chapter 12: phase transformations - cheric transformation c fcc fe3c (cementite) ... solidification:...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 1
ISSUES TO ADDRESS...• Transforming one phase into another takes time.
• How does the rate of transformation depend ontime and temperature ?
• Is it possible to slow down transformations so that non-equilibrium structures are formed?
• Are the mechanical properties of non-equilibriumstructures more desirable than equilibrium ones?
Feγ
(Austenite)
Eutectoid transformation
C FCC
Fe3C(cementite)
α(ferrite)
+(BCC)
Chapter 12: Phase Transformations
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 2
Phase TransformationsNucleation
– nuclei (seeds) act as templates on which crystals grow– for nucleus to form rate of addition of atoms to nucleus must be
faster than rate of loss– once nucleated, growth proceeds until equilibrium is attained
Driving force to nucleate increases as we increase ΔT– supercooling (eutectic, eutectoid)– superheating (peritectic)
Small supercooling slow nucleation rate - few nuclei - large crystals
Large supercooling rapid nucleation rate - many nuclei - small crystals
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 3
Solidification: Nucleation Types
• Homogeneous nucleation– nuclei form in the bulk of liquid metal– requires considerable supercooling
(typically 80-300 °C)
• Heterogeneous nucleation– much easier since stable “nucleating surface” is
already present — e.g., mold wall, impurities in liquid phase
– only very slight supercooling (0.1-10 °C)
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 4
r* = critical nucleus: for r < r* nuclei shrink; for r > r* nuclei grow (to reduce energy) Adapted from Fig.12.2(b), Callister & Rethwisch 9e.
Homogeneous Nucleation & Energy Effects
ΔGT = Total Free Energy= ΔGS + ΔGV
Surface Free Energy- destabilizes the nuclei (it takes energy to make an interface)
γ = surface tension
Volume (Bulk) Free Energy –stabilizes the nuclei (releases energy)
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 5
2v
3*
v
*
2v
3
G316G
G2r
0r4dr1Gr
34
dr1
drGd
22v
2m
3
2v
3*
v
m
v
*
m
v
m
mv
m
vvvvv
TH3T16
G316G
THT2
G2r
TTH
TTTH
THTHSTHG
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 6
Solidification
Note: ΔHf and γ are weakly dependent on ΔT
r* decreases as ΔT increases
For typical ΔT r* ~ 10 nm
ΔHf = latent heat of solidificationTm = melting temperatureγ = surface free energy
ΔT = Tm - T = supercooling
r* = critical radius
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 7
22
23
2
3*
3
16
3
16
TH
T
GG
v
m
v
THT2
G2r
v
m
v
*
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016
Nucleation Kinetics
8
d
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 9
Heterogeneous Nucleation
)(SGG
G316G
G2r
cos
*ohom
*hetero
2v
3SL*
hetero
V
SL*
SLSIIL
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 10
Rate of Phase Transformations
Kinetics - study of reaction rates of phase transformations
• To determine reaction rate – measure degree of transformation as function of time (while holding temp constant)
measure propagation of sound waves –on single specimen
electrical conductivity measurements –on single specimen
X-ray diffraction – many specimens requiredHow is degree of transformation measured?
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 11
Rate of Phase Transformation
Jonson-Mehl-Avrami (JMA) equation => x = 1- exp (-kt n)K: reaction rate constantn : Avrami exponent
transformation complete
log tFrac
tion
trans
form
ed, x
Fixed T
fraction transformed
time
0.5
By convention rate = 1 / t0.5
Fig. 12.10, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.
maximum rate reached – now amount unconverted decreases so rate slows
t0.5
rate increases as interfacial surface areaincreases & nuclei grow
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 12
Rate of Phase TransformationThe kinetics of recrystallization for some alloys obey the JMA equation and the Avrami exponent, n, is 3.1. If the fraction of recrystallized is 0.3after 20 min, determine the rate of recrystallization.
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 13
Temperature Dependence of Transformation Rate
• For the recrystallization of Cu, sincerate = 1/t0.5
rate increases with increasing temperature
• Rate often so slow that attainment of equilibrium state not possible!
Fig. 12.11, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.(Reprinted with permission from Metallurgical Transactions, Vol. 188, 1950, a publication of The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, PA. Adapted from B. F. Decker and D. Harker, “Recrystallization in Rolled Copper,” Trans. AIME, 188, 1950, p. 888.)
135C 119C 113C 102C 88C 43C
1 10 102 104
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 14
Transformations & Undercooling
• For transf. to occur, must cool to below 727 oC (i.e., must “undercool”)
• Eutectoid transf. (Fe-Fe3C system): γ α + Fe3C0.76 wt% C
0.022 wt% C6.7 wt% C
Fe3C
(cem
entit
e)
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
4000 1 2 3 4 5 6 6.7
L
γ(austenite)
γ+L
γ+Fe3C
α+Fe3C
L+Fe3C
δ
(Fe) C, wt%C
1148°C
T(°C)
αferrite
727°C
Eutectoid:Equil. Cooling: Ttransf. = 727°CΔTUndercooling by Ttransf. < 727°C
0.76
0.02
2Fig. 11.23, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. [Adapted from Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd edition, Vol. 1, T. B. Massalski (Editor-in-Chief), 1990. Reprinted by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 15
The Fe-Fe3C Eutectoid Transformation
Coarse pearlite formed at higher temperatures – relatively softFine pearlite formed at lower temperatures – relatively hard
• Transformation of austenite to pearlite:
Adapted from Fig. 11.14, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.
γαααα
α
α
pearlite growth direction
Austenite (γ)grain boundary
cementite (Fe3C)Ferrite (α)
γ
• For this transformation,rate increases with [Teutectoid – T ] (i.e., ΔT). Adapted from
Fig. 12.12, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.
675°C (ΔT smaller)
0
50y
(% p
earli
te)
600°C (ΔT larger)
650°C
100
Diffusion of C during transformation
α
αγ γ
αCarbon diffusion
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 16
Fig. 12.13, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.[Adapted from H. Boyer (Editor), Atlas of Isothermal Transformation and Cooling Transformation Diagrams, 1977. Reproduced by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
Generation of Isothermal Transformation Diagrams
• The Fe-Fe3C system, for C0 = 0.76 wt% C• A transformation temperature of 675 ºC.
100
50
01 102 104
T = 675°C
y,
% tr
ansf
orm
ed
time (s)
400
500
600
700
1 10 102 103 104 105
Austenite (stable) TE (727 oC)Austenite (unstable)
Pearlite
T(°C)
time (s)
isothermal transformation at 675°C
Consider:
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 17
• Eutectoid composition, C0 = 0.76 wt% C• Begin at T > 727°C• Rapidly cool to 625 oC• Hold T (625 oC) constant (isothermal treatment)
Fig. 12.14, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.[Adapted from H. Boyer (Editor), Atlas of Isothermal Transformation and Cooling Transformation Diagrams, 1977. Reproduced by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
Austenite-to-Pearlite Isothermal Transformation
400
500
600
700
Austenite (stable) TE (727 oC)Austenite (unstable)
Pearlite
T(ºC)
1 10 102 103 104 105
time (s)
γ γ
γγ γ
γ
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016
Fig. 11.23, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. [Adapted from Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd edition, Vol. 1, T. B. Massalski (Editor-in-Chief), 1990. Reprinted by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
18
Transformations Involving Noneutectoid Compositions
Hypereutectoid composition – proeutectoid cementite
Consider C0 = 1.13 wt% C
a
TE (727°C)
T(oC)
time (s)
A
A
A+C
P
1 10 102 103 104
500
700
900
600
800
A+
P
Fig. 12.16, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. [Adapted from H. Boyer (Editor), Atlas of Isothermal Transformation and Cooling Transformation Diagrams, 1977. Reproduced by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
Fe3C
(cem
entit
e)
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
4000 1 2 3 4 5 6 6.7
L
γ(austenite)
γ+L
γ+Fe3C
α+Fe3C
L+Fe3C
δ
(Fe) C, wt%C
T(oC)
727°C
0.76
0.02
2
1.13
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 19
10 103 105
time (s)10-1
400
600
800
T(°C)Austenite (stable)
200
P
B
TEA
A
Bainite: Another Fe-Fe3C Transformation Product
• Bainite:-- elongated Fe3C particles in
α-ferrite matrix-- diffusion controlled
• Isothermal Transf. Diagram, C0 = 0.76 wt% C
Fig. 12.18, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. [Adapted from H. Boyer (Editor), Atlas of Isothermal Transformation and Cooling Transformation Diagrams, 1977. Reproduced by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
Fig. 12.17, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. (From Metals Handbook, Vol. 8, 8th edition,Metallography, Structures and Phase Diagrams,1973. Reproduced by permission of ASMInternational, Materials Park, OH.)
Fe3C(cementite)
5 μm
α (ferrite)
100% bainite
100% pearlite
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 20
• Spheroidite:-- Fe3C particles within an α-ferrite matrix-- formation requires diffusion-- heat bainite or pearlite at temperature
just below eutectoid for long times-- driving force – reduction
of α-ferrite/Fe3C interfacial area
Spheroidite: Another Microstructure for the Fe-Fe3C System
Fig. 12.19, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. (Copyright United States Steel Corporation, 1971.)
60 μm
α(ferrite)
(cementite)Fe3C
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 21
• Martensite:-- γ(FCC) to Martensite (BCT)
Fig. 12.21, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. (Courtesy United States Steel Corporation.)
Adapted from Fig. 12.20, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.
Martensite: A Nonequilibrium Transformation Product
Martensite needlesAustenite
60 μ
m
현재 이이미지를 표시할 수없습니다 .
현재 이이미지를 표시할 수없습니다 .
xx x
xx
x potential C atom sites
Fe atom sites
Adapted from Fig. 12.22, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.
• Isothermal Transf. Diagram
• γ to martensite (M) transformation.-- is rapid! (diffusionless)-- % transformation depends only
on T to which rapidly cooled
10 103 105 time (s)10-1
400
600
800
T(°C)Austenite (stable)
200
P
B
TEA
A
M + AM + A
M + A
0%50%90%
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 22
γ (FCC) α (BCC) + Fe3C
Martensite Formation
slow cooling
tempering
quench
M (BCT)
Martensite (M) – single phase – has body centered tetragonal (BCT)
crystal structure
Diffusionless transformation BCT if C0 > 0.15 wt% CBCT few slip planes hard, brittle
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 23
Phase Transformations of AlloysEffect of adding other elements
Change transition temp.
Cr, Ni, Mo, Si, Mnretard γ α + Fe3C reaction (and formation of pearlite, bainite)
Fig. 12.23, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. [Adapted from H. Boyer (Editor), Atlas of Isothermal Transformation and Cooling Transformation Diagrams, 1977. Reproduced by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 24
Continuous Cooling Transformation Diagrams
Conversion of isothermal transformation diagram to continuous cooling transformation diagram
Cooling curve
Fig. 12.25, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. [Adapted from H. Boyer (Editor), Atlas of Isothermal Transformation and Cooling Transformation Diagrams, 1977. Reproduced by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 25
Isothermal Heat Treatment Example Problems
On the isothermal transformation diagram for a 0.45 wt% C, Fe-C alloy, sketch and label the time-temperature paths to produce the following microstructures:a) 42% proeutectoid ferrite and 58% coarse
pearliteb) 50% fine pearlite and 50% bainitec) 100% martensited) 50% martensite and 50% austenite
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 26
Solution to Part (a) of Example Problem
a) 42% proeutectoid ferrite and 58% coarse pearlite
Isothermally treat at ~ 680°C
-- all austenite transforms to proeutectoid α and coarse pearlite.
A + B
A + P
A + αA
BP
A50%
0
200
400
600
800
0.1 10 103 105time (s)
M (start)M (50%)M (90%)
Fe-Fe3C phase diagram, for C0 = 0.45 wt% C
T (°C)
Figure 12.39, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.(Adapted from Atlas of Time-Temperature Diagrams for Irons and Steels, G. F. Vander Voort, Editor, 1991. Reprinted by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.)
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 27
b) 50% fine pearlite and 50% bainite
Solution to Part (b) of Example Problem
T (ºC)
A + B
A + P
A + αA
BP
A50%
0
200
400
600
800
0.1 10 103 105time (s)
M (start)M (50%)M (90%)
Fe-Fe3C phase diagram, for C0 = 0.45 wt% C
Then isothermally treat at ~ 470°C
– all remaining austenite transforms to bainite.
Isothermally treat at ~ 590°C – 50% of austenite transforms
to fine pearlite.
Figure 12.39, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.(Adapted from Atlas of Time-Temperature Diagrams for Irons and Steels, G. F. Vander Voort, Editor, 1991. Reprinted by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.)
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 28
Solutions to Parts (c) & (d) of Example Problem
c) 100% martensite – rapidly quench to room temperature
d) 50% martensite & 50% austenite
-- rapidly quench to ~ 290°C, hold at this temperature
T (°C)
A + B
A + P
A + αA
BP
A50%
0
200
400
600
800
0.1 10 103 105time (s)
M (start)M (50%)M (90%)
Fe-Fe3C phase diagram, for C0 = 0.45 wt% C
d)
c)Figure 12.39, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.(Adapted from Atlas of Time-Temperature Diagrams for Irons and Steels, G. F. Vander Voort, Editor, 1991. Reprinted by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.)
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 29
Mechanical Props: Influence of C Content
Fig. 11.29, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. (Courtesy of Republic Steel Corporation.)
• Increase C content: TS and YS increase, %EL decreases
C0 < 0.76 wt% CHypoeutectoid
Pearlite (med)ferrite (soft)
Fig. 11.32, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. (Copyright 1971 by United States Steel Corporation.)
C0 > 0.76 wt% CHypereutectoid
Pearlite (med)Cementite
(hard)
Fig. 12.29, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. [Data taken from Metals Handbook: Heat Treating, Vol. 4, 9th edition, V. Masseria (Managing Editor), 1981. Reproduced by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
300
500
700
900
1100YS(MPa)TS(MPa)
wt% C0 0.5 1
hardness0.
76
Hypo Hyper
wt% C0 0.5 10
50
100%EL
Impa
ct e
nerg
y (Iz
od, f
t-lb)
0
40
80
0.76
Hypo Hyper
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 30
Mechanical Props: Fine Pearlite vs. Coarse Pearlite vs. Spheroidite
Fig. 12.30, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. [Data taken from Metals Handbook: Heat Treating, Vol. 4, 9th edition, V. Masseria (Managing Editor), 1981. Reproduced by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.]
• Hardness:• %RA:
fine > coarse > spheroiditefine < coarse < spheroidite
80
160
240
320
wt%C0 0.5 1
Brin
ell h
ardn
ess
fine pearlite
coarsepearlitespheroidite
Hypo Hyper
0
30
60
90
wt%C
Duc
tility
(%R
A)
fine pearlite
coarsepearlite
spheroidite
Hypo Hyper
0 0.5 1
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 31
Mechanical Props: Fine Pearlite vs. Martensite
• Hardness: fine pearlite << martensite.
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 32
Tempered Martensite• tempered martensite less brittle than martensite• tempering reduces internal stresses caused by quenching
Figure 12.33, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. (Copyright 1971 by United States Steel Corporation.)
• tempering decreases TS, YS but increases %RA• tempering produces extremely small Fe3C particles surrounded by α.
Fig. 12.34, Callister & Rethwisch 9e. (Adapted from Edgar C. Bain, Functions of the Alloying Elements in Steel, 1939. Reproduced by permission of ASM International, Materials Park, OH.)
9 μm
YS(MPa)TS(MPa)
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
30405060
200 400 600Tempering T (°C)
%RA
TS
YS
%RA
Heat treat martensite to form tempered martensite
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 33
Shape Memory AlloyNitinol: (Ni-Ti Naval Ordnance Laboratory)
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016
Shape Memory Effect
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016
Pseudo Elasticity (Super Elasticity)
Chapter 12 -AMSE 205 Spring ‘2016 36
Summary of Possible TransformationsAdapted from Fig. 12.36, Callister & Rethwisch 9e.
Austenite (γ)
Pearlite(α + Fe3C layers + a proeutectoid phase)
slow cool
Bainite(α + elong. Fe3C particles)
moderatecool
Martensite(BCT phase diffusionless
transformation)
rapid quench
Tempered Martensite (α + very fine
Fe3C particles)
reheat
Stre
ngth
Duc
tility
Martensite T Martensite
bainite fine pearlite
coarse pearlite spheroidite
General Trends