chapter 6 reasonably available control technology (ract) analysis · 2016-09-28 · x control of...

37
DRAFT – APRIL 2016 2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-1 CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS 6.1 Introduction On DATE, 2016, EPA published a final rule finding that Colorado’s marginal ozone nonattainment area (Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Fort Collins-Loveland) failed to attain the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the applicable marginal attainment deadline of July 20, 2015. Therefore, EPA reclassified Colorado’s ozone nonattainment area as moderate, requiring attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS no later than July 20, 2018, as demonstrated by the 2015-2017 ozone seasons 1 . Due to the reclassification, Colorado must submit a revised State Implementation Plan (SIP) that addresses the Clean Air Act’s (CAA) moderate nonattainment area requirements, as described in the final SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. These requirements include Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) and Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) analyses. EPA defines RACT as the lowest emissions limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility. Because a RACT analysis takes into account the technological and economic impacts of controls, the analysis and determination may differ from source to source and location to location. Under 40 CFR § 51.1112 2 and the reclassification 3 , Colorado’s SIP revision must provide for implementation of RACT as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than January 1, 2017, for categories of volatile organic compound (VOC) emission sources covered by an EPA Control Technique Guideline (CTG) and other major stationary sources of VOCs or nitrogen oxides (NOx) located in the nonattainment area. The VOC and NOx major stationary source thresholds for moderate nonattainment areas are the potential to emit 100 tons per year (tpy) or more. This RACT analysis evaluates potential emission control options for source categories subject to a final CTG 4 and major sources of VOC or NOx in Colorado’s ozone nonattainment area. Colorado reviewed the CTGs and compared them to Colorado’s point source inventory and existing rules. Colorado also reviewed EPA’s Alternative Control Techniques (ACT), EPA’s Reasonable Available Control Technology, Best Available Control Technology, Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Clearinghouse (RBLC), EPA’s Menu of Control Measures (4/2/2010), federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), federal National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), and regulations applicable in other states’ ozone nonattainment areas for potential emission control measures. Any identified potential control measures or strategies were further evaluated to determine whether the measures were reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility, and whether the measures could be implemented by January 1, 2017. Colorado similarly evaluated Colorado’s major VOC or NOx sources in the nonattainment area against the CTGs, ACT, RBLC, Menu of Control Measures, NSPS, and NESHAP for potential additional control measures. 1 NRDC v. EPA, 777 F.3d 456, 464-469 (D.C. Cir. 2014). 2 Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements; Final rule March 6, 2015, 80 Fed. Reg 12264 at 12280, 12282, and 12316. 3 Determinations of Attainment by the Attainment Date, Extensions of the Attainment Date, and Reclassification of Several Areas Classified as Marginal for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard; Proposed August 27, 2015, 80 Fed. Reg 51992 at 51998-51999. 4 EPA published a draft CTG in 2015 to reduce VOC emissions from the oil and gas industry. Colorado regulations contain requirements for the oil and gas industry that achieve equivalent or greater emission reductions. However, Colorado is not presently submitting a RACT analysis for this source category because EPA has not published the final CTG. Colorado will address the oil and gas CTG within the time frame specified in the final CTG.

Upload: others

Post on 11-Apr-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-1

CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS

1 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS 2 AIR QUA LITY M ONIT ORING, DATA, AND TRENDS 3 2011 EMISSIONS INVE NTORIES 4 2017 EMISSIONS INVE NTORY A ND REASONA BLE FURTHER PR OGRESS (RFP)DEMONS TRATION 5 PHOT OCHEMIICA L MODLEING A ND ATTAINME NT DEM ONSTRAT ION 6 NOX AND V OC REAS ONA BLY AVAILA BLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT)

6.1 Introduction On DATE, 2016, EPA published a final rule finding that Colorado’s marginal ozone nonattainment area (Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Fort Collins-Loveland) failed to attain the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the applicable marginal attainment deadline of July 20, 2015. Therefore, EPA reclassified Colorado’s ozone nonattainment area as moderate, requiring attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS no later than July 20, 2018, as demonstrated by the 2015-2017 ozone seasons1. Due to the reclassification, Colorado must submit a revised State Implementation Plan (SIP) that addresses the Clean Air Act’s (CAA) moderate nonattainment area requirements, as described in the final SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. These requirements include Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) and Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) analyses. EPA defines RACT as the lowest emissions limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility. Because a RACT analysis takes into account the technological and economic impacts of controls, the analysis and determination may differ from source to source and location to location. Under 40 CFR § 51.11122 and the reclassification3, Colorado’s SIP revision must provide for implementation of RACT as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than January 1, 2017, for categories of volatile organic compound (VOC) emission sources covered by an EPA Control Technique Guideline (CTG) and other major stationary sources of VOCs or nitrogen oxides (NOx) located in the nonattainment area. The VOC and NOx major stationary source thresholds for moderate nonattainment areas are the potential to emit 100 tons per year (tpy) or more. This RACT analysis evaluates potential emission control options for source categories subject to a final CTG4 and major sources of VOC or NOx in Colorado’s ozone nonattainment area. Colorado reviewed the CTGs and compared them to Colorado’s point source inventory and existing rules. Colorado also reviewed EPA’s Alternative Control Techniques (ACT), EPA’s Reasonable Available Control Technology, Best Available Control Technology, Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Clearinghouse (RBLC), EPA’s Menu of Control Measures (4/2/2010), federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), federal National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), and regulations applicable in other states’ ozone nonattainment areas for potential emission control measures. Any identified potential control measures or strategies were further evaluated to determine whether the measures were reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility, and whether the measures could be implemented by January 1, 2017. Colorado similarly evaluated Colorado’s major VOC or NOx sources in the nonattainment area against the CTGs, ACT, RBLC, Menu of Control Measures, NSPS, and NESHAP for potential additional control measures.

1 NRDC v. EPA, 777 F.3d 456, 464-469 (D.C. Cir. 2014). 2 Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements; Final rule March 6, 2015, 80 Fed. Reg 12264 at 12280, 12282, and 12316. 3 Determinations of Attainment by the Attainment Date, Extensions of the Attainment Date, and Reclassification of Several Areas Classified as Marginal for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard; Proposed August 27, 2015, 80 Fed. Reg 51992 at 51998-51999. 4 EPA published a draft CTG in 2015 to reduce VOC emissions from the oil and gas industry. Colorado regulations contain requirements for the oil and gas industry that achieve equivalent or greater emission reductions. However, Colorado is not presently submitting a RACT analysis for this source category because EPA has not published the final CTG. Colorado will address the oil and gas CTG within the time frame specified in the final CTG.

Page 2: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-2

6.2 VOC Source Categories Analysis Colorado reviewed the CTGs and compared them to Colorado’s existing rules and Colorado’s point source inventory to determine whether all CTG VOC emission source categories were subject to requirements that meet or exceed the applicable RACT requirements, or whether further emission controls or requirements were economically or technologically feasible or implementable by January 1, 2017. Colorado identified: (a) the VOC source categories for which Colorado does not have subject sources, supported by Appendix 6-A; (b) the VOC source categories for which Colorado has subject sources and general and source specific RACT requirements, supported by Appendix 6-B; (c) the VOC source categories for which Colorado has subject sources and has general but not source specific RACT requirements, supported by Appendices 6-C(a)-(e); and (d) other ACT VOC source categories for which there is not a corresponding CTG or Colorado source specific RACT requirements, supported by Appendix 6-D. Colorado also reviewed the ACTs, RBLC, EPA’s Menu of Control Measures, and regulations applicable to states with the same or more stringent ozone nonattainment areas5 for other potentially economically and technologically feasible control technologies. EPA has issued forty-four CTGs that recommend a particular level of control as being RACT. Colorado determined that Colorado does not have sources in some CTG VOC source categories, so a negative declaration satisfies Colorado’s RACT obligations. Colorado determined that Colorado has sources in CTG VOC source categories and has adequate general and source specific RACT requirements in Colorado Regulation 7. And, Colorado determined that Colorado has sources in CTG VOC source categories and has general but not source specific RACT regulatory requirements. EPA has also issued twenty ACTs for sixteen categories of VOC emission sources, which do not recommend a particular emission level or control as being RACT. ACTs describe alternative controls a state may consider when developing RACT. The existence of an ACT for a source category does not trigger a requirement for states to develop or submit a RACT analysis. Of these ACTs, four are addressed by CTGs, three are addressed by federal consumer product rules, four are addressed by federal NSPS or NESHAP, and one concerns agricultural pesticides, which is not regulated by the Division. Colorado evaluated the remaining four ACT VOC source categories for which EPA has not issued a CTG and Colorado does not have source specific RACT requirements. EPA has also issued ten ACTs for nine categories of NOx emission sources, which are addressed by federal NSPS or NESHAP, as summarized in Appendix 6-E. Colorado did not further analyze these ACTs for purposes of this RACT analysis because the RACT analysis relates to VOC source categories. 6.2.1 Negative Declaration Colorado does not have sources in the following CTG VOC source categories, summarized in Appendix 6-A – CTGs – No Subject Colorado Sources.

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources – Volume II: Surface Coating of Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks (EPA 1977) and Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings (EPA 2007) and Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings (EPA 2008)

5 California Air Districts: South Coast, San Francisco Bay Area, San Joaquin Valley, Sacramento, and Ventura; Texas ozone nonattainment areas: Dallas-Fort Worth, Northeast Texas, Beaumont-Port Arthur, Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, Victoria, Corpus Christi, Austin-Round Rock, San Antonio, and El Paso; and Arizona Maricopa County. Note; some of these are serious or extreme ozone nonattainment areas.

Page 3: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-3

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources – Volume IV: Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire (EPA 1977)

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources – Volume V: Surface Coating of Large Appliances (EPA 1977) and Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings (EPA 2007)

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources – Volume VII: Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling (EPA 1978 ) and Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings (EPA 2006)

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires (EPA 1978)

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources – Volume VIII: Graphic Arts-Rotogravure and Flexography (EPA 1978)

Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners (EPA 1982)

Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins (EPA 1983)

Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment (EPA 1984)

Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (EPA 1984)

Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (EPA 1993)

Alternative Control Technology Document – Surface Coating Operations at Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Facilities (EPA 1994 ) and Control Techniques Guidelines for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations (Surface Coating) (EPA 1996)

Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing (EPA 2006) Control Techniques for Miscellaneous Plastic Parts Coatings (EPA 2008) Control Techniques Guideline for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials (EPA 2008) Control Technique Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives (EPA 2008)

Not having subject sources, Colorado conducted no further analyses of these VOC source categories. 6.2.2 Colorado Source Specific Regulation of CTG VOC Source Categories Colorado has sources in the following CTG VOC source categories. Colorado has adopted RACT requirements the same as or similar to the CTGs into Colorado’s ozone SIP in Colorado’s Regulation 7, Control of Ozone Via Ozone Precursors and Control of Hydrocarbons Via Oil and Gas Emissions, last approved by EPA in 2011 (August 5, 2011, 76 Fed. Reg. 47443). These CTGs are listed below, and summarized in Appendix 6-B – CTGs Colorado Has Adopted.

Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems – Gasoline Service Stations (EPA 1975) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources – Volume II: Surface

Coating of Cans, Coils (EPA 1977) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning (EPA 1977) Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit

Turnarounds (EPA 1977) Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals (EPA 1977) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources – Volume III: Surface

Page 4: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-4

Coating of Metal Furniture (EPA 1977) and Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings (EPA 2007)

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Bulk Gasoline Plants (EPA 1977) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks

(EPA 1977) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Use of Cutback Asphalt (EPA 1977) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources – Volume VI: Surface

Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products (EPA 1978) and Control Techniques for Miscellaneous Metal Parts Coatings (EPA 2008)

Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical

Products (EPA 1978) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating

Roof Tanks (EPA 1978) Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor

Collection Systems (EPA 1978) Control of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline

Processing Plants (EPA 1983) Colorado further analyzed each CTG in comparison to the respective Regulation 7 provisions to determine whether the provisions still meet the RACT obligation. Colorado also considered control strategies described in the RBLC, EPA’s Menu of Control Measures, and in other states’ ozone nonattainment areas. EPA’s RBLC contains case-specific information on the “best available” air pollution technologies that have been required to reduce the emission of air pollutants from stationary sources, as provided by state and local permitting agencies. The RBLC was designed to help permit applicants and permit reviewers make pollution prevention and control technology decisions for stationary air pollution sources. The RBLC is searchable by facility state, company or facility name, pollutant, and process information, some of which relate to CTG VOC source categories. EPA’s Menu of Control Measures was developed to provide information to assist the identification and evaluation of potential control measures. The Menu of Control Measures notes that measures that are effective and cost-effective will vary by area due to the nature of and sources contributing to ozone issues in that area and that the costs of applying a control measure will also have case-specific considerations. Colorado considered the CTGs and these lists of control measures and determined that Colorado’s Regulation 7 requirements are similar to the measures described. As detailed in Appendix 6-B, Colorado also found that Regulation 7 is similar to ozone nonattainment area regulations adopted by other states for pharmaceutical manufacturing, cutback asphalt, solvent metal cleaning, gasoline service stations, gasoline tank trucks, fixed and floating roof tanks, petroleum refineries, and natural gas processing plants. Colorado found regulations in other states that differ slightly from Regulation 7 for metal furniture surface coating VOC limits, miscellaneous metal parts coating VOC limits, can and coil coating VOC limits, inspection frequencies for gasoline loading and bulk terminals, and control efficiency for refinery vapory recovery systems. Colorado does not consider these differences to be material. Further, Colorado found that federal NSPS and NESHAP standards apply to many CTG VOC source categories.

Page 5: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-5

Colorado determined that the existing provisions in Regulation 7 are still adequate and therefore RACT for all CTG VOC source categories identified in Appendix 6-B because: (1) Regulation 7 RACT for these CTG VOC source categories is consistent with controls or requirements recommended in the CTG and controls or requirements implemented in other nonattainment areas; (2) the CTG VOC source categories are regulated by federal NSPS and/or NESHAP; and/or (3) the cost for advancing a small additional increment of reduction is not reasonable, or implementable by January 1, 2017. In the course of this review, Colorado found control strategies for some VOC source categories that are not addressed by a CTG or ACT. No additional RACT analysis is necessary for these source categories, but Colorado may consider them at a later date for potential future ozone reduction requirements. 6.2.3 No Colorado Source Specific Regulation of CTG VOC Source Categories Colorado has sources in the following CTG VOC source categories for which Colorado’s regulations contain general but not source specific RACT provisions, as summarized in Appendices 6-C(a)-(e).

Aerospace (EPA 1994, 1997) Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing

Operations (EPA 1996) Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing (EPA

2006) Control Techniques Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning Solvents (EPA 2006) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Systems (EPA

1978) In analyzing each of these source categories, Colorado considered control strategies described in the CTGs, ACTs, RBLC, EPA’s Menu of Control Measures, other ozone nonattainment areas, Colorado regulation, and current industry practices. 6.2.3.1 Aerospace Concerning aerospace, the CTG recommends specialty coating VOC contents of 60-1,230 g/L, application methods for primer and topcoats such as high volume low pressure spraying, and work practices for solvent cleaning such as closed containers, spill minimization, and hand-wipe cleaning with aqueous or VOC composite vapor pressure less than 45 mm Hg. While most regulations adopted by other states establish similar work practices, application methods, and VOC content limits, some states require emission control percentages and different VOC content limits. Colorado Regulation 7 establishes similar requirements that apply to Colorado’s aerospace manufacturing sources: coating VOC limits of 3.0 to 4.3 lb/gal6; the use of high volume low pressure spray guns to minimize VOC emissions; solvent degreasing and cleaning requirements7; a prohibition of disposal of VOC by evaporation or spillage unless RACT is utilized8; and control techniques and work practices to reduce VOC emissions from fugitive sources such as, but not limited to, tight-fitting covers for open tanks, covered containers for solvent wiping cloths, and proper disposal of dirty cleanup solvent.9 Thus, Colorado’s general and other source specific RACT requirements are similar to the aerospace CTG.

6 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation 7 Section IX.L.2.a.(ii); 3.0 to 4.3 lb/gal equates to 359 to 515 g/l. 7 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation 7 Section X. 8 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation 7 Section V.A. 9 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation 7 Section IX.A.7.

Page 6: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-6

6.2.3.2 Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations Concerning wood furniture manufacturing, the CTG recommends coating VOC content limits of 0.8-2.3 kg VOC/kg solids and work practice standards such as closed containers and spray equipment maintenance for sources that emit or have the potential to emit equal to or greater than 25 tons per year of VOCs. While other states’ regulations establish similar VOC content limits, application methods, and work practices, some states require other VOC content limits and emission control percentages. Colorado Regulation 710 prohibits the disposal of VOC by evaporation or spillage unless RACT is utilized and requires all surface coating operations use control techniques and work practices to reduce VOC emissions from fugitive sources11 such as, but not limited to, tight-fitting covers for open tanks, covered containers for solvent wiping cloths, and proper disposal of dirty cleanup solvent. Colorado only has one wood furniture manufacturing operation that exceeds the CTG applicability threshold and that source is a major source, thus subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJ (National Emission Standards for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations). Combined, Colorado’s general RACT requirements and the applicable NESHAP are similar to the wood furniture manufacturing CTG.

6.2.3.3 Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing Concerning lithographic printing, the CTG recommends 95% control of VOCs from heatset dryers or outlet concentration of 20 ppmv for heatset offset lithographic printing presses with the potential to emit at least 25 tpy VOC. The CTG recommends fountain solution for heatset web offset lithographic printing of 1.6 percent alcohol, and 5 percent alcohol for sheet-fed and coldset web printing with the potential to emit equal to or greater than 15 lb/day VOC. The CTG recommends cleaning materials with a VOC composite vapor pressure less than 10 mm Hg or containing less than 70 weight percent VOC and work practices such as closed containers for facilities with the potential to emit equal to or greater than 15 lb/day VOC. While other states’ regulations establish similar VOC content limits and emission control percentages, some states require alternative VOC content limits or emission control percentages. Concerning Colorado’s lithographic printing facilities, Colorado Regulation 7 prohibits the disposal of VOC by evaporation or spillage unless RACT is utilized12, generally closed containers and proper disposal practices. In addition, market forces have driven lithographic printers to use low or no-VOC inks and solutions, which reduce both financial and environmental costs.13 Combined, Colorado’s general RACT requirements and market forces are affecting VOC emission reductions, such that any additional reductions would be insignificant. Further, Colorado and Colorado’s lithographic printing sources are unable to implement additional regulatory RACT requirements by January 1, 2017. However, Colorado continues to analyze these strategies for implementation after January 1, 2017. 6.2.3.4 Industrial Cleaning Solvents Concerning industrial cleaning solvents used at facilities emitting VOC greater than 15 lb/day, the CTG recommends an organic solvent VOC content of 0.42 lb/gal or emission control of 85% and work practice standards including covered containers, proper disposal, and equipment practices. EPA

10 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation 7 Section V.A. 11 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation 7 Section IX.A.7. 12 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation 7 Section V.A. 13 Printers’ National Environmental Assistance Center (PNEAC): Cleaner Technology Substitutes Assessment: Lithographic Blanket Washes; Vegetable Ester Blanket Washes; Digital Pre-press Reduces Waste; Alcohol Free Printing; Pollution Prevention: Fountain Solution Solutions; Pollution Prevention: Printing Inks; How to Reduce, Reuse and Recycle Lithographic Ink Wastes. http://www.pneac.org/sheets/PrintingSector.cfm?PrintingSector=4

Page 7: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-7

intended the CTG to apply to industrial cleaning operations in the nine following cleaning categories: spray gun cleaning; spray booth cleaning; large manufactured parts cleaning; equipment cleaning; floor cleaning; line cleaning; parts cleaning; tank cleaning; and small manufactured parts cleaning. While other states’ regulations also establish similar work practices, control requirements, and cleaning solvent VOC content, some states require different VOC content limits, higher emission control, and airless cleaning systems. Concerning industrial cleaning solvent use in Colorado, Colorado Regulation 7 prohibits the disposal of VOC by evaporation or spillage unless RACT is utilized14, generally closed containers and proper disposal practices. In addition, Colorado has found that industry practice has increasingly used services such as Safety-Kleen for parts cleaning and waste management as well as low VOC solvents due to solvent manufacturing trends and supply, which reduce both financial and environmental costs. For example, Safety-Kleen’s heavy-duty hand wipes, spray and wipe cleaner degreaser, and heavy-duty cleaner degreaser all have VOC content less than 0.25 lb/gal. Combined, Colorado’s general RACT requirements and market forces are affecting VOC emission reductions, such that any additional reductions would be insignificant. Further, Colorado and Colorado’s industrial cleaning operations are unable to implement additional regulatory RACT requirements by January 1, 2017. However, Colorado continues to analyze these strategies for implementation after January 1, 2017. 6.2.3.5 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Systems Concerning perchloroethylene dry cleaning, the CTG is no longer relevant because perchloroethylene has been exempted from the definition of VOC. Regardless, the federal NESHAP, 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart M (National Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities), achieves VOC control with refrigerated condensers and carbon adsorbers, leak inspection and repair, and work practices such as filter drainage, closed containers, and proper waste disposal. While other states’ regulations require compliance with Subpart M, some states prohibit perchloroethylene dry cleaning system. The Division implements and enforces Subpart M; thus, Colorado is implementing RACT for perchloroethylene dry cleaning systems. Colorado determined that Colorado’s existing requirements for these CTG VOC source categories are consistent with the CTGs and satisfy RACT. In the case of lithographic printing and industrial cleaning solvents, industry practice and market forces have achieved additional VOC reductions, such that VOC control is similar to reductions achieved through the CTGs. Colorado evaluated including additional regulatory RACT requirements consistent with current practices for these industries and determined that potential additional emission reductions were minimal. Further, Colorado determined that implementation of such additional regulatory measures could not occur by January 1, 2017. Colorado statute15 requires the Division to engage participants with an interest in the subject of a potential rule. While the participant engagement does not necessarily have to occur prior to the formal rule-making process, the Division considers it particularly necessary when engaging with an industry not previously regulated, such as offset lithographic printing or industrial cleaning operations. In addition, Colorado’s rule-making process establishes at least a three month timeframe between a request for hearing before the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (Commission) and hearing before the Commission to allow for party and public participation in the rule development. And prior to submission to EPA, the Colorado legislature must review Colorado SIPs and SIP revisions, which only occurs January through May.

14 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation 7 Section V.A. 15 Colorado Revised Statute Section 24-4-103.

Page 8: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-8

Therefore, due to the time needed to engage participants, for the rule-making process, for legislative review, and for a source to implement any new requirements established through the rule-making process, sources potentially subject to the CTG source categories listed are unable to implement additional RACT by January 1, 2017, as required by 40 CFR Part 51, Section 51.1112(a)(3) and Colorado’s reclassification. 6.2.4 Non-CTG VOC Source Categories addressed by ACTs Of the ACT VOC source categories, four are not addressed by a CTG, federal consumer product rule, or federal NSPS or NESHAP. Colorado’s regulations do not contain source specific RACT provisions for these source categories, as summarized in Appendix 6-D.

Alternative Control Technology Document – Organic Waste Process Vents (EPA 1990) Alternative Control Technology Document – Bakery Ovens (EPA 1992) Industrial Wastewater Alternative Control Technology (EPA 1994 (1992 draft CTG, later

issued as ACT)) Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Batch Processes (EPA 1994)

In analyzing these sources, Colorado considered control strategies described in the ACTs, RBLC, EPA’s Menu of Control Measures, and in other ozone nonattainment areas. 6.2.4.1 Organic Waste Process Vents Concerning organic waste process vents, the ACT discusses controlling VOC emissions with vapor recovery control devices and combustion control devices from process vents. The ACT addresses process vents on waste management units (i.e., distillation and stripping operations) at treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDF) treating wastes with total organics concentrations of less than 10 ppmv and treatment units part of a waste management system exempt from Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permitting. Due to facility variability, the ACT recommends that the choice of control technology be made on the basis of costs and cost effectiveness, thus on a case-by-case basis. 6.2.4.2 Bakery Ovens Concerning bakery ovens, the ACT discusses controlling VOC emissions with combustion control devices. The ACT addresses ovens at large bakeries producing yeast-leavened bread, rolls, buns, and other similar products (e.g., bread production 6,000 to 29,000 tpy, VOC emissions 13 to 100 tpy). The ACT suggests analyzing potential emission control options for bakeries by identifying the cost effectiveness of controls for each oven and comparing to other facilities to determine the appropriate cost effective value, thus on a case-by-case basis. Other state requirements establish different emission control percentages.

6.2.4.3 Industrial Wastewater

Concerning industrial wastewater, the ACT discusses controlling VOC emissions through waste minimization and water treatment. The ACT addresses the collection and treatment of industrial wastewater from: the organic chemicals, plastics, and synthetic fibers industry; the pesticides manufacturing industry; the pharmaceuticals manufacturing industry; and the hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities industry. EPA intended the ACT/CTG wastewater collection and treatment control to be consistent with the subsequently published Hazardous Organic NESHAP at

Page 9: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-9

40 CFR Part 63, Subparts F, G, H, and I (HON) (59 FR 19402, April 22, 1994). While addressing HAP rather than just VOC, the HON wastewater provisions are recommended as the model wastewater rule. Other state requirements include cover and inspection requirements. The Division implements and enforces the HON. 6.2.4.4 Batch Processes Concerning batch processes, the ACT discusses reducing emissions from reactors, filters, dryers, distillation columns, extractors, crystallizers, and storage and transfer devices with condensers, scrubbers, carbon adsorbers, thermal incinerators, vapor containment systems, and operational practices. The ACT addresses batch processes in six industries: plastic materials and resins; pharmaceuticals; gum and wood chemicals; cyclic crudes and intermediates; industrial organic chemicals; and agricultural chemicals. Other state requirements establish specific control percentages. Colorado Regulation 7 establishes work practice requirements similar to the ACTs and prohibits the disposal of VOC by evaporation or spillage unless RACT is utilized, generally closed containers and proper disposal practices. ACTs describe alternative controls states may consider when developing RACT but do not recommend a particular level or control as being RACT. Further, these ACT VOC source categories are not also CTG VOC source categories16. Therefore, while Colorado evaluated these ACTs, Colorado is not required under 40 CFR Section 51.1112 to make RACT conclusions for these source categories. However, Colorado may continue to analyze these strategies for implementation at a later date. 6.3 Major Source Analysis Moderate ozone nonattainment areas must implement RACT for major stationary sources of VOCs or NOx in the nonattainment area. The VOC and NOx major stationary source thresholds for moderate nonattainment areas are the potential to emit 100 tons per year (tpy) or more. As with RACT for the CTG VOC source categories, RACT is the lowest emissions limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility. Similarly, RACT for major sources must be implemented as expeditiously as practicable but no later than January 1, 2017. Colorado reviewed Colorado’s point source inventory to verify that major sources of VOC or NOx emissions in the nonattainment area are subject to requirements that meet or exceed RACT, or whether further emission controls on the sources were economically or technologically feasible or implementable by January 1, 2017. Colorado reviewed Colorado’s point source inventory and found 46 major VOC or NOx stationary sources in the nonattainment area. Colorado reviewed the sources’ operating permits and consulted with knowledgeable staff of the Division’s permit and enforcement programs. Colorado also considered control strategies in the CTGs, ACTs, RBLC, EPA’s Menu of Control Measures, NSPS, NESHAP, and Colorado regulation. EPA’s RBLC contains case-specific information on the “best available” air pollution technologies that

16 40 CFR § 51.1112(a)(1) For each nonattainment area classified Moderate or higher, the state shall submit a SIP revision that meets the VOC and NOx RACT requirements in CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f). CAA § 182(b)(2) The State shall …include provisions … with respect to each of the following: (A) Each category of VOC sources in the area covered by a CTG document issued by the Administrator between November 15, 1990, and the date of attainment. (B) All VOC sources in the area covered by any CTG issued before November 15, 1990.

Page 10: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAFT – APRIL 2016

2017 Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard SIP Page 6-10

have been required to reduce the emission of air pollutants from stationary sources, as provided by state and local permitting agencies. EPA’s Menu of Control Measures was developed to provide information to assist the identification and evaluation of potential control measures. Colorado considered these lists of control measures and determined that Colorado’s major sources are subject to requirements similar to measures described. Colorado determined that either RACT has been determined for these sources (i.e., NSPS or NESHAP/MACT applicability, Regulation 7 RACT requirements, or BACT analyses) or that the sources are unable to implement additional control strategies by January 1, 2017, due to the time required for rule-making, permitting17, and/or source implementation, as described above. For the sources where additional, potentially feasible emission control or reduction measures cannot be implemented by January 1, 2017, Colorado continues to analyze these strategies for implementation after January 1, 2017, as noted in Appendix 6-F.

17 Operating permit application completeness determination – 60 days, operating permit or major modification application processing – 18 months, minor operating permit modification processing – 90 days. Colorado Regulation 3, Part C, Sections IV.B. IV.C., X.H.

Page 11: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-11

Appe

ndix

6-A

– C

TGs –

No

Subj

ect C

olor

ado

Sour

ces

Date

of C

TG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do ru

le

Date

of

Colo

rado

ad

optio

n

Date

of

mos

t re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Reg

ulat

ion

7 19

77

(ACT

19

94)

Cont

rol o

f Vol

atile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns fr

om E

xist

ing

Stat

iona

ry S

ourc

es –

Vol

ume

II: S

urfa

ce

Coat

ing

of P

aper

, Fab

rics,

Aut

omob

iles,

and

Lig

ht-D

uty

Truc

ks

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V. a

nd IX

.

12/1

4/19

78 a

nd

5/22

/198

0 8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

2007

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues G

uide

lines

for P

aper

, Film

, and

Foi

l Coa

tings

Re

gula

tion

7 Se

ctio

ns V

. and

IX.

12

/14/

1978

and

5/

22/1

980

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

2008

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues G

uide

lines

for A

utom

obile

and

Lig

ht-D

uty

Truc

k As

sem

bly

Coat

ings

Re

gula

tion

7 Se

ctio

ns V

. and

IX.

12

/14/

1978

and

5/

22/1

980

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

1977

Co

ntro

l of V

olat

ile O

rgan

ic E

miss

ions

from

Exi

stin

g St

atio

nary

Sou

rces

– V

olum

e IV

: Sur

face

Co

atin

g of

Insu

latio

n of

Mag

net W

ire

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V. a

nd IX

. 12

/14/

1978

and

5/

22/1

980

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

1977

Co

ntro

l of V

olat

ile O

rgan

ic E

miss

ions

from

Exi

stin

g St

atio

nary

Sou

rces

– V

olum

e V:

Sur

face

Co

atin

g of

Lar

ge A

pplia

nces

Re

gula

tion

7 Se

ctio

ns V

. and

IX.

12/1

4/19

78 a

nd

5/22

/198

0 8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

2007

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues G

uide

lines

for L

arge

App

lianc

e Co

atin

gs

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V. a

nd IX

. 12

/14/

1978

and

12

/4/1

980

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

2008

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues f

or M

iscel

lane

ous P

last

ic P

arts

Coa

tings

Re

gula

tion

7 Se

ctio

ns V

. and

IX.

12/1

4/19

78 a

nd

12/4

/198

0 8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

1978

Co

ntro

l of V

olat

ile O

rgan

ic E

miss

ions

from

Exi

stin

g St

atio

nary

Sou

rces

– V

olum

e VI

I: Fa

ctor

y Su

rfac

e Co

atin

g of

Fla

t Woo

d Pa

nelin

g

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V. a

nd IX

. 40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

art Q

QQ

Q

12/1

4/19

78 a

nd

9/20

/198

9 8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

2006

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues G

uide

lines

for F

lat W

ood

Pane

ling

Coat

ings

Re

gula

tion

7 Se

ctio

ns V

. and

IX.

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

t QQ

QQ

12/1

4/19

78 a

nd

9/20

/198

9 8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

1978

Co

ntro

l of V

olat

ile O

rgan

ic E

miss

ions

from

Man

ufac

ture

of P

neum

atic

Rub

ber T

ires

Re

gula

tion

7 Se

ctio

ns V

. and

IX.

12/1

4/19

78 a

nd

9/20

/198

9 8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

1978

Co

ntro

l of

Vol

atile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns f

rom

Exi

stin

g St

atio

nary

Sou

rces

– V

olum

e VI

II:

Grap

hic

Arts

-Rot

ogra

vure

and

Fle

xogr

aphy

Re

gula

tion

7 Se

ctio

ns V

. and

XIII

. 12

/14/

1978

and

12

/4/1

980

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

1982

Co

ntro

l of V

olat

ile O

rgan

ic C

ompo

und

Emiss

ions

from

Lar

ge P

etro

leum

Dry

Cle

aner

s

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR P

art 6

0 Su

bpar

t JJJ

12

/14/

1978

8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

1983

Co

ntro

l of

Vol

atile

Org

anic

Com

poun

d Em

issio

ns f

rom

Man

ufac

ture

of

High

-Den

sity

Poly

ethy

lene

, Pol

ypro

pyle

ne, a

nd P

olys

tyre

ne R

esin

s

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

ts U

, JJJ

12

/14/

1978

8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

1984

Co

ntro

l of V

olat

ile O

rgan

ic C

ompo

und

Leak

s fr

om S

ynth

etic

Org

anic

Che

mic

al P

olym

er a

nd

Resin

Man

ufac

turin

g Eq

uipm

ent

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR 6

0, S

ubpa

rts V

V, V

Va

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

1984

Co

ntro

l of V

olat

ile O

rgan

ic C

ompo

und

Emiss

ions

from

Air

Oxi

datio

n Pr

oces

ses

in S

ynth

etic

O

rgan

ic C

hem

ical

Man

ufac

turin

g In

dust

ry

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR 6

0, S

ubpa

rt II

I 12

/14/

1978

8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

1993

Co

ntro

l of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Com

poun

d Em

issio

ns f

rom

Rea

ctor

Pro

cess

es a

nd D

istill

atio

n O

pera

tions

in S

ynth

etic

Org

anic

Che

mic

al M

anuf

actu

ring

Indu

stry

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR 6

0, S

ubpa

rts N

NN

, RRR

12

/14/

1978

8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

1994

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hnol

ogy

Docu

men

t – S

urfa

ce C

oatin

g O

pera

tions

at S

hipb

uild

ing

and

Ship

Rep

air F

acili

ties

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

t II

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Page 12: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-12

Date

of C

TG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do ru

le

Date

of

Colo

rado

ad

optio

n

Date

of

mos

t re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Reg

ulat

ion

7

1996

(A

CT

1994

) Co

ntro

l Te

chni

ques

Gui

delin

es f

or S

hipb

uild

ing

and

Ship

Rep

air

Ope

ratio

ns (

Surf

ace

Coat

ing)

EPA

Not

e –

See

also

EPA

-453

/R-9

4-03

2.

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

t II

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

2006

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues G

uide

lines

for F

lexi

ble

Pack

age

Prin

ting

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

ts JJ

JJ, K

K

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

2008

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues G

uide

line

for F

iber

glas

s Boa

t Man

ufac

turin

g M

ater

ials

Re

gula

tion

7 Se

ctio

n V.

40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

art V

VVV

12

/14/

1978

8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

2008

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ue G

uide

lines

for M

iscel

lane

ous I

ndus

tria

l Adh

esiv

es

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR P

art

60 S

ubpa

rt R

R, 4

0 CF

R Pa

rt 6

3 Su

bpar

ts K

K, JJ

JJ

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Page 13: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-13

Appe

ndix

6-B

– C

TGs C

olor

ado

Has A

dopt

ed

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1975

Desig

n Cr

iteria

for S

tage

I Va

por

Cont

rol S

yste

ms

– Ga

solin

e Se

rvic

e St

atio

ns

EPA

Note

This

docu

men

t is

rega

rded

as

a CT

G al

thou

gh i

t w

as

neve

r pu

blish

ed w

ith a

n EP

A do

cum

ent n

umbe

r.

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d VI

. 40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

art

CCCC

CC

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Eq

uip

pum

ps

and

com

pres

sors

w

ith

mec

hani

cal s

eals

or o

ther

of

equ

al e

ffici

ency

, equ

ip

stor

age

tank

s w

ith

float

ing

roof

and

vap

or

gath

erin

g sy

stem

, rou

tine

tank

in

spec

tions

, su

bmer

ged

fill a

nd v

apor

co

ntro

l sys

tem

, loa

d le

ak

tight

tran

spor

t tru

cks

and

vapo

r col

lect

ion

syst

em

Stag

e I

cont

rols,

va

por

bala

nce

syst

ems,

subm

erge

d fil

l, le

ak t

ight

co

nditi

ons,

vapo

r co

llect

ion

syst

ems

Calif

orni

a: t

rans

fer

vapo

r re

cove

ry s

yste

m,

vapo

r tig

ht

and

liqui

d tig

ht

lines

an

d co

nnec

tions

, bo

ttom

fill

, ta

nk f

loat

ing

roof

se

als

and

cove

rs,

rout

ine

insp

ectio

ns,

cert

ified

spi

ll bo

x, c

argo

tank

vap

or in

tegr

ity

test

ing,

can

not

purg

e ga

solin

e fr

om c

argo

ta

nk to

atm

osph

ere,

clo

sed

cont

aine

rs

Texa

s: s

ubm

erge

d fil

l, va

por

cont

rol s

yste

m,

vapo

r tig

ht t

rans

port

ves

sels,

tan

k co

ntro

l w

ith s

ubm

erge

d fil

l/vap

or c

ontr

ol s

yste

m/o

r flo

atin

g ro

of, r

outin

e in

spec

tions

Ar

izona

: su

bmer

ged

fill

and

pres

sure

/vac

uum

va

lve,

va

por

reco

very

sy

stem

, ta

nk

float

ing

roof

se

als,

ro

utin

e in

spec

tions

, va

por-

tight

an

d le

ak-t

ight

tr

ansp

ort

vess

els,

co

ntro

l de

liver

y ve

ssel

pu

rge

emiss

ions

90%

RB

LC: s

tage

I an

d II

vapo

r rec

over

y sy

stem

1976

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns

from

Ex

istin

g St

atio

nary

So

urce

s –

Volu

me

I: Co

ntro

l M

etho

ds

for

Surf

ace

Coat

ing

Ope

ratio

ns

EPA

Note

Alth

ough

of

ten

liste

d w

ith th

e CT

Gs

for h

istor

ical r

easo

ns, t

his

docu

men

t do

es

not

defin

e RA

CT

for

any

sour

ce. I

t is a

com

pila

tion

of co

ntro

l tec

hniq

ues.

NA

– co

mpi

latio

n of

con

trol

tech

niqu

es

Page 14: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-14

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1977

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns

from

Ex

istin

g St

atio

nary

So

urce

s –

Volu

me

II:

Surf

ace

Coat

ing

of C

ans,

Co

ils

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d IX

. 40

CF

R Pa

rt

60,

Subp

arts

TT

, WW

40

CF

R Pa

rt

63,

Subp

arts

KK

KK, S

SSSS

12/1

4/19

78

and

5/22

/198

0

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Fu

gitiv

e VO

C co

ntro

l –

cove

rs,

clos

ed

cont

aine

rs,

prop

er

disp

osal

Ca

n co

atin

g VO

C co

nten

t lim

it 2.

8 to

5.5

lb/g

al

Coil

coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

limit

2.6

lb/g

al

Cans

coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

limit

2.8

to 4

.2

lb/g

al;

avai

labl

e co

ntro

l op

tions

: in

cine

ratio

n,

wat

er-b

orne

/hig

h so

lids/

pow

der

coat

ings

, ca

rbon

ad

sorp

tion,

ul

trav

iole

t cur

ing

Coils

coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

limit

2.6

lb/g

al;

avai

labl

e co

ntro

l opt

ions

: in

cine

ratio

n,

wat

er-

born

e/hi

gh

solid

s co

atin

gs

Calif

orni

a: c

ans

– co

atin

g VO

C co

nten

t 0.

1-5.

5 lb

/gal

, co

atin

g VO

C co

nten

t 20

-750

g/l,

cl

eani

ng

solv

ent

VOC

cont

ent

0.21

-0.2

3 lb

/gal

, m

ay

com

ply

with

90

%

cont

rol,

appl

icat

ion

met

hods

, clo

sed

cont

aine

rs; c

oils

– co

atin

g VO

C co

nten

t 1.

7 lb

/gal

, VO

C co

nten

t 20

0 g/

l, cl

eani

ng

solv

ent

VOC

cont

ent

0.21

-0.2

3 lb

/gal

, m

ay c

ompl

y w

ith

90%

con

trol

, ap

plic

atio

n m

etho

ds,

clos

ed

cont

aine

rs

Texa

s:

can

coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

2.8-

5.5

lb/g

al, c

oil c

oatin

g VO

C co

nten

t 2.6

lb/g

al

Arizo

na:

can

coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

2.5-

5.5

lb/g

al,

coil

coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

2.6

lb/g

al,

alte

rnat

ive

cont

rol

devi

ce 9

0%,

appl

icat

ion

met

hods

, cl

osed

co

ntai

ners

, sp

ray

gun

clea

ning

pra

ctic

es

RBLC

: ca

n –

NSP

S W

W, c

ompl

iant

coa

tings

, th

erm

al o

xida

tion,

cle

anin

g so

lven

t an

d in

k VO

C co

nten

t M

enu:

inci

nera

tion,

tot

al e

nclo

sure

, pro

cess

m

odifi

catio

ns, V

OC

cont

ent l

imits

Page 15: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-15

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1977

Co

ntro

l of

Vo

latil

e O

rgan

ic

Emiss

ions

fr

om

Solv

ent M

etal

Cle

anin

g

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d X.

12

/14/

1978

8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Co

ntro

l so

lven

t co

ld-

clea

ners

with

cov

ers

and

drai

nage

fac

ility

; co

ntro

l no

n-co

nvey

orize

d va

por

degr

ease

rs

with

co

vers

, sa

fety

sw

itche

s,

and

cont

rol

syst

ems;

con

trol

co

nvey

orize

d de

grea

sers

w

ith

cont

rol

devi

ces,

dr

ying

tu

nnel

, sa

fety

sw

itche

s, c

over

s

Equi

pmen

t spe

cific

atio

ns,

oper

atin

g re

quire

men

ts,

min

imize

so

lven

t lo

ss,

repa

ir le

akin

g eq

uipm

ent,

cont

rol

devi

ces

Calif

orni

a: c

old

clea

ners

use

cov

ers,

dry

rack

, fr

eebo

ard

ratio

or

co

ntro

l 85

-95%

or

en

clos

ed d

esig

n; o

pen

top

and

conv

eyor

ized

vapo

r de

grea

sers

fre

e of

liq

uid

leak

s, a

nd

tran

sfer

with

lea

k pr

oof

coup

lings

, sa

fety

sw

itche

s, fr

eebo

ard

ratio

; VO

C co

nten

t lim

it 0.

42 lb

/gal

; may

com

ply

with

airl

ess/

air-

tight

cl

eani

ng

syst

em;

repa

ir le

aks;

cl

osed

co

ntai

ners

Te

xas:

col

d-cl

eani

ng u

se c

over

and

enc

lose

d dr

aini

ng, o

pen

top

degr

easin

g us

e co

ver a

nd

free

boar

d ra

tio

or

cont

rol

85%

, co

nver

yoriz

ed

degr

easin

g co

ntro

l w

ith

refr

iger

ated

ch

iller

85

%

or

carb

on

adso

rptio

n an

d tr

ying

tunn

el

Arizo

na: c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

, int

erna

l dra

inag

e ra

ck,

impe

rvio

us c

over

, dr

ying

tun

nel,

may

co

ntro

l with

con

trol

or s

eale

d sy

stem

RB

LC:

vapo

r co

nden

sing/

reco

very

sy

stem

, op

erat

ing

time

limit

Page 16: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-16

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1977

Cont

rol

of

Refin

ery

Vacu

um

Prod

ucin

g Sy

stem

s,

Was

tew

ater

Se

para

tors

, an

d Pr

oces

s U

nit T

urna

roun

ds

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d VI

II.

40 C

FR P

art 6

0 Su

bpar

t QQ

Q

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

One

m

ajor

sou

rce

– se

e Ta

ble

6

Proc

ess

unit

turn

arou

nds

oper

atin

g pr

oced

ures

, va

cuum

pr

oduc

ing

syst

em

fireb

ox

com

bust

ion,

was

tew

ater

se

para

tors

co

vers

, pr

oces

s un

its

depr

essu

rized

to

fla

re/f

uel

gas

syst

em/o

ther

co

mbu

stio

n de

vice

be

fore

ope

ning

Calif

orni

a:

cont

rol

and

min

imize

fla

ring,

op

erat

e fla

res

in

smok

eles

s m

anne

r, m

aint

ain

flare

pi

lot

flam

es,

rout

ine

insp

ectio

ns,

colle

ct

vapo

rs

whe

n de

pres

suriz

ing

vess

els,

co

ver

was

tew

ater

se

para

tors

and

sum

ps a

nd s

ewer

lin

es a

nd

proc

ess

drai

ns,

cont

rol

emiss

ions

fr

om

vacu

um p

rodu

cing

sys

tem

, co

ver

hot

wel

ls an

d ac

cum

ulat

ors

Texa

s: c

ompo

nent

s w

ith w

ater

sea

ls, c

lose

d op

enin

gs, j

unct

ion

box

vent

s co

ntro

l 90%

or

encl

osed

sy

stem

, ro

utin

e in

spec

tions

, co

ntro

l ste

am e

ject

or o

r mec

hani

cal v

acuu

m

pum

p ve

nt

stre

am

90%

, co

ntro

l ho

twel

l em

issio

ns,

reco

ver

emiss

ions

du

ring

turn

arou

nd,

equi

p w

ater

se

para

tor

with

va

por r

ecov

ery

syst

em

RBLC

: M

ACT

CC,

NES

HAP

FF,

NSP

S Q

QQ

, co

vere

d sy

stem

, vap

or c

ombu

stor

, goo

d ai

r po

llutio

n co

ntro

l pra

ctic

es, s

ubm

erge

d fil

l

1977

Co

ntro

l of

Hyd

roca

rbon

s fr

om T

ank

Truc

k Ga

solin

e Lo

adin

g Te

rmin

als

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

, VI

., an

d XV

. 40

CFR

Par

t 60

Subp

art X

X 40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

arts

R,

BB

BBBB

12/1

4/19

78

and

4/9/

1981

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Eq

uip

pum

ps

and

com

pres

sors

w

ith

mec

hani

cal s

eals

or o

ther

of

equ

al e

ffici

ency

, equ

ip

stor

age

tank

s w

ith

float

ing

roof

and

vap

or

gath

erin

g sy

stem

, rou

tine

tank

in

spec

tions

, su

bmer

ged

fill a

nd v

apor

co

ntro

l sys

tem

, loa

d le

ak

tight

tran

spor

t tru

cks

and

vapo

r col

lect

ion

syst

em

Vapo

r col

lect

ion

syst

ems,

leak

tig

ht

cond

ition

s,

subm

erge

d fil

l

Calif

orni

a: t

rans

fer

vapo

r re

cove

ry s

yste

m,

vapo

r tig

ht

and

liqui

d tig

ht

lines

an

d co

nnec

tions

, bo

ttom

fill

, ta

nk f

loat

ing

roof

se

als

and

cove

rs,

rout

ine

insp

ectio

ns,

cert

ified

spi

ll bo

x, c

argo

tank

vap

or in

tegr

ity

test

ing,

can

not

purg

e ga

solin

e fr

om c

argo

ta

nk to

atm

osph

ere,

clo

sed

cont

aine

rs

Texa

s: s

ubm

erge

d fil

l, va

por

cont

rol s

yste

m,

vapo

r tig

ht t

rans

port

ves

sels,

tan

k co

ntro

l w

ith s

ubm

erge

d fil

l/vap

or c

ontr

ol s

yste

m/o

r flo

atin

g ro

of, r

outin

e in

spec

tions

Ar

izona

: su

bmer

ged

fill

and

pres

sure

/vac

uum

va

lve,

va

por

reco

very

sy

stem

, ta

nk

float

ing

roof

se

als,

ro

utin

e in

spec

tions

, va

por-

tight

an

d le

ak-t

ight

tr

ansp

ort

vess

els,

co

ntro

l de

liver

y ve

ssel

pu

rge

emiss

ions

90%

RB

LC:

subm

erge

d fil

l, m

inim

ize s

pills

, va

por

reco

very

uni

t

Page 17: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-17

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1977

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns

from

Ex

istin

g St

atio

nary

So

urce

s –

Volu

me

III:

Surf

ace

Coat

ing

of M

etal

Fu

rnitu

re

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d IX

. 40

CFR

Par

t 60

Subp

art E

E 40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

art R

RRR

12/1

4/19

78

and

5/22

/198

0

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Fu

gitiv

e VO

C co

ntro

l –

cove

rs,

clos

ed

cont

aine

rs,

prop

er

disp

osal

Co

atin

g VO

C co

nten

t lim

it 3.

0 lb

/gal

Coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

limit

3.0

lb/g

al

Calif

orni

a: c

oatin

g VO

C co

nten

t lim

its 2

.3 t

o 5.

8 lb

/gal

, may

com

ply

with

con

trol

85-

95%

, cl

osed

con

tain

ers,

min

imize

spi

lls,

spec

ified

ap

plic

atio

n m

etho

ds,

clea

ning

sol

vent

VO

C co

nten

t lim

it 0.

42 lb

/gal

unl

ess

cont

rol 8

5%,

clea

n sp

ray

equi

pmen

t w

ith

non-

orga

nic

solv

ent,

strip

per

VOC

cont

ent

limit

1.7

lb/g

al,

subs

trat

e su

rfac

e cl

eani

ng

VOC

cont

ent l

imit

0.21

lb/g

al

Texa

s: c

oatin

g VO

C co

nten

t lim

it 2.

3 to

5.1

lb

/gal

, cl

osed

co

ntai

ners

, m

inim

ize

spill

s,

spec

ified

app

licat

ion

met

hods

Ar

izona

: co

atin

g VO

C lim

it 3.

0 lb

/gal

, sp

ecifi

ed

appl

icat

ion

met

hod,

cl

osed

co

ntai

ners

EP

A M

enu:

CTG

, re

form

ulat

ion

or p

roce

ss

mod

ifica

tion

(see

SCA

QM

D), r

educ

ed so

lven

t ut

iliza

tion,

per

man

ent t

otal

enc

losu

re

2007

Co

ntro

l Te

chni

ques

Gu

idel

ines

fo

r M

etal

Fu

rnitu

re C

oatin

gs

Coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

limit

2.3

to 3

.5 lb

/gal

O

ptio

nal

add-

on c

ontr

ol

devi

ce

Appl

icat

ion

met

hods

Cl

eani

ng

mat

eria

l w

ork

prac

tices

clos

ed

cont

aine

rs,

min

imize

sp

ills

1977

Co

ntro

l of

Vo

latil

e O

rgan

ic

Emiss

ions

fr

om

Bulk

Gas

olin

e Pl

ants

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

, VI

., an

d XV

. 40

CFR

Par

t 60

Subp

art X

X

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

ts

R,

BBBB

BB

12/1

4/19

78

and

4/9/

1981

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Eq

uip

pum

ps

and

com

pres

sors

w

ith

mec

hani

cal s

eals

or o

ther

of

equ

al e

ffici

ency

, equ

ip

stor

age

tank

s w

ith

float

ing

roof

and

vap

or

gath

erin

g sy

stem

, rou

tine

tank

in

spec

tions

, su

bmer

ged

fill a

nd v

apor

co

ntro

l sys

tem

, loa

d le

ak

tight

tran

spor

t tru

cks

and

vapo

r col

lect

ion

syst

em

Vapo

r col

lect

ion

syst

ems,

leak

tig

ht

cond

ition

s,

subm

erge

d fil

l

Calif

orni

a: t

rans

fer

vapo

r re

cove

ry s

yste

m,

vapo

r tig

ht

and

liqui

d tig

ht

lines

an

d co

nnec

tions

, bo

ttom

fill

, ta

nk f

loat

ing

roof

se

als

and

cove

rs,

rout

ine

insp

ectio

ns,

cert

ified

spi

ll bo

x, c

argo

tank

vap

or in

tegr

ity

test

ing,

can

not

purg

e ga

solin

e fr

om c

argo

ta

nk to

atm

osph

ere,

clo

sed

cont

aine

rs

Texa

s: s

ubm

erge

d fil

l, va

por

cont

rol s

yste

m,

vapo

r tig

ht t

rans

port

ves

sels,

tan

k co

ntro

l w

ith s

ubm

erge

d fil

l/vap

or c

ontr

ol s

yste

m/o

r flo

atin

g ro

of, r

outin

e in

spec

tions

Ar

izona

: su

bmer

ged

fill

and

pres

sure

/vac

uum

va

lve,

va

por

reco

very

sy

stem

, ta

nk

float

ing

roof

se

als,

ro

utin

e in

spec

tions

, va

por-

tight

an

d le

ak-t

ight

tr

ansp

ort

vess

els,

co

ntro

l de

liver

y ve

ssel

pu

rge

emiss

ions

90%

RB

LC:

subm

erge

d fil

l, m

inim

ize s

pills

, va

por

reco

very

uni

t

Page 18: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-18

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1977

(A

CT

1994

)

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns

from

St

orag

e of

Pe

trol

eum

Li

quid

s in

Fi

xed-

Roof

Ta

nks

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d VI

. 40

CFR

Par

t 60

Subp

art K

, Kb

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

t CC

, EE

EE, B

BBBB

B

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Fi

xed

roof

se

als

and

vapo

r ga

ther

ing

syst

em,

rout

ine

insp

ectio

ns

Equi

pmen

t spe

cific

atio

ns,

inte

rnal

flo

atin

g ro

of o

r eq

uiva

lent

, m

aint

enan

ce

requ

irem

ents

, in

spec

tions

(A

CT

expa

nded

to

ch

emic

al p

lant

s)

Calif

orni

a: v

apor

loss

con

trol

dev

ice,

con

trol

ta

nk d

egas

sing

and

clea

ning

em

issio

ns 9

0-95

%,

tank

flo

atin

g ro

of

seal

s,

rout

ine

insp

ectio

ns, b

otto

m lo

adin

g, m

aint

ain

faci

lity

leak

-free

and

vap

or-t

ight

, low

em

issio

n fix

ed

liqui

d le

vel g

auge

s and

con

nect

ors

Texa

s: m

aint

ain

wor

king

pre

ssur

e to

pre

vent

va

por

or g

as l

oss

to a

tmos

pher

e, c

ontr

ol

with

sub

mer

ged

fill o

r va

por

cont

rol s

yste

m

or fl

oatin

g ro

of, f

loat

ing

roof

seal

insp

ectio

ns

Arizo

na:

tank

s w

ith f

loat

ing

roof

or

vapo

r co

llect

ion

syst

em, f

loat

ing

roof

sea

ls, ro

utin

e in

spec

tions

EP

A M

enu:

seal

s (se

e SC

AQM

D)

RBLC

: su

bmer

ged

fill,

alum

inum

or

whi

te

colo

r, va

por

bala

ncin

g,

fuel

sp

ecifi

catio

n,

MAC

T CC

, in

tern

al f

loat

ing

roof

, RT

O,

good

de

sign,

op

erat

ing

prac

tices

, en

clos

ed

com

bust

or, s

tage

I an

d II

Page 19: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-19

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1977

Co

ntro

l of

Vo

latil

e O

rgan

ic

Emiss

ions

fr

om

Use

of C

utba

ck A

spha

lt

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d XI

. 12

/14/

1978

8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

So

urce

s su

bjec

t to

R7 u

se

limita

tion

Oct

-Feb

Subs

titut

e em

ulsio

ns f

or

cutb

ack

asph

alt

Calif

orni

a: c

utba

ck a

spha

lt <

0.5

% o

rgan

ic

com

poun

ds

that

ev

apor

ate

at

< 50

0F;

emul

sifie

d as

phal

t <

3% o

rgan

ic c

ompo

unds

th

at

evap

orat

e at

<

500F

; no

ra

pid

or

med

ium

-cur

e liq

uid

asph

alt;

slow

-cur

e liq

uid

asph

alt

< 0.

5% p

etro

leum

sol

vent

s th

at b

oil

at <

500

F (e

xem

ptio

n w

hen

tem

p fo

r 24

hour

<

50F)

; no

cutb

ack

asph

alt i

n So

uth

Zone

Te

xas:

cut

back

asp

halt

limite

d to

< 7

% o

f to

tal

annu

al

volu

me;

no

cu

tbac

k as

phal

t Ap

ril

16-S

ept

15;

asph

alt

emul

sion

VOC

cont

ent 0

.5 to

12%

by

wei

ght;

exem

ptio

n fo

r cu

tbac

k as

phal

t as p

enet

ratin

g pr

ime

coat

Ar

izona

: no

ra

pid

cure

cu

tbac

k as

phal

t; cu

tbac

k as

phal

t < 0

.5%

VO

C th

at e

vapo

rate

s at

< 5

00F;

em

ulsif

ied

asph

alt <

3%

VO

C th

at

evap

orat

es a

t <

500F

; ex

empt

ion

for

non-

rapi

d cu

re c

utba

ck a

spha

lt as

a p

enet

ratin

g pr

ime

coat

EP

A M

enu:

re

form

ulat

ion,

pr

oces

s m

odifi

catio

n

1978

Cont

rol

Tech

niqu

es

for

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns

from

St

atio

nary

So

urce

s EP

A No

te

– Th

is do

cum

ent

is of

ten

liste

d w

ith C

TGs,

but i

t doe

s not

de

fine

RACT

fo

r an

y pa

rticu

lar s

ourc

e.

NA

– co

mpi

latio

n of

con

trol

tech

niqu

es

1978

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns

from

Ex

istin

g St

atio

nary

So

urce

s –

Volu

me

VI:

Surf

ace

Coat

ing

of

Misc

ella

neou

s M

etal

Pa

rts a

nd P

rodu

cts

Regu

latio

n 7S

Se

ctio

ns

V.

and

IX.

40

CFR

Part

63

, Su

bpar

t M

MM

M

12/1

4/19

78

and1

2/4/

1980

8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Fu

gitiv

e VO

C co

ntro

l –

cove

rs,

clos

ed

Coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

limit

3.0

to

4.3

lb/g

al;

avai

labl

e co

ntro

l opt

ions

: in

cine

ratio

n,

wat

er-

born

e/hi

gh

solid

s/po

wde

r co

atin

gs,

carb

on a

dsor

ptio

n

Calif

orni

a:

coat

ings

VO

C co

nten

t 2.

3-7.

3 lb

/gal

, VO

C co

nten

t 60

-680

g/

l, cl

eani

ng

solv

ent

VOC

cont

ent

0.21

-0.2

3 lb

/gal

, m

ay

com

ply

with

85

-95%

co

ntro

l, cl

osed

co

ntai

ners

, app

licat

ion

met

hods

Te

xas:

coa

tings

VO

C co

nten

t 2.

3-6.

7 lb

/gal

,

Page 20: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-20

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

2008

Co

ntro

l Te

chni

ques

fo

r M

iscel

lane

ous

Met

al

Part

s Coa

tings

cont

aine

rs,

prop

er

disp

osal

Co

atin

g VO

C co

nten

t lim

it 3.

0 to

4.3

lb/g

al

Coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

limit

2.3

to6.

2 lb

/gal

; ap

plic

atio

n m

etho

ds;

alte

rnat

ive

use

of a

dd-o

n co

ntro

l; w

ork

prac

tices

(c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

, m

inim

ize sp

ills)

appl

icat

ion

met

hods

, wor

k pr

actic

es

Arizo

na: c

oatin

g VO

C co

nten

t 3.

0-3.

5 lb

/gal

, al

tern

ativ

e co

ntro

l de

vice

90%

, ap

plic

atio

n m

etho

ds,

clos

ed

cont

aine

rs,

spra

y gu

n cl

eani

ng p

ract

ices

RB

LC: c

onsu

mpt

ion

limits

, VO

C co

nten

t 3.

5-7.

25 lb

/gal

, HVL

P, c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

, car

bon

adso

rptio

n M

enu:

VO

C co

nten

t lim

its,

add-

on c

ontr

ol,

CTG

1978

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Com

poun

d Le

aks

from

Pet

role

um R

efin

ery

Equi

pmen

t

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d VI

II.

40 C

FR P

art 6

0 Su

bpar

ts G

GG,

GGGa

, J, J

a 40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

art C

C

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

One

m

ajor

sou

rce

– se

e Ta

ble

6 Le

ak d

etec

tion

and

repa

ir

Calif

orni

a:

leak

dete

ctio

n an

d re

pair

(7

days

), ro

utin

e in

spec

tions

; ven

t PRD

to v

apor

re

cove

ry o

r disp

osal

sys

tem

, lea

k th

resh

olds

: eq

uipm

ent,

conn

ecto

r, an

d va

lves

>

100

ppm

, pu

mp,

com

pres

sor,

and

PRD

> 50

0 pp

m,

com

pone

nts,

co

nnec

tions

, fla

nges

, pu

mps

, co

mpr

esso

rs,

PRD

> 20

0 to

10,

000

ppm

v; r

epai

r 0

to 7

day

s; r

eins

pect

aft

er

repa

ir; c

ap/s

eal o

pen-

ende

d lin

es a

nd v

alve

s Te

xas:

ro

utin

e in

spec

tion,

st

ep

up/d

own

insp

ectio

n fr

eque

ncy

optio

n, r

epai

r le

aks,

le

ak

thre

shol

ds:

pum

ps

and

com

pres

sors

20

00 p

pm a

nd o

ther

com

pone

nts 5

00 p

pm

EPA

Men

u: p

roce

ss m

odifi

catio

n, f

lare

gas

re

cove

ry u

nit,

flarin

g lim

its a

nd o

pera

tiona

l pr

actic

e (s

ee S

CAQ

MD)

RB

LC:

quar

terly

lea

k de

tect

ion

and

repa

ir,

MAC

T H,

NES

HAP

V, M

ACT

CC, N

SPS

GGGa

, M

ACT

FFFF

Page 21: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-21

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1978

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns

from

M

anuf

actu

re

of

Synt

hesiz

ed

Phar

mac

eutic

al P

rodu

cts

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

, IX

., an

d XI

V.

40

CFR

Part

63

, Su

bpar

t GG

G

12/1

4/19

78

and

9/

20/1

989

and

12/4

/198

0

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Fu

gitiv

e VO

C co

ntro

l –

cove

rs,

clos

ed

cont

aine

rs,

prop

er

disp

osal

Co

ntro

l em

issio

ns

from

re

acto

rs,

dist

illat

ion

oper

atio

ns,

crys

talli

zers

, ce

ntrif

uge

and

vacu

um

drye

rs

with

su

rfac

e co

nden

sers

or

equi

vale

nt

cont

rols;

va

por

bala

nce

syst

em f

or t

rans

fer

from

tr

uck

or ra

ilcar

to s

tora

ge

tank

s;

encl

ose

cent

rifug

es,

rota

ry

vacu

um

filte

rs,

othe

r fil

ters

; co

vers

on

in

-pr

oces

s ta

nks;

re

pair

leak

s; c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

Cont

rols

(e.g

., co

nden

sers

, sc

rubb

ers,

ca

rbon

ads

orbe

rs,

vapo

r re

turn

line

s, c

onse

rvat

ion

vent

s, p

ress

ure

tank

s) fo

r dr

yers

, re

acto

rs,

dist

illat

ion

units

, st

orag

e an

d tr

ansf

er,

filte

rs,

extr

acto

rs,

cent

rifug

es,

crys

talli

zers

; m

ay

be

reas

onab

le

to

regu

late

on

pla

nt b

y pl

ant b

asis

Calif

orni

a:

cont

rol

reac

tors

, di

still

atio

n co

lum

ns,

crys

talli

zers

, ce

ntrif

uges

w

ith

surf

ace

cond

ense

rs o

r eq

uiva

lent

; en

clos

e ce

ntrif

uges

and

vac

uum

filt

ers;

tan

k co

vers

; op

erat

iona

l req

uire

men

ts; c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

Te

xas:

co

ntro

l re

acto

rs,

dist

illat

ion

units

, cr

ysta

llize

rs, c

entr

ifuge

s, v

acuu

m d

ryer

s with

co

nden

ser;

cove

r in

-pro

cess

tan

ks;

cont

rol

air

drye

rs,

prod

uctio

n eq

uipm

ent

exha

ust

syst

em, l

oadi

ng fa

cilit

ies 9

0%

Arizo

na: c

ontr

ol r

eact

or, d

istill

atio

n co

lum

n,

crys

talli

zer,

cent

rifug

e w

ith

surf

ace

cond

ense

r or

equ

ival

ent;

cove

r in

-pro

cess

ta

nks;

con

trol

vac

uum

filte

r, ot

her f

ilter

, and

se

para

tion

devi

ce

90%

; co

ntro

l ch

emic

al

ster

ilize

r 75

%;

cont

rol a

ir dr

yer

90%

; re

pair

leak

s; c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

EP

A M

enu:

eq

uipm

ent

and

oper

atio

nal

requ

irem

ents

(see

SCA

QM

D)

RBLC

: sc

rubb

ers,

in

cine

rato

r, ca

rbon

ad

sorp

tion,

RTO

, LDA

R

Page 22: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-22

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1978

(A

CT

1994

)

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns

from

Pe

trol

eum

Liq

uid

Stor

age

in E

xter

nal F

loat

ing

Roof

Ta

nks

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d VI

. 40

CFR

Par

t 60

Subp

art K

, Kb

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Fl

oatin

g ro

of

seal

s,

cove

red

roof

dr

ains

, co

vere

d/se

aled

ope

ning

s,

rout

ine

insp

ectio

ns

Equi

pmen

t spe

cific

atio

ns,

seal

s,

mai

nten

ance

re

quire

men

ts,

insp

ectio

ns

Calif

orni

a: v

apor

loss

con

trol

dev

ice,

con

trol

ta

nk d

egas

sing

and

clea

ning

em

issio

ns 9

0-95

%,

tank

flo

atin

g ro

of

seal

s,

rout

ine

insp

ectio

ns, b

otto

m lo

adin

g, m

aint

ain

faci

lity

leak

-free

and

vap

or-t

ight

, low

em

issio

n fix

ed

liqui

d le

vel g

auge

s and

con

nect

ors

Texa

s: m

aint

ain

wor

king

pre

ssur

e to

pre

vent

va

por

or g

as l

oss

to a

tmos

pher

e, c

ontr

ol

with

sub

mer

ged

fill o

r va

por

cont

rol s

yste

m

or fl

oatin

g ro

of, f

loat

ing

roof

seal

insp

ectio

ns

Arizo

na:

tank

s w

ith f

loat

ing

roof

or

vapo

r co

llect

ion

syst

em, f

loat

ing

roof

sea

ls, ro

utin

e in

spec

tions

EP

A M

enu:

seal

s (se

e SC

AQM

D)

RBLC

: su

bmer

ged

fill,

alum

inum

or

whi

te

colo

r, va

por r

ecov

ery,

sea

ls, d

rain

dry

des

ign

bott

oms,

NSP

S Kb

, M

ACT

BBBB

B, l

imite

d ro

of l

andi

ngs,

goo

d en

gine

erin

g pr

actic

es,

LDAR

, dom

e, M

ACT

CC

1978

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Com

poun

d Le

aks

from

Ga

solin

e Ta

nk

Truc

ks

and

Vapo

r Co

llect

ion

Syst

ems

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

, VI

., an

d XV

. 40

CFR

Par

t 60

Subp

art X

X 40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

arts

R,

BB

BBBB

12/1

4/19

78

and

4/9/

1981

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

An

nual

le

ak-t

ight

te

st,

sem

i-ann

ual

visu

al

insp

ectio

ns

Leak

tig

ht

cond

ition

s, va

por c

olle

ctio

n sy

stem

s

Calif

orni

a: v

apor

inte

grity

test

, can

not p

urge

ga

solin

e va

por

from

ca

rgo

tank

to

at

mos

pher

e,

vapo

r an

d liq

uid

leak

fr

ee

conn

ecto

rs

Texa

s: a

nnua

l lea

k-tig

ht te

st

Arizo

na:

vapo

r tig

ht a

nd l

eak

free

ves

sels,

an

nual

leak

tes

t, va

por

retu

rn h

oses

, col

lect

an

d co

ntai

n sp

ills,

can

not p

urge

vap

ors

from

de

liver

y ve

ssel

unl

ess c

ontr

ol 9

0%

RBLC

: va

por

tight

ves

sels,

sub

mer

ged

fill,

RTO

, vap

or c

ombu

stor

Page 23: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-23

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

Mos

t Re

cent

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Sum

mar

y of

Co

lora

do

Regu

latio

n 7

requ

irem

ents

Sum

mar

y of

CT

G re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y of

ot

her

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

– fo

r com

paris

on

1983

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Co

mpo

und

Equi

pmen

t Le

aks

from

N

atur

al

Gas/

Gaso

line

Proc

essin

g Pl

ants

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d XI

I. 40

CFR

Par

t 60

Subp

art

KKK,

O

OO

O,

OO

OO

a (p

ropo

sed)

12/1

4/19

78

and

3/12

/200

4

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

N

SPS

leve

l fu

gitiv

e em

issio

n LD

AR

Leak

det

ectio

n an

d re

pair

Calif

orni

a: le

ak d

etec

tion

and

repa

ir EP

A M

enu:

na

tura

l ga

s pr

oduc

tion

com

pres

sors

SCR

RB

LC: t

herm

al o

xidi

zers

, fla

re, d

iese

l eng

ine

oper

atio

n lim

its,

LNB,

ULN

B, F

GR,

bott

om

fillin

g ta

nks,

al

umin

um

or

whi

te

tank

s,

fugi

tive

LDAR

, he

ater

bur

ner

cont

rol,

good

co

mbu

stio

n pr

actic

es,

float

ing

roof

tan

ks,

encl

osed

oil-

wat

er s

epar

ator

, N

SPS

OO

OO

, de

hy

vapo

r re

cove

ry

unit,

en

clos

ed

com

bust

or

2015

(p

ropo

sed

)*

Cont

rol

Tech

niqu

es

Guid

elin

es fo

r the

Oil

and

Nat

ural

Gas

Indu

stry

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

, XI

I., X

VII.,

and

XV

III.

40 C

FR P

art 6

0 Su

bpar

ts

OO

OO

, O

OO

Oa

(pro

pose

d)

12/1

4/19

78

and

3/12

/200

4 an

d 12

/17/

2006

an

d 12

/12/

2008

Sect

ion

V.

– 8/

5/20

11

(76

FR 4

7443

) Se

ctio

n XI

I. –

2/3/

2008

(7

3 FR

819

4)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

90

%

syst

em

wid

e ta

nk

cont

rols,

95%

ind

ivid

ual

tank

co

ntro

l, no

ta

nk

vent

ing,

95%

cen

trifu

gal

com

pres

sor

cont

rol,

rod

pack

ing

repl

acem

ent

reci

proc

atin

g co

mpr

esso

rs,

low

or

no

blee

d pn

eum

atic

co

ntro

llers

, le

ak

dete

ctio

n an

d re

pair

at

wel

l sit

es/c

ompr

esso

r st

atio

ns/g

as

plan

ts,

liqui

ds u

nloa

ding

BM

Ps,

rout

e ga

s to

sal

es li

ne o

r co

ntro

l

PRO

POSE

D:

95%

ta

nk

cont

rol,

wel

l co

mpl

etio

n re

quire

men

ts,

95%

ce

ntrif

ugal

co

mpr

esso

r co

ntro

l, ro

d pa

ckin

g re

plac

emen

t re

cipr

ocat

ing

com

pres

sors

, lo

w o

r no

bl

eed

pneu

mat

ic

cont

rolle

rs, z

ero

emiss

ion

pneu

mat

ic

pum

ps,

leak

de

tect

ion

and

repa

ir at

w

ell

sites

/com

pres

sor

stat

ions

/gas

pla

nts

Calif

orni

a:

conc

entr

atio

n of

TO

C in

w

ell

cella

r <

500

ppm

v, c

anno

t st

ore

orga

nic

liqui

d in

wel

l cel

lar,

cont

rol g

as 9

5%, r

epai

r ga

seou

s le

aks

> 25

0 pp

mv,

ro

utin

e in

spec

tions

, od

or e

vent

cau

se a

naly

sis a

nd

repo

rt,

repa

ir co

mpo

nent

lea

ks >

10,

000

ppm

v,

clos

ed

acce

ss

hatc

hes,

co

ntro

l em

issio

ns

from

gl

ycol

de

hy

95%

, va

por

reco

very

sys

tem

on

crud

e oi

l sto

rage

tan

ks,

cont

rol

crud

e oi

l st

orag

e ta

nk

dega

ssin

g em

issio

ns

95%

, po

wer

dr

illin

g op

erat

ions

w

ith g

rid p

ower

EP

A M

enu:

red

uce

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

(se

e SC

AQM

D)

Page 24: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-24

Appe

ndix

6-C

(a) –

CTG

s Col

orad

o Co

uld

Cons

ider

Ado

ptin

g –

Aero

spac

e

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Colo

rado

requ

irem

ents

CT

G re

com

men

datio

ns

Oth

er

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

for

com

paris

on

1994

(1

997)

Aero

spac

e (C

TG

&

NES

HAP)

EP

A No

te –

See

also

59

FR-2

9216

, Jun

e 6,

199

4.

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d IX

. 40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

art G

G

12/1

4/19

78

and

12/4

/198

0

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Fu

gitiv

e VO

C co

ntro

l –

cove

rs,

clos

ed

cont

aine

rs,

prop

er

disp

osal

Co

atin

g VO

C lim

it 3.

5 lb

/gal

Spec

ialty

co

atin

g VO

C co

nten

t lim

its

60-1

230

g/l

(exe

mpt

if

use

< 50

ga

l/yr)

, cl

eani

ng s

olve

nt

subj

ect

to w

ork

prac

tices

(c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

), co

ntro

l VO

C em

issio

ns

thro

ugh

prod

uct

subs

titut

ion

(e.g

., w

ater

born

e an

d hi

gh

solid

s m

ater

ials)

an

d eq

uipm

ent

chan

ges

(e.g

., hi

gh

tran

sfer

ef

ficie

ncy

spra

y gu

ns,

spra

y gu

n cl

eane

rs,

and

conv

entio

nal

high

tr

ansf

er

effic

ienc

y m

etho

ds)

Man

ufac

ture

d m

etal

pa

rts

CTG

coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

limits

1.7

to

5.8

lb/g

al

Calif

orni

a: c

oatin

gs V

OC

cont

ent

limits

120

to

100

0 g/

l, co

atin

g VO

C co

nten

t lim

its 1

.3 to

8.

3 lb

/gal

, mas

kant

VO

C co

nten

t lim

it <

600

g/l,

may

con

trol

85%

, str

ippe

rs V

OC

cont

ent

limit

< 2.

5 lb

/gal

, su

rfac

e pr

epar

atio

n VO

C co

nten

t lim

it <

1.67

lb/g

al, c

lean

ing

solv

ent

VOC

limit

0.21

to

1.

67

lb/g

al,

clea

ning

so

lven

t w

/o V

OC

or c

ontr

ol 9

5%,

coat

ings

RO

C co

nten

t lim

it 0.

4 to

8.3

lb/g

al, c

lean

ing

solv

ent R

OC

cont

ent l

imit

< 20

0 g/

l, st

rippe

r RO

C co

nten

t lim

it <

300

g/l,

spec

ified

ap

plic

atio

n m

etho

ds, c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

Te

xas:

coa

tings

VO

C co

nten

t lim

its 6

0 to

12

30

g/l,

spec

ified

ap

plic

atio

n m

etho

ds,

spec

ified

spra

y gu

n cl

eani

ng p

ract

ice

Arizo

na:

coat

ings

VO

C co

nten

t lim

its 6

0 to

10

30 g

/l, m

ay c

ompl

y w

ith c

ontr

ol 8

1%,

spec

ified

ap

plic

atio

n m

etho

ds

or

65%

tr

ansf

er

effic

ienc

y,

clea

ning

so

lven

t VO

C co

mpo

site

vapo

r pr

essu

re <

45

mm

Hg,

cl

osed

con

tain

ers

EPA

Men

u: C

TG

RBLC

: M

ACT

GG,

low

pr

essu

re

or

hand

ap

plic

atio

n, g

ood

wor

k pr

actic

es,

low

VO

C co

atin

gs a

nd so

lven

ts

Faci

lity

Perm

itted

VO

C em

issio

ns, t

py

Estim

ated

ac

tual

VO

C em

issio

ns, t

py

Requ

irem

ents

Lock

heed

M

artin

Sp

ace

Syst

ems (

059-

0099

) 60

2.

51

Coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent

limits

(3.

5 lb

/gal

), HV

LP,

fugi

tive

VOC

emiss

ion

cont

rol,

clea

ning

/deg

reas

ing

cont

rol

Ball

Aero

spac

e (0

13-0

084

& 0

59-0

083)

50

& 2

5 7.

99 &

10.

51

Coat

ing

VOC

cont

ent l

imits

(3.0

-4.3

lb/g

al),

HVLP

, fug

itive

VO

C em

issio

n co

ntro

l, N

ESHA

P HH

HHHH

, , c

lean

ing/

degr

easin

g co

ntro

l

Page 25: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-25

Appe

ndix

6-C

(b) –

CTG

s Col

orad

o Co

uld

Cons

ider

Ado

ptin

g –

Woo

d Fu

rnitu

re M

anuf

actu

ring

Ope

ratio

ns

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Colo

rado

requ

irem

ents

CT

G re

com

men

datio

ns

Oth

er

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

for

com

paris

on

1996

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Co

mpo

und

Emiss

ions

fr

om

Woo

d Fu

rnitu

re

Man

ufac

turin

g O

pera

tions

EP

A No

te

– W

ood

Furn

iture

(CT

G-M

ACT)

Draf

t M

ACT

out

5-19

94;

Fina

l CTG

issu

ed 4

-199

6.

See

also

61

FR

-252

23,

May

20,

199

6 an

d 61

FR-

5082

3,

Sept

embe

r 27

, 19

96.

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ions

V.

an

d IX

. 40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

art J

J

12/1

4/19

78

and

9/

20/1

989

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Fu

gitiv

e VO

C co

ntro

l –

cove

rs,

clos

ed

cont

aine

rs,

prop

er

disp

osal

Com

bust

ion

or r

ecov

ery

devi

ce, l

ow V

OC

coat

ings

(0

.8-2

.3

kg

VOC/

kg

solid

s),

pollu

tion

prev

entio

n,

wor

k pr

actic

es

(e.g

., cl

osed

co

ntai

ners

)

Calif

orni

a: c

oatin

gs V

OC

cont

ent

limits

0.2

5 to

6.3

lb/g

al, c

oatin

gs R

OC

cont

ent 2

.0 to

6.3

lb

/gal

, str

ippe

r VO

C co

nten

t <

250

g/l,

may

co

mpl

y w

ith

cont

rol

85-9

0%,

spec

ified

ap

plic

atio

n m

etho

ds,

clos

ed

cont

aine

rs,

clea

ning

solv

ent V

OC

cont

ent 0

.21

lb/g

al

Texa

s: c

oatin

gs V

OC

cont

ent l

imits

0.8

to 2

.3

kg V

OC/

kg s

olid

s or

vap

or c

ontr

ol s

yste

m

equi

vale

nt r

educ

tion,

cle

anin

g so

lven

t VO

C co

nten

t <

8% V

OC,

pro

hibi

ts c

onve

ntio

nal

spra

y gu

n Ar

izona

: coa

tings

VO

C co

nten

t 1.

8 to

2.3

lb

VOC/

lb so

lids,

spec

ified

app

licat

ion

met

hods

, cl

eani

ng s

olve

nt V

OC

cont

ent

< 8%

VO

C,

clos

ed c

onta

iner

s EP

A m

enu:

CTG

RB

LC: c

oatin

g re

form

ulat

ion,

pro

per s

pray

ing

tech

niqu

es, p

aint

filte

r

Faci

lity

Perm

itted

VO

C em

issio

ns, t

py

Estim

ated

ac

tual

VO

C em

issio

ns, t

py

Requ

irem

ents

Elka

y W

ood

Prod

ucts

(0

01-1

602)

24

9 13

1 Se

e m

ajor

sour

ce T

able

6

Page 26: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-26

Appe

ndix

6-C

(c) –

CTG

s Col

orad

o Co

uld

Cons

ider

Ado

ptin

g –

Offs

et L

ithog

raph

ic P

rintin

g an

d Le

tter

pres

s Prin

ting

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Colo

rado

requ

irem

ents

CT

G re

com

men

datio

ns

Oth

er

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

for

com

paris

on

2006

(A

CT

1993

, 19

94)

Cont

rol

Tech

niqu

es

Guid

elin

es

for

Offs

et

Lith

ogra

phic

Prin

ting

and

Lett

erpr

ess P

rintin

g

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Redu

ce

emiss

ions

fr

om

foun

tain

so

lutio

n by

lim

iting

alc

ohol

to

< 5%

, cl

eani

ng

mat

eria

ls w

ith

VOC

com

posit

e va

por

pres

sure

< 1

0 m

m H

g or

<

70%

VO

C (e

xclu

ding

110

ga

l no

ncom

plia

nt

clea

ning

mat

eria

ls), w

ork

prac

tices

(c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

), re

duce

em

issio

ns

from

he

atse

t dr

yers

> 2

5 tp

y VO

C w

ith

cont

rol

devi

ces

90-9

5%

(no

reco

mm

ende

d co

ntro

l fro

m s

heet

-fed

or

cold

set w

eb)

Calif

orni

a: In

k VO

C co

nten

t lim

its 1

.25

to 2

.5

lb/g

al, f

ount

ain

solu

tion

limit

1.6

to 8

% V

OC,

cl

eani

ng p

rodu

ct V

OC

limit

0.21

to

0.83

lb

/gal

, may

com

ply

with

con

trol

75%

, clo

sed

cont

aine

rs, s

peci

fied

appl

icat

ion

met

hods

Te

xas:

low

sol

vent

ink

< 2

5% V

OC

or h

igh

solid

s so

lven

t ink

> 6

0% n

onvo

latil

e m

ater

ial

or

vapo

r co

ntro

l sy

stem

90

%

redu

ctio

n,

foun

tain

sol

utio

n al

coho

l co

nten

t <

5% b

y vo

lum

e al

coho

l (h

eats

et)

or <

10%

(sh

eet-

fed)

or

no

al

coho

l (n

on-h

eats

et

prin

ting

new

spap

ers)

, cl

eani

ng s

olve

nt V

OC

cont

ent

< 50

% b

y vo

lum

e VO

C, c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

EP

A M

enu:

CTG

RB

LC:

foun

tain

sol

utio

n VO

C co

nten

t, w

ork

prac

tices

, th

erm

al

oxid

izer,

wat

er

base

d m

ater

ial V

OC

cont

ent,

equi

pmen

t des

ign

Faci

lity

Perm

itted

VO

C em

issio

ns, t

py

Estim

ated

ac

tual

VO

C em

issio

ns, t

py

Requ

irem

ents

Fred

eric

Pr

intin

g (0

01-

0262

) 77

.2

20.0

7 N

on-h

eats

et-s

heet

fed-

offs

et p

rintin

g, l

ow V

OC

inks

, fu

gitiv

e em

issio

n co

ntro

l

Ross

Prin

ting

(001

-063

1)

13.5

5.

37

Shee

tfed-

offs

et p

rintin

g, h

eats

et p

rinte

r w

ith t

herm

al o

xidi

zer,

fugi

tive

emiss

ion

cont

rol

Mid

o Pr

intin

g (0

01-0

940)

10

.41

3.08

N

on-h

eats

et-s

heet

fed

prin

ting,

low

VO

C in

ks, f

ugiti

ve e

miss

ion

cont

rol

Fuse

Inc

(001

-196

7)

5 3.

96

Non

-hea

tset

-she

etfe

d pr

intin

g, b

iore

new

able

veg

etab

le a

nd a

queo

us

base

d in

ks, f

ugiti

ve e

miss

ion

cont

rol

Sile

r Prin

ting

(001

-197

9)

5 3.

96

Non

-hea

tset

-she

etfe

d pr

intin

g, fu

gitiv

e em

issio

n co

ntro

l

Cott

rell

Prin

ting

(005

-11

14)

4.9

4.77

9 N

on-h

eats

et-s

heet

fed

prin

ting,

fugi

tive

emiss

ion

cont

rol

D&K

Prin

ting

(013

-049

6)

12

4.21

N

on-h

eats

et-s

heet

fed

prin

ting,

so

y-ba

sed

inks

, w

ater

m

iscib

le/lo

w

odor

/low

VO

C cl

eanu

p so

lven

t, fu

gitiv

e em

issio

n co

ntro

l

Publ

icat

ion

Prin

ters

(031

-02

34)

24

13.0

2 He

atse

t w

eb, s

heet

fed

offs

et, n

on-h

eats

et w

eb p

rintin

g, lo

w V

OC

inks

, fu

gitiv

e em

issio

n co

ntro

l, af

terb

urne

r

Lang

e Gr

aphi

cs

(031

-12

71)

22

10.6

N

on-h

eats

et-s

heet

fed

prin

ting,

low

VO

C in

k, 9

0% U

V in

ks,

fugi

tive

emiss

ion

cont

rol

Amer

ican

W

eb

(031

-13

63)

21

10.6

7 He

atse

t w

eb o

ffset

prin

ting,

low

VO

C in

ks,

fugi

tive

emiss

ion

cont

rol,

cata

lytic

con

vert

er

Adam

s M

cclu

re

(031

-17

81)

15

10

Non

-hea

tset

-she

etfe

d an

d he

atse

t w

eb a

nd h

eats

et o

ffset

prin

ting,

low

VO

C in

ks, f

ugiti

ve e

miss

ion

cont

rol

Page 27: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-27

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Colo

rado

requ

irem

ents

CT

G re

com

men

datio

ns

Oth

er

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

for

com

paris

on

Sprin

t Den

ver (

031-

1800

) 12

.5

8.73

N

on-h

eats

et-s

heet

fed

prin

ting,

fugi

tive

emiss

ion

cont

rol

Co

lora

do P

last

icar

d (0

59-

0439

) 35

18

.7

Non

-hea

tset

-she

etfe

d pr

intin

g,

wat

er

base

d in

ks,

fugi

tive

emiss

ion

cont

rol

Citiz

en

Prin

ting

(069

-02

44)

6.32

3.

08

Non

-hea

tset

-she

etfe

d pr

intin

g, l

ow V

OC

ink,

fou

ntai

n so

lutio

n <

5%,

fugi

tive

emiss

ion

cont

rol

Page 28: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-28

Appe

ndix

6-C

(d) –

CTG

s Col

orad

o Co

uld

Cons

ider

Ado

ptin

g –

Indu

stria

l Cle

anin

g So

lven

ts

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Colo

rado

requ

irem

ents

CT

G re

com

men

datio

ns

Oth

er

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

for

com

paris

on

2006

(A

CT

1994

)

Cont

rol

Tech

niqu

es

Guid

elin

es f

or I

ndus

tria

l Cl

eani

ng S

olve

nts

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Wor

k pr

actic

e st

anda

rds,

cl

eani

ng

mat

eria

ls VO

C co

nten

t lim

it 0.

42 lb

/gal

, op

tiona

l al

tern

ativ

e lim

it on

co

mpo

site

vapo

r pr

essu

re

of

clea

ning

m

ater

ials,

ad

d-on

co

ntro

ls em

issio

n re

duct

ion

85%

Calif

orni

a:

clea

ning

so

lven

t VO

C co

nten

t lim

it 0.

21 t

o 6.

7 lb

/gal

, m

ay c

ompl

y w

ith

cont

rol

85-9

5%,

con

sum

er p

aint

thi

nner

VO

C co

nten

t lim

it 0.

21

lb/g

al,

spec

ified

cl

eani

ng m

etho

ds, c

lose

d co

ntai

ners

Te

xas:

sol

vent

VO

C co

nten

t <

0.42

lb/g

al o

r va

por

cont

rol s

yste

m 8

5% r

educ

tion,

clo

sed

cont

aine

rs, m

inim

ize e

miss

ions

Ar

izona

: so

lven

t VO

C co

nten

t <

0.42

lb/g

al,

wor

k pr

actic

es if

not

usin

g lo

w-V

OC

solv

ent

(i.e.

, 0.4

2 lb

/gal

), cl

osed

con

tain

ers

EPA

Men

u: C

TG

RBLC

: va

por

cond

ensin

g/re

cove

ry

syst

em,

oper

atin

g tim

e lim

it

Faci

lity

Perm

itted

VO

C em

issio

ns, t

py

Estim

ated

ac

tual

VO

C em

issio

ns, t

py

Requ

irem

ents

Unk

now

n

VO

C di

spos

al re

quire

men

ts, i

ndus

try

prac

tices

Page 29: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-29

Appe

ndix

6-C

(e) –

CTG

s Col

orad

o Co

uld

Cons

ider

Ado

ptin

g –

Perc

hlor

oeth

ylen

e Dr

y Cl

eani

ng S

yste

ms

Date

of

CTG

Desc

riptio

n Co

lora

do

and

fede

ral r

ules

Date

of

Co

lora

do

adop

tion

Date

of

EP

A ap

prov

al

of

Colo

rado

Re

gula

tion

7

Colo

rado

requ

irem

ents

CT

G re

com

men

datio

ns

Oth

er

requ

irem

ents

or

re

gula

tions

for

com

paris

on

1978

Cont

rol

of

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Em

issio

ns

from

Pe

rchl

oroe

thyl

ene

Dry

Clea

ning

Sy

stem

s EP

A No

te

– Pe

rchl

oroe

thyl

ene

has

been

exe

mpt

ed a

s a

VOC,

so

thi

s CT

G is

no l

onge

r re

leva

nt.

How

ever

, th

ere

is a

NESH

AP

for

perc

hlor

oeth

ylen

e dr

y cle

aner

s.

Regu

latio

n 7

Sect

ion

V.

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

t M

12/1

4/19

78

8/5/

2011

(7

6 FR

474

43)

Cann

ot d

ispos

e of

VO

C by

ev

apor

atio

n or

sp

illag

e un

less

RA

CT

utili

zed

Carb

on

adso

rber

s,

cook

ers

and

cart

ridge

fil

ters

, w

aste

di

spos

al,

leak

det

ectio

n

Calif

orni

a: p

rohi

bits

the

ins

talla

tion

of n

ew

perc

hlor

oeth

ylen

e dr

y cl

eani

ng sy

stem

s

Faci

lity

Estim

ated

ac

tual

pe

rchl

oroe

thyl

ene

emiss

ions

, tp

y Re

quire

men

ts

108

in

ozon

e no

natt

ainm

ent a

rea

72.8

9 So

urce

s sub

ject

to 4

0 CF

R Pa

rt 6

3, S

ubpa

rt M

Page 30: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-30

Appe

ndix

6-D

– A

CT V

OC

sour

ce c

ateg

ory

Date

of

AC

T De

scrip

tion

Oth

er ru

les

Sum

mar

y co

nclu

sion

1983

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues f

or O

rgan

ic E

miss

ions

from

Ply

woo

d Ve

neer

Dry

ers

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

t DDD

D N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

at th

is tim

e –

see

MAC

T

1988

Re

duct

ion

of V

olat

ile O

rgan

ic C

ompo

und

Emiss

ions

fro

m t

he A

pplic

atio

n of

Tr

affic

Mar

king

s N

atio

nal

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Com

poun

d Em

issio

n St

anda

rds f

or A

rchi

tect

ural

Coa

tings

N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at t

his

time

– se

e co

nsum

er

prod

ucts

rule

1989

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Te

chno

logy

Do

cum

ent

– Et

hyle

ne

Oxi

de

Ster

iliza

tion/

Fum

igat

ion

Ope

ratio

ns

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

ts O

, XX,

WW

WW

W

No

furt

her a

ctio

n at

this

time

– se

e M

ACT

1989

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hnol

ogy

Docu

men

t – H

alog

enat

ed S

olve

nt C

lean

ers

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

t T

No

furt

her a

ctio

n at

this

time

– se

e M

ACT

1990

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hnol

ogy

Docu

men

t – O

rgan

ic W

aste

Pro

cess

Ven

ts

N

o ac

tion

at t

his

time

– no

t a

CTG

VOC

sour

ce

cate

gory

1990

Co

ntro

l of V

OC

Emiss

ions

from

Pol

ysty

rene

Foa

m M

anuf

actu

ring

40

CFR

Part

63

Su

bpar

t III

, M

MM

MM

, O

OO

OO

O

No

furt

her a

ctio

n at

this

time

– se

e M

ACT

1992

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hnol

ogy

Docu

men

t – B

aker

y O

vens

No

actio

n at

thi

s tim

e –

not

a CT

G VO

C so

urce

ca

tego

ry

1992

Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues

for

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Com

poun

d Em

issio

ns f

rom

Sta

tiona

ry

Sour

ces

NA

– co

mpi

latio

n of

con

trol

tech

niqu

es

1992

(1

994)

In

dust

rial W

aste

wat

er A

ltern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hnol

ogy

N

o ac

tion

at t

his

time

– no

t a

CTG

VOC

sour

ce

cate

gory

1993

Co

ntro

l of V

OC

Emiss

ions

from

the

Appl

icat

ion

of A

gric

ultu

ral P

estic

ides

No

furt

her

actio

n at

thi

s tim

e –

APCD

doe

s no

t re

gula

te a

gric

ultu

re

1994

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues

Docu

men

t –

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Liq

uid

Stor

age

in

Floa

ting

and

Fixe

d Ro

of T

anks

40

CFR

Par

t 60

Subp

arts

K, K

b N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

at th

is tim

e –

see

CTG,

NSP

S

1994

Co

ntro

l of V

olat

ile O

rgan

ic C

ompo

und

Emiss

ions

from

Bat

ch P

roce

sses

No

actio

n at

thi

s tim

e –

not

a CT

G VO

C so

urce

ca

tego

ry

1994

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues D

ocum

ent –

Indu

stria

l Cle

anin

g So

lven

ts

N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

at th

is tim

e –

see

CTG

1994

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Te

chni

ques

Do

cum

ent

– Su

rfac

e Co

atin

g of

Au

tom

otiv

e/Tr

ansp

orta

tion

and

Busin

ess M

achi

ne P

last

ic P

arts

40

CFR

Par

t 60

Sub

part

TTT

T, 4

0 CF

R Pa

rt 6

3 Su

bpar

t PPP

P N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at t

his

time

– se

e CT

G, N

SPS,

M

ACT

1988

(1

994)

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues D

ocum

ent –

Aut

omob

ile R

efin

ishin

g N

atio

nal

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Com

poun

d Em

issio

n St

anda

rds f

or A

utom

obile

Ref

inish

Coa

tings

N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at t

his

time

– se

e co

nsum

er

prod

ucts

rule

1994

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Te

chni

ques

Doc

umen

t –

Surf

ace

Coat

ing

Ope

ratio

ns a

t Sh

ipbu

ildin

g an

d Sh

ip R

epai

r Fac

ilitie

s 40

CFR

Par

t 63

Subp

art I

I N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

at th

is tim

e –

see

CTG,

MAC

T

1993

(1

994)

Co

ntro

l of

Vol

atile

Org

anic

Com

poun

d Em

issio

ns f

rom

Offs

et L

ithog

raph

ic Pr

intin

g

No

furt

her a

ctio

n at

this

time

– se

e CT

G

Page 31: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-31

Appe

ndix

6-E

– A

CT N

Ox

Sour

ce C

ateg

ory

Date

of

AC

T De

scrip

tion

Oth

er ru

les

Sum

mar

y co

nclu

sion

1991

N

Ox

Emiss

ions

from

Nitr

ic a

nd A

dipi

c Ac

id M

anuf

actu

ring

Plan

ts

40 C

FR P

art 6

0 Su

bpar

ts G

, Ga

No

furt

her a

ctio

n at

this

time

– se

e N

SPS,

MAC

T

1993

N

Ox

Emiss

ions

from

Sta

tiona

ry C

ombu

stio

n Tu

rbin

es

R6.II

(SO

2) &

40

CFR

Part

60

Subp

arts

GG,

KKK

K,

40 C

FR P

art 6

3 Su

bpar

t YYY

Y N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

at th

is tim

e –

see

NSP

S, M

ACT

1993

N

Ox

Emiss

ions

from

Pro

cess

Hea

ters

No

furt

her a

ctio

n at

this

time

– so

urce

by

sour

ce

RACT

per

mitt

ing

anal

ysis

1993

(2

000)

N

Ox

Emiss

ions

from

Sta

tiona

ry In

tern

al C

ombu

stio

n En

gine

s R7

.XVI

, XVI

I & 4

0 CF

R Pa

rt 6

0 Su

bpar

ts II

II, JJ

JJ

No

furt

her a

ctio

n at

this

time

– se

e N

SPS,

MAC

T

1994

(2

000)

N

Ox

Emiss

ions

from

Cem

ent M

anuf

actu

ring

R6.II

I (SO

2) &

40

CFR

Part

60

Subp

art F

, 40

CFR

Part

63

Subp

art L

LL

No

furt

her a

ctio

n at

this

time

– se

e N

SPS,

MAC

T

1994

N

Ox

Emiss

ions

from

Indu

stria

l, Co

mm

erci

al &

Inst

itutio

nal B

oile

rs

R6.II

. (SO

2), V

III (H

g) &

40

CFR

Part

63

Subp

arts

DD

DDD,

JJJJJ

J N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

at th

is tim

e –

see

NSP

S, M

ACT

1994

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues –

NO

x Em

issio

ns fr

om U

tility

Boi

lers

R6

.II.D

(S

O2)

, VI

II (H

g)

&

40

CFR

Part

60

Su

bpar

ts D

, Da,

Db,

Dc,

40

CFR

Part

63

Subp

art

UU

UU

U N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

at th

is tim

e –

see

NSP

S, M

ACT

1994

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues –

NO

x Em

issio

ns fr

om G

lass

Man

ufac

turin

g R6

.III

(SO

2) &

40

CFR

Part

60

Subp

art

CC,

40

CFR

Part

63

Subp

art S

SSSS

S N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

at th

is tim

e –

see

NSP

S, M

ACT

1994

Al

tern

ativ

e Co

ntro

l Tec

hniq

ues –

NO

x Em

issio

ns fr

om Ir

on a

nd S

teel

Mill

s R6

.III (

SO2)

& 4

0 CF

R Pa

rt 6

0 Su

bpar

t AA,

AAa

, N

a, 4

0 CF

R Pa

rt 6

3 Su

bpar

ts C

CC, E

EEEE

, FFF

FF,

ZZZZ

Z N

o fu

rthe

r act

ion

at th

is tim

e –

see

NSP

S, M

ACT

Page 32: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-32

Appe

ndix

6-F

– M

ajor

Sou

rces

of V

OC

and/

or N

Ox

Emis

sion

s in

Colo

rado

Ozo

ne N

onat

tain

men

t Are

a

Pollu

tan

t Fa

cilit

y

AIRS

ID

Faci

lity

purp

ose

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

unco

n (tp

y)

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

actu

al

(tpy)

Maj

or

VOC

or

NO

x em

issio

n po

ints

Re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y co

nclu

sion

SIC:

Pet

role

um R

efin

ing,

Pet

role

um B

ulk

Stat

ions

/Ter

min

als,

Woo

d Ki

tche

n Ca

bine

ts, R

efus

e Sy

stem

s, M

alt B

ever

ages

, Met

al C

ans,

Pho

togr

aphi

c Eq

uipm

ent/

Supp

lies,

Soi

l Pre

p. S

ervi

ces

VOC

SU

NCO

R EN

ERGY

-

DEN

VER

REFI

NER

Y 00

1-00

03

Petr

oleu

m

refin

ing

4840

.14

421.

59

Tank

s,

cold

cl

eane

rs,

was

tew

ater

tr

eatm

ent,

rail

and

truc

k lo

adin

g,

equi

pmen

t lea

ks

Tank

s –

MAC

T CC

, NSP

S Kb

, R7.

III, R

7.VI

, R7.

IV,

NSP

S UU

, MAC

T R;

col

d cl

eane

rs –

R7.

X; c

oolin

g to

wer

s –

MAC

T CC

; cat

alyt

ic r

efor

min

g –

MAC

T U

UU

; w

aste

wat

er

trea

tmen

t –

MAC

T CC

, N

ESHA

P FF

, NSP

S Kb

, NSP

S Q

QQ

; rai

l car

load

ing

– R7

.VI;

truc

k lo

adin

g –

NSP

S XX

, MAC

T GG

GGG,

M

ACT

R, R

7.VI

, gro

undw

ater

tre

atm

ent

– R7

.V;

leak

s – M

ACT

CC, N

SPS

GGG,

R7.

VIII

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x SU

NCO

R EN

ERGY

-

DEN

VER

REFI

NER

Y 00

1-00

03

Petr

oleu

m

refin

ing

576.

932

526.

92

Engi

nes,

hea

ters

Engi

nes

– M

ACT

ZZZZ

, N

SPS

IIII,

NSP

S JJJ

J; pr

oces

s he

ater

– M

ACT

DDDD

D, N

SPS

J, N

SPS

Ja;

sulfu

r re

cove

ry u

nit

– N

SPS

J, M

ACT

UU

U; f

luid

ca

taly

tic c

rack

ing

unit

– N

SPS

J, M

ACT

UU

U

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

VOC

PHIL

LIPS

66

PI

PELI

NE

- DE

NVE

R TE

RMIN

AL

001-

0015

Petr

oleu

m

mar

ketin

g an

d st

orag

e te

rmin

al

1905

.61

127.

27

Tank

s, lo

adin

g ra

ck, t

ank

clea

ning

, eq

uipm

ent

leak

s

Tank

s –

VCU

, NSP

S XX

, NSP

S K,

NSP

S Kb

, MAC

T BB

BBBB

, int

erna

l flo

atin

g ro

of

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

SIN

CLAI

R DE

NVE

R PR

ODU

CTS

TERM

INAL

001-

0019

Petr

oleu

m

prod

ucts

te

rmin

al

107.

9 96

.5

Tank

s,

truc

k an

d ra

il lo

adin

g,

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

Tank

s –

VCU

(2)

, N

SPS

K, N

SPS

Ka,

NSP

S Kb

, M

ACT

BBBB

BB, R

7.III

; tru

ck lo

adin

g –

VCU

, MAC

T BB

BBBB

; fug

itive

VO

C –

MAC

T BB

BBBB

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

ELKA

Y W

OO

D PR

ODU

CTS

COM

PANY

001-

1602

Man

ufac

tur

es

woo

d ca

bine

ts

usin

g va

rious

w

oodw

orki

ng

equi

pmen

t

166.

9 16

6.9

Spra

y bo

oths

, w

ood

wor

king

, coa

tings

Spra

y bo

oths

– P

M fi

lters

; woo

d w

orki

ng a

reas

bagh

ouse

; coa

tings

– M

ACT

JJ VH

AP li

mits

; HVL

P;

fugi

tive

VOC

emiss

ion

cont

rol

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l VO

C co

ntro

ls

VOC

WAS

TE

MAN

AGEM

ENT

OF

COLO

RADO

DE

N AR

AP D

I

005-

1291

Mun

icip

al

solid

was

te

disp

osal

fa

cilit

y

4795

.99

59.8

3 La

ndfil

l gas

La

ndfil

l gas

– fl

are,

NSP

S Cc

N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at th

is tim

e

VOC

MIL

LERC

OO

RS, L

LC -

GOLD

EN B

REW

ERY

059-

0006

Prod

uces

m

alt

beve

rage

s 12

21.9

48

1.02

6 Gr

ain

hand

ling,

fe

rmen

ting/

brew

ing,

bo

ttlin

g, w

aste

wat

er

Ferm

entin

g –

VOC

duct

(bo

ilers

); w

aste

wat

er

trea

tmen

t pl

ant

– su

bmer

ged

fill;

bott

le l

abel

gl

ue –

pol

lutio

n pr

even

tion,

low

VO

C gl

ue; t

anks

no d

etec

tabl

e va

por

loss

, fug

itive

em

issio

ns –

R7

.IX.A

.7

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l VO

C co

ntro

ls

VOC

BALL

M

ETAL

BE

VERA

GE

CON

TAIN

ER C

ORP

059-

0010

Prod

uces

al

umin

um

cans

an

d en

ds

294.

002

126.

955

Boile

rs, c

old

solv

ent p

arts

w

ashe

rs,

coat

ing

syst

ems,

ov

ens,

conv

ersio

n pr

esse

s, e

nd

com

poun

d lin

ers,

sto

rage

Cold

cle

aner

s –

R7.X

.; co

atin

g sy

stem

s –

RTO

, N

SPS

WW

, R7.

IX.C

.; pr

intin

g lin

es –

RTO

; sto

rage

ta

nks –

R7.

III.

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l VO

C co

ntro

ls

Page 33: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-33

Pollu

tan

t Fa

cilit

y

AIRS

ID

Faci

lity

purp

ose

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

unco

n (tp

y)

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

actu

al

(tpy)

Maj

or

VOC

or

NO

x em

issio

n po

ints

Re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y co

nclu

sion

tank

s

VOC

ANHE

USE

R-BU

SCH,

LL

C 06

9-00

60

Prod

uces

m

alt

beve

rage

s 27

1.21

4 27

1.21

4 Br

ewin

g, b

ottle

/can

lin

e,

was

tew

ater

, et

hano

l lo

adou

t

Brew

ing

– ef

ficie

nt p

roce

ss o

pera

tion;

pac

kagi

ng

– po

llutio

n pr

even

tion;

al

coho

l di

still

atio

n –

etha

nol r

ecov

ery,

subm

erge

d fil

l

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l VO

C an

d N

Ox

cont

rols

VOC

EAST

MAN

KO

DAK

CO

123-

0003

Man

ufac

tur

e phot

ogra

phic

supp

lies

2146

.97

45

Chem

ical

man

ufac

turin

g,

ther

mal

m

edia

l m

anuf

actu

ring

Ther

mal

med

ia c

oatin

g lin

es –

RTO

, MAC

T KK

N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at th

is tim

e

NO

x EA

STM

AN

KODA

K CO

12

3-00

03

Man

ufac

tur

e phot

ogra

phic

supp

lies

223

1.8

Boile

rs

Boile

rs –

gas

con

sum

ptio

n lim

it N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at th

is tim

e

VOC

MET

AL

CON

TAIN

ER

CORP

12

3-01

34

Man

ufac

tur

es

the

bodi

es o

f 2

piec

e-al

umin

um

beve

rage

ca

ns

245.

31

245.

31

Can

coat

ing,

cl

eani

ng

solv

ents

Ca

n co

atin

g –

NSP

S W

W,

R7.IX

.C.;

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

– R

7.IX

.A.7

.; cl

eani

ng so

lven

ts –

R7.

X.

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l VO

C co

ntro

ls

VOC

NU

TRI-T

URF

INC

123-

0497

Land

ap

plic

atio

n of

bre

wer

y w

aste

wat

er

4240

10

6 La

nd a

pplic

atio

n La

nd

appl

icat

ion

– ev

apor

atio

n,

vege

tativ

e de

stru

ctio

n

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

STRO

MO

, LL

C -

HUDS

ON

CO

MPO

STIN

G FA

CILI

TY

123-

9AF1

Co

mpo

stin

g 25

6.3

256.

3 Co

mpo

stin

g Co

mpo

stin

g –

best

m

anag

emen

t pr

actic

es

(cov

er)

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

A1

ORG

ANIC

S -

RATT

LER

RIDG

E O

RG R

ECYC

LIN

G

123-

9AEF

Co

mpo

stin

g 23

1.3

231.

3 Co

mpo

stin

g Co

mpo

stin

g –

best

m

anag

emen

t pr

actic

es

(cov

er)

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

SIC:

Ele

ctric

Ser

vice

s, C

emen

t, Gl

ass C

onta

iner

s, C

onst

ruct

ion

Sand

and

Gra

vel,

Stea

m a

nd A

ir-Co

nditi

onin

g Su

pply

, Pho

togr

aphi

c Eq

uipm

ent a

nd S

uppl

ies

NO

x PU

BLIC

SER

VICE

CO

CH

ERO

KEE

PLT3

001-

0001

Elec

tric

ge

nera

ting

faci

lity

5338

.34

5338

.34

2 co

al

fired

bo

ilers

, 3

emer

genc

y di

esel

ge

nera

tors

Boile

rs –

LN

B-O

FA t

hen

shut

dow

n or

con

vers

ion

to g

as; 1

gen

erat

or –

NSP

S III

I, M

ACT

ZZZZ

N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at th

is tim

e

NO

x PU

BLIC

SER

VICE

CO

- V

ALM

ON

T3 01

3-00

01

Elec

tric

ge

nera

ting

faci

lity

4088

.24

2068

.93

Coal

fire

d bo

iler,

gas f

ired

boile

r, ga

s fir

ed t

urbi

ne,

oil

fired

tu

rbin

e,

emer

genc

y di

esel

ge

nera

tor

Coal

boi

ler

– lo

w N

Ox

burn

er a

nd o

ver-

fire

air

then

shu

tdow

n; g

as b

oile

r –

low

NO

x bu

rner

s,

MAC

T DD

DDD;

gen

erat

or –

MAC

T ZZ

ZZ

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x

CEM

EX

CON

STRU

CTIO

N

MAT

ERIA

LS

- LY

ON

S3

013-

0003

Man

ufac

tur

ers

Port

land

ce

men

t

1050

.82

1050

.82

Raw

mat

eria

l dry

er, k

iln

Drye

r –

oper

atio

n as

des

igne

d, M

ACT

LLL;

kiln

fuel

con

sum

ptio

n, M

ACT

LLL

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

Page 34: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-34

Pollu

tan

t Fa

cilit

y

AIRS

ID

Faci

lity

purp

ose

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

unco

n (tp

y)

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

actu

al

(tpy)

Maj

or

VOC

or

NO

x em

issio

n po

ints

Re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y co

nclu

sion

NO

x U

NIV

O

F CO

LO

BOU

LDER

- P

OW

ER

HOU

SE

013-

0553

Elec

tric

ity

and

stea

m

gene

ratio

n 15

8.52

95

.62

2 ga

s/oi

l fire

d tu

rbin

es, 2

st

andb

y ga

s/oi

l ba

ckup

bo

ilers

Turb

ines

– f

uel

cons

umpt

ion,

NSP

S GG

, st

eam

in

ject

ion

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x PU

BLIC

SER

VICE

CO

DE

NVE

R ST

EAM

PLT

03

1-00

41

Indu

stria

l st

eam

bo

ilers

18

1.87

18

1.87

2

prim

arily

ga

s fir

ed

stea

m b

oile

rs

Boile

rs –

fuel

con

sum

ptio

n N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at th

is tim

e

NO

x RO

CKY

MO

UN

TAIN

BO

TTLE

CO

05

9-00

08

Prod

uces

co

ntai

ner

glas

s 35

1.75

35

1.75

3

glas

s mel

t fur

nace

s Fu

rnac

es –

gla

ss p

rodu

ctio

n lim

it

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

NO

x TE

XAS

IND

(TXI

) O

PERA

TIO

NS

DBA

WES

TERN

A

059-

0409

Sh

ale

quar

ry

117.

65

117.

65

Rota

ry

kiln

, di

esel

em

erge

ncy

gene

rato

r Ki

ln –

fuel

usa

ge, N

SPS

UU

U; g

ener

ator

– M

ACT

ZZZZ

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

NO

x CO

LORA

DO-

GOLD

EN

ENER

GY

CORP

ORA

TIO

N18

059-

0820

Elec

tric

ity

and

stea

m

gene

ratio

n 63

6.52

5 63

6.52

5

2 ga

s/oi

l fir

ed

boile

rs,

coal

fir

ed

boile

r, 2

coal

/gas

/eth

ane

fired

bo

ilers

Coal

boi

ler

– ba

ghou

se;

coal

/eth

anol

boi

lers

bagh

ouse

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

NO

x PL

AIN

S EN

D, L

LC

059-

0864

Elec

tric

ge

nera

ting

faci

lity

140.

991

26.2

87

34

gas

fired

in

tern

al

com

bust

ion

engi

nes,

em

erge

ncy

engi

nes

Engi

nes

– SC

R,

MAC

T ZZ

ZZ

or

N

SPS

JJJJ;

emer

genc

y en

gine

– M

ACT

ZZZZ

or N

SPS

IIII

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x CO

LORA

DO

STAT

E U

NIV

CS

U F

ACIL

ITY

SVCS

069-

0011

Elec

tric

ity

and

stea

m

gene

ratio

n 12

3.37

9 12

3.37

9

3 ga

s/oi

l fir

ed

boile

rs,

stea

m tu

rbin

e, 2

gas

fire

d bo

ilers

, em

erge

ncy

gene

rato

rs

Boile

rs –

fue

l co

nsum

ptio

n; g

as b

oile

rs –

fuel

co

nsum

ptio

n, N

SPS

Dc; g

ener

ator

s –

NSP

S III

I or

NSP

S JJJ

J

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

NO

x PL

ATTE

RI

VER

POW

ER A

UTH

ORI

TY

- RAW

HIDE

3

069-

0053

Elec

tric

ge

nera

ting

faci

lity

4717

.88

1419

.87

Coal

boi

ler,

5 ga

s fir

ed

simpl

e cy

cle

com

bust

ion

turb

ines

Boile

r -

LNC3

lo

w-N

OX

com

bust

ion

cont

rol

syst

em w

ith se

para

ted

over

-fire

-air

a

nd a

low

NO

X co

ncen

tric

firin

g bu

rner

; tur

bine

s –

dry

low

NO

x co

mbu

stio

n sy

stem

s

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x PU

BLIC

SER

VICE

CO

FO

RT S

AINT

VRA

IN

PLT

123-

0023

Elec

tric

ge

nera

ting

faci

lity

1237

.94

391.

34

5 ga

s co

mbu

stio

n tu

rbin

es,

heat

re

cove

ry

stea

m

gene

rato

rs,

auxi

liary

bo

iler,

emer

genc

y di

esel

ge

nera

tors

Turb

ines

– d

ry lo

w N

Ox

burn

ers;

hea

t re

cove

ry

gene

rato

rs –

SCR

; boi

ler –

gas

con

sum

ptio

n lim

it;

gene

rato

r – M

ACT

ZZZZ

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x TH

ERM

O P

OW

ER &

EL

EC IN

C 12

3-01

26

Coge

nera

tion

of

el

ectr

icity

an

d st

eam

350

70

5 co

mbu

stio

n tu

rbin

es, 2

em

erge

ncy

dies

el

engi

nes

Turb

ines

– s

team

inje

ctio

n, 1

-3 re

tired

; eng

ines

MAC

T ZZ

ZZ

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

NO

x TH

ERM

O

COGE

N PA

RTNE

RSHI

P -

JM

123-

0250

Co

gene

rati

on

of

281.

9723

28

1.97

23

5 co

mbu

stio

n tu

rbin

es, 2

em

erge

ncy

dies

el

Turb

ines

– st

eam

inje

ctio

n; e

ngin

es –

MAC

T ZZ

ZZ

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

18 S

ubje

ct to

Reg

iona

l Haz

e B

AR

T or

Rea

sona

ble

Prog

ress

det

erm

inat

ion,

app

rove

d by

EPA

Dec

embe

r 31,

201

2 (7

7 Fe

d. R

eg. 7

6871

).

Page 35: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-35

Pollu

tan

t Fa

cilit

y

AIRS

ID

Faci

lity

purp

ose

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

unco

n (tp

y)

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

actu

al

(tpy)

Maj

or

VOC

or

NO

x em

issio

n po

ints

Re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y co

nclu

sion

SHAF

ER

elec

tric

ity

and

stea

m

engi

nes

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

NO

x O

WEN

S-BR

OCK

WAY

GL

ASS

- TU

MBL

EWEE

D

123-

4406

Glas

s co

ntai

ner

man

ufac

tur

ing

faci

lity

231.

8662

23

1.86

62

2 gl

ass

mel

ting

furn

aces

, di

esel

eng

ine

Furn

aces

glas

s pr

oduc

tion

and

NO

x lim

it;

engi

ne –

NSP

S III

I

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

NO

x SP

INDL

E HI

LL

ENER

GY, L

LC

123-

5468

Peak

ing

utili

ty

elec

tric

po

wer

ge

nera

tion

faci

lity

118.

69

118.

69

2 co

mbu

stio

n tu

rbin

es,

gas h

eate

r, di

esel

eng

ine

Turb

ines

– d

ry lo

w N

Ox

com

bust

ion

syst

em a

nd

wat

er in

ject

ion,

NSP

S KK

KK;

gas

heat

er –

NSP

S Dc

; die

sel e

ngin

e –

MAC

T ZZ

ZZ, N

SPS

IIII

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x CA

REST

REAM

HE

ALTH

, IN

C 12

3-63

50

Phot

ogra

phic

su

pplie

s m

anuf

actu

rer

133

133

Boile

rs

Boile

rs fu

el c

onsu

mpt

ion

limit

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

SIC:

Nat

ural

Gas

Tra

nsm

issio

n, C

rude

Pet

role

um a

nd N

atur

al G

as, N

atur

al G

as L

iqui

ds

NO

x CO

LORA

DO

INTE

RSTA

TE G

AS C

O

- LAT

IGO

C.S

.

005-

0055

Co

mpr

esso

r sta

tion

174.

87

174.

87

5 ga

s fir

ed

engi

nes,

dehy

drat

ion

unit,

pro

cess

he

ater

Engi

nes

– fu

el c

onsu

mpt

ion,

4-R

7.XV

II.E.

3. c

ost

anal

ysis,

MAC

T ZZ

ZZ;

proc

ess

heat

er –

MAC

T DD

DDD;

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

LDA

R

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

NO

x CO

LORA

DO

INTE

RSTA

TE G

AS C

O

WAT

KINS

C.S

.

001-

0036

Co

mpr

esso

r sta

tion

398.

5 39

8.5

11

gas

fired

en

gine

s, pr

oces

s hea

ters

En

gine

s –

6-R7

.XVI

I.E.3

. co

st a

naly

sis;

proc

ess

heat

er –

MAC

T DD

DDD;

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

LDA

R

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

VOC

DCP

MID

STRE

AM L

P - E

NTE

RPRI

SE C

.S.

123-

0277

Co

mpr

esso

r sta

tion

115.

83

115.

83

6 ga

s fire

d en

gine

s, 2

TEG

de

hydr

atio

n un

its,

8 co

nden

sate

stor

age

tank

s

Engi

nes

– ox

idat

ion

cata

lyst

, N

SPS

JJJJ,

MAC

T ZZ

ZZ; d

ehy

– fla

re; t

anks

– e

nclo

sed

com

bust

or;

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

LDA

R

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

DCP

MID

STRE

AM,

LP -

GRE

ELEY

GAS

PL

ANT

123-

0099

N

atur

al g

as

proc

essin

g pl

ant

295.

21

83.5

5 Ga

s pr

oces

sing

skid

, st

orag

e ta

nks,

TE

G de

hydr

atio

n un

it,

EG

dehy

drat

ion

unit,

8

engi

nes,

oil

heat

ers

Skid

and

fra

ctio

natio

n to

wer

s –

NSP

S KK

K; t

ank

and

liqui

d lo

adou

t –

VRU

; en

gine

s –

NSC

R,

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

LDA

R

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 12

3-00

99

251.

98

185.

398

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

DCP

MID

STRE

AM,

LP -

MAR

LA C

.S.

123-

0243

Co

mpr

esso

r sta

tion

500.

51

88.7

129

6 ga

s fire

d en

gine

s, 2

TEG

de

hydr

atio

n un

its,

fugi

tive

VOC

leak

s

Engi

nes

– N

SCR;

deh

y un

its –

con

dens

er a

nd

flare

, fug

itive

em

issio

ns L

DAR

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 12

3-02

43

178.

81

178.

81

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

DCP

MID

STRE

AM,

LP

- PL

ATTE

VILL

E GP

P

123-

0595

N

atur

al g

as

proc

essin

g pl

ant

181.

49

152.

136

Gas

proc

essin

g sk

id,

EG

dehy

drat

ion

unit,

3

stor

age

tank

s, 9

eng

ines

, ho

t oi

l he

ater

, fu

gitiv

e VO

C

Engi

nes

– N

SCR,

MAC

T ZZ

ZZ,

NSP

S JJJ

J; ho

t oi

l he

ater

– g

as c

onsu

mpt

ion;

deh

y –

vent

ed b

ack

into

pro

cess

; fug

itive

em

issio

ns L

DAR

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 12

3-05

95

565.

15

233.

773

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

DCP

MID

STRE

AM,

LP -

ROGG

EN N

GPP

123-

0049

N

atur

al g

as

proc

essin

g 25

11.3

5 19

1.25

8 12

eng

ines

, 2

heat

ers,

3

cryo

geni

c pl

ant

skid

s,

Engi

nes

– ai

r/fu

el

ratio

co

ntro

ller,

cata

lyst

; pr

opan

e tr

uck

blow

dow

n –

flare

; de

prop

anize

r N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at th

is tim

e

Page 36: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-36

Pollu

tan

t Fa

cilit

y

AIRS

ID

Faci

lity

purp

ose

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

unco

n (tp

y)

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

actu

al

(tpy)

Maj

or

VOC

or

NO

x em

issio

n po

ints

Re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y co

nclu

sion

NO

x 12

3-00

49

plan

t

959.

694

205.

09

frac

tiona

tor

plan

t, co

nden

sate

lo

adou

t, st

orag

e ta

nks

heat

er –

fue

l co

nsum

ptio

n; f

ugiti

ve e

miss

ions

LD

AR

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

DCP

MID

STRE

AM,

LP

- SP

INDL

E GA

S PL

ANT

123-

0015

N

atur

al g

as

proc

essin

g pl

ant

361.

758

134.

397

12

engi

nes,

TEG

dehy

drat

ion

unit,

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

, gas

pro

cess

ing

skid

, ho

t oi

l he

ater

, co

nden

sate

load

out

rack

, 4

stor

age

tank

s

Fugi

tive

emiss

ions

– N

SPS

KKK;

eng

ines

– N

SCR,

ox

idat

ion

cata

lyst

, MAC

T ZZ

ZZ; d

ehy

– co

nden

ser

rebo

iler/

flare

; hot

oil

heat

er –

fuel

con

sum

ptio

n;

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

LDA

R

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 12

3-00

15

284.

292

28

4.29

2 N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at th

is tim

e

VOC

DCP

MID

STRE

AM,

LP- L

UCER

NE

123-

0107

N

atur

al g

as

proc

essin

g pl

ant

157.

981

84.7

656

10 e

ngin

es,

rege

nera

tion

boile

r, fu

gitiv

e em

issio

ns

Engi

nes –

NSC

R; fu

gitiv

e em

issio

ns L

DAR

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 12

3-01

07

345.

862

135.

528

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

DCP

MID

STRE

AM,

LP- M

EWBO

URN

123-

0090

N

atur

al g

as

proc

essin

g pl

ant

961.

08

110.

197

15

engi

nes,

EG

de

hydr

atio

n un

it, h

ot o

il he

ater

, st

abili

zed

cond

ensa

te

truc

k lo

ad-

out

rack

, 4

stab

ilize

d co

nden

sate

stor

age

tank

s

Engi

nes

– N

SCR,

MAC

T ZZ

ZZ,

NSP

S JJJ

J; ho

t oi

l he

ater

– N

SPS

Dc; f

ugiti

ve e

miss

ions

LDA

R

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 12

3-00

90

267.

764

90.1

387

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

VOC

KERR

-MCG

EE

GATH

ERIN

G -

FRED

ERIC

K CS

123-

0184

Co

mpr

esso

r sta

tion

652.

648

88.9

771

3 en

gine

s,

TEG

dehy

drat

ion

unit,

sto

rage

ta

nks,

fugi

tive

VOC

Dehy

– t

herm

al o

xidi

zer

unit;

tan

ks –

fla

re;

1 en

gine

– o

xidi

zing

cata

lyst

, MAC

T ZZ

ZZ; f

ugiti

ve

emiss

ions

LDA

R

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 12

3-01

84

220.

921

109.

461

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

VOC

KERR

-MCG

EE

Huds

on S

tatio

n

123-

0048

Co

mpr

esso

r sta

tion

471.

5 84

.821

6 7

engi

nes,

2

TEG

dehy

drat

ion

units

, co

nden

sate

sto

rage

tan

k ba

tter

y, fu

gitiv

e VO

C

3 en

gine

s –

NSC

R; d

ehys

– f

lare

; ta

nks

– fla

re;

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

LDA

R

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 12

3-00

48

273.

205

273.

205

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

VOC

KMCG

EE

FT

LUPT

ON

/PLA

TTE

VALL

EY/L

ANCA

STER

123-

0057

Co

mpr

esso

r sta

tion

2109

.48

232.

654

7 en

gine

s,

TEG

dehy

drat

ion

unit,

fugi

tive

VOC

3 en

gine

s – N

SCR;

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

LDA

R

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 12

3-00

57

281.

997

281.

997

Anal

yzin

g po

tent

ial

addi

tiona

l N

Ox

cont

rols

VOC

WGR

AS

SET

HOLD

ING

CO

- W

ATTE

NBE

RG

PLAN

T

001-

0025

N

atur

al g

as

proc

essin

g pl

ant

165.

949

157.

289

5 en

gine

s, h

ot o

il he

ater

, re

gene

ratio

n he

ater

s, g

as

turb

ine,

load

out,

fugi

tive

VOC,

stor

age

vess

el

Engi

nes

– ox

idat

ion

cata

lyst

, R7

.XVI

I.E.3

. co

st

anal

ysis;

hot

oil

and

rege

nera

tion

heat

ers

and

stea

m b

oile

r –

fuel

con

sum

ptio

n; t

urbi

ne –

fue

l co

nsum

ptio

n, N

SPS

GG;

load

out

to l

eak

tight

tr

ucks

; fug

itive

em

issio

ns L

DAR;

deh

y –

ther

mal

ox

idize

r; ta

nks –

MAC

T HH

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x 00

1-00

25

691.

487

691.

487

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

Page 37: CHAPTER 6 REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) ANALYSIS · 2016-09-28 · x Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment (EPA 1978) x Control

DRAF

T –

APRI

L 20

16

2017

Den

ver M

etro

/Nor

th F

ront

Ran

ge 2

008

8-Ho

ur O

zone

Sta

ndar

d SI

P

P

age

6-37

Pollu

tan

t Fa

cilit

y

AIRS

ID

Faci

lity

purp

ose

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

unco

n (tp

y)

Estim

ated

em

issio

ns,

actu

al

(tpy)

Maj

or

VOC

or

NO

x em

issio

n po

ints

Re

quire

men

ts

Sum

mar

y co

nclu

sion

NO

x CO

LORA

DO

INTE

RSTA

TE G

AS C

O

CHEY

ENNE

STN

123-

0051

Co

mpr

esso

r sta

tion

146.

289

146.

289

11 e

ngin

es

Engi

nes

– ox

idat

ion

cata

lyst

, R7

.XVI

I.E.3

. co

st

anal

ysis;

tur

bine

– d

ry l

ow N

Ox

com

bust

ion

syst

em, M

ACT

ZZZZ

; fug

itive

em

issio

ns L

DAR

No

furt

her

actio

n at

this

time

NO

x SO

UTH

ERN

ST

AR

CEN

TRAL

GA

S PI

PELI

NE

CHEY

E

123-

0078

Co

mpr

esso

r sta

tion

201.

2 20

1.2

Engi

ne,

emer

genc

y ge

nera

tor

Engi

nes

– M

ACT

ZZZZ

, R7.

XVII.

E.3.

cos

t an

alys

is;

fugi

tive

emiss

ions

LDA

R N

o fu

rthe

r ac

tion

at th

is tim

e