chapter 18 domestic policy © 2009, pearson education fiorina, peterson, johnson, and mayer new...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 18 Domestic Policy
© 2009, Pearson Education
Fiorina, Peterson, Johnson, and Mayer
New American Democracy, Sixth Edition
© 2009, Pearson Education
Types of Public PolicyPublic policy is a term applied to all government programs and regulations– Classified as foreign and domestic
Foreign policy– Involves relations with other nations
Domestic policy– Consists of all government programs and
regulations that directly affect those living within a country
– Includes everything from education and health care to transportation and garbage collection
– Economic policies generally most important. Here we focus on other domestic policies
© 2009, Pearson Education
Stages of Policy Making1. Agenda setting: making an issue so visible that important
political leaders take it seriously
2. Policy deliberation: debate and discussion by groups and political leaders about issues placed on the policy agenda
3. Policy enactment: passage of law by public officials
4. Policy implementation: translation of legislation into set of government programs or regulations
5. Policy outputs: provision of services to citizens or regulation of their conduct
6. Policy outcomes: effect of policy outputs on individuals and businesses
TANF example illustrates the way politics affect the various stages of the policy round.
© 2009, Pearson Education
Social PolicySocial policy is a type of domestic policy that is designed to help those thought to be in need of government assistance
One of central issues:
– Balance of government assistance between elderly and young
– Elderly have done well in securing government help
– U.S. healthiest place to grow old but riskiest place to be born. Why?
© 2009, Pearson Education
Social Insurance for Senior Citizens
1935 Congress enacted the landmark Social Security Act
– Created a broad range of social programs, including a social insurance program for seniors generally known as Social Security
Social security originally cost the government little
– Those who first retired under the program received minimal benefits because they had not paid into the program significantly
– Moreover, people retiring at age 65 were only expected to live an average of 13 more years
– Today a retiring worker is expected to live at least 18 more years
– As program expanded, more people paid in, and were covered
© 2009, Pearson Education
Social Insurance for Senior Citizens
Insurance principle
Social Security differs from an insurance program in that it operates at a loss
How could it survive when benefits exceeded contributions?
– Workers grew in number compared to those in the past
– Workers produced and earned more than those in the past
– Workers paid a higher percentage of their earnings than in the past
– But, rate of worker growth has declined,
– Rates of economic productivity may not be as high,
– Workers may be less willing to pay higher taxes
© 2009, Pearson Education
Politics of Social Insurance
The risks of change to social security
– Punishment by voters
Complexities of Medicare
– Cost of program grew from $36 billion in 1970 to more than $330 billion in 2005
• Number of elderly growing, increasing demand for medical services
• Doctors able to use better and more expensive technology
• Patients expect error-free medicine. Sue over mistakes, and this drives up medical insurance costs.
– Politicians have been reluctant to engage in cost-saving proposals and are moving in the opposite direction.
• Drug benefit plan supported by Bush and passed by Congress may add $700 billion to the cost of Medicare from 2005–2015
© 2009, Pearson Education
Politics of Social InsuranceInfluence of Senior Citizens
– Seniors are much more likely than young people to back up their votes with political actions
– AARP is a large and influential interest group
Broad Support
– People generally support benefits for senior citizens
• hope to benefit themselves one day
• many have parents receiving these benefits
• believe that since seniors contributed to the benefit, they should be guaranteed the benefits promised
© 2009, Pearson Education
Public Assistance to Poor Families
Public Assistance offers programs that provide low-income households with income subsidies and access to essential goods and services
Safety nets
– Temporary assistance to needy families
– Food stamps
– Earned income tax credit
– Supplemental Security Income
– Rent subsidies
– Medicaid (includes services for low-income elderly)
© 2009, Pearson Education
Limitations on Public Assistance Programs
While the list of programs seems impressive, the government spends more than twice as much on social security and Medicare as it spends on all those programs combined
Why?
– Fewer cash benefits
– Less indexation
– Assistance, not insurance
– State, not national programs
– Benefits cannot supplement income
© 2009, Pearson Education
Politics of Public Assistance
Programs for poor families with children are poorly- funded and restrictively-designed, because unlike the elderly, children and the poor do not exercise direct political power
What of those working on their behalf?
– Policy analysts offer competing explanations of persistence of poverty
– Weak interest groups that fight among themselves
– A divided public
– Opportunistic political parties
© 2009, Pearson Education
Politics of Public AssistancePolicy Debate: before government can design
solutions, it has to decide what the problem isPolicy experts disagree about the causes of poverty among families with childrenThree different theories have shaped the welfare debate:– Liberal theory– Conservative theory– Postindustrial economy theory
Other factors that influence the debate:– Group organization– Public opinion– Political parties
© 2009, Pearson Education
Education PolicyEducation policy has become a significant topic of public debate
Historically supportive of public school, now concerned with issues of quality
Responsibility for education is divided
– Local school boards
– State departments of education
– Federal Department of Education
Bulk of control at state and local level
© 2009, Pearson Education
Development of Public EducationDevelopment of public education
1785 Congress set aside revenue for the maintenance of public schools
Accessible to immigrants
Fostered common language
Open to most citizens
Reinforced a distinctive American identity built around the concepts of liberty and equality
Created educated workforce that operated the machines that would make the country an industrial power
© 2009, Pearson Education
Contemporary Issues in Education Policy
Teacher salaries have declined since 1970
Governments in the U.S. spend 3.8 percent of the U.S. GDP on primary and secondary education
– Japan and German spend still less;
– Other countries, such as Canada, Sweden and France, spend more
And we appear to do less well than other countries in terms of educational outcomes relative to expenditures
© 2009, Pearson Education
Contemporary Issues in Education Policy
Three major sets of proposals that seem to improve our educational system
– School choice
– Set of national standards
• 2002 No Child Left Behind
• Underfunded; bait and switch?
– Provide schools with greater resources
Each set of proposals has its critics and advocates.
What do you think?
© 2009, Pearson Education
Politics of Education
In the past, public schools were beyond partisan dispute
Today, our two major parties have begun to disagree over a broad range of educational issues
Both parties remain strongly committed to public education
© 2009, Pearson Education
Regulation and Its RiseGovernment regulation
– Rules and standards that control economic, social, and political activities
Although Congress can pass regulations, it usually gives the responsibility to agencies within the executive branch
Regulation dates back to feudal times
Constitution gives Congress power to regulate commerce
– Commerce clause has extended regulation from civil rights to national insurance standards
© 2009, Pearson Education
The Rise of Federal RegulationThree distinct periods of regulator increase
Progressive era– Muckrakers exposed abuses of industrialization and
focused on abuses of large corporations, as well as other abuses
– Sherman Act (1890) and Meat Inspection Act of 1906
New Deal era (1930s)– Prevent practices that were thought to have caused the
Great Depression
1960s and 1970s– Focus on consumer safety, occupational safely, and
environmental protection– Environmental Protection Agency
© 2009, Pearson Education
Justification for Regulation
The government now regulates many business and social activities
Why have the regulatory responsibilities of government expanded so dramatically over the past 50 years?
Three broad types of circumstances in which they find government regulation most easily justified:
– Natural monopoly
– Negative externalities
– Protecting the uninformed
© 2009, Pearson Education
Politics of RegulationWhen and how regulations are imposed are political decisions
– Shaped by election pressures
Congress:
– Create regulatory agencies in order to escape criticism when things go wrong
– Also to avoid being blamed by not directly imposing the regulations but handing the job off to a regulatory agency
© 2009, Pearson Education
Politics of RegulationBlame avoidance
Agency Discretion
– Because Congress can pass ambiguous legislation, agencies may have considerable freedom in deciding how to execute their mandates
– Not limitless: “zone of acceptance” is the range within which Congress allows agencies to interpret and apply statutes.
© 2009, Pearson Education
Politics of RegulationCourts
– Interpret the meaning of congressional statutes and decide whether their application in specific cases conforms to congressional intent
– Have considerable discretion because they often must interpret vague and contradictory laws passed by Congress
• Example: 1973 Endangered Species Act
© 2009, Pearson Education
DeregulationDeregulation
– Involves the removal of government rules that once controlled an industry
Address concerns that stem from the negative impact of regulation
Example: the airline industry
– Airline fares were regulated by the government in order to prevent price gouging
– According to analysts, the outcome was the opposite of its intent