanced in vivo growth of lymphoma tumors in
the absence of the NK-activating receptor NKp46/NCR1. J Immunol
2009; 182:2221–2230.
35 Lakshmikanth T, Burke S, Ali TH, Kimpfler S, Ursini F, Ruggeri L,
Capanni M, Umansky V, Paschen A, Sucker A, Pende D, Groh V,
Biassoni R, Hoglund P, Kato M, Shibuya K, Schadendorf D,
Anichini A, Ferrone S, Velardi A, Karre K, Shibuya A, Carbone E,
Colucci F: NCRs and DNAM-1 mediate NK cell recognition and lysis
of human and mouse melanoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo.
J Clin Invest 2009; 119:1251–1263.
36 Cagnano E, Hershkovitz O, Zilka A, Bar-Ilan A, Golder A, Sion-
Vardy N, Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, Mandelboim O, Benharroch D,
Porgador A: Expression of ligands to NKp46 in benign and
malignant melanocytes. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128:972–979.
37 Manaster I, Mizrahi S, Goldman-Wohl D, Sela HY, Stern-Ginossar
N, Lankry D, Gruda R, Hurwitz A, Bdolah Y, Haimov-Kochman R,
Yagel S, Mandelboim O: Endometrial NK cells are special immature
cells that await pregnancy. J Immunol 2008; 181:1869–1876.
38 Fukui A, Funamizu A, Yokota M, Yamada K, Nakamua R,
Fukuhara R, Kimura H, Mizunuma H: Uterine and circulating
natural killer cells and their roles in women with recurrent
pregnancy loss, implantation failure and preeclampsia. J Reprod
Immunol 2011; 90:105–110.
39 Zhang Y, Zhao A, Wang X, Shi G, Jin H, Lin Q: Expressions of
natural cytotoxicity receptors and NKG2D on decidual natural killer
cells in patients having spontaneous abortions. Fertil Steril 2008;
90:1931–1937.
40 Fukui A, Ntrivalas E, Fukuhara R, Fujii S, Mizunuma H, Gilman-
Sachs A, Beaman K, Kwak-Kim J: Correlation between natural
cytotoxicity receptors and intracellular cytokine expression of
peripheral blood NK cells in women with recurrent pregnancy
losses and implantation failures. Am J Reprod Immunol 2009; 62:371
–380.
41 Mandelboim O, Reyburn HT, Vales-Gomez M, Pazmany L, Colonna
M, Borsellino G, Strominger JL: Protection from lysis by natural
killer cells of group 1 and 2 specificity is mediated by residue 80 in
human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen C alleles and also
occurs with empty major histocompatibility complex molecules.
J Exp Med 1996; 184:913–922.
42 Rajagopalan S, Long EO: Understanding how combinations of HLA
and KIR genes influence disease. J Exp Med 2005; 201:1025–1029.
43 Moffett A, Hiby SE: How Does the maternal immune system
contribute to the development of pre-eclampsia? Placenta 2007; 28
(Suppl A):S51–S56.
44 Redman CW, Sargent IL: Immunology of pre-eclampsia. Am J
Reprod Immunol 2010; 63:534–543.
45 Hiby SE, Walker JJ, O’Shaughnessy KM, Redman CW, Carrington
M, Trowsdale J, Moffett A: Combinations of maternal KIR and fetal
HLA-C genes influence the risk of preeclampsia and reproductive
success. J Exp Med 2004; 200:957–965.
46 Fukui A: NK cells and its role in reproduction. Am J Reprod Immunol
2010; 64:1.
47 Fukui A: Uterine and circulating natural killer cells and their roles
in women with recurrent pregnancy losses, implantation failures or
preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol 2010; 86:14.
48 Moore Simas TA, Crawford SL, Solitro MJ, Frost SC, Meyer BA,
Maynard SE: Angiogenic factors for the prediction of
preeclampsia in high-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;
197:244 e241–248.
49 Poon LC, Kametas NA, Maiz N, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH: First-
trimester prediction of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
Hypertension 2009; 53:812–818.
50 Forte P, Lilienfeld BG, Baumann BC, Seebach JD: Human NK
cytotoxicity against porcine cells is triggered by NKp44 and NKG2D.
J Immunol 2005; 175:5463–5470.
51 Wiesmayr S, Webber SA, Macedo C, Popescu I, Smith L, Luce J,
Metes D: Decreased NKp46 and NKG2D and elevated PD-1 are
associated with altered NK-cell function in pediatric transplant
patients with PTLD. Eur J Immunol 2012; 42:541–550.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 67 (2012) 278-286
ª 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S 285
CHANGES OF NK CELLS IN PREECLAMPSIA
52 Bachmayer N, Sohlberg E, Sundstrom Y, Hamad RR, Berg L,
Bremme K, Sverremark-Ekstrom E: Women with pre-eclampsia
have an altered NKG2A and NKG2C receptor expression on
peripheral blood natural killer cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 2009;
62:147–157.
53 Park DW, Lee HJ, Park CW, Hong SR, Kwak-Kim J, Yang KM:
Peripheral blood NK cells reflect changes in decidual NK cells in
women with recurrent miscarriages. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010;
63:173–180.
54 Aoki K, Kajiura S, Matsumoto Y, Ogasawara M, Okada S, Yagami
Y, Gleicher N: Preconceptional natural-killer-cell activity as a
predictor of miscarriage. Lancet 1995; 345:1340–1342.
55 Ntrivalas EI, Kwak-Kim JY, Gilman-Sachs A, Chung-Bang H, Ng
SC, Beaman KD, Mantouvalos HP, Beer AE: Status of peripheral
blood natural killer cells in women with recurrent spontaneous
abortions and infertility of unknown aetiology. Hum Reprod 2001;
16:855–861.
56 Fukui A, Fujii S, Yamaguchi E, Kimura H, Sato S, Saito Y: Natural
killer cell subpopulations and cytotoxicity for infertile patients
undergoing in vitro fertilization. Am J Reprod Immunol 1999; 41:413
–422.
57 Saito S: Cytokine network at the feto-maternal interface. J Reprod
Immunol 2000; 47:87–103.
58 Moffett A, Regan L, Braude P: Natural killer cells, miscarriage, and
infertility. BMJ 2004; 329:1283–1285.
59 Bhalla A, Stone PR, Liddell HS, Zanderigo A, Chamley LW:
Comparison of the expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G
and HLA-E in women with normal pregnancy and those with
recurrent miscarriage. Reproduction 2006; 131:583–589.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 67 (2012) 278-286
286 ª 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
FUKUI ET AL.