characterization and management of sodic soils and desutter_ndwrri_… · australasia 17.4 340.0...

22
Yangbo He Soil Science Department Sodic soil characterization and management on subsurface drainage Yangbo “Kathy” He and Tom DeSutter Soil Science Department WRRI Fellowship Research Presentations 7 February 2013

Upload: others

Post on 18-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Yangbo He Soil Science Department

Sodic soil characterization and management on subsurface drainage

Yangbo “Kathy” He and Tom DeSutter Soil Science Department

WRRI Fellowship Research Presentations

7 February 2013

Page 2: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Sodic soils definition and distribution Table 1. Global distribution of salt affected soils (Szabolcs, 1989). Continent Areas in millions of ha

Saline† Sodic (Alkali)‡ Total

North America 6.2 9.6 15.8 Central America 2.0 — 2.0 South America 69.4 59.6 129.0 Africa 53.5 27.0 80.5 South Asia 83.3 1.8 85.1 North & Central Asia 91.6 120.1 211.7 Southeast Asia 20.0 — 20.0 Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2

Type ECe ESP SARe pH

Saline >4 <15 <12 <8.5

Sodic <4 >15 >12 >8.5

Salt affected soils (NRCS)

Biscuit top Btn

A E

Btn

Btnz

Btknz

Bkz Bk

C

Exline, Fine, smectitic, frigid Leptic Natrudolls

E

Btn1

Btn2

Bg1

Bg2

Cg

Ryan, Fine, smectitic, frigid Typic Natraquerts

Photo by M. Ulmer Photo by Y. He

Page 3: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Sodic soils • 4.7 million acres of sodic soil in ND • Many sodic soils are under CRP or

rangeland • Increase in commodity prices has allowed

for the conversion of CRP to crop production

Presenter
Presentation Notes
For example, corn prices jumped from $3.0 in the 2006 market year to >$7.0 now in market year. Although prices have subsequently moderated, the factors underlying the increase have not disappeared. The opportunity costs of retiring cropland are likely to remain high, which could dampen landowner willingness to enroll in the CRP’s general signup (SWCS, 2008)
Page 4: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Productivity index of sodic soils (depends on the county where the soil is located)

Highly sodic soils PI Medium PI Productive soils PI

Exline 30 Bearden-saline 54 Fargo 86

Stirium 22 Antler-saline 52 Glyndon 93

Ryan 42 Gardena 94

Ojata 24

Presenter
Presentation Notes
In theory, you lose 70% of your yield when affected by sodic compared to normal range of soils. Crop productivity index ratings provide a relative ranking of soils based on their potential for intensive crop production. An index can be used to rate the potential yield of one soil against that of another over a period of time. Ratings range from 0 to 100. The higher numbers indicate higher production potential. The rating is not crop specific.��When the soils are rated, the following assumptions are made: a) adequate management, b) natural weather conditions (no irrigation), c) artificial drainage where required, d) no frequent flooding on the lower lying soils, and e) no land leveling or terracing. Even though predicted average yields will change with time, the productivity indices are expected to remain relatively constant in relation to one another over time.
Page 5: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

“normal” soil flocculation Ca2+

Mg2+ NH4

+ K+

Ca2+

Mg2+ NH4

+ K+

Na+

Na+ Na+

Na+

How Na+ cause soil structure problems?

But with excess Na+ and low EC, there is dispersion

Page 6: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Na+ cause adverse effects on soil structure

Flocculation occurs when the monovalent cations (i.e. Na+) is replaced by divalent cations (Ca2+) and “clumping” of soil particles occurs. Dispersion: soil is separated into individual particles (opposite of flocculation)

http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/objtwr/imported_images/fn_386_figure2.jpg

Page 7: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Mechanism of Na+ adverse effects

• Guoy-Chapman theory

(Essington, 2004)

( )IZ

k10

1 10042.3 −− =

If the double layer is small, no dispersion

At low EC, thickness of double layer is large, Double layers of adjacent particles will overlap, causing electrostatic repulsion

Effect of ionic strength (I)

Effect of ion charge (Z)

Ca Na

From Essington, 2004

Presenter
Presentation Notes
P=RT(nc-2n0) P=swelling pressure; nc = conc. in median plan between neighboring micelles, n0 = conc. in external solution When Ca is dominat, the diffuse double layer thickness is small, no dispersion, when Na is dominant, the diffuse double layer thickness is big, the diffuse double layer from adjacent particles will overlap and repell each other, causing dispersion.
Page 8: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Water Management

• Tile drainage is an effective water management tool

• Drainage performance may decrease – Soil chemistry change – Being placed in or below a zone of sodic subsoils

• Cost is expensive ($400-800/acre; average charge of $576/acre (Aakre)

Page 9: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Data collected and summarized by David Franzen, NDSU, February 2013

Page 10: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :
Page 11: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Potential impact from drainage

A

E

Btn

H2 O

Flow

GW

A

E

Btn

Drainage tile

H2 O

Flow

After 6 h

Start

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Bowl, how I did that: this is a quick demonstration. This bowl has a piece of sodic soil and treated by DI water
Page 12: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Management

A

E

Btn

Drainage tile

EC decrease H2 O

Flow

Drainage tile

Gypsum application

NG G

A

E

Btn

Ca

Ca2+ & EC

Na+

Page 13: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

What to do?

• Currently no management guidelines for draining or remediating sodic or saline/sodic soils.

• Most sodic soil work is done dryland or irrigated soils, not tile-drained soils.

• Principle theories are the same but the management may be different.

Page 14: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Soil Management • Complicated…

– gypsum, spent lime, reactive area, application rate, soil chemical properties, location of sodic zone, subsurface vs surface drainage, gravitational water vs capillary water…

– Cost of gypsum is about $200/ton; sugarbeet spent lime is “free”

– Potential agricultural use of flue gas desulfurization gypsum in ND

– The application rate is now based on local experience and financial consideration

– No proper rates have been determined for ND soils

Page 15: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

• Objectives Determine effects of gypsum or spent

lime on sodic soil reclamation or soil “maintenance”

Investigate gypsum or spent lime dissolution/precipitation, Ca and exchangeable Na on exchange phase

Develop proper rates for application based on different soil series and characteristics

Page 16: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Field sampling and soil characterization

• Soil series Sodium-affected soils:

Ryan, Stirum, Exline, Ojata Potentially sodium-affected subsoils:

Antler-saline, Bearden-saline, Colvin Very productive soils:

Fargo, Glyndon, Gardena

3 reps/series (the same delineation) 0-6’’, 6-12’’, 12-24’’,and 24-36’’.

• Sampling

Page 17: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :
Page 18: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Laboratory sodic soil characterization

• Measurement – Ksat, pore volumes of water – Dispersion (Panayiotopoulos et al., 2004),

– Swelling (Curtin et al., 1994) – Exchange reactions – Mineralogy of clays

Materials and Methods

Page 19: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Current Gypsum Recommendations

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Explain how these eq are different from lime ones; explain more why the Eq are not routine
Page 20: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

• Detailed chemical characterization are

necessary before gypsum or spent lime (Ca2+), and drainage management

• Regional specific Ca-amendment application

requirements will be developed for both sodic and non sodic soils.

Summary

Page 21: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :
Page 22: Characterization and management of sodic soils and DeSutter_NDWRRI_… · Australasia 17.4 340.0 357.4 Europe 7.8 22.9 30.7 Total 351.5 581.0 932.2 Type . ECe : ESP : SARe . pH :

Acknowledgements: Partial funding provided by NDWRRI and by NRCS CIG

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cavour,Miranda, Totten, Stirum, Aberdeen, Rhoades Dogtooth, Nahon Ryan, Cresbard (just a few!)