changing climate conditions, different response
TRANSCRIPT
© Marco Pluijm, 09/01/2017
Changing Climate Conditions, Different Response… Marco Pluijm Senior Expert Ports and Coasts For quite some time periodic beach and foreshore nourishment have been a rather common response strategy towards coastal erosion and coastline maintenance. Especially in areas where there’s an abundance of suitable sand made available and a marine contracting industry which can handle this at reasonable cost. Although never a sustainable solution of any kind. Simply because it’s a kind of maintenance and doesn’t solve the problem at all.. With climate change induced extreme weather conditions changing more rapid than so far anticipated for, the nourishment approach is becoming even more ineffective. Putting additional pressure on borrow areas and the aquatic environment with each campaign, over and over again. Plus that even so often the so-‐called borrow areas are running out of suitable materials. Actually proving the term “borrow”-‐area wrong, because the bottom sediment is not borrowed. Its actually kind of wasted, because substantial quantities of what has been nourished into the profile, gets transported and lost to areas from where it can’t be reclaimed from again. Usually, depending of the nature and force of the cross-‐ and longshore transport, up to 30 percent or more. Another interesting element is the fact that traditional beach and foreshore nourishment concentrate on the most energy intense, active part of the coastal profile. Hence sediment put there, will be transported much quicker than when for instance placed in the much less active, but equal relevant nearshore areas.
© Marco Pluijm, 09/01/2017
Where usually sand waves, ridges and barriers re found. Contributing to the overall coastline stability and erosion control under the most extreme conditions as they occur for instance during a superstorm and what comes with it. With the number and intensity of superstorms increasing, the importance of a healthy nearshore area become equally relevant. In terms of an improved and more effective coastal protection strategy, making optimal use of available sand resources and minimizing related environmental impacts, tit would be much more effective to enhance these natural features, rather than keep on dumping large quantities of sand in the most dynamic zone, as mentioned earlier. Enhancing the natural features, in accordance of what can be learned from similar features along other coastlines which are being hit frequently, without much damage or no damage at all. Spreading the excessive impact energy and forces over a wider area and using different dissipation phenomena, instead of fighting it off in the breakerzone. A natural coastal systems based holistic approach, in which the Resilient by Nature philosophy and toolkit find their origin. For more information about this subject, please visit https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/adding-‐impact-‐safety-‐natural-‐resilience-‐vulnerable-‐coasts-‐pluijm