chatham house annual review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 mb

52
New power dynamics Security challenges Economic interdependencies Resource futures Law and governance Annual Review 2013–14 Navigating the new geopolitics

Upload: danghanh

Post on 17-Dec-2016

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

New power dynamics Security challengesEconomic interdependenciesResource futures Law and governance

Annual Review 2013–14Navigating the new geopolitics

Page 2: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, is a world-leading source of independent analysis, informed debate and influential ideas on how to build a prosperous and secure world for all.

Page 3: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Contents

Chatham House | 1

Introduction 2–3 2013–14 Review

Aboutus 4–7 What we do at Chatham House

Africa|Asia|Eurasia|MENA|US

8–13 New power dynamics

Asia|Cyber|Energy|MENA|Nuclear

14–19 Security challenges

Africa|Europe|Finance|G20

20–25 Economic interdependencies

Asia|Energy|Food|Water

26–29 Resource futures

ArmedConflict|Health|HumanRights

30–35 Law and governance

36 HonoraryTreasurer’sReport

37 FinancialHeadlines

38 Patron,PresidentsandCouncil

38 PanelofSeniorAdvisersandindividualsupporters

40 FinancialSupport

44 StaffandAssociateFellows

Page 4: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

2 | Chatham House

Chairman’sStatementI am delighted to report that 2013–14 was another successful year for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, as the organization deepened and expanded further its research output and convening activities in a truly qualitative manner.

I wrote last year, my first as Chairman, that my role is to support and enable the Director and the Chatham House team in their strategic objectives, which are to enhance our capabilities where required; implement new initiatives; ensure that we have the space and capacity to accommodate expansion; and secure longer-term funding. These goals still stand and we have made significant progress on nearly all fronts.

We now have 140 full-time members of staff, with much of the growth coming from the continuing expansion of research. Total income for 2013–14 was £12,766,000, up from £9,845,000 the previous year (see the Honorary Treasurer’s Report for further details). Combined with this growth is an increasing diversity in our sources of funding, with a particular rise in the level of grants from foundations. In addition, the financial contributions from our sponsored conferences and our discretionary fundraising are significantly higher. Membership continues to grow in a steady fashion in all categories.

Following the acquisition of the ground floor of Ames House (next door to Chatham House in Duke of York Street) and with further growth anticipated in the years ahead as we approach our centenary in 2020, it has been recognized that we lack the necessary financial reserve upon which to base our longer-term plans. The Council has therefore established a Second Century Initiative that will run until the institute’s centenary. This Initiative will help Chatham House to acquire the long-term resources to ensure its independence.

Hillary Clinton, former US Secretary of State and winner of last year’s Chatham House Prize, told us that in these fast-changing times we all need to hold on to our values and be smart as we navigate future challenges – and that she counts on Chatham House to help do this. At our conference on ‘Combating Global Corruption’, Mo Ibrahim, Founder and Chair of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, noted the paramount importance of credibility for businesses and governments alike. Both speakers reminded me that the institute’s role is as highly valued as ever, and its integrity has never been more important.

One measure of how highly we are regarded in our field was our ranking in January 2014 as the top non-US think-tank for the sixth consecutive year, and the second best think-tank in the world for the third year in a row, in the University of Pennsylvania’s annual Global Go To Think Tank Index of more than 6,000 peer organizations from across the world.

Introduction

2013–14 Review

Chatham House research income (£’000)

20001,

224

1,50

92002

1,72

8

1,85

3

2004

2,22

2

2,17

1

2006

2,49

0

2,32

2

2008

3,19

4

3,62

6

2010

3,91

2

3,94

0

2012

5,03

2

2014

5,28

6

7,44

8

Amendments to the Charter and By-laws were unanimously approved at the Annual General Meeting in July 2013 and subsequently approved at a Privy Council meeting on 11 December. These changes allowed the institute to bring its governing documents up to date with current legislation, remove redundant provisions and improve the clarity and definition of key elements in both documents to better reflect our current requirements.

This year Mohammed Abdel-Haq, Ryan Gawn and Martin Giles will step down as Council members. I would like to thank each of them for their engagement, which together with that of all my Council colleagues, our Presidents and Senior Advisers has been invaluable in shaping the institute’s impact and recent successes.

Finally, I would like to commend the Director, Robin Niblett, and Chatham House staff and associate fellows for the many achievements and outputs noted in this year’s Annual Review. I am also immensely grateful to our members and supporters for their contributions and the ongoing and active roles they play in the successes of the institute. I am particularly pleased to acknowledge and welcome new donors who are broadening our existing networks and support base. Thanks to you all, Chatham House has not only maintained but also enhanced its reputation as one of the world’s most trusted and independent policy institutes on international affairs.

Stuart Popham

Page 5: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 3

Director’sStatementChatham House made significant progress on a number of fronts in 2013–14. I will highlight four here. First, Chatham House strengthened and expanded its outputs in the institute’s four areas of focus: international security including global health security; international economics; energy, environment and resources; and area studies and international law.

The quality and scope of our research and convening continued to benefit from our independent and trusted reputation around the world, and our ability to engage outwards from the heart of London. For example, together with the Centre for International Governance Innovation in Canada, we launched earlier this year the Global Commission on Internet Governance, chaired by Carl Bildt, Sweden’s minister of foreign affairs.

Our Resources Futures report was ranked second in the world in the category of Best Policy/Study Report, and the institute was assessed as having the third Best Transdisciplinary Research Programme by the University of Pennsylvania in its 2013 Global Go To Think Tank Index. And another report, using new research to identify volumes of theft of crude oil in Nigeria, had a major international impact in the sector and was widely and repeatedly cited in the international press, including the International New York Times, the Financial Times, The Economist and Foreign Policy, as well as on the BBC and CNN.

Many of our studies are focused on resolving some of today’s most intractable challenges, so it is important for us to draw effectively on the lessons of our earlier work, which goes back almost a century. This year we officially launched our digital archive in collaboration with Cengage. This provides access to our rich history of content in over half a million pages of primary sources, ensuring that the institute will remain a vital source of accessible information and analysis for future generations.

Second, our ability to attract leading and emerging thinkers from a growing range of sectors and backgrounds has also been strengthened this past year. We can now engage future leaders from around the world as fellows in our Academy for Leadership in International Affairs. The Academy was launched in September 2013 with the support of an Academy Advisory Board, chaired by The Rt Hon the Baroness Scotland of Asthal QC, Chatham House Co-President. This year we hosted Academy Fellows from China, Georgia, Japan, Russia and Syria, and their inputs have broadened further the perspectives we can offer. The intention is to expand the number of Academy Fellows this year from six to ten.

I am also pleased to welcome Kevin Rudd, former prime minister and foreign minister of Australia, as a distinguished visiting fellow. His role at Chatham House will be to contribute to the institute’s activities relating to Asia, including China, the role of the G20 and climate change. Also, in March 2014, we appointed a new Head of the Asia Programme, Dr John Swenson-Wright, who will lead the institute’s growing agenda of work on this increasingly important region of the world.

Third, our new logo and redesigned website are intended to provide the institute with an enhanced calling card that will be better understood by our networks around the world. By reintroducing our formal name ‘The Royal Institute of International Affairs’ alongside ‘Chatham House’, we underscore the fact that the institute is not only a trusted venue for debate but also one that undertakes rigorous analysis of major international developments. It also highlights the independence we derive from our Royal Charter.

Fourth, given that London is, arguably, the world’s first global capital, we were conscious that the city lacked a major annual event on international affairs. The inaugural Chatham House London Conference, which was held on 3 June at Lancaster House, aims to use London’s advantages as a global hub in order to foster a comprehensive debate on the systemic risks facing the world as a result of the deepening process of globalization.

As noted by the Chairman, our progress must be acknowledged in the context of all those who support us. Our Presidents, Council, Senior Advisers, members and individual supporters provide the guidance and the resources that Chatham House staff and our associate fellows need to develop new ideas and convene debates on international affairs. In turn, the institute’s staff and associate fellows have continued to rise to the challenge through a commitment to excellence in all that they do, which is clearly visible in this year’s Annual Review.

Dr Robin Niblett

Page 6: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

OriginsIn 1919 British and American delegates to the Paris Peace Conference, appalled by the waste of human life caused by the First World War, conceived the idea of an Anglo-American institute of foreign affairs to study international problems.

In the event, the British Institute of International Affairs was founded in London in July 1920 and the American delegates established the Council on Foreign Relations separately in New York. The institute received its Royal Charter in 1926 and became the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Since 1923 the institute has been based at Chatham House and is now more commonly known by this name. Chatham House, the home of three former British prime ministers, is located in historic St James’s Square close to key government departments in the heart of London.

Independentanalysis

• Our reports, papers, books and other research output provide independent and in-depth analysis.

• International Affairs, a leading journal of international relations, combines policy relevance with an academic, in-depth analytical approach to contemporary world politics.

• The World Today, the institute’s magazine, presents authoritative analysis and commentary on current topics. It provides a vital background for experts, business planners, academics and others.

• The Chatham House website received 1,633,316 individual visits last year.

• The institute received more than 2,000 citations in major international media outlets during 2013–14. Chatham House is now placed in the top five, in terms of media coverage, in comparison with the world’s leading think-tanks.

MissionChatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, is a world-leading source of independent analysis, informed debate and influential ideas on how to build a prosperous and secure world for all.

The institute:

• engages governments, the private sector, civil society and its members in open debates and confidential discussions about significant developments in international affairs;

• produces independent and rigorous analysis of critical global, regional and country-specific challenges and opportunities;

• offers new ideas to decision-makers and -shapers on how these could best be tackled from the near to the long term.

Demand for Chatham House’s research, convening capacity and ideas is growing. In response, the institute is focusing its efforts on three priorities: expanding and deepening core areas of research capacity; engaging emerging leaders from around the world, through the creation of an Academy for Leadership in International Affairs within the institute; and gaining access to additional physical space adjacent to the institute’s current premises in order to accommodate the first two priorities.

Aboutus

What we do at Chatham House

4 | Chatham House

Whatwedo

Energy,environment

and resources

Internationalsecurity

International economics

Area studiesand international

law

Page 7: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Informeddebate

• Around 120 events for members and some 15 major one- or two-day conferences last year enabled world leaders and experts to exchange ideas.

• Research programmes hosted more than 250 workshops, seminars and briefings on a range of policy questions.

• Experts frequently provide evidence to government officials and legislators in Beijing, Brussels, Delhi, London, Washington and other capitals.

• Regular briefings for corporate partners and members allow them to interact with invited speakers under the Chatham House Rule.

Newpolicyideas

• A number of research projects culminate in Chatham House Reports which make recommendations for tackling a range of key policy challenges.

• These recommendations are frequently developed iteratively with leading policy-makers, giving them a stake in the ideas.

• Experts provide briefings with their ideas to government officials and legislators in relevant capitals around the world.

• Chatham House consistently ranks highly in the University of Pennsylvania’s annual Global Go To Think Tank Index, where it has been assessed by its peers as the No. 1 think-tank outside the US for six consecutive years and No. 2 worldwide for the past three years.

MembersEver since its founding in 1920, Chatham House has relied on its members, both individuals and corporates, to support its mission, especially its role as a platform for informed debate on the most pressing issues in international affairs. Members are drawn from the worlds of business, diplomacy, academia, politics, the media and civil society. They play an essential role in questioning and challenging world leaders and other speakers when they visit Chatham House. While the majority are UK-based, overseas members (based in more than 76 countries) form an increasingly significant proportion of the total.

Chatham House benefits from a wide range of philanthropic, research-related and membership support. This diversity of support is critical to the independence of the institute.

The Chatham House Council is composed of members of the institute, elected annually for a three-year term. The Council may co-opt a small number of additional members each year.

Chatham House | 5

It is my great honour to speak to you here today in the shrine of foreign policy thought.Ivica Dačić, Prime Minister of Serbia (2012–14)

Ivica Dačić, Prime Minister of Serbia (2012–14), speaking on ‘Serbia’s Future in Europe’ in October 2013.

Julie Bishop, Foreign Minister, Australia, speaking on ‘The Evolution of Australian Foreign Policy’ in March 2013.

Chatham House provides a forum in which I can meet members and international speakers with valuable insights and updates on my particular field of activities.Dr David Skidmore OBE MA MD FRCS Consulting Surgeon and member of Chatham House

Page 8: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Aboutus

6 | Chatham House

2013

JulyReport on IraqIraq on the International Stage: Foreign Policy and National Identity in Transition warned about the dangers of exploiting sectarian discourses in the country and the region.

AugustThe World Today focus on the ArcticA special issue of The World Today focused on the globalization of the Arctic, with senior research fellow Charles Emmerson looking at the competition for its vast wealth of natural resources.

SeptemberAcademy for Leadership in International AffairsThe Academy welcomed the first intake of fellows − potential and established leaders from around the world who spend up to twelve months at Chatham House.

OctoberFocus on foreign correspondentsBill Neely of ITV News (below), Harriet Alexander from The Telegraph, and Professor Richard Sambrook from Cardiff University discussed the future of international news reporting.

NovemberExtractives industries report launchConflict and Coexistence in the Extractives Industries warned that disputes over extractives projects are set to escalate – the report’s recommendations were widely welcomed by experts and policy-makers.

DecemberAfghanistan: Opportunity in CrisisIn the run-up to the 2014 presidential elections in Afghanistan, Chatham House experts prepared publications, events, podcasts and video interviews on how Western governments can encourage and support stability.

I am delighted to be associated with Chatham House. We are living in fast-changing times. We have to hold on to our values and our ideals but we have to be smart about how we chart our course forward together. I count on Chatham House to be one of the guides as we navigate to whatever the future holds for us.Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State (2009–13), receiving the Chatham House Prize in October 2013

Left: Baroness Scotland QC, Co-President of Chatham House, speaking at the 2013 Chatham House Prize award ceremony.

Far left: From left to right: Baroness Scotland QC in conversation with Bill Clinton, Kevin Rudd and Lynn Forester de Rothschild at the Chatham House Prize award ceremony.

Page 9: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 7

2014

JanuaryInternational Affairs 90th anniversaryAn event to mark the 90th volume of the journal included remarks on its history and contribution to international relations by Professor Sir Lawrence Freedman and Professor Christopher Hill.

FebruaryJeremy Paxman on Britain and the Great WarIn an event chaired by Dr Anthony Seldon, Master, Wellington College, broadcaster Jeremy Paxman spoke about his book Great Britain’s Great War.

MarchParliamentary briefingThe institute briefed members of parliament on the key foreign policy challenges facing the UK in the wider Middle East.

AprilLaunch of new brandChatham House introduced its new brand, including the new logo and redesigned publications.

MayOnline archive partnershipChatham House announced that its partnership with Gale Cengage Learning would make previously unseen archive documents available via the library and on subscription.

JuneWebsite redesignChatham House launched its new website, to provide a better user experience, including mobile- and tablet-responsive designs.

Left to right: Martti Ahtisaari, President of Finland (1994–2000), Nobel Peace Laureate, 2008 with Lakhdar Brahimi, United Nations-Arab League Special Representative to Syria, and Jimmy Carter, President of the United States (1977–81), Nobel Peace Laureate, 2002, discussing ‘Can The Two State Solution Be Saved?’ in July 2013.

UK Foreign Secretary William Hague at the inaugural London Conference in June 2014 with Chatham House Director Robin Niblett. Each year the institute hosts around 400 events in London and internationally.

Right: Obiageli Ezekwesili, Senior Economic Adviser, Africa Economic Development Policy Initiative, Open Society Foundations at the inaugural Chatham House London Conference in June 2014.

Far right: Ruan Zongze, Vice President, China Institute of International Studies and Alyson Bailes, Adjunct Professor, University of Iceland at the London Conference.

Page 10: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

8 | Chatham House

China’sgrowingglobalimpactThe Asia Programme’s research on China explores the drivers and implications of the country’s continued growth and its global impact. This includes the changes in its official approaches to international affairs and global governance, the external impact of organic social and economic developments in China, and the ways in which various Chinese actors influence and respond to developments in Asia and beyond.

A research paper by Tim Summers showed how China’s evolving ‘global personality’ shapes its relations with other powers in Asia and further afield. It also argued the complex dynamics behind this evolution can create more difficulties in the Chinese–US relationship in particular.

Africa|Asia|Eurasia|MENA|US

New power dynamics

China’s more assertive regional policy, the crisis in Ukraine and its consequences for relations between the West and Russia, and the deepening turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa are all contributing to an uncertain world. Chatham House is addressing these issues and other changes in the dynamics of international power through research outputs and meetings.

Since 2011, Chatham House has also produced research and provided advice on China-related topics to policy-makers at the European Commission as part of the EU-funded consortium Europe China Research and Advice Network (ECRAN). Now in its fourth year, ECRAN has commissioned more than 100 policy briefings and 25 extended studies. These have covered a range of topics including cross-Strait military relations, education in China’s minority areas, Chinese innovation collaboration with Europe and economic integration in the Pearl River Delta. ECRAN has continued to promote its research by convening events across Europe, involving EU decision-makers and the growing community of European specialists on China.

Left: People stand in a metro train during the rush hour in Beijing. China’s continued growth and increasing economic power are shaping new power dynamics regionally and globally.

Right: A pro-Russian militant eats next to his guns in the regional state government building seized by separatists in the eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk.

Professor John Ikenberry, Albert G Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University and Eastman Professor, Balliol College, Oxford, speaking on ‘The Rise of China and the Future of Liberal World Order’ in May 2014.

Page 11: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 9

ChallengesintheMiddleEastandNorthAfricaIran’s cautious rapprochement with the West, regime change in Egypt and Tunisia’s delicate transition reflect significant shifts that continue to redefine power dynamics within, between and beyond states in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), highlighting the volatility of political processes across the region. To understand the complexity of the competing aspirations and interests that drive political change, the MENA Programme has placed inclusive political dialogue at the heart of its work. As lead implementer of the G8’s Broader Middle East and North Africa Initiative, Chatham House has provided a unique platform for dialogue between regional civil society organizations and governments. Building on last year’s success, the Young Arab Analysts Network International continues to empower new researchers from Morocco to engage more effectively with policy communities at home and abroad, cementing the impact of youth-led networks of policy thinkers across North Africa.

The Academy Asfari Fellowship, a joint initiative with the Asfari Foundation, has also brought fellows from the Middle East to Chatham House where they have provided a local perspective on some of the most pressing challenges facing the region. They have joined other fellows from China, Japan and Eastern Europe in the first year of Chatham House’s Academy.

Ukraine,RussiaandtheWestThe crisis in Ukraine, and its consequences for relations between the West and Russia, have been at the forefront of the work of the Russia and Eurasia Programme, which has been highlighting the risks and dangers that led to this year’s events since the mid-1990s. Numerous programme publications have pointed out the direct contradiction between Western and Russian attitudes towards the post-Soviet states. Western governments, however, articulated a narrative of ‘steadily improving relations’ with Russia. James Sherr’s 2013 book, Hard Diplomacy and Soft Coercion, also provided a timely study of the mechanisms of Russia’s influence abroad.

In February 2014, as the crisis escalated, the Russia and Eurasia Programme organized an emergency expert-level meeting to outline Western policy options on Russia and Ukraine in advance of an EU foreign ministers’ meeting to decide on sanctions. During the year, the programme has also hosted a wide range of speakers, including Vitaliy Klitschko and Evgeny Kiselev from Ukraine and Vladimir Shemyakin from Russia, who offered their take on the current crisis, as well as on other developments in the post-Soviet space. The programme has also been commissioned to organize a workshop to define principles for the United Kingdom’s longer-term policy towards Russia, and continues to publish research papers and commentary on Central Asia and the South Caucasus.

Sir Roderic Lyne, Vice Chair of Chatham House Council (left), and Mikhail Margelov, Chairman, Foreign Affairs Committee of the Federation Council of Russia, discussing ‘Russia’s Vision for the Middle East and North Africa’ in December 2013.

Mona Zulficar, Founding Partner and Chair, Executive Committee, Zulficar and Partners Law Firm at an event on ‘Egypt: A Political Road Map’ in October 2013.

Page 12: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

10 | Chatham House

Africa|Asia|Eurasia|MENA|USNew power dynamics

DiversifiedengagementsofachangingAfricaAfrica Programme research is tracking how the continent’s countries continue to diversify their international relations as outside interest grows. Foreign governments and businesses are seeking to deepen their engagement with African states, drawn by the continent’s strong economic growth (5.6 per cent in 2013), new natural resource finds, and impact in international forums such as the United Nations, where 28 per cent of members are African.

The Africa Programme at Chatham House is examining these changing dynamics through deep analysis of African governments’ priorities, and countries’ individual political and economic contexts. The programme’s analysis examines the links between the continent’s commercially and politically driven international engagement and economic transformation, democratization, the rule of law, development and stability in sub-Saharan African countries.

Through publications, events in London and African cities and outreach to a diverse network of policy informers, the programme informs international policy debate on Africa’s trajectory. Recent outputs include a report on the implications of the theft of crude oil for export from Nigeria; a paper on Djibouti as a strategic hub; a series of maritime security conferences involving stakeholders from West Africa; and events with the Presidents of Ghana and Guinea and with China’s Special Representative on African Affairs.

ShiftsintheHornofAfricaThe Horn of Africa is a changing region, with shifting political, economic and security relationships between its countries, particularly with the recent addition of South Sudan, now in conflict. The Africa Programme’s Horn of Africa project focuses on international engagement with the region, how regional dynamics and outcomes are affected, and how outcomes might be fostered.

The research deepens understanding of the interactions of regional bodies, of international diaspora communities and their engagement, and of a range of bilateral relations. It informs decision-makers of the multiplicity of influences on outcomes in a complex environment. In 2013, small but strategically important Djibouti was examined in a briefing paper, Djibouti: Changing Influence in the Horn’s Strategic Hub. Dr David Styan provided analysis on the country’s impact on regional and international relations, and its growth as a maritime and military laboratory where new forms of international cooperation are being developed.

Page 13: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 11

Right: HE Thein Sein, President, Republic of the Union of Myanmar, speaking at an event on ‘Myanmar and the Reform Process’ in July 2013.

Far right: Vrinda Grover, Lawyer and Women’s Rights Activist, speaking at an event on ‘Women in India: Law, Violence and Change’ in December 2013.

JapanandtheUnitedKingdomChatham House’s work on Japan focuses on the country’s relations with the United Kingdom through a five-year project funded by the Nippon Foundation and run in partnership with it and the Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation. As part of this project, the Asia Programme released a conference report that included contributions by Japanese experts on various aspects of the UK-Japanese relationship. In addition, a briefing paper by Programme Head John Swenson-Wright considered the prospects for a more proactive Japanese security policy.

In its second year, the project will examine Japan’s role in addressing global challenges. It will provide an opportunity to consider what part, whether singly, jointly or in combination with other international actors, Japan and the UK might play in addressing these challenges.

IndiaandSouthAsiaChatham House’s work on India focuses on its international relations in the region and globally. The Asia Programme explores what motivates Indian foreign policy-making and how the country’s relations with Western powers compare to those with other powers such as Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa in new international groupings including the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and IBSA (India, Brazil and South Africa).

The programme convenes a large number of open and closed meetings on issues relating to South Asia and in 2013 organized a major conference in London exploring prospects for regionalization and reform in India in the run-up to the 2014 general election.

Chatham House research also extends to political dynamics in the rest of South Asia, including Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bangladesh. For example, Charu Lata Hogg examined the obstacles to change in Sri Lanka in a June 2013 paper, while Dr Gareth Price wrote two papers exploring India’s policy towards Myanmar (Burma) and Afghanistan.

Above: Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe leaves Downing Street following a meeting with British Prime Minister David Cameron.

Above left: Supporters wear masks of Narendra Modi during a rally in Mumbai, following his landslide election victory.

Far left: A young boy at work in the fields, watering maize crops just outside Bangui, Central African Republic.

Chatham House is an institute of critical global importance.Angel Gurria, Secretary-General of the OECDFebruary 2014

Far left: James Copnall, BBC Correspondent and author, at an event on ‘Sudan and South Sudan: The Importance of Interdependence’ in March 2014.

Left: HE Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete, President of the United Republic of Tanzania, speaking on ‘Tanzania’s Transformation and Vision 2025: Governing Economic Growth for Social Gain’ in March 2014.

Page 14: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

12 | Chatham House

Europe’splaceintheworldWhat will the world look like in 2030, and what will be Europe’s place in it? In partnership with the think-tank FRIDE, Chatham House produced a major report for the European Commission exploring how power and governance in international affairs will evolve over the coming two decades. Empowering Europe’s Future highlighted the simultaneous trends of growing economic interdependence, shifts in power and political fragmentation. It also examined how these issues will be shaped by patterns of conflict and developments in technology. The report recommended that the EU build technological and research capabilities, transform its approach to energy, and focus its foreign policy on conflict prevention and strategic partnerships, particularly in its neighbourhood.

Africa|Asia|Eurasia|MENA|USNew power dynamics

EliteperceptionsoftheUSinEuropeandAsiaUnderstanding how others see the United States and what factors influence their views can help to guide effective American policy-making. Supported by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation, the US Project published Elite Perceptions of the United States in Europe and Asia in May 2014. The report distilled the results of essays by more than 50 elites in 13 countries in Europe and Asia that explained how they perceived the US and why. These were then contrasted with polling data about the views of the general public in these two regions. The study revealed that Europeans value American soft power and long for a return to US moral authority, which they say has been lacking. Asians, meanwhile, are more concerned with the role of US hard power.

The US Project, with the support of Shell, has also examined the foreign policy implications of the US energy revolution and how this will shape relations with Russia and other former Soviet states. With NATO’s summit in Cardiff in September and the end of its operation in Afghanistan at the close of 2014, the US Project is working with NATO and the UK government (supported also by Canadian National Defence) to help craft a way forward for the organization. And, through the generosity of the MacArthur Foundation, the US Project finished work on a report on Asia-Pacific security and is starting a new study on the changing balance of power in Asia.

Light trails from London traffic, in the area known as Silicon Roundabout. Developments in technology will be one of the issues that shape Europe’s future over the coming two decades.

American views of US global powerUS role today as world leader is:

Source: Pew Research Center, America’s Place in the World 2013 (from Elite Perceptions of the United States in Europe and Asia).

0

10

20

30

40

50

More important than 10 years agoLess important than 10 years ago

%

1974 1984 1994 2004 2013

Page 15: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

JohnSwenson-WrightDr John Swenson-Wright is head of the Asia Programme at Chatham House and university senior lecturer in Japanese politics and international relations at Cambridge University.

He comments regularly for the global media on the international relations of East Asia, particularly on Japan and the Korean peninsula. He has testified on East Asian affairs to the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. He is a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Korea and of the UK-Japan 21st Century Group. He is on the editorial board of Global Asia and is a founding member of the European Japan Advanced Research Network.

Chatham House | 13

PeopleNew power dynamics

RosheenKabrajiRosheen Kabraji is assistant head and a research associate of the Asia Programme at Chatham House. She joined the institute in 2009, after working at the International Institute for Environment and Development.

Her expertise includes politics and society in Pakistan, India and Thailand. Over the past year, she has been working on projects examining the regional implications of the withdrawal of international support from Afghanistan, and the changing dynamics of state centre relations in Indian foreign policy. In 2011 she was featured in the Diplomatic Courier and Young Professionals in Foreign Policy inaugural list of the top 99 most influential international professionals in foreign policy under 33. She has an MPhil in international relations from the University of Cambridge.

IlyaZaslavskiyIlya Zaslavskiy is an Academy Robert Bosch fellow with the Russia and Eurasia Programme. He is a member of the first year of Chatham House Academy fellows. Prior to joining Chatham House in February 2014, he worked as an energy-sector consultant in Moscow and New York for several years.

He specializes in evaluating political and economic environments for the strategic entry of oil companies into developing countries − with a particular focus on the Caspian region and Russia. He is also researching the spread of corrupt practices from Russia and the other former Soviet states into the United States and the UK. A Russian national, he holds an MPhil in international relations from the University of Oxford.

Further reading:

Hard Diplomacy and Soft Coercion: Russia’s Influence Abroad, James Sherr

Far left: Victor Orban, Prime Minister of Hungary, speaking on ‘The Role of Traditional Values in Europe’s Future’ in October 2013.

Left: US Senator Marco Rubio speaking on ‘American Leadership and the Future of the Transatlantic Alliance’ in December 2013.

Page 16: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

14 | Chatham House

HumanitarianimpactofnuclearweaponsChatham House continues to play a leading role in the international initiative to address the humanitarian impacts of nuclear weapons. Through a project supported by the Norwegian Government, it hosted five workshops in the UK, South Africa and Argentina. The workshops brought together a diverse set of stakeholders from civil society and humanitarian organizations to discuss the humanitarian effects of a nuclear detonation.

Experts from the International Security Department also attended the Second Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons in Nayarit, Mexico, where they presented the initial findings of a Swiss-, Austrian- and Mexican-supported report, Too Close for Comfort: Cases of Near Nuclear Use and Policy Options, which was published in April 2014.

Asia|Cyber|Energy|MENA|Nuclear

Security challenges

Over the past year, Chatham House has explored a wide range of security challenges, including the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons, cyber security and internet governance, climate change and energy security, sexual violence in conflict, and Africa’s maritime security. There are also major projects on the prospects for a peaceful political transition in Afghanistan and on the implications of the conflict in Syria for its immediate neighbours – Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Israel – as it enters its fourth year.

In addition, Chatham House hosted the first of its Carrington series of events in July 2013, a discussion with Sir Lawrence Freedman and Ward Wilson on the deterrent value of nuclear weapons, as well as numerous events on a diverse range of nuclear topics. These included: nuclear ethics, the weapons of mass destruction free zone in the Middle East, progress on the US non-proliferation agenda and recent activities of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, with its secretary-general, Lassina Zerbo.

Jane Harman, Director, President and CEO of the Wilson Center, was part of a panel discussion on ‘The Snowden Revelations: One Year On’ in June 2014.

Page 17: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 15

CybersecurityandinternetgovernanceThe International Security Department’s cyber programme is an integral component of its work, reflecting the multitude of security and governance concerns that the cyber realm presents. In the last year, it carried out research and convened events on a variety of issues, including the cyber security challenges to outer-space technology and the potential threat to civil nuclear infrastructure. The department hosted experts such as Sir David Omand and Francis Maude MP, the UK minister for the Cabinet Office and paymaster general. This work continues in 2014 with an internet governance seminar series.

The Global Commission on Internet Governance was launched in January 2014 with the support of Chatham House and the Canadian Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI). Chaired by Sweden’s foreign minister, Carl Bildt, the commission is made up of high-level members from around the world, representing different sectors including the corporate sector, academia and policy-making. Its first meeting took place in May 2014 in Stockholm. The commission will meet regularly over the next two years to consider the challenges related to keeping the internet a safe and secure as well as an open and innovative resource. The commission is supported by a research advisory network of experts who provide in-depth advice and support.

TheKoreanpeninsulaWork by the Asia Programme on the Korean peninsula, much of which has been funded by the Korea Foundation, examines inter-Korean relations, South Korea’s foreign policy and the regional and global implications of North Korea’s nuclear proliferation, as well as the broader security challenges it poses. These challenges will be explored further as part of a new year-long research initiative focusing on regional security challenges in East Asia. South Korea is also the focal point of a three-year comparative research project examining the role of mid-sized ‘creative’ powers in addressing conventional security risks, proliferation challenges and environmental issues.

Above: A South Korean soldier stands guard inside a military armistice committee meeting room in Panmunjom in the Demilitarized Zone between North and South Korea.

Left: Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt, who chairs the Chatham House-CIGI Global Commission on Internet Governance, talks to the press prior to a Foreign Affairs Council meeting in April 2014.

Far left: Admiral Anne Cullerre holds a press conference in the ‘Martine’ life base in the Mururoa atoll, south Pacific, where French forces conducted 138 nuclear weapon tests until 1996.

Professor Sir David Omand GCB, Visiting Professor, King’s College London; Former Security and Intelligence Coordinator; Permanent Secretary, Home Office; Director, GCHQ speaking at an event on ‘Counterterrorism: The Right Response?’ in September 2013.

Liu Xiaoming, Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to the UK, speaking on ‘Political and Security Challenges in Asia: A Chinese Perspective’ in February 2014.

Page 18: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

16 | Chatham House

Asia|Cyber|Energy|MENA|NuclearSecurity challenges

ClimatechangeandenergysecurityExtreme weather has raised more concerns about anthropogenic warming and its future impacts. Against this background, political momentum is building towards the 2015 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change summit in Paris, when governments are set to agree a new global climate deal.

However, climate policy cannot be considered in isolation from economic competitiveness and energy security. Balancing these has become a major challenge for governments in the context of shifting energy interdependencies, slowdowns in emerging economies and sluggish recoveries in developed ones. This has been easier to reconcile in the United States, where shale gas has led to a dramatic fall in energy prices and in import dependency on oil and gas, as shown in the May 2013 briefing paper US Energy: the New Reality. This also has significant implications for US foreign policy as America becomes an ever larger energy supplier to Asia, and China in particular.

AfricanlessonsinmaritimesecurityThe Africa Programme is a leading source of research and policy advice on Africa’s maritime security challenges. In the last year, its work has focused on enhancing coordination and collaboration between stakeholders affected by increased insecurity in West Africa’s waters. A paper in July 2013, Maritime Security in the Gulf of Guinea: Lessons Learned from the Indian Ocean, fed into discussions at a summit on maritime security held for West Africa’s heads of state in Cameroon. The programme also organized six maritime security conferences in 2013–14 including in Ghana, Nigeria and São Tomé and Príncipe, in coordination with the visits of British naval vessels HMS Argyll and HMS Portland to West Africa. Drawing on its strong network of contacts from international navies, west and east African regional bodies, and the legal, insurance and commercial sectors of the shipping industry, the Africa Programme’s maritime events have attracted speakers including Nigeria’s chief of naval staff, Ghana’s chief of defence staff and the foreign minister of Togo. The expertise provided by the programme has also fed into the European Union’s policy on the Gulf of Guinea.

Below: Workers clear scrap metal in Tacloban, Philippines in the wake of Typhoon Haiyan, which left more than 6,000 dead and many more homeless.

Right: Presidents Mahamadou Issoufou of Niger, Ali Bongo Ondimba of Gabon, Faure Gnassingbe of Togo and Idriss Deby Itno of Chad at a meeting on maritime security in the Gulf of Guinea.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Secretary-General, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, speaking on ‘The Future of NATO: A Strong Alliance in an Unpredictable World’ in June 2014.

Page 19: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 17

SyriainaturbulentneighbourhoodAs the conflict in Syria enters its fourth year, Chatham House has placed the country’s immediate neighbours − Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Israel − at the core of its work to understand the conflict’s regional dimensions. In 2014, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Programme has embarked on a major multi-year project to support a coordinated policy response to the crisis through the inclusion of diverse regional perspectives in international policy. This work will explore competing and complementary interests at the bilateral, regional and international levels, and build confidence between Syria’s neighbours. Western Policy Towards Syria: Ten Recommendations, published in December 2013, also proposed innovative policy steps to refocus the response of Western governments to the Syria crisis.

Meanwhile, Iraq’s elections in April 2014 raised important questions about its role as an international actor in an increasingly turbulent region. A major report, Iraq on the Regional and International Stage, reviewed the varied interests, influences and actors in the country’s actions abroad.

Above: Syrian students sit in front of a portrait of President Bashar al-Assad at a polling station in Homs. The exiled opposition called the controversial presidential election a ‘farce’.

Below: A Syrian child stands in the snow in a refugee camp in the town of Arsal in the Lebanese Bekaa valley in December 2013. Thousands of Syrian refugees live in makeshift camps in Lebanon.

Bulent Arinc, Deputy Prime Minister, Turkey, speaking on ‘The Future of Democracy in Turkey: Perceptions and Realities’ in February 2014.

From left: Dr Christopher Phillips, associate fellow, and Dr Claire Spencer, Head, Middle East and North Africa Programme, Chatham House; Roula Khalaf, Middle East Editor, Financial Times; and Lord Williams of Baglan, distinguished visiting fellow, Chatham House, discussing ‘Syria: The Fate of a Nation’ in July 2013.

Page 20: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

18 | Chatham House

Asia|Cyber|Energy|MENA|NuclearSecurity challenges

ChallengesofWesterndefencepolicyWestern governments continue to face major defence policy problems. Following a decade of difficult and controversial wars, public support for military intervention is uncertain. Budget reductions have forced significant cuts in military capability, and a range of new or recurring security problems presents some significant challenges. The International Security Department has researched where and why past Western interventions have proved so problematic, and what lessons should be learnt from the difficult experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan. James de Waal’s report, Depending on the Right People: British Political-Military Relations 2001–10, examined in particular the process and quality of defence policy decision-making. A major speech in March 2014 by the Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Peter Wall, set out how the British army is changing in the light of its past experience and likely future demands on it. The changing character of conflict and its impact on militaries, civilians and societies has been considered in a series of discussion events with international armed forces, NGOs and civil society groups.

Finally, the US Project has been working on roundtables culminating in a publication on the way forward for NATO in advance of its summit in September.

OpportunitiesinAfghanistanandPakistanChatham House’s work on Afghanistan examined the prospects for a peaceful political transition as the presidential election took place this year against the backdrop of the withdrawal of Western troops. The project ‘Afghanistan: Opportunity in Crisis’, headed by Michael Keating and Matt Waldman, has looked at how Western governments can encourage and support stability in the country after 2014, focusing on elections, reconciliation and development. Research also examines Afghanistan’s relations with its neighbours and the development challenges it faces through assessing at the potential benefits of regional engagement in South Asia.

Political instability and Islamic radicalization in Pakistan, and the policies of the West towards Pakistan, are other key research interests for the Asia Programme. Experts have also examined Pakistan’s role in the peace process in Afghanistan, and its regional relationships on issues such as water.

Above left: An Afghan man walks past an election mural in Kandahar. Afghanistan’s presidential election was the third since the fall of the Taliban, with 11 candidates contesting the polls.

Above: Soldiers of 1st Battalion, the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, march through London on their return from a tour in Afghanistan.

CommemoratingtheFirstWorldWarBoth International Affairs and The World Today published special issues commemorating the centenary of the outbreak of the First World War. In The World Today, this included an article by senior fellow James de Waal, who explored the working relationship between politicians and generals in the Great War and in modern-day Iraq and Afghanistan. International Affairs commissioned twelve articles including a review article from authors specializing in the military, political, social and artistic legacies of the war. The journal also organized related activities, including an exhibition of photographs by Michael St Maur Sheil of the battlefields of the Western Front as they are now; an exhibition of bronze friezes of the battlefields by sculptor Philip Blacker, and a specially commissioned performance of music and poetry celebrating the work of Ivor Gurney.

Page 21: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

MichaelKeatingMichael Keating is senior consulting fellow at Chatham House, where he is directing a project on political transition in Afghanistan. Until the end of 2012, he was deputy special representative of the UN secretary-general in Afghanistan. His UN career has included development, humanitarian and political responsibilities in the Middle East, Africa, Geneva and New York. He is an adviser on conflict resolution and continues to undertake assignments for the UN.

He has contributed to a wide range of publications and serves on the board of a number of non-profit organizations promoting environmental, health and education issues. He has an MA in history from the University of Cambridge.

JamesdeWaalJames de Waal is a senior fellow in the International Security Department at Chatham House. He formerly worked for the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, including diplomatic postings at the United Nations, in Berlin and in Santiago, and was seconded to the Ministry of Defence during the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review.

His expertise includes defence policy of the UK and major Western nations, international trends in armed conflict, and government decision-making on military interventions and the role of strategy. In November 2013, he published the Chatham House paper, Depending on the Right People: British Political-Military Relations, 2001–10.

HeatherWilliamsHeather Williams is a research fellow with the International Security Department at Chatham House. Since 2011, she has also been a guest lecturer and teaching assistant at King’s College London. Prior to this, her posts included researcher at the Institute for Defense Analyses (Alexandria, Virginia) and research associate at the Centre for Science and Security Studies.

Her areas of expertise include nuclear non-proliferation and arms control, nuclear strategy, missile defence, and chemical weapons destruction. Her PhD is on the role of trust in US–Russia arms control. She was a co-author on the Chatham House Report, Too Close for Comfort: Cases of Near Nuclear Use and Options for Policy, published in April 2014.

Further reading:

Too Close for Comfort: Cases of Near Nuclear Use and Options for Policy, Patricia Lewis, Heather Williams, Sasan Aghlani and Benoît Pelopidas.

Chatham House | 19

PeopleSecurity challenges

Above: General Sir Peter Wall, Chief of the General Staff, British Army, speaking on ‘Defence Engagement: The British Army’s Role in Building Security and Stability Overseas’ in March 2014.

Above left: Ahmed Rashid, Pakistani journalist and author, in discussion with Bridget Kendall, Diplomatic Editor, BBC, on ‘Pakistan: Implications of the Afghanistan Drawdown’ in July 2013.

Page 22: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

20 | Chatham House

China’srenminbistrategyChina’s financial liberalization and the evolution of its strategy for the renminbi remained a key topic throughout 2013. The International Economics Department undertook a number of joint research projects to study the growing use and impact of the renminbi across Asia, including a workshop in Hong Kong with the Institute for New Economic Thinking and the Centre for International Governance Innovation, and a seminar in Tokyo with the Asian Development Bank Institute. The research results were published in June 2013 in a briefing paper by Paola Subacchi and Helena Huang, Taipei and the Renminbi Offshore Market: Another Piece in the Jigsaw, as well as in an ADBI working paper in December 2013, ‘Expanding Beyond Borders: The Yen and the Yuan’, by Paola Subacchi.

Africa|Europe|Finance|G20

Economic interdependencies

The evolution of China’s renminbi strategy, the imbalances in the eurozone, and global economic governance and the G20 are all high on the international agenda. There is also growing awareness of the economic potential of Latin America, and Chatham House has responded by starting a new research project on this topic. The past year also saw the culmination of a multi-year research project on Yemen, with the publication of a report on corruption and capital flight in that country. More broadly, the institute continues to work with governments and businesses on global economic governance and policy coordination.

Page 23: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 21

TacklingtheeurozonecrisisEurope’s Economic and Monetary Union needs deeper and more effective economic and financial integration, and better governance. The International Economics Department fostered a public debate on these issues through a series of roundtables held in London, Madrid and Rome with experts from national governments, the private sector and international organizations. The research focused on the macroeconomic and fiscal imbalances in the eurozone, on policies for growth and on prospects for a banking union. The project culminated in March 2014 in the publication of a joint Chatham House, Elcano and AREL report, How to Fix the Euro: Strengthening Economic Governance in Europe. The report examined why the eurozone was so badly affected by the crisis, and assessed whether further changes need to be made to the structure of economic governance that underpins it. As eurozone countries move towards closer integration, another project, with the support of the European Commission Representation in the UK, looked at the relationship between the UK and the EU, and assessed the prospects for countries that are not part of the currency union. In particular, it focused on the trends and implications of foreign direct investment and trade arrangements in the UK, and on London’s financial centre, with an analysis of trends in capital movements and the role and impact of financial regulation.

AchangingworldeconomyandtheG20frameworkThe increasingly interconnected world economy requires careful analysis and assessment of challenges, such as global macroeconomic imbalances and the need to foster sustained growth after the global financial crisis. The International Economics Department explored monetary and financial spillovers within the framework of its ongoing partnership with the International Monetary Fund. Its focus on global economic governance and the G20 also included collaboration with the Lowy Institute for International Policy, the Brookings Institution and the Australian government as it chairs the G20 in 2014.

Above: G20 finance ministers and Central Bank governors gather for an official group photo in Sydney.

Left: A boy holding a European flag waits for the start of a rally marking the last day of the European Parliament election campaign in Barcelona.

Far left: George Osborne, the United Kingdom’s chancellor of the exchequer, listens as Li Keqiang, China’s premier, addresses the UK China Financial Forum in London.

Far left: Enrico Letta, Prime Minister of Italy, discusses ‘Italy and the UK in an Evolving EU’ with Chatham House Director, Robin Niblett in July 2013.

Cecilia Malmström, Commissioner for Home Affairs, European Commission, in discussion with Nick Robinson, Political Editor, BBC, on ‘The Future of EU Migration Policy’ in March 2014.

Page 24: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

22 | Chatham House

Zimbabwe’srecoveryandinternationalre-engagementIn April 2014, the Africa Programme published Zimbabwe’s International Re-engagement: the Long Haul to Recovery, a report on priorities to place the country on a path to economic recovery through the normalization of its international relations. Mindful of outstanding values-based rifts, political and human security challenges and systemic impediments, this Africa Programme project targeted the new Zimbabwean government and the opposition, private sector and civil society actors, and regional and international stakeholders with recommendations in support of a process of improved performance and outcomes – economic and social – in the country. The report underscores the government’s need to reach out to a range of actors to avoid further economic decline. The report has been widely commented upon by government officials, the media and civil society activists. In 2013, Chatham House also hosted a roundtable meeting with the first Zanu-PF minister to visit the UK in over a decade.

Africa|Europe|Finance|G20Economic interdependencies

InternationalcompetitivenessandgrowthPartnering with the Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy in the Department of Economics at Warwick University, the International Economics Department at Chatham House analyses the shifting dynamics in the world economy. The research explores the way in which markets, institutions and public policy interact to create and sustain competitive advantage in response to global changes. It aims to develop a better understanding of how to promote institutions and policies that are conducive to successful economic performance. A resulting series of papers has looked at a wide range of topics, including how women in politics can help tackle gender crime, human development as positive freedom, the danger posed to employment by high home ownership, fiscal federalism in the United Kingdom, and improving the effectiveness of pro-poor policies.

A project on industrial transformation, supported by the Toshiba International Foundation (TIFO), culminated in a research report, The World’s Industrial Transformation, published in July 2013, which presented case studies on the aircraft, automotive, pharmaceutical and retail industries.

Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman, Google, in conversation with Nik Gowing, BBC World News, at a conference on ‘Power and Commerce in the Internet Age’ in November 2013.

Page 25: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 23

YemencorruptionandcapitalflightIn Yemen: Corruption, Capital Flight and Global Drivers of Conflict, Chatham House experts examined Yemen’s precarious path towards political and economic reform. The report, published in September 2013, highlighted the obstacles to the country’s development posed by the interdependence of an elite-based political economy; outward capital flows, facilitated by international tax havens; and a looming resource crisis. Its launch brought together international donors and policy-makers to discuss the findings and promote a more careful analysis of Yemen’s political economy. The report was the culmination of a major, multi-year research project led by the Chatham House Yemen Forum, involving intensive fieldwork in the country, expert-level workshops, and detailed consultation with donor representatives, diplomats, defence ministries and civil society organizations.

Far left: US Federal Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen and International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde during the meeting of G20 finance ministers and Central Bank governors in Sydney.

Left: A Zimbabwean woman casts her ballot at a polling station in Domboshava, north of Harare. President Robert Mugabe’s win extended his 33-year grip on power.

Below: A Yemeni artist works on graffiti against corruption, poverty, sectarian wars and the recruitment of child soldiers in the capital Sanaa.

Stefan Dercon, Chief Economist, DFID, speaking on ‘Fragile States, Capital Flight and Tax Havens’ at the launch in September 2013 of a Chatham House report on corruption and capital flight in Yemen.

Page 26: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

24 | Chatham House

Africa|Europe|Finance|G20Economic interdependencies

LatinAmericaintheglobaleconomyOver the last decade, the economic growth rates for Latin America have been among the highest in the world. A major global producer of natural resources, the region saw its exports booming thanks to a favourable cycle in the world’s financial markets characterized by high commodity prices. Today, it has great economic potential to exploit further. However, Latin America’s performance in the near future might be constrained by excessive dependency on natural resources, as well as economic and social inequalities. It also risks getting stuck in the ‘middle-income trap’.

In late 2013, the International Economics Department launched a new project to examine growth performance and to discuss future prospects across Latin America’s largest economies.

The project focuses in particular on regional interdependencies and on the role of the region in the global economy. Building on partnerships with relevant institutions operating in Latin America, such as the Brazilian Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, the project has generated high-level debate on the region and greater awareness of its economic potential in the UK and the EU, while also engaging with key experts, policy-makers and business leaders from Latin America.

Above: Daniela Carrera-Marquis, of the Inter-American Development Bank, speaks at the Clinton Global Initiative Latin America in Rio de Janeiro.

Left: Demonstrators kick in wood panels blocking a bank location after tear gas was fired by the police to break up protests calling for better public education and services in Rio de Janeiro.

HE Otto Pérez Molina, President of Guatemala, speaking on ‘Guatemala: National Security and Regional Implications’ in May 2014.

Page 27: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

LéonieNorthedgeLéonie Northedge is research associate with the Middle East and North Africa Programme at Chatham House. She has a BA in Arabic and Islamic Studies from Oxford University, and has lived in Damascus and Cairo.

Her research interests include the role of civil society in the Middle East, with a focus on Egypt and Yemen. Until recently, she managed the Yemen Forum, a flagship Chatham House project, and she co-authored the project’s concluding report Yemen: Corruption, Capital Flight and Global Drivers of Conflict, published in September 2013.

AhmedSolimanAhmed Soliman is a research assistant in the Africa Programme at Chatham House, coordinating the programme’s work on the Horn of Africa. His expertise spans Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti, Sudan and South Sudan.

In addition to research and publishing, his role includes expanding the Africa Programme’s network of experts and decision-makers, media interviews and outreach. He regularly meets with government officials, parliamentarians, opposition representatives, civil society actors, private-sector representatives and other policy influencers to discuss the trajectory of the region. He has spoken at events in Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya and Europe.

Chatham House | 25

PeopleEconomic interdependencies

Further reading:

How to Fix the Euro: Strengthening Economic Governance in Europe, Stephen Pickford, Federico Steinberg and Miguel Otero-Iglesias (Chatham House, Elcano and AREL report)

DavideTentoriDavide Tentori is a research associate in the International Economics Department at Chatham House. He holds an MSc in economics from the University of Essex and a PhD in institutions and policies from the Catholic University of Milan.

His research interests include macroeconomic policies, trade and economic growth in the European Union and South America. His recent publications include the Chatham House briefing paper Breaking the Vicious Circle: Restoring Economic Growth and Flexibility in Italy, written with Paola Subacchi. His recent research has focused on the evolution of the transatlantic relationship, and he has managed a new series of roundtable events on key Latin American economies.

Page 28: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

26 | Chatham House

ExploringresourceinterdependenciesNatural resources remain abundant at the global level, but their uneven distribution and costs present a strategic challenge for resource-importing countries. While much can be done domestically to tackle inefficient resource use and its knock-on effects, many solutions increasingly require collaborative international approaches. After more than a decade of resource-intensive growth, China lies at the centre of a global web of resource-related interdependencies. Choices made by its leaders and companies over the next decade will have global implications for resource demand, prices and investment in production. The next phase of China’s development and urbanization will require sustainable solutions to challenges such as severe water scarcity, air pollution caused by coal combustion and vehicle emissions, and rising costs of imports of fossil

Asia|Energy|Food|Water

Resource futures

Resource interdependencies, the shale gas revolution and saving oil and gas in the Gulf states are central research topics and build on Chatham House’s long-standing work in these areas. In particular, resource-importing countries face ongoing strategic challenges owing to the cost and uneven distribution of natural resources. Other important issues being addressed in the area of resource futures include food security and managing water in South Asia.

fuels, food and metals. China has sought greater resource security through investments in production overseas, but this confronts Chinese companies for the first time with managing complex, politically sensitive projects abroad.

A new project on China’s resource interdependencies will formulate innovative and concrete policy proposals on how to adjust its development model, and how to strengthen its multilateral or bilateral engagement with global resource markets. This is a collaboration between the Energy, Environment and Resources Department at Chatham House and the Industrial Economy Department of the Development Research Centre of the State Council, a highly influential Chinese think-tank. The first workshop was held in Beijing in March 2014 with leading Chinese and international experts.

Page 29: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 27

SavingandvaluingvitalresourcesintheGulfIn August 2013, Chatham House published the report Saving Oil and Gas in the Gulf, representing the culmination of two years’ research and workshops in the region that convened representatives of more than 60 local institutions with interests in and influence over domestic energy policy. The report argued that the systemic waste of oil and gas in the Gulf states erodes their resilience to economic shocks and increases security risks. It put forward recommendations to improve energy efficiency and to build on opportunities for regional cooperation.

The report stimulated considerable debate and was widely quoted in Arabic and English media throughout the region. Since then, many Gulf states have launched new initiatives on efficiency and clean energy – although, as the report notes, keeping oil and gas conservation on their agenda will require sustained efforts.

Subsequent work on vital resources seeks to develop understanding and build capacity within the region on the challenging question of valuation. This recognizes the interconnected challenges of water, food and energy security, and brings together regional stakeholders with an international network of experts in designing and implementing policies to revalue resources, such as reform of subsidies or water pricing. A final report on this work will include recommendations for how policy-makers can manage the challenging political economy of reform.

TheshalegasrevolutionChatham House’s work in this area began in 2010 with the publication of The Shale Gas Revolution: Hype and Reality, followed by a briefing paper update to the report in August 2012, The Shale Gas Revolution: Developments and Changes. In the past year, based on this work, Professor Paul Stevens submitted evidence to the UK House of Commons Select Committee on Energy and Climate Change, and to the House of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs. He also gave conference papers on the topic in London, Adelaide, Hong Kong, Mexico City, Muscat, Moscow, Milan, Perth and Tokyo, and wrote a number of op-eds for prominent newspapers in the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States. A Chatham House report on the ‘resource curse revisited’ will be published during 2014.

Above: Anti-fracking demonstrators arrive at a protest camp established near a drill site in southern England, organized by ‘No Dash For Gas’ campaigners.

Above left: A shopping mall in Abu Dhabi. Rapid changes in Gulf societies mean they have to develop strategies to conserve energy, and many Gulf states have launched new initiatives on efficiency and clean energy.

Far left: Workers harvest lettuce at a vegetable factory in Kashiwa, Chiba – one of the largest in Japan.

Khalid al-Atiyah, Qatari Foreign Minister, speaking on ‘Qatar’s Foreign Policy’ in December 2013.

Page 30: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

28 | Chatham House

Asia|Energy|Food|WaterResource futures

ManagingwaterresourcesinSouthAsiaIndia and Pakistan are already water-stressed, and population growth will further reduce water availability per person in the years to come. For the past 18 months, the Asia Programme has been researching attitudes towards domestic water management and transboundary water issues in five countries – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan. Working with five local partners, the project aimed to explore the reasons for the disconnect between policy and practice, the implications of the increased securitization of water discourse in South Asia and the scale of the challenge as seen by policy-makers.

In June 2014, the resulting report drew on almost 500 interviews with decision-makers from government, academia, civil society and the private sector. It highlighted differences in approach to water issues in each country as well as attitudes towards upstream and downstream neighbours.

The report made a series of recommendations; if domestic water management is not improved, the implications for internal and international stability will be stark. Despite the significant challenges involved, there is substantial scope for cross-border learning to shift perceptions of water from a zero-sum resource to a resource providing mutual benefit.

FoodsecurityThe impact of the report Managing Famine Risk, which was published in April 2013 and examined the challenges of responding to famine early warnings, continued throughout the year with a major dissemination programme. Seminars convening representatives of governments, humanitarian and donor agencies were held in London, Nairobi, Rome, Geneva, New York, Washington, Dakar and Jeddah.

An influential briefing paper, Edible Oil, shone a spotlight on the precarious food security of the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council, which typically import 80–90 per cent of their needs. It argued that, while oil and gas wealth mean the Gulf states are resilient to spikes in international food prices, they remain vulnerable to import disruptions. The principal risk is regional instability leading to the sustained closure of key choke points such as the Strait of Hormuz and the Suez Canal, through which the majority of Gulf food imports passes. Storage of strategic commodities such as wheat and the diversification and development of port infrastructure can help manage this risk. The paper argued, however, that strategies to subsidize domestic production or acquire farmland in developing countries could prove expensive while doing little to bolster food security.

Above: A commercial ship passes through the entrance to the Suez Canal. There has been concern over the vulnerability of vessels to terrorist attack in one of the world’s potential food choke points.

Bangladesh Afghanistan India

Nepal Pakistan Definition of water stress

1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012

Falling per capita water availability

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

Total renewable water resources per capita (actual) (m3/person/year)

Source FAO, Aquastat (from Attitudes to Water in South Asia).

Page 31: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

RobBaileyRob Bailey is acting research director for the Energy, Environment and Resources Department at Chatham House. Prior to joining the institute, he was head of economic justice at Oxfam.

His expertise includes food security, sustainable agriculture, climate change and adaptation, and biofuels. He has published extensively in these areas, including during the past year: Managing the Political Economy of Low Carbon Development; Edible Oil: Food Security in the Gulf; and Ending Deforestation: Policy Options for Consumer Countries.

He has an MSc in development studies from the London School of Economics and an MA in natural sciences from the University of Cambridge. In 2011, he was named one of the Devex ‘40 Under 40’ international development leaders in London.

GladaLahnGlada Lahn is a senior research fellow in the Energy, Environment and Resources Department at Chatham House. Since joining the institute in 2004, she has worked on a range of international energy projects, including establishing the Fossil Fuels Expert Roundtable series in 2008. More recently, she has worked on domestic energy, water management and pricing, and climate policy with partners in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries.

Prior to working at Chatham House, she was senior research fellow at the Gulf Center for Strategic Studies and also worked as a freelance consultant on Middle East political and economic issues. She has a BA in Arabic and international relations and an MA in near and Middle Eastern studies from the School of Oriental and African Studies, London.

Further reading:

Saving Oil and Gas in the Gulf, Glada Lahn, Paul Stevens and Felix Preston

Chatham House | 29

PeopleResource futures

Water usage by sector (%)

87.8 10.02.2

90.4 7.4

2.2

Agriculture

Source: UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Aquastat (from Attitudes to Water in South Asia).

Household Industry

98.2

1.5 0.3

94.0 5.30.7

1,096

359

630

247

Annual waterwithdrawal

per inhabitant (m3)

India

Bangladesh

Nepal

Pakistan

Page 32: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

30 | Chatham House

InternationallawandarmedconflictInternational law, if it is adhered to, plays a critical role in mitigating the risks posed by armed conflict for civilians and combatants. The International Law Programme has begun work on a project to produce an unofficial manual for the armed forces on how international human rights law affects the conduct of military operations overseas. The need for such guidance stems from recent decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and other international courts, which have led to a re-examination of how human rights law applies in situations of armed conflict as opposed to peacetime.

Most of the crimes currently prosecuted by the international courts and tribunals occurred during armed conflicts. The programme’s series of meetings on ‘Milestones in International Criminal Law’ allows analysis

ArmedConflict|Health|HumanRights

Law and governance

The evolution of international law and new systems of global governance are a core focus of Chatham House research. Over the past year, this has included studies on the classification of conflicts in Syria, Yemen and Lebanon; conflict and coexistence in the relationship between host governments and the extractive industries; the international implications of the theft of crude oil from Nigeria; and forest governance and illegal logging. Chatham House also held a major conference and published two reports on global health governance and financing.

and discussion of significant cases. Armed conflicts were also a recurrent theme of the International Law Discussion Group, which brings together legal experts, policy-makers, academics and civil society representatives. Over the last year, they have addressed, among other topics, the legality of military intervention on humanitarian grounds in Syria and challenges in implementing the Global Arms Trade Treaty.

The programme also convened a workshop on the situations in Syria, Yemen and Libya. The workshop, attended by legal and country experts, focused on the legal classification of these conflicts – a crucial assessment in determining which legal standards govern the conduct of the parties involved. The workshop discussions were summarized in a paper, The Legal Classification of the Armed Conflicts in Syria, Yemen and Libya.

Page 33: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 31

ChinaandinternationalhumanrightsGiven its growing economic power and permanent membership of the UN Security Council, China’s approach to the international human rights system is likely to have significant implications for the future of this system in a multipolar world. A 2012 report on China and the International Human Rights System, authored by Sonya Sceats with Shaun Breslin, associate fellows in the International Law and Asia Programme respectively, presented ground-breaking research on China’s participation in the UN human rights system and revealed a range of perspectives on these issues among experts inside China. A four-day roundtable meeting was held in April 2014 to create a platform for Chinese international law academics working in this area to present their thinking and exchange ideas with counterparts from other countries, as well as to build stronger understanding within the wider international law community of debates in China about the human rights system and China’s role within it. A second roundtable is planned for later in the year in Beijing.

LegalnormsandeconomicdevelopmentintheGulfstatesUnderstanding the legal norms that underpin the political and business structures of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states is crucial for the continuing development of economic and business ties between the GCC and Western states, especially as they build new energy relations with emerging Asian economies. Through its ‘Future Trends in the Gulf States’ project, the MENA Programme undertakes research and analysis on scenarios for their political and economic development.

The workshop summary ‘Law and Citizenship in the GCC’ examined the evolving legal landscape in the Gulf countries, and the role of domestic politics and international norms in spurring legal changes there. Bringing together the views of prominent academics, civil society representatives, entrepreneurs, journalists and bloggers from GCC states, it offered an insight into the regional thinking on international legal norms, human rights, censorship, constitutional development and citizenship. It also examined the legal environment affecting business and corporations in the Gulf states.

Above: Wang Yi, China’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, votes on a resolution regarding Syria’s chemical weapons programme at a UN Security Council meeting.

Right: Saudi officials and businessmen attend the Euromoney conference in May 2014 in Riyadh. The two-day conference focused on Saudi Arabia’s economy and financial system.

Left: Syrian residents inspect heavily damaged buildings in June 2014 in the northern city of Aleppo.

Dominic Grieve QC MP, Attorney General, UK, discusses ‘Britain and the International Rule of Law’ at an event in July 2013.

Elham Saudi, Director, Lawyers for Justice, Libya, speaking on ‘Libya’s Future: Constitution, National Dialogue and the Security Challenge’ in April 2014.

Page 34: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

32 | Chatham House

ConflictandcoexistenceintheextractiveindustriesExtractive industries around the world are facing fresh challenges in ever more complex operating environments. A decade of high prices and fast-growing global demand has raised expectations among stakeholder communities, host governments and investors. At the same time, mineral and hydrocarbons production increasingly takes place in geologically, ecologically and politically challenging regions. A series of bitter disputes has unsettled investors and global markets, and has drawn attention to the fragile and complex relationship between companies and host governments.

In November 2013, Chatham House launched a major report on Conflict and Coexistence in the Extractive Industries. This summarized the results of more than two years of research by experts in the Energy, Environment and Resources Department as well as in several regional programmes. The report argues that disputes about extractives projects are set to escalate in many producer countries, and, if poorly managed, could endanger not only companies’ assets and reputations but also the economic and political stability of the countries concerned.

The report calls on international investors and governments to engage at an early stage with a wider range of stakeholders, conduct industry-wide joint long-term planning, intensify cooperation to raise governance standards, and adapt the way in which contracts are drawn up. The report was welcomed by experts and policy-makers at events in London, Brussels and Wilton Park, and generated significant coverage in mainstream and specialist media, including the Financial Times, Reuters and CNBC Africa.

ArmedConflict|Health|HumanRightsLaw and governance

ResourcegovernanceandcrudeoiltheftfromNigeriaAs many African states undertake simultaneous significant processes of change through democratization, economic growth and diversifying international relations, the Africa research output and outreach of the Africa Programme inform decision-making globally in support of an environment of transparency, accountability and the rule of law. The programme has a strong thread of ongoing work on society and resource governance, and regards strengthening institutions and transparency as a means to foster more equitable transformative growth and to undercut challenges relating to corruption.

Among the 2013 publications was the report Nigeria’s Criminal Crude: International Options to Combat the Export of Stolen Oil by Christina Katsouris and Aaron Sayne. This was the first comprehensive, rigorously researched independent report on the theft of crude oil for export from Nigeria. The report informs decision-makers in Nigeria and internationally on how oil is stolen, the likely shape of theft networks, and likely destinations and impacts. It highlights critical gaps in information and the best policy options as steps towards addressing this specific type of transnational organized crime. The publication was widely reported by the Nigerian and international media, and discussed with government officials, oil companies and other private-sector stakeholders, and civil society actors, to raise the visibility of the issue and its consequences in a balanced and informed way.

Above: Nigeria’s Minister of Petroleum Resources Diezani Alison-Madueke (right) answers journalists at the 164th OPEC meeting in Vienna.

Right: An aerial view shows an open pit at the Batu Hijau copper and gold mine in Sumbawa, West Nusa Tenggara province, Indonesia.

Far right: Children sitting on logs on the outskirts of Yangon, Myanmar (Burma). Demand for precious hardwoods is threatening rare species and helping to drive deforestation in one of the last major areas of tropical forest in Asia.

Page 35: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 33

ForestgovernanceandillegalloggingRecent analysis by Chatham House has revealed continued and widespread illegality in the global timber trade, although the efforts of the EU, through its Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Action Plan, are beginning to have an effect. Chatham House is considering future policy options for the EU to support the forthcoming review of its approach to this issue.

The Energy, Environment and Resources Department has also organized a series of workshops for enforcement agencies to encourage greater effectiveness and coordination in the implementation of EU legislation on illegal timber. In addition, the department convened a high-level expert roundtable for UK and Indonesian government agencies and financial intelligence units as a means to foster improved cooperation in tackling financial crime in the forest sector.

As pressure on land and the demand for resources continue to grow, agriculture is emerging as the greatest driver of deforestation. The department continues to look at ways to reduce deforestation resulting from exploitation for agricultural commodities, including palm oil, beef and soy. Research into policy options to reduce the environmental footprint of agricultural production will be a priority for Chatham House over the coming years.

Chatham House’s work on forest governance and illegal logging is funded by the UK Department for International Development as part of its Forest Governance, Markets and Climate programme.

It is a pleasure to be here today, to discuss Britain and the international rule of law. It is particularly appropriate to be addressing this subject in this place, famed throughout the world for its own rule, for its contributions to the development of the rule of law, and for providing a congenial environment for so many politicians and practitioners to take stock and consider the future development of the concept.Dominic Grieve QC MP, Attorney General, UKJuly 2013

From left: Professor Paul Stevens, Distinguished Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources Department, Chatham House; Francis Egan, Chief Executive, Cuadrilla Resources; The Rt Hon Michael Fallon MP, Minister of State for Energy, Department of Energy & Climate

Change; and Joe Lynam, Business Journalist, BBC, at an event on ‘A Shale Gas Revolution for the UK?’ in April 2014.

Page 36: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

34 | Chatham House

ArmedConflict|Health|HumanRightsLaw and governance

GlobalhealthgovernanceandfinancingFollowing a major conference at Chatham House in December 2011 to mark the tenth anniversary of the report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, the Centre on Global Health Security launched two high-level working groups, composed of representatives from governments, international agencies, academia and civil society, to examine critical issues in global health governance and financing respectively.

The working group on governance considered ideas about reform of the World Health Organization (WHO) beyond those discussed in the agency’s ongoing internal process. It focused in particular on the WHO’s functions, its global role as a technical agency and a policy-making body, its governance and structure, and its financing.

The financing working group focused on the measures that need to be taken by countries and the global community to provide sustainable financing for health

World Health Organization Director-General Margaret Chan (front right) speaks in a panel discussion about ‘antimicrobial resistance’ in Geneva, Switzerland.

services, including strengthening domestic and external financing and moving towards a global agreement on sustainable financing, including as part of the post-2015 development agenda.

The working groups led to the publication of two reports in May 2014, What’s the World Health Organization For? and Shared Responsibilities for Health: A Coherent Global Framework for Health Financing, which were launched in Geneva.

The Centre on Global Health Security is also planning further launches of the reports, one in Japan (for the Asian region) and another around the deliberations of the United Nations General Assembly and the post-2015 development agenda. The two years of work that culminated in these two reports will also be continued in further projects on ‘Universal Health Coverage’ and the ‘Global Health Architecture’.

Amina Mohammed, Special Adviser on Post 2015 Development, UN Secretariat, speaking at a conference on ‘International Cooperation in the 21st Century: Partnerships for Delivering the Post-2015 Agenda’ in May 2014.

Page 37: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

RumaMandalRuma Mandal is a senior research fellow in the International Law Programme at Chatham House. She has worked on international law issues with the UK government (as a legal adviser in the Foreign & Commonwealth Office) and with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

Her expertise includes international refugee law and international human rights law. Her work has involved the drafting of UNHCR guidelines on critical areas of international law relevant to the protection of refugees and stateless persons, litigation at the European Court of Human Rights and the negotiation of UN and EU legal instruments. She became a member of the Bar after reading law at the University of Cambridge.

Ruma’s appointment forms part of the International Law Programme’s expansion, facilitated by support from the Oak Foundation.

KevinOuttersonProfessor Kevin Outterson is a visiting fellow in the Centre on Global Health Security at Chatham House. He teaches health and corporate law at Boston University, where he co-directs the Health Law Programme.

He is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics; past chair of the Section on Law, Medicine & Health Care of the Association of American Law Schools; and a member of the Board of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics. He blogs on health policy issues. His research focuses on the organization and finance of the health sector, including global pharmaceutical markets, particularly antimicrobials.

Further reading:

What’s the World Health Organization For? Dr Charles Clift

Chatham House | 35

PeopleLaw and governance

Left to right: Professor Alison Holmes, Imperial College; Professor David Heymann, Head and Senior Fellow, Centre on Global Health Security; Professor Richard Smith, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; Osman Dar, Consultant Research Fellow, Centre on Global Health Security; and Armand Sprecher MD MPH, Médecins Sans Frontières, discussing ‘Ebola and Emerging Infectious Diseases: Measuring the Risk’ in May 2014.

Page 38: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

36 | Chatham House

HonoraryTreasurer’sReportyear to 31 March 2014

Chatham House had another challenging year financially in 2013/14, as it experienced the full-year impact of having taken a ten-year lease on the second floor of Ames House (next door to the Chatham House building in Duke of York Street) in 2012/13.

However, the overall net surplus for 2013/14 was £1,071,000, mainly as a result of growth in research income which reached £7,448,000, an increase of 41% over the previous year. This increase includes the annual adjustment to grant income as a result of implementing the Charities SORP which requires us to recognize revenues as they are received, rather than when they are spent. Research costs, as in 2012/13, increased by 15%, reflecting continuing investment in the expansion of capacity across all the research departments/programmes.

Membership subscriptions of £2,176,000 continued to grow, albeit at a slower pace than last year. Conferences enjoyed a successful year as a result of a restructuring, further investment in resources and a change away from organizing international roundtables to focusing purely on organizing large conferences. Revenues increased by 27%, with the overall surplus nearly doubling to £400,000 as it generated stronger returns from virtually all the conferences held in the year. Income from publications was again flat with the small increase in revenues from The World Today offsetting those from International Affairs. Income from fundraising and donations rose significantly, mainly owing to continued expansion of the William Pitt Group, and was helped by the implementation of a new tiered structure to reflect the increasing donation levels.

Expenditure on membership, meetings, the library, communications and publications increased by 20% to £2,263,000. This was mainly due to further investment in order to continue to meet the expanding needs of the institute, particularly in supporting the increased fundraising activities, development of a new website, the expansion of its digital content and publications. Support costs, net of recharges to the research programmes, increased by 14%, primarily as a result of the occupation of the second floor of Ames House at full rent and for a full year.

Investment income increased sharply over the previous year to £356,000. This included the increase in rental income from the ground floor of Ames House for the full year, from £28,000 to £173,000. Cash, partly in short-term deposits, increased by £952,000 during the year to

£3,937,000, helped by an inflow from the positive operating performance and tight working capital management. However, the average return on cash and short-term deposits averaged only 0.5% compared with 1.8% the year before. As a result non-cash investments of £796,000 were made during the year to increase yield, and at the year-end Chatham House held non-cash investments with a market value of £5,881,000, compared with £5,095,000 as at 31 March 2013. The small overall loss on investments reflected the drop in value of the emerging-market investments, partially offset by the increase in value of UK/global funds, and corresponded with the different market fortunes of each type of investment.

In respect of Ames House, a portion of the two loans taken out last year to help in the purchase of the ground floor was partially repaid during the year, reducing the outstanding total balances from £3,500,000 to £2,667,000. During the year the institute extended the lease on the basement to 999 years at a cost of £20,000. The institute still retains two ten-year leases (with five-year, tenant-only breaks) for the first and second floors, along with five-year options to acquire 999-year leases for either or both of these floors.

Total net assets as at 31 March 2014, excluding the value of Chatham House itself, were £11,154,000, compared with £10,083,000 as at 31 March 2013 – an increase of 10%.

The investments in the various lease acquisitions in Ames House have increased the financial commitments of the institute and these will continue to impact on the operating performance in the short term. However, arrangements are now firmly in place, with the establishment of the Second Century Initiative, to actively pursue a fundraising strategy with the aim of paying down the short-term loans and providing a sustainable financial reserve through endowments and other donations so that the institute can continue to grow and prosper into its second century.

Ed Smith

Page 39: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 37

Financialheadlinesyear to 31 March 2014

The Financial Headlines are extracted from the full unqualified audited group accounts, a copy of which is available to members on the website at www.chathamhouse.org. Alternatively copies may be obtained from Rhona Moir, Executive Assistant to the Finance Director, on telephone number +44 (0)20 7957 5700 or email [email protected]. Copies will also be available at the Annual General Meeting.

2014 2013 (£’000s) (£’000s) % incr

Total net assets at year-end* 11,154 10,083

Income

Membership subscriptions 2,176 2,084 4%

Research 7,448 5,286 41%

Conferences 1,253 984 27%

Investment return 356 238 50%

Publications 517 518 0%

Fundraising and donations 789 670 18%

Other 227 65 249%

12,766 9,845 Expenditure

Research 6,612 5,741 15%

Conferences 853 779 9%

Membership, meetings, library, communications and publications 2,263 1,891 20%

Support costs net of recharges to research 1,957 1,720 14%

11,685 10,131

Operational net income / (deficit) 1,081 (286)

Net investment (losses) / gains (10) 498

Net surplus for the year 1,071 212

Net cash inflow / (outflow) for the year 952 (1,658) *The Institute owns the freehold of Chatham House, the full value of which is not included in these figures.

Page 40: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

38 | Chatham House

Patron,PresidentsandCouncilat 30 June 2014

PanelofSeniorAdvisersandindividualsupportersat 30 June 2014

PatronHer Majesty The Queen

PresidentsRt Hon Lord Ashdown of Norton-sub-Hamdon GCMG KBE PC

Rt Hon Sir John Major KG, CH

Rt Hon Baroness Scotland QC

CouncilStuart Popham QC Chairman; Executive Committee; Finance Committee Vice Chairman EMEA Banking, Citigroup; former Senior Partner, Clifford Chance LLP

Rt Hon Sir Roderic Lyne KCMG Deputy Chairman, Executive Committee Member of the Iraq Inquiry Committee; Non-Executive Director, Petropavlovsk plc and JPMorgan Bank International

Ed Smith Hon Treasurer (ex-officio); Executive Committee; Finance Committee; Investment Committee Chairman, WWF-UK; Chairman, University of BirminghamDeputy Chairman, NHS England

Dr Mohammed Abdel-Haq Finance Committee; Investment Committee Businessman and Academic

Greg Baxter Global Head of Digital Strategy, Citigroup – New York. Former Partner and UK Board member at Booz & Company

Alistair Burnett Editor of The World Tonight, BBC R4

Ryan Gawn Director, Stratagem International; Head of International Communications, ActionAid International; former Strategic Campaigns Advisor, Department for International Development – Pakistan; former Strategic Communications Advisor, Foreign & Commonwealth Office, British High Commission, Pakistan; former Director EMEA of Penn, Schoen & Berland

Martin Giles US Technology Correspondent, The Economist

Sir Jeremy Greenstock GCMG Chairman, UN Association-UK; Chairman, Gatehouse Advisory Partners Ltd; Chairman, Lambert Energy Advisory Ltd; UK Ambassador to the UN (1998–2003)

Sir Richard Lambert Lead non-executive, Foreign & Commonwealth Office Supervisory Board; Chairman, Banking Standards Review Council Chancellor, University of Warwick Director-General, CBI (2006–11)

Bronwen Maddox Editor and Chief Executive, Prospect Publishing; Chief Foreign Commentator, The Times (2006–10)

Peter Montagnon Finance Committee Associate Director, Institute of Business Ethics Former Senior Investment Adviser, Financial Reporting Council

Vincent Neate Partner at KPMG – London; Chairman, Fight for Peace UK Limited; Trustee of From Babies with Love Limited

Alastair Newton Executive Committee Senior Political Analyst, Nomura International plc

Barbara Ridpath Director, St. Paul’s Institute; Non-Executive Director of National Australia Group Europe

Stuart Sinclair Finance Committee Non-Executive Director, Pru-Health, Provident Financial, TSB, QBE, Swinton

Xan Smiley Middle East and North Africa editor, The Economist

Robert Woodthorpe Browne MBE Chairman, International Relations Committee, Liberal Democrats; Treasurer, Bureau of Liberal International; CEO, Robert Browne and Partners Limited – International Reinsurance Consultants, Board Member, British German Association

Caroline Wyatt BBC Defence Correspondent

Panel of Senior Advisers The Panel of Senior Advisers was founded in 2008 to provide Chatham House with an experienced sounding board for our policy conclusions and help communicate our ideas at the highest levels in the UK and abroad.

Chairman: Rt Hon Sir John Major KG, CH UK Prime Minister (1990–97)

Ayman Asfari Group Chief Executive, Petrofac Ltd

Shumeet Banerji Non-Executive Director, Hewlett-Packard; Chief Executive Officer, Booz & Company (2008–12)

Lord Browne of Madingley President, Royal Academy of Engineering; Chief Executive, BP (1995–2007)

R Nicholas Burns Professor of the Practice of Diplomacy and International Politics, John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, US Department of State (2005–08); US Ambassador to NATO (2001–05)

Victor Chu Chairman, First Eastern Investment Group, Hong Kong

Tim Clark Senior Adviser to G3 and Fleming Family & Partners

Lord Davies of Abersoch CBE Partner and Vice Chairman, Corsair Capital; Minister for Trade and Industry (2009–10)

Ian Davis Chairman, Rolls-Royce; Non-Executive Director, BP and Johnson & Johnson; former Chairman and Worldwide Managing Director, McKinsey (2003–09)

Suzan Sabancı Dinçer CBE Chairman and Executive Board Member, Akbank

Mary Francis CBE Non-Executive Director, Centrica plc and Swiss Reinsurance Company; Director, Bank of England (2001–07)

Dame Clara Furse DBE External Member, Financial Policy Committee, Bank of England; Non-Executive Director, Nomura Holdings, Amadeus IT Holdings and Department for Work and Pensions, UK

James Gaggero Chairman, Bland Group Ltd

André Hoffmann Vice-Chairman, Board of Roche Holding Ltd

Rt Hon Lord Hurd of Westwell UK Foreign Secretary (1989–95)

Lord Jay of Ewelme Permanent Under-Secretary, Foreign Office (2002–06)

Sir Paul Judge Chairman, Schroder Income Growth Fund plc; Alderman, City of London

Page 41: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 39

Dame DeAnne Julius DCMG, CBE Independent Non-Executive Director of Deloitte (UK), Roche Holdings SA (Switzerland) and Jones Lang LaSalle (USA); former Chairman, Chatham House (2003–12)

Nemir Kirdar Founder, Executive Chairman and CEO, Investcorp

Caio Koch-Weser Vice Chairman, Deutsche Bank Group; Deputy Finance Minister for Germany (1999–2005)

Hon Marc E Leland President, Marc E Leland and Associates, USA; Co-Chairman, German Marshall Fund of the United States

Rachel Lomax Non-Executive Director, HSBC and Heathrow Airport Holdings; Deputy Governor, Monetary Policy, the Bank of England (2003–08)

Sir David Manning GCMG CVO British Ambassador to the United States (2003–07); foreign affairs and defence adviser to Prime Minister Tony Blair (2001–03)

Dame Judith Mayhew Jonas DBE Trustee, The Imperial War Museum; Chairman, New West End Company

Lubna Olayan Deputy Chairperson and CEO, Olayan Financing Company, Saudi Arabia

Sir Michael Rake Chairman, BT and EasyJet

Lord Robertson of Port Ellen Secretary General, NATO (1999–2003); UK Defence Secretary (1997–99)

Andrés Rozental Former Mexican diplomat; founding president of the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations; Chairman of ArcelorMittal Mexico; non-resident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution

Kevin Rudd Prime Minister of Australia (2007–10, 2013); Minister for Foreign Affairs (2010–12)

Daniel Sachs Chief Executive Officer, Proventus AB

Ron Sandler CBE Adviser, Palamon Capital Partners; former Executive Chairman of Northern Rock, Chief Operating Officer of NatWest Group and Chief Executive of Lloyd’s of London

John C Whitehead Founding Chairman, Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, USA; former Co-Chairman of Goldman Sachs

President’s CircleThe President’s Circle comprises individuals who enable Chatham House to undertake major initiatives, including the Academy for Leadership in International Affairs, research fellowships, new research streams and cross-institutional collaboration.

Ayman Asfari

Celia and Edward Atkin CBE

Tim Bunting

Richard Hayden

André Hoffmann

John C Whitehead

Director’s CircleSupport from members of the Director’s Circle allows the director to invest in timely and innovative research and thought leadership.

Garvin Brown IV

Dr Carlos Bulgheroni

Victor Chu

Sir Evelyn de Rothschild

Michael Hoffman

Timothy Jones

Nemir Kirdar

Hon Marc E Leland

Chris Rokos

Lionel Curtis GroupThrough their ongoing philanthropic commitment, individuals that comprise the Lionel Curtis Group offer discretionary support to the institute’s core research activities − ensuring its independence from any one funding source or agenda.

The Al Swaidi family

Gavin Boyle

Richard Bram

Stephen Brenninkmeijer

Sir Trevor Chinn CVO

Helen L Freeman

Ronald M Freeman

Luciano Gobbi

Bernard Groveman

Charles M Hale

Kaaren Hale

Sara Burch Khairallah

Karim Khairallah

Monika Machon

Jolana Vainio

Dr Petri Vainio

William Pitt Group The William Pitt Group, founded in 2009, comprises individuals committed to the success of the institute, and whose philanthropic support strengthens the institute’s independence.

Vahid Alaghband

David Archer

Petr Aven

Amit Bhatia

Pierre-Henri Denain

Glenn Earle

Ambassador Edward E Elson

Louis G Elson

Martin Fraenkel

Stephen Freidheim

Richard Karl Goeltz

Alexis Habib

Hon John G Heimann

Sir Joseph Hotung KBE

Farid Issa-El-Khoury

Reuben Jeffery III

Huw Jenkins

Hadi Kabalan

Donald Kramer

Andrew E Law

Martin Lovegrove

Roni Lovegrove

Michael R Lynch

Stephen Marquardt

Elizabeth McCaul

Morgan McKenney

Maryfrances Metrick

David Pearl

Stuart Popham QC

Paul Rivlin

Caspar Romer

Simon Rowlands

Jacob M Safra

Horacio Sánchez Caballero

Ron Sandler CBE

Dr Allen Sangines-Krause

Rafael Serrano

Richard W Slocum

Kit Tamkin

Robert Tomei

Pedro J Torres

John Vogelstein

Gareth Williams

Roger Wolf

Page 42: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

40 | Chatham House

FinancialSupport2013–14

Partners (at 30 June 2014)

Akbank

Asfari Foundation

BG Group

BP plc

Chevron Ltd

Crown Prince Court, Abu Dhabi

Department for International Development, UK

European Commission

ExxonMobil Corporation

Finmeccanica

Foreign & Commonwealth Office, UK

JETRO London

MAVA Foundation

Ministry of Defence, UK

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, United Arab Emirates

Nippon Foundation

Oak Foundation

Robert Bosch Foundation

Royal Dutch Shell

Statoil

Toshiba Corporation

Total Holdings UK Ltd

Key Project SponsorsAtkin Foundation

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

BHP Billiton International Services Ltd

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

British Red Cross

Catholic Organisation for Relief and Development Aid

Charities Aid Foundation

Climate & Development Knowledge Network

Climate and Land Use Alliance

Commonwealth Secretariat

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia

Disasters Emergency Committee

Economic and Social Research Council, UK

Embassy of the United States of America, London

EPOCH Foundation

Eranda Foundation

European Parliament

Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland

Federal Environment Agency, Germany

John D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation

Korea Foundation

Ministry of Finance, Japan

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Netherlands

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway

National Intelligence Council, United States of America

Nomura Foundation

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Headquarters

Open Society Foundations

Prudential plc

Revenue Watch Institute

Rockefeller Foundation

Skoll Global Threats Fund

Smith Richardson Foundation

Stavros Niarchos Foundation

Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency

Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

United Nations Trust Facility Supporting Cooperation on Arms Regulation

United States Agency for International Development

United States Institute for Peace

Research SupportersActionAid UK

African Barrick Gold plc

AIG Property Casualty

Al Tajir Trust

Alaco Ltd

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Anglo American plc

Arab Stabilization Plan

Areva SA

Association of Italian Banks

AstraZeneca plc

Atlantic Partnership

Banco Africano de Investimentos

Bank of England

Bechtel Ltd

Bovicor

Bowland Trust

Brazilian Development Bank

British Academy

British Council

BTG Pactual

Centre for Low Carbon Futures

Charles Hale

Chubu Electric Power Co Inc

Client Earth

Clifford Chance LLP

ConocoPhillips

Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation

Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Limited

DBJ Europe Limited

Debevoise and Plimpton LLP

Delonex Energy

Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada

Department of Health, UK

Department of National Defence, Canada

Diageo

Doughty Street Chambers

Eaton Vance Management

Elcano Royal Institute

Eni SpA

European Bank for Reconstruction & Development

European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries & Associations

European Forest Institute

Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Austria

Forest Trends

GlaxoSmithKline

GPW

Hess Corporation

HgCapital

Horacio Sanchez-Caballero

Humanity United

International Monetary Fund

IrishAid

Japan Institute of International Affairs

Japan Petroleum Exploration Co Ltd

JX

Konrad Adenauer Stiftung

Korea International Cooperation Agency

KPMG LLP

Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Science

Lockheed Martin UK

Lonrho plc

Lowy Institute for International Policy

Macquarie Group

Marathon Oil Corporation

Matthew Hurlock

Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Finland

Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Sweden

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Lithuania

Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, Netherlands

Mitsubishi Corporation

Mitsui & Co Europe plc

Morgan Stanley

Nedbank Ltd

Noble Energy Inc

Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre

Norwegian Refugee Council

Page 43: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 41

The Olayan Group

Overseas Development Institute

Pension Insurance Corporation Ltd

Petrofac

Raytheon

Rio Tinto plc

Robert Bosch Limited

Royal Navy

RWE Dea AG

Singapore National University

Standard Bank Plc

Standard Chartered Bank

StormHarbour Securities LLP

Sustainable Europe Research Institute

TRAFFIC International

Trans European Policy Studies Association

Tullow Oil plc

UNESCO

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

US Department of Defense

White Rose Energy Ventures

William Rice

Major Corporate Members (at 30 June 2014)

Accenture

AIG Asset Management

Amsterdam & Partners

Atkins

BAE Systems plc

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Barclays

BBC

BHP Billiton International Services Ltd

Bloomberg

British American Tobacco

British Army

BT Group plc

Caxton Asset Management

Citi

City of London

Clifford Chance LLP

CME Group

Control Risks

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, UK

Dexion Capital

DTCC (The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation)

The Economist

Eni SpA

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

FTI Consulting Ltd

GlaxoSmithKline

Goldman Sachs International

Herbert Smith Freehills LLP

HSBC Holdings plc

Huawei Technologies

Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales

Intesa Sanpaolo SpA

Japan Bank for International Cooperation

Jones Lang LaSalle

KPMG LLP

Kuwait Petroleum Corporation

LetterOne

Libra Group

Linklaters

Lockheed Martin UK

Marsh

MetLife

Mitsubishi Corporation

Morgan Stanley

Natixis

Nomura International plc

Oliver Wyman

PricewaterhouseCoopers

Rabobank International

Raytheon

Rio Tinto plc

Royal Bank of Scotland

Santander

Saudi Petroleum Overseas Ltd

Schlumberger Limited

Standard Chartered Bank

Stroz Friedberg

Sumitomo Corporation

Tesco

Thomson Reuters

United States of America, Embassy of the

Vodafone Group

Corporate Members (at 30 June 2014)

Afren

africapractice

Airbus Group

AKE Ltd

Albany Associates (International) Ltd

Allen & Overy LLP

Anglo American plc

APCO Worldwide

ArcelorMittal

Asahi Shimbun (Europe)

Aspen Insurance UK Limited

AstraZeneca plc

Avio Group

Aviva

AXA Investment Managers

Banca d’Italia

Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ

Bell Pottinger

BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd

Bland Group Ltd

British Council

Boeing UK

Cabinet Office

CBS News

CDC Group plc

Chivas Brothers

Chubb Investment Services Ltd

Chubu Electric Power Co Inc

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

CLP Holdings Limited

Coller Capital

Commonwealth Parliamentary Association

Commonwealth Secretariat

Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd

Crown Agents

CRU International Ltd

Daily Mail and General Trust plc

Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

De Beers Group Services UK Ltd

De La Rue plc

Delonex Energy

Department of Health, UK

Diageo

Diplomatic Academy of Montenegro

DP World

Energy Charter Secretariat

Energy Industries Council

Energy Intelligence Group

ES-KO

Eurasia Group

European Bank for Reconstruction & Development

European Investment Bank

European Parliament UK Office

First Magazine

G3 Good Governance Group

General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union

Genesis Investment Management LLP

The Group

The Guardian

Page 44: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

42 | Chatham House

FinancialSupport2013–14

HM Treasury

Hong Kong Economic & Trade Office

House of Commons Library

House of Lords Library

Indorama Services UK Ltd

INPEX

International Institute for Environment and Development

Investcorp International Ltd

Investec Asset Management

Invoke Capital

ITN

Jaguar Land Rover

Japan Oil, Gas & Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC)

JICA UK Office

JKX Oil & Gas

John Swire & Sons Ltd

KOKUSAI Asset Management Co Ltd

Kosmos Energy

Kroll

Krull Corp

Kuwait Investment Office

Kyodo News

League of Arab States

Macquarie Group

Marathon Oil Corporation

Maritime Asset Security & Training Ltd

Matheson & Co Ltd

Milbank

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Europe Ltd

Mitsui & Co Europe plc

Mizuho Bank

Mondelez International

Mondi Group

NEPAD Secretariat

Nexen Petroleum UK Ltd

NHK Japan Broadcasting Corporation

NIKKEI Inc

Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre

The Olayan Group

oltreradio.it

Orrick

Permira Advisers LLP

Petrofac Energy Developments

polestarglobal.com

Polish Institute of Diplomacy

Pool Re

Powerscourt

Premier Oil

Protection Group International

Prudential plc

Quakers in Britain

Risk Advisory Group

Rolls-Royce plc

RSA Insurance

Salamanca Risk Management

Sarasin & Partners LLP

SCA, Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget

Schroders Plc

Scottish Government

Shearman & Sterling LLP

Standard Life Group

Strategy&

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited

Tata Ltd

Telegraph Media Group

Thales

Tishman Speyer

Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)

Towers Watson

Tullow Oil plc

UBS

Vitol

Warburg Pincus LLC

Wilton Park

Wood Mackenzie

Yomiuri Shimbun

Embassy and High Commission Members (at 30 June 2014)

Algeria, Embassy of

Argentine Republic, Embassy of the

Armenia, Embassy of the Republic of

Australia, High Commission of

Austria, Embassy of

Azerbaijan, Embassy of the Republic of

Bahrain, Embassy of the Kingdom of

Belgium, Embassy of

Belize, High Commission of

Brazil, Embassy of

Bulgaria, Embassy of the Republic of

Canada, High Commission of

Chile, Embassy of

China, Embassy of the People’s Republic of

Costa Rica, Embassy of

Cyprus, High Commission for the Republic of

Czech Republic, Embassy of the

Denmark, Royal Embassy of

Dominican Republic, Embassy of the

Ecuador, Embassy of

Egypt, Embassy of the Arab Republic of

El Salvador, Embassy of

Estonia, Embassy of the Republic of

Ethiopia, Embassy of the Federal Democratic Republic of

Finland, Embassy of

France, Embassy of

Georgia, Embassy of

Germany, Embassy of the Federal Republic of

Gibraltar, Government of

Greece, Embassy of

Hungary, Embassy of

India, High Commission of

Indonesia, Embassy of the Republic of

Iraq, Embassy of the Republic of

Ireland, Embassy of

Israel, Embassy of

Italy, Embassy of

Japan, Embassy of

Jordan, Embassy of the Hashemite Kingdom of

Kazakhstan, Embassy of the Republic of

Korea, Embassy of the Republic of

Kuwait, Embassy of the State of

Latvia, Embassy of the Republic of

Libya, Embassy of the State of

Lithuania, Embassy of the Republic of

Luxembourg, Embassy of

Macedonia, Embassy of the Republic of

Malta, High Commission of

Mexico, Embassy of

Moldova, Embassy of the Republic of

Mongolia, Embassy of

Morocco, Embassy of the Kingdom of

Mozambique, High Commission for the Republic of

Netherlands, Embassy of the Kingdom of the

New Zealand, High Commission of

Norway, Royal Embassy of

Oman, Embassy of the Sultanate of

Pakistan, High Commission for the Islamic Republic of

Poland, Embassy of the Republic of

Portugal, Embassy of

Qatar, Embassy of the State of

Romania, Embassy of

Russian Federation, Embassy of the

Rwanda, High Commission for the Republic of

Saint Kitts & Nevis, High Commission of

Saudi Arabia, Embassy of the Royal Kingdom of

Serbia, Embassy of the Republic of

Seychelles, High Commission of the Republic of

Page 45: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 43

Sierra Leone, High Commission of

Singapore, High Commission for the Republic of

Slovak Republic, Embassy of the

Slovenia, Embassy of the Republic of

South Africa, High Commission for the Republic of

Spain, Embassy of

Sudan, Embassy of the Republic of

Sweden, Embassy of

Switzerland, Embassy of

Tanzania, High Commission of the United Republic of

Trinidad & Tobago, High Commission of the Republic of

Tunisia, Embassy of

Turkey, Embassy of the Republic of

Ukraine, Embassy of

United Arab Emirates, Embassy of the

Uruguay, Embassy of

Uzbekistan, Embassy of the Republic of

Venezuela, Embassy of the Bolivarian Republic of

Vietnam, Embassy of the Socialist Republic of

Yemen, Embassy of the Republic of

Zambia, High Commission for the Republic of

NGO Members (at 30 June 2014)

ActionAid UK

Amnesty International

British Red Cross

Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)

Concern Worldwide

European Interagency Security Forum (EISF)

International Committee of the Red Cross

International Medical Corps UK

Overseas Development Institute (ODI)

Saferworld

World Animal Protection

Academic Institutional Members (at 30 June 2014)

Brunel University – Department of Politics and History

ESCP Europe Business School

Goodenough College

King’s College London – Department of Political Economy

King’s College London – Department of War Studies

London School of Economics – Department of International Relations

Nanyang Technological University – S Rajaratnam School of International Studies

Osaka University – School of International Public Policy

Regent’s College – Department of International Relations

Regent’s College – European Business School

Richmond University – The American International University in London

Royal College of Defence Studies

School of Oriental and African Studies – Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy

University College London – Faculty of Laws and School of Public Policy

University of Bath – Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies

University of Buckingham – Department of Economics and International Studies

University of East Anglia – Department of Political, Social and International Studies

University of East Anglia – London Academy of Diplomacy

University of Kent – Department of Politics and International Relations

University of Portsmouth – Centre for European and International Studies Research

University of Sussex – School of Global Studies

University of Westminster – Department of Politics and International Relations

Webster University Geneva – Department of International Relations

Annual Fund DonorsIndividuals

John Ackroyd

Baha Bassatne

Greg Baxter

Gavin Boyle

Stephen Brenninkmeijer

Garvin Brown IV

Francesco Burelli

Eyup Sabri Carmikli

Lindsay Case

Sir Trevor Chinn CVO

Joseph Cook

Dr William Crawley

HE Dr Federico Alberto Cuello-Camilo

Nathan Danquah

Katherine Davies

Dr Emanuel de Kadt

Paul Etchells

Tom Fenton

Dame Clara Furse DBE

James Gaggero

Adrienne Gignoux

Martin Giles

Luciano Gobbi

Karin Greenhalgh

Bernard Halim

Dr Sam Hedayati

Rt Hon Lord Howe of Aberavon CH PC QC

Matt Huber

Rt Hon Lord Hurd of Westwell CH CBE PC

Majid Jafar

Nemir Kirdar

Sarah Laessig

Sir Richard Lambert

John Leech

Gerard Legrain

Simon Lerner

Anthony Loehnis

Rachel Lomax

Sir Roderic Lyne KCMG

Rt Hon Sir John Major KG CH

John Makin

Mladen Milinkovic

Dr Alexander Mirtchev

Peter Montagnon

Professor Roger Morgan

Angela Mosconi

Alex Nice

Yoshio Noguchi

Stuart Popham QC

Ambassador Andrés Rozental

Mustafa Sahin

Keith Salway

Howard Singleton

Richard Slater

Edward Smith

Pedro Solares

William Theuer

Monica Threlfall

Valerie Williams

John Williams

Corporate

BP plc

BT Group plc

Dominican Republic, Embassy of the

The John S Cohen Foundation

Sudan, Embassy of the Republic of

Turkey, Embassy of the Republic of

Page 46: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

44 | Chatham House

StaffandAssociateFellowsat 30 June 2014

DirectorDr Robin Niblett

Director’s Office

Kevin Steeves, Head of Director’s Office

Anna Dorant-Hayes, Executive Assistant to the Director

Claire Pearcey, Assistant, Director’s Office

Chatham House Distinguished Visiting Fellows

Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia (2013 and 2007–10)

Lord Williams of Baglan, International Trustee of the BBC, UN Under Secretary-General, Middle East (2006-11)

Chatham House Senior Consulting Fellow

Michael Keating, UN Deputy Envoy to Afghanistan (2010–12)

Area Studies and International Law Research DepartmentAlex Vines OBE, Research Director

Alis Martin, Executive Assistant to the Research Director for Area Studies & International Law

Africa

Alex Vines OBE, Head

Elizabeth Donnelly, Assistant Head

Dr Elisabete Azevedo-Harman, Research Fellow

Adjoa Anyimadu, Research Associate

Ahmed Soliman, Research Assistant

Chris Vandome, Research Assistant

Tighisti Amare, Programme Manager

Katherine Lawson, Parliamentary Outreach Officer

Daragh Thomas, Project Assistant

Associate Fellows:

Jeremy Astill-Brown

Knox Chitiyo

Bob Dewar CMG

Christina Katsouris

Dr Muzong Kodi

Dame Rosalind Marsden

Paul Melly

Jason Mosley

Dr Marc-Antoine Pérouse de Montclos

Ben Shepherd

Sola Tayo

Americas

Xenia Dormandy, US Project Director

Jacob Parakilas, Assistant Project Director

Sanford Henry, Visiting Fellow

Rory Kinane, Coordinator

Richard Gowing, Administrator

Kathleen McInnis, Research Consultant

Associate Fellows:

Professor Victor Bulmer-Thomas CMG, OBE

Dr Cath Collins

Professor Michael Cox

Dr Bates Gill

Dr Timothy Power

Julianne Smith

Bruce Stokes

Professor Peter Trubowitz

Dr Leslie Vinjamuri

Asia

Dr John Swenson-Wright, Head

Rosheen Kabraji, Assistant Head and Research Associate

Dr Gareth Price Senior Research Fellow

Dr Tim Summers, Senior Consulting Fellow

Chloe Sageman, Manager

Hameed Hakimi, Research Assistant

Joshua Webb, Administrator

Associate Fellows:

Professor Shaun Breslin

Professor Kerry Brown

Charu Lata Hogg

Dr Kun-Chin Lin

Simon Long

Professor Duncan McCargo

Dr Kirsten E Schulze

Dr Farzana Shaikh

Dr Chris Smith

Matt Waldman

Sir David Warren

Rod Wye

Dr Michal Meidan

Europe

Quentin Peel, Mercator Senior Fellow

Thomas Raines, Manager and Research Associate

Associate Fellows:

Professor Iain Begg

Professor Maurice Fraser

Dr Matthew Goodwin

Fadi Hakura

Professor Anand Menon

Professor Richard G Whitman

Middle East and North Africa

Dr Claire Spencer, Head

Jane Kinninmont, Deputy Head and Senior Research Fellow

Neil Quilliam, Senior Research Fellow

Leonie Northedge, Research Associate

Doris Carrion, Research Assistant

Helen Twist, Manager

Sophie Grant, Coordinator

Jamil De Dominicis, Coordinator

Saad Aldouri, Administrator

Associate Fellows:

Hayder al-Khoei

Dr Maha Azzam (on sabbatical)

David Butter

Dr Kristian Coates Ulrichsen

Dr Sara Bazoobandi

Sir Richard Dalton

Jon Marks

Professor Yossi Mekelberg

Dr Christopher Phillips

Sir Tom Phillips

Nadim Shehadi

Russia and Eurasia

James Nixey, Head

Dr Andrew Monaghan, Senior Research Fellow

Orysia Lutsevych, Research Fellow

L’ubica Polláková, Coordinator

Associate Fellows:

Annette Bohr

Professor Julian Cooper OBE

Keir Giles

Professor Philip Hanson OBE

Dr Bobo Lo

John Lough

Professor Neil MacFarlane

Professor Marie Mendras

Dr Arkady Moshes

Professor Richard Sakwa

James Sherr

Dr Lilia Shevtsova

Sir Andrew Wood

International Law

Ruma Mandal, Senior Research Fellow

Catherine Wanjiku, Administrator

Associate Fellows:

Dr Louise Arimatsu

David Bentley

Joanne Foakes

Dr Wim Muller

Sonya Sceats

Elizabeth Wilmshurst CMG

Miša Zgonec-Rožej

Page 47: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 45

Energy, Environment and Resources Research DepartmentRob Bailey, Acting Research Director

Professor Paul Stevens, Distinguished Fellow

Antony Froggatt, Senior Research Fellow

Alison Hoare, Senior Research Fellow

Felix Preston, Senior Research Fellow

Glada Lahn, Senior Research Fellow

Shane Tomlinson, Senior Research Fellow

Jaakko Kooroshy, Research Fellow

Siân Bradley, Research Associate

Gemma Green (on maternity leave) / Anna Stapleton, Department Manager

Jens Hein, Coordinator

Owen Grafham, Coordinator

Laura Wellesley, Research Associate

Rachel Shairp, Coordinator

Adelaide Glover, Project Coordinator

Associate Fellows:

William Blyth

Duncan Brack

Oli Brown

Charles Emmerson

Alex Evans

Dr Robert Falkner

Professor David Grey

Kirsty Hamilton

Paul Hohnen

Dr Valérie Marcel

Paul McMahon

John V Mitchell

Dr Keun-Wook Paik

Cleo Paskal

Walt Patterson

Jade Saunders

Elizabeth Wilson

Farhana Yamin

International Economics Research DepartmentDr Paola Subacchi, Research Director

Sarah Okoye, Executive Assistant

Stephen Pickford, Senior Research Fellow

Julia Fung-Yee Leung, Julius Fellow

André Astrow, Senior Consultant and Project Director

Shigeki Mitomo, Visiting Fellow

Myriam Zandonini, Research Associate

Dr Davide Tentori, Research Associate

Helena Huang, Research Assistant

Effie Theodoridou, Administrator

Associate Fellows:

Professor Benjamin Cohen

Paul van den Noord

John Nugée

Professor Jim Rollo

Professor Catherine Schenk

Dr Mina Toksoz

International Security Research DepartmentDr Patricia Lewis, Research Director

James de Waal, Senior Fellow

Heather Williams, Research Fellow

Caroline Baylon, Research Associate

Sasan Aghlani, Research Assistant

Hannah Bryce, Programme Manager

Florence Boafo, Coordinator

Rachel Kean, Coordinator

Associate Fellows:

Irma Arguello

Alyson JK Bailes

Robert Baxter

Nomi Bar-Yaacov

John Borrie

Steven Bowns

Dr Andrew Dorman

Dr Bill Durodié

Sharad Joshi

Dr Claudia Hoffmann

Elli Kytömäki

Dr Stuart Gordon (joint with Centre on Global Health Security)

Keir Giles

Professor Robert Jackson

David Livingstone

Iain Mathewson

Michael Moodie

Anita Nilsson

Professor Joanna Spear

Col Philip Wilkinson (retd) OBE MPHIL

Centre on Global Health SecurityProfessor David L Heymann CBE, Head and Senior Fellow

Dr Charles Clift, Senior Consulting Fellow

Professor David Harper, Senior Consulting Fellow

Professor Nigel Lightfoot, Senior Consulting Fellow

Lt Gen Louis Lillywhite (retd), Senior Consulting Fellow

Professor Kevin Outterson, Visiting Fellow

Dr Osman Dar, Consulting Fellow

Jon Lidén, Consulting Fellow

Emma Ross, Consultant

Claire Muñoz Parry, Manager

Robert Ewers, Coordinator

Associate Fellows:

Professor David Fidler

Professor Anna George

Dr Stuart Gordon (joint with International Security Department)

Professor Ilona Kickbusch

Dr Khalid Koser

Dr Heidi Larson

Dr Kelley Lee

Professor John-Arne Røttingen

Dr Simon Rushton

Professor David Salisbury

Dr Devi Sridhar

Professor David Stuckler

Academy for Leadership in International AffairsXenia Dormandy, Acting Dean

Andrew Swan, Manager

Alis Martin, Coordinator

Catherine Wanjiku, Administrator

Academy Fellows:

Abdullah Ali, Academy Asfari Fellow

George Mchedlishvili, Academy Robert Bosch Fellow

Akio Miyajima, Visiting Senior Academy Fellow

Dr Fida Shafi, Academy Asfari Senior Fellow

Nouar Shamout, Academy Asfari Senior Fellow

Guoyu Wang, Academy Senior Fellow

Ilya Zaslavskiy, Academy Robert Bosch Fellow

Page 48: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

46 | Chatham House

StaffandAssociateFellowsat 30 June 2014

Communications and Publishing DepartmentKeith Burnet, Communications and Publishing Director

Communications Outreach

Nicola Norton, Media Relations Manager

Francis Grove-White, Media and Government Relations Officer

Conor Quinn, Social Media and Communications Officer

Website and Digital Development

Josie Hock, Head

Agnieszka Grychowska, Website and Digital Development Manager

Publishing and Online Content

Amanda Moss, Head

Margaret May, Editor, Publications

Nicolas Bouchet, Deputy Editor (Research), Publications

Laura Neff, Publications Assistant

Nicola Roper, Audio/Video Producer

Jason Naselli, Website and Project Manager

Lisa Toremark, Editorial Coordinator, Online

Kate O’Sullivan, Assistant Editor, Online

International Affairs

Caroline Soper, Editor

Krisztina Csortea, Book Reviews Editor

Heidi Pettersson, Assistant Editor

The World Today

Alan Philps, Editor

Agnes Frimston, Deputy Editor

External Relations DepartmentHarry Charlton, External Relations Director

Harriet Rimbault, Assistant to External Relations Director

Individual Membership and Development

Sam Palmer, Head

Annabel Walton, Donor Relations Manager

Keren Elton, Individual Membership Assistant

Research Grants

Rose Abdollahzadeh, Research Grants Manager

Julia Maj, Research Grants Coordinator

Corporate Relations

Sophie Eggar, Head (on maternity leave)

Janine Hirt, Acting Head

Alex Tucker, Officer

Elizabeth Plumb, Coordinator

Morgan Mixon, Administrator

Events

Catherine O’Keeffe, Deputy Director, Events

Alison Archer, Head of Conferences

Kamil Hussain, Conference Developer

George Woodhams, Conference Developer

Georgina Wright, Senior Conference Manager

Belinda Ritchie, Conference Manager

Laurel Louden, Conference Administrator

Emma Sullivan, Events and Strategic Planning Manager

Sarah Christie, Events Coordinator

Stephanie Sproson, Events Coordinator

Linda Bedford, Events Administrator

Esther Stoffels, Marketing Manager

Zara Berry, Senior Marketing Officer

Alex Jackson, Direct Marketing Assistant

House and PersonnelDawn Margrett, Assistant Director

Rhona Moir, Executive Assistant to Assistant Director

Patricia Lewis-Goodridge/Florence Boafo, Bookings Coordinator

Sonia Kinghorne, Receptionist

Charag Ali/John Edusei, House Manager

Paul Etheridge, Building Maintenance

Ian Los, Despatch Head

Ray Sutlieff, Despatch Assistant/Relief Receptionist

Louise Evans, Catering Manager

Samir Zid, Chef

Joanne Smith, Catering Assistant

Debbie Street, Catering

Kim Thomson, Catering

Finance and Technical SystemsPaul Curtin, Finance Director and Secretary to Council

Rhona Moir, Executive Assistant to Finance Director

Stephen Martin, Finance Manager

Mahendra Kothari, Financial Accountant

Sarah Adebambo, Management Accountant

Valerie Ormes, Finance Officer

Leanne Pope, Finance Officer

Michael Farrell, Database Manager

Martin Kennedy/Reece McFarlane, IT Help Desk

Library and Information ServicesDavid Bates, Manager

Malcolm Madden, Research Liaison Librarian

Anna Brynolf, Digital Resources Librarian

Many programmes and departments are supported throughout the year by temporary staff, volunteers and interns. Chatham House is extremely grateful for their contribution.

Page 49: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

Chatham House | 47

Page 50: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

48 | Chatham House

Cover image: At the ‘Hands of Cooperation’ camp, or Alta’awan, just inside the Syrian border. Photographer Andree Kaiser/MCT via Getty Images.

Chatham House is independent of government, does not owe allegiance to any political party and is precluded by its Charter from having an institutional view. Opinions expressed in publications or at meetings are those of the authors and speakers concerned.

Written by Chatham House.

Designed by TRUE www.truedesign.co.uk

Photography by Chatham House and Getty Images.

Printed by Park Communications on FSC® certified Splendorgel paper using vegetable oil based ink.

The Royal Institute of International Affairs Chatham House 10 St James’s Square London SW1Y 4LE T +44 (0)20 7957 5700 F +44 (0)20 7957 5710 E [email protected]

Membership Information T +44 (0)20 7314 3631 – Individual T +44 (0)20 7957 5734 – Corporate E [email protected]

Members Events T +44 (0)20 7314 3638 E [email protected]

Conference Unit T +44 (0)20 7957 5729 E [email protected]

Room Hire T +44 (0)20 7314 2764 E [email protected]

Media Enquiries/Press Office T +44 (0)20 7957 5739 E [email protected]

Contact

Page 51: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

When a meeting, or part thereof, is held underthe Chatham House Rule, participants are freeto use the information received, but neither theidentity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), northat of any other participant, may be revealed.

Page 52: Chatham House Annual Review 2013-14 pdf | 4.96 MB

The Royal Institute of International Affairs Chatham House 10 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LE T +44 (0)20 7957 5700 F +44 (0)20 7957 5710 [email protected] www.chathamhouse.org

Charity Registration Number: 208223

Independent thinking since 1920