chapter 1 introduction to forensic science and the law “in school, every period ends with a bell....

38
Chapter 1 Introduction to Forensic Science and the Law “In school, every period ends with a bell. Every sentence ends with a period. Every crime ends with a sentence.” —Stephen Wright, comedian

Upload: allan-stevens

Post on 25-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Chapter 1

Introduction to Forensic Science and the Law

“In school, every period ends with a bell. Every sentence ends with a period. Every crime ends with a sentence.”

—Stephen Wright, comedian

Chapter 1

What Do You Know???Quickly and Honestly try this quiz.

2

Chapter 1 3

Introduction

How a crime lab works The growth and development of

forensic science through history Federal rules of evidence,

including the Frye standard and the Daubert ruling

Basic types of law in the criminal justice system

Students will be able to:Describe how the scientific method

is used to solve forensic problems Describe different jobs done by

forensic scientists and the experts they consult.

Students will learn:

Chapter 1 4

Forensic ScienceThe study and application of science to matters of law.Includes the business of providing timely, accurate, and thorough

information to all levels of decision makers in our criminal justice system.

The word forensic is derived from the Latin “forensis” meaning forum, a public place where, in Roman times, senators and others debated and held judicial proceedings.

Forensic Science cannot offer final and authoritative solutions, however it does play an important and unique role in the criminal justice system by using the scientist's ability to supply accurate and objective information that reflects the events of a crime

Chapter 1

General Goals of a Forensic Scientist are:

The general goals of a forensic scientist are:Recognition of physical evidence Identification of physical evidence Individualization of physical evidenceEvaluation of physical evidenceReconstruction of the crime

5

Chapter 1 6

Criminalistics vs Criminology

Criminalisticsthe scientific

examination of physical evidence for legal purposes.

Criminologyincludes the

psychological angle, studying the crime scene for motive, traits, and behavior that will help to interpret the evidence

Chapter 1 7

Crime Lab—Basic ServicesPhysical Science Unit

ChemistryPhysicsGeology

Biology UnitFirearms UnitDocument Examination

UnitPhotography Unit

Chapter 1 8

Crime Lab—Optional Services

Toxicology UnitLatent Fingerprint UnitPolygraph UnitVoiceprint Analysis UnitEvidence Collection Unit

Chapter 1 9

Some Forensic Science Services• Forensic Medicine• Forensic Pathology• Forensic Anthropology• Forensic Entomology• Forensic Psychiatry• Forensic Odontology• Forensic Engineering• Cybertechnology

Chapter 1

Forensic MedicineThe application of medicine and

medical science to legal problems Practitioners of forensic medicine are

doctors of medicine with special certification in pathology and forensic pathology

Most of them are Medical Examiners They are concerned with determining

cause and circumstances in cases of questioned death

They also can be involved in matters of insurance claims, and sometimes cases of malpractice

10

Chapter 1

Forensic OdontologyCommonly called Forensic

DentistryThe application of dentistry to

human identification problems Forensic odontologists are

dentists who specialize in the forensic aspect of their field

They are concerned with the identification of persons based upon their dentition, usually in cases of otherwise unrecognizable bodies or in mass disasters

They also analyze and compare bite mark evidence

11

Chapter 1

Forensic AnthropologyPersonal identification based on bodily

remains (particularly skeletal) Practitioners are anthropologists who are

interested in Forensic Science Other areas of forensic anthropology

include: Maintaining databases on bodily

structures as functions of race, sex, age, stature, and so forth

Facial reconstruction Interpretation of footprint or shoe-

print evidence

12

Chapter 1

Forensic ToxicologyThe determination of

toxic substances in human tissues and organs

Much of the work concerns the role toxic agents may have played in causing or contributing to the death of a person

13

Chapter 1

Trace Evidence AnalysisIncludes all areas of trace and

transfer evidence such as: soil and glass hair and fibers blood physiological fluids arson accelerant and explosive

residues drug identification different patterns and imprints

14

Chapter 1

Questioned Document AnalysisThe comparison and

interpretation of ...handwritingmechanically produced

material (typing, printing)photocopied material

The analysis of paper, inks, and other materials used to produce documents

15

Chapter 1

Firearm IdentificationFirearm identification Comparison of markings on

bullets, cartridge cases, and shell cases

Determining if a bullet has been fired from a particular weapon

Toolmark examinations are concerned with the association of a particular impression with a particular tool

16

Chapter 1

Fingerprint AnalysisClassification of

fingerprints Maintaining fingerprint

databases Development and lifting

of latent prints Comparisons of known

and unknown fingerprints to determine a match

17

Chapter 1 Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company 18

Major Crime Laboratories

FBIDEAATFU.S. Postal ServiceU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

19

Chapter 1 19

Crime Lab HistoryFirst police crime lab in the world was established in

France in 1910 by Edmond LocardFirst police crime lab in the U.S. opened in 1923 in Los

AngelesThe Scientific Crime Detection Lab was founded in

Evanston, Illinois in 1929The first FBI crime lab opened in 1932

Chapter 1 20

Major Developments in Forensic Science History

700s AD—Chinese used fingerprints to establish identity of documents and clay sculptures

~1000—Roman courts determined that bloody palm prints were used to frame a man in his brother’s murder

1149—King Richard of England introduced the idea of the coroner to investigate questionable death

1200s—A murder in China is solved when flies were attracted to invisible blood residue on a sword of a man in the community

1598—Fidelus was first to practice forensic medicine in Italy1670—Anton Van Leeuwenhoek constructed the first high-

powered microscope1776—Paul Revere identified the body of General Joseph

Warren based on the false teeth he had made for him1784—John Toms convicted of murder on basis of torn edge of

wad of paper in pistol matching a piece of paper in his pocket

Chapter 1 21

Major Developments in Forensic Science History

1859—Gustav Kirchhoff and Robert Bunsen developed the science of spectroscopy.

1864—Crime scene photography developed1879—Alphonse Bertillon developed a system to identify people

using particular body measurements1896—Edward Henry developed first classification system for

fingerprint identification1900—Karl Landsteiner identified human blood groups1904—Edmond Locard formulated his famous principle, “Every

contact leaves a trace.”1922—Francis Aston developed the mass spectrometer.1959—James Watson and Francis Crick discover the DNA double

helix1977—AFIS developed by FBI, fully automated in 19961984—Jeffreys developed and used first DNA tests to be applied to

a criminal case

Chapter 1 22

People of Historical Significance

Edmond Locard (1877-1966)

French professorConsidered the father of

criminalisticsBuilt the world’s first forensic

laboratory in France in 1910Locard Exchange Principle

Whenever two objects come into contact with each other, traces of each are exchanged.

Chapter 1 23

Crime Scene TeamA group of professional investigators, each trained in a variety of special

disciplines.Team Members

First Police Officer on the sceneMedics (if necessary)Investigator(s)Medical Examiner or Representative (if necessary)Photographer and/or Field Evidence TechnicianLab Experts

pathologist serologistDNA expert toxicologistforensic odontologist forensic anthropologistforensic psychologist forensic entomologistfirearm examiner bomb and arson expertdocument and handwriting experts fingerprint expert

Chapter 1 24

Scientific Method(as it pertains to criminalistics)

1. Observe a problem or questioned evidence and collect objective data.

2. Consider a hypothesis or possible solution.3. Examine, test, and then analyze the

evidence.4. Determine the significance of the evidence.5. Formulate a theory based on evaluation of

the significance of the evidence

Chapter 1 25

Complex Reasoning SkillsNecessary to Work Through and Solve Crimes:Deductive and Inductive ReasoningClassifyingComparing and ContrastingProblem SolvingAnalyzing PerspectivesConstructing SupportError Analysis

Chapter 1 26

Laws that Pertain to the U.S. Criminal Justice System

The U.S. ConstitutionStatutory LawCommon Law or Case LawCivil LawCriminal LawEquity LawAdministrative Law

Chapter 1 28

Types of Law

Statutory Law - is written or coded law based on the Constitution

Common Law - or case law is made by judges. The US Supreme Court carries the greatest influence. Oncea decision is made in court, it is written down and becomes law.

Civil Law - The law that deals with noncriminal suits broughtto protect or preserve a civil or private right or matter.

Criminal Law - or public law, deals with regulation and enforcement of rights.

Chapter 1 27

The Bill of RightsGives individuals the right:

To be presumed innocent until proven guilty

Not to be searched unreasonablyNot to be arrested without probable

causeAgainst unreasonable seizure of

personal propertyAgainst self-incriminationTo fair questioning by policeTo protection from physical harm

throughout the justice processTo an attorneyTo trial by juryTo know any charges against oneself

To cross-examine prosecution witnesses

To speak and present witnessesNot to be tried again for the same

crimeAgainst cruel and unusual punishmentTo due processTo a speedy trialAgainst excessive bailAgainst excessive finesTo be treated the same as others,

regardless of race, gender, religious preference, country of origin, and other personal attributes

Chapter 1 30

Probable Cause

Situation in which a reasonable and prudent person viewing the available information, would conclude that a crime has been committed and that the suspect committed it.

Chapter 1 28

Miranda v ArizonaIn 1963, Ernesto Miranda, a 23 year old mentally

disturbed man, was accused of kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman in Phoenix, Arizona. He was brought in for questioning, and confessed to the crime. He was not told that he did not have to speak or that he could have a lawyer present. At trial, Miranda's lawyer tried to get the confession thrown out, but the motion was denied. The case went to the Supreme Court in 1966. The Court ruled that the statements made to the police could not be used as evidence, since Mr. Miranda had not been advised of his rights.

Chapter 1 29

Miranda RightsThe following is a minimal Miranda

warning:You have the right to remain silent. Anything

you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at the government’s expense.

Chapter 1 30

Types of CrimesInfraction - minor

offense or petty crime, no more than 1 year in prison

Misdemeanor a minor crime, less than a felony, usually punished with a fine

Felony - a serious crime, such as murder, punishable by more than one year imprisonments up to execution.

Chapter 1 34

Steps in Pursuing Justice

Steps in pursuing justice are complex and different depending on jurisdictions .

Crime Scene is investigatedAfter suspect arrested -

BookingInformed of Miranda RightsArraigned before a JudgeBail may be set if deemed appropriateSuspect enters a pleeFuture court dates are set.

Chapter 1 Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company 31

Federal Rules of EvidenceIn order for evidence to

be admissible, it must be:

Probative—actually prove something

Material—address an issue that is relevant to the particular crime

Expert Witness - the person who presents scientific evidence

Chapter 1 32

Admissibility of Evidence

1923 Frye v. United States

• Scientific evidence is allowed into the courtroom if it is generally accepted by the relevant scientific community. The Frye standard does not offer any guidance on

reliability. The evidence is presented in the trial and

the jury decides if it can be used.

1993 Daubert v. DowAdmissibility is determined by:• Whether the theory or technique

can be tested• Whether the science has been

offered for peer review• Whether the rate of error is

acceptable• Whether the method at issue

enjoys widespread acceptance.• Whether the opinion is relevant

to the issueThe judge decides if the evidence

can be entered into the trial.

These two rulings have had a great influence on whether scientific evidence can be used in court.

Chapter 1 33

Facets of Guilt

Try to prove:

Means—person had the ability to do the crime

Motive—person had a reason to do the crime (not necessary to prove in a court of law)

Opportunity—person can be placed at the crime

Chapter 1 34

“If the Law has made you a witness, remain a man (woman) of science.

You have no victim to avenge, no guilty or innocent person to ruin or save.

You must bear testimony within the limits of science.”

—P.C.H. Brouardel