chapter vii - inflibnetshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/89764/8/chapter 7.pdf · chapter...
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPter VII
APPlICAtIon of CHItInAse
CHAPTER VII Page 128
7.1 INTRODUCTION
Chitinases belongs to the class of hydrolytic enzymes with a potential to inhibit or
degrade the chitin containing pathogens like fungi, insects and their larva’s. The use of
chitinases as a bio control agent is one of the attractive and environmentally safe strategies.
Chitinolytic enzymes have various potential applications such as preparation of
chitooligosaccharides and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine which are known to have various
biological activities (antimicrobial, antifungal, immunoenhancers, antitumor, etc.) (Tsai et al.,
2000; Shen et al., 2009) with high interest in the pharmaceutical sector (Wen et al., 2002).
Moreover, chitinases can be used for the control of pathogenic fungi in agriculture (Dahiya et
al., 2005a) and the degradation of crustacean chitinous waste in sea food industry. These
enzymes are also useful for the preparation of single-cell protein, the isolation of protoplasts
from fungi and yeast, etc. (Dahiya et al., 2006).
Biological control, using microorganisms to suppress plant disease, offers powerful
and alternative to use of synthetic chemical. Chitinolytic bacteria such as Aeromonas
hydrophila, A. caviae, Pseudomonas maltophila, Bacillus licheniformis, B. circulans, Vibrio
furnissii, Xanthomonas sp. and Serratia marcescens have been reported and played important
role as biological control agents. Biological control using microorganism has been studied
intensifely since not many alternatives to control are available (Duffy et al. 1995).
Furthermore, chitinases together with proteases, glucanases and cellulases are
frequently considered critical in the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi (Gohel et al.,
2006a). Chitinases occupy a unique position in agricultural biotechnology because the lytic
activity inhibits fungal development by degrading chitin and glucan components of cell wall
and have proven potential as antifungal agents (Jung et al., 2003; Punja and Zhang, 1993).
Chitinases therefore play vital role in agricultural industries and medical fields, furthermore,
chitinases also play vital roles in sea food industry for crustacean chitinous waste
degradation. To accelerate identification of optimal chitinase formulations to function
broadly in a range of environments for the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi, for
cytochemical localization of chitin/chitosan using chitinase–chitosanase–gold complex, for
fungal protoplast technology, for preparation of chitooligosaccharides and for degradation of
chitinous waste (Vaidya et al., 2003b), we have gained a fundamental understanding of
behaviour of chitinase molecules in various conditions. Health, environmental concern,
development of resistance in target populations also contributes to developing biological
control using natural enemies (Martin and Loper, 1999). Nonetheless, the vast array of
CHAPTER VII Page 129
antimicrobial molecules produced by diverse soil microbes remains as a reservoir of new and
potentially safer biopesticides (Kang et al., 1998).
In recent years, there has been a constant increase in the exploitation of fish resources
and the estimated quantity used for human consumption (105.6 million tons) is globally 75 %
of the worldwide fish production. The remaining 25 % of the catch (34.8 million tons) are
considered as wastes (FAO, 2007). Furthermore, the commercial fish processing industry
generates large quantities of solid waste and wastewater. Solid waste which represents 20–60
% of the initial raw material contains various kinds of residues (whole waste fish, fish head,
viscera, skin, bones, blood, frame liver, gonads, guts, some muscle tissue, etc.) (Awarenet,
2004). In some countries, these discards are not utilized, but incinerated or dumped at sea
causing environmental problems (Bozzano and Sarda, 2002). Recently, environmental
regulations are becoming stricter, requiring new disposal methods based on the fact that fish
wastes (solid waste and wastewater) may considered as an important source of protein, lipids
and minerals with high biological value (Toppe et al., 2007; Kacem et al., 2011).
The disposal of wastes generated by fishery processing industries represents an increasing
environmental and health problem. However, these by-products have attracted considerable
attention as an alternative feedstock and energy source, since they are abundantly available.
Various microbes are capable of using these substances as carbon and energy sources
beneficial in enzyme production process. A number of such substrates have been tested for
the cultivation of microorganisms to produce several enzymes (protease, lipase, chitinases,
peroxidases, laccases, oxidases, etc.). This may have numerous advantages for enzyme
production process, such as superior productivity, simpler techniques, reduced energy
requirements and reduced production costs. Generally, fish waste pre-treatments may be
necessary to maximize microbial growth and enzyme production. However, each microbial
strain has its own special conditions for maximum enzyme production. Therefore, it is of
great significance to optimize the medium composition, taking into consideration the
variability of fish waste composition, the nutrient requirements of microbial strain and
fermentation parameters (pH, temperature, aeration, agitation, etc.). Nevertheless, the
improvements in fish waste technology (pre-treatments, characterization, formulation, etc.)
are still necessary before large-scale application of this new strategy can be realized.
Microbial chitinase has been produced by liquid fermentation processes (batch,
continuous and fed-batch fermentation) and is commercially available at a high cost (Dahiya
et al. 2006). Generally, the production is controlled by physical factors (aeration, pH, and
incubation temperature) and by the growth media components (Miyashita et al., 1991). In
CHAPTER VII Page 130
order to increase the supply of active chitinase, it is necessary to reduce the production cost
by using wastes for microbial growth. In this perspective, various chitinous materials from
marine sources [shrimp shell powder (SSP), squid pen powder (SPP), shrimp and crab shell
powder (SCSP)] have been utilized for chitinolytic enzyme production as alternative to waste
disposal. The use chitinase for production of chitiooligosaccharide and NAG is one of the
major applications for human health care and biotechnological sector. There are few reports
on industrially available production of NAG from chitin by using chitinolytic enzymes since
the enzyme reaction on chitin progress is very slowly and also yield is very low from the
standpoint of practical use. Chitinase can also be employed for the biocontrol of plant
pathogens and for developing transgenic plants. Although biocontrol of plant pathogenic
fungi using chitinase producing microorganisms and plant has been studies extensively but
more work is required for studying microbes-microbes, microbes-plant and chitinase-microbe
interaction which would be of great help in using chitinase as a biocontrol agent. Developing
a bioprocess for production of N-acetyl –D-glucosamine from chitin will be a novel
approach.
CHAPTER VII Page 131
7.2 MATERIAL AND METHODS
7.2.1 Antifungal activity of crude chitinase
To evaluate the effect of culture filtrate on radial growth of fungi the experiment was
conducted according to the method of Prapagdee et al., (2007). Culture filtrate was added into
warm molten PDA (Appendix 1) (45ºC) to give final concentration at 10, 20 and 30% (V/V)
and placed until solidfied. The control plate was added equal volume of sterile distilled water
instead of culture filtrate. Each plate was seeded with 6mm diameter mycelial plugs taken
from the margin of 5 day old fungal plate. Inoculated plates were incubated at 28ºC and fungal
growth was recorded at every 24 hrs until those of the control plate reaching the edge of the
plate. The fungal growth inhibition was expressed as the percentage of inhibition of radial
growth relative to the control as shown in equation. Inhibition of radial growth (%) = Diameter of control sample - Diameter of test× 100
Diameter of control sample
7.2.2 Production of N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine from the degradation of chitinous waste
7.2.2.1 Collection of Chitinous waste The shrimp shell wastes and prawn shells were collected from fish market, Lucknow,
India. These wastes were washed with tap water repeatedly, dried in room temperature and
crushed it for further experiments. Colloidal chitin was prepared from the chitin by the
modified method of Hsu and Lockwood, 1975. Chitin powdered was purchased from Hi
Media.
7.2.2.2 Pre-treatment of Shrimp Waste
A total of four pre-treatment methods and one control (untreated) were carried out to
investigate the efficiency of pre-treated prawn waste in fermentation process. Pre-treatment
method is described in Appendix 6.
7.2.3Production of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine
7.2.3.1 Production of GlcNAc from bacterial degradation of different source of chitin
For the production of GlcNAc, both Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas punctata
were grown in a production media inoculated with 1% of different chitin source in shaking
condition at 37ºC for 5 days and after every 24 hrs culture broth was centrifuged at 10,000
rpm for 20 min at 4ºC and the resultant supernatant was tested for estimation of NAG using
standard curve with N-acetyl-glucosamine as a standard.
CHAPTER VII Page 132
7.2.4 Experimental Design
The research was divided into two main parts, screening for the best pre-treatment of
prawn waste and optimization of chitinase production and NAG using pre-treatment prawn
waste. The first stage involved pre-treatment of prawn waste and inoculums preparation.
Fermentation process would be done to investigate the efficiency of each pre-treatment
method used. The pre-treatment which yield the highest degradation rate and chitinase
production was selected for further optimization study.
Chitin source stock culture of bacteria
Pretreatment culture on nutrient agar
Method
1. Chitin Colloidal treatment Production media preparation
2. Chitin (Hi-Media)
Prawn shells
• Colloidal treatment • Acid-base treatment • Oven dry • Boiling and crushing
Incubate up to 5days, centrifuge, and collect supernatnant
Test for NAG production, enzyme activity, protein estimation
CHAPTER VII Page 133
7.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
7.3.1 Antifungal activity crude enzyme from Aeromonas hydrophila HS4
Chitinolytic enzymes are able to lyse the cell wall of many fungi. The microorganisms
that produce these chitinolytic enzymes are capable of eradicating fungal diseases that are a
problem for global agricultural production. Chitinase showed stronger inhibitory activity
(47.33%) towards potent phytopathogen, Shizophyllum commune in comparsion of control
(Fig 7.1). The purified chitinase from Aeromonas hydrophila HS4 was tested for antifungal
activity by their ability to inhibit hyphal extension growth of Shizophyllum commune.
A B
D C
Fig 7.1: Radial growth of Shizophyllum commune on PDA plate amended with culture filtrate of Aeromonas hydrophila in various concentration (A) 30% (B) 20% (C) 10% (D) Control
CHAPTER VII Page 134
Myc
elia
l Gro
wth
(cm
s)
7.3.1.2 Radial growth suppression by extracellular antifungal protein by
Aeromonas hydrophila HS4 Crude
From Figure 7.2, radial growth on Shizophyllum commune on PDA plate was
inhibited at concentration of 10 % in comparison of control. The percentage of radial growth
inhibition by culture filtrate of Aeromonas hydrophila was 23.33 after 3day of incubation and
36.48 after 7day incubation (Fig 7.2). The potential of antifungal activity increased when the
culture filtrate was increases from 10% to 30% (Table 7.1).
10
9 Control
8 10%
7 20%
6
5 30%
4
3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (Days)
Fig 7.2: Graphical representation of radial growth inhibition of Shizophyllum commune by Aeromonas hydrophila HS4
7.3.2 Antifungal activity of crude enzyme from Aeromonas hydrophila HS6
on Shizophyllum commune Chitinolytic enzymes are able to lyse the cell wall of many fungi. The microorganisms
that produce these chitinolytic enzymes are capable of eradicating fungal diseases that are a
problem for global agricultural production. Chitinase showed stronger inhibitory activity
(61.79%) towards potent phytopathogen, Shizophyllum commune in comparsion of control
(Fig 7.3). The purified chitinase from Aeromonas punctata was tested for antifungal activity
by their ability to inhibit hyphal extension growth of Shizophyllum commune.
CHAPTER VII Page 135
7.3.2.2 Radial growth suppression by extracellular antifungal protein by
Aeromonas punctata HS6 Crude:
From Figure 7.4, radial growth on Shizophyllum commune on PDA plate was
inhibited at concentration of 10 % in comparsion of control. The percentage of radial growth
inhibition by culture filtrate of Aeromonas punctata was 26.82 after 3day of incubation and
38.2 after 7day incubation (Fig 7.4). The potential of antifungal activity increased when the
culture filtrate was increases from 10% to 30% (Table 7.1).
Control 10%
20% 30%
Fig 7.3: Radial growth of Shizophyllum commune on PDA plate amended with culture Filtrate of Aeromonas punctata in various concentrations
CHAPTER VII Page 136
Myc
elia
l gro
wth
(cm
s)
10
9 control 8 10% 7 20%
6 30%
5
4
3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (days)
Fig 7.4: Graphical representation of radial growth inhibition of Shizophyllum commune by Aeromonas punctata HS6
Table 7.1: The percentage of radial growth inhibition of Shizophyllum commune by
culture filtrate of Aeromonas hydrophila HS4 and Aeromonas punctata HS6 after 3 and 7
day
Concentration of culture filtrate (V/V)
% Radial growth inhibition
HS4 HS6
3 day 7 day 3 day 7 day
10% 23.33 36.48 26.82 38.2
20% 33 42.03 36.58 45.05
30% 47.33 47.59 46.34 61.79
7.3.3 Standard curve of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc)
The standard curve of GlcNAc was constructed using standard solution of GlcNAc at
concentration of .02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.12, 0.14, 0.16 mg/ml (Fig 7.5). The 2ml of
potassium ferricyanide solution was added into 1.5ml of standard GlcNAc at various
concentrations. The mixture was mixed and incubated in boiling water for 15min. The color
development was measured for the absorbance at wavelength of 420nm using D.W as a
CHAPTER VII Page 137
O.D
(420
nm)
blank. A regression line was drowning between GlcNAc concentrations against their
absorbance value at 420nm.
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
y = 4.670x + 0.083 R² = 0.990
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16
Conc. of NAG (mg/ml)
Fig 7.5: Standard curve for estimation of N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine
7.3.4 Standard curve of Protein estimation
The standard curve of protein was constructed using standard solution of BSA at
concentration of 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180µg/ml (Fig 7.6). The color
development was measured for the absorbance at wavelength of 660nm using D.W as a
blank. A regression line was drowning between BSA concentrations against their absorbance
value at 660nm.
Fig 7.6: Standard curve for the estimation of protein
CHAPTER VII Page 138
7.3.5 Production of N-acetyl-D-Glucosamine
7.3.5.1 Production of N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine by the degradation of Biowaste from
Aeromonas hydrophila HS4
Prawn shells, fish shells was collected from the local fish market and used for the
production of NAG (Fig 7.7). Production was compared by using chitin and colloidal chitin
as control. From the result it is conformed that GlcNAc production was maximum to
colloidal chitin (0.257 mg/ml), but within biowaste prawn shells (0.2486 mg/ml) is best
substrate as compared to fish shell (0.233 mg/ml) with 89.40 U/ml enzyme activity (Table
7.2). So it can be used for the production of GlcNAc and is best way to degrade the fishery
waste and reduce environmental hazard. In previous studies N-acetyl D glucosamine
produced by the degradation of prawn shells waste and fungal biomass by the application of
partially purified chitinase from Trichoderma harzianum (Das et al., 2012).
Table 7.2: Production of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine by the degradation of biowaste
Period (days) GlcNAc (mg/ml)
Total activity (U/ml)
Total protein (µg/ml)
Specific Activity (U/mg protein)
PRAWN SHELLS 1 0.1273 80.13 2184.15 0.0366 2 0.1438 80.41 2594.47 0.0309 3 0.2486 89.40 2316.5 0.0385 4 0.1987 89.03 894 0.0995 5 0.1772 80.64 205 0.393 FISH SHELLS 1 0.2373 83.86 3053.25 0.0274 2 0.233 84.20 2835.12 0.0296 3 0.2233 84.43 2401.725 0.0351 4 0.155 83.60 1376.4 0.0607 5 0.126 72.52 1351.5 0.0536 CHITIN (HI-Media) 1 0.2552 72 1858.95 0.038 2 0.2439 80.89 1726.5 0.0468 3 0.206 84.97 1666 0.0510 4 0.201 73.34 917.5 0.0799 5 0.119 68.24 507.3 0.134 COLLODIAL CHITIN 1 0.257 69.37 1979.55 0.035 2 0.2392 73.37 2063.52 0.0355 3 0.2158 87.68 1569.22 0.0558 4 0.155 77.71 882.17 0.088
5 0.119 61.88 367 0.168
CHAPTER VII Page 139
O.D
(420
nm)
0.3
0.25
Prawn shells Fish shells
colloidal chitin chitin shells
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0 1 2 3 4 5
Time (days)
Fig 7.7: Screening of substrate for N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine by Aeromonas hydrophila
HS4
7.3.5.1.1 Screening for Suitable Pre-treatment Method for NAG production by
degradation of prawn shell by Aeromonas hydrophila HS4
The best substrate for the production of NAG by the degradation of pre-treated prawn
shells was observed that NAG production was maximum with colloidal treatment of prawn
shells (0.266 mg/ml) after third day of incubation for Aeromonas hydrophila, as indicated in
Table 7.3. This was then followed by colloidal chitin, Boiling and crushing, prawn oven dry
treatment, acid base treatment on the production of NAG (Fig 7.8).
Table 7.3: Effect of treatment on production of chitinase and NAG by using Aeromonas
hydrophila HS4
Period (days) GlcNAc (mg/ml)
Total activity (U/ml)
Total protein (µg/ml)
Specific Activity (U/mg protein)
PRAWN SHELLS (Oven dry/ PS)
1 0.1273 80.13 2184.15 0.0366 2 0.1438 80.41 2594.47 0.0309 3 0.233 89.40 2316.5 0.0385 4 0.1987 89.03 894 0.0995
CHAPTER VII Page 140
NAG
(mg/
ml)
5 0.1772 80.64 205 0.393 PRAWN SHELLS (colloidal treatment/ COP)
1 0.196 81.2 2345.12 0.0346 2 0.224 86.81 2632.1 0.0329 3 0.266 84.44 2567.11 0.0328 4 0.254 82.1 1309 0.0627 5 0.207 70 609 0.114 PRAWN SHELLS (Acid base treatment/ CP) 1 0.145 76.34 1987.56 0.0384 2 0.197 82.11 2234.12 0.0367 3 0.2074 70.12 2376.34 0.0295 4 0.187 69.11 987 0.0700 5 0.145 60.14 789 0.0762 PRAWN SHELLS (Boiling and Crushing/ BC) 1 0.2552 72 1858.95 0.038 2 0.2439 80.89 1726.5 0.0468 3 0.206 84.97 1666 0.0510 4 0.201 73.34 917.5 0.0799 5 0.119 68.24 507.3 0.134 COLLODIAL CHITIN (CC) 1 0.257 69.37 1979.55 0.035 2 0.2392 73.37 2063.52 0.0355 3 0.2158 87.68 1569.22 0.0558 4 0.155 77.71 882.17 0.088 5 0.119 61.88 367 0.168
0.3
PS COP CP BP CC
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5 Day of incubation
Fig 7.8: Effect of different treatment of prawn shells on NAG production by Aeromonas
hydrophila HS4
CHAPTER VII Page 141
7.3.5.2 Production of N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine by the degradation of Boiwaste from
Aeromonas punctata HS6
Screening of best substrate for the production of N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine by the
degradation of biowaste was observed that colloidal chitin (0.257mg/ml) is the best substrate,
Among biowaste prawn shell and fish shell, prawn shell (0.254 mg/ml) enhanced the
production of N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine after third day of incubation (Table 7.4, Fig 7.9).
Table 7.4: Production of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine by the degradation of biowaste
Period (days) GlcNAc (mg/ml) Total activity
(U/ml) Total protein
(µg/ml) Specific Activity
(U/mg)
PRAWN SHELLS 1 0.244 89.16 4765.5 0.0187 2 0.248 93.86 4850.5 0.0189 3 0.254 79.56 1979.55 0.0401 4 0.238 69.41 1232.2 0.0563 5 0.222 60.51 1176.1 0.0514
FISH SHELLS 1 0.25 91.22 3028.47 0.03078 2 0.246 89.26 3473.4 0.0256
3 0.252 78.51 3838.5 0.0204 4 0.242 70.12 2899 0.0241 5 0.252 60.45 2655.95 0.0227
CHITIN (Hi-Media) 1 0..236 92.48 1954.72 0.0473 2 0.2528 87.45 1255.85 0.0696 3 0.248 80.54 1232.2 0.0653 4 0.244 74.19 1146.75 0.0646 5 0.238 65.11 1020.5 0.0638
COLLOIDAL CHITIN 1 0.244 92.98 3584.25 0.02594 2 0.257 84.43 2367.4 0.0356 3 0.25 81.83 2317.75 0.0353 4 0.2446 81.72 1788 0.0457 5 0.2368 72.11 1040.6 0.0692
CHAPTER VII Page 142
O.D
(420
nm)
0.26
Prawn shells Fish shells chitin colloidal chitin
0.25
0.24
0.23
0.22
0.21
0.2
1 2 3 4 5
Time (days)
Fig 7.9: Screening of substrate for N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine by Aeromonas punctata
HS6
7.3.5.2.1 Screening for Suitable Pre-treatment Method for NAG production by
degradation of prawn shell by Aeromonas punctata HS6
The best substrate for the production of NAG by the degradation of pre treated prawn
shells with Aeromonas punctata was observed that NAG production was maximum with
colloidal treatment of prawn shells (0.28 mg/ml) after third day of incubation, as indicated in
Table 7.5. This was then followed by colloidal chitin, boiling and crushing, prawn oven dry
treatment, acid base treatment on the production of NAG (Fig 7.10).
Table 7.5: Effect of treatment on production of chitinase and NAG by using Aeromonas
punctata HS6
Period (hrs) GlcNAc
(mg/ml)
Total activity
(U/ml)
Total protein
(µg/ml)
Specific
Activity (U/mg
protein)
PRAWN SHELLS (Oven dry/ PS)
1 0.244 89.16 4765.5 0.0187
2 0.248 93.86 4850.5 0.0189
3 0.254 79.56 1979.55 0.0401
4 0.238 69.41 1232.2 0.0563
CHAPTER VII Page 143
5 0.222 60.51 1176.1 0.0514
PRAWN SHELLS (colloidal treatment/ COP) 1 0.15 74.67 4679 0.0159
2 0.32 80.23 5467.4 0.0146
3 0.28 86.34 1678.12 0.057
4 0.108 80.99 987 0.082
5 0.096 76.11 877 0.0867
PRAWN SHELLS (Acid-base treatment/CP)
1 0.146 56.12 1267 o.o44
2 0.186 64.13 3467.1 0.0184
3 0.25 72.33 4234.1 0.017
4 0.199 67.8 3216.6 0.0210
5 0.185 54.44 2467.1 0.022
PRAWN SHELLS (Bioling and Crushing/ BP)
1 0.236 92.48 1954.72 0.0473
2 0.2528 87.45 1255.85 0.0696
3 0.248 80.54 1232.2 0.0653
4 0.244 74.19 1146.75 0.0646
5 0.238 65.11 1020.5 0.0638
COLLOIDAL CHITIN (CC)
1 0.244 92.98 3584.25 0.02594
2 0.257 84.43 2367.4 0.0356
3 0.25 81.83 2317.75 0.0353
4 0.2446 81.72 1788 0.0457
5 0.2368 72.11 1040.6 0.0692
CHAPTER VII Page 144
NAG
(µg/
ml)
0.35
0.3
PS COP CP BP CC
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5
Time of incubation (days)
Fig 7.10: Effect of different treatment of prawn on NAG production by Aeromonas
punctata HS6 7.4. CONCLUSIONS
Protection of plants from disease produced by phytopathogenic fungi is one of the
most important challenges in agriculture. The total losses as results of plant diseases reach
almost 50% of the crop in developing countries. One–third of this is a consequence of fungal
infections. Therefore finding biological products that could be used for biological fighting is
very important in agriculture. Recent studies demonstrated that chitinase from plants and
microorganisms are able to inhibit the fungal growth.
In this study, a native chitinase with antifungal activity against a wide range of
phytopathogens was isolated from Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas punctata, which is
important since not all Chitinases have antifungal activity. Furthermore, isolated chitinase in
this study may have important implications.
Chitinase plays an important role in the decomposition of chitin and potentially in the
utilization of chitin as a renewable resource. The result concluded that HS4 and HS6 are
mesophilic bacterial strain that have ability to produced huge amount of chitinase in short
cultivation time. The utilization of different chitin substrate by HS4 and HS6 for growth and
production of enzyme and treatment of prawn-shells on production of chitinase and NAG was
investigated. This study highlights the possibility of using HS4 and HS6 to deal with agro-
CHAPTER VII Page 145
industrial wastes to produce NAG. It was concluded that out of all the four different substrate
investigated, Prawn shell was found to be the most suitable substrate for NAG by both HS4
and HS6.
The strains has proved to be a valuable enzyme source for selective production of
NAG which has generated interest as a new functional material with high potential uses in
various pharmaceutical and medical fields. So it may be concluded that colloidal treatment is
the best treatment for HS4 and HS6 for NAG production.
Moreover, these strains are particularly interesting because of;
(1) The large quantities and variety of extracellular metabolites it produces
(2) The possibility of controlling its growth conditions using a variety of substrates for
production of enzymes,
(3) Having unique properties likewise antimicrobial, bioflocculant or even amino-sugar
(NAG) production that have great importance in medical and pharmaceutical fields.
These bacterial strains have adopted special metabolic pathways to survive in extreme
conditions and so has better capacity to produce special bioactive compounds.
Significance of the study
The study showed that soil from rhizosphere is the best source for chitinase producing microorganisms.
Aeromonas hydrophila HS4 and Aeromonas punctata HS6 are novel bacterial strains that have ability to produce large amount of chitinase in short time.
This study highlights the possibility of using Aeromonas hydrophila HS4 and Aeromonas punctata HS6 to deal with agro-industrial wastes to produce chitinase and NAG.
Prawn shell was found to be the most suitable substrate for chitinase production by both
the strains. Thus, it is an important element in utilizing prawn shell waste that not only to
solve environmental problems but also decreases the production cost of microbial
chitinases.
Both strains of Aeromonas sp. have the ability to produce chitinase between temperature
22 and 40 °C which is the field temperature for the cultivation of most of the crops in
India. So it may be applied to field condition against plant pathogens that are the major
problem for agricultural food production.
CHAPTER VII Page 146
Chitinase from Aeromonas hydrophila HS4 showed pH optima and stability in alkaline
range that has great potential in biological pest control because the peritrophic gut lining
of insects is chitinous and has an alkaline pH.
Chitinase from Aeromonas punctata HS6 showed pH optima in acidic range (pH 5) that could be exploited for control of fungal plant pathogens.
The strains have proved to be a valuable enzyme source with high potential in various
pharmaceutical and medical fields. Also, due to their antifungal properties, as proved by
suppressing growth of Shizophyllum commune; these strains may be used as biocontrol
agents.
CHAPTER VII Page 147