characteristics of gps ztd products jan douša...distributions of nrt ztd × pp ztd, @gop different...
TRANSCRIPT
Jan DouJan DoušašaEUREF Analysis Centre WorkshopEUREF Analysis Centre Workshop
MarchMarch 15-1615-16, 200, 20066
Characteristics of Characteristics of GPS ZTD productsGPS ZTD products
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 2
OutlineOutline
ZTD and PWV productsZTD and PWV products evaluation
Stragegy changesStragegy changes evaluation
Hr Hr ×× DoY plots DoY plots GPS constellation effect solution characteristics ZTD differences (NRT products, IGS & EUR products)
Spectral analysisSpectral analysis ZTD differences
SummarySummary
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 3
ZTD/PWV products usedZTD/PWV products used
Zenith total delay (ZTD)Zenith total delay (ZTD) NRT GPS products: COST-716/TOUGH: NRT GPS products: COST-716/TOUGH:
(ASI,ACRI,BKG,GFZ,GOP,IEEC,LPT,NKG,NKGS)(ASI,ACRI,BKG,GFZ,GOP,IEEC,LPT,NKG,NKGS) PP GPS products: GOP, EUR@BKG, IGS@JPLPP GPS products: GOP, EUR@BKG, IGS@JPL ZTD from numerical weather model HIRLAM@DMIZTD from numerical weather model HIRLAM@DMI
Precipitable Water Vapor (PWV)Precipitable Water Vapor (PWV) PWV converted at KNMI from COST-716/TOUGH ACs’ PWV converted at KNMI from COST-716/TOUGH ACs’
ZTDZTD PWV calculated at GOP from radiosonde profiles provided PWV calculated at GOP from radiosonde profiles provided
by British Atmospheric Data Centreby British Atmospheric Data Centre PWV calculated at University of WyomingPWV calculated at University of Wyoming
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 4
ZTD comparisonsZTD comparisons2001-2003 comparison2001-2003 comparisonNRT x post-processingNRT x post-processing
1/4 of 2005 comparison1/4 of 2005 comparisonold NRT x new NRTold NRT x new NRT
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 5
- radiosondes from British Atmospheric Data centre (reduced profiles)- PWV converted from GPS by KNMI (the Netherlands)- ! often strong seasonal variation in the systematic error (1-3mm) !! often strong seasonal variation in the systematic error (1-3mm) !
directly collocated sitesdirectly collocated sites remote comparisonremote comparison
PWV evaluation – GPS PWV evaluation – GPS ×× radiosondes radiosondes
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 6
- UW = PWV produced by University of Wyoming- GOP/BADC = PWV produced by GOP using data from BADC (reduced profiles)- approx 0.5mm PWV systematic error in the values- full profiles from UW, but cutted to the attitude of GPS from GOP/BADC
GPS-Raobs height diff = +247m
GPS-Raobs height diff = +475m
GPS-Raobs height diff = 0m
GPS-Raobs height diff = 0m
PWV comparison – UW PWV comparison – UW ×× GOP/BADC radobs GOP/BADC radobs
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 7
ZTD ZTD differencesdifferences – NRT GOP – NRT GOP ×× HIRLAM (NWP)HIRLAM (NWP)
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 8
- weekly Sdev and Bias- GPS ZTD from GOP near real-time - NWM Hirlam from DMI
also seasonal variation in offset
ZTD comparison – NRT GOP ZTD comparison – NRT GOP ×× HIRLAM (NWP) HIRLAM (NWP)
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 9
- GPS ZTD from GOP near real-time - NWM HIRLAM from DMI! based on 2,5 years of comparison !
daily variation (6-hour periods ?)coincides with HIRLAM update cycle
Bias
Std.dev.
ZTD ZTD ’hourly’ ’hourly’ comparison comparison GPS GPS ×× HIRLAM (NWP) HIRLAM (NWP)
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 10
• While switching from Bernese V4.2 to Bernese V5.0, in May 2005 we have created completely new system for routine analysis uniquely implemented for NRT and post-processing analysis
• Solution is clustered at most of the processing steps (80 stations takes 20min in NRT on standard PC)
• Improved NRT coordinate estimation (stacking over last 28 days using two-hour solutions/NEQs)
• Ambiguity resolved in 2-hourly sessions – used in CRD estimation
• Ambiguity fixed solution provided as an alternative ZTD product
• New troposphere modelling (piece-wise linear, continuous) using a priori ZTD with hNMF and corrected with wNMF.
From BSW 4.2 to BSW 5.0From BSW 4.2 to BSW 5.0
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 11
BSW 4.2 and BSW 5.0 tropospheric modelBSW 4.2 and BSW 5.0 tropospheric model
time&site variable new tropospheric model to the old one 0-5mmtime&site variable new tropospheric model to the old one 0-5mm
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 12
hour-to-hour coordinate repeatabilities improved from 10/25/25 10/25/25 mmmm to 6/6/16 mm6/6/16 mm (North/East/Up) by ambiguity resolving
Coordinate repeatability in NRTCoordinate repeatability in NRT(amb-free (amb-free ×× ambig-fix solution) ambig-fix solution)
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 13
DDistributionistributionss of of NRT NRT ZTD ZTD ×× PP ZTD, @GOP PP ZTD, @GOPDifferent variants of the processing: 1) BSW 4.2 (2001-2003)
2) BSW 5.0 (2004) ambiguity free3) BSW 5.0 (2004) ambiguity fix
BOR1 GOPE POTS
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 14
DDistributionistributionss of of NRT NRT ZTD ZTD ×× PP ZTD, @GOP PP ZTD, @GOPDifferent variants of the processing: 1) BSW 4.2 (2001-2003)
2) BSW 5.0 (2004) ambiguity freestations at boundary areasstations at boundary areas 3) BSW 5.0 (2004) ambiguity fix
BUCU MATE CAGL
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 15
DDistributionistributionss of of NRT NRT ZTDZTD@GOP@GOP ×× HIRLAMHIRLAMDifferent variants of the processing: 1) BSW 4.2 (2001-2003)
2) BSW 5.0 (2004) ambiguity free x-scale 2,5x x-scale 2,5x smallsmaller er !! 3) BSW 5.0 (2004) ambiguity fix
BOR1 GOPE POTS
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 16
DDistributionistributionss of of NRT NRT ZTDZTD@GOP@GOP ×× HIRLAMHIRLAMDifferent variants of the processing: 1) BSW 4.2 (2001-2003)
2) BSW 5.0 (2004) ambiguity free x-scale 2,5x x-scale 2,5x smallesmaller r !! 3) BSW 5.0 (2004) ambiguity fix
BUCU MATE CAGL
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 17
DDistributionistributionss of of ACs’ ACs’ NRT NRT ZTD ZTD ×× PP@GOP PP@GOP
ACRI ASI BKG GFZ GOP IEEC LPT NKG NKGSBOR1
GOPE
HERS
POTS
WTZR
ONSA
MAR6
CAGL
MATE
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 18
HR x DoY visualizationHR x DoY visualization # Sites
# Satellites
# Observations
aposteriori RMS
TEC
Prec. Water Vapor
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 19
ZTD differences: old-NRT@GOP ZTD differences: old-NRT@GOP ×× PP@GOP PP@GOP
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 20
ZTD differences: new-NRT@GOP ZTD differences: new-NRT@GOP ×× PP@IGS(PPP) PP@IGS(PPP) ambiguity freeambiguity free
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 21
ZTD differences: new-NRT@GOP ZTD differences: new-NRT@GOP ×× PP@IGS(PPP) PP@IGS(PPP) ambiguity fixambiguity fix
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 22
NRT NRT ×× PP (GPS) - hourly PP (GPS) - hourly ×× doy plots (various ACs) doy plots (various ACs)
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 23
NGK
LPT
ACRI
ASI
BKG
GOPE
IEEC
NKGS
GFZ
ACs’ ZTD differencesw.r.t. GOP PostProc(precise DD solution)
1. strong signal on repeating the GPS
constellation
2. visible signal on repeatingthe satellites‘
visibility at site
Spectral analysisSpectral analysisdifferent ACdifferent AC’s’s
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 24
MALL
MATE
CAGL
HERS
ONSA
POTS
GOPE
BOR1
GOP ZTD differencesw.r.t. GOP PostProc(precise DD solution)
sites at networkboundaries: MALL,MATE, CAGL, HERSare more affected
PSDs are shiftedPSDs are shifted !!
Spectral analysisSpectral analysisdifferent sites at GOPdifferent sites at GOP
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 25
ZTD comparison: PPP@IGS ZTD comparison: PPP@IGS ×× PP@GOP PP@GOP
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 26
ZTD comparison: EUR@BKG ZTD comparison: EUR@BKG ×× PP@GOPPP@GOP
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 27
IGSPPP and EURBKGZTD differences
w.r.t. GOP PostProc(precise DD solution)
BKGEUR is stronglyaffected
compared to PPPIGS
PSDs are shiftedPSDs are shifted !!
Spectral analysisSpectral analysisIGS / EUR productsIGS / EUR products
HERS EUR
MATE EUR
VIS0 EUR
POTS EUR
HERS IGS
MATE IGS
VIS0 IGS
POTS IGS
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 28
Widely used troposphere model in BSW 4.2 (no apriori ZTD and hNMF for estimates) overestimated ZTD’s wet component
New troposphere model in BSW 5.0 (a priori ZTD with hNMF and estimates with wNMF) provides better agreement with the radiosondes and numerical weather models and is about 1-5mm lower with respect to the old model
Second order ionospere effect possibly detected in a posteriori RMS of the hourly solutions
Ambiguity resolution shows some systematic error in ZTD (?) PPP and DD approach are more or less equal when used correctly GPS useful for the numerical weather model monitoring, radiosonde
calibrations (monitoring the seasonal signal ...)
SummarySummary
EUREF AC Workshop, March 15-16, 2006, Padua, Italy 29
ZTD in NRT could be estimated with internal accuracy of 3-6mm and syst. error of ±1-2mm (results depends on site location and season)
ZTD evaluated by Hirlam NWM resulted in std. deviation of 8-16mm and seasonally variable positive bias up to 15mm
PWVs from GPS were compared to radiosondes (two sources) with standard deviation of 1-2mm PWV and bias of 0-2mm also seasonally variable
Though using final orbit products, the EUREF ZTD product is not of a good quality (mixing strategies etc) and is suitable neither in application for climatology, nor in evaluation of other ZTD products (NRT..).
SummarySummary (continued) (continued)