characterization of the catalytic domain of bovine adrenal tyrosine hydroxylase
TRANSCRIPT
Vol. 151, No. 3,1988
March 30,1988
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Pages 1446-1453
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CATALYTIC DOMAIN
OF BOVINE ADRENAL TYROSINE HYDROXYLASE
* 1 Smith # 2 Joh* Cory Abate ' , John A. ' , and Tong H. ,1,+
*Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology
Cornell University Medical College
Burke Rehabilitation Center
White Plains, New York
#Departments of Molecular Biology and Pathology
Massachusetts General Hospital
and Department of Pathology
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts
Received February 29, 1988
Mild trypsin proteolysis of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) produces a 34 kDa fragment which is catalytically active. To determine the structure of the trypsin-digested tyrosine hydroxylase (tTH) relative to the native enzyme and to regulatory phosphorylation sites, bovine adrenal tTH was purified to homogeneity and the sequence of 17 amino acids from the N- terminus was determined. These data indicate that the N-terminus of tTH corresponds to amino acid 158. Thus the catalytic region is contained within the central region of enzyme approximately 17 kDa from the N-terminal and 5 kDa from the C-terminal and does not include phosphorylation sites located in the N-terminus. This
1 Supported by NIMH grant, MH 24285.
2 Supported by a grant from Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, Federal Republic of Germany.
Abbreviations used were; TH, tyrosine hydroxylase; tTH, trypsin-digested tyrosine hydroxylase; PAIl, phenylalanine hydroxylase; TPH, tryptophan hydroxylase; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; DOPA, 3,4,-Dihydroxyphenylalanine.
+To whom correspondence should be addressed.
ooo6-291x/88 $1.5o Copyright © 1988 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. 1446
Vol. 151, No. 3, 1988 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
region of TH shares a high degree of homology with phenylalanine hydroxylase and tryptophan hydroxylase and thus reflects a selective conservation of regions required for catalysis in contrast to the non-homologous regulatory sites. Activation by proteolysis corresponds to an increase in affinity for both substrate and cofactor indicating that the region removed by proteolysis imposes additional constraints on substrate and cofactor binding. These data are consistent with the model that the catalytic core of TH is contained within a 34 kDa region in the highly conserved central portion of the molecule whereas the non-homologous N-terminus regulates cofactor binding and directs substrate specificity. ©198~Acad~icP ..... Inc.
Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (tyrosine 3-monooxygenase EC
1.14.16.2) is a pteridine-requiring monooxygenase that catalyzes
the first and rate-limiting step in catecholamine biosynthesis.
In cells of the nervous system and adrenal medulla that produce
these catecholamines, phosphorylation is the major mechanism of
regulation of enzymatic activity in response to short-term
physiological stimulation (c.f. ref i). In vitro, this activation
is mediated by an increase in affinity for pteridine cofactor
with no change in affinity for substrate tyrosine.
In addition, TH can be activated in vitro by trypsin
proteolysis (2,3). This treatment produces a 34 kDa fragment from
the 60 kDa monomer. The trypsin-digested TH (tTH) is
catalytically active and thus contains the catalytic domain of
the enzyme. The 34 kDa fragment, however, cannot be further
activated by phosphorylation (2) suggesting that proteolysis
removes a region of the enzyme which contains the phosphorylation
sites. These observations are consistent with the model (4,5)
that the TH monomer is composed of two functional regions which
are separable by proteolysis: a catalytic domain corresponding to
tTH and a regulatory region which presumably contains the
phosphorylation sites. Furthermore, based on comparison of the
eDNA sequences, it has been proposed (4,5) that the catalytic
domain of TH corresponds to the region which shares a high degree
of homology with the related aromatic amino acid monooxygenases,
phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) (5,6) and tryptophan hydroxylase
(TPH) (7) and that this homology reflects a conservation of
sequences required for catalysis. In contrast, it has been
proposed that the non-homologous N-terminal region which contains
the phosphorylation sites (8) is involved in the regulation of
enzyme activity and in directing substrate specificity. Although
the sequence of the phosphorylation sites of TH (8) and PAH (9)
1447
Vol. 151, No. 3, 1988 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
have been reported, this model remains unconfirmed, since the
structure of tTH has not been identified nor have the sequences
of the catalytically regions of either PAH or TPH been
determined.
We sought to investigate the structural and functional
characteristics of tTH with respect to the native enzyme. Toward
this aim, bovine adrenal tTH was purified to homogeneity and its
N-terminal amino acid sequence was determined. The mechanism of
activation of TH by proteolysis was investigated by kinetic
analysis. A preliminary account of this work has been presented
elsewhere (i0). MATERIALS AND METHODS
L-[U-14C] tyrosine (500 mCi/mol) and Silver stain Detection System were from New England Nuclear. Electrophoretic grade acrylamide and SDS and molecular weight standards were purchased from Bio-Rad. Bovine pancreas trypsin (type III) was from sigma. 6-methyl 5,6,7,8,tetrahydropterin (6MPH4) was from Calbiochem- Behring. Native bovine adrenal TH was partially purified as previously reported (ii) up to the first DEAE-cellulose column. Tyrosine hydroxylase activity was determined by the method of Coyle (12) as modified by Reis et al. (13). One unit of activity corresponds to 1 nmol DOPA/ mg/ 7 min. Protein concentration was determined by the method of Lowry (14).
Trypsin-digested tyrosine hydroxylase was isolated from bovine adrenal medulla as previously described (ll).Briefly, tissue was homogenized in 3 vol of potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 (buffer A) containing 0.3 M sucrose and centrifuged at i00,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C. The pellets were resuspended in buffer A and digested with trypsin (0.5 mg/ml) for 15 min at 30°C. Digestion was stopped by the addition of 4-fold excess soybean trypsin inhibitor and centrifuged as above. The tTH was purified from the supernatant as described (ii) up to the second DEAE-cellulose column.
For N-terminal sequencing, tTH was further purified by preparative SDS-PAGE. i00 - 120 ug of protein was loaded on 10% gels and electrophoresis preformed according to the method of Laemmli (15). Protein bands were visualized by the sodium acetate shadowing technique described by Higgins and Dahmus (16). Bands corresponding to tTH were identified by comparison with MW standards. The protein was electroeluted overnight in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate containing 0.1% SDS using an ISCO model 1750 electroconcentration cell (3 watts, constant power). Protein was recovered by precipitation with 4 volumes acetone:methanol (i:i) and dissolved in HPLC-grade water containing 0.05% SDS. Purity of the sample was assessed by SDS-PAGE using silver stain detection as described by the instructions of the manufacturer (New England Nuclear); the protein concentration was estimated by amino acid analysis using a Beckman 6300 Amino Acid Analyzer.
Protein sequence analysis of 200 pmols of the purified tTH was carried out with an Applied Biosystems 470A Protein Sequencer and a 120A Pth Analyzer.
Michaelis constants of native and trypsin-digested bovine TH were determined by Lineweaver-Burke kinetic analysis. Data was analyzed by linear regression analysis.
1448
Vol. 151, No. 3, 1988 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Bovine adrenal tTH was purified to apparent homogeneity by
preparative SDS-PAGE (Figure i). Since the protein was isolated
from denaturing gels, it was not enzymatically active. However,
the 34 kDa protein, which was readily identified as the major
band in the preparation, comigrated with enzymatically active tTH
when run in parallel on SDS gels and was immunoreactive with tTH
antisera on Western blots (not shown).
The purified protein was subjected to protein sequence
analysis and the sequence of 17 amino acids was determined (Table
I). The N-terminus of bovine tTH corresponded to position 158
(Figure 2A) when compared to the complete sequence of rat TH
deduced from a cDNA (4); an arginine at position 157 was
presumably the N-terminal trypsin digestion site. In addition,
this is the first available sequence for bovine TH. For the
sequences compared, the bovine and rat enzymes are 80%
homologous. However, these data are clearly too limited to infer
homology between the species. Such analysis awaits more extensive
sequencing of the bovine enzyme or cDNA.
?ii
2 ] Figure i: SDS-PAGE of purified bovine adrenal trypsln-digested tyrosine hydroxylase (tTH). Electrophoresis was preformed according to the method of Laemmli (15) using a 10% gel. Protein bands were visualized by silver staining (New England Nuclear). Molecular weight (MW) standards were soybean trypsin inhibitor (21,500 Da), carbonic anhydrase (31,000 Da), ovalbumin (45,000 Da) bovine serum albumin (66,200 Da), and phosphorylase B (92,500 Da). Lane i, MW standards, 200 ng each; lane 2, tTH, 150 rig.
1449
Vol. 151, No. 3, 1988 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Table I Sequence data of bovine trypsin-digested tyrosine hydroxylase (tTH). The sequence was determined for approximately 200 pmols of purified tTH by automated Edman degradation using an Applied Biosystems 470A Protein Sequencer and a 120A Pth Analyzer. The repetitive yield was calculated from yields of representative, stable, Pth-amino acids.
CYCLE A.A PMOL
i ------
2 ------
3 (Gly) 406 4 GIu 86 5 Ser 54 6 Lys 80 7 Val 71 8 Leu 82 9 Trp 51 i0 Phe 64 ii Pro 48 12 Arg 21 13 Lys 37 14 Val 32 15 Ser 17 16 Glu 122 17 Leu 34 18 Asp 114 19 Lys 12
Repetitive Yield = 91%
A N-Terminal Sequence of Trypsin-Digested Tyrosine Hydroxyiase
158 BOVINE: (--X--) gly glu set lys val leu phe arg lys val set g ~ leu asp lys
157 RAT:. arg se t ala arg glu asp lys val pro phe arg lys val set glu leu asp lys (Grima et aL, 1983)
ser 158-~ [arg454 tTH ser40
ser 19., ] ser 153 TH ser 8,.] | | "] i ~arq157
Figure 2A: N-terminal sequence of bovine adrenal trypsin-digested tyrosine hydroxylase (tTH) compared with the native enzyme. The bovine protein sequence is shown in comparison with the rat sequence deduced from a cDNA clone by Grima et al. (4). The N- terminus of bovine tTH corresponds to postion 158 of the rat holoenzyme; an arginine at 157 was presumably the N-terminal site of trypsin digestion. (-) indicates that a predominant amino acid was not identified.
Figure 2B: Schematic representation of the predicted structure of tTH compared with native tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). The N- terminus of tTH corresponds to amino acid 158 with respect to the holoenzyme as determined by amino acid sequencing (see Figure 2A). A C-terminal trypsin cleavage in the vicinity of arginine 454 was predicted as explained in the text. tTH does not contain the four phosphorylation sites in the N-terminal region of the enzyme (serine residues 8, 19, 40, and 153) identified by C~p--~6~Tl et al. (8).
1 4 5 0
Vol. 151, No. 3, 1988 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
The predicted structure of tTH with respect to the native
enzyme is illustrated schematically in Figure 2B. As indicated,
this catalytic region occurs in the central and C-terminal
portion of the enzyme; the N-terminus of tTH corresponds to
postion 158. Since the resultant fragment is 39 kDa, there is a
second trypsin cleavage site approximately 45 amino acids (5 kDa)
from the C-terminus. Examination of the sequence of the rat
enzyme reveals an arginine at position 454; cleavage at this site
would generate a fragment of the correct molecular weight.
However, C-terminal analysis of tTH is required to define the
exact C-terminal trypsin digestion site. As is apparent in Figure
2B, the sequence of TH corresponding to the trypsin fragment does
not include the N-terminal phosphorylation sites (8). Consistent
with the predicted model (2,4), the regulatory region of TH is
distinct from the catalytic domain.
The sequence of the catalytic region of TH corresponds to
the region of the enzyme which shares 70% homology with PAH (5,6)
and TPH (7). This is in contrast to the N-terminus which shares
no significant homology and to the C-terminus which is 34%
homologous with PAH (6). These data indicate that the catalytic
regions of these hydroxylases are selectively conserved. The
sequences of the catalytic regions of PAH or TPH have not been
determined. However, Iwaki et al. (17) have reported that the
catalytically active 35kDa region of PAH is generated by
proteolysis of an ii kDa fragment from the N-terminus and a 5 kDa
fragment from the C-terminus of the native enzyme. This 35 kDa
catalytic region of PAH aligns with the sequence of native TH
which contains the 34 kDa tTH and is highly homologous to PAH.
To determine the characteristics of the catalytic domain of
TH compared with the native enzyme,the kinetic parameters of the
tTH and native TH were assessed. Assays were conducted at pH 5.8
for native TH and at pH 6.1 for tTH since, in agreement with a
previous report (2), we found that proteolysis resulted in a
shift in pH optima~ As determined by Lineweaver-Burk kinetic
analysis (Table II) bovine tTH has a lower K m for both substrate
(1.6 x 10-5 M) and cofactor (8.0 x 10 -5 M) than the native enzyme
(3.9 x 10 .-5 M and 2.9 x 10 -4 M~ respectively)~; the apparent Vmax
in the presence of either substrate or cofactor was appropriately
increased for tTH" Similar results have been reported for
proteolytic activation of rat TH (3). These data indicate that
pro~teolysis ~ctivates~ TH ~ia an~ incTease i~ ~ffinity for both
Vol. 151, No. 3, 1988 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Table II: Kinetic constants of bovine trypsin-digested TH compared with the native enzyme. Bovine TH was purified as described (ii) up to the DEAE-cellulose column. The enzyme was incubated in the presence or absence of trypsin (0.5 mg/ml) for 15 min at 30°C in i0 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0. Enzyme activity was determined by the method of Coyle (12) as modified by Reis et al. (13) in the presence of 100 mM sodium acetate at pH 5.8 for TH or at pH 6.1 for tTH. Michaelis constants were determined by Lineweaver-Burk kinetic analysis . The K m for 6MPH 4 was assessed in the presence of i00 uM tyrosine; the K m for tyrosine was determined in the presence of 1 mM 6MPH 4.
Tyrosine 6MPH 4 Km Vmax Km Vmax (um) (nmols/7'/mg) (um) (nmols/7'/mg)
Native 39 +_ 5 10.3 +_ i.I 286 + 4 9.7 _+ 1.2
Trypsin-digested 16 ~ 2 21.5 ~ 1.0 80 +_ 7 22.3 + 13
substrate and cofactor. Although the trypsin fragment contains
the catalytic site, and thus the binding sites for substrate and
cofactor, the N-terminus of the native enzyme imposes additional
constraints for binding.
In summary, the catalytic domain of TH is contained within a
34 kDa region of the enzyme, the sequence of this region is
highly homologous to the corresponding regions of PAH and TPH.
Proteolysis results in removal of phosphorylation sites and
corresponds to an increase in affinity for both substrate and
cofactor. Further experiments are necessary to define the role of
the N-terminus in the regulation of cofactor binding and in
directing substrate specificity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors acknowledge Onyou Hwang for many helpful discussions and for critical evaluation of the manuscript and Tony Fonzi for excellent technical assistance.
i.
2.
REFERENCES
Joh, T.H., Hwang, 0., and Abate, C. (1986). In: Neuromethods: Neurotransmitter Enzymes, Alan A. Boulton, Glen B. Baker, and Peter H. Yu (Eds.), Humana Press, Clifton, New Jersey, pp. 1-32.
Vigney, A. and Henry, J.P. (1982). Biochem. Biophys. Research Comm. 106:1-7.
3. Kuckenski, R. (1973). J. Biol. Chem. 248:2261-2265.
1452
Vol. 151, No. 3, 1988 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
4.
5.
6.
Grima, B., Lamouroux, A., Blanot, F., Biquet, N.F., and Mallet, J. (1985). Proc. Natl. Acad. sci. USA 8_/2:617-621.
Ledley, F.D., DiLella, A.G., Kwok, S. and Woo, S.L.C. (1985). Biochemistry 2_44:3390-3394.
Dahl, H. and Mercer, J.F.B. (1986). J.Biol. Chem. 216:4148- 4153.
7. Grenett, H.C., Ledley, F.D., Reed, C.C., Woo, S.L.C. (1987). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 8_~4:5530-5534.
8. Cambell, D.G., Hardie, D.G., and Vulliet, P.R. (1986). J. Biol. Chem. 261:10489-10492.
9. Wretborn, M., Humble, E., Ragnarsson, U., and Engstrom, L. (1980). Biochem. Biophys. Research Comm. 9_33:403-408.
i0. Abate, C., Smith, J., and Joh, T.H. (1986). Soc. Neurosci. Abstract i_22:601.
ii. Joh, T.H. and Ross, M.E. (1983). In:Immunochistochemistry, A.C. Cuello (Eds.), IBRO, pp. 121-138.
12. Coyle, J.T. (1972). Biochemical Pharm. 2_!1:1935-1944.
13. Reis, D.J., Joh, T.H., and Ross, R.A. (1975). J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 193:775-784.
14. Lowry, G.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J. (1951). J. Biol. Chem. 193:265-275.
15. Laemmli, U.K. (1970). Nature 227:680-685.
16. Higgins, R.C. and Dahmus, M.E. (1979). Anal. Biochem. 93:257-260.
17. Iwaki, M., Phillips, R.S., and Kaufman, S. (1986). J. Biochem. 261:2051-2056.
1453