Upload File

chapter 8 - recommendations final updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other...

  • Home
  • Documents
  • Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to
95
OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY 8‐1 8 System Recommendations Introduction Previous chapters of this study evaluated FAA compliance factors and performance measures related to recommended facility objectives as well as the geographic and population coverage afforded by each airport in the system based on their defined role (Air Carrier, Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level 4). Ohio has an excellent system of airports that provide and exceptional mix of facilities that provide good geographic coverage to all categories of aviation. Using the information presented in previous chapters, this chapter provides recommendations to improve the adequacy of the state’s airports at the functional level, as well as the entire system. Chapter 5, Airport Classifications and Facility Objectives, defined and evaluated facility objectives for each system airport. Chapter 6, Airport Compliance Evaluation, evaluated each airport’s compliance with key FAA requirements and guidelines to indicate resources necessary to bring facilities into full compliance. Chapter 7, Regional Needs and Capacity Analysis, evaluated the capacity of the system to meet existing and future needs in order to facilitate both day‐to‐day and long‐term decision making with regards to matters of legislation, policy, and funding. Voids in the facilities and services provided, geographic coverage, and compliance factors serve as the basis for determining recommendations for enhancing the future system of airports and thereby improving the performance of the system. This chapter will identify airport and system deficiencies and provide recommendations to meet performance targets through the following sections: Section 1: Recommendations Relating to Compliance Factors Section 2: Recommendations Relating to Performance Benchmarks Section 3: Ohio Airport Funding Conclusion Section 1: Recommendations Related to Compliance Factors Chapter 6 of The Ohio Airports Focus Study, Airport Compliance Evaluation, presented the level to which general aviation airports in the Ohio system meet several compliance factors. These factors are often tied to an airport’s grant assurances through Order 5190.6B, the FAA Airport Compliance Manual, and Grant Assurances Airport Sponsors. Accepting federal funding for the development or operation of a public airport, it enters into a contractual obligation with the FAA. Chapter 6 detailed compliance as it relates to airport lease standards, through‐the‐fence conditions, land use compatibility, local commitment, primary runway safety areas (RSAs), primary runway protection zones (RPZs), and pavement maintenance of the primary runway and other pavements. While airports in Ohio are urged to maintain or work towards compliance with all of these factors, this chapter only makes recommendations that are easily quantified through an estimated cost to meet compliance. Therefore, recommendations are made for the following compliance factors: Primary RSAs Primary RPZs Pavement maintenance Recommendations and estimated costs for each of these compliance factors are presented in the following sections. Methodologies for arriving at these costs vary depending on the compliance factor. In addition, recommendations for RSA and RPZ compliance issues are one‐time projects,

Upload: others

Post on 29-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

 OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐1

8SystemRecommendations

Introduction PreviouschaptersofthisstudyevaluatedFAAcompliancefactorsandperformancemeasuresrelatedtorecommendedfacilityobjectivesaswellasthegeographicandpopulationcoverageaffordedbyeachairportinthesystembasedontheirdefinedrole(AirCarrier,Level1,Level2,Level3,Level4).Ohiohasanexcellentsystemofairportsthatprovideandexceptionalmixoffacilitiesthatprovidegoodgeographiccoveragetoallcategoriesofaviation.

Usingtheinformationpresentedinpreviouschapters,thischapterprovidesrecommendationstoimprovetheadequacyofthestate’sairportsatthefunctionallevel,aswellastheentiresystem.Chapter5,AirportClassificationsandFacilityObjectives,definedandevaluatedfacilityobjectivesforeachsystemairport.Chapter6,AirportComplianceEvaluation,evaluatedeachairport’scompliancewithkeyFAArequirementsandguidelinestoindicateresourcesnecessarytobringfacilitiesintofullcompliance.Chapter7,RegionalNeedsandCapacityAnalysis,evaluatedthecapacityofthesystemtomeetexistingandfutureneedsinordertofacilitatebothday‐to‐dayandlong‐termdecisionmakingwithregardstomattersoflegislation,policy,andfunding.Voidsinthefacilitiesandservicesprovided,geographiccoverage,andcompliancefactorsserveasthebasisfordeterminingrecommendationsforenhancingthefuturesystemofairportsandtherebyimprovingtheperformanceofthesystem.

Thischapterwillidentifyairportandsystemdeficienciesandproviderecommendationstomeetperformancetargetsthroughthefollowingsections:

Section1:RecommendationsRelatingtoComplianceFactors Section2:RecommendationsRelatingtoPerformanceBenchmarks Section3:OhioAirportFunding Conclusion

Section 1: Recommendations Related to Compliance Factors Chapter6ofTheOhioAirportsFocusStudy,AirportComplianceEvaluation,presentedtheleveltowhichgeneralaviationairportsintheOhiosystemmeetseveralcompliancefactors.Thesefactorsareoftentiedtoanairport’sgrantassurancesthroughOrder5190.6B,theFAAAirportComplianceManual,andGrantAssurancesAirportSponsors.Acceptingfederalfundingforthedevelopmentoroperationofapublicairport,itentersintoacontractualobligationwiththeFAA.Chapter6detailedcomplianceasitrelatestoairportleasestandards,through‐the‐fenceconditions,landusecompatibility,localcommitment,primaryrunwaysafetyareas(RSAs),primaryrunwayprotectionzones(RPZs),andpavementmaintenanceoftheprimaryrunwayandotherpavements.

WhileairportsinOhioareurgedtomaintainorworktowardscompliancewithallofthesefactors,thischapteronlymakesrecommendationsthatareeasilyquantifiedthroughanestimatedcosttomeetcompliance.Therefore,recommendationsaremadeforthefollowingcompliancefactors:

PrimaryRSAs PrimaryRPZs Pavementmaintenance

Recommendationsandestimatedcostsforeachofthesecompliancefactorsarepresentedinthefollowingsections.Methodologiesforarrivingatthesecostsvarydependingonthecompliancefactor.Inaddition,recommendationsforRSAandRPZcomplianceissuesareone‐timeprojects,

Page 2: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014   

    

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐2

whilethosepresentedforpavementmaintenancearepresentedoverfive,10,and20yearperiodstoensureongoingpavementmaintenance.

Therecommendationsandcostestimatespresentedinthissectionareplanninglevel,andarenotmeanttoreplacedetailedengineeringstudiesortosupersedeworkdoneasaresultofairportmasterplansorpavementmaintenanceplans.

Recommendations Related to RSA Corrective Options TheRSAisasurfacesurroundingarunwaydesignedtoreducedamagetoaircraftintheeventofanundershoot,overshoot,orexcursionfromtherunway.Chapter6ofthisstudydetailedRSAdesign,dimensions(basedonRunwayDesignCode),andprimaryRSAcomplianceatgeneralaviationairportsintheOhiosystem.Compliancewasdeterminedusingseveraldatasources,includingtheAirportInventoryandDataSurvey,airportlayoutplans,inspectionlettersprovidedbyODOT,andremotesensingofsatelliteimagery.Issuessuchasroadways,impropergrading,vegetation,andbuiltstructurescaused30generalaviationairportsintheOhiosystemtohavenonconformingRSAsontheirprimaryrunways.

ThefollowingsectionpresentsoptionstoresolveRSAnoncomplianceatthese30airports.MultipleoptionswereexploredtobringRSAsintocompliance:physicalalterationtosolvetheRSAissues,theimplementationofdeclareddistances,andotheroptionssuchasengineeredmaterialsarrestorsystem(EMAS),asystemdesignedtoabsorbtheweightofanaircraftintheeventofoverrun.Insomecases,acombinationofconstructionanddeclareddistancesisnecessary.Inothercases,onlyoneoptionisfeasible.

PhysicalalterationoftheRSAandairportenvironsistypicallyfarmoreexpensivethanmerelyimplementingdeclareddistances.Inaddition,physicalalterationthroughconstructionandtheresultingcostsvarybetweenairportsdependingontheindividualRSAissue.CommonconstructionprojectsincludetherelocationofNAVAIDsthatexistwithintheRSA,relocatingroads,gradingtheRSA,orclearingvegetation.SomephysicalRSAissuescannotbesolvedinapracticalmanner.Insuchcases,anysolutionwouldbeconsideredanincrementalimprovement.

BasedontheestimatedcostsrequiredtoremedyRSAcomplianceissuesthroughcapitalimprovementprojectsandthelimitedfundingavailabletoenacttheseprojects,alternativemethodssuchasdeclareddistancesandEMASwereconsidered.Generally,theseoptionsresultinareducedoverallusablerunwaylengthrelatedtotheaffectedoperationassociatedwiththenon‐compliantissue,butmaintainanoverallgreateroperationalabilitythansimplyreducingarunwaylengthtoaccommodatetheRSAnoncomplianceissue.

Declareddistancesrepresentthemaximumdistancesavailableandsuitableformeetingtakeoff,rejectedtakeoff,andlandingdistancesperformancerequirements.Thesedistancesareasfollows:

TakeoffRunAvailable(TORA)–Appliestotakeoff TakeoffDistanceAvailable(TODA)–Appliestotakeoff AccelerateStopDistanceAvailable(ASDA)–Appliestoarejectedtakeoff LandingDistanceAvailable(LDA)–Appliestolanding

Declareddistancesrepresentthemaximumdistancesavailableandsuitableformeetingtakeoff,rejectedtakeoff,andlandingdistancesperformancerequirements.DeclareddistancesmaybeusedasanincrementalimprovementtoobtainadditionalRSAand/orrunwayobjectfreearea(ROFA)priortotherunway’sthresholdand/orbeyondthestopendoftherunway,tomitigate

Page 3: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014   

    

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐3

unacceptableincompatiblelandusesintheRPZ,ortomeetrunwayapproach/departuresurfacerequirements.DeclareddistancedatawasnotanalyzedifitdidnotdirectlypertaintoRSAcompliance.

Forsomeairports,theimplementationofdeclareddistancesistheonlypossibleoption,whileforothers,thebestoptionmaybeacombinationofbothalterationprojectsanddeclareddistances.TheoptionspresenteddonotrepresenttheonlypracticalsolutionsforRSAcompliance.Additionally,thedeclareddistancespresentedareestimatedvaluesforplanningpurposesonly.TheyonlyconsiderRSAstandardsaloneanddonottakeintoaccountanyotherplanningoroperationalconsiderations.Theseoptionsandcostsaremerelyestimates,anddonotclaimtheaccuracyofanengineeringstudyorairportmasterplan.

Table8‐1summarizestheestimatedcoststobringprimaryRSAsintocompliance.

Table8‐1SummaryofCoststoBringPrimaryRSAsintoCompliance

Airport Classification 

Recommendation Option 

Option 1  Option 2* 

GA Level 1  $28,069,000  $3,661,000  

GA Level 2  $7,629,000  $617,000  

GA Level 3  $4,290,000  $924,000  

GA Level 4  $1,677,000  $1,170,000  

System Total  $41,665,000  $6,372,000  

*For airports with no second option, this cost includes Option 1 Source: Airport Inventory and Data Survey, RS&H 

Option1representsthebestoptionforresolvingRSAissuesattheseOhiosystemairports,albeitoftenatafargreatercostthanmerelyimplementingdeclareddistances.UnderOption1,manyairportsarerecommendedtoundergomajorconstructionprojectstoresolveRSAissuesontheirprimaryrunways.Thesystem‐wideestimatedcosttoimplementOption1isover$41.6million.

Option2representsasecondoptionforseveralairports,andtypicallyinvolvestheimplementationofdeclareddistances.ThisOptionisoftenfarlessexpensivetoimplementthanOption1,butalsoresultsinlessuseablerunwaylengthinmanycases.ThetotalestimatedcostofOption2,whenincludingOption1costsatairportsforwhichonlyoneoptionispresented,isover$6.3million.

AllRSAcompliancerecommendationsaremeanttobringprimaryRSAsintocompliancewitheachairport’scurrentRDC/ARC,anddonotaccountforARCupgraderecommendationsmadeelsewhereinthisstudy.

Table8‐2presentsdetailedoptionsforthe30airportswithanonconformingprimaryRSA.

Page 4: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐4 

Table8‐2CorrectiveActionOptionsonPrimaryRSAs,withEstimatedCosts

Associated City  Airport Name  Corrective Action Option 1 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate  Corrective Action Option 2 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate 

GA Level 1                      

Akron Akron Fulton International** 

• Demo existing railroad • Modify existing railroad tracks • Road repairs (Exeter Road) • Install new railroad • Relocate existing NAVAIDS • Grading, seeding, mulching 

Runway 07 ASDA = 6,336 Runway 07 LDA = 5,578 Runway 25 ASDA = 6,336 Runway 25 LDA = 6,064  $3,526,000   • Declared distances 

Runway 07 ASDA = 6,336 Runway 07 LDA = 5,578 Runway 25 ASDA = 5,428 Runway 25 LDA = 5,158  $5,000  

Ashtabula Northeast Ohio Regional 

• Relocate ditches • Clearing and grubbing • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 09 ASDA = 5,197 Runway 09 LDA = 5,197 Runway 27 ASDA = 5,197 Runway 27 LDA = 5,197  $1,512,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Cincinnati 

Cincinnati Municipal‐Lunken Field 

• Relocate access road for localizer  • Remove existing access road • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 03R ASDA = 6,101 Runway 03R LDA = 6,101 Runway 21L ASDA = 6,101 Runway 21L LDA = 6,101  $350,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Cleveland  Cuyahoga County 

• Construct EMAS Runway 24 • Demo/construct TWY connector • Electrical demo/modifications • Pavement re‐marking • Relocate NAVAIDS • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 06 ASDA = 4,822 Runway 06 LDA = 4,822  Runway 24 ASDA = 4,822  Runway 24 LDA = 4,822  $12,217,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 24 Threshold 280 ft. SW • Marking/electrical modifications 

Runway 06 ASDA = 4,422 Runway 06 LDA = 4,422 Runway 24 ASDA = 5,102 Runway 24 LDA = 4,822  $274,000  

Page 5: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐5 

Table8‐2CorrectiveActionOptionsonPrimaryRSAs,withEstimatedCosts

Associated City  Airport Name  Corrective Action Option 1 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate  Corrective Action Option 2 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate 

Dayton Dayton‐Wright Brothers** 

• Construct EMAS Runway 20 • Electrical demo/modifications • Pavement re‐marking • Relocate NAVAIDS • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 02 ASDA = 5,000 Runway 02 LDA = 5,000 Runway 20 ASDA = 5,000 Runway 20 LDA = 4,409  $8,694,000   • Declared distances 

Runway 02 ASDA = 4,550 Runway 02 LDA = 4,550 Runway 20 ASDA = 5,000 Runway 20 LDA = 4,409  $5,000  

Lima  Lima Allen County • Prohibit agricultural uses in RSA 

Runway 10 ASDA = 6,000 Runway 10 LDA = 6,000 Runway 28 ASDA = 6,000 Runway 28 LDA = 6,000  $0   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Mansfield Mansfield Lahm Regional 

• Relocate access road for localizer  • Remove existing access road • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 14 ASDA = 9,001 Runway 14 LDA = 9,001 Runway 32 ASDA = 9,001 Runway 32 LDA = 9,001  $313,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Marion  Marion Municipal 

• Prohibit agricultural uses in RSA • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 07 ASDA = 5,000 Runway 07 LDA = 5,000 Runway 25 ASDA = 5,000 Runway 25 LDA = 5,000  $80,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Middletown 

Middletown Regional/Hook Field** 

• Remove/fill pond • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 05 ASDA = 6,100 Runway 05 LDA = 6,100 Runway 23 ASDA = 6,100 Runway 23 LDA = 5,790  $204,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 05 threshold 100 ft. NE • Marking/electrical modifications 

Runway 05 ASDA = 6,100 Runway 05 LDA = 6,000 Runway 23 ASDA = 6,000  Runway 23 LDA = 5,690  $274,000  

Portsmouth Greater Portsmouth Regional 

• Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 18 ASDA = 5,001 Runway 18 LDA = 5,001 Runway 36 ASDA = 5,001 Runway 36 LDA = 5,001  $346,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Page 6: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐6 

Table8‐2CorrectiveActionOptionsonPrimaryRSAs,withEstimatedCosts

Associated City  Airport Name  Corrective Action Option 1 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate  Corrective Action Option 2 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate 

Wilmington Wilmington Air Park* 

• Relocate access road for ALSF‐2 • Remove existing access road • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 04L ASDA = 10,701Runway 04L LDA = 10,701 Runway 22R ASDA = 10,701Runway 22R LDA = 10,701  $228,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Wooster  Wayne County** 

• Land acquisition • Relocate Geyers Chapel Road • Grading, seeding, and mulching • Declared distances 

Runway 10 ASDA = 5,045 Runway 10 LDA = 5,045 Runway 28 ASDA = 5,190 Runway 28 LDA = 4,960  $599,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 10 threshold 210 ft. NE • Marking/electrical modifications 

Runway 10 ASDA = 5,045 Runway 10 LDA = 4,840 Runway 28 ASDA = 4,980 Runway 28 LDA = 4,750  $274,000  

GA Level 2                      

Jackson  James A. Rhodes** 

• Clearing and grubbing • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 01 ASDA = 5,201 Runway 01 LDA = 4,861 Runway 19 ASDA = 5,201 Runway 19 LDA = 5,201  $58,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Lancaster  Fairfield County 

• Land acquisition • Relocate highway • Remove existing highway • Prohibit agricultural uses in RSA • Relocate localizer • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 10 ASDA = 5,004 Runway 10 LDA = 5,004 Runway 28 ASDA = 5,004 Runway 28 LDA = 5,004  $7,093,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 10 threshold 304 ft. NE • Marking/electrical modifications • Prohibit agricultural uses in RSA 

Runway 10 ASDA = 5,004 Runway 10 LDA = 4,700 Runway 28 ASDA = 4,300 Runway 28 LDA = 4,300  $250,000  

New Philadelphia  Harry Clever Field** 

• Demo existing road (Runway 32) • New road outside RSA • Grading, seeding, and mulching • Declared distances 

Runway 14 ASDA = 3,951 Runway 14 LDA = 3,610 Runway 32 ASDA = 3,818 Runway 32 LDA = 3,818  $443,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 32 threshold 20 ft. NW • Marking/electrical modifications 

Runway 14 ASDA = 3,931 Runway 14 LDA = 3,590 Runway 32 ASDA = 3,798 Runway 32 LDA = 3,798  $274,000  

Oxford  Miami University** • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 05 ASDA = 4,011 Runway 05 LDA = 3,741 Runway 23 ASDA = 4,011 Runway 23 LDA = 4,011  $35,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Page 7: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐7 

Table8‐2CorrectiveActionOptionsonPrimaryRSAs,withEstimatedCosts

Associated City  Airport Name  Corrective Action Option 1 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate  Corrective Action Option 2 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate 

GA Level 3                      

Barnesville Barnesville‐Bradfield**  • Declared distances 

Runway 09 ASDA = 4,004 Runway 09 LDA = 3,694 Runway 27 ASDA = 3,854 Runway 27 LDA = 3,854  $5,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Bucyrus Port Bucyrus‐Crawford County** 

• Extend existing culvert • Backfill • Grading, seeding, mulching 

Runway 04 ASDA = 3,895 Runway 04 LDA = 3,619 Runway 22 ASDA = 3,895 Runway 22 LDA = 3,895  $19,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Chesapeake/ Huntington, WV 

Lawrence County Airpark** 

• Relocate service road south • Embankment fill (both ends) • Clearing and grubbing • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 08 ASDA = 3,001 Runway 08 LDA = 2,816 Runway 26 ASDA = 2,816 Runway 26 LDA = 2,816  $782,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 08 threshold 25 ft. NE • Relocate Runway 26 threshold 180 ft. SW • Marking/electrical modifications 

Runway 08 ASDA = 2,821 Runway 08 LDA = 2,611 Runway 26 ASDA = 2,791 Runway 26 LDA = 2,611  $199,000  

Galion  Galion Municipal** • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 05 ASDA = 3,504 Runway 05 LDA = 3,317 Runway 23 ASDA = 3,504 Runway 23 LDA = 3,504  $34,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Gallipolis Gallia‐Meigs Regional 

• Road relocation (Runway 05) • Relocate ditch (Runway 23) • Clearing and grubbing • Grading, seeding, and mulching • Erosion and sedimentation control 

Runway 05 ASDA = 3,999 Runway 05 LDA = 3,999 Runway 23 ASDA = 3,999 Runway 23 LDA = 3,999  $396,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 05 threshold 75 ft. NE • Relocate Runway 23 threshold 55 ft. SW • Marking/electrical modifications 

Runway 05 ASDA = 3,944 Runway 05 LDA = 3,869 Runway 23 ASDA = 3,924 Runway 23 LDA = 3,869  $230,000  

Hillsboro  Highland County • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 05 ASDA = 3,520 Runway 05 LDA = 3,520 Runway 23 ASDA = 3,520 Runway 23 LDA = 3,520  $914,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 05 threshold 240 ft. NE • Relocate Runway 23 threshold 230 ft. SW • Marking/electrical modifications 

Runway 05 ASDA = 3,290 Runway 05 LDA = 3,034 Runway 23 ASDA = 3,280 Runway 23 LDA = 3,034  $325,000  

Page 8: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐8 

Table8‐2CorrectiveActionOptionsonPrimaryRSAs,withEstimatedCosts

Associated City  Airport Name  Corrective Action Option 1 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate  Corrective Action Option 2 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate 

McArthur  Vinton County** 

• Relocate road • Remove existing road • Embankment fill (both ends) • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 09 ASDA = 3,725 Runway 09 LDA = 3,601 Runway 27 ASDA = 3,725 Runway 27 LDA = 3,725  $2,126,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 27 threshold 150 ft. W • Marking modifications 

Runway 09 ASDA = 3,575 Runway 09 LDA = 3,451 Runway 27 ASDA = 3,601 Runway 27 LDA = 3,415  $98,000  

Norwalk Norwalk‐Huron County** 

• Remove connecting roads (Runway 28) • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 10 ASDA = 4,210 Runway 10 LDA = 3,960 Runway 28 ASDA = 4,210 Runway 28 LDA = 3,535  $14,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Piqua Piqua‐Hartzell Field* 

• Prohibit agricultural uses in RSA 

Runway 08 ASDA = 3,998 Runway 08 LDA = 3,998 Runway 26 ASDA = 3,998 Runway 26 LDA = 3,998  $0   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

GA Level 4                      

Deshler Deshler Municipal Landing Strip*  • Declared distances 

Runway 09 ASDA = 2480 Runway 09 LDA = 1740 Runway 27 ASDA = 2240 Runway 27 LDA = 2240  $5,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Kelleys Island Kelleys Island Land Field** 

• Demo and relocate existing road • Relocate security fence • Remove existing building• Clearing and grubbing • Relocate existing signs • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 09 ASDA = 2,202 Runway 09 LDA = 2,002 Runway 27 ASDA = 2,202 Runway 27 LDA = 2,202  $656,000  

• Declared distances • Relocate Runway 09 threshold 30 ft. E • Marking/electrical modifications 

Runway 09 ASDA = 2,202 Runway 09 LDA = 1,962 Runway 27 ASDA = 1,962 Runway 27 LDA = 1,962  $149,000  

McConnelsville  Morgan County* ** 

• Remove existing road • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 12 ASDA = 3,500 Runway 12 LDA = 3,150 Runway 30 ASDA = 3,500 Runway 30 LDA = 3,500  $259,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

New Lexington  Perry County • Grading, seeding, and mulching 

Runway 08 ASDA = 3,498 Runway 08 LDA = 3,498 Runway 26 ASDA = 3,498 Runway 26 LDA = 3,498  $37,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Page 9: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐9 

Table8‐2CorrectiveActionOptionsonPrimaryRSAs,withEstimatedCosts

Associated City  Airport Name  Corrective Action Option 1 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate  Corrective Action Option 2 

Runway Distances (feet) Cost 

Estimate 

Willard  Willard* ** 

• Demo existing apron • Relocate access road • New apron • Declared distances  

Runway 10 ASDA = 4,028 Runway 10 LDA = 3,715 Runway 28 ASDA = 3,858 Runway 28 LDA = 3,240  $720,000   ‐  ‐  ‐ 

Note: runway distances listed in this table are estimations for planning purposes only. They consider RSA standards alone and do not take into account other planning/operational considerations 

*Non‐NPIAS Airport **Though currently not provided in FAA 5010 information, current runway configuration indicates declared distances are applicable in the existing runway condition. 

Source: Airport Inventory and Data Survey, ODOT, RS&H 

Page 10: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐10

Recommendations Related to RPZ Land Acquisition TheRPZisatrapezoidalarealocatedateachrunwayenddesignedtoenhancetheprotectionofpeopleandpropertyontheground.AnoncompliantRPZmayresultfrominsufficientpropertyownership,objectpenetrationabovesurface,unapprovedencroachments,androadway/vehicleaccess.Chapter6ofthisstudypresentedcurrentRPZcomplianceonprimaryrunwaysintheOhioairportsystem.DatawasobtainedduringtheAirportInventoryandDataSurveyeffort,aswellasfromremotesensingofsatelliteimageryandairportlayoutplans.Currently,33generalaviationairportsinthesystemreportedlycontrol100percentoftheirprimaryRPZsthroughfeesimpleoravigationeasement.

RecommendationsforbringingprimaryRPZsintocompliancearebasedonlandacquisition.AlthoughitispossibletobringanRPZintocompliancethroughaneasement,thisisnotameasurableaction,whiletheacquisitionoflandthroughfeesimplehasacostestimateassociatedwithit.ThefollowingsectionwillthereforeoffercostestimatestobringnoncompliantprimaryRPZsintheOhiosystemintocompliance.

ThefollowingdatawasneededtoestimatethecostofbringingprimaryRPZsintocompliance:

DimensionsofeachprimaryRPZ PercentofeachRPZcurrentlyuncontrolledbyeachOhiosystemairport Averagecostoflandperacreineachairport’slocation

Thedimensionsofanairport’sRPZsareafunctionoftheRDC/ARCandthevisibilityminimumsassociatedwiththeeachrunwayend.1ArunwaymayhavedifferentsizeRPZsoneachrunwayenddependingonthevisibilityminimumsassociatedwiththatrunwayend.Additionally,theFAAdefinestwodifferenttypesofRPZs:approachRPZs,anddepartureRPZs.Withoutspecialproceduressuchasdeclareddistances,theapproachanddepartureRPZsaretypicallycoincident.AsthedepartureRPZisalwayssmallerthantheapproachRPZ,thesizeoftheapproachRPZwasconsideredforcostestimationpurposes.

VisibilityminimumswereobtainedfromthelatestapproachchartsforeachairportasdetailedintheFAA’sdigitalterminalprocedures.OncethecombinedareaofthefullRPZwasdetermined,theareawasreducedbythepercentofRPZareacontrolledasreportedbytheairportsontheAirportInventoryandDataSurveytodeterminetheuncontrolledRPZarea.

Thecostoflandappliedtoeachairportisbasedonanumberoffactors,includinggeneralairportlocation(urban,mixed,orrural)andregionwithinthestate.Thesecostsareestimatesandthereforeonlymeantforaplanninglevelanalysis.ThisanalysisdoesnottakeintoaccountotherfactorsthatmayneedtobeconsideredwhenbringinganRPZintocompliance,suchastheavailabilityoflandortheneedtobuymorepropertythancontainedintheRPZtoavoidleavingirregularorlandlockedparcels

TheestimatedcosttoacquirelandforRPZcontrolissummarizedbyairportclassificationlevelinTable8‐3.System‐wide,thecosttobringprimaryRPZsintocomplianceisestimatedtobeover$14.1million.

1FAAAC150/5300‐13A,AirportDesign

Page 11: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐11

Table8‐3SummaryofCoststoBringPrimaryRPZsIntoCompliance

Classification Level Estimated Land Acquisition Cost 

GA Level 1  $3,001,000 

GA Level 2  $1,988,000 

GA Level 3  $5,762,000 

GA Level 4  $3,430,000 

Full System  $14,181,000 

Source: Airport Inventory and Data Survey, RS&H 

Table8‐4detailsthisestimatedcostbyairport,includingtheuncontrolledareawithineachnoncompliantprimaryRPZ.Duetothecostoflandvaryingbasedoneachairport’sspecificlocation,thecostperacreisnotconsistentthroughoutthesystem.CincinnatiWestAirportinHarrisonhasthehighestestimatedcosttobringitsRPZintocompliance.Eachrunwayendhasanestimated13.8acresofuncontrolledRPZ,leadingtoanestimatedlandcostofover$1million.

AllRPZcompliancerecommendationsaremeanttobringprimaryRPZsintocompliancewiththecurrentRDC/ARC,anddonotaccountforARCupgraderecommendationsmadeelsewhereinthischapter.

Page 12: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐12

Table8‐4EstimatedCostofAcquiringLandforRPZControl

Associated City  Airport Name Primary Runway 

Uncontrolled Area: End 1 (acres) 

Estimated Land 

Acquisition Cost: End 1 

Uncontrolled Area: End 2 (acres) 

Estimated Land 

Acquisition Cost: End 2 

Estimated Total Land Acquisition 

Cost 

GA Level 1                      

Akron  Akron Fulton International  07/25  1.5  $64,000  4.4  $192,000  $256,000 

Ashtabula  Northeast Ohio Regional  09/27  1.5  $14,000  0.0  $0  $14,000 

Bluffton  Bluffton  05/23  0.7  $21,000  0.0  $0  $21,000 

Bowling Green  Wood County  10/28  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Chillicothe  Ross County  05/23  5.9  $39,000  2.4  $16,000  $55,000 

Cincinnati  Cincinnati Municipal‐Lunken Field  03R/21L  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Cleveland  Burke Lakefront  06L/24R  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Cleveland  Cuyahoga County  06/24  0.0  $0  2.9  $111,000  $111,000 

Columbus  Bolton Field  04/22  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Columbus  Ohio State University  09R/27L  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Coshocton  Richard Downing  04/22  6.9  $46,000  6.9  $46,000  $92,000 

Dayton  Dayton‐Wright Brothers  02/20  8.8  $330,000  0.4  $15,000  $345,000 

Defiance  Defiance Memorial  12/30  11.0  $151,000  3.4  $47,000  $198,000 

Delaware  Delaware Municipal‐Jim Moore Field  10/28  1.0  $93,000  0.3  $28,000  $121,000 

Hamilton  Butler County Regional  11/29  2.9  $110,000  0.0  $0  $110,000 

Lebanon  Warren County/John Lane Field  01/19  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Lima  Lima Allen County  10/28  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Lorain/Elyria  Lorain County Regional  07/25  15.8  $143,000  0.0  $0  $143,000 

Mansfield  Mansfield Lahm Regional  14/32  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Marion  Marion Municipal  07/25  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Marysville  Union County  09/27  0.1  $6,000  0.0  $0  $6,000 

Middletown  Middletown Regional/Hook Field  05/23  0.0  $0  0.7  $26,000  $26,000 

Ottawa  Putnam County  09/27  13.8  $188,000  11.0  $151,000  $339,000 

Portsmouth  Greater Portsmouth Regional  18/36  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Sidney  Sidney Municipal  10/28  12.4  $61,000  6.9  $34,000  $95,000 

Springfield  Springfield‐Beckley Municipal  06/24  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Tiffin  Seneca County  06/24  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Toledo  Toledo Executive  14/32  17.7  $242,000  22.1  $302,000  $544,000 

Wapakoneta  Neil Armstrong  08/26  22.1  $302,000  0.0  $0  $302,000 

Page 13: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐13

Table8‐4EstimatedCostofAcquiringLandforRPZControl

Associated City  Airport Name Primary Runway 

Uncontrolled Area: End 1 (acres) 

Estimated Land 

Acquisition Cost: End 1 

Uncontrolled Area: End 2 (acres) 

Estimated Land 

Acquisition Cost: End 2 

Estimated Total Land Acquisition 

Cost 

Willoughby  Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal  05/23  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Wilmington  Wilmington Air Park  04L/22R  3.2  $15,000  42.6  $208,000  $223,000 

Wooster  Wayne County  10/28  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Zanesville  Zanesville Municipal  04/22  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

GA Level 2                      

Athens/Albany  Ohio University‐Snyder Field  07/25  4.4  $30,000  0.5  $3,000  $33,000 

Bellefontaine  Bellefontaine Regional  07/25  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Bryan  Williams County  07/25  10.3  $141,000  4.1  $57,000  $198,000 

Circleville  Pickaway County Memorial  01/19  3.4  $68,000  2.8  $54,000  $122,000 

Findlay  Findlay  18/36  14.7  $453,000  0.0  $0  $453,000 

Fostoria  Fostoria Metropolitan  09/27  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Fremont  Sandusky County Regional  06/24  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Jackson  James A. Rhodes  01/19  7.7  $52,000  1.5  $10,000  $62,000 

Lancaster  Fairfield County  10/28  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Millersburg  Holmes County  09/27  0.0  $0  6.9  $0  $0 

Mount Vernon  Knox County  10/28  0.9  $17,000  1.5  $29,000  $46,000 

New Philadelphia  Harry Clever Field  14/32  13.1  $266,000  13.8  $280,000  $546,000 

Newark  Newark‐Heath  09/27  0.7  $31,000  0.7  $31,000  $62,000 

Oxford  Miami University  05/23  2.8  $46,000  11.0  $184,000  $230,000 

Port Clinton  Carl R. Keller Field  09/27  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Ravenna  Portage County  09/27  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Urbana  Grimes Field  02/20  0.0  $0  0.1  $1,000  $1,000 

Wauseon  Fulton County  09/27  10.3  $141,000  6.9  $94,000  $235,000 

GA Level 3                      

Ashland  Ashland County  01/19  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Barnesville  Barnesville‐Bradfield  09/27  13.8  $92,000  13.8  $92,000  $184,000 

Batavia  Clermont County  04/22  12.4  $464,000  12.4  $464,000  $928,000 

Bucyrus  Port Bucyrus‐Crawford County  04/22  8.3  $113,000  5.5  $75,000  $188,000 

Cadiz  Harrison County  13/31  0.3  $2,000  11.6  $77,000  $79,000 

Cambridge  Cambridge Municipal  04/22  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Page 14: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐14

Table8‐4EstimatedCostofAcquiringLandforRPZControl

Associated City  Airport Name Primary Runway 

Uncontrolled Area: End 1 (acres) 

Estimated Land 

Acquisition Cost: End 1 

Uncontrolled Area: End 2 (acres) 

Estimated Land 

Acquisition Cost: End 2 

Estimated Total Land Acquisition 

Cost 

Carrollton  Carroll County‐Tolson  07/25  12.4  $346,000  12.4  $346,000  $692,000 

Celina  Lakefield  08/26  0.8  $25,000  0.0  $0  $25,000 

Chesapeake/Huntington, WV  Lawrence County Airpark  08/26  11.0  $308,000  11.0  $308,000  $616,000 

Dayton  Greene County‐Lewis A. Jackson Regional  07/25  0.0  $0  12.4  $61,000  $61,000 

Galion  Galion Municipal  05/23  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Gallipolis  Gallia‐Meigs Regional  05/23  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Harrison  Cincinnati West  01/19  13.8  $516,000  13.8  $516,000  $1,032,000 

Hillsboro  Highland County  05/23  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Kent  Kent State University  01/19  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Kenton  Hardin County  04/22  2.8  $38,000  4.7  $64,000  $102,000 

London  Madison County  09/27  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

McArthur  Vinton County  09/27  6.9  $46,000  0.0  $0  $46,000 

Medina  Medina Municipal  09/27  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Middlefield  Geauga County  11/29  6.9  $62,000  9.6  $87,000  $149,000 

Napoleon  Henry County  10/28  11.0  $151,000  13.8  $188,000  $339,000 

Norwalk  Norwalk‐Huron County  10/28  2.8  $56,000  2.8  $56,000  $112,000 

Piqua  Piqua‐Hartzell Field  08/26  8.8  $43,000  5.8  $28,000  $71,000 

Steubenville  Jefferson County Airpark  14/32  13.8  $384,000  13.8  $384,000  $768,000 

Van Wert  Van Wert County  09/27  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Versailles  Darke County  09/27  0.0  $0  11.2  $54,000  $54,000 

Wadsworth  Wadsworth Municipal  02/20  3.4  $31,000  0.0  $0  $31,000 

Waverly  Pike County  07/25  12.7  $85,000  12.7  $85,000  $170,000 

Wilmington  Clinton Field  03/21  11.0  $54,000  12.4  $61,000  $115,000 

GA Level 4                      

Caldwell  Noble County  05/23  13.8  $92,000  3.4  $23,000  $115,000 

Dayton  Moraine Air Park  08/26  11.3  $231,000  10.2  $208,000  $439,000 

Deshler  Deshler Municipal Landing Strip  09/27  12.1  $166,000  13.8  $188,000  $354,000 

East Liverpool  Columbiana County  07/25  0.0  $0  6.9  $62,000  $62,000 

Georgetown  Brown County  18/36  1.4  $52,000  0.0  $0  $52,000 

Kelleys Island  Kelleys Island Municipal  09/27  13.8  $280,000  13.8  $280,000  $560,000 

Page 15: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐15

Table8‐4EstimatedCostofAcquiringLandforRPZControl

Associated City  Airport Name Primary Runway 

Uncontrolled Area: End 1 (acres) 

Estimated Land 

Acquisition Cost: End 1 

Uncontrolled Area: End 2 (acres) 

Estimated Land 

Acquisition Cost: End 2 

Estimated Total Land Acquisition 

Cost 

McConnelsville  Morgan County  12/30  13.8  $92,000  0.0  $0  $92,000 

Middle Bass  Middle Bass Island Airport  10/28  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Mount Gilead  Morrow County  10/28  0.7  $14,000  0.0  $0  $14,000 

New Lexington  Perry County  08/26  13.8  $92,000  6.9  $46,000  $138,000 

North Bass Island  North Bass Island  01/19  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

Put‐In‐Bay  Put In Bay  03/21  10.3  $318,000  10.3  $318,000  $636,000 

Upper Sandusky  Wyandot County  18/36  13.8  $188,000  13.8  $188,000  $376,000 

Washington Court House  Fayette County  05/23  0.0  $0  0.0  $0  $0 

West Union  Alexander Salamon  05/23  0.4  $3,000  0.3  $2,000  $5,000 

Willard  Willard  10/28  13.8  $280,000  13.8  $280,000  $560,000 

Woodsfield  Monroe County  07/25  1.4  $9,000  2.8  $18,000  $27,000 

Source: Airport Inventory and Data Survey, RS&H 

Page 16: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐16

Recommendations Related to Pavement Maintenance ThePavementConditionIndex(PCI)isaratingsystemappliedtoairportpavements,includingrunways,taxiways,andaprons.ThePCIassessestheconditionandfunctionalperformanceofeachpavement,ratingitonascalefrom0to100,withratingsofgood,satisfactory,fair,poor,verypoor,serious,andfailed.ThepurposeofthePCIistoprovideairportswithameansofassessingpavementsforongoingpavementmaintenance.

DependingonthePCIscoreandthepointinthepavement’slife,anairportpavementmayneedpreventativemaintenancemajorrehabilitation.Suchprojectsincludethefollowing:

Preventativemaintenance,suchascracksealingandshallowpatching.Theseprojectsaretypicallyfundedbytheairportitself.

Majorrehabilitation,suchasoverlaysandreconstructions.TheseprojectsareavailableforstateandFAAfunding.

Chapter6ofthisstudypresentedadetailedanalysisofpavementconditionatOhiosystemairports.Thisincludedanalysisfortwopavementsets:primaryrunwaysandallotherairportpavements,whichincludessecondaryrunways,taxiways,andaprons.

TheMicroPAVERsoftwareprogramwasutilizedtodevelopaMaintenanceandRehabilitation(M&R)planforallgeneralaviationairportsintheOhiosystem.AcriticalPCIwassetat60tofocustherehabilitationworkonpavementsfallingbelowthiscondition,withagoaltostabilizethesystemM&Rcostsandpavementconditionsovertime.Anoverallyearlybudgettomaintaintheconditionoftheairportswithavailabledataisapproximately$25millionperyear.Usingthisbudgetlevel,individualprojectswereanticipatedfora20‐yearperiodfromtheNovember2012conditionreportdate.Costswerebrokenoutbyairportforthe1‐to5‐yearperiod,6‐to10‐yearperiod,and11‐to20‐yearplanningperiods.

Tables8‐5through8‐7detailprojectedPCIscoresatgeneralaviationairportsintheOhiosystem.MicroPAVERprojectedPCIscoresforprimaryrunwaysandallotherairportpavementsgiventheuseofonlypreventativemaintenanceorbothpreventativemaintenanceandmajorrehabilitationprojects.TheuseofbothpreventativemaintenanceandmajorrehabilitationresultsinamuchhigherPCIforairportpavementsinthefuture.Notethattheperiodinwhichmajorrehabilitationprojectswereprojecteddependsonthecurrentconditionofeachpavement.Additionally,thePCIscoresshownforpreventativemaintenanceassumethatmajorrehabilitationprojectshavenotoccurredatanyofthethreeplanningphases,resultingincontinuallydecreasingscores.

Page 17: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐17

Table8‐51‐5YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

1‐5 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

1‐5 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

GA Level 1                   

Akron  Akron Fulton International  1,576,993  30.8  61.5  75.4  63.1 

Ashtabula  Northeast Ohio Regional  312,920  55.5  62.7  87.3  63.5 

Bluffton  Bluffton  65,770  75.3  42.5  74.9  31.4 

Bowling Green  Wood County  50,400  80.1  77.5  79.9  77.1 

Chillicothe  Ross County  ‐  75.5  82.4  75.2  84.1 

Cincinnati  Cincinnati Municipal‐Lunken Field  1,927,335  40.3  38.3  85.2  59.0 

Cleveland  Burke Lakefront  Data Unavailable 

Cleveland  Cuyahoga County  936,920  48.3  63.0  84.9  69.1 

Columbus  Bolton Field  560,060  61.8  69.6  77.6  71.4 

Columbus  Ohio State University  535,980  82.3  62.0  82.0  63.4 

Coshocton  Richard Downing  617,989  73.4  73.4  74.0  73.7 

Dayton  Dayton‐Wright Brothers  29,229  87.2  64.0  86.8  73.0 

Defiance  Defiance Memorial  13,750  78.2  80.2  77.4  82.8 

Delaware  Delaware Municipal‐Jim Moore Field  123,920  74.0  79.3  73.8  81.2 

Hamilton  Butler County Regional  252,115  76.7  58.1  76.5  70.4 

Lebanon  Warren County/John Lane Field  260,000  60.9  26.2  90.6  25.8 

Lima  Lima Allen County  16,720  82.2  84.0  77.9  83.0 

Lorain/Elyria  Lorain County Regional  585,610  50.8  46.6  93.2  43.8 

Mansfield  Mansfield Lahm Regional  955,738  82.2  39.0  81.9  56.6 

Marion  Marion Municipal  543,963  55.2  65.9  88.9  65.2 

Marysville  Union County  53,175  79.7  66.8  78.5  66.6 

Middletown  Middletown Regional/Hook Field  ‐  74.7  65.3  74.3  66.8 

Ottawa  Putnam County  288,145  29.5  56.1  83.1  52.2 

Portsmouth  Greater Portsmouth Regional  133,600  67.5  66.4  69.7  69.5 

Sidney  Sidney Municipal  ‐  93.1  72.6  92.6  73.4 

Springfield  Springfield‐Beckley Municipal  2,175,262  75.5  66.4  91.1  74.0 

Tiffin  Seneca County  19,960  84.8  71.0  84.5  78.0 

Toledo  Toledo Executive  5,430  84.0  66.9  83.3  67.7 

Wapakoneta  Neil Armstrong  106,822  78.2  65.2  77.1  68.8 

Willoughby  Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal  819,110  50.2  53.6  91.0  62.3 

Page 18: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐18

Table8‐51‐5YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

1‐5 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

1‐5 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Wilmington  Wilmington Air Park*  Data Unavailable 

Wooster  Wayne County  511,120  45.7  40.0  84.2  40.5 

Zanesville  Zanesville Municipal  758,280  75.4  50.5  75.3  61.5 

GA Level 2                   

Athens/Albany  Ohio University‐Snyder Field  459,700  65.1  72.8  84.7  75.5 

Bellefontaine  Bellefontaine Regional  ‐  77.9  78.2  77.7  76.3 

Bryan  Williams County  391,888  47.2  57.6  93.2  47.3 

Circleville  Pickaway County Memorial  57,200  74.0  75.3  73.9  76.6 

Findlay  Findlay  376,580  66.1  72.6  81.4  77.8 

Fostoria  Fostoria Metropolitan  173,790  82.9  76.7  79.7  70.6 

Fremont  Sandusky County Regional  ‐  74.5  75.8  74.4  73.6 

Jackson  James A. Rhodes  285,900  67.2  55.5  89.0  60.9 

Lancaster  Fairfield County  287,000  63.3  74.0  73.3  74.4 

Millersburg  Holmes County  20,240  93.1  64.8  92.6  64.5 

Mount Vernon  Knox County  32,338  78.5  69.2  77.9  73.2 

New Philadelphia  Harry Clever Field  396,500  45.4  83.7  93.2  84.1 

Newark  Newark‐Heath  273,692  90.0  53.3  89.6  70.8 

Oxford  Miami University  300,000  52.5  69.2  88.5  68.4 

Port Clinton  Carl R. Keller Field  345,815  86.5  62.7  85.9  68.1 

Ravenna  Portage County  391,320  31.2  54.8  83.2  55.0 

Urbana  Grimes Field  35,310  75.9  66.3  75.8  73.3 

Wauseon  Fulton County  9,650  77.9  64.6  77.7  66.9 

GA Level 3                   

Ashland  Ashland County  ‐  79.8  76.0  79.6  81.8 

Barnesville  Barnesville‐Bradfield  261,950  58.5  52.0  82.8  51.2 

Batavia  Clermont County  55,200  91.6  70.1  91.9  73.1 

Bucyrus  Port Bucyrus‐Crawford County  ‐  69.0  69.2  68.8  70.6 

Cadiz  Harrison County  218,770  72.6  66.7  82.8  70.9 

Cambridge  Cambridge Municipal  336,350  58.8  68.7  88.5  68.0 

Carrollton  Carroll County‐Tolson  12,540  76.1  70.2  75.1  77.3 

Celina  Lakefield  ‐  82.7  76.3  82.4  77.4 

Page 19: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐19

Table8‐51‐5YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

1‐5 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

1‐5 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Chesapeake/Huntington, WV  Lawrence County Airpark  226,548  24.6  58.1  68.5  51.2 

Dayton  Greene County‐Lewis A. Jackson Regional  ‐  77.0  76.4  76.3  75.6 

Galion  Galion Municipal  ‐  83.3  77.2  82.9  79.1 

Gallipolis  Gallia‐Meigs Regional  300,000  26.8  57.7  70.1  57.5 

Harrison  Cincinnati West  5,530  76.6  70.4  74.9  79.9 

Hillsboro  Highland County  ‐  76.6  83.5  76.4  83.1 

Kent  Kent State University  74,480  74.7  65.7  76.1  67.4 

Kenton  Hardin County  315,890  66.0  47.2  91.9  51.8 

London  Madison County  ‐  73.5  69.9  73.4  75.9 

McArthur  Vinton County  288,750  46.0  30.8  93.2  30.3 

Medina  Medina Municipal  528,157  53.9  50.9  50.6  53.3 

Middlefield  Geauga County  22,331  84.8  52.2  84.5  50.8 

Napoleon  Henry County  ‐  77.2  41.6  77.0  29.3 

Norwalk  Norwalk‐Huron County  315,000  58.4  50.8  77.6  38.8 

Piqua  Piqua Airport‐Hartzell Field*  ‐  70.8  39.7  70.6  39.2 

Steubenville  Jefferson County Airpark  356,637  71.7  51.5  83.2  52.7 

Van Wert  Van Wert County  12,960  81.7  61.8  81.7  73.6 

Versailles  Darke County  104,670  84.6  61.6  84.3  68.4 

Wadsworth  Wadsworth Municipal  364,965  36.6  45.7  84.4  70.3 

Waverly  Pike County  627,142  44.5  48.8  87.7  59.6 

Wilmington  Clinton Field  10,260  68.1  81.6  73.7  82.4 

GA Level 4                   

Caldwell  Noble County*  33,700  77.6  21.5  75.5  26.1 

Dayton  Moraine Air Park*  16,786  70.0  67.1  69.8  76.2 

Deshler  Deshler Municipal Landing Strip*  Unpaved 

East Liverpool  Columbiana County  7,470  86.7  64.0  86.3  65.9 

Georgetown  Brown County  ‐  76.9  80.1  76.7  78.4 

Kelleys Island  Kelleys Island Municipal  90,300  84.9  29.2  84.5  64.9 

McConnelsville  Morgan County*  ‐  75.8  24.8  75.7  20.9 

Middle Bass  Middle Bass Island Airport  348,341  70.2  68.4  70.0  72.1 

Mount Gilead  Morrow County  14,170  87.2  71.5  86.8  74.3 

Page 20: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐20

Table8‐51‐5YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

1‐5 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

1‐5 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

New Lexington  Perry County  262,500  18.2  45.0  50.6  45.2 

North Bass Island  North Bass Island  108,000  18.1  44.5  50.6  44.0 

Put‐In‐Bay  Put In Bay  ‐  90.0  21.0  89.6  20.8 

Upper Sandusky  Wyandot County  ‐  75.1  81.2  75.0  80.8 

Washington Court House  Fayette County  360,000  58.6  57.3  90.4  50.0 

West Union  Alexander Salamon  ‐  79.1  18.6  78.9  7.4 

Willard  Willard*  ‐  76.7  83.3  76.1  83.0 

Woodsfield  Monroe County  ‐  75.4  70.9  75.3  64.8 

*Non‐NPIAS airport Source: Ohio Department of Transportation, RS&H 

Page 21: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐21

Table8‐66‐10YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

6‐10 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

6‐10 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

GA Level 1                   Akron  Akron Fulton International  450,664  19.8  52.0  84.0  76.6 

Ashtabula  Northeast Ohio Regional  238,600  43.0  52.4  78.1  79.5 

Bluffton  Bluffton  ‐  70.7  37.1  70.0  62.7 

Bowling Green  Wood County  ‐  74.8  72.3  74.6  71.8 

Chillicothe  Ross County  ‐  70.9  75.0  70.5  75.7 

Cincinnati  Cincinnati Municipal‐Lunken Field  756,703  25.1  28.8  82.7  76.0 

Cleveland  Burke Lakefront  Data Unavailable 

Cleveland  Cuyahoga County  76,635  36.2  54.1  81.1  67.1 

Columbus  Bolton Field  11,030  47.0  61.8  87.3  64.3 

Columbus  Ohio State University  266,570  75.8  55.9  75.6  64.2 

Coshocton  Richard Downing  ‐  63.4  65.2  87.5  81.3 

Dayton  Dayton‐Wright Brothers  173,139  77.9  57.0  77.7  69.7 

Defiance  Defiance Memorial  ‐  73.6  73.1  73.0  75.6 

Delaware  Delaware Municipal‐Jim Moore Field  ‐  68.4  71.5  68.1  77.6 

Hamilton  Butler County Regional  37,353  71.6  50.0  72.0  76.4 

Lebanon  Warren County/John Lane Field  159,900  47.7  18.1  80.4  54.1 

Lima  Lima Allen County  ‐  75.2  76.4  72.8  75.9 

Lorain/Elyria  Lorain County Regional  830,961  34.1  35.0  80.8  73.1 

Mansfield  Mansfield Lahm Regional  772,773  75.7  32.2  75.6  65.2 

Marion  Marion Municipal  239,946  38.9  58.6  82.4  69.7 

Marysville  Union County  170,475  74.4  55.9  73.8  80.2 

Middletown  Middletown Regional/Hook Field  154,950  69.7  59.6  68.9  68.1 

Ottawa  Putnam County  44,680  18.8  51.7  82.7  54.6 

Portsmouth  Greater Portsmouth Regional  409,780  56.0  60.4  84.4  67.7 

Sidney  Sidney Municipal  16,740  80.7  66.3  80.5  69.5 

Springfield  Springfield‐Beckley Municipal  73,200  68.4  57.3  79.7  77.3 

Tiffin  Seneca County  ‐  76.9  62.0  76.7  73.8 

Toledo  Toledo Executive  71,048  76.5  60.6  76.2  63.6 

Wapakoneta  Neil Armstrong  103,322  73.5  57.7  72.7  76.3 

Willoughby  Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal  618,458  35.9  43.5  81.6  79.3 

Page 22: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐22

Table8‐66‐10YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

6‐10 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

6‐10 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Wilmington  Wilmington Air Park*  Data Unavailable 

Wooster  Wayne County  188,084  35.3  31.1  82.1  56.4 

Zanesville  Zanesville Municipal  413,101  70.8  40.2  70.6  68.4 

GA Level 2                   Athens/Albany  Ohio University‐Snyder Field  ‐  54.6  65.8  79.5  71.9 

Bellefontaine  Bellefontaine Regional  17,920  73.4  69.8  73.3  71.4 

Bryan  Williams County  151,800  30.7  47.9  80.8  71.3 

Circleville  Pickaway County Memorial  ‐  68.5  68.5  68.2  74.7 

Findlay  Findlay  393,790  54.9  64.2  79.9  73.3 

Fostoria  Fostoria Metropolitan  66,590  75.9  68.0  74.3  83.4 

Fremont  Sandusky County Regional  64,167  69.4  67.9  69.2  76.3 

Jackson  James A. Rhodes  46,320  58.8  46.8  78.7  65.2 

Lancaster  Fairfield County  248,875  49.3  67.2  89.3  74.1 

Millersburg  Holmes County  36,905  80.7  55.2  80.5  61.7 

Mount Vernon  Knox County  11,356  73.8  61.9  73.4  70.5 

New Philadelphia  Harry Clever Field  19,200  29.2  74.6  80.8  80.4 

Newark  Newark‐Heath  5,000  79.2  43.7  79.0  80.4 

Oxford  Miami University  ‐  36.2  59.3  82.5  59.0 

Port Clinton  Carl R. Keller Field  433,310  77.6  53.2  77.3  73.1 

Ravenna  Portage County  45,941  19.5  47.5  82.7  61.4 

Urbana  Grimes Field  14,550  71.5  57.3  71.3  70.0 

Wauseon  Fulton County  ‐  73.4  57.1  73.3  62.4 

GA Level 3                   Ashland  Ashland County  ‐  74.6  69.5  74.5  74.2 

Barnesville  Barnesville‐Bradfield  131,220  42.7  39.1  84.8  76.3 

Batavia  Clermont County  28,520  80.0  62.7  80.1  76.1 

Bucyrus  Port Bucyrus‐Crawford County  292,500  58.5  63.9  82.7  65.4 

Cadiz  Harrison County  16,820  64.8  56.6  78.8  75.9 

Cambridge  Cambridge Municipal  90,900  44.9  58.9  82.2  83.9 

Carrollton  Carroll County‐Tolson  ‐  71.5  64.0  70.3  74.2 

Celina  Lakefield  ‐  76.0  71.0  75.8  72.3 

Page 23: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐23

Table8‐66‐10YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

6‐10 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

6‐10 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Chesapeake/Huntington, WV  Lawrence County Airpark  58,290  15.2  49.3  84.5  67.9 

Dayton  Greene County‐Lewis A. Jackson Regional  ‐  72.6  69.8  72.0  68.7 

Galion  Galion Municipal  ‐  76.2  70.4  76.1  72.4 

Gallipolis  Gallia‐Meigs Regional  87,450  17.7  52.9  84.8  65.1 

Harrison  Cincinnati West  30,062  71.4  60.7  69.1  72.5 

Hillsboro  Highland County  ‐  72.3  76.3  72.1  76.1 

Kent  Kent State University  99,920  68.7  58.2  74.2  67.1 

Kenton  Hardin County  17,500  54.4  35.1  80.2  46.7 

London  Madison County  31,809  67.5  64.7  67.2  73.8 

McArthur  Vinton County  69,600  29.7  18.4  80.8  66.2 

Medina  Medina Municipal  79,457  46.0  41.2  87.3  67.3 

Middlefield  Geauga County  66,118  76.9  44.8  76.7  55.4 

Napoleon  Henry County  ‐  72.9  36.5  72.7  25.3 

Norwalk  Norwalk‐Huron County  ‐  42.7  45.6  87.0  33.8 

Piqua  Piqua Airport‐Hartzell Field*  464,400  61.8  24.9  77.6  84.9 

Steubenville  Jefferson County Airpark  ‐  60.3  38.4  83.1  64.9 

Van Wert  Van Wert County  73,570  75.5  52.2  75.5  74.8 

Versailles  Darke County  72,900  76.8  47.9  76.6  87.1 

Wadsworth  Wadsworth Municipal  17,216  22.6  40.0  82.7  74.8 

Waverly  Pike County  6,850  28.5  39.2  82.1  80.7 

Wilmington  Clinton Field  ‐  57.9  74.3  68.3  75.7 

GA Level 4                   Caldwell  Noble County*  50,000  72.7  14.2  70.8  59.3 

Dayton  Moraine Air Park*  235,830  60.4  57.4  76.8  74.5 

Deshler  Deshler Municipal Landing Strip*  Unpaved 

East Liverpool  Columbiana County  17,560  77.7  54.1  77.5  61.2 

Georgetown  Brown County  ‐  72.6  74.3  72.4  73.4 

Kelleys Island  Kelleys Island Municipal  13,160  76.9  24.4  76.7  78.0 

McConnelsville  Morgan County*  19,720  71.4  19.2  71.2  39.5 

Middle Bass  Middle Bass Island Airport  139,125  60.7  58.2  77.1  89.0 

Mount Gilead  Morrow County  24,810  77.9  60.6  77.7  84.3 

Page 24: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐24

Table8‐66‐10YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

6‐10 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

6‐10 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

New Lexington  Perry County  86,445  15.7  34.1  87.3  69.7 

North Bass Island  North Bass Island  23,681  16.0  28.4  87.3  93.2 

Put‐In‐Bay  Put In Bay  267,062  79.2  16.7  79.0  64.7 

Upper Sandusky  Wyandot County  ‐  70.4  73.8  70.2  73.6 

Washington Court House  Fayette County  176,386  44.2  50.9  81.3  61.0 

West Union  Alexander Salamon  30,100  74.2  8.2  74.1  0.0 

Willard  Willard*  ‐  72.4  76.2  71.7  76.1 

Woodsfield  Monroe County  29,940  70.9  61.6  70.7  74.7 

*Non‐NPIAS airport Source: Ohio Department of Transportation, RS&H 

Page 25: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐25

Table8‐711‐20YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

11‐20 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

11‐20 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

GA Level 1                   Akron  Akron Fulton International  288,345  13.3  39.8  74.3  75.9 

Ashtabula  Northeast Ohio Regional  455,740  33.2  40.7  73.3  70.2 

Bluffton  Bluffton  328,650  54.2  32.5  81.9  54.8 

Bowling Green  Wood County  988,139  64.9  60.6  76.4  75.8 

Chillicothe  Ross County  513,020  54.8  64.3  81.8  73.4 

Cincinnati  Cincinnati Municipal‐Lunken Field  736,970  16.4  16.9  73.7  76.4 

Cleveland  Burke Lakefront  Data Unavailable 

Cleveland  Cuyahoga County  255,193  22.3  42.1  74.6  62.6 

Columbus  Bolton Field  885,625  24.9  48.2  75.7  71.5 

Columbus  Ohio State University  855,890  67.2  44.5  67.4  67.7 

Coshocton  Richard Downing  367,410  47.5  50.9  75.8  76.7 

Dayton  Dayton‐Wright Brothers  475,328  70.4  45.2  70.2  74.6 

Defiance  Defiance Memorial  472,232  61.9  62.0  79.3  73.9 

Delaware  Delaware Municipal‐Jim Moore Field  723,170  49.2  58.9  85.5  71.5 

Hamilton  Butler County Regional  646,178  57.2  38.9  80.3  71.6 

Lebanon  Warren County/John Lane Field  ‐  28.0  10.4  73.8  64.4 

Lima  Lima Allen County  1,199,000  64.2  67.5  79.7  72.7 

Lorain/Elyria  Lorain County Regional  91,450  18.7  23.2  72.7  73.5 

Mansfield  Mansfield Lahm Regional  2,542,295  67.1  21.2  71.1  78.5 

Marion  Marion Municipal  860,348  20.5  45.2  73.6  79.1 

Marysville  Union County  355,995  64.0  44.0  77.2  72.9 

Middletown  Middletown Regional/Hook Field  997,660  52.0  46.4  83.5  81.0 

Ottawa  Putnam County  73,000  13.2  41.4  73.7  61.6 

Portsmouth  Greater Portsmouth Regional  352,790  32.6  45.5  80.0  78.3 

Sidney  Sidney Municipal  249,978  72.7  55.3  72.5  70.1 

Springfield  Springfield‐Beckley Municipal  1,136,299  55.2  42.8  73.4  76.5 

Tiffin  Seneca County  62,750  69.1  50.4  68.8  70.7 

Toledo  Toledo Executive  923,930  68.5  51.8  70.0  72.2 

Wapakoneta  Neil Armstrong  715,995  61.6  46.5  78.5  74.8 

Willoughby  Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal  108,978  21.2  26.7  73.1  79.4 

Page 26: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐26

Table8‐711‐20YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

11‐20 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

11‐20 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Wilmington  Wilmington Air Park*  Data Unavailable 

Wooster  Wayne County  217,290  27.1  21.0  73.8  73.7 

Zanesville  Zanesville Municipal  846,629  54.6  25.9  82.5  77.8 

GA Level 2                   Athens/Albany  Ohio University‐Snyder Field  697,340  36.9  50.1  75.9  78.5 

Bellefontaine  Bellefontaine Regional  787,000  61.3  58.7  77.5  75.2 

Bryan  Williams County  53,676  17.7  36.6  72.7  78.5 

Circleville  Pickaway County Memorial  649,027  49.4  56.5  85.5  75.6 

Findlay  Findlay  1,160,366  35.0  52.7  77.2  73.6 

Fostoria  Fostoria Metropolitan  522,636  66.3  57.3  76.6  74.9 

Fremont  Sandusky County Regional  735,469  51.4  55.7  83.9  77.1 

Jackson  James A. Rhodes  237,170  45.6  36.6  74.2  68.8 

Lancaster  Fairfield County  438,013  26.7  54.3  76.5  74.8 

Millersburg  Holmes County  109,695  72.7  38.4  72.5  73.6 

Mount Vernon  Knox County  803,777  62.3  51.6  78.6  69.1 

New Philadelphia  Harry Clever Field  157,792  17.3  60.1  72.7  83.9 

Newark  Newark‐Heath  98,544  71.6  31.9  71.4  75.6 

Oxford  Miami University  43,200  19.6  48.6  73.7  54.1 

Port Clinton  Carl R. Keller Field  140,720  70.0  41.0  69.7  74.6 

Ravenna  Portage County  190,250  13.8  35.5  73.7  75.6 

Urbana  Grimes Field  895,040  56.2  44.7  80.7  76.6 

Wauseon  Fulton County  388,730  61.4  44.8  77.5  64.8 

GA Level 3                   Ashland  Ashland County  345,150  64.2  60.6  76.2  69.2 

Barnesville  Barnesville‐Bradfield  30,050  22.4  27.3  74.7  77.0 

Batavia  Clermont County  195,120  72.1  50.4  72.3  71.5 

Bucyrus  Port Bucyrus‐Crawford County  170,865  34.8  49.2  80.9  72.4 

Cadiz  Harrison County  118,270  56.2  40.7  72.3  71.9 

Cambridge  Cambridge Municipal  26,382  25.8  47.1  74.0  71.9 

Carrollton  Carroll County‐Tolson  411,339  56.5  53.8  81.7  74.2 

Celina  Lakefield  498,860  67.5  59.4  71.5  73.4 

Page 27: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐27

Table8‐711‐20YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

11‐20 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

11‐20 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Chesapeake/Huntington, WV  Lawrence County Airpark  14,095  6.2  33.7  74.4  72.5 

Dayton  Greene County‐Lewis A. Jackson Regional  471,899  59.2  59.4  80.3  65.0 

Galion  Galion Municipal  457,553  68.0  61.8  71.8  66.6 

Gallipolis  Gallia‐Meigs Regional  71,520  12.1  42.9  74.7  74.7 

Harrison  Cincinnati West  188,604  56.5  49.8  83.4  69.1 

Hillsboro  Highland County  267,732  58.2  68.0  78.9  67.8 

Kent  Kent State University  413,600  51.7  39.7  78.6  73.7 

Kenton  Hardin County  45,000  42.9  26.2  72.6  39.2 

London  Madison County  556,490  47.6  51.2  85.4  72.2 

McArthur  Vinton County  ‐  17.4  12.7  72.7  64.7 

Medina  Medina Municipal  234,147  36.0  26.6  77.2  73.7 

Middlefield  Geauga County  108,548  69.0  33.3  68.8  74.1 

Napoleon  Henry County  305,180  59.8  27.2  79.6  18.0 

Norwalk  Norwalk‐Huron County  134,401  22.4  34.6  75.6  78.5 

Piqua  Piqua Airport‐Hartzell Field*  ‐  38.8  16.2  82.6  78.9 

Steubenville  Jefferson County Airpark  54,000  45.7  25.7  74.2  54.8 

Van Wert  Van Wert County  501,940  66.5  38.3  72.8  74.8 

Versailles  Darke County  ‐  68.9  26.9  68.7  78.4 

Wadsworth  Wadsworth Municipal  145,090  15.7  30.3  73.7  76.9 

Waverly  Pike County  18,400  17.1  25.4  73.4  71.9 

Wilmington  Clinton Field  325,995  36.9  64.3  85.1  72.0 

GA Level 4                   Caldwell  Noble County*  253,318  59.5  7.5  82.2  73.6 

Dayton  Moraine Air Park*  49,350  37.0  45.0  82.6  73.5 

Deshler  Deshler Municipal Landing Strip*  Unpaved 

East Liverpool  Columbiana County  125,670  70.1  41.8  69.9  67.5 

Georgetown  Brown County  284,550  59.0  63.1  79.2  69.4 

Kelleys Island  Kelleys Island Municipal  ‐  69.1  15.7  68.8  74.8 

McConnelsville  Morgan County*  232,660  55.9  12.7  80.6  49.9 

Middle Bass  Middle Bass Island Airport  17,720  37.5  36.6  82.6  77.2 

Mount Gilead  Morrow County  23,631  70.4  48.4  70.2  74.8 

Page 28: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐28

Table8‐711‐20YearPCIProjectionsforPreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Associated City    Airport Name  Affected 

Area (sq ft) 

11‐20 Year PCI: With Preventative Maintenance 

11‐20 Year PCI: With Major Rehabilitation 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

Primary Runway  

All Other Pavements 

New Lexington  Perry County  14,450  4.2  24.6  75.7  77.6 

North Bass Island  North Bass Island  ‐  5.3  17.0  75.7  78.0 

Put‐In‐Bay  Put In Bay  ‐  71.6  8.5  71.4  80.9 

Upper Sandusky  Wyandot County  308,500  53.7  64.1  82.3  68.6 

Washington Court House  Fayette County  47,070  24.8  40.8  73.6  77.4 

West Union  Alexander Salamon  250,400  63.4  3.6  75.6  0.0 

Willard  Willard*  297,700  58.6  68.0  80.8  67.7 

Woodsfield  Monroe County  290,530  54.7  53.8  82.5  71.1 

*Non‐NPIAS airport Source: Ohio Department of Transportation, RS&H 

Page 29: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

    

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐29

LikeprojectedPCIscores,estimatedcostsofpavementmaintenanceprojectsweresplitbetweeneachairport’sprimaryrunwayandtherestofitsairsidepavement.Table8‐8summarizesestimatedcostsofprimaryrunwayandotherpavementmaintenancebyairportclassificationlevel.System‐wide,itisestimatedthatprimaryrunwaymaintenancewillcostover$188millionduringthe20‐yearplanningperiod,whileallotherairportpavementswillcostover$268million.

Table8‐8SummaryofEstimatedPavementMaintenanceCosts:

PrimaryRunwayandAllOtherPavements

Classification Level 

20 Year Pavement Maintenance Cost 

Primary Runway 

All Other Pavements 

Combined Airport Pavement 

GA Level 1  $91,884,000  $172,139,000  $264,023,000 

GA Level 2  $33,775,000  $46,682,000  $80,457,000 

GA Level 3  $44,058,000  $34,549,000  $78,607,000 

GA Level 4  $18,756,000  $15,387,000  $34,143,000 

Full System  $188,473,000  $268,757,000  $457,230,000 

Source: Ohio Department of Transportation, RS&H 

TheestimatedcostofmaintainingOhio’sairportpavementswasalsosplitbetweenpreventativemaintenanceandmajorrehabilitationprojects.Table8‐9summarizesthesecostsbyairportclassificationlevel.System‐wide,itisestimatedthatpreventativemaintenanceprojectswillcostover$127millionoverthe20‐yearplanningperiod,whilemajorrehabilitationprojectsareexpectedtocostover$329million.

Table8‐9SummaryofEstimatedPavementMaintenanceCosts:PreventativeMaintenanceandMajorRehabilitation

Classification Level 

20 Year Pavement Maintenance Cost 

Preventative Maintenance 

Major Rehabilitation  Total 

GA Level 1  $69,337,000  $194,686,000  $264,023,000 

GA Level 2  $26,618,000  $53,839,000  $80,457,000 

GA Level 3  $22,627,000  $55,980,000  $78,607,000 

GA Level 4  $8,877,000  $25,266,000  $34,143,000 

Full System  $127,459,000  $329,771,000  $457,230,000 

Source: Ohio Department of Transportation, RS&H 

Lastly,thesepavementcostsweresplitintothe1‐5years,6‐10years,and11‐20yearplanningphases.Table8‐10summarizesthesecostsbyplanningphaseandclassificationlevel.System‐wide,itisestimatedthatpavementmaintenancewillcostduring$116millionduringthe1‐5yearsphase,over$105millionduringthe6‐10yearsphase,andover$234millionduringthe11‐20yearsphase.

Page 30: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

    

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐30

Table8‐10SummaryofEstimatedPavementMaintenanceCosts:

EstimatedCostsPerPlanningPeriod

Classification Level 

20 Year Pavement Maintenance Cost 

1‐5 Years  6‐10 Years  11‐20 Years  Total 

GA Level 1  $70,504,000  $64,514,000  $129,005,000  $264,023,000 

GA Level 2  $15,381,000  $15,067,000  $50,009,000  $80,457,000 

GA Level 3  $22,405,000  $14,623,000  $41,579,000  $78,607,000 

GA Level 4  $8,464,000  $11,357,000  $14,322,000  $34,143,000 

Full System  $116,754,000  $105,561,000  $234,915,000  $457,230,000 

Source: Ohio Department of Transportation, RS&H 

Table8‐11presentsdetailedpavementmaintenancecostsforallgeneralaviationairportsintheOhiosystem.Thesecostsareestimatedprojectionsbasedoncurrentpavementconditionsandsizes.Suchestimatesdonottakeintoaccountrunwayextensionsorotherpavementalterations,includingthoseestimatedelsewhereinthisstudy.

Page 31: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐31

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

GA Level 1                      

Akron  Akron‐Canton Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $168,000 

         Major rehab  $9,541,000     Major rehab  $803,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $10,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $275,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $4,687,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,790,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,243,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,055,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $11,341,000  Other Pavements Total:  $8,231,000 

Ashtabula  Northeast Ohio Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $14,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $22,000 

         Major rehab  $976,000     Major rehab  $169,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $133,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $139,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,399,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $800,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $560,000 

         Major rehab  $999,000     Major rehab  $822,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,922,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,111,000 

Bluffton  Bluffton  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $128,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $1,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $714,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $280,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $13,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $90,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $99,000 

         Major rehab  $1,130,000     Major rehab  $76,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,628,000  Other Pavements Total:  $903,000 

Bowling Green  Wood County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $26,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $177,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $108,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $157,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $515,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $400,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $699,000 

         Major rehab  $1,134,000     Major rehab  $2,388,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,717,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,887,000 

Page 32: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐32

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Chillicothe  Ross County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $209,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $73,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $468,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $247,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $186,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $833,000 

         Major rehab  $1,928,000     Major rehab  $510,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,791,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,663,000 

Cincinnati  Cincinnati Municipal‐Lunken Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $474,000 

         Major rehab  $4,064,000     Major rehab  $5,782,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $18,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $139,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $5,176,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,379,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $2,022,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $4,576,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $5,461,000  Other Pavements Total:  $18,169,000 

Cleveland  Burke Lakefront  Data Unavailable: No Pavement Recommendations Made 

Cleveland  Cuyahoga County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $25,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $113,000 

         Major rehab  $2,314,000     Major rehab  $1,771,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $62,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $430,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $688,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $780,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,951,000 

         Major rehab  $152,000     Major rehab  $1,193,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $3,333,000  Other Pavements Total:  $6,146,000 

Columbus  Bolton Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $104,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $142,000 

         Major rehab  $1,369,000     Major rehab  $41,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $439,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $33,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $578,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $806,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $4,943,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,051,000  Other Pavements Total:  $6,404,000 

Page 33: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐33

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Columbus  Ohio State University  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $13,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $395,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,934,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $204,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $752,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $2,000,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $770,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,694,000 

         Major rehab  $259,000     Major rehab  $5,424,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,246,000  Other Pavements Total:  $12,199,000 

Coshocton  Richard Downing  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $140,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $63,000 

         Major rehab  $765,000     Major rehab  $1,112,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $27,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $208,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $369,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $635,000 

         Major rehab  $289,000     Major rehab  $1,074,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,590,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,092,000 

Dayton  Dayton‐Wright Brothers  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $185,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $66,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $110,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $281,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $595,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $916,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $582,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $2,117,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,026,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,826,000 

Defiance  Defiance Memorial  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $65,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $36,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $30,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $196,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $140,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $261,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $448,000 

         Major rehab  $1,059,000     Major rehab  $681,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,581,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,335,000 

Page 34: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐34

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Delaware  Delaware Municipal‐Jim Moore Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $248,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $117,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $318,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $466,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $274,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $13,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $824,000 

         Major rehab  $1,506,000     Major rehab  $859,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,233,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,392,000 

Hamilton  Butler County Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $127,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $43,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $2,487,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $313,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $253,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $100,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $282,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,208,000 

         Major rehab  $1,582,000     Major rehab  $1,367,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,304,000  Other Pavements Total:  $5,458,000 

Lebanon  Warren County/John Lane Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $26,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $639,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $22,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $103,000     Major rehab  $1,512,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $452,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $50,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,242,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,562,000 

Lima  Lima Allen County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $234,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $39,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $36,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $603,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $275,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $693,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,047,000 

         Major rehab  $2,574,000     Major rehab  $1,651,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $4,104,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,048,000 

Page 35: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐35

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Lorain/Elyria  Lorain County Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $176,000 

         Major rehab  $1,295,000     Major rehab  $330,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $32,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $76,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $6,876,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $853,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $831,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $985,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,180,000  Other Pavements Total:  $9,274,000 

Mansfield  Mansfield Lahm Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $39,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $301,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $8,590,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $588,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $788,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $9,298,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $2,220,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $2,216,000 

         Major rehab  $6,203,000     Major rehab  $4,997,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $9,050,000  Other Pavements Total:  $26,190,000 

Marion  Marion Municipal  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $303,000 

         Major rehab  $1,155,000     Major rehab  $162,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $13,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $634,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $2,479,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $760,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $669,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $3,041,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,928,000  Other Pavements Total:  $7,288,000 

Marysville  Union County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $48,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $18,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $214,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $183,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $133,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,452,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $315,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $580,000 

         Major rehab  $1,184,000     Major rehab  $129,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,730,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,526,000 

Page 36: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐36

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Middletown  Middletown Regional/Hook Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $280,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $173,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $598,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $322,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,247,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $26,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $287,000 

         Major rehab  $2,093,000     Major rehab  $1,368,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,997,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,397,000 

Ottawa  Putnam County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $18,000 

         Major rehab  $1,765,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $6,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $65,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $551,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $429,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $130,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $257,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,200,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,021,000 

Portsmouth  Greater Portsmouth Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $370,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $161,000 

         Major rehab  $266,000     Major rehab  $297,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $309,000 

         Major rehab  $1,121,000     Major rehab  $26,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $244,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $103,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,212,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,001,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,108,000 

Sidney  Sidney Municipal  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $67,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $23,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $221,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $128,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $562,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $448,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $868,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $585,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,732,000 

Page 37: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐37

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Springfield  Springfield‐Beckley Municipal  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $183,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $446,000 

         Major rehab  $2,501,000     Major rehab  $3,508,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $486,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $652,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $877,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $2,149,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $2,393,000 

         Major rehab  $1,655,000     Major rehab  $3,255,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $6,974,000  Other Pavements Total:  $11,131,000 

Tiffin  Seneca County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $14,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $98,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $93,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $101,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $504,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $332,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $390,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $597,000  Other Pavements Total:  $935,000 

Toledo  Toledo Executive  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $6,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $110,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $56,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $206,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $316,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $391,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $934,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,011,000 

         Major rehab  $1,194,000     Major rehab  $3,552,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,340,000  Other Pavements Total:  $5,436,000 

Wapakoneta  Neil Armstrong  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $135,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $39,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $363,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $376,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $170,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,124,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $456,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $575,000 

         Major rehab  $2,093,000     Major rehab  $638,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $3,060,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,909,000 

Page 38: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐38

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Willoughby  Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $17,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $435,000 

         Major rehab  $1,627,000     Major rehab  $1,178,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $32,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $39,000 

         Major rehab  $79,000     Major rehab  $2,601,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $928,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $524,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $898,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,683,000  Other Pavements Total:  $5,675,000 

Wilmington  Wilmington Air Park*  Data Unavailable: No Pavement Recommendations Made 

Wooster  Wayne County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $2,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $32,000 

         Major rehab  $2,426,000     Major rehab  $97,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $26,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $83,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $109,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $770,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $188,000 

         Major rehab  $141,000     Major rehab  $1,299,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $3,365,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,808,000 

Zanesville  Zanesville Municipal  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $286,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $182,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $2,289,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $641,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $84,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $5,117,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $216,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,231,000 

         Major rehab  $2,481,000     Major rehab  $380,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $3,624,000  Other Pavements Total:  $9,283,000 

GA Level 2                      

Athens/Albany  Ohio University‐Snyder Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $57,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $190,000 

         Major rehab  $1,050,000     Major rehab  $148,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $134,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $466,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $662,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $377,000 

         Major rehab  $493,000     Major rehab  $2,081,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,396,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,262,000 

Page 39: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐39

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Bellefontaine  Bellefontaine Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $96,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $111,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $313,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $264,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $120,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $481,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $486,000 

         Major rehab  $1,937,000     Major rehab  $1,312,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,827,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,293,000 

Bryan  Williams County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $1,170,000     Major rehab  $9,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $24,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $7,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $839,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $661,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $207,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $685,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,855,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,747,000 

Circleville  Pickaway County Memorial  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $160,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $65,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $196,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $314,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $209,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $9,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $415,000 

         Major rehab  $974,000     Major rehab  $1,205,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,457,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,090,000 

Findlay  Findlay  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $192,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $328,000 

         Major rehab  $754,000     Major rehab  $104,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $123,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $603,000 

         Major rehab  $538,000     Major rehab  $900,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $670,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $2,291,000 

         Major rehab  $421,000     Major rehab  $4,340,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,698,000  Other Pavements Total:  $8,566,000 

Page 40: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐40

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Fostoria  Fostoria Metropolitan  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $70,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $20,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $686,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $270,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $99,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $416,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $549,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $489,000 

         Major rehab  $1,537,000     Major rehab  $372,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,426,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,082,000 

Fremont  Sandusky County Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $225,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $78,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $481,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $192,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $401,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $0  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $336,000 

         Major rehab  $1,624,000     Major rehab  $913,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,330,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,920,000 

Jackson  James A. Rhodes  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $23,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $11,000 

         Major rehab  $861,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $87,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $63,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $429,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $582,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $181,000 

         Major rehab  $393,000     Major rehab  $644,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,946,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,328,000 

Lancaster  Fairfield County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $121,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $228,000 

         Major rehab  $673,000     Major rehab  $98,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $403,000 

         Major rehab  $353,000     Major rehab  $356,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $360,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $566,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,688,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,507,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,339,000 

Page 41: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐41

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Millersburg  Holmes County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $63,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $79,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $16,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $64,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $110,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $398,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $62,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $594,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $414,000  Other Pavements Total:  $972,000 

Mount Vernon  Knox County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $102,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $42,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $144,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $339,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $179,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $115,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $506,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $485,000 

         Major rehab  $1,942,000     Major rehab  $975,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,889,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,940,000 

New Philadelphia  Harry Clever Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $73,000 

         Major rehab  $1,283,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $25,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $160,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $115,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $676,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $244,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $536,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,984,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,128,000 

Newark  Newark‐Heath  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $9,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,421,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $52,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $34,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $63,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $742,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $412,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $533,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $794,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,472,000 

Page 42: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐42

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Oxford  Miami University  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $19,000 

         Major rehab  $740,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $7,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $74,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $452,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $171,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $149,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,199,000  Other Pavements Total:  $413,000 

Port Clinton  Carl R. Keller Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $188,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $820,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $140,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $280,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $3,188,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $983,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $1,190,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $556,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,123,000  Other Pavements Total:  $6,222,000 

Ravenna  Portage County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $23,000 

         Major rehab  $1,573,000     Major rehab  $504,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $5,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $76,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $569,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $391,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $242,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,563,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,969,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,977,000 

Urbana  Grimes Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $151,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $112,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $163,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $352,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $259,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $156,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $224,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $469,000 

         Major rehab  $1,599,000     Major rehab  $2,099,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,326,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,258,000 

Page 43: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐43

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Wauseon  Fulton County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $55,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $49,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $44,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $181,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $104,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $279,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $110,000 

         Major rehab  $1,120,000     Major rehab  $366,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,635,000  Other Pavements Total:  $673,000 

GA Level 3                      

Ashland  Ashland County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $25,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $9,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $135,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $76,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $302,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $356,000 

         Major rehab  $976,000     Major rehab  $345,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,438,000  Other Pavements Total:  $786,000 

Barnesville  Barnesville‐Bradfield  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $3,000 

         Major rehab  $659,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $13,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $930,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $332,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $133,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $362,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $991,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,441,000 

Batavia  Clermont County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $53,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $208,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $25,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $179,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $321,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $502,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $355,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $757,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $527,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,873,000 

Page 44: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐44

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Bucyrus  Port Bucyrus‐Crawford County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $250,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $65,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $152,000 

         Major rehab  $855,000     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $116,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $91,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $598,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,221,000  Other Pavements Total:  $906,000 

Cadiz  Harrison County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $10,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $26,000 

         Major rehab  $809,000     Major rehab  $197,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $81,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $30,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $52,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $491,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $159,000 

         Major rehab  $389,000     Major rehab  $189,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,780,000  Other Pavements Total:  $653,000 

Cambridge  Cambridge Municipal  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $46,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $11,000 

         Major rehab  $720,000     Major rehab  $272,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $17,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $42,000 

         Major rehab  $158,000     Major rehab  $221,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $480,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $170,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $100,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,421,000  Other Pavements Total:  $816,000 

Carrollton  Carroll County‐Tolson  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $127,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $23,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $41,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $284,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $85,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $109,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $180,000 

         Major rehab  $1,170,000     Major rehab  $465,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,690,000  Other Pavements Total:  $794,000 

Page 45: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐45

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Celina  Lakefield  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $7,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $24,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $139,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $94,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $536,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $172,000 

         Major rehab  $1,484,000     Major rehab  $611,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,166,000  Other Pavements Total:  $901,000 

Chesapeake/Huntington, WV  Lawrence County Airpark  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $23,000 

         Major rehab  $1,584,000     Major rehab  $79,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $5,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $9,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $473,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $277,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $54,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $51,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,866,000  Other Pavements Total:  $689,000 

Dayton Greene County‐Lewis A. Jackson Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $109,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $30,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $274,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $146,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $215,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $468,000 

         Major rehab  $1,308,000     Major rehab  $376,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,906,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,020,000 

Galion  Galion Municipal  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $5,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $5,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $142,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $78,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $562,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $321,000 

         Major rehab  $1,537,000     Major rehab  $298,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,246,000  Other Pavements Total:  $702,000 

Page 46: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐46

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Gallipolis  Gallia‐Meigs Regional  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $12,000 

         Major rehab  $2,460,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $70,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,069,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $381,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $209,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $294,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,841,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,654,000 

Harrison  Cincinnati West  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $80,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $22,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $12,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $141,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $39,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $97,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $56,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $206,000 

         Major rehab  $625,000     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $902,000  Other Pavements Total:  $376,000 

Hillsboro  Highland County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $76,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $4,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $193,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $79,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $187,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $339,000 

         Major rehab  $1,028,000     Major rehab  $15,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,484,000  Other Pavements Total:  $437,000 

Kent  Kent State University  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $76,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $175,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $185,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $131,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $208,000 

         Major rehab  $151,000     Major rehab  $135,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $194,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $102,000 

         Major rehab  $728,000     Major rehab  $731,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,280,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,536,000 

Page 47: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐47

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Kenton  Hardin County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $1,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $2,000 

         Major rehab  $862,000     Major rehab  $2,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $38,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $31,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $144,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $606,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $131,000 

         Major rehab  $189,000     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,696,000  Other Pavements Total:  $310,000 

London  Madison County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $159,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $86,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $245,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $215,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $174,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $8,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $336,000 

         Major rehab  $979,000     Major rehab  $1,338,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,391,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,149,000 

McArthur  Vinton County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $914,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $18,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $695,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $493,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $37,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,425,000  Other Pavements Total:  $732,000 

Medina  Medina Municipal  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $12,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $128,000 

         Major rehab  $2,169,000     Major rehab  $1,000,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $32,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $77,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $639,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $237,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $371,000 

         Major rehab  $170,000     Major rehab  $1,840,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,620,000  Other Pavements Total:  $4,055,000 

Page 48: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐48

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Middlefield  Geauga County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $34,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $48,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $72,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $28,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $788,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $391,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $124,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $676,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $463,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,698,000 

Napoleon  Henry County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $70,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $1,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $198,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $7,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $213,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $22,000 

         Major rehab  $1,032,000     Major rehab  $53,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,513,000  Other Pavements Total:  $83,000 

Norwalk  Norwalk‐Huron County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $59,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $31,000 

         Major rehab  $838,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $31,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $340,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $44,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $1,242,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,237,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,348,000 

Piqua  Piqua Airport‐Hartzell Field*  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $223,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $66,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $865,000     Major rehab  $1,452,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $82,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $96,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,236,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,548,000 

Page 49: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐49

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Steubenville  Jefferson County Airpark  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $14,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $495,000     Major rehab  $624,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $19,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $2,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $351,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $147,000 

         Major rehab  $209,000     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,088,000  Other Pavements Total:  $773,000 

Van Wert  Van Wert County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $13,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $68,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $71,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $149,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $92,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $270,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $524,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $271,000 

         Major rehab  $1,422,000     Major rehab  $794,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,108,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,566,000 

Versailles  Darke County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $88,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $349,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $106,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $217,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $569,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $119,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $675,000  Other Pavements Total:  $773,000 

Wadsworth  Wadsworth Municipal  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $51,000 

         Major rehab  $1,298,000     Major rehab  $908,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $5,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $129,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $182,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $395,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $262,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $603,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,698,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,135,000 

Page 50: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐50

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Waverly  Pike County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $38,000 

         Major rehab  $1,502,000     Major rehab  $1,569,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $12,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $11,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $19,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $588,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $286,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $90,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $2,102,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,013,000 

Wilmington  Clinton Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $119,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $13,000 

         Major rehab  $17,000     Major rehab  $7,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $183,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $83,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $14,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $293,000 

         Major rehab  $714,000     Major rehab  $386,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,047,000  Other Pavements Total:  $782,000 

GA Level 4                      

Caldwell  Noble County*  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $92,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $366,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $209,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $611,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $78,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $43,000 

         Major rehab  $835,000     Major rehab  $39,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,214,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,059,000 

Dayton  Moraine Air Park*  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $180,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $7,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $63,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $49,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $49,000 

         Major rehab  $715,000     Major rehab  $105,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $62,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $170,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $176,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,006,000  Other Pavements Total:  $570,000 

Deshler  Deshler Municipal Landing Strip*  Unpaved Runway 

Page 51: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐51

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

East Liverpool  Columbiana County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $26,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $17,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $66,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $88,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $160,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $527,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $248,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $754,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $593,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,293,000 

Georgetown  Brown County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $60,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $28,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $160,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $89,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $168,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $140,000 

         Major rehab  $845,000     Major rehab  $215,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,233,000  Other Pavements Total:  $472,000 

Kelleys Island  Kelleys Island Land Field  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $924,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $34,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $6,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $166,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $186,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $150,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $220,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,246,000 

McConnelsville  Morgan County*  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $79,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $1,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $184,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $3,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $234,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $117,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $10,000 

         Major rehab  $840,000     Major rehab  $36,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,220,000  Other Pavements Total:  $284,000 

Page 52: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐52

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Middle Bass  Middle Bass Island Airport  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $108,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $151,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $879,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $32,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $14,000 

         Major rehab  $427,000     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $38,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $300,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $58,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $605,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,402,000 

Mount Gilead  Morrow County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $24,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $205,000 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $50,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $24,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $175,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $417,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $231,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $91,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $467,000  Other Pavements Total:  $750,000 

New Lexington  Perry County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $1,000 

         Major rehab  $2,768,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $10,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $851,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $276,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $80,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $168,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $3,044,000  Other Pavements Total:  $1,110,000 

North Bass Island  North Bass Island  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $1,139,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $159,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $114,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $16,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,253,000  Other Pavements Total:  $175,000 

Page 53: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐53

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Put‐In‐Bay  Put In Bay  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $30,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $3,170,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $425,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $106,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $455,000  Other Pavements Total:  $3,276,000 

Upper Sandusky  Wyandot County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $120,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $5,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $266,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $36,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $78,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $144,000 

         Major rehab  $1,042,000     Major rehab  $65,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,506,000  Other Pavements Total:  $250,000 

Washington Court House  Fayette County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $29,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $11,000 

         Major rehab  $949,000     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $20,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $56,000 

         Major rehab  $101,000     Major rehab  $1,716,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $615,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $209,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $291,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,714,000  Other Pavements Total:  $2,283,000 

West Union  Alexander Salamon  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $28,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $125,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $327,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $264,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $18,000 

         Major rehab  $907,000     Major rehab  $322,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,324,000  Other Pavements Total:  $667,000 

Page 54: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS                              2014 

  

 

OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐54

Table8‐11DetailedPavementMaintenanceCostEstimatesfor5,10,and20YearPlanningPeriods

Associated City  Airport Name 

Primary Runway  All Other Pavements 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Planning Period 

Type of Maintenance 

Estimated Cost 

Willard  Willard*  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $93,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $0 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $227,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $9,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $159,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $35,000 

         Major rehab  $1,040,000     Major rehab  $0 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,519,000  Other Pavements Total:  $44,000 

Woodsfield  Monroe County  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $109,000  1‐5 Years:  Preventative  $2,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $0 

      6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $244,000  6‐10 Years:  Preventative  $15,000 

         Major rehab  $0     Major rehab  $345,000 

      11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $87,000  11‐20 Years:  Preventative  $117,000 

         Major rehab  $943,000     Major rehab  $27,000 

      Primary Runway Total:  $1,383,000  Other Pavements Total:  $506,000 

Source: RS&H 

Page 55: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐55

Section 2: Recommendations Related to Performance Benchmarks Section1coveredtherecommendedactionsandassociatedcostsrecommendedforsystemairportstomeetRSA,RPZ,andpavementmaintenancecompliancefactors.Section2willdiscusstheperformancebenchmarks(asoutlinedinChapter5,AirportClassificationsandFacilityObjectives),therecommendedprojectsforeachairporttomeetthoseperformancebenchmarks,andtheestimatedcostsassociatedwiththerecommendedprojects.Therecommendationsandcostestimatespresentedinthissectionareplanninglevel,andarenotmeanttoreplacedetailedengineeringstudiesortosupersedeworkdoneasaresultofairportmasterplans.

Performance Benchmarks by Role AnumberofdifferentcriteriawereusedtoclassifyOhio’sairportsandthenspecificfacilityandserviceobjectiveswereestablishedtoprovidebenchmarkstomeasureboththeperformanceofthesystemandidentifyareasofimprovementforindividualairportsthatwillallowthesystemtoperformmoreefficiently.Theseobjectivespresenttheminimumlevelofdevelopmentthattheairportshouldstrivefortomeetitsrecommendedsystemclassification.Whereairportsmaybeinexcessofdefinedobjectives,reductionorremovaloffacilitiesandserviceswerenotconsidered.Itispossiblethatairportsmaybeunabletomeetallfacilityandserviceobjectivesforitsclassification;however,thisdoesnotnecessarilyprecludethatairportfromfulfillingitsrecommendedsystemclassification.Table8‐12providesafulllistofeachfacilityobjectiveproposedforeachairportclassification.Itisimportanttorememberthatthefacilityrecommendationsarenotrequirements.Systemplanrecommendationsinnowayindicateeligibilityforfederalorstatefunding.Eachairport’smasterplan,aswellasuniquecircumstances,willdictatewhattypesoffacilitiesareneededatanindividualairport.Fromasystemperspectivetheseobjectivesallowabroadevaluationofthecurrentsystemtobemadeaswellasgeneralsystemrecommendationstobeprepared.

Table8‐12PerformanceBenchmarksforEachAirportClassification

    Turbine Airports  Piston Airports Performance Measure  Air Carrier  Level 1 Airports  Level 2 Airports  Level 3 Airports  Level 4 Airports 

Airport Reference  C‐III or higher  C‐II or higher  B‐II or higher  B‐I or higher  A‐I Small or 

Runway Length  6,500 ft. or more  5,000 ft. or more  4,000 ft. or more  3,200 ft. or more  1,800 ft. or more 

Runway Lighting  HIRL  HIRL  MIRL  MIRL  LIRL 

Airport Beacon  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 

Taxiway Type  Full parallel  Full parallel  Full parallel  Partial parallel  Turnaround 

Air Traffic Control  Yes  Yes, if Part 139  ‐‐  ‐‐  ‐‐ 

Air Traffic Control  Yes  Yes  Yes  ‐‐  ‐‐ 

Instrument Approach Procedure 

Precision  Precision or approach with vertical guidance 

Approach with vertical guidance 

Non‐precision  Visual 

Terminal/  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  ‐‐ 

Fuel  Jet‐A, 100LL  Jet‐A, 100LL  Jet‐A, 100LL  100LL  ‐‐ 

Weather Reporting  Weather observer or automated weather reporting 

Automated weather reporting 

Automated weather reporting 

Automated weather reporting 

Windsock 

Paved Aircraft  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  ‐‐ 

Approach Lighting  MALSR  MALSR  ‐‐  ‐‐  ‐‐ 

Visual Approach Aids  PAPI  PAPI  PAPI  PAPI  ‐‐ 

Snow Removal  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  ‐‐ 

Fencing  Perimeter  Perimeter  Airfield  As Needed  As Needed 

Source: CDM Smith. Prepared July 2013. 

Page 56: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐56

Projects Recommended to Meet Role Eachairport,baseduponitscurrentclassification,wasevaluatedagainstitsrespectivebenchmarkineachobjectivecategory.Projectswerethenrecommendedtomeetshortfalls.RecommendedprojectstomeetthefacilityandserviceobjectivesarepresentedinTable8‐13andarelistedbyairport,subdividedbyrole.Severalairports(17)arerecommendedtoaccommodateanupgradeinAirportReferenceCode(ARC).AnupgradeinARChasimplicationsonanumberofairportdesigncriteriaand,dependingonanairport’sparticularconfiguration,achangeindesigncriteriamayresultinanumberofadditionalprojectsinordertomeetFAAstandards.ManyoftheindividualprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarkswilloverlapwithprojectsassociatedwithanARCupgrade.Ofthe17airportsrecommendedforARCimprovementstomeetperformancebenchmarks,15areupgradesfromBtoCstandards.Thiswouldresultinmajorlayoutchanges,suchasextendedRSAdistances,taxiwayseparations,andrunwaywidths.Itisrecognizedthatitmaynotbepracticaltomakesuchfacilitychangesatmanyairports.

Itisimportanttokeepinmindthatanyrecommendedimprovementsarebasedonahighlevelanalysisofthesystemandstillneedtobevettedandsupportedbylocalplanningeffortsbyeachindividualairport.ItshouldnotbeinferredthattheprojectsincludedinthisdocumentmeetFAAjustificationcriteriaorthattheyareendorsedbytheFAAorODOT.Rather,thisdocumentservesasoneofmanyfactorstobeweighedbytheFAAandODOTintheoverallassessmentofOhioairportprojectfunding.

Table8‐13RecommendedUpgradesbyAirport

Associated City  Airport  Facility/Service Item  Current  Recommended Project 

Air Carrier Airports 

Akron  Akron‐Canton        No projects to meet objectives 

Cleveland  Cleveland‐Hopkins Int'l        No projects to meet objectives 

Columbus Port Columbus International        No projects to meet objectives 

Columbus Rickenbacker International        No projects to meet objectives 

Dayton James M. Cox Dayton Int'l        No projects to meet objectives 

Toledo  Toledo Express  Visual Approach Aids  N/V2L  PAPI 

Youngstown/ Warren 

Youngstown‐Warren Regional        No projects to meet objectives 

Level 1 Airports             Akron  Akron Fulton 

International   

Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  Precision or APV 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

   Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter Fencing 

Ashtabula Northeast Ohio Regional  Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

      Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  None  Full Perimeter 

Bluffton  Bluffton  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐I  C‐II Standards 

   Runway Length   4,126'   Primary Runway to 5,000' 

   Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

   Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

   Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  Precision or APV 

   Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

   Fencing  None  Full Perimeter 

Page 57: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐57

Table8‐13RecommendedUpgradesbyAirport

Associated City  Airport  Facility/Service Item  Current  Recommended Project 

Bowling Green  Wood County  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

      Runway Length   4,199'   Primary Runway to 5,000' 

      Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

      Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

      Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Chillicothe  Ross County  Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  None  Full Perimeter 

Cincinnati Cincinnati Municipal‐Lunken Field        No projects to meet objectives 

Cleveland  Burke Lakefront  No projects to meet objectives 

Cleveland  Cuyahoga County  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Columbus  Bolton Field  Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

Columbus  Ohio State University        No projects to meet objectives 

Coshocton  Richard Downing  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

   Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

   Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  Precision or APV 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

   Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Dayton  Dayton‐Wright Brothers  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

      Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

      Approach Lighting System (ALS)  N/MALS  MALSR 

Defiance  Defiance Memorial  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

   Runway Length   4,199'   Primary Runway to 5,000' 

   Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

   Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

   Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  Precision or APV 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

   Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Delaware Delaware Municipal‐Jim Moore Field  Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

      Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Hamilton  Butler County Regional  Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

      Approach Lighting System (ALS)  N/MALS  MALSR 

Lebanon Warren County/John Lane Field  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

      Runway Length   4,502'   Primary Runway to 5,000' 

      Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

      Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

      Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Snow Removal  None  Yes 

      Fencing  None  Full Perimeter 

Lima  Lima Allen County  Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

   Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Lorain/Elyria  Lorain County Regional  No projects to meet objectives 

Mansfield Mansfield Lahm Regional  No projects to meet objectives 

Page 58: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐58

Table8‐13RecommendedUpgradesbyAirport

Associated City  Airport  Facility/Service Item  Current  Recommended Project 

Marion  Marion Municipal  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Marysville  Union County  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

   Runway Length   4,218'   Primary Runway to 5,000' 

   Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

   Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  Precision or APV 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Middletown Middletown Regional/Hook Field  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Ottawa  Putnam County  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

   Runway Length   4,500'   Primary Runway to 5,000' 

   Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

   Taxiway  Turn‐around  Full Parallel Taxiway 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Portsmouth Greater Portsmouth Regional  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

    Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Sidney  Sidney Municipal  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

   Runway Length   4,785'   Primary Runway to 5,000'2 

   Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

   Taxiway  Stub  Full Parallel 

   Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  Precision or APV 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  None  Full Perimeter 

Springfield Springfield‐Beckley Municipal  Approach Lighting System (ALS)  SSALR/N  MALSR 

Tiffin  Seneca County  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

   Runway Length   4,000'   Primary Runway to 5,000' 

   Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

   Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  None  Full Perimeter 

Toledo  Toledo Executive  Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

      Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

      Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  Precision or APV 

      Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

      Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

2Projectnolongerneededasrunwayextensionrecentlycompletedorcurrentlyunderway

Page 59: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐59

Table8‐13RecommendedUpgradesbyAirport

Associated City  Airport  Facility/Service Item  Current  Recommended Project 

Wapakoneta  Neil Armstrong  Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

   Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

   Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  Partial  Full Perimeter 

Willoughby Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

      Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

      Taxiway  Turn‐around  Full Parallel 

      Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

      Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

Wilmington  Wilmington Air Park  Fuel  100LL  Jet‐A and 100LL 

Wooster  Wayne County  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐II  C‐II Standards 

      Runway Lighting  MIRL  HIRL 

      Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

      Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  None  Full Perimeter 

Zanesville  Zanesville Municipal  Approach Lighting System (ALS)  None  MALSR 

      Fencing  None  Full Perimeter 

Level 2 Airports             

Athens/Albany Ohio University‐Snyder Field        No projects to meet objectives 

Bellefontaine  Bellefontaine Regional        No projects to meet objectives 

Bryan  Williams County  Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel Taxiway 

   Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Circleville Pickaway County Memorial  Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  APV 

      Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Findlay  Findlay  No projects to meet objectives 

Fostoria  Fostoria Metropolitan  Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

Fremont Sandusky County Regional  No projects to meet objectives 

Jackson  James A. Rhodes  Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

      Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  APV 

      Visual Approach Aids  N/S2L PCL  PAPI 

Lancaster  Fairfield County  No projects to meet objectives 

Millersburg  Holmes County  Runway Length   3,498'   Primary Runway to 4,000' 

      Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

      Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  APV 

      Visual Approach Aids  N/V2L  PAPI 

Mount Vernon  Knox County  Fencing  None  Airfield Fencing 

New Philadelphia  Harry Clever Field  Runway Length   3,951'   Primary Runway to 4,000' 

      Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  APV 

Newark  Newark‐Heath  Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  APV 

Oxford  Miami University  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐I Small  B‐II Standards 

      Taxiway  Partial Parallel  Full Parallel 

Port Clinton  Carl R. Keller Field  No projects to meet objectives 

Ravenna  Portage County  Runway Length   3,499'   Primary Runway to 4,000' 

      Instrument Approach  Non‐Precision  APV 

Urbana  Grimes Field  No projects to meet objectives 

Page 60: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐60

Table8‐13RecommendedUpgradesbyAirport

Associated City  Airport  Facility/Service Item  Current  Recommended Project 

Wauseon  Fulton County  Airport Reference Code (ARC)  B‐I  B‐II Standards 

      Runway Length   3,882'   Primary Runway to 4,000' 

      Taxiway Partial Parallel & Turn‐around  Full Parallel 

Level 3 Airports             Ashland  Ashland County  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Barnesville  Barnesville‐Bradfield  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

      Visual Approach Aids  None  PAPI 

Batavia  Clermont County  No projects to meet objectives 

Bucyrus Port Bucyrus‐Crawford County  Snow Removal  None  Yes 

Cadiz  Harrison County  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Cambridge  Cambridge Municipal  Taxiway  None  Partial Parallel 

      Visual Approach Aids  V2L/V2L  PAPI 

Carrollton  Carroll County‐Tolson  Terminal Building  None  Yes 

   Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Celina  Lakefield  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Chesapeake/Huntington, WV 

Lawrence County Airpark  Runway Length   3,001'   Primary Runway to 3,200' 

   Runway Lighting  NSTD  MIRL 

   Taxiway  Turn‐arounds  Partial Parallel 

   Instrument Approach  Visual  Non‐Precision 

   Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

   Visual Approach Aids  None  PAPI 

Dayton Greene County‐Lewis A. Jackson Regional        No projects to meet objectives 

Galion  Galion Municipal  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Gallipolis  Gallia‐Meigs Regional  Taxiway  Turn‐arounds  Partial Parallel 

      Snow Removal  None  Yes 

Harrison  Cincinnati West  Runway Length   2,803'   Primary Runway to 3,200' 

   Taxiway  Turn‐around & Stub  Partial Parallel 

   Visual Approach Aids  None  PAPI 

   Snow Removal  None  Yes 

Hillsboro  Highland County        No projects to meet objectives 

Kent  Kent State University  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

      Visual Approach Aids  V4L/V4L  PAPI 

Kenton  Hardin County  Taxiway  Stub  Partial Parallel 

      Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

      Visual Approach Aids  None  PAPI 

London  Madison County  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

McArthur  Vinton County  Taxiway  Turn‐arounds  Partial Parallel 

      Instrument Approach  Visual  Non‐Precision 

      Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

      Snow Removal  None  Yes 

Medina  Medina Municipal  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Page 61: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐61

Table8‐13RecommendedUpgradesbyAirport

Associated City  Airport  Facility/Service Item  Current  Recommended Project 

Middlefield  Geauga County  Taxiway Turn‐around & Stubs  Partial Parallel 

      Instrument Approach  Circling  Non‐Precision 

      Terminal Building  None  Yes 

      Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

      Visual Approach Aids  None  PAPI 

      Snow Removal  None  Yes 

Napoleon  Henry County  Taxiway  Stubs  Partial Parallel 

   Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Norwalk  Norwalk‐Huron County  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

      Visual Approach Aids  None  PAPI 

Piqua  Piqua‐Hartzell Field  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

   Visual Approach Aids  None  PAPI 

Steubenville Jefferson County Airpark  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

Van Wert  Van Wert County  No projects to meet objectives 

Versailles  Darke County        No projects to meet objectives 

Wadsworth  Wadsworth Municipal  Weather Reporting  Wind Indicator  Automated Weather Reporting 

   Visual Approach Aids  V2R/V2L  PAPI 

Waverly  Pike County        No projects to meet objectives 

Wilmington  Clinton Field        No projects to meet objectives 

Level 4 Airports             Caldwell  Noble County        No projects to meet objectives 

Dayton  Moraine Air Park        No projects to meet objectives 

Deshler Deshler Municipal Landing Strip  Runway Lighting  None  LIRL 

   Airport Beacon  None  Yes 

   Taxiway  None  Turn‐around 

East Liverpool  Columbiana County        No projects to meet objectives 

Georgetown  Brown County  No projects to meet objectives 

Kelleys Island Kelleys Island Municipal Airport  Airport Beacon  None  Yes 

McConnelsville  Morgan County  No projects to meet objectives 

Middle Bass Middle Bass Island Airport  Runway Lighting  None  LIRL 

      Airport Beacon  None  Yes 

Mount Gilead  Morrow County  No projects to meet objectives 

New Lexington  Perry County        No projects to meet objectives 

North Bass Island  North Bass Island  Runway Lighting  None  LIRL 

   Airport Beacon  None  Yes 

Put‐In‐Bay  Put In Bay  Runway Lighting  None  LIRL 

Upper Sandusky  Wyandot County  No projects to meet objectives 

Washington Court House  Fayette County        No projects to meet objectives 

West Union  Alexander Salamon  No projects to meet objectives 

Willard  Willard  Airport Beacon  None  Yes 

Woodsfield  Monroe County        No projects to meet objectives 

Source: CDM Smith

Page 62: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐62

AsshowninTable8‐13,thereare36airportswithinthesystemthatmeetrecommendedfacilityandserviceobjectives.TheseairportsareillustratedinExhibit8‐1.Theremainingairportshaverecommendationsthatrangefromonlyoneprojecttoupwardsofeightprojectstomeetstatedfacilityandserviceobjectives.Exhibit8‐2mapsthesesystemairportsandtheirrangeofrecommendedprojects.

Page 63: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐63

Exhibit8‐1SystemAirportsMeetingPerformanceBenchmarks

Page 64: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐64

Exhibit8‐2RangeofRecommendationsatSystemAirports

Page 65: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐65

Thefollowingsectionbreaksdownthenumberandtypeofprojectsrecommendedtomeetfacilityobjectivesbyairportrole.TheARCcategoryrecommendationisexcludedfromthistallytoeliminateredundancysinceitemswithinitoverlapwithotherperformancebenchmarkrecommendations.Forthisexercise,itwillbeassumedthatairportswithrecommendedARCupgradeswillremainattheircurrentARCandonlytheprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarkswillbeincluded.

Level 1 Airports FiveLevel1airportsdonothaverecommendedprojectstomeetfacilityobjectives.Theremaining28Level1airportshaveatotalof99projectsrecommendedtomeettheirobjectives,rangingbetweenoneandsevenprojectsperairport.AsshowninExhibit8‐3,themostrecommendedprojectforLevel1airportsrelatestotheApproachLightingSystem(ALS)categoryandupgradingtoMALSRcapabilities,whichisrecommendedfor25airports.TheRunwayLighting,Fencing,andTaxiwaycategoriesfollowwith21,19,and11recommendations,respectively.TheleastcommonrecommendationforLevel1airportsisFuelasthereisonlyoneairportthatdoesn’tmeetthiscategoryobjective.

Exhibit8‐3ShareofRecommendationsbyObjectiveItem–Level1Airports

Source: CDM Smith 

Approach Lighting System (ALS)

24%

Fencing19%

Fuel1%

Instrument Approach

7%

No projects to meet objectives

5%

Runway Length8%

Runway Lighting21%

Taxiway10%

Weather Reporting5%

Page 66: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐66

Level 2 Airports SevenLevel2airportsdonothaveanyrecommendedprojectstomeetfacilityobjectives.Theremaining11Level2airportshaveatotalof21projectsrecommendedtomeettheirobjectives,rangingbetweenoneandfourprojectsperairport.AsshowninExhibit8‐4,themostcommonrecommendationsrelatetotheTaxiwayandInstrumentApproachcategories,whichareeachrecommendedforsixLevel2airports.RunwayLengthisthenextmostrecommendedproject,withfourairportshavingrecommendedextensionstomeettheirroleobjectives.Theleastrecommended,orbest‐met,objectivesareFencingandRunwayLighting,asonlytwoairportsdon’tmeetoneofthesecategoryobjectives.

Exhibit8‐4ShareofRecommendationsbyObjectiveItem–Level2Airports

Source: CDM Smith

Fencing4%

Instrument Approach

22%

No projects to meet objectives

25%Runway Length14%

Taxiway21%

Visual Approach Aids7%

Weather Reporting7%

Page 67: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐67

Level 3 Airports SevenLevel3airportsdonothaverecommendedprojectstomeetfacilityobjectives.Theremaining22Level3airportshaveatotalof49projectstomeettheirobjectives,rangingbetweenoneandsixprojectsperairport.AsshowninExhibit8‐5,themostcommonrecommendationrelatestoWeatherReporting,as18airportsarerecommendedtoinstallAutomatedWeatherReporting.TheVisualApproachAidsandTaxiwaycategoriesarethenextmostrecommendedprojects,astenandeightairportshaveupgradesrecommendedtomeettheirroleobjectives.TheleastcommonrecommendationforLevel3airportsisRunwayLighting,asonlyoneairportdoesn’tmeetthiscategoryobjective.

Exhibit8‐5ShareofRecommendationsbyObjectiveItem–Level3Airports

Source: CDM Smith 

Instrument Approach

5%

No projects to meet objectives

12%

Runway Length4%

Runway Lighting2%Snow Removal

9%

Taxiway14%

Terminal Building4%

Visual Approach Aids18%

Weather Reporting32%

Page 68: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐68

Level 4 Airports Ofthe17Level4airports,11donothaverecommendedprojectstomeetfacilityobjectives.ThisreflectsthelimitedrequirementsforLevel4airportsastheobjectivesforthisroleprovideforonlythebasicnecessitiestobeasystemairport,towhichmostairportscomply.ThesixremainingLevel4airportsrequireatotalof10projectstomeettheirobjectives,rangingbetweenoneandthreeprojectsperairport.AsshowninExhibit8‐6,themostcommonrecommendationisanAirportBeacon,whichisrecommendedforfiveairports.TheothertworecommendationsinvolvetheRunwayLightingandTaxiwaycategories,whicharerecommendedforfourandoneairports,respectively.

Exhibit8‐6ShareofRecommendationsbyObjectiveItem–Level4Airports

Source: CDM Smith 

Airport Beacon23%

No projects to meet objectives

50%

Runway Lighting18%

Taxiway9%

Page 69: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐69

System Wide Seventeenpercent(36airports)ofallairportsfullymeetthefacilityandserviceobjectivesoftheirrole.ThemostcommonrecommendationforallrolesinvolvesRunwayLightingimprovements,asthisprojectisrecommendedfor27airports.AsshowninExhibit8‐7,othercommonrecommendationsincludeTaxiwaychanges(26),WeatherReporting(25airports),ApproachLightingSystem(25airports),Fencing(21airports),andInstrumentApproach(16airports).TheleastcommonrecommendationisFuel,asonlyoneairport(WilmingtonAirPark)doesnotmeetitsobjectiveforthatparticularcategory.Forsomesystemairports,therecommendedfacilitiesmaybeunrealisticduetositelimitations,environmentalconstraints,communityopposition,and/orlackoffunding.Eachairportshouldbeindividuallystudiedtodeterminethepurposeandneed,feasibility,fundingandimpactassociatedwithrecommendedsystemplanimprovements.Again,itisuptoeachairportsponsortodevelopaCIPand/ormasterplantoguideandphasedevelopment.

Exhibit8‐7ShareofRecommendationsbyObjectiveItem–EntireSystem

Source: CDM Smith 

Airport Beacon2%

Approach Lighting System (ALS)

12% Fencing10%

Fuel0%

Instrument Approach

7%

No projects to meet objectives

17%Runway Length6%

Runway Lighting13%Snow 

Removal2%

Taxiway12%

Terminal Building

1%

Visual Approach Aids6%

Weather Reporting12%

Page 70: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐70

Airports with Recommended ARC Upgrades AirportReferenceCode(ARC)standardstranslatetothemaximumsizeaircraftanairportiscapableofaccommodatingintermsofoperationalandphysicalcharacteristics.Consequently,upgradestoARCstandardstypicallyinvolvemodificationstorunwaylength,runwaywidth,taxiwaylength,taxiwaywidth,RSAs,andrunway‐to‐taxiwayseparation.Thesephysicalcharacteristicsalldictatethemaximumaircraftsizeintermsofwingspanandapproachspeedthatanairportcanaccommodateonaregularbasis.Otherfactorssuchasnavigationalaids,visualaids,lighting,andweatherobservationcanalsoinfluenceanairport’sARCintermsofapproachvisibilityminimums.

Manyoftheaforementioneditemsthatinfluenceanairport’sARCdesignationarealsofactorsthatinfluenceanairport’sroleinthestatewidesystem.Sinceseveraloftheseitemsoverlap,itisnecessarytolookatrecommendedprojectstomeetupgradedARCstandardsandrecommendedprojectstomeetperformancebenchmarksseparately,notcumulatively.Systemwide,thereare17airportsthatarerecommendedtoupgradetheirfacilitiestomeethigherARCstandards.TheseairportsandtheirestimatedcoststoupgradetorecommendedARCstandardsarelistedinTable8‐14.

Table8‐14RecommendedARCUpgradesandAssociatedCosts

Associated City  Airport Current ARC  Recommended Project  Project Cost Estimate 

Level 1 Airports             Bluffton  Bluffton  B‐I  C‐II Standards  $19,538,000 

Bowling Green  Wood County  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $15,041,000 

Coshocton  Richard Downing  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $13,601,000 

Dayton  Dayton‐Wright Brothers  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $3,272,000 

Defiance  Defiance Memorial  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $14,532,000 

Lebanon  Warren County/John Lane Field  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $37,152,000 

Marion  Marion Municipal  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $4,363,000 

Marysville  Union County  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $16,355,000 

Middletown  Middletown Regional/Hook Field  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $4,623,000 

Ottawa  Putnam County  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $24,293,000 

Portsmouth  Greater Portsmouth Regional  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $6,821,000 

Sidney  Sidney Municipal  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $13,745,000 

Tiffin  Seneca County  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $27,790,000 

Willoughby  Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $10,906,000 

Wooster  Wayne County  B‐II  C‐II Standards  $15,762,000 

Level 2 Airports             Oxford  Miami University  B‐I Small  B‐II Standards  $5,488,000 

Wauseon  Fulton County  B‐I  B‐II Standards  $6,143,000 

Source: CDM Smith 

Cost Estimates of System Recommendations Inordertogainanappreciationforthescaleofinvestmentrequiredtocompletetherecommendedprojects,totalcostsmustbeestimated.

MethodologyThissectionidentifiesanddescribesthemethodologyutilizedtodeterminecostestimatesfortherecommended development projects. The recommended projects include 17 individual types ofprojectsranging frominfrastructure tonavigationalaids(NAVAID).Therecommended individualprojectsconsistofthefollowing:

Page 71: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐71

PrimaryRunwayExtension(3,200ft./4,000ft./5,000ft.) HighIntensityRunwayLighting(HIRL) MediumIntensityRunwayLighting(MIRL) LowIntensityRunwayLighting(LIRL) FullParallelTaxiway PartialParallelTaxiway TaxiwayTurnaround FullPerimeterAirfieldFencing AirportBeacon VisualApproachAids(PAPI) ApproachLightingSystem(MALSR) SnowRemoval TerminalBuilding ApproachProcedurewithVerticalGuidance(APV) Non‐PrecisionInstrumentApproach(NPA) Jet‐Aand/or100LLFuelFarm WeatherReporting(AWOS/ASOS)

Additionally,therecommendationsidentified17airportswhosesystemcategorycouldallowforanupgradetotheirAirportReferenceCode(ARC).TheARCisaFAAcodingsystemthatrelatesairportdesignstandardstotheoperationalandphysicalcharacteristicsofanairport’sdesignaircraft.TheletterportionoftheARCrepresentstheapproachspeedofanaircraft,whiletheRomannumeralrepresentsthewingspan.Ingeneral,theapproachcategoryappliestolengthrelatedstandards,whilethedesigngrouprelatestothewidthrelatedstandards.TherecommendedprojectsincludethefollowingtypesofARCchanges:

B‐ISmalltoB‐II B‐ItoB‐II B‐ItoC‐II B‐IItoC‐II

AnincreaseinARChasimplicationsonanumberairportdesigncriteria.Dependingonanairport’sparticularconfiguration,thischangeindesigncriteriamayresultinanumberofadditionalprojectsinordertomeetFAAstandards.Typically,achangeinARCimpactsRSAs,taxiwaysetbacks,andotherfactorsthatcanripplethroughanairportandimpactvariousexistingstructures.

TheanalysisdevelopedcostestimatesforboththeindividualprojectsandtheARCchangeprojects.CostestimatesfortheARCchangeprojectsassumedthattherecommendedindividualprojectswouldaccompanyanyassociatedARCchangeproject.Therefore,theARCchangecostestimatesincludedthecostfortheindividualrecommendedprojects.Allcostestimatesutilizedaunitcostmethodology,whichrepresentsboththefixedandvariablecostsincurredinarecommendedproject.ToaccountforthevarietyandindividualityofairportsinthestateofOhio,theanalysisgroupedtherecommendedprojectsintothreecategories.Thesecategories,describedinthesectionsbelow,definecertainassumptionsfortheapplicablerecommendedprojects.Thethreecategoriesare:

BasicUnitCostEstimates Low,Medium,HighImpactEstimates ARCChangeEstimates

Page 72: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐72

Thefinalcostestimatesincludedtwoadjustmentfactorstotheunitcostestimatetoarriveatthefinalcostestimate.ThefirstfactorisanARCadjustmentfactor.TheARCadjustmentfactorincreasedthecostestimatebyapercentagebasedontheairport’scurrentARC.Thisadjustmentassumesthat,asanairportincreasesinARC,thedevelopmentbecomesmorecostly.Thisisduetoadditionalcostsatlargerairportsareoftenafunctionofinteractionwithexistinginfrastructureandoperationalimpactsandincreasedsafetyrequirements.Additionally,largerairportsaretypicallyinmetropolitanareasthathavehigherlaborandmaterialcosts.ApproachCategoryAairportsreceivedzeroadjustment,Bairportsreceiveda5percentincrease,Creceiveda10percentincrease,andDreceiveda15percentincrease.Thesecondadjustmentfactoristhecontingencyfactor.SimilartotheARCadjustmentfactor,thecontingencyfactorincreasedthecostestimatebyapercentage.Thecontingencyfactoraccountsforengineering,planning,permitting,andenvironmentalservices,aswellasanyunforeseenorunknownelementsthatmayincreaseaproject’sdevelopmentcost.However,thiscontingencyfactordoesnotaccountforadditionalcostsassociatedwithanynecessaryenvironmentalmitigation.

Allcostestimatesusecalendaryears2013‐2014dollarvalues.Thefinalcostestimatesareorder‐of‐magnitudeestimatesofpotentialcostonly.Theyservetoprovideanindicationforplanningpurposesonlyanddonotnecessarilyreflectthecompletecostsofconstruction.

BasicUnitCostEstimatesThebasicunitcostestimatesrepresenttherecommendedprojectswithlittleornosite‐specificcriteria.Besidestheadjustmentfactors,theanalysisassumedtheseprojectstohavethesamelevelofcostregardlessofairport.Thebasicunitcostestimatesincludethefollowingrecommendedprojectsasdescribedinthesectionsbelow:

AirportBeaconTheairportbeaconisavisualnavigationalaidthatassistspilotsinlocatingandidentifyinganairport.Theairportbeaconprojectsbeamsoflight180degreesapartatanangle2degreesabovethehorizon.Foracivilairport,thesebeamsarealternatingwhiteandgreenflashes.ThebasiccostestimateforanairportbeaconincludedthephysicalinfrastructureofastandardmediumintensityL‐801Abeacon,astandardstructuralsteeltower,electricalsupply,andinstallationcosts.Asmostbeaconsarelocatedonairportpropertyduetotheirsmallfootprint,thecostestimatesassumednolandacquisition.Furthermore,thecostestimatesassumedthatnonaturalormanmadeobstructionwouldinterferewiththelightbeamfromthebeacon.

VisualApproachAid(PAPI)APrecisionApproachPathIndicator(PAPI)isavisualapproachaidpositionedbesidetherunwaytoassistpilotsinmaintainingproperglideslopetotherunway.ThePAPIunitconsistsofaseriesofequallyspacedlightunitsthatprovidecolor‐codedindicationstoanapproachingaircraft.ThebasiccostestimateforaPAPIsystemincludedastandardL‐8804‐lightPAPIaimedatstandardglideslopeof3degrees,associatedinfrastructure,sitepreparation,andelectricalwork.Theestimateassumedthattheairporthassufficientproperty/areaontheleftorrightsideoftheprimaryrunwayfortherequired50‐footlateraldistancefromtherunwayedge.

RunwayLighting(HIRL,MIRL,LIRL)Runwayedgelightingsystemsdefinetheedgeoftherunwaytoprovideavisualindicationtopilotsduringnightand/orlowvisibility.TheFAAhasthreestandardrunwayedgelightingsystems:HighIntensityRunwayLights(HIRL);MediumIntensityRunwayLights(MIRL);andLowIntensityRunwayLights(LIRL).FAAstandardsrequireairportswithprecisioninstrumentrunwaystohaveHIRL.TheFAArequiresMIRLonvisualornon‐precisioninstrumentrunways,andLIRLonvisualrunwaysatsmallairports.ForHIRLandMIRL,edgelightsemitwhitelightexceptinthelast2,000

Page 73: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐73

feetofarunwayend.AsthecostofmaterialandlevelofeffortissimilarfortheinstallationofHIRL,MIRL,andLIRLduetoFAAandpracticalrequirements,theanalysisdevelopedasingleunitcostestimatereflectingfullmaterialsandinstallation.Thisestimateincludedstandard200footlightspacingwith90percentelevatedlights,buriedconduitandequipment,andtemporaryelectricalconnectioncontingency.

SnowRemovalSnowremovalatOhioairportsisnecessarytoprovidesafeandcontinuedairportoperationsduringperiodsofinclementweather.Thetype,size,andspecificationofequipmentandfacilitiesatanairportdependonexistingequipment,personnel,infrastructure,anddeicingtechniqueandcompounds.Theonlytwoairportsrecommendedforsnowremoval(VintonCountyandGeaugaCounty)arebothsmallgeneralaviationairports.Therefore,thecostestimateassumedacquisitionofonepieceofheavy‐dutysnowremovalequipmentsuchasadisplacementplow,rotaryblower,melter,sweeper,orcombinationmulti‐functionequipment(MFE).Asthecostofthisequipmentcanvarygreatlyduetotype,age,andcondition,theestimateincludedasetcostof$100,000.Thesnowremovalestimatealsoincludedadedicatedheatedbuildingtoprolongusefullifeofequipmentandenablemorerapidresponse.Thecostestimatespricedallfixedandvariablecostsassociatedwitha30’x30’building.

TerminalBuildingBothGeaugaCountyandCarrollCounty‐Tolsonairportshaverecommendedprojectsfortheconstructionofaterminalbuilding.Ageneralaviationterminalvariesinsizeandfunctionthancommercialserviceairportterminals.TypicalgeneralaviationterminalscontainfunctionalareasthatincludeFBOspace,flightplanningareas,conferencerooms,administrationoffices,businesscenter,restrooms,andmaintenancesupportareas,amongothers.

Jet‐Aand/or100LLFuelFarmAirportfuelfarmsarefacilitiesforthestorageand/ordistributionofaircraftfuels.AirportstypicallydistributeeitherJet‐Aor100LL.Jet‐Aisakerosenetypefueldesignedforuseingasturbineengines.AvGas,alsoknownas100LL,isa100octanelowleadedfueltypicallyusedinpistondrivenaircraft.Typically,atairports,largecylindricalAbovegroundStorageTanks(AST)areusedforthestorageofaircraftfuels.Thebasiccostestimateassumedtheairporthassufficientareaandlocationfortheconstructionofasingletankwithstoragecapacityof10,000gallons.ThetotalestimateconsistedoftheAST,self‐serveequipment,plumbing,containment,andsecurity.

WeatherReporting(AWOS/ASOS)AnAutomatedSurfaceObservingSystem(ASOS)orAutomatedWeatherObservingSystem(AWOS)isamodularsetofmeteorologicalsensorsthatcollectlocalairportweatherdata.TheASOS/AWOScollectslocalweatherdataincludingwindspeed,winddirection,temperature,dewpoint,barometricpressure,densityaltitude,visibility,precipitation,day/night,cloudheight,skycondition,icing,andlightning.ThecostestimateassumedthefixedandvariablecostsofatypicalAWOS/ASOSinstallationincludingsensors,sitepreparation,electricalwork,andcommissioning.ThecostestimatesalsoassumedthatanairporthasasufficientlocationandareaforthepropersitingofanAWOS/ASOSinaccordancewithFAAstandards,andthereforenolandacquisitionwasincluded.

Low,Medium,HighImpactEstimatesAsdescribedabove,thecostanalysismadecertainassumptionsfortheprojectsgroupedinthebasicunitcostestimatecategory.However,manyoftherecommendedprojectshavenoticeablyvariablecostsdependingonspecificsiteconditions.Theseconditionsincludeadditionalsitepreparationduetolocalterrain,specificairportfeatures,ormorecomplexequipment

Page 74: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐74

configuration/design.Toaccountforthesefactorsandprovidearealisticestimatefortherecommendedprojects,theanalysisgroupedtherelativeimpactoftheirconstructionataneachairportintolow,medium,andhighimpactcategories.Whatconstituteslow,medium,andhighimpactdependsontherecommendedproject,asdescribedinthesectionsbelow.Whereapplicable,thelow,medium,andhighestimatesincludedthecosttobringanairportuptostandardsattheexistingARCforthatparticularprojectonly.

FullPerimeterAirfieldFencingTheFAAandTSArequireairfieldperimeterfencingforairportscertificatedunderPart139,andstronglyencouragegeneralaviationairportstohaveairfieldperimeterfencing.Theperimeterfencecanconsistofanumberofvariouselementsincludingthechainlink,pedestriangates,vehiclegates,andmaintenancegates.Therelativeimpactofcostdependsprimarilyonthelocalterrainandclearing/grubbing.Forfencing,theanalysisquantifiedlowandhighcostestimatesonly.Theunitpriceforalowimpactconsideredtheaveragecostforthefenceandonegateevery500‐1000feet.Theunitpriceforahighimpactconsideredtheaveragecostforthefence,clearingandgrubbing,andonegateevery500‐1000feet.Theclearingandgrubbingassumeda40feetclearedareaforfenceleaving20feetoneachsideformaintenanceandsecuritychecks.

ApproachLightingSystem(MALSR)Approachlightingsystemsarevisualnavigationalaidsthatassistpilotsapproachingtheairportinacquiringtherunwayandeasingthetransitionfrominstrumentflighttovisualflightforlanding.TheMediumIntensityALSwithRunwayAlignment(MALSR)isasetofsymmetricallyplacedlightsextending2,400feetontheextendedrunwaycenterline.Thecostestimateanalysisdevelopedlow,medium,andhighunitcostsfortheMALSRsystemthatencompassedequipment,installation,andotherconstructioncosts.Lowimpactappliedtoairportsthatwouldhavelimitedsitepreparation,andrequirenolandacquisitioninordertoconstructtheMALSR.Mediumimpactappliedtoairportswithvaryingairportterrainnecessitatingstructuralmastsforlightstations.Highimpactappliedtoairportsneedingtoacquireeasements,clearing/grubbingandrelocateshortroadsections.

PrimaryRunwayExtension(3,200’,4,000’,5,000’)Therecommendeddevelopmentsincludeextendingtherunwaysat14Ohioairportsto3,200,4,000,or5,000feetintotallength.Duetothevaryinglengthoftheexistingrunways,thecostestimatedevelopedaunitcostthatencompassedallfixedandvariablecostsperlinearfootofrunwayextension.Theanalysisquantifiedlow,medium,andhighimpactunitcostforthreestandardrunwaywidths:60feet,75feet,and100feet.Allthreeimpactestimatesconsideredthesameunitcostsforrunwaypavementmaterials,pavementmarking,lighting,andsignage.Lowimpactunitcostsconsideredminimalcut,fill,andrestorationrequirements,whilemediumandhighincreasedthesecostsaccordingly.Mediumandhighestimatesincludedcostsforclearingandgrubbinganddrainingimprovements.Additionally,highimpactcostsincludedanallowanceforlandacquisitionduetoRSA/ROFAandrelocationofroadsoutsideofairportproperty.

TaxiwayExtension(Full/PartialParallel,Turnaround)Thetaxiwayextensionprojectsrecommendedconsistofthreeforms:afullparalleltaxiway,partialparalleltaxiway,andtaxiwayturnaround.Similartotherunwaycostestimates,theanalysisdevelopedaunitcostperlinearfootoftaxiwayforlow,medium,andhighimpactsforstandard25’,35’,50’,and75’widths.Alsosimilartorunwayextensions,thecostoftaxiwaypavementmaterials,pavementmarking,lighting,andsignagewaskeptconstantforallthreeimpactcategories.Mediumimpactcategoriesincreasedcostforclearingandgrubbing,drainageimprovements,andeasementacquisition,whileHighimpactcategoriesincreasedcostforclearingandgrubbing,landacquisition,andbuildingdemolition.Nofilletdesignorcostwasincludedintaxiwaycostestimates.Full‐length

Page 75: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐75

paralleltaxiwaysincludedthelengthtocompletethetaxiwaytobeparallelwiththefulllengthoftheprimaryrunway.Duetomultiplepotentialconfigurations,partialparalleltaxiwaysrepresent50percentofthefullprimaryrunwaylength.ThelengthofpavementrequiredfortaxiwayturnaroundswasdeterminedperFAAdesignsandstandardsforsmalltaxiwayturnarounds.

ApproachProcedures(APVorNPA)Twotypesofapproachprocedureswererecommendedfortheprimaryrunwayat17Ohioairports:ApproachProcedurewithVerticalGuidance(APV)andNon‐PrecisionApproach(NPA).PrimaryrunwaysclassifiedasAPVprovideelectronicnavigationguidanceforapproachingaircraft,includingbothlateralandverticalguidance.Non‐precisionapproachesaccommodatelateralguidanceonly.WhiletherearemultipleapproachtypesthatcanbeclassifiedaseitherAPVorNPI,manyofthemdonotrequirephysicalelectronicinfrastructureatanairport.Theyareprimarilyafunctionofaircraftandsatellitebasednavigationequipment.Therefore,theprimarycostsassociatedwithanAPVorNPAaretheadministrationandflightcheckcostsforprocedureestablishment.However,FAAstandardsrequireairportswithAPVorNPAtocomplywithcertaindesignstandardsinordertohavetheapproach.Theseitemsincluderunwaylength,width,marking,andlighting.WhilethecostfortheAPVorNPIapproachitselfdoesnothaveahigh,medium,orlowimpactcost,theassociatedprojectsrequiredtobringtheairportuptostandarddo.Costestimatesfortheassociatedprojectsfollowthemethodologydescribedinthischapter.

ARCChangeEstimatesTheARCchangeestimatesarethemostcomplexcostestimatesfortherecommendedprojectsduetotheairportspecificassociatedprojectsrequiredtocomplywithFAAstandards.ForcertainARCchanges,anincreaseinARCincreasessomeairfielddesignstandards.Theairfieldstandardsmayrequireincreasesinlength,width,orareaandincludesamongothers:

RunwayWidth RunwaySafetyArea RunwayObjectFreeArea RunwayCenterlinetoAircraftparkingarea RunwayCenterlinetoTaxiwayCenterline TaxiwayWidth TaxiwaySafetyArea TaxiwayObjectFreeArea

Toaccountforthesechangesinstandards,anairfieldfacilityanalysisexaminedeachofthe17airportsrecommendedforARCchange.Dependingonthespecificairport,theprojectsassociatedwiththeARCchangevarysubstantially.Thecurrentconfigurationandgeometryoftheairfieldsystem,aswellasavailabilityofairportproperty,interactionswithexistingstructures,anddevelopmentinproximityoftheairportallhaveanimpactonrequiredprojects.

Forcostestimationpurposes,theanalysisconsideredonlyonelayoutoftherecommendedandassociatedprojectsataparticularairport.Thislayoutconsideredtheidealconfigurationoftheairfieldfacilitiesonly.Therearelikelytobeanumberofphysicalandoperationalalternativesthatmaysatisfytheairport’sneed.However,theanalysisdidnotevaluatemultiplealternatives.

Forpracticability,theARCchangecostestimatesnecessitatedseveralassumptions.Aspreviouslymentioned,theanalysisassumesthat,givenanARCupgrade,allindividualrecommendedprojectswilloccur.Forinstance,ifanairport’sperformancebenchmarkrecommendationsincludeaMALSR,thetotalARCchangecostestimatealsoincludesthecostsassociatedwithaMALSR.Theprimary

Page 76: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐76

differenceisthattheperformancebenchmarkrecommendationconsiderstheARCadjustmentfortheexistingARC,whiletheARCprojectconsiderstheproposedARCadjustment.

Additionalassumptionsincludenochangestoanairport’sapproachvisibilityminimumsorairspaceimaginarysurfaces.InadditiontotheARCapproachanddesigncategories,thevisibilityminimumsforarunwayassistindefiningtheapplicableairfielddesignstandards.ThecostestimationassumesthattheairportwillmaintainitsexistingminimumsifitincreasesinARC.ThecostestimationanalysisalsoassumesthatallairportswouldmaintainorestablishanNPAorAPVprocedure(ifnotrecommended).Thisassumptionimpliesthattheairport’sPart77surfacedimensionsandassociatedBuildingRestrictionLine(BRL)wouldremainthesame.Thecostestimationdidnotincludeananalysisofobstructionstopart77surfaces,theFAAapproach/departuresurfaces,norownershipofproposedRunwayProtectionZones(RPZ).Therefore,thecostofmitigatingorremovingobstructionswasnotincluded.

Cost Estimates of Recommended Projects Usingtheseestimatedunitcosts,approximatecostsforeachfacility/serviceitemateachairportwerecalculated.Notethatseveralairports(17)arerecommendedtoupgradetheirAirportReferenceCode(ARC).SincemanyoftherecommendedprojectslistedtomeetperformancebenchmarksoverlapwiththefacilityimprovementsfoundwithintherecommendedARCupgrades,thetwoaredistinguishedfromeachother.Fortheseairportsascenario‐basedanalysiswithtwopossiblescenariosisused:

Scenario 1 – represents the full ARC upgrade plus any other projects recommended tomeetperformancebenchmarks

Scenario 2 – represents only the projects recommended to meet performance benchmarkswhilemaintainingtheairport’scurrentARC

Sincethetwoscenarioscontainoverlappingitems,thecostestimateforthetwoscenariosshouldbeconsideredindependentofeachotherandshouldnotbeaggregated.TherecommendationsummarytablesinAppendixDpresenttheestimatedcostsoftherecommendedprojectsforeachairportand,whereapplicable,distinguishesbetweencostsofScenario1andScenario2.

Itisimportanttokeepinmindthatanyrecommendedimprovementsarebasedonahighlevelanalysisofthesystemandstillneedtobevettedandsupportedbylocalplanningeffortsbyeachindividualairport.ItshouldnotbeinferredthattheprojectsincludedinthisdocumentmeetFAAjustificationcriteriaorthattheyareendorsedbytheFAAorODOT.Rather,thisdocumentservesasoneofmanyfactorsweighedbytheFAAandODOTintheoverallassessmentofOhioairportprojectfunding.

Atmanyairports,afullARCupgradeisnotpracticalduetophysicalconstraintssuchasavailableland,roadways,andothernearbystructures.Scenario2isintendedtobeamorepragmaticapproachbyonlymakingrecommendationstomeetsystemperformancebenchmarks,regardlessofARCobjective.However,severalperformancebenchmarkobjectiveitemscannotberecommendedforcertainairportsgiventheircurrentARC.Therefore,projects(andtheirassociatedcosts)thatarenotARCappropriatewillbeomittedfromScenario2.

Forexample,BlufftoniscurrentlyaLevel1airportwithanARCofB‐I.PerformancebenchmarksrecommendthatallLevel1airportshaveaC‐IIARC.Scenario1estimatesthecosttomeetallLevel1performancebenchmarks,includinganARCupgradefromB‐ItoC‐II.Scenario2estimatesthecoststomeetallLevel1performancebenchmarkswhileremainingatARCB‐I.TheperformancebenchmarksforaLevel1includeseveralitemsthatareonlyappropriateforairportswithanARC

Page 77: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐77

ofC‐II,suchasMALSRinstallation.SoundplanningwouldnotcallforaMALSRtobeinstalledataB‐IairportsuchasBluffton.Similarly,Scenario2performancebenchmarksforaLevel1airportcallforaprimaryrunwayof5,000feet.Ifanairport’scurrentprimaryrunwaywidthislessthan100feet,itwouldnotbeappropriatetorecommendarunwayextensionto5,000feetatitscurrentsub‐100footwidth.Inthesecases,suchprojectswillberemovedfromScenario2.

AsshowninAppendixD,thereare35airportswithinthesystemthatmeetrecommendedperformancebenchmarksandthereforehavenoassociatedcosts.Theremainingairportshaverecommendationsforprojectswithindividualcostsrangingfromabout$60,000toover$12million.Thefollowingsectionsummarizestheestimatedcostsassociatedwithprojectsrecommendedtomeetfacilityobjectivesbyairportrole.

Fortherolesinwhichitapplies,thecostsaredividedintothetwoscenariosaspreviouslymentioned(Scenario1andScenario2).Scenario1representsthecostforfullARCupgradeplusanyotherprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarks,whereasScenario2representsonlytheprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarkswhilemaintainingcurrentARCs.

Sinceonly17airportshaverecommendedARCchanges,onlytheroleswithinwhichthese17airportsfallwillbedividedintoseparateScenarios.Thismeansthatsincethereare15Level1airportsandtwoLevel2airportswithrecommendedARCchanges,onlythosetwolevelsplusasystemwidetotalwillhavetwoscenarios.TheAirCarrier,Level3,andLevel4airportswillhaveonlyonescenario.

 

Page 78: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐78

Level 1 Airports TherearefiveLevel1airportsthatfullymeetallperformancebenchmarksandthereforedonothaveanyrecommendedprojectsorassociatedcosts.Since15Level1airportshaverecommendedARCchanges,Level1costsarebrokenoutintoScenario1andScenario2.Scenario1(Exhibit8‐10)representsthecostforfullARCupgradeplusanyotherprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarks,whereasScenario2(Exhibit8‐11)representsonlytheprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarkswhilemaintainingcurrentARCs.InScenario1,the28remainingLevel1airportscombineforatotalof159recommendedprojectswithanestimatedcostofnearly$257milliontomeettheirobjectives.AsshowninExhibit8‐8,thelargestcostsareassociatedwithRunwayChangesandTaxiwayChanges,with39and27percentofthetotalrecommendedprojectcosts.TomeettheirrecommendedARCupgrade,manyairportswouldrequiremajorreconfigurationstomeetARCstandardsforitemssuchasrunway‐to‐taxiwayseparation,taxiwaywidth,orobjectfreeareas(OFA).ApproachLightingSystemandRSAImprovementsfollowwith14and10percent,respectively.AllotherprojecttypescompriselessthanfivepercentofthetotalcostsforLevel1airportsinScenario1.

Exhibit8‐8ShareofEstimatedCostbyObjectiveItem–Level1Airports

Scenario1:FullARCUpgrade&OtherBenchmarkRecommendations

 Source: CDM Smith 

Approach Lighting System (ALS)

14%

Fencing5%

Fuel0%

Instrument Approach

1%RSA Improvements10%

Runway Changes39%

Runway Lighting3%

Taxiway Changes27%

Taxiway Lighting1%

Visual Approach Aids0%

Weather Reporting0%

Page 79: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐79

Scenario2estimatesatotalcostofnearly$129millionforallprojectsrecommendedtomeetLevel1performancebenchmarkswhilemaintainingcurrentARCs.AsshowninExhibit8‐9,byfarthelargestcostisassociatedwithTaxiwayenhancementsat37percentofallcostsforLevel1airports.ThisisdespitethefactthatTaxiwaysonlyaccountfor10percentofallLevel1recommendations.ApproachLightingSystemandRunwayLengthfollowat26and17percentoftotalcost.ThelargeshareforTaxiwaysisreflectiveofthesignificantresourcesinvolvedinadjustingtaxiwayinfrastructure.

Exhibit8‐9ShareofEstimatedCostbyObjectiveItem–Level1Airports

Scenario2:RecommendedIndividualProjects(MaintainCurrentARC)

Source: CDM Smith 

 

Approach Lighting System (ALS)

26%

Fencing10%

Fuel0%

Instrument Approach1%

Runway Length17%

Runway Lighting8%

Snow Removal0%

Taxiway37%

Weather Reporting1%

Page 80: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐80

Level 2 Airports TherearesevenLevel2airportsthatdonothaverecommendedanyprojectstomeetfacilityobjectivesandthereforedonothaveanyrecommendedprojectsorassociatedcosts.TherearetwoLevel2airportswithrecommendedARCchangesandthereforeLevel2costsarebrokenoutintotwoscenarios.Scenario1(Exhibit8‐12)representsthecostforfullARCupgradeplusanyotherprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarks,whereasScenario2(Exhibit8‐13)representsonlytheprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarkswhilemaintainingcurrentARCs.InScenario1,theremaining11Level2airportshaveatotalof25recommendedprojectswithanestimatedcostofnearly$41milliontomeettheirobjectives.AsshowninExhibit8‐10,byfarthelargestcostsareassociatedwithTaxiwayChanges.Runwaychangesfollowwith13percent,andallotherprojectcategorieseachrepresentlessthanthreepercentofthetotalLevel2costsinScenario1.

Exhibit8‐10ShareofEstimatedCostbyObjectiveItem–Level2Airports

Scenario1:FullARCUpgrade&OtherBenchmarkRecommendations

 Source: CDM Smith 

Fencing2%

Instrument Approach1%

RSA Improvements2%

Runway Changes13%

Taxiway Changes80%

Taxiway Lighting0%

Visual Approach Aids1%

Weather Reporting

1%

Page 81: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐81

Scenario2estimatesacostofnearly$39millionforallprojectsrecommendedtomeetLevel2performancebenchmarkswhilemaintainingcurrentARCs.AsshowninExhibit8‐11,similartoScenario1thelargestcostisassociatedwithTaxiwayenhancements,with84percentofallcostsforLevel2airports.ThisisdespitethefactthatTaxiwayaccountsforonly21percentofallLevel2recommendations.AtadistantsecondisRunwayLengthwith11percentofallcosts.AllothercategorieseachmakeuplessthantwopercentofallLevel2costsinScenario2.

Exhibit8‐11ShareofEstimatedCostbyObjectiveItem–Level2Airports

Scenario2:RecommendedIndividualProjects(MaintainCurrentARC)

Source: CDM Smith 

 

Fencing2%

Instrument Approach1%

Runway Length11%

Taxiway84%

Visual Approach Aids1%

Weather Reporting1%

Page 82: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐82

Level 3 Airports SevenLevel3airportsfullymeetallperformancebenchmarksandthereforedonothaveanyrecommendedprojectsorassociatedcosts.Theremaining22Level3airportshaveatotalof49recommendedprojectswithanestimatedcostofnearly$36milliontomeettheirobjectives.Onceagain,byawidemarginTaxiwayimprovementsaccountforthemajority(52percent)ofallprojectcostsassociatedwithLevel3airports.ThisisincontrasttothefactthatTaxiwayimprovementsaccountforonly14percentofallLevel3recommendations.TerminalBuilding,RunwayLength,andWeatherReportingprojectcostsfollowat13,12,and11percent,respectively.AsshowninExhibit8‐12,theremainingprojectcategorieseachaccountfor5percentorless.SincenoLevel3airportshaverecommendedARCprojects,thefollowingchartisrepresentativeofbothScenario1and2.

Exhibit8‐12ShareofEstimatedCostbyObjectiveItem–Level3Airports

Scenarios1&2

Source: CDM Smith 

Instrument Approach

1%

Runway Length12%

Runway Lighting1%

Snow Removal5%

Taxiway52%

Terminal Building13%

Visual Approach Aids5%

Weather Reporting11%

Page 83: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐83

Level 4 Airports Ofthe17Level4airports,11donothaverecommendedprojectstomeetfacilityobjectivesandthereforedonothaveanyassociatedprojectcosts.ThisreflectsthelimitedgoalsforLevel4airportsastheobjectivesforthisroleprovidefortheonlythebasicnecessitiestobeasystemairport,towhichmostairportscomply.ThesixremainingLevel4airportshaveatotalof10projectswithanestimatedcostofover$1.5milliontomeettheirobjectives.RunwayLightingprojectsaccountforthelargestshare(58percent)ofcostsassociatedwithallLevel4recommendedprojects.AsshowninExhibit8‐13,TaxiwayandAirportBeacon,whichfollowat22and20percent,aretheonlyotherrecommendationsforLevel4airports.SincenoLevel4airportshaverecommendedARCprojects,thefollowingchartisrepresentativeofbothScenario1and2.

Exhibit8‐13ShareofEstimatedCostbyObjectiveItem–Level4Airports

Scenarios1&2

Source: CDM Smith 

Airport Beacon20%

Runway Lighting58%

Taxiway22%

Page 84: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐84

System Wide Systemwide,thereare36airportsthatmeettheirperformanceobjectivesandthereforedonothaveanyrecommendedprojectsorassociatedcosts.Since17systemairportshaverecommendedARCchanges,systemcostsareseparatedintoScenario1andScenario2.Scenario1(Exhibit8‐16)representsthecostforfullARCupgradeplusanyotherprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarks,whereasScenario2(Exhibit8‐17)representsonlytheprojectsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarkswhilemaintainingcurrentARCs.Theremaining68airportsaccountforatotalof246recommendedprojectswithanestimatedcostofnearly$335milliontomeettheirobjectives.AsshowninExhibit8‐14,Taxiwaychangesaccountforthelargestshareofallprojecttype‐costsat36percent.Runwaychangesfollowcloselybehindwith32percentofallrecommendedprojectcosts.ProjectsrelatedtoApproachLightingSystemsaccountfor11percentofallrecommendedcosts.Allotherprojectstypeseachrepresentlessthan8percentofthetotal.

Exhibit8‐14ShareofEstimatedCostbyObjectiveItem–EntireSystem

Scenario1:FullARCUpgrade&OtherBenchmarkRecommendations

 Source: CDM Smith 

Airport Beacon0%

Approach Lighting System (ALS)

11%

Fencing4%

Fuel0%

Instrument Approach

1%

RSA Improvements

8%

Runway Changes32%

Runway Lighting3%

Snow Removal0%

Taxiway Changes36%

Taxiway Lighting1%

Terminal Building1%

Visual Approach Aids1%

Weather Reporting2%

Page 85: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐85

At49percent,Taxiwayimprovementsaccountforthelargestshareofcostsassociatedwithrecommendedprojects.ProjectsrelatedtoApproachLightingSystem(ALS)andRunwayLengthfollow,accountingfor16and15percentofallestimatedcosts.AsshowninExhibit8‐15,theremainingprojectcategorieseachaccountfor6percentorlessofallestimatedcosts.Forsomesystemairports,therecommendedfacilitiesmaybeunrealisticduetositelimitations,environmentalconstraints,communityopposition,and/orlackoffunding.Eachairportshouldbeindividuallystudiedtodeterminethepurposeandneed,feasibility,fundingandimpactassociatedwithrecommendedsystemplanimprovements.Again,itisuptoeachairportsponsortodevelopaCIPand/ormasterplantoguideandphasedevelopment.

Exhibit8‐15ShareofEstimatedCostbyObjectiveItem–EntireSystem

Scenario2:RecommendedIndividualProjects(MaintainCurrentARC)

Source: CDM Smith 

Airport Beacon0%

Approach Lighting System (ALS)

16%Fencing6%

Fuel0%

Instrument Approach

1%

Runway Length15%

Runway Lighting6%Snow 

Removal1%

Taxiway49%

Terminal Building2%

Visual Approach Aids1%

Weather Reporting3%

Page 86: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐86

Systemwide,thereare14differentfacility/serviceitemsrecommendedtomeetperformancebenchmarks,includingallARCrelatedprojects(Scenario1).Table8‐15belowsummarizesbyrolethepercentageoftotalrecommendationsandpercentageoftotalestimatedcosteachprojecttype.

Table8‐15

ProjectTypesbyPercentofTotalCost

(Scenario1:FullARCUpgrade&OtherRecommendedProjects)

Objective Item  Percentage Air 

Carrier  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Level 4  System Total 

Airport Beacon % of Total Projects  50%  2% 

% of Total Cost  20%  0% 

Approach Lighting System (ALS) 

% of Total Projects  24%  16% 

% of Total Cost  14%  10% 

Fencing % of Total Projects  12%  4%  9% 

% of Total Cost  5%  2%  4% 

Fuel % of Total Projects  1%  0% 

% of Total Cost  0%  0% 

Instrument Approach % of Total Projects  8%  24%  6%  9% 

% of Total Cost  1%  1%  1%  1% 

RSA Improvements % of Total Projects  11%  8%  8% 

% of Total Cost  10%  2%  8% 

Runway Changes % of Total Projects  11%  20%  4%  10% 

% of Total Cost  39%  13%  12%  32% 

Runway Lighting % of Total Projects  11%  2%  40%  9% 

% of Total Cost  4%  1%  58%  3% 

Snow Removal % of Total Projects  10%  2% 

% of Total Cost  5%  0% 

Taxiway Changes % of Total Projects  14%  24%  16%  10%  15% 

% of Total Cost  27%  80%  52%  22%  36% 

Taxiway Lighting % of Total Projects  4%  4%  3% 

% of Total Cost  1%  0%  1% 

Terminal Building % of Total Projects  4%  1% 

% of Total Cost  13%  1% 

Visual Approach Aids % of Total Projects  100%  1%  8%  20%  6% 

% of Total Cost  100%  0%  0%  5%  1% 

Weather Reporting % of Total Projects  3%  8%  37%  10% 

% of Total Cost  1%  1%  11%  2% 

TOTAL Total Projects  1  161  25  49  10  246 

Total Costs  $208,000  $256,729,000  $40,712,000  $35,818,000  $1,520,000  $334,986,000 

Source: CDM Smith 

Page 87: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐87

Summary of Performance Benchmark Recommendations Systemwide,atotalof180projectsarerecommendedforairportstofullymeettheirperformancebenchmarkswhilemaintainingcurrentARCs.Theseperformancebenchmarkprojectshaveatotalestimatedcostofover$205million.Ifallsystemairportsweretocompleteallrecommendations,includingfullARCupgrades,totalestimatedcostswouldbeapproximately$335million.Notsurprisingly,Level1airportscomprisethemajorityofthesecostsduetothisrole’smorerobustfacilityandserviceobjectives.Table8‐16breaksdowntheestimatedcostsofrecommendedprojectsbyroleforbothScenario1and2.

Table8‐16

SummaryofPerformanceBenchmarksRecommendations

Scenario 1: Full ARC Upgrade Scenario 2: Maintain 

Current ARC 

Airport Role 

Estimated Cost for Airports with ARC 

Upgrades  + Estimated Cost for All Other Airports  = 

Full ARC Upgrade Total  Estimated Cost 

Air Carrier Airports  $0  +  $208,000  =  $208,000  $208,000 

Level 1 Airports  $227,561,000  +  $29,168,000  =  $256,729,000  $128,739,000 

Level 2 Airports  $11,631,000  +  $29,081,000  =  $40,712,000  $38,908,000 

Level 3 Airports  $0  +  $35,819,000  =  $35,819,000  $35,819,000 

Level 4 Airports  $0  +  $1,520,000  =  $1,520,000  $1,520,000 

SYSTEM TOTAL  $239,192,000  +  $95,796,000  =  $334,988,000  $205,194,000 

Source: CDM Smith 

Table8‐17providesasummaryofultimatecostestimatesforallrecommendationsbyairport.Asdiscussed,costsassociatedwithARCupgradesaredistinguishedfromcostsassociatedwithperformancebenchmarksduetooverlappingprojectitems.RecommendationsummarytableswerecreatedforeachairportintheOhiosystem,listingeachbenchmarkrecommendationandcost,andallrecommendedcomplianceprojects.ThesetablesarelocatedinAppendixD.

Table8‐17UltimateCostEstimatesofRecommendationsbyAirport

Associated City  Airport 

Scenario 1: Full ARC 

Upgrade Total 

Scenario 2: Recommended 

Individual Project Costs at Current 

ARC 

Air Carrier Airports          Akron  Akron‐Canton       

Cleveland  Cleveland‐Hopkins Int'l       

Columbus  Port Columbus International       

Columbus  Rickenbacker International       

Dayton  James M. Cox Dayton Int'l       

Toledo  Toledo Express     $208,000 

Youngstown/Warren  Youngstown‐Warren Regional       

Level 1 Airports          Akron  Akron Fulton International     $1,591,900 

Ashtabula  Northeast Ohio Regional     $2,940,800 

Bluffton  Bluffton  $19,538,000  $8,205,700 

Bowling Green  Wood County  $15,041,000  $7,035,300 

Chillicothe  Ross County     $2,870,500 

Cincinnati  Cincinnati Municipal‐Lunken Field       

Page 88: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐88

Table8‐17UltimateCostEstimatesofRecommendationsbyAirport

Associated City  Airport 

Scenario 1: Full ARC 

Upgrade Total 

Scenario 2: Recommended 

Individual Project Costs at Current 

ARC 

Cleveland  Burke Lakefront       

Cleveland  Cuyahoga County     $249,800 

Columbus  Bolton Field     $572,000 

Columbus  Ohio State University       

Coshocton  Richard Downing  $13,601,000  $2,826,400 

Dayton  Dayton‐Wright Brothers  $3,272,000  $1,775,000 

Defiance  Defiance Memorial  $14,532,000  $7,976,200 

Delaware  Delaware Municipal‐Jim Moore Field     $2,585,400 

Hamilton  Butler County Regional     $2,056,600 

Lebanon  Warren County/John Lane Field  $37,152,000  $10,579,800 

Lima  Lima Allen County     $2,226,300 

Lorain/Elyria  Lorain County Regional       

Mansfield  Mansfield Lahm Regional    

Marion  Marion Municipal  $4,363,000  $2,455,600 

Marysville  Union County  $16,355,000  $5,626,500 

Middletown  Middletown Regional/Hook Field  $4,623,000  $2,342,200 

Ottawa  Putnam County  $24,293,000  $12,445,400 

Portsmouth  Greater Portsmouth Regional  $6,821,000  $3,759,800 

Sidney  Sidney Municipal  $13,745,000  $8,314,000 

Springfield  Springfield‐Beckley Municipal     $1,484,600 

Tiffin  Seneca County  $27,790,000  $6,936,400 

Toledo  Toledo Executive     $6,744,400 

Wapakoneta  Neil Armstrong     $3,115,400 

Willoughby  Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal  $10,674,000  $9,452,200 

Wilmington  Wilmington Air Park     $270,000 

Wooster  Wayne County  $15,762,000  $9,844,600 

Zanesville  Zanesville Municipal     $2,456,400 

Level 2 Airports          Athens/Albany  Ohio University‐Snyder Field       

Bellefontaine  Bellefontaine Regional       

Bryan  Williams County     $8,590,700 

Circleville  Pickaway County Memorial     $337,600 

Findlay  Findlay       

Fostoria  Fostoria Metropolitan     $5,948,100 

Fremont  Sandusky County Regional       

Jackson  James A. Rhodes     $4,015,100 

Lancaster  Fairfield County       

Millersburg  Holmes County     $6,848,800 

Mount Vernon  Knox County     $697,100 

New Philadelphia  Harry Clever Field     $385,900 

Newark  Newark‐Heath     $62,500 

Oxford  Miami University  $5,488,000  $3,684,700 

Port Clinton  Carl R. Keller Field       

Ravenna  Portage County     $2,195,000 

Urbana  Grimes Field       

Page 89: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐89

Table8‐17UltimateCostEstimatesofRecommendationsbyAirport

Associated City  Airport 

Scenario 1: Full ARC 

Upgrade Total 

Scenario 2: Recommended 

Individual Project Costs at Current 

ARC 

Wauseon  Fulton County  $6,143,000  $6,142,700 

Level 3 Airports          Ashland  Ashland County     $231,300 

Barnesville  Barnesville‐Bradfield     $431,300 

Batavia  Clermont County       

Bucyrus  Port Bucyrus‐Crawford County     $322,500 

Cadiz  Harrison County     $231,300 

Cambridge  Cambridge Municipal     $2,947,700 

Carrollton  Carroll County‐Tolson     $2,481,300 

Celina  Lakefield     $231,300 

Chesapeake/Huntington, WV  Lawrence County Airpark     $4,252,500 

Dayton  Greene County‐Lewis A. Jackson Regional       

Galion  Galion Municipal     $231,300 

Gallipolis  Gallia‐Meigs Regional     $2,441,000 

Harrison  Cincinnati West     $5,248,600 

Hillsboro  Highland County       

Kent  Kent State University     $431,300 

Kenton  Hardin County     $4,149,800 

London  Madison County     $231,300 

McArthur  Vinton County     $2,521,600 

Medina  Medina Municipal     $231,300 

Middlefield  Geauga County     $5,463,600 

Napoleon  Henry County     $2,214,300 

Norwalk  Norwalk‐Huron County     $431,300 

Piqua  Piqua‐Hartzell Field     $431,300 

Steubenville  Jefferson County Airpark     $231,300 

Van Wert  Van Wert County       

Versailles  Darke County       

Wadsworth  Wadsworth Municipal     $431,300 

Waverly  Pike County       

Wilmington  Clinton Field       

Level 4 Airports          Caldwell  Noble County       

Dayton  Moraine Air Park       

Deshler  Deshler Municipal Landing Strip     $639,500 

East Liverpool  Columbiana County       

Georgetown  Brown County       

Kelleys Island  Kelleys Island Municipal     $60,000 

McConnelsville  Morgan County       

Middle Bass  Middle Bass Island Airport     $237,800 

Mount Gilead  Morrow County       

New Lexington  Perry County       

North Bass Island  North Bass Island     $233,200 

Put‐In‐Bay  Put In Bay     $287,000 

Upper Sandusky  Wyandot County       

Page 90: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐90

Table8‐17UltimateCostEstimatesofRecommendationsbyAirport

Associated City  Airport 

Scenario 1: Full ARC 

Upgrade Total 

Scenario 2: Recommended 

Individual Project Costs at Current 

ARC 

Washington Court House  Fayette County       

West Union  Alexander Salamon       

Willard  Willard     $281,300 

Woodsfield  Monroe County       

SYSTEM TOTAL     $239,193,000  $205,194,000 

Source: CDM Smith 

Section 3: Ohio Airport Funding Theoperationofanairportinvolvesavarietyofcosts.Theday‐to‐dayoperatingexpensesaregenerallytheresponsibilityofthelocalsponsor,whichendeavorstocoverthosecoststhroughrevenuegeneratedbytheairportintheformofleases,fuelfees,concessionfees,andotherratesandcharges.Atsomeairports,especiallysmallergeneralaviationairports,countiesorlocalmunicipalitiessubsidizetheoperationoftheairportwhenairportgeneratedrevenuesareinsufficienttocoveralloperatingcosts.

Inadditiontooperatingexpenses,airportsalsoincurcapitalcostsfromlargeprojectsthatmaintain,upgrade,orexpandtheairport’sinfrastructure.Mostgeneralaviationairports,andmanycommercialserviceairports,donothavetheresourcestoaffordthesecapitalprojectsandturntootherfundingsourcestoaidinthedevelopmentofairportcapitalinfrastructure.Thisissimilartootherpubliclyheldentitiesthatprovideaservicetothegeneralpublic(e.g.,parksandroads).

FundingforcapitalprojectsonOhio’sairportscomesfromavarietyofsources.ThethreeprimaryfundingsourcesforgeneralaviationairportprojectsincludefederalgrantsfromtheFederalAviationAdministration(FAA),OhioDepartmentofTransportation(ODOT)grants,andpublic/privatefunding.Public/privatefundingmustbeprovidedforallcoststypicallynoteligibleforfederalorstategrants.

Federal Aviation Administration Grants FederalfundingforairportsmostoftencomesfromFederalAviationAdministration(FAA)grants.TheFAAhasalonghistoryofgrantfundingintendedtopromotethedevelopmentofairportstomeetthenation’sneeds.AfterWorldWarII,thefederalgovernmentembarkedonaGrants‐In‐AidProgramtounitsofstateandlocalgovernment.Thisearlyprogram,theFederalAidAirportProgram(FAAP),wasauthorizedbytheFederalTreasuryActof1946andprovideditsfundingfromtheTreasury.

AmorecomprehensiveprogramwasestablishedwiththepassageoftheAirportandAirwayDevelopmentActof1970.ThisactprovidedgrantsforairportplanningunderthePlanningGrantProgram(PGP)andforairportdevelopmentundertheAirportDevelopmentAidProgram(ADAP).TheseprogramswerefundedfromanewlyestablishedAirportandAirwayTrustFund,whichreceivedfundsfromtaxesonairlinetickets,airfreight,andaviationfuel.TheauthoritytoissuegrantsunderthesetwoprogramsexpiredonSeptember30,1981.

TheAirportImprovementProgram(AIP)wasestablishedbytheAirportandAirwayImprovementActof1982.TheinitialAIPprovidedfundinglegislationthroughfiscalyear1992.Sincethen,CongresshasauthorizedandappropriatedfundsforAIPprojectsonayearlybasis.

Page 91: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐91

Fundingforthisprogramisgeneratedfromataxonairlinetickets,freightwaybills,internationaldeparturefees,generalaviationfuel,andaviationjetfuel.TheFAAusesthesefundstoprovidegrantsateligibleairportsundertheAIP.

FederalAirportImprovementFundsmustbespentonFAAeligibleprojectsasdefinedinFAAOrder5100.38“AirportImprovementProgram(AIP)Handbook.”Ingeneral,thehandbookstatesthat:

AnairportmustbeinthecurrentlyapprovedNationalPlanofIntegratedAirportSystems(NPIAS).

Mostpublic‐useairportsimprovementsareeligiblefor90percentfederalfunding,withtheremaining10percentcomingfromlocalorstatematchingfunds.

Generalaviationterminalbuildings,T‐hangars,andcorporatehangarsandotherprivate‐usefacilitiesarenoteligibleforfederalfundingundertheAIPprogram.

Inaddition,revenue‐producingitemstypicallyarenotgenerallyeligibleforfederalfunding,andalleligibleprojectsmustbedepictedonanFAA‐approvedAirportLayoutPlan.

In2001,anon‐primaryairportentitlementprogramwasauthorized.Thisprogramprovidedupto$150,000inFAAgrantfundseachyeartogeneralaviationairportsthatwerelistedintheNPIASandwerenotaprimaryserviceairportprovidingairlineserviceforpassengers.Underthisprogram,theFAApays90percentofallengineering,inspection,testing,landacquisition,administrative,andconstructioncostsforeligibleprojects.Thesponsormustpayalocal10percentmatch.Whenthisprogramwasrenewedin2004,certainrevenueproducingitemsofwork,likeT‐hangarsandfuelfacilities,couldbeconsideredforfundingbytheFAA,butonlyonceallsafetyrelatedimprovementshadbeencompleted.TheFAArevisedtherequirementsforsuchgrantstorequirethattherearenosafetyrelatedneedsforthreeyears.

FAAgrantsarefundedthroughtheAviationTrustFundascollectedthroughuser‐generatedtaxesanddistributedinaccordancewiththeFAAAIPbyentitlementformulaordiscretionaryprovisions.TherearethreetypesofFAAgrants.

FAA Entitlement Grants Generalaviationairports(andcommercialserviceairportswithfewerthan10,000commercialenplanements)areeligibletoreceivenon‐primaryentitlementgrantsofupto$150,000peryear.FAAentitlementfundsprovidefor90percentofthecostofeligibleprojectswitha10percentlocalmatchrequired.ThesefundscanbededicatedforAIP‐eligibleprojectsandcanbecarriedoverandaccumulateuptofouryearsforatotalof$600,000.

FAA Discretionary Grants AnyremainingAIPfundsatthenationallevelnotmandatedbyset‐asidesorassignedtoentitlementsaredesignatedasdiscretionaryfunds,andmaybeusedforfundingeligibleFAAprojects.Discretionaryfundsareairportandprojectspecific,andbasedonthenationalprioritysystem.Eligiblediscretionaryprojectsaretypicallythosethatenhanceairportcapacity,addressnoise,orenhancesafetyandsecurity,oraredirectedtocertainnationalprojectpriorities.Discretionaryfunds,whichvaryfromyear‐to‐year,providefor90percentofthecostofeligibleprojectswithlocalorstatefundsprovidingthe10percentmatch.

Page 92: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐92

FAA State Apportionment Grants FAAfundsmadeavailabletostatesundervariousconditions,asapportionedbasedonanarea/populationformulawithinthe50states.ThedistributionofthesegrantsisdecidedthroughacollaborativeeffortbetweentheFAAandOhioDOT.

OthersourcesofFAAfundingincludeFacilitiesandEquipmentfundingforfacilitiessuchasairtrafficcontroltowersandsomerunwayinstrumentation.ThisfundingisseparatefromtheAIPprogram.Federalnoisefundsmayalsobeavailablefornoisemitigationprojects.

Ohio Department of Transportation Grants TheOhioDepartmentofTransportationhasagrantprogramforgeneralaviationairports.TheODOTOfficeofAviationgrantspay90percentoftheeligiblecostsforconstructionandconstructionengineering,leaving10percentthatthelocalsponsormustprovide.Theairportsponsorisalsoresponsiblefornon‐eligibleconstructioncosts,preliminaryengineering,environmentalstudies,permitsanddocuments,finaldesignengineering,rightofway,andutilities.

Typically,thesegrantsgotowardpavementrehabilitationandobstructionremovalprojects.Withapproximately$1millionavailableingrantfundingannually,ODOTOfficeofAviationcanfundapproximately10projectseachyear.Twosourcesofrevenueprovidethesefunds.AlittlemorethanhalfcomesfromOhioaircraftregistrationfeeswiththeremaindercomingfromthestategeneralfund.

Local Funding Thesponsoroftheairporttypicallyprovideslocalfunding.SuchfundingmustbeusedtomakeupthebalanceafterFAAandODOTparticipationforthegrant‐eligibleprojectcosts.Sponsorfundsaregeneratedbyairportsfromfuelsales,leaseagreements,andothersimilarincomes,andcanbesupplementedbylocalmunicipalities.Commercialserviceairportshavetheadditionaloptionofgeneratingrevenuethroughapassengerfacilitycharge(PFC).WithFAAapproval,theairportcanlevyaPFCofupto$4.50oneachenplaningpassenger.

Anotherpotentialsourceoflocalfundsforairportimprovementsisfromprivateinvestorsanddonors.Privateinvestorsmayconstructneededfacilitiesaspartofaleaseagreementwithanairportthatwillallowthemtoamortizetheirinvestmentsovertime.Thistypeoffundingisparticularlysuitableforhangardevelopment.Insomeinstancesairportusersmayagreetodonatefundsforspecificimprovements,suchaslightingornavigationalequipment,becauseitwillassisttheminconductingoperationsattheairport.

 

Page 93: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐93

Historic Airport Grant Funding in Ohio Table8‐18showsthehistoryofairportgrantfundingtoOhio’sairportsfromfiscalyear2010to2013.

Table8‐18HistoryofAirportGrantFundinginOhio

Funding Source  FY2010  FY2011  FY2012  FY2013 

FAA Funding (in millions of $) 

Commercial Service 

Entitlement  $17.2  $19.0  $15.4  $13.2 

Discretionary  $54.4  $47.9  $19.8  $10.2 

General Aviation 

Entitlement  $17.3  $17.6  $21.2  $14.2 

Discretionary  $1.9  $0.8  $6.9  $11.1 

Total FAA Funding  $90.8  $85.3  $63.4  $48.7 

ODOT Office of Aviation Funding  $1.4  $0.9  $0.7  $1.0 

Total ODOT and FAA Funding  $92.2  $86.2  $64.1  $49.7 

Source: FAA and ODOT. Prepared June 2014. 

Overthepastfourfiscalyears,entitlementfundinghasaveragedapproximately$30million.Asshowninthetable,entitlementfundinghasbeenfairlyevenlysplitbetweencommercialserviceandgeneralaviationairportsinOhio.Themajorityofdiscretionarygrants,however,havegonetothecommercialserviceairportsinOhio.Onlyinfiscalyear2013didgeneralaviationairportsreceivemoreindiscretionarygrantsthandidcommercialserviceairports.Additionally,discretionarygrantshavehistoricallyaccountedforalargershareofthetotalairportgrantmoneyinOhio,withthenotableexceptionoffiscalyear2013.

Asseeninthetable,grantfundingfromODOTaveragednomorethan$1millionperyearandconstitutesasmallfractionofthetotalgrantmoneyusedbyOhio’sairports.

ThelargestdropinfundingresultedfromadeclineinFAAdiscretionaryfundingofOhio’scommercialserviceairports.From2010to2013,commercialserviceairportdiscretionaryfundingdroppedmorethan$44million.ThiswaslargelyduetothecompletionofrunwaysafetyareaimprovementsandarunwayprojectatClevelandHopkinsInternational,andthecompletionofarunwayextensionatAkron‐CantonRegional.

Summary Ohio’sairportsreceivegrantmoneyfromavarietyofsources,butthemajorityisprovidedbytheFAAintheformofentitlementanddiscretionarygrants.Thisgrantmoneyhasfluctuatedovertheyears,withaslittleas$50millioninfiscalyear2013andasmuchas$90millioninfiscalyear2010.Withoutgrantmoney,mostairportsinOhiowouldhavedifficultyoperating.

Conclusion Ohio’ssystemofairportsprovidesthestatewithexceptionalgeographiccoverage.Thissystemincludesavarietyofairporttypeswithafullcomplementoffacilitiesandavailableservicesservingalltypesofaircraft.Still,therearepotentialimprovementsthatthissystemplanidentifiesthatcouldmakeOhio’ssystemevenbetter.Recommendedimprovementswerediscussedfortwodistinctareas:

Page 94: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐94

FactorsrelatedtocompliancewithFAA/ODOTgrantassurances Factorsrelatedtomeetingfacilityandservicebenchmarksidentifiedforeachcategoryof

systemairport

RecommendationsrelatedtocompliancefactorsfocusedonissuesrelatedtoFAAgrantassurancesthataretypicallyeligibleforFAAfundingassistance.TheseincludedRSAimpactsandobtainingfeesimpleRPZcontrolforsystemairportsprimaryrunways.Inaddition,thenecessaryupkeepandcontinuedmaintenanceofOhio’sairportpavementwasassessedforthenext20years.ItshouldbenotedthattherecommendationchapterfocusessolelyonOhio’sgeneralaviationairports.

Throughairportself‐reportingduringtheinventoryeffortandareviewofODOTairportinspectionletters,itwasdeterminedthat31generalaviationairportscurrentlyhaveanidentifiedRSAconcernontheirprimaryrunways.Theserangefromrelativelyminorissuessuchastheneedforgradingtosignificantconcernssuchasthepresenceofroadsorotherfixedobjects.Planninglevelcostestimateswerepreparedforeachimpactedairport.Intotal,nearly$41.6millioninRSAimprovementswereidentifiedtocorrecteachnoteddeficiency.ForsomeairportswithsignificantRSAissues,asecondscenariowasdevelopedtolookatmorecosteffectivesolutions.Thesesolutionsincludedtheapplicationofdeclareddistances.Whilethesecondscenarioidentifiedatotalcostestimateofonly$6.4million,theuseofdeclareddistancesresultedinreducedrunwaylengthsatmanyairports.ThesetwocostestimatesservetoshowtherangeofoptionsavailabletobringthesystemintocompliancewithRSAstandards.

FAAgrantassurancesrequirethatanairportcontrolitsRPZ.Accordingtothedatacollectedduringtheinventoryeffort,33systemairportscontrolthefullRPZfortheirprimaryrunway.Theremainingairportsindicatedthatsomeportionoftheirprimaryrunway’sRPZwasnotcontrolled.Planninglevelcostswerepreparedtoestimatethecosttoacquire,infee,theuncontrolledportionofeachsystemairport’sRPZ.Itshouldbenotedthatthiscostestimateisonlyfortheuncontrolledportion,additionalacquisitionwasnotevaluatedtoavoidleavingirregularparcelsorotherpotentialoccurrencesthatoftenincreasetheexpenseofRPZlandacquisition.Nearly$14.2millioninexpensesrelatedtolandacquisitionwasidentifiedtocompletelycontroltheRPZsatgeneralaviationairportsinOhio.

Ohio’sairportshavemadeatremendousinvestmentinrunwaysandotherpavements.Maintainingthisexistinginfrastructureiscriticaltotheoverallhealthofthesystem.Overthenext20years,morethan$457millionisexpectedtoberequiredtoimproveandmaintainOhio’sexistingsystemofairports.

Thesystemplanidentifiedtheprimarymarketsegmenteachairportcurrentlyserves.Facilityandservicebenchmarkswereestablished,withextensiveinputfromtheprojectadvisorycommittee,earlyinthesystemplanningprocess.Itwasrecommendedthateachairportprovidethefullrangeoffacilitiesassociatedwiththeircurrentclassification.Theserangefromminimumrecommendedrunwaylengthstosupportfacilitiessuchasnavaids,weatherreporting,andfencing.Again,allsystembenchmarkrecommendationsarebasedontheairport’scurrentsystemplancategory(Level1through4).ItshouldbenotedthatsystemplanrecommendationsdonotsupersederecommendationsfromindividualairportmasterplansormakeaprojecteligibleforFAAorODOTfunding.

Intotal,nearly$335millioninperformancebenchmarkimprovementswereidentified.Thisincludesmorethan$239millioninARCupgradesnotedforeachairporttoreachthesystemclassificationrecommendation.ItwasrecognizedthatitmaybeimpracticalformanyairportstoenhancetheirARC,soasecondscenarioofcostestimateswaspreparedthatfocusedonnon‐ARC‐

Page 95: Chapter 8 - Recommendations FINAL updated 2...the implementation of declared distances, and other options such as engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS), a system designed to

SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS     2014 

   OHIO AIRPORTS FOCUS STUDY  8‐95

relatedbenchmarks.Thesenon‐ARCbenchmarkimprovementswereestimatedtocostmorethan$205million.

TheoverallsystemanalysisfoundthatOhio’sairportsystemisdoingatremendousjobmeetingtheneedsofOhio’spopulation.Over98percentofOhioiswith30‐minutes’driveofasystemfacility.Stillsystemimprovementswillbeneededtoenhanceandmaintainthissystem.Withincreasingcompetitionforscarcefederalandstatefunding,thissystemplanwillbeoneofmanytoolsavailablefordecisionmakerstoassessairportneedsatthesystemlevel.

 


JUSTICON Event Monitoring & Alert System (EMAS) Introduction

emAS Identity and Access Management System · AS emAS Identity and Access Management System Sponsored by Controller of Certifying Authorities, AATL Ministry of InformationTechnology,

EMAS - Engineered Material Arrestor System (seminar ppt)

DFA Series Detonation Flame Arrestor (USCG/ATEX …€¦ · Figure 1. Typical DFA Series Detonation Flame Arrestor DFA Series Detonation Flame Arrestor (USCG/ATEX Approved)! WArninG

HSE Flashback Arrestor Guidance

Flame arrestor research

Transport Canada’s•Use of Engineered Material Arrestor Systems (EMAS) •RESA Construction and Maintenance •Procedures for the Development and Submission of ICAO Type A Charts

EMAS - Engineered Material Arrestor System

Flame arrestor

Landslide Mapping in Vegetated Areas Using Change ......new Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations, the construction of an Engineered Material Arrestor System (EMAS)

Developments in Technology Arrestor EMASMAX® Events/Safety...“The absence of an Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) installation in the limited overrun area (RESA) for Runway

h51 Catalogue 3es Surge Arrestor

Environmental Management System - EMAS - Cluster Approach - Michele preziosi UniRomaTre

Engineering Materials Arresting System (EMAS)

FLAME ARRESTOR - '+domain name+'€¢ INLINE FLAME ARRESTOR• END OF LINE FLAME ARRESTOR Types of Flame Arrestors INLINE END OF LINE Flame Arrestor Element E-mail: [email protected]

LIGHTNING ARRESTOR - Ramm Fence Arrestor Installation.pdf · LIGHTNING ARRESTOR Installation Guide For questions or help contact RAMM Horse Fencing and Stalls at 800-853-1611 The

MCF lightning arrestor - OBO CMS

Lightning Arrestor

Crack Arrestor

Water Hammer Arrestor - Engineer's Handbook

Composite Water Hammer Arrestor - Amtrol

Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) - COSCAP-NA EMAS_0_0.pdf · An Advanced Technology for Aircraft Overrunning Runway— — Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS)

Introduction SUrge Arrestor

· PDF fileand fuel pump ref class part 28941 54090 1 33047 70143 pads list descri tion assembly stljd. flame arrestor des:gn stud. flame arrestor-new design flame arrestor stud

RCMIN CONVEYOR BELT ARRESTOR

Lighting Arrestor

Engineering Critical Assessment of Buckle Arrestor

Intermediate Class Surge arrestor

Ecosol™ Silt Arrestor Maintenance Guide

Surge Arrestor in MV Networks

Spark Arrestor C

Distribution Class Surge arrestor

Switching Surge Arrestor for Railways

fall arrestor

8. Catalogue Lightning Arrestor Dehn