chapter 9 prosocial behavior. chapter outline defining prosocial behavior goals of prosocial...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 9Chapter 9
Prosocial BehaviorProsocial Behavior
Chapter OutlineDefining Prosocial Behavior
Goals of Prosocial Behavior
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Managing Self-Image
Managing Our Moods and Emotions
Does Pure Altruism Exist?
Defining Prosocial Behavior
Prosocial
Behavior
Benevolence
Pure
Altruism
Type of Behavior
Defining Prosocial Behavior
Prosocial
Behavior
Benevolence
Pure
Altruism
Definition Example
Type of Behavior
Defining Prosocial Behavior
Prosocial Prosocial
BehaviorBehavior
Benevolence
Pure
Altruism
Definition Example
Any action intended to
benefit another
(regardless of motive)
Giving a Giving a large tip to large tip to a waiter to a waiter to
impress impress your boss your boss with your with your generositygenerosity
Type of Behavior
Defining Prosocial Behavior
Prosocial
Behavior
BenevolenceBenevolence
Pure
Altruism
Definition Example
Benefits another
intentionally for no
external reward
AnonymousAnonymously sending ly sending $20 to a $20 to a
charity to charity to make make
yourself feel yourself feel good insidegood inside
Type of Behavior
Defining Prosocial Behavior
Prosocial
Behavior
Benevolence
Pure Pure
AltruismAltruism
Definition Example
Benefits another
intentionally for no
external or internal reward
Spontaneo-Spontaneo-usly usly
jumping on jumping on a railroad a railroad track to track to help a help a
stranger stranger who has who has
fallenfallen
Goals of Prosocial Behavior
• Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
• Gaining Social Status and Approval
• Managing Self-Image
• Managing Our Moods and Emotions
Defining Prosocial Behavior
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
Insights into the Evolution of HelpInclusive Fitness -
The ability of one’s genes to survive in one’s own offspring AND in any relatives one helps.
• Animals share more genes with siblings > nephews > cousins
• Helping a close relative promotes the survival of those genes
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
Genetic Relatedness and Helping
Would you lend your car to your brother?What about your grandfather?What about a cousin? What about an attractive stranger? Michael Cunningham and his colleagues
asked people whether they would be willing to help other people in different situations
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefitsesearchesearch
8080
6060
2020
00
High(parents, siblings, children)
High(parents, siblings, children)
Cunningham et al., (1995)Cunningham et al., (1995)esearchesearch
Percentage Volunteering
to Help
Percentage Volunteering
to Help
4040
Degree of RelatednessDegree of Relatedness
Mod. (grand-parents)
Mod. (grand-parents)
Low (first
cousins)
Low (first
cousins)
None (attractive strangers)
None (attractive strangers)
Insights into the Evolution of Help
Reciprocal Aid -
Help that occurs in return for prior help
• Other animals will help non-relatives if they live in close proximity and can better survive by sharing.
• People working for organizations who provide more benefits work harder for the firm.
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
Learning to Help: The sense of “We”
Similarity and Familiarity
Types of Helpers, Victims, and Need
Children exposed to others of different ethnic and religious backgrounds later develop a feeling of “we-ness” with the larger human family (Piliavin et al., 1981)
Expanded sense of “we”
European Gentiles who helped Jews escape from Nazis were exposed to more different ethnicities growing up than were non-helpers (Oliner & Oliner, 1988)
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
Similarity and Familiarity
Similarity may be a cue to genetic relatedness (our relatives look like us)
In 34 studies, 29 found significantly higher helping for similar over dissimilar others (Dovidio, 1984)
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
Similarity and Familiarity
Familiarity may also be a cue to genetic relatedness
If familiarity is associated with shared genes, helping familiar others would have generally helped relatives (Schroeder, Penner, Dovidio, & Piliavin, 1995)
In animal and human societies, familiarity increases helping.
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
Types of Victims, Helpers, and Need
The tendency to help relatives is stronger when the help is more related to survival
Participants in one study were asked to imagine scenarios like the following:
Gaining Genetic and Material Benefits
There are three people asleep in different rooms of a burning house:
• A cousin
• A grandfather
• An acquaintance
You have time to rescue only one.
Which do you save?
Burnstein, Crandall, & Kitayama, 1994esearchesearch
Types of Victims, Helpers, and Need
There are three people who need you to run a small errand to the store:
• A cousin
• A sister
• An acquaintance
You have time to help only one.
Whose errand do you run?
Burnstein, Crandall, & Kitayama, 1994esearchesearch
Types of Victims, Helpers, and Need
3.03.0
2.52.5
1.51.5
1.01.0
High(parents, siblings, children)
High(parents, siblings, children)
Burnstein, Crandall, & Kitayama (1994)Burnstein, Crandall, & Kitayama (1994)esearchesearch
Tendency to Help
Tendency to Help
2.02.0
Degree of RelatednessDegree of Relatedness
Mod. (grand-parents)
Mod. (grand-parents)
Low (first
cousins)
Low (first
cousins)
None (acquaintances) None (acquaintances)
For everyday help, people tended to help close relatives more than non-relatives
For everyday help, people tended to help close relatives more than non-relatives
3.03.0
2.52.5
1.51.5
1.01.0
High(parents, siblings, children)
High(parents, siblings, children)
Burnstein, Crandall, & Kitayama (1994)Burnstein, Crandall, & Kitayama (1994)esearchesearch
Tendency to Help
Tendency to Help
2.02.0
Degree of RelatednessDegree of Relatedness
Mod. (grand-parents)
Mod. (grand-parents)
Low (first
cousins)
Low (first
cousins)
The difference became even more pronounced
in life-or-death situations
The difference became even more pronounced
in life-or-death situations
None (acquaintances) None (acquaintances)
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Social Responsibility norm -
Societal rule that people should help those who need their assistance.
Gaining Social Status and Approval
The bystander effect –
individuals who observe an emergency are less likely to help when others are present than when they are alone.
Diffusion of responsibility -
Tendency for each group member to dilute personal responsibility for acting by spreading it among all other group members.
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Bystanders as sources of help
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Bystanders as sources of help
The Kitty Genovese Story
Pluralistic Ignorance -
Phenomenon that occurs when bystanders to an emergency, trying to look poised, give misleading cues to others that no help is needed
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Bystanders as sources of information about helping
In one study, researchers pumped smoke into a lab while students filled out a questionnaire.
• Some students were left alone• Some with 2 other real participants• Some with 2 other confederates who
pretended nothing was wrong
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Bystanders as sources of information about helping
8080
6060
2020
00
Alone Alone
Latane & Darley (1968)Latane & Darley (1968)esearchesearch
Percentage Reporting
Smoke
Percentage Reporting
Smoke
4040
With 2 other real
subjects
With 2 other real
subjects
With 2 calm confederates With 2 calm confederates
Results suggest that people look to others to provide information.
If no one else seems upset, that suggests this isn’t an emergency.
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Bystanders as sources of information about helping
Sometimes people assume help would be seen as an unwelcome intrusion.
• When a woman fighting with a man shouted: “I don’t even know you!” - help more likely than if she shouted:
• “I don’t know why I married you!” (Shotland & Straw, 1976)
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Bystanders as sources of approval or disapproval
Others as Sources of
Help
The Helping DecisionThe Helping Decision
Others as Sources of Whether
Helping is Called For
Others as Sources of
Approval or Disapproval for
Helping
Effects of Onlookers on Decisions to HelpEffects of Onlookers on Decisions to Help
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Need for Approval
Awareness of the Helping Norm
Helping Models
Gender and Help
Students who score higher on a scale measuring the need for approval from others donate more money;
But only if the donation is public
Need for Approval
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Very young children are not aware of the norm requiring people to help those in need.
Between 6 and 9 years of age, they become aware of the norm.
At this age, they will help IF an adult is present (Froming, Allen, & Jensen, 1985)
Awareness of the Helping Norm
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Helping Models
Observing another giving help can teach young children about the helping norm.
For adults, a model can remind them of the helping norm.
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Gender and HelpWomen are universally perceived as kinder,
more soft-hearted, and more helpful (Williams & Best, 1990)
But over 90% of Carnegie Hero awards go to men (for saving, or attempting to save, the life of another).
Why?
Gaining Social Status and Approval
Managing Self-Image
Managing Self-Image
Personal Norms
Labeling
Deciding Not to Help Friends or to Seek their Help
Self-Focus
Religious Codes
Personal Norm -
Internalized beliefs and values that combine to form a person’s inner standards for behavior.
(example: I believe that I personally should give blood to the blood bank)
Personal Norms & Religious Codes
Managing Self-Image
People who define themselves as highly committed to their spiritual beliefs are, compared to the less committed, twice as likely to volunteer time to help the needy (Gallup, 1984)
Personal Norms & Religious Codes
Managing Self-Image
Labeling a child as “kind and helpful” increases his or her later willingness to donate prizes to other children (Grusec & Redler, 1980)
Labeling and Self-focus
Managing Self-Image
Self-Focus
Lower Helping LikelihoodLower Helping Likelihood
? Are My Personal Problems
Small
?
Is Victim’s Need
Prominent
Higher Helping LikelihoodHigher Helping Likelihood
?
Is Victim’s Need
Legitimate
?
Internal Focus on Value of Helping
YesYesYesYes
YesYes
NONO NONONONO
NONO
YesYes
SELF FOCUS
Deciding not to help friends or seek help
In one study, students gave more clues to friends than to strangers playing a non self relevant game;
But, they gave more clues to strangers when the task was said to reflect intelligence (Tesser & Smith, 1980)
WHY?
Gaining or Maintaining Social Status
Failing to seek needed help
Gender: Males are generally less likely to request help than females.
Age: Children after age 7 and 8 realize that asking for help may reflect poorly on their esteem.
After age 60, there is another drop.
Focus on Social Dysfunction
Failing to seek needed help
Self-esteem: High self-esteem individuals are LESS likely to seek help.
KEY: people fail to ask for needed help to avoid lower self-esteem.
Focus on Social Dysfunction
Managing Our Emotions and Moods
Arousal/Cost-reward model -
View that observers of suffering help to relieve their own personal distress (Dovidio, Piliavin, Gaertner, Schroeder, & Clark, 1991)
We will help in emergency if:
Managing our Emotions and Moods
Managing Emotional Arousal in Emergencies
Increased Increased Chance Chance
That Help That Help Will Be Will Be OfferedOffered
Increased Increased Chance Chance
That Help That Help Will Be Will Be OfferedOffered
Observation of Another
in Clear Need of Aid
Increased Negative
Emotional Arousal
if Cost of Helping is
Small
if Rewards are Large
if Arousal is strong
if “We” connection
Arousal/Cost-Reward Model of HelpingArousal/Cost-Reward Model of Helping
Mood management hypothesis -
Idea that people use helping tactically to manage their moods
Throughout life, we learn that helping others can lead to rewards.
This reward makes us feel good, and we learn to use helping to manage our mood.
Managing our Emotions and Moods
Managing Emotional Arousal in Non- Emergencies
Managing Moods and Emotions
Presence of Sadness
Costs/Benefits of Helping
Gourmets and Gourmands
Helping can be increased by events triggering temporary sadness:
• Reminiscing about unhappy experiences
• Reading depressing statements
• Failing at a task
• Witnessing harm to another
Presence of Sadness
Managing our Emotions and Moods
Students in one study were put into either:
• happy
• sad or
• neutral mood
Then given an opportunity to help a non-profit organization
Costs/benefits of HelpingManaging our Emotions and Moods
The benefits of helping were either:
• Low - help was for Little League
• High - American Cancer Society
Costs of helping were either:
• Low: Sit at donations desk
• High: Collect door-to-door
Costs/benefits of HelpingManaging our Emotions and Moods
esearchesearch
8080
6060
2020
00
Happy Happy
Weyant (1976)Weyant (1976)
esearchesearch%
Vol
un
teer
ing
% V
olu
nte
erin
g
4040
MoodMoodNeutralNeutral
BenefitBenefitLowLow HighHigh
CostCost LowLow
HighHighHappy students helped
more than those in a neutral mood, with
little regard for costs and benefits
Happy students helped more than those in a neutral mood, with
little regard for costs and benefits
8080
6060
2020
00
Happy Happy
Weyant (1976)Weyant (1976)
esearchesearch%
Vol
un
teer
ing
% V
olu
nte
erin
g
4040
MoodMoodNeutralNeutral Sad Sad
BenefitBenefitLowLow HighHigh
CostCost LowLow
HighHigh
But students in a sad mood only helped
when benefits were high, and costs were low
But students in a sad mood only helped
when benefits were high, and costs were low
Gourmets and Gourmands
Those in sad moods are like gourmets - with hearty appetites but picky tastes
They help more if the opportunity is a good one; but less if it is a poor one.
Managing our Emotions and Moods
People in a positive mood act like gourmands - of hearty appetite, but indiscriminate taste.
They avail themselves of any opportunity to help
Gourmets and Gourmands
People in a positive mood seem to view themselves and their environments in positive terms.
When everything is positive, we are generally less concerned with scanning the details of the environment.
Managing our Emotions and Moods
Does Pure Altruism Exist?
Components:
Perspective-Taking - The process of mentally putting oneself in another’s position.
Empathic Concern - Compassionate feelings caused by taking the perspective of a needy other.
Does Pure Altruism Exist?
Students in one experiment were given the opportunity to help a suffering student (Elaine) by taking her place in an electric shock experiment.
Half could easily escape the whole situation by leaving immediately.
The other half would have to stay and watch as she received the remaining shocks.
Does Pure Altruism Exist?
Students given the easy opportunity to escape usually took it.
But if they felt high empathy for Elaine
They were more likely to help her out.
Dan Batson and colleagues argue that empathy engages pure altruism, and overrides selfish motivations.
An egoistic alternative
Cialdini and his colleagues argue that there is an egoistic explanation of these findings:
Empathy causes an observer to feel kinship with the victim, thus tapping into a basic selfish motivation – to serve myself by serving those who share my genes.