chapter 5eng.sut.ac.th/me/2014/document/machinedesign1/document/ch_5_slides_th.pdfsuranaree...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 5
Failures Resulting from Static Loading
Chapter 5
Failures Resulting from Static Loading
Asst. Prof. Dr. Supakit Rooppakhun
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Failures Resulting from Static Loading
Chapter Outline 5-1 Static Strength
5-2 Stress Concentration
5-3 Failure Theories
5-4 Maximum-Shear-Stress Theory for Ductile Materials
5-5 Distortion-Energy Theory for Ductile Materials
5-6 Coulomb-Mohr Theory for Ductile Materials
5-7 Failure of Ductile Materials Summary
5-8 Maximum-Normal-Stress Theory for Brittle Materials
5-9 Modifications of the Mohr Theory for Brittle Materials
5-10 Failure of Brittle Materials Summary
5-11 Selection of Failure Criteria
5-12 Introduction to Fracture Mechanics
5-13 Important Design Equations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
3
• A static load is a stationary force or couple applied to a member.
(unchanging- magnitude, point or applied point, direction)
• Failure can mean a part has separated into two or more pieces; has become permanently distorted, thus ruining its geometry; has had its reliability downgraded; or has had its function compromised, whatever the reason.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Failures
Failure of truck driveshaft spline due to
corrosion fatigue
4
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Example of Failures
Impact failure of a lawn-mower blade
driver hub
Failure of an overhead-pulley retaining
bolt on a weightlifting machine
brittle fracture initiated by stress
concentration
The fractures exhibit the classic 45
degree shear failure
5
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Static Strength
• Ideally, in designing any machine element, the engineer should have available the results of a great many strength tests of the particular material chosen.
• More often than not it is necessary to design using only published values of yield strength, ultimate strength, percentage reduction in area, and percentage elongation.
6
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Stress Concentration
• Stress concentration is a highly localized effect.
• Geometric (theoretical) stress-concentration factor for normal stress Kt and shear stress Kts is defined as
7
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
• There is no universal theory of failure for the general case ofmaterial properties and stress state. Instead, over the yearsseveral hypotheses have been formulated and tested, leading totoday’s accepted practices most designers do.
• The generally accepted theories are:
Ductile materials (yield criteria)
Maximum shear stress (MSS)
Distortion energy (DE)
Ductile Coulomb-Mohr (DCM)
Brittle materials (fracture criteria)
Maximum normal stress (MNS)
Brittle Coulomb-Mohr (BCM)
Modified Mohr (MM)
Failure Theories
True strain fracture
8
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Failure TheoriesTrue strain fracture
9
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Maximum-Shear-Stress Theory for Ductile Materials
• The maximum-shear-stress theory predicts that..
“yielding begins whenever the maximum shear stress in any element equals or exceeds the maximum shear stress in a tension test specimen of the same material when that specimen begins to yield”.
• The MSS theory is also referred to as the Tresca or Guest theory.
2 3 0
simple tension test
or
It can be modified to incorporate
a factor of safety, n by
or
10
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Maximum-Shear-Stress Theory for Ductile Materials
Assuming a plane stress problem with σA ≥ σB, there are three cases to consider
Case 1: σA ≥ σB ≥ 0. For this case, σ1 = σA and σ3 = 0. Equation (5–1)reduces to a yield condition of
Case 2: σA ≥ 0 ≥ σB . Here, σ1 = σA and σ3 = σB , and Eq. (5–1) becomes
Case 3: 0 ≥ σA ≥ σB . For this case, σ1 = 0 and σ3 = σB , and Eq. (5–1) gives
σ
Case 1:
AAA
Case 2:
Case 3:
11
Distortion-Energy Theory for Ductile Materials
• Originated from observation that ductile materials stressed hydrostatically (equal principal stresses) exhibited yield strengths greatly in excess of expected values.
• Theorizes that if strain energy is divided into hydrostatic volume changing energy and angular distortion energy, the yielding is primarily affected by the distortion energy.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
12
Distortion-Energy Theory for Ductile Materials
• The distortion-energy theory predicts that..
“yielding occurs when the distortion strain energy per unit volumereaches or exceeds the distortion strain energy per unit volume for yieldin simple tension or compression of the same material”.
• Deriving the Distortion Energy
Hydrostatic stress is average of principal stresses
Strain energy per unit volume,
Substituting Eq. (3–19) for principal strains into strain energy equation,
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
13
Distortion-Energy Theory for Ductile Materials
• Deriving the Distortion Energy
Strain energy for producing only volume change is obtained by substituting av for 1, 2, and 3
Substituting av from Eq. (a),
Obtain distortion energy by subtracting volume changing energy, Eq. (5–7), from total strain energy, Eq. (b)
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
14
Distortion-Energy Theory for Ductile Materials
• Deriving the Distortion Energy
Tension test specimen at yield has 1 = Sy and 2 = 3 = 0 Applying to Eq. (5–8), distortion energy for tension test specimen is
DE theory predicts failure when distortion energy, Eq. (5–8), exceeds distortion energy of tension test specimen, Eq. (5–9)
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
15
Left hand side is defined as von Mises stress or effective stress σ′ as
For plane stress simplifies to (principal stress A , B , 0)
Using xyz components of three-dimensional stress, the von Misesstress can be written as
for plane stress
Distortion-Energy Theory for Ductile Materials
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
(σz = xz = yz =0)
16
Distortion-Energy Theory for Ductile Materials
• Consider a case of pure shear τxy ,where for plane stress σx = σy = 0. For
yield
Thus, the shear yield strength predicted by the distortion energy theory is
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
*** The distortion-energy theory is also called• The von Mises / von Mises-Hencky theory
• The shear-energy theory
• The octahedral-shear-stress theory
3 1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
21
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Coulomb-Mohr Theory for Ductile Materials
• Not all materials have compressive strengths equal to their corresponding tensile values.
• The idea of Mohr is based on three “simple” tests: tension, compression, andshear, to yielding if the material can yield, or to rupture.
• The practical difficulties lies in the form of the failure envelope.
• A variation of Mohr’s theory, called the Coulomb-Mohr theory or the internal-friction theory, assumes that the boundary is straight.
22
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Coulomb-Mohr Theory for Ductile Materials
• For plane stress, when the two nonzero principal stresses are σA ≥ σB , we have a situation similar to the three cases given for the MSS theory
Case 1: σA ≥ σB ≥ 0.
For this case, σ1 = σA
and σ3 = 0. Equation
(5–22) reduces to a
failure condition of
Case 2: σA ≥ 0 ≥ σB . Here, σ1 = σA and
σ3 = σB , and Eq. (5–22) becomes
Case 3: 0 ≥ σA ≥ σB . For this case, σ1 = 0 and σ3 = σB , and Eq. (5–22) gives
σ
Case 1:
AAA
Case 2:
Case 3:
23
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Failure of Ductile Materials Summary
• Either the maximum-shear-stresstheory or the distortion-energytheory is acceptable for design andanalysis of materials that would failin a ductile manner.
• For design purposes the maximum-shear-stress theory is easy, quick touse, and conservative.
• If the problem is to learn why a partfailed, then the distortion-energytheory may be the best to use.
• For ductile materials with unequalyield strengths, Syt in tension and Syc
in compression, the Mohr theory isthe best available.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
31
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Maximum-Normal-Stress Theory for Brittle Materials
• The maximum-normal-stress (MNS) theory states that..
“failure occurs whenever one of the three principal stresses equals or exceeds the strength”.
• For a general stress state in the ordered form σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ σ3. This theory then predicts that failure occurs whenever
where Sut -ultimate tensile and Suc -ultimate compressive strengths,
given as positive quantities.
For the plane stress, with σA ≥ σB,
It can be converted to design equations
as:
32
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Modifications of the Mohr Theory for Brittle Materials
Brittle-Coulomb-Mohr
Modified Mohr
Case 1:
Case 2:
Case 3:
Case 1:
*Case 2:
Case 3:
Biaxial fracture data of gray cast iron with various
failure criteria
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
36
School of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering,
Suranaree University of Technology
Failure of Brittle Materials Summary
Brittle materials have true strain at fracture is 0.05 or less.
In the 1st quadrant the data appear on both sides and along the failure curves of maximum-normal-stress, Coulomb-Mohr, and modified Mohr. All failure curves are the same, and data fit well.
In the 4th quadrant the modified Mohr theory represents the data best.
In the 3rd quadrant the points A, B, C, and D are too few to make any suggestion concerning a fracture locus.
Experimental data point obtained from
test on cast iron
Selection of Failure Criteria
First determine ductile vs. brittle
For ductile
◦ MSS is conservative, often used for design where higher
reliability is desired
◦ DE is typical, often used for analysis where agreement with
experimental data is desired
◦ If tensile and compressive strengths differ, use Ductile
Coulomb-Mohr (DCM)
For brittle
◦ Mohr theory is best, but difficult to use
◦ Brittle Coulomb-Mohr (BCM) is very conservative in 4th
quadrant
◦ Modified Mohr (MM) is still slightly conservative in 4th
quadrant, but closer to typical
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Selection of Failure Criteria in Flowchart Form
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−21
Introduction to Fracture Mechanics
Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) analyzes crack growth
during service
Assumes cracks can exist before service begins, e.g. flaw,
inclusion, or defect
Attempts to model and predict the growth of a crack
Stress concentration approach is inadequate when notch
radius becomes extremely sharp, as in a crack, since stress
concentration factor approaches infinity
Ductile materials often can neglect effect of crack growth, since
local plastic deformation blunts sharp cracks
Relatively brittle materials, such as glass, hard steels, strong
aluminum alloys, and steel below the ductile-to-brittle
transition temperature, benefit from fracture mechanics
analysis
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Quasi-Static Fracture
Though brittle fracture seems instantaneous, it
actually takes time to feed the crack energy from the
stress field to the crack for propagation.
A static crack may be stable and not propagate.
Some level of loading can render a crack unstable,
causing it to propagate to fracture.
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Quasi-Static Fracture
Foundation work for fracture mechanics established by Griffith
in 1921
Considered infinite plate with an elliptical flaw
Maximum stress occurs at (±a, 0)
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−22
Quasi-Static Fracture
Crack growth occurs when energy release rate from applied
loading is greater than rate of energy for crack growth
Unstable crack growth occurs when rate of change of energy
release rate relative to crack length exceeds rate of change of
crack growth rate of energy
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Crack Modes and the Stress Intensity Factor
Three distinct modes of crack propagation
◦ Mode I: Opening crack mode, due to tensile stress field
◦ Mode II: Sliding mode, due to in-plane shear
◦ Mode III: Tearing mode, due to out-of-plane shear
Combination of modes possible
Opening crack mode is most common, and is focus of this text
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−23
Mode I Crack Model
Stress field on dx dy element at crack tip
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−24
Stress Intensity Factor
Common practice to define stress intensity factor
Incorporating KI, stress field equations are
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Stress Intensity Modification Factor
Stress intensity factor KI is a function of geometry, size, and
shape of the crack, and type of loading
For various load and geometric configurations, a stress
intensity modification factor b can be incorporated
Tables for b are available in the literature
Figures 5−25 to 5−30 present some common configurations
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Stress Intensity Modification Factor
Off-center crack in plate in
longitudinal tension
Solid curves are for crack tip
at A
Dashed curves are for tip at B
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−25
Stress Intensity Modification Factor
Plate loaded in
longitudinal tension
with crack at edge
For solid curve there
are no constraints to
bending
Dashed curve obtained
with bending
constraints added
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−26
Stress Intensity Modification Factor
Beams of rectangular
cross section having an
edge crack
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−27
Stress Intensity Modification Factor
Plate in tension containing circular hole with two
cracks
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−28
Stress Intensity Modification Factor
Cylinder loaded in axial tension having a radial crack of
depth a extending completely around the circumference
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−29
Stress Intensity Modification Factor
Cylinder subjected to
internal pressure p, having
a radial crack in the
longitudinal direction of
depth a
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−30
Fracture Toughness
Crack propagation initiates when the stress intensity
factor reaches a critical value, the critical stress
intensity factor KIc
KIc is a material property dependent on material,
crack mode, processing of material, temperature,
loading rate, and state of stress at crack site
Also know as fracture toughness of material
Fracture toughness for plane strain is normally lower
than for plain stress
KIc is typically defined as mode I, plane strain fracture
toughness
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Typical Values for KIc
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Brittle Fracture Factor of Safety
Brittle fracture should be considered as a failure
mode for
◦ Low-temperature operation, where ductile-to-
brittle transition temperature may be reached
◦ Materials with high ratio of Sy/Su, indicating little
ability to absorb energy in plastic region
A factor of safety for brittle fracture
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 5−6
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 5−6 (continued)
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Fig. 5−25
Answer
Example 5−6 (continued)
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 5−7
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Answer
Example 5−7 (continued)
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design
Example 5−7 (continued)
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering DesignFig. 5−26
Example 5−7 (continued)
Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design