characterization of botrytis cinerea resistance to ...... · fungicide resistance frequency was...
TRANSCRIPT
CHARACTERIZATION OF BOTRYTIS CINEREA RESISTANCE TO FUNGICIDES IN CALIFORNIA
STRAWBERRIES
SCOTT COSSEBOOM
Outline
■ Introduction
■ Fungicide resistance screening
■ Fungicide use survey
■ Species Identification
■ Field Trial
Recent research
Maybe show life cycleShow where strawberries are
grownSeason in California
Fight The
Resistance
When strawberries are
grownThe biology of Botrytis Cultural management
Chemical management Fungicide resistance Resistance management
Where strawberries are
grown1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
Northern District
Central District
Southern District
Three districts grow 95% of strawberry fruit in CA
Strawberry production
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Pro
du
ctio
n (
mill
ion
s o
f tr
ays)
Month
Northern district Central districtSouthern district
California production regions
Adapted from: Agrios 2005
Life cycle of Botrytis
Maybe show life cycleShow where strawberries are
grownSeason in California
Cultural management
▪ Most effective method when weather is favorable for the pathogen
▪ Multiple applications are made per season
▪ Three types: Site-specific, multi-site, biological
Chemical management
Photo: G. Holmes
Fungicide resistance
Adapted from: Deisling, H. B. et al. 2008.
sensitive individual
resistant individual
fungicide application
regeneration
Resistance management
■ Rotate modes of action
■ Tank-mix
■ Use fungicides less
Eastern U.S.
▪ High levels of resistance to important fungicides for Botrytis gray mold control in
strawberries
▪ Resistance changing over time
▪ Isolates resistant to multiple modes of action
California
▪ Resistance reported to frequently used fungicides
▪ Resistance increasing in a population within a season
Previous research
FUNGICIDE RESISTANCE SCREENING
• 47 fields
• 888 isolates collected
• 2 sampling times
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Pro
du
ctio
n (
mill
ion
s o
f tr
ays)
Early-season sampling Late-season sampling
Northern district Central districtSouthern district
active ingredient was not tested in this study
Table. Fungicides labeled for Botrytis gray mold of strawberry in California
Example trade name Active ingredient(s) FRAC code(s)
Topsin Thiophanate-methyl 1
Rovral Iprodione 2
Fontelis Penthiopyrad 7
Kenja 400 Isofetamid 7
Luna Sensation Fluopyram Trifloxystrobin 7 11
Luna Tranquility Fluopyram Pyrimethanil 7 9
Pristine Boscalid Pyraclostrobin 7 11
Merivon Fluxapyroxad Pyraclostrobin 7 11
Scala Pyrimethanil 9
Switch Cyprodinil Fludioxonil 9 12
Elevate Fenhexamid 17
Ph-D Polyoxin-D 19
No fungicide
Cyprodinil
1 2 3 4 5 6
Iprodione
Fenhexamid
Fludioxonil
T-methyl
Boscalid
Fluopyram
Penthiopyrad
Isofetamid
Experimental 1
Experimental 2
Fernández-Ortuño, D. et al. 2014.
Boscalid
Fenhexamid
Fludioxonil
Control
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
T-methyl Iprodione Boscalid Penthiopyrad Isofetamid Fluopyram Cyprodinil Pyraclostrobin* Fludioxonil Fenhexamid
Fre
qu
ency
of
resi
sta
nce
(%
)
Active ingredient
FRAC code
California conventional Early-season (n=340)
Late-season (n= 362)
1 2 7 7 7 7 9 11 12 17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
T-methyl Iprodione Boscalid Penthiopyrad Isofetamid Fluopyram Cyprodinil Pyraclostrobin* Fludioxonil Fenhexamid
Fre
qu
ency
of
resi
sta
nce
(%
)
Active ingredient
FRAC code
California organic Early-season (n=92)
Late-season (n=94)
1 2 7 7 7 7 9 11 12 17
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Conventional Organic
Ave
rag
e C
CR
Production type
Early-season
Late-season
b
a
bc
c
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Fre
qu
en
cy o
f p
hen
oty
pe (
%)
Chemical class resistances
Early-season
Late-season
Chemical Class Gene Genotype observed
Hydroxyanilides ERG27 F196C, F412I, F412S
Dicarboximides Bos1 I356N, I365N, I365S
MBCs Beta-tubulin E198A
QoIs Cytochrome b G143A
SDHIs SDHb H272R, H272Y, N230I, P225F
Genetics behind resistance
Genotypes matched phenotypes 94%
FUNGICIDE USE SURVEY
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Captan
Pyraclostrobin
Cyprodinil
Fludioxonil
Boscalid
Fenhexamid
Pyrimethanil
Penthiopyrad
Sodium Tetraborohydrate Decahydrate
Fluxapyroxad
Polyoxin D
Extract of Neem Oil
Fluopyram
BLAD
Trifloxystrobin
Bacillus subtilis
Extract of Reynoutria Sachalinensis
Thiram
Streptomyces lydicus
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Thiophanate-methyl
Aureobasidium pullulans
Hydrogen dioxode
Peroxyacetic acid
Avg. no. applications per season
Ac
tive
in
gre
die
nt
▪ 15 applications per season
▪ 12 day interval
SPECIES IDENTIFICATION
FIELD TRIAL
Resistance testing1) non-amended control2) Endura (boscalid)3) Scholar (fludioxonil)4) Elevate (fenhexamid)
Week1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Sampling time (collection)
1 2 3 4 5
Fungicides applied weekly No fungicides applied
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Non-treated Fenhexamid Rotation Tank-mix + rotation
Fre
qu
ency
of
resi
stan
ce (
%)
Field treatment
Fenhexamid
I II III IV VTiming of isolate collection
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Non-treated Cyprodinil + fludioxonil Rotation Tank-mix + rotation
Fre
qu
ency
of
resi
stan
ce (
%)
Fungicide treatment
Fludioxonil
I II III IV V
Timing of isolate collection
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Non-treated Boscalid + pyraclostrobin Rotation Tank-mix + rotation
Fre
qu
ency
of
resi
stan
ce (
%)
Fungicide treatment
Boscalid
I II III IV V
Timing of isolate collection
Summary
■ 79 isolates were B. cinerea and one isolate was B. mali.
■ Fungicide resistance frequency was high to FRAC 1, 11, 17
– Low frequency of resistance to FRAC 12
– Moderate frequency of resistance to FRAC 2, 7, 9
■ Multi-fungicide resistant isolates were present in all three growing
districts. CCR3 was the most common. Few isolates were CCR0 or
CCR7.
■ There was an average of 15 applications per season.
– Captan, a multisite fungicide, was applied the most frequently
– Site-specific fungicides were applied less than twice per season
■ A within-season increase in CCR frequency was observed in
conventional fields.
Conclusions■ Botrytis cinerea is the primary causal agent of strawberry gray mold in California.
Other species may exist at low frequencies.
■ The frequency of resistant isolates in a population is a.i. dependent
– 73% statewide frequency of resistance to fenhexamid
– 2% statewide frequency of resistance to fludioxonil
– Fenhexamid was applied less (1.5 times per season) than fludioxonil (2.2)
■ The survey, the CCR shift, and the field trial all indicate that populations of
Botrytis may respond rapidly to a single application of a site-specific fungicide
– The survey: Site-specific fungicides applied < 3 times per season
– CCR shift: Within-season increase within conventional fields
– Field trial: Rapid increase in fenhexamid resistance frequency following
either one (rotation treatment) or three (fenhexamid treatment) exposures
to fenhexamid
■ The field trial indicated that after rapid selection for resistance, the population
may revert back to being sensitive if the selection pressure is removed (e.g.,
fenhexamid).