chapter 2: land use, zoning, and public policy a. introduction · the fresh kills park fgeis...

4
2-1 Chapter 2: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter relies on the analysis from the Fresh Kills Park Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (FGEIS) and summarizes the conclusions drawn from that analysis. No additional analysis was warranted for this SEIS as it pertains to Chapter 2, “Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy.” The Fresh Kills Park FGEIS examined the proposed park’s consistency with respect to land use and land development trends, zoning regulations, and applicable public policy. The Fresh Kills Park site fronts the Arthur Kill waterfront to the west and Richmond Avenue to the east. It is bisected by the West Shore Expressway. To the north is the William T. Davis Wildlife Refuge. The southern boundary is generally defined by Arthur Kill Road. As discussed in Chapter 1, “Project Description,” Fresh Kills Park requires a number of City, State, and Federal land use and environmental approvals to implement the proposed park. With respect to local (City of New York) land use regulations, these include: Amendment to the City map to establish as parkland those portions of this project site that are not currently mapped as parkland; Amendment to the City map to eliminate unbuilt paper streets; Amendment to the City map to map a public space to serve as the right-of-way for the future vehicular road system, which entails demapping a small portion of the existing mapped parkland; A zoning map amendment to assign a zoning district (M1-1) to the areas being de-mapped as park and simultaneously mapped as public place; A zoning map amendment to vacate the NA-1 zoning where it currently exists on the site; and A zoning text amendment to remove “Fresh Kills Park” from Section 105-941 of the current zoning text. At the State level, approvals that apply to the proposed project include potential amendments to the Consent Order governing landfill closure at the site and/or Part 360 landfill closure approvals for end use; permits for activities in tidal wetlands and adjacent areas, as well as protection of waters; and access to a State highway (Route 440). Federal approvals relate to constructing structures over or in navigable waterways or activities in wetlands as identified by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Additionally, because proposed park roads are proposed to pass through existing parkland, a State legislative action has been obtained for the alienation of parkland. After the actual routes of the roads have been determined, the remaining areas that were alienated, if any, would revert to parkland.

Upload: others

Post on 15-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 2: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION · The Fresh Kills Park FGEIS examined the proposed park’sconsistency with respect to land use and land development

2-1

Chapter 2: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy

A. INTRODUCTION This chapter relies on the analysis from the Fresh Kills Park Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (FGEIS) and summarizes the conclusions drawn from that analysis. No additional analysis was warranted for this SEIS as it pertains to Chapter 2, “Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy.”

The Fresh Kills Park FGEIS examined the proposed park’s consistency with respect to land use and land development trends, zoning regulations, and applicable public policy.

The Fresh Kills Park site fronts the Arthur Kill waterfront to the west and Richmond Avenue to the east. It is bisected by the West Shore Expressway. To the north is the William T. Davis Wildlife Refuge. The southern boundary is generally defined by Arthur Kill Road.

As discussed in Chapter 1, “Project Description,” Fresh Kills Park requires a number of City, State, and Federal land use and environmental approvals to implement the proposed park. With respect to local (City of New York) land use regulations, these include:

• Amendment to the City map to establish as parkland those portions of this project site that are not currently mapped as parkland;

• Amendment to the City map to eliminate unbuilt paper streets; • Amendment to the City map to map a public space to serve as the right-of-way for the future

vehicular road system, which entails demapping a small portion of the existing mapped parkland;

• A zoning map amendment to assign a zoning district (M1-1) to the areas being de-mapped as park and simultaneously mapped as public place;

• A zoning map amendment to vacate the NA-1 zoning where it currently exists on the site; and • A zoning text amendment to remove “Fresh Kills Park” from Section 105-941 of the current

zoning text.

At the State level, approvals that apply to the proposed project include potential amendments to the Consent Order governing landfill closure at the site and/or Part 360 landfill closure approvals for end use; permits for activities in tidal wetlands and adjacent areas, as well as protection of waters; and access to a State highway (Route 440). Federal approvals relate to constructing structures over or in navigable waterways or activities in wetlands as identified by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).

Additionally, because proposed park roads are proposed to pass through existing parkland, a State legislative action has been obtained for the alienation of parkland. After the actual routes of the roads have been determined, the remaining areas that were alienated, if any, would revert to parkland.

Page 2: Chapter 2: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION · The Fresh Kills Park FGEIS examined the proposed park’sconsistency with respect to land use and land development

Fresh Kills Park East Park Roads SEIS

2-2

B. METHODOLOGY The FGEIS land use, zoning, and public policy chapter identified a study area where the land use effects of the proposed park were examined. The study area for this land use, zoning, and public policy analysis was defined as the area within a ½-mile perimeter of the project site, which, according to the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual, is the limit of the area in which direct land use effects of a large project typically occur. The study area consists primarily of open space (City parks and wildlife preserves), and commercial, residential, and industrial uses (see Figure 2-1). In addition, a secondary study area was identified to account for the indirect effects of projects that are expected to take place in the Future without the Proposed Project. The chapter addressed any impacts to land use, zoning, and public policy.

C. CONCLUSIONS It was the conclusion of the Fresh Kills Park FGEIS that the proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts with respect to land use, zoning, and development trends in the area. Although the proposed project does not involve mapping at this time, the mapping proposed in the FGEIS would be compatible with the nearby zoning and mapped parklands in both the 2016 and 2036 analysis years (see Figure 2-2). There are no potential adverse impacts to the project site or the surrounding wetlands or natural areas if the existing NA-1 zoning designation is removed. The NA-1 designation is proposed to be removed to reflect the existing condition at the site which is a closed and highly engineered landfill, with areas of tidal and freshwater wetlands. Both the closed landfill and the natural areas make the site particularly subject to DEC’s rigorous scrutiny, which is the more appropriate form of regulation, better suited than the NA-1 regulatory regime, to assess and balance the requirements of a closed landfill with the needs of the natural areas. Additionally, the proposed project would not conflict with current public policy for the area. In fact, it would implement City policy with respect to future uses at Fresh Kills. The project would introduce park uses on the site of a former landfill and a large expanse of underutilized City land, which is well served by existing highways with opportunities for water access for the public. Additionally, the proposed project would preserve wetlands and add 2,163 acres of new public space along the waterfront. For these reasons, the proposed project would not result in any significant adverse impacts related to land use, zoning, or public policy.

These conclusions also apply to the SEIS. The proposed East Park roads would not be inconsistent or conflict with local land use, zoning, or public policy objectives.

Page 3: Chapter 2: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION · The Fresh Kills Park FGEIS examined the proposed park’sconsistency with respect to land use and land development

ARDEN AV

Arden HeightsWoodsPark

South ShoreGolf Course Park

Isle ofMeadows

William T. Davis

Wildlife Refuge

LatourettePark

Brookfield Landfill

Arth

ur K

ill

Richmond Creek

Mai

n Cr

eek

Little Fresh Kill

Great Fresh Kill

NewJersey

WillowbrookPark

WES

T SH

ORE EX

PRES

SWAY

ARTHUR K

ILL R

D

VICTORY BLVD

ARDEN AV

TRAVIS AV

WO

OD

RO

W R

D

WIL

D AV

ANN

ADALE R

D

ANN

A DALE R

D

RIC

HM

ON

D P

KWY

GETZ AV

BARLOW AV

ILYSSA WY

WAIN

WR

IGH

T AV

POM

PEY AV

GENESEE AV

W VETERANS RD

ILYSSA WAY

LEVERETT AV

WO

EHR

LE AV

MEREDITH AV

CANNON AV

RID

GEW

OO

D AV

YUKON AV

HALP

IN A

V

LADD AV

HU

GU

ENO

T AV

PAR

K D

R N

RO

SSVILLE AV

STROUD AV

CROW

N AV

SHO

TWELL AV

PLATINUM AV

BARRY ST

BURK AV

CR

OSSFIELD

AV

GLE

NN

ST

JAMIE LA

BERRY AV

MACON AV

ALBERTA AV

MELVIN AV

FOREST HILL RD

LATIM

ER AV

TOKEN ST

SHELLY AV

KENILW

OR

TH AV

CO

DY PL

GO

LD AV

LOVELAC

E AV

TYNAN LA

MU

LBER

RY

AV

VINELA

ND AV

MC

ARTH

UR

AV

GR

ANTW

OO

D AV

MC ARTHUR AV

BRANDIS AV

ROSWELL AV

NEDRA LA

OAK LAWATKINS AV

POPLAR AV

ELTING

VILLE BLVDROCKVILLE AV

CO

RTELYO

U AV

EMILY LA

GA

RY

PL

PARISH AV

LOR

ING

AV

ELTING

EVILLE BLVD

LEGATE AV

READING AV

RIVINGTON AV

BARTLETT AV

SWEE

TBRO

OK RD

WAKEFIELD AV

IBSEN AV

SMYRNA AVPOND ST

GURLEY AV

MIL

DRED

AV

MARNE AV

MIMOSA LA

DOVER GRN

GARY ST

KENMORE ST

BERESFORD AV

RICHMOND HILL RD

PERKIOMEN AV

NOME AV

SUN

FIELD AV

DO

GW

OO

D D

R

KNESEL ST

PLYMOUTH AV

DIERAUF ST

ALEXANDER AV

ALEXAND

ER PL

HAMPTON GREEN

MORRIS ST

W BERRY AV

BOYLAN ST

CHURCH AV

EVAN PL

RAILY CT

DOVER GREEN

WAT

SON

AV

RICHE AV

HINTON ST

PEARSON ST

SLEEPY HOLLOW RD

LOMBARD CT

ROW PL

ROLLIN

G HILL

GRN

DOVER GREEN S

T

SHERILL AV

FOREST GRN

VANALLEN AV

FUTU

RITY PL

MONTEREY AV

STAR CT

OPP CT

TRYON AV

FOREST GREEN

CORELL AV

CRABBS LA

DEBR

A LO

OP

ENG

ERT ST

BENSON ST

COUNTRY LA

FELDMEYERS LA

POETS CIR

SHORELINE

GETZ AV

E DRUMGOOLE RD

MELVIN AV

INDEPENDENCE AV

SCALE

0 4000 FEET2000

N

Existing Land UseFigure 2-1FRESH KILLS PARK EAST PARK ROADS • SEIS

4.16

.09

Fresh Kills Project Site Boundary

Study Area Boundary(1/2-Mile Perimeter)

Industrial/DSNY Facilities

Fresh Kills Project Area

Residential

Residential (with Ground-Floor Retail)

Commercial

Office

Institutional

Open Space

Vacant Parcels

Vacant Building

Under Construction

Open Space Under Construction

Page 4: Chapter 2: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION · The Fresh Kills Park FGEIS examined the proposed park’sconsistency with respect to land use and land development

ARDEN AV

Arden HeightsWoodsPark

South ShoreGolf Course

Park

Isle ofMeadows

William T. Davis

Wildlife Refuge

LatourettePark

Brookfield Landfill

Arth

ur K

ill

Richmond Creek

Mai

n Cr

eek

Little Fresh Kill

Great Fresh Kill

NewJersey

WillowbrookPark

WES

T SH

ORE EX

PRES

SWAY

ARTHUR K

ILL R

D

VICTORY BLVD

ARDEN AV

TRAVIS AV

WO

OD

RO

W R

D

WIL

D AV

ANN

ADALE R

D

ANN

A DALE R

D

RIC

HM

ON

D P

KWY

GETZ AV

BARLOW AV

ILYSSA WY

WAIN

WR

IGH

T AV

POM

PEY AV

GENESEE AV

W VETERANS RD

ILYSSA WAY

LEVERETT AV

WO

EHR

LE AV

MEREDITH AV

CANNON AV

RID

GEW

OO

D AV

YUKON AV

LADD AV

HU

GU

ENO

T AV

PAR

K D

R N

RO

SSVILLE AV

STROUD AV

SHO

TWELL AV

PLATINUM AV

BURK AV

CR

OSSFIELD

AV

GLE

NN

ST

JAMIE LA

BERRY AV

MACON AV

ALBERTA AV

MELVIN AV

FOREST HILL RD

LATIM

ER AV

TOKEN ST

SHELLY AV

KENILW

OR

TH AV

CO

DY PL

GO

LD AV

LOVELAC

E AV

TYNAN LA

MU

LBER

RY

AV

VINELA

ND AV

MC

ARTH

UR

AV

GR

ANTW

OO

D AV

MC ARTHUR AV

BRANDIS AV

ROSWELL AV

NEDRA LA

OAK LAWATKINS AV

POPLAR AV

ELTING

VILLE BLVDROCKVILLE AV

CO

RTELYO

U AV

EMILY LA

GA

RY

PL

PARISH AV

LOR

ING

AV

ELTING

EVILLE BLVD

LEGATE AV

READING AV

RIVINGTON AV

BARTLETT AV

SWEE

TBRO

OK RD

WAKEFIELD AV

IBSEN AV

POND ST

GURLEY AV

MIL

DRED

AV

MARNE AV

DOVER GRN

GARY ST

KENMORE ST

BERESFORD AV

RICHMOND HILL RD

PERKIOMEN AV

NOME AV

SUN

FIELD AV

KNESEL ST

PLYMOUTH AV

INDEPENDENCE AV

DIERAUF ST

ALEXANDER AV

ALEXAND

ER PL

HAMPTON GREEN

MORRIS ST

W BERRY AV

BOYLAN ST

CHURCH AV

EVAN PL

RAILY CT

DOVER GREEN

WAT

SON

AV

RICHE AV

HINTON ST

PEARSON ST

SLEEPY HOLLOW RD

LOMBARD CT

ROW PL

DOVER GREEN S

T

SHERILL AV

FOREST GRN

VANALLEN AV

FUTU

RITY PL

MONTEREY AV

OPP CT

TRYON AV

FOREST GREEN

CORELL AV

CRABBS LA

DEBR

A LO

OP

ENG

ERT ST

BENSON ST

COUNTRY LA

FELDMEYERS LA

POETS CIR

SHORELINE

GETZ AV

E DRUMGOOLE RD

MELVIN AV

4.16

.09

SCALE

0 4000 FEET2000

N

Future Land Use (2036)Figure 2-2FRESH KILLS PARK EAST PARK ROADS • SEIS

Fresh Kills Project Site Boundary

Study Area Boundary(1/2-Mile Perimeter)

Land to be Mappedas Public Place

Residential

Residential (withGround-Floor Retail)

Hotel

Commercial

Office

Entertainment

Industrial, Utilities, Transportaion, Public Parking

Institutional

Open Space

Vacant Parcels

Vacant Building

Under Construction

Fresh Kills Park

Fresh Kills Park