chapter 25 insider trading
DESCRIPTION
Chapter 25 Insider Trading. Insider trading basics What it is – classic / misappropriation Debate: pros and cons State law: ho-hum Majority rule: no fiduciary duty to shareholders “Special facts” rule Federal law: abstain or disclose Cady Roberts : fairness or equal access? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 16Public Shareholder Activism
Slide 1of 65 Fortune Magazine (Cover), “The Gray Art of Insider Trading” (Aug 13, 2013)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 2of 19
Chapter 25Insider Trading
• Insider trading basics– What it is – classic / misappropriation– Debate: pros and cons
• State law: ho-hum– Majority rule: no fiduciary duty to shareholders– “Special facts” rule
• Federal law: abstain or disclose– Cady Roberts: fairness or equal access?– Chiarella: duty of trust and confidence– Dirks: (1) tipper breach + (2) tippee knows– O’Hagan: misappropriator “defrauds source”
• Specific issues – SEC rules– Rule 10b5-2: duty of “trust and confidence” defined– Rule 10b5-1: “state of mind” defined / trading plans
• § 16: Disgorgement of short-swing trading profits
Module VIII – Stock Trading
Citizen of world
Citizen of world
Law profession
Law profession
Corporate practice
Corporate practice
Bar examBar
exam
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 3of 19
Insider trading primer
(in 30 minutes)
US Insider Trading
Story of Raja Rajaratnam• Curriculum vitae• Crime• Punishment
US law of “insider trading” • Duty to “source of information”• Breach of duty • Federal enforcement
Comparison to EU regulation• Definition: “inside information”• Categories of persons• Prohibition against “use”
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 4of 19
Story of Raj Rajaratnam
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 5of 19
Raj Rajaratnam
Personal
Born: June 15, 1957 (Sri Lanka)
Married: Asha Pabla (3 children)
Education
U Sussex / Engineering
MBA - Wharton / U Penn (1983)
Work experience
Loan officer: Chase Manhattan
Analyst --> President: Needham & Co.
Founder & CEO, Galleon Group
Director, Goldman Sachs
Investments
Personal net worth $1.8 B
Owns 50% of Sri Lankan stock market
Charity
$5 MM for 2004 Tsunami fund
$3.5 MM Tamils Rehabilitation (frozen)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 6of 19
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 7of 19
Guilty• 14 counts of insider
trading (conspiracy)• Age: 53 (married;
children 14-19)• 11 years in prison
(until July 2021)• $60 million in trading
gains• $150 million in civil
/criminal fines
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 8of 19
Some questions:
What is a hedge fund?
What was Raj’s crime?
How was he caught?
Why case brought as conspiracy?
Portfolio
Fund investors
Hedge fund[Galleon]
Public company
Public company
IBMIntel
Public company
Public company
Public company
McKinsey & Co
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 9of 19
US insider trading law
“Trading on basis of material,
non-public information”
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 10of 19
Classic Insider Trading
INSIDER
Company shareholders
Misappropriation(Outsider Trading)
Tippee Tippee
Trading violates “duty of trust/confidence”(Silence = fraud)Trading on tip is illegal when --
(1) Insider-tipper violates duty*(2) Tippee knows / reason to know
* improper benefit
Outside shareholders
Trading violates “duty to source”
Rule 10b5-2: Trading illegal when --• Confidentiality agreement• Confidentiality practice • Family member (functional)
Rule 10b5-1: specifies illegal state of mind when person trades “on the basis” of material, nonpublic information
• Person “aware” (“conscious knowledge”)• Not part of “pre-existing trading plan”
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 11of 19
Insider trading
Classic insider trading
Outsider trading(misappropriation)
Chiarella (US 1980)
Silence = fraud in face of “duty of trust or confidence”
Dirks (US 1982)
Illegal tipping = (1)tip breaches duty*
(2)know or reason to know*for personal benefit
O’Hagan (US 1996)
Misappropriation = fraud on source (duty)icw securities trading
Rule 10b5-2
Duty: agree confidentiality /business practice / family
Reg FD
Tell one analyst: tell public!
Securities fraudRule 10b-5:
Misstatements ofmaterial fact
Rule 10b5-1
Mind = awarenessPre-existing trading plan OK
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 12of 19
Purposes for Insider Trading Regulation
Provide“fairness”
Provide“fairness”
Assure mktintegrity
Assure mktintegrity
Reduce “cost of capital”
Reduce “cost of capital”
Protect“property”Protect“property”
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 13of 19
“Insider trading corrodes investor confidence. It undermines the integrity of the markets by tilting, unacceptably, the playing field in favor of those whose greed drives them to betray the duties and confidences they owe others.” Robert Khuzami
SEC enforcement director
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 14of 19
Sanctions for insider trading• Private enforcement
– Owner of information / traders– Trading gains /avoided losses– Private actions rarely brought
• SEC enforcement– Investigation (with NYSE)– Disgorgement of profits – Civil penalties (3X losses)
• Criminal enforcement– Department of Justice– Criminal fines (up to $5 MM)– Imprisonment (up to 20 years)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 15of 19
SEC Insider Trading Enforcement Actions
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 16of 19
EU insider trading law
“[Specified persons] prohibited from using inside information [precise +
when revealed significant price effect]”
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 17of 19
“Use of inside info”
PERSON
Securities of issuer
“Use of inside info”
Tippee Tippee
Art 2: Possesses inside infoby virtue mgmt or capital
(or criminal activities)
Art 4: Prohibition of Art 2 and 3applies to others who know“inside information”
Securities of other issuer
Art 2: Possesses inside infoby virtue of employ, prof, duties
Art 4: Prohibition of Art 2 and 3applies to others who know“inside information”
Art 2: prohibits use of “inside info” by acquiring Financial info to which inside info relates
Art 3: Tipping prohibited
Art 3: Tipping prohibited
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 18of 19
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 19of 19
Insider trading hypos
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 20of 19
End
Insider trading primer
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 21of 19
What is insider trading?
Good news, bad news
Outsider trading
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 22of 19
Insider trading
Corporation
Non-public, material information
Stock market
Insider
Buy from existing shareholders
Buy “call options” • option to buy stock at mkt (let’s say $25)• profit = new price (let’s say $35) less exercise price ($25)
Good news
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 23of 19
Insider trading
Corporation
Non-public, material information
Stock market
Insider
Sell to existing shareholders
Buy “put options” • option to sell stock at mkt (let’s say $25)• profit = exercise price ($25) minus new price (let’s say $15)
Bad news
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 24of 19
What is outsider trading …
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 25of 19
Outsider trading
Corporation
Non-public, material information(such as takeover plans by Corp)
Investors / shareholders
shareholders
Target Company
Good or bad news
Insider
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 26of 19
Good Thing Not a Good Thing
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 27of 19
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 28of 19
Evaluate insider trading
Pros
• Sends “soft information” to markets – thus protecting proprietary info
• Encourages insiders to own company stock
• Compensates insiders for developing “good news”
Cons
• Unfair to those without information
• Discourages investors from entering market
• Adds to trading “spreads” in markets
• Constitutes theft of corporate intellectual property
• Distorts company disclosures as insiders manipulate company info
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 29of 19
State law …
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 30of 19
Goodwin v. Agassiz (Mass 1933)
Corporation
Secured options to land (geologist’s theory - leads to mineral strike)
Stock market / Goodwin
Agassiz & McNaughton
Buy from existing shareholder (impersonal market)
Good news
Fraud (tort of deceit)• Material
misrepresentation• Intentional (Def
aware of truth)• Reliance (Pl relies
reasonably)• Misrepresentation is
cause of loss• Damages
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 31of 19
Goodwin v. Agassiz (Mass 1933)
Corporation
Secured options to land (geologist’s theory - leads to mineral strike)
Stock market / Goodwin
Agassiz & McNaughton
Buy from existing shareholder (impersonal market)
Good news
Fiduciary duty (to shareholders)
• Majority rule – no duty in impersonal markets
• “Special facts” –personal dealings on the basis of highly material facts
• “Strict / Kansas” rule – face-to-face transaction, not necessarily special facts
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 32of 19
"The contention that directors also
occupy a position of trustee toward individual stockholders in the corporation is plainly contrary to repeated decisions of this court [and other courts]"
"Purchase and sales of stock dealt in on the stock exchange are commonly impersonal affairs. An honest director would be in a difficult situation if he could neither buy nor sell on the stock exchange shares of stock in his corporation ..."
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts:
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 33of 19
Corporate recovery …
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 34of 19
Diamond v. Oreamuno (NY 1969)
“Bad news”Lower earnings
Investors / shareholders
Sell to new investors
Corporation
Non-public, material information(IBM puts squeeze on earnings)
Corporation
Non-public, material information(IBM puts squeeze on earnings)
Oreamuno / Gonzalez
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 35of 19
Corporate recovery
Arguments for:
• Distinguishes “good” companies from “bad” companies
• Agent can’t take from principal, even if principal not harmed
Arguments against:
• Recovery screwy:– Good news: Recovery
goes to non-trading Shs who held stock, not those who sold stock
– Bad news: Recovery goes to all Shs, does not fully compensate Shs who bought
• Possible multiple liability (see Rule 10b-5)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 36of 19
Federal law of insider trading(duty to abstain or disclose)
Theory under Rule 10b-5
Chiarella: duty of trust and confidence
Dirks: tipper-tippee liability
O’Hagan: misappropriation liability
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 37of 19
Section 10(b) / Rule 10b-5
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Act § 10
It shall be unlawful for any person ...
(b) To use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security ... any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe
Fraud (tort of deceit)• Material misrepresentation• Intentional (defendant
aware of truth)• Reliance (plaintiff relies
reasonably)• Misrepresentation is cause
of loss• Damages
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 38of 19
Is silence fraudulent?
Conventional wisdom:• Must disclose latent, not patent,
defects. • Fiduciaries (confidential
relationship) must give full disclosure
But:• Unequal access to information not
significant factor • Courts over time less likely to
require disclosure!!
Krawiec (UNC-CH) & Zeiler (Georgetown) – 2004(466 contract cases / 200 years)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 39of 19
Enter SEC …
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 40of 19
Cady Roberts (SEC 1961)“Bad news”
Curtiss-Wright
Non-public, material information(directors vote to cut dividends)
Investors / shareholders
Gintel (director)
Sell to new investors(sell short)
What is theory?
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 41of 19
Parity of information
We hold that Gintel’s conduct violated clause (3) [of Rule 10b-5] as a practice which operated as a fraud or deceit on the purchasers
If purchasers had available material information known by a selling insider, their investment judgment would be affected. Sales by an insider must await disclosure.
Gintel has been fined $3000 by the NYSE .. And the protection of investors will be served if Gintel is suspended from the NYSE for 20 days.
Chair WiIliam Cary(“race to bottom”)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 42of 19
Enter Supreme Court …
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 43of 19
Chiarella v. US (US 1980)
Acquiror Inc
Non-public, material info(takeover plans)
Shareholders
shareholders
Target Company
Pandick Press
Chiarella
Insider
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 44of 19
Duty
"... silence in connection with the purchase or sale of securities may operate as fraud actionable under § 10(b) ... But such liability is premised upon a duty to disclose arising from a relationship of trust and confidence between parties to a transaction.”
.... duty to disclose ... guarantees that corporate insiders, who have an obligation to place the shareholder's welfare before their own, will not benefit personally through fraudulent use of material, nonpublic information.
Justice Lewis Powell(corporate lawyer)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 45of 19
Tipping …
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 46of 19
Dirks v. SEC (US 1983)
Equity Funding
Non-public, material information(massive accounting fraud)
Investors / shareholders
Dirks
Secrist
Clients dump stock
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 47of 19
Duty, again
... a tippee assumes a fiduciary duty to the shareholders of a corporation not to trade on material nonpublic information only when the insider has breached his fiduciary duty to the shareholders by disclosing the information to the tippee and the tippee knows or should know that there has been a breach.
Whether the "tip" was a breach of the insider's fiduciary duty [depends on] whether ... the insider receives a direct or indirect personal benefit that will translate into future earnings.
Justice Lewis Powell(very influential)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 48of 19
Some hypos …
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 49of 19
Hypos
Equity Funding
Non-public, material information(massive accounting fraud)
Investors / shareholders
Secrist
#1
Spouse
#2
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 50of 19
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 51of 19
SEC v. Stewart (2003)
Imclone
Non-public, material information(FDA likely to disapprove drug)
Stock market
Martha Stewart
(at airport to Mx)
SamWachtal
(CEO)
#1
#2
#1#1
Faneuil(broker’s asst)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 52of 19
Outsider Trading (Misappropriation)
“Fraud on source”? “in connection with” trading?Rule 10b5-2: Fiduciary relationship
Rule 10b5-1: Insider awareness
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 53of 19
Section 10(b) / Rule 10b-5
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Act § 10
It shall be unlawful for any person ...
(b) To use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security ... any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 54of 19
Attorney O’Hagan’s indiscretions …
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 55of 19
US v. O’Hagan (US 1997)
Grand Met
Non-public, material info(plan to make tender offerto Pillsbury shareholders)
Shareholders
Shareholders
Pillsbury
Dorsey &Whitney
O’Hagan
Option sellers
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 56of 19
Duty to source
The "misappropriation theory" holds that a person commits fraud "in connection with" a securities transaction, and thereby violates § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, when he misappropriates confidential information for securities trading purposes, in breach of a duty owed to the source of the information. See Brief for United States 14.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg[civil rights lawyer]
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 57of 19
ICW trading
[The "in connection with the purchase or sale of [a] security"] element is satisfied because the fiduciary's fraud is consummated, not when the fiduciary gains the confidential information, but when, without disclosure to his principal, he uses the information to purchase or sell securities. The securities transaction and the breach of duty thus coincide.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg[civil rights lawyer]
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 58of 19
What is insider trading?
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 59of 19
“Insider trading”(in the United States)
– Classic insider trading: • Fraudulent silence under Section 10(b)• Duty of trust and confidence to “abstain or disclose”• Actionable silence in confidential relationships
– Tipping: • Tippee knows or should know that • Tipper breached duty for direct/indirect personal benefit• Necessary to extend prohibition
– Misappropriation (outsider trading):• Duty of trust and confidence to source • Fraud on source “in connection with” securities trading• Maintain integrity of securities markets
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 60of 19
SEC rules• Rule 10b5-1: state of mind when
trading “on the basis” of material, nonpublic information– “aware” (“conscious knowledge”)– Pre-existing trading plans OK
• Rule 10b5-2: duty to source in business/personal relations– Agree to maintain confidentiality– Practice of sharing known
confidences– Spouse, parent, child, sibling –
unless dysfunctional family
• Regulation FD: no special access for stock analysts
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 61of 19
Q&A: The In's and Out's of Insider Trading
The Wall Street Journal October 4, 2002
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 62of 19
Insider trading quiz
1. You work as CFO in Up-N-Rising, a bakery franchiser, that is opening high-end bakery shops throughout the country. The numbers have been good, until this month when you notice an internal report showing a 25% fall in royalties from pastry sales.
Question: You sell some of your stock. Insider trading?
1. Yes. This is classic insider trading.
• Only question is whether drop in pastry sales is “material”
• State of mind – use versus knowledge – resolved by Rule 10b5-1 (“aware”)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 63of 19
Insider trading quiz
2. You are outside counsel to Up-N-Rising. The CFO at Up-N-Rising calls you and tells you about this quarter’s 25% fall in pastry sales - resulting in a 15% drop in earnings . She asks whether the company should disclose this in a press release.
Question: You sell Up-N-Rising short. Insider trading?
2. Yes. You are temporary insider (see fn 14 - Dirks case) and owe a duty under 10b5-2.
• Drop in royalties is “material”
• Duty to source in business/ personal relation (Rule 10b5-2)
– Agree to maintain confidentiality
– Practice of sharing known confidences
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 64of 19
Insider trading quiz
3. You are a friend of Ralph, who you know is sales manager for Up-N-Rising. Ralph tells you that “something” is happening at the company and you might want to consider selling your Up-N-Rising holdings, if you have any. Ralph says no more. Question: You sell your Up-N-Rising stock? Insider trading?
3. Probably. You received a tip (duty to inquire).
• If “something” is material, nonpublic
• Elements of illegal tipping
– Breach of duty by tipper (personal benefit)
– Tippee knows or reason to know of violation
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 65of 19
Insider trading quiz
4. You are a member of a golf foursome. One of the foursome says, “I think something’s happening at Up-N-Rising. You’d probably do well to short it.” He says no more.
Question: You may no further inquiries and buy Up-N-Rising put options. Insider trading?
4. No. Probably no duty to inquire.
• Materiality: What does “something happening” mean?
• Awareness: – What are you aware of
with “something”?
– Who was the source of information?
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 66of 19
Insider trading quiz
Jeffrey Haas, a professor of securities law at New York Law School: “If not from a company insider, you’re probably stupid to just listen and trade on it” … “You don't have a duty to find out where it came from.“
Nancy Grunberg, former assistant director of SEC enforcement: "The SEC would want to know -- unless it was on a piece of paper that fell out of the sky -- whether you asked about the source of the information before you acted on it."
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 67of 19
Insider trading quiz
5. New scenario. You are the CFO of KK Donuts and have been cogitating on what to do with all the company’s extra cash. You talk with the company’s CEO and investment banker, who agree buying Up-N-Rising would be a good move. You begin to form a takeover team.
Question: You buy Up-N-Rising stock. Insider trading?
5. Yes – actually “outsider trading.” You cannot misappropriate your company’s info.
• “Material”• Duty to source• “Awareness”
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 68of 19
Insider trading quiz6. You are the spouse of the CFO of KK Donuts, who tells you that she will be out of town for the next few days. “We’re looking at buying Up-N-Rising.” You know that this is only going to complicate your life. You wish there were a silver lining.
Question: You buy Up-N-Rising stock. Insider trading?
6. Yes: both (1) tip and (2) duty
• Tipper personal benefit?– WSJ: “Prosecutors
have an easy time. Courts say it’s enough that person's reputation among colleagues enhanced for being good tipper.”
• Recipient had duty to source
– Rule 10b5-2: “duty” presumed in close family relations, unless no expectation of confidentiality
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 69of 19
Insider trading quiz
7. You are the head of strategic planning at KK Donuts. You are no fool. You figure that when KK Donuts announces it is acquiring Up-N-Rising, the stock prices of competitors of Up-N-Rising will likely fall. The Up-N-Rising acquisition is moving apace.
Question: You sell short the stock of Up-N-Rising’s competitors. Insider trading?
7. Well, maybe
• Clearly no duty to outside companies
• But perhaps duty to source?
– Current academic “state of art” issue
– What were source’s confidentiality expectations
– ECMH: trading in competitor affects target’s stock price
– Reach of insider trading prohibition?
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 70of 19
Insider trading quiz
8. You are an outside “public relations” consultant to KK Donuts. The company's CEO calls and tells you KK Donuts may be buying Up-N-Rising to expand into the high-end French bakery business. Given the current political climate, you are asked if this would be good for public relations. You have no confidentiality agreement.
Question: You buy Up-N-Rising stock. Insider trading?
8. Yes (probably)
Rule 10b5-2 • Defines duty to source• “Persons … have history,
pattern or practice of sharing confidential information … so recipient had reason to know communicator expected confidentiality.”
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 71of 19
Insider trading quiz
9. You are the founder KK Donuts. You hold about 40% of the company’s stock and want to diversify. Problem is if you sell, during this volatile expansion period, you will be accused of insider trading. You tell your broker to sell 1% every month over the next two years – reducing your KK position to 16%.
Question: You sell (under the plan) when you are aware of the Up-N-Rising deal. Insider trading?
What if you discontinue the plan?
9. Yes (if done right)
• Rule 10b5-1 (Martha Stewart defense)
– Pre-existing trading plan negates “awareness”
– Must show• Binding contract,
instruct another, written plan – when “unaware”
• Plan has specifics, formula, or disables
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 72of 19
Insider trading quiz
10. You are best friends with Karl Konners, founder and CEO of KK Donuts. You both use the same broker. This morning the broker called you and blurted, “Karl is selling. Karl is really selling.” You knew that KK Donuts was being investigated by the FDA over its products’ fat content. Question: You sell your KK Donuts holdings. Insider trading?
10. Yes (perhaps)
• Similar to facts of Martha Stewart – Imclone– Insiders selling -
“material” information?– Breach of duty by CEO
when “informed” broker– Sub-tippee knows or
should know
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 73of 19
Martha Stewart
The mere fact that insiders are selling, even heavily, isn't necessarily "material," or market-moving information (though nonpublic). But if it turns out that the sales truly are unique -- that the founders had never sold shares before, for example -- you may be courting trouble.
David M. Brodsky, head securities litigation,
Latham & Watkins, New York:
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 74of 19
Insider trading quiz
11. You are in a taxi on a rainy night in New York City. The driver stops to pick up two wet customers. “My gosh,” you think, “It’s Karl Konners, the head of KK Donuts.” Karl talks to his associate in animated whispers about the FDA dropping its fat-content investigation. “Great news for KK Donuts,” you tell yourself.
Question: You buy KK Donuts stock. Insider trading?
11. No.
• No breach of duty when KK talked to associate
• No duty of eavesdropper to source
– No misappropriation– No tipping
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 75of 19
Insider trading quiz
12. You are the head of investor relations of KK Donuts. You have been besieged by inquiries about rumors of an Up-N-Rising takeover. You talk to senior management and decide on a script: “KK Donuts is in preliminary talks with Up-N-Rising management.” And so on. You answer no questions.
Question: . You call three leading analysts of KK stock and read the script. Can you?
12. No
• Regulation FD (fair disclosure) – Addresses systematic
tipping to analysts and preferred analyst back-scratching
– Treated as form of insider trading
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 76of 19
Regulation FD (fair disclosure)
• “Advice” to market professionals of material nonpublic information– Intentional: simultaneous public disclosure– Unintentional: public disclosure within 24 hours– Applies to senior management, investor relations
• Exceptions:– Normal course of business– Government officials– Road shows when going public– Disclosure by foreign private issuers
• Enforcement only by SEC (no private action)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 77of 19
Insider trading quiz(answers)
1. Yes
2. Yes3. Yes (inquire)
4. No (probably not inquire)
5. Yes
6. Yes
7. Maybe8. Yes (probably)
9. No (if done right)
10. Yes (perhaps)
11. No
12. No
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 25Insider Trading
Slide 78of 19
The end