chapter 1: introductioncarme.cs.trinity.edu/thicks/3343/lectures/... · atomicity failure...

Dr. Tom HicksComputer Science Department

Transaction Management

Database SystemsCSCI-3343

1

Transaction

2

Transaction

Transaction : a collection of operations that form a single

logical unit of work.

Transactions have two main issues to deal with:

Failures of various kinds, such as hardware failures

and system crashes

Concurrent execution of multiple transactions

3

Atomicity

4

Atomicity Property

Atomicity Property: Either all of the actions of a

transaction be executed properly, or that in the case of

some failure, the partial effects of each incomplete

transaction be undone.

Atomicity requires that each transaction is "all or

nothing": if one part of the transaction fails, the entire

transaction fails, and the database state is left unchanged.

An atomic system must guarantee atomicity in each

and every situation, including power failures, errors, and

crashes. To the outside world, a committed transaction

appears (by its effects on the database) to be indivisible

("atomic"), and an aborted transaction does not happen. 5

Atomicity Failure

Constraint (A + B = 100);

Assume that a transaction attempts to subtract 10 from A

and add 10 to B.

This is a valid transaction, since the data continue to

satisfy the constraint after it has executed.

However, assume that after removing 10 from A, the

transaction is unable to modify B (for whatever reason). If

the database retained A's new value, atomicity and the

constraint would both be violated.

Atomicity requires that both parts of this transaction, or

neither, be complete. 6

MySQL

Later In These Slides:

All transactions must meet the ACID test Atomicity, Consistency,

Isolation, & Durability.

Consistency

8

Consistency Property

Consistency Property: Execution of a transaction in

isolation preserves the consistency of the database.

The Consistency Property ensures that any

transaction will bring the database from one valid

state to another. Any data written to the database

must be valid according to all defined rules, including

but not limited to constraints, cascades, triggers, and

any combination thereof.

Consistency does not guarantee correctness of

the transaction in all ways the application programmer

might have wanted (that is the responsibility of

application-level code) but merely that any

programming errors do not violate any defined rules. 9

Consistency Failure - 1

Constraint (A + B = 100);

Data must meet all validation rules.

If there is a requirement that A + B = 100. Also, it may be

inferred that both A and B must be integers. A valid range

for A and B may also be inferred. All validation rules must

be checked to ensure consistency.

Assume that a transaction attempts to subtract 10 from

A without altering B. Because consistency is checked

after each transaction, it is known that A + B = 100 before

the transaction begins.

10

Consistency Failure - 2

If the transaction removes 10 from A successfully,

atomicity will be achieved. However, a validation check will

show that A + B = 90, which is inconsistent with the rules

of the database.

The entire transaction must be cancelled and the

affected rows rolled back to their pre-transaction state.

If there had been other constraints, triggers, or

cascades, every single change operation would have

been checked in the same way as above before the

transaction was committed.

11

MySQL




Isolation

13

Isolation Property Isolation Property: Since a Transaction is a single unit, it’s

actions cannot appear to be separated by other database actions

“that are not part of this transaction”.

Although multiple transactions may execute concurrently

each transaction must be unaware of other concurrently

executing transactions.

Intermediate transaction results must be hidden from other

concurrently executed transactions.

That is, for every pair of transactions Ti and Tj, it appears to Ti

that either Tj, finished execution before Ti started, or Tj started

execution after Ti finished.

The Database Must Take Special Precautions to make sure

that this transaction operates properly without interference form

concurrently operating database statements! 14

Isolation Property

The Isolation Property ensures that the

concurrent execution of transactions results in a system

state that would be obtained if transactions were

executed serially, i.e. one after the other.

Providing Isolation is the main goal of concurrency

control. Depending on concurrency control method, the

effects of an incomplete transaction might not even be

visible to another transaction

15

MySQL




Durability

17

Durability Property

Durability Property: Once a transaction has

been committed, the changes it has made to the

database persist, even if there are system failures.

In a relational database, for instance, once a group of SQL

statements execute, the results need to be stored

permanently (even if the database crashes immediately

thereafter).

To defend against power loss, Transactions (or their

effects) Must be Recorded in a Non-Volatile Memory.

18

MySQL




Microsoft SQL Server

http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/The-ACID-test-for-T-SQL-batch-statements

Read This!

Example

22

Transaction Concept

A transaction is a unit of program execution that accesses

and possibly updates various data items.

E.g. transaction to transfer $50 from account A to account

B:

1. read(A)

2. A := A – 50

3. write(A)

4. read(B)

5. B := B + 50

6. write(B)

All transactions must meet the ACID test Atomicity,

Consistency, Isolation, & Durability.

23

Example of Fund Transfer

SQL is a Powerful & Complex Language

Begin with a simple transaction that moves data from disk to memory & from memory to

disk.

We are going to ignore Insert & Delete for the moment.

Data Members A & B

read(A) transfers data from database into memory variable A

write(A) transfers data from memory variable A back to disk

Reality information written to disk is often buffered & may not happen immediately

Conceptual Assumption For The Moment we are going to assume that write is

immediate!

Transaction to transfer $50 from account A to account B:

1. read(A)

2. A := A – 50

3. write(A)

4. read(B)

5. B := B + 50

6. write(B)24

Fund Transfer - Atomicity


1. read(A)

2. A := A – 50

3. write(A)

4. read(B)

5. B := B + 50

6. write(B)

Atomicity requirement

if the transaction fails after step 3 and before step 6,

money will be “lost” leading to an inconsistent database

state

Failure could be due to software or hardware

the system should ensure that updates of a partially

executed transaction are not reflected in the database

25

Fund Transfer - Durability


1. read(A)

2. A := A – 50

3. write(A)

4. read(B)

5. B := B + 50

6. write(B)

Durability requirement — once the user has been notified that the transaction

has completed (i.e., the transfer of the $50 has taken place), the updates to

the database by the transaction must persist even if there are software or hardware

failures.

26

Fund Transfer – Isolation

Isolation requirement — if between steps 3 and 6, another transaction T2 is allowed to access the partially updated database, it will see an inconsistent database (the sum A + B will be less than it should be).

T1 T2

1. read(A)

2. A := A – 50

3. write(A)read(A), read(B), print(A+B)

4. read(B)

5. B := B + 50

6. write(B)

Isolation can be ensured trivially by running transactions serially

that is, one after the other.

However, executing multiple transactions concurrently has significant benefits, as we will see later.

The Database Concurrency Control Module takes care of this!

27

Fund Transfer - Consistency Transaction to transfer $50 from account A to account B:

1. read(A)

2. A := A – 50

3. write(A)

4. read(B)

5. B := B + 50

6. write(B)

Consistency requirement in above example:

the sum of A and B is unchanged by the execution of the transaction

In general, consistency requirements include

Explicitly specified integrity constraints such as primary keys and foreign keys

Implicit integrity constraints

– e.g. sum of balances of all accounts, minus sum of loan amounts must equal value of cash-in-hand

A transaction must see a consistent database.

During transaction execution the database may be temporarily inconsistent.

When the transaction completes successfully the database must be consistent

Erroneous transaction logic can lead to inconsistency

28

ACID

29

ACID Properties

Atomicity. Either all operations of the transaction are properly reflected

in the database or none are.

Consistency. Execution of a transaction in isolation preserves the

consistency of the database.

Isolation. Although multiple transactions may execute concurrently,

each transaction must be unaware of other concurrently executing

transactions. Intermediate transaction results must be hidden from other

concurrently executed transactions.

That is, for every pair of transactions Ti and Tj, it appears to Ti that

either Tj, finished execution before Ti started, or Tj started execution

after Ti finished.

Durability. Once a transaction has been committed, the changes it has

made to the database persist, even if there are system failures.

A transaction is a unit of program execution that accesses and possibly

updates various data items.To preserve the integrity of data the database

system must ensure:

30

Storage

Structure

31

Storage Structures

Volatile Storage Info in Volatile Storage does not generally survive a system

crash (RAM, CACHE, etc.) really fast access.

Nonvolatile Storage survives a system crash. (Magnetic Disk, Flash

Storage, Optical Media, Magnetic Tape, etc.) slower access.

Stable Storage to say that information stored in nonvolatile storage is never

lost must be taken with a grain of salt!

Black Hole that swallows up all data

Flash flood, etc

We can take steps to approximate stable storage that reduces the probability of

losing data.

Duplicate the data in several non-volatile storage media (generally disk)

with independent failure modes (RAID, etc.)

Steps must be taken to make sure that this duplicate data remains updated

accordingly. Transactions written to logs!

Hardware fixes include Battery Backup, etc.32

Transaction

State

33

MySQL autocommit

34

To Disable The Autocommit Mode,

SET autocommit = 0;

Changes Application To Transaction-Safe

Tables Where Changes Are Not Made

Permanent Until You Commit.

MSSQL autocommit

35

To Disable The Autocommit Mode,

SET IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS OFF;

Changes Application To Transaction-Safe

Tables Where Changes Are Not Made

Permanent Until You Commit.

COMMIT TRANSACTION;

ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;

Transaction Terminology

Each database modification, made by a transaction is first recorded into a log.

begin transaction;

end transaction;

---------- MySQL ----------

START TRANSACTION;

COMMIT;

Rollback is a process of undoing the aborted transactions. This is part of the recovery

scheme.

Once a transaction is completed correctly, it is said to be Committed.

Once a transaction is committed, it can not be undone, but a Compensating

Transaction could be designed to undo the effects.

36

Transaction State Active – the initial state; the transaction stays in this state while it is executing

Partially committed – after the final statement has been executed.

Failed -- after the discovery that normal execution can no longer proceed.

Aborted – after the transaction has been rolled back and the database restored

to its state prior to the start of the transaction. Two options after it has been

aborted:

restart the transaction

can be done only if no internal logical error

kill the transaction

Committed – after successful completion.

37

Transaction State Flow Diagram

38

Concurrent

Transactions

39

Concurrent Executions

We could force the system to process all transactions serially

one at a time.

We generally allow multiple transactions to be run concurrently in the system.

Advantages are:

Increased Processor and Disk Utilization, leading to better

transaction throughput

E.g. one transaction can be using the CPU while another is reading from

or writing to the disk optimizing multiple processors.

Reduced Average Response Time for transactions: short transactions

need not wait behind long ones.

40

Concurrent Executions

When multiple transactions are processed concurrently, the data isolation

principle may be violated resulting in database consistency being destroyed

despite the correctness of each transaction!

Concurrency control schemes – mechanisms to achieve isolation

that is, to control the interaction among the concurrent transactions in order

to prevent them from destroying the consistency of the database

Will study in Chapter 16, after studying notion of correctness of

concurrent executions.

41

Database Challenges

Multiple Processors with multiple cores are increasing the

opportunities for parallel transaction processing.

Researchers are

Trying to figure out ways to parallel process within a transaction

Trying to process more transaction

42

Schedules

43

Schedules

Schedule – a sequences of instructions that specify the

chronological order in which instructions of concurrent

transactions are executed

a schedule for a set of transactions must consist of all instructions of those

transactions

must preserve the order in which the instructions appear in each individual

transaction.

A transaction that successfully completes its execution will have a commit

instructions as the last statement

by default transaction assumed to execute commit instruction as its last

step

A transaction that fails to successfully complete its execution will have an abort

instruction as the last statement

44

Schedule 1

Let T1 transfer $50 from A to B, and T2 transfer 10% of the balance from A to B.

A serial schedule in which T1 is followed by T2 :

45

Schedule 2

• A serial schedule where T2 is followed by T1

46

Schedule 3 Let T1 and T2 be the transactions defined previously. The following schedule

is not a serial schedule, but it is equivalent to Schedule 1.

In Schedules 1, 2 and 3, the sum A + B is preserved.

When we can ensure consistency of the database under concurrent execution schedule that is equivalent to the serial execution it is Serializable.

47

Schedule 4

The following concurrent schedule does not preserve the

value of (A + B ).

48

Serializability

49

Serializability

Basic Assumption – Each transaction preserves database

consistency.

Thus serial execution of a set of transactions preserves database

consistency.

A (possibly concurrent) schedule is serializable if it is equivalent to a

serial schedule. Different forms of schedule equivalence give rise to

the notions of:

1. conflict serializability

2. view serializability

50

Simplified view of transactions

We ignore operations other than read and write instructions

We assume that transactions may perform arbitrary computations

on data in local buffers in between reads and writes.

Our simplified schedules consist of only read and write

instructions.

51

Conflicting Instructions

Instructions li and lj of transactions Ti and Tj respectively, conflict if and

only if there exists some item Q accessed by both li and lj, and at least

one of these instructions wrote Q.

1. li = read(Q), lj = read(Q). li and lj don’t conflict.

2. li = read(Q), lj = write(Q). They conflict.

3. li = write(Q), lj = read(Q). They conflict

4. li = write(Q), lj = write(Q). They conflict

Intuitively, a conflict between li and lj forces a (logical) temporal order

between them.

If li and lj are consecutive in a schedule and they do not conflict,

their results would remain the same even if they had been

interchanged in the schedule.

52

Conflict Serializability

If a schedule S can be transformed into a schedule S´ by a

series of swaps of non-conflicting instructions, we say that

S and S´ are conflict equivalent.

We say that a schedule S is conflict serializable if it is

conflict equivalent to a serial schedule

53

Conflict Serializability (Cont.)

Schedule 3 can be transformed into Schedule 6, a serial

schedule where T2 follows T1, by series of swaps of non-

conflicting instructions. Therefore Schedule 3 is conflict

serializable.

Schedule 3 Schedule 6

54

Conflict Serializability (Cont.)

Example of a schedule that is not conflict serializable:

We are unable to swap instructions in the above schedule to

obtain either the serial schedule < T3, T4 >, or the serial

schedule < T4, T3 >.

55

View Serializability

Let S and S´ be two schedules with the same set of transactions. S

and S´ are view equivalent if the following three conditions are met,

for each data item Q,

1. If in schedule S, transaction Ti reads the initial value of Q, then in

schedule S’ also transaction Ti must read the initial value of Q.

2. If in schedule S transaction Ti executes read(Q), and that value

was produced by transaction Tj (if any), then in schedule S’ also

transaction Ti must read the value of Q that was produced by the

same write(Q) operation of transaction Tj .

3. The transaction (if any) that performs the final write(Q) operation

in schedule S must also perform the final write(Q) operation in

schedule S’.

As can be seen, view equivalence is also based purely on reads and

writes alone.

56

Serializability

In concurrency control of databases, transaction processing of an transaction

schedule is serializable if its outcome (e.g., the resulting database state) is

equal to the outcome of its transactions executed serially;

Transactions are normally executed concurrently (they overlap), since this is

the most efficient way.

Serializability is the major correctness criterion for concurrent transactions'

executions.

Serializability is considered the highest level of isolation between transactions,

and plays an essential role in concurrency control. As such it is supported in all

general purpose database systems.

Strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) is a popular serializability mechanism

utilized in most of the database systems (in various variants) since their early

days in the 1970s.

57

View Serializability (Cont.)

A schedule S is view serializable if it is view equivalent to a serial

schedule.

Every conflict serializable schedule is also view serializable.

Below is a schedule which is view-serializable but not conflict

serializable.

What serial schedule is above equivalent to?

Every view serializable schedule that is not conflict serializable has

blind writes.

58

Other Notions of Serializability

The schedule below produces same outcome as the serial

schedule < T1, T5 >, yet is not conflict equivalent or view

equivalent to it.

Determining such equivalence requires analysis of operations

other than read and write.

59

Precedence

Graphs

60

Precedence Graph

Consider some schedule of a set of transactions T1, T2, ..., Tn

A Precedence Graph, also named conflict graph and serializability

graph, is used in the context of concurrency control in databases.

The precedence graph for a schedule S contains:

A node for each committed transaction in S

An arc from Ti to Tj if an action of Ti precedes and conflicts with one

of Tj's actions

We draw an arc from Ti to Tj if the two transaction conflict, and Ti accessed

the data item on which the conflict arose earlier.

We may label the arc by the item that was accessed.

61

Schedule 1 Precedence Graph

62


63


64

Precedence Graph

Graph G = (V,E)

V set of Vertices all the transactions participating in the schedule.

E set of Edges all of the edges Ti Tj for which these three conditions

hold:

1. Ti executes Write(Q) before Tj executes Read(Q)

2. Ti executes Read(Q) before Tj executes Write(Q)

3. Ti executes Write(Q) before Tj executes Write(Q)

If an edge Ti Tj exists in the Precedence Graph, then in any serial schedule

S’ that is equivalent to S it must follow that T1 must appear before Tj

65

Cyclic able Precedence Graph

If the Precedence graph has a cycle, it is not parallelizable.

66

Testing For

Serializability

67

Test for Conflict Serializability

A schedule is conflict serializable if and only

if its precedence graph is acyclic.

Cycle-detection algorithms exist which take

order n2 time, where n is the number of

vertices in the graph.

(Better algorithms take order n + e

where e is the number of edges.)

If precedence graph is acyclic, the

serializability order can be obtained by a

topological sorting of the graph.

This is a linear order consistent with the

partial order of the graph.

For example, a serializability order for

Schedule A would be

T5 T1 T3 T2 T4

68

Test for View Serializability

The precedence graph test for conflict serializability cannot be used

directly to test for view serializability.

Extension to test for view serializability has cost exponential in the

size of the precedence graph.

The problem of checking if a schedule is view serializable falls in the

class of NP-complete problems.

Thus existence of an efficient algorithm is extremely unlikely.

However practical algorithms that just check some sufficient

conditions for view serializability can still be used.

69

Recovery

Schedules

70

Recoverable Schedules

Recoverable schedule — if a transaction Tj reads a data item previously

written by a transaction Ti , then the commit operation of Ti appears before the

commit operation of Tj.

The following schedule is not recoverable if T9 commits immediately after the

read

If T8 should abort, T9 would have read (and possibly shown to the user) an

inconsistent database state. Hence, database must ensure that schedules are

recoverable.

Need to address the effect of transaction failures on concurrently

running transactions.

71

Cascading

Rollbacks

72

Cascading Rollbacks

Cascading rollback – a single transaction failure leads to a series of

transaction rollbacks. Consider the following schedule where none of the

transactions has yet committed (so the schedule is recoverable)

If T10 fails, T11 and T12 must also be rolled back.

Can lead to the undoing of a significant amount of work

73

Cascadeless

Rollbacks

74

Cascadeless Schedules

Cascadeless schedules — cascading rollbacks cannot occur; for

each pair of transactions Ti and Tj such that Tj reads a data item

previously written by Ti, the commit operation of Ti appears before the

read operation of Tj.

Every cascadeless schedule is also recoverable

It is desirable to restrict the schedules to those that are cascadeless

75

Concurrency

Control

76

Concurrency Control

A database must provide a mechanism that will ensure that all possible

schedules are

either conflict or view serializable

AND

are recoverable preferably cascadeless

A policy in which only one transaction can execute at a time generates serial

schedules, but provides a poor degree of concurrency

Are serial schedules recoverable/cascadeless?

Testing a schedule for serializability after it has executed is a little too late!

Goal – to develop concurrency control protocols that will assure serializability.

77

Concurrency Control (Cont.)

Schedules must be conflict or view serializable, and recoverable, for the sake of

database consistency, and preferably cascadeless.

A policy in which only one transaction can execute at a time generates serial

schedules, but provides a poor degree of concurrency.

Concurrency-control schemes tradeoff between the amount of concurrency

they allow and the amount of overhead that they incur.

Some schemes allow only conflict-serializable schedules to be generated, while

others allow view-serializable schedules that are not conflict-serializable.

78

Concurrency Control vs. Serializability Tests

Concurrency-control protocols allow concurrent schedules, but ensure that the

schedules are conflict/view serializable, and are recoverable and cascadeless .

Concurrency control protocols generally do not examine the precedence graph

as it is being created

Instead a protocol imposes a discipline that avoids nonseralizable

schedules.

Different concurrency control protocols provide different tradeoffs between the

amount of concurrency they allow and the amount of overhead that they incur.

Tests for serializability help us understand why a concurrency control protocol

is correct.

79

Weak Levels of Consistency

Some applications are willing to live with weak levels of consistency, allowing

schedules that are not serializable

E.g. a read-only transaction that wants to get an approximate total balance

of all accounts

E.g. database statistics computed for query optimization can be

approximate (why?)

Such transactions need not be serializable with respect to other

transactions

Tradeoff accuracy for performance

80

Levels of Consistency in SQL-92

Serializable — default

Repeatable read — only committed records to be read, repeated reads of same

record must return same value. However, a transaction may not be serializable

– it may find some records inserted by a transaction but not find others.

Read committed — only committed records can be read, but successive reads

of record may return different (but committed) values.

Read uncommitted — even uncommitted records may be read.

Lower degrees of consistency useful for gathering approximate

information about the database

Warning: some database systems do not ensure serializable schedules by

default

E.g. Oracle and PostgreSQL by default support a level of consistency

called snapshot isolation (not part of the SQL standard)

81

Transaction Definition in SQL

Data manipulation language must include a construct for specifying

the set of actions that comprise a transaction.

In SQL, a transaction begins implicitly.

A transaction in SQL ends by:

Commit work commits current transaction and begins a new one.

Rollback work causes current transaction to abort.

In almost all database systems, by default, every SQL statement also

commits implicitly if it executes successfully

Implicit commit can be turned off by a database directive

82

Database Systems

CSCI 3343

Dr. Thomas E. HicksComputer Science Department

Trinity University

83

MySQL Transactions

Create Database Query-Problem-1

Import Query-Problem-1.sql to MySQL on your computer

84

Use LibraryTH;

START TRANSACTION;

COMMIT;

MySQL Transactions - 2

85

Use LibraryTH;

START TRANSACTION;

SET @Month = (SELECT MONTH(Now()));

COMMIT;




86

Use LibraryTH;

START TRANSACTION;

SET @MyMonth = (SELECT MONTH(Now()));

SET @MyDay = (SELECT DAY(Now()));

SET @MyYear = (SELECT YEAR(Now()));

INSERT INTO CheckOut(UserID, Month, Day, Year)

VALUES (21, @MyMonth, @MyDay, @MyYear);

COMMIT;




87

Use LibraryTH;

START TRANSACTION;




SET @NextID = (SELECT MAX(ID) FROM CheckOut) + 1;

INSERT INTO CheckOut(ID, UserID, Month, Day, Year)

VALUES (@NextID, 21, @MyMonth, @MyDay, @MyYear);

COMMIT;


88

Use LibraryTH;

START TRANSACTION;




SET @NextID = (SELECT MAX(ID) FROM CheckOut) + 1;

INSERT INTO CheckOut(ID, UserID, Month, Day, Year)

VALUES (@NextID, 21, @MyMonth, @MyDay, @MyYear);

INSERT INTO CODetail (BookID, CheckOutID)

VALUES (@NextID, 1);

INSERT INTO CODetail (BookID, CheckOutID)

VALUES (@NextID, 10);

COMMIT;

MySQL Stored Procedures

CREATE PROCEDURE test_transaction()

BEGIN

DECLARE EXIT HANDLER FOR SQLEXCEPTION ROLLBACK;

START TRANSACTION;

-- whatever DML operations and SELECT statements you want to

perform go here

IF (1=1) THEN

COMMIT;

ELSE

ROLLBACK;

END IF;

END

89

chapter 1: introductioncarme.cs.trinity.edu/thicks/3343/lectures/... · atomicity failure...

Documents