chatper 10
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
1/171
Analyzing GeographicDistributions
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
2/171
Transplant Experiments
Moving individuals of a species to anunoccupied area and determining whether theycan survive and reproduce in the newenvironment
Some organisms can survive but cannotreproduce in an area; follow transplantexperiments for at least one generation!
Useful for determining whether the limitation ondistribution of a species results from theinaccessibility of an area
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
3/171
Transplant Experiments
A control is necessary to provideinformation on the effects of handling andtransplanting individual plants or animals.
Includes transplants done within thedistribution
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
4/171
Transplant Experiments
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
5/171
Transplant Experiments
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
6/171
Transplant Experiments
Transplant successful
The potential range of a species is largerthan its actual range.
Possibly cannot move into its potentialrange or lacks suitable means to do so;problems with dispersal
Can move into new areas, but does not dothat; study mechanism of habitatselection
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
7/171
Transplant Experiments
Transplant unsuccessful
Excluded by abiotic factors or biotic interactionwith other species
Negative effects of predators, parasites,competitors
Positive effect of interdependent species within
the actual range May be tested by conducting transplant
experiments with protective devices (caging)
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
8/171
Transplant Experiments
If other species do not set the limits on theactual range, some physical or chemicalfactors may!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
9/171
Transplant Experiments
Disastrous when pests are introduced tonew areas
Indiscriminate transplanting of organismscontains all the seeds of ecologicaldisaster!
Most governments have stringent rulesprohibiting the importation of plants andanimals from other regions.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
10/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
11/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
12/171
DispersalMovement of Organisms
Ecological process affecting distributions
Of primary interest to ecologists andbiogeographers
Biogeography is the study of thegeographical distribution of life on Earth andthe rationale behind these distributions.
Biogeographers are interested in historicalchanges in distribution of animals and plants.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
13/171
Dispersal
One of the least studied aspects ofpopulation dynamics: the branch ofpopulation ecology concerned with factors
influencing the expansion, decline ormaintenance of populations
Dispersal can increase or decrease local
population densities. Immigration: moving in
Emigration: moving out
Migration: seasonal movements
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
14/171
Modes of Dispersal
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
15/171
Modes of Dispersal
Three modes of dispersal according toPielou (1979):
Diffusion
Jump dispersal
Secular dispersal
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
16/171
Modes of DispersalDiffusion
Gradual movement of a population acrosshospitable terrain for a period of severalgenerations
Example: cane toad in Australia
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
17/171
Modes of DispersalDiffusion
Cane Toad (Bufo marinus)
Native to Central and South America fromMexico to Brazil
Widely introduced in the 1930s to islands
in the Caribbean and the Pacific becauseit was believed to control scarab beetles,pests of sugar cane!
Brought to Queensland, Australia, in 1935,where it failed to control any insect pests;became a pest itself!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
18/171
Modes of DispersalDiffusion
Cane Toad (Bufo marinus)
Eat almost anything, but mainly insects
Reproduce prolifically; 8,000 to 35,000 eggstwice a year!
Toxic to many potential predators; some speciesof snakes are developing resistance to the toxin!
All forms of the toad poisonous, as they contain
a poison that causes cardiac arrest in humans Humans eating cane toad eggs have died from
the toxin!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
19/171
Modes of DispersalDiffusion
Cane Toad (Bufo marinus)
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
20/171
Modes of DispersalDiffusion
Cane Toad (Bufo marinus)
Cane toads have been moving west (fromQueensland) at ca. 40 km per year.
Individual marked toads have moved up to1.8 km per night, along roads (convenienthabitat corridors for their rapid spread).
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
21/171
Modes of DispersalJump Dispersal
Movement of individual organisms acrosslarge distances followed by the successfulestablishment of a population in the new
area Occurs in a short period of time, during the
life of an individual
Usually occurs across unsuitable terrain Example: island colonization; human
introductions (assisted jump dispersal)
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
22/171
Modes of DispersalSecular Dispersal
Occurs in evolutionary time and is rarely ofimmediate interest for ecologists working inecological time
If diffusion occurs in evolutionary time, thespecies undergoes extensive evolutionarychange in the process.
Geographic range of a secularly dispersing
species expands over geologic time, but naturalselection causes the migrants to diverge fromthe ancestral population.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
23/171
Modes of DispersalSecular Dispersal
At the end of the Ice Age, as glaciers retreatedfrom Europe and North America, one of the mostspectacular colonizations occurred.
In 1899, Charles Reid, a British botanist, wasinterested in how trees re-colonized the BritishIsles after the Ice Age.
From the melting of the ice around 10,000 years
ago, till the British Isles were invaded by theRomans in AD 50, trees such as oak expandedtheir range 1000 km northward!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
24/171
Modes of DispersalSecular Dispersal
Oaks mature at age 10 50 years, and seedsare dropped at an average of 30 meters fromparents.
If a tree produces a million seeds per generationover 300 generations and the seeds disperse 30meters with each generation, the simple diffusionmodel predicts a range extension of 36 km!
Reids Paradox: Observed large discrepancybetween the rapid rate of movement of trees re-colonizing areas at the end of the Ice Age andthe observed slow dispersal rate of tree seedsspreading by diffusion.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
25/171
Seed Dispersal
Tree seed dispersal may be mapped byputting out seed traps at differentdistances from the parent tree or by
mapping the location of seedlingsproduced by isolated trees.
S d Di l
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
26/171
Seed DispersalCornus controversa, a deciduous tree
Mean seed dispersal = 6.7 meters
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
27/171
Seed Dispersal
Average seed dispersal distances fortwelve species of temperate trees in theSouthern Appalachians estimated to be 4
34 meters
Too small to account for recolonization bysimple diffusion after the ice melted!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
28/171
Seed Dispersal
The answer to Reids paradox lies in haphazard,long range dispersal of seeds by winds andanimals!
Colonization rates are not driven by the meandispersal distance but by extreme dispersalevents!
Extreme dispersal events very difficult to record
because less than one in 10,000 seeds ends upbeing blown a long distance by the wind ortransported a great distance by an animal!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
29/171
Dispersal
May be affected by barriers: geographicfeatures that hinder or prevent dispersalacross it, producing isolation
Barriers not always the factor limitinggeographic ranges!
Introduced species may be unable to
survive in a new area!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
30/171
Dispersal
Humans have moved many speciesaround the globe during the past 200years, often with disastrous
consequences!
Failure to establish a species rarelystudied!
Accidental introductions only recordedwhen successful!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
31/171
Dispersal
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
32/171
Dispersal
Continental bird introductions successful10 to 30% of the time!
Success rate generally higher on islands!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
33/171
Dispersal
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
34/171
Dispersal
Tens Rule (Williamson and Fitter, 1996):The rule of thumb that 1 in 10 speciesimported into a country becomes
introduced, 1 in 10 of the introducedspecies become established and 1 in 10 ofthe established species become pests.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
35/171
Dispersal
According to the Tens Rule, the transition fromone state to another has a probability of ca. 10%(5 to 20%).
Rule does not apply to all taxonomic groups:
Vertebrates introduced between Europe and NorthAmerica Success at each step ca. 50%
Aquatic species in Europe 63% of introductionsbecome established.
Fewer than 10% of imported aquatic species become
introduced in Europe. Of the established non-native plants in the USA, 6
13% have invaded natural areas.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
36/171
Dispersal
Imported species are often successfulenough to encourage strong quarantineactions for all groups!
Species introduced by humans constitutespectacular examples of dispersal and itseffect on distribution!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
37/171
DispersalZebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha)
Fingernail sized mussel native to theCaspian Sea
Forms dense clusters on hard surfaces
and grows rapidly Discovered in 1988 in Lake St. Claire,
near Detroit, MI
Possibly introduced ca. 1985, by a shipfrom a freshwater port in Europe throughballast water
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
38/171
DispersalZebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha)
Must have grown unnoticed for ca. 3years; noticed when they reached adensity of 750,000 individuals per square
meter!
Blocked water intakes of city watersystems, electrical power stations,
industrial facilities
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
39/171
DispersalZebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha)
Rapid spread in river systems ofcentral USA
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
40/171
Efficient filter feeders; positive effect onwater quality
Make the water clearer; increase thegrowth of rooted aquatic plants
Feed on phytoplankton, thus depressingpopulations of zooplankton
Smother native clam species by colonizingany available hard surface
DispersalZebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha)
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
41/171
Why Dispersal?
Expanding populations
Climate change
Food availability
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
42/171
Dispersal of Expanding Populations
Collared doves(Streptopeliadecaocto) spread from
Turkey into Europeafter 1900.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
43/171
Dispersal of Expanding Populations
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
44/171
Dispersal of Expanding Populations
Dispersal began suddenly:
Not influenced by humans
Took place in small jumps at around 45km/yr
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
45/171
Dispersal of Expanding Populations
R id Ch i R
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
46/171
Rapid Changes in Response toClimate Change
Organisms began to spread northwardabout 16,000 years ago following retreat ofglaciers and warming climate.
Evidence found in preserved pollen in lakesediments
Movement rate 100 - 400 m/yr
R id Ch i R
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
47/171
Rapid Changes in Response toClimate Change
Di l i R Ch i
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
48/171
Dispersal in Response to ChangingFood Supply
Holling (1959) observed numericalresponses to increased prey availability.
Increased prey density led to increased
density of predators.
Individuals move into new areas inresponse to higher prey densities.
Di l i R t Ch i
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
49/171
Dispersal in Response to ChangingFood Supply
Korpimaki and Norrdahl (1991) conducteda ten-year study on voles and theirpredators.
Di l i R t Ch i
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
50/171
Dispersal in Response to ChangingFood Supply
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
51/171
Dispersal in Rivers and Streams
One of the most distinctive features ofstream and river environments is current,the downstream flow of water.
Why doesnt the current eventually
wash all stream/river organisms out tothe sea?
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
52/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
53/171
Dispersal in Rivers and Streams
Muller (1954, 1974) hypothesized thatpopulations are maintained via dynamicinterplay between downstream and
upstream dispersal. Colonization Cycle
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
54/171
Dispersal in Rivers and Streams
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
55/171
Dispersal in Rivers and Streams
A wave of migrating snailsin the Rio Claro, Costa
Rica
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
56/171
Dispersal in Rivers and Streams
Close up ofmigrating snails
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
57/171
Dispersal
Problems associated with studyingdispersal Most dispersals probably go unnoticed as
detailed distribution is known for so fewspecies; i.e. dispersal of individuals amongdifferent parts of a species range may beoccurring very often.
Organisms may disperse to a new area butnot colonize it because of biotic or physicalfactors.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
58/171
Dispersal
Genetic process affecting geographicdifferentiation
Colonization successful
Dispersal results in gene flow. Genetic structure of the population is affected.
Founder effect
Occurs when dispersing individuals are not a random
sample of the population
Newly established population genetically quite distinctfrom the original population!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
59/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
60/171
Dispersal
Mosquitoes (and other insectspecies) may be transportedlong distances by wind.
Studying the dispersal ofdisease-carrying mosquitoesimportant as the distances they
disperse determine wherecontrol work must be done! Malaria control zones in tropical
countries typically use a 2 kmbarrier surrounding humanhabitations as mosquitoes
rarely move that far! Salt marsh mosquitoes havebeen captured on oil rigs 74106 km away from shore inLouisiana and around 96 kminland in Australia!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
61/171
C l i ti d E ti ti
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
62/171
Colonization and ExtinctionThe Case of Krakatau
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
63/171
Colonization and Extinction
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
64/171
Colonization and ExtinctionMarsupials
Terrestrial mammals other than bats do noteasily cross saltwater barriers.
Marsupials Kangaroos, Possums andOpossums became isolated in South America
and Australia early in the Tertiary (60 millionyears ago). New Zealand had no native marsupials or other
land mammals except for two species of bats atthe time the first Europeans arrived!
Of the placental mammals, only rodents andbats were able to colonize Australia beforehumans arrived!
Colonization and Extinction
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
65/171
Colonization and ExtinctionMarsupials
Colonization and Extinction
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
66/171
Colonization and ExtinctionMarsupials
South America was isolated from NorthAmerica by a water gap across CentralAmerica through most of the Tertiary!
Became connected to North America ca.2million years ago! Mammals dispersed inboth directions!
Many South American mammals becamereplaced by North American ones.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
67/171
Colonization and Extinction
Difficult access, limited dispersal power ofdifferent species and adaptive radiationhas produced island faunas and floras of
unique nature! Plants and animals of Hawaii
The Galapagos islands
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
68/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
69/171
Colonization and Extinction
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
70/171
Colonization and ExtinctionAntarctic Beech (Nothofagusspp.)
Nothofagusseeds heavy; poorly adaptedfor jump dispersal
Species probably spread slowly overland
by diffusion and have been stopped by thesea
Present distribution a byproduct of
continental drift!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
71/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
72/171
Habitat Selection
Some organisms choose not occupy all theirpotential range; they choose not to live in certainhabitats!
Habitat: part of the biosphere where a species
can live either temporarily or permanently Habitat selection is one of the most poorlyunderstood ecological processes!
Typically thought with respect to animals
Plants show habitat preferences, but cannotactively move from one habitat to another; seedsor spores arrive at a habitat by dispersal andmay survive or die!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
73/171
Habitat Selection
Assuming that animals cannot liveeverywhere, natural selection will favor thedevelopment of sensory systems that can
recognize suitable habitats! Look at places from the animals point of
view! Areas very similar to a human
observer may be very different to amosquito!
Habitat Selection
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
74/171
Habitat SelectionAnopheline Mosquitoes
Important disease vectors Ecology well studied because of the practical
problems of malaria eradication
Each species usually associated with aparticular type of breeding sites
Large areas of water seem to be free ofAnophelesmosquitoes! Why?
The female mosquito selects the site in which to layits eggs!
Selection not only based on whether the water issuitable for larval growth and development!
Habitat Selection
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
75/171
Habitat SelectionAnopheline Mosquitoes
In southern India, Anopheles culicifacies, amalaria vector, does not occur in rice fieldsafter the plants grow to a height of 12
inches or more! Those older rice fieldssupport two other species of Anopheles.
If the eggs of Anopheles culicifaciesaretransplanted into old rice fields, the larvae
survived and produced a normal numberof adults!
Habitat Selection
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
76/171
Habitat SelectionAnopheline Mosquitoes
Absence of this species due to theselection of oviposition sites by females
Limiting factor is the physical barrier posed
by rice plants of a certain height
Vertical bamboo strips and glass rodsplaced vertically in small ponds also
deterred female mosquitoes from layingeggs!
Habitat Selection
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
77/171
Habitat SelectionAnopheline Mosquitoes
Female mosquitoes oviposit while flying.
Perform a hovering dance, never touchingthe water, but remaining ca. 5 10 cm
above it
Physical obstructions prevent femalemosquitoes from performing the dance
freely.
E l i f H bi P f
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
78/171
Evolution of Habitat Preference
Natural selection favors individuals that use thehabitats in which the most progeny can beraised successfully.
Natural selection may act directly upon the
behaviors that result in habitat choice or it mayselect for individuals that have the capacity tolearn which habitat is appropriate
Populations in marginal habitats may besustained only by a net outflow of individualsfrom preferred habitats.
E l i f H bi P f
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
79/171
Evolution of Habitat Preference
Directional selection for specifichabitat features that increase the
probability of successful nesting
In birds, survivaland reproductiondepends on nest
site choices! May be the basis
for nest sitepreference!
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
80/171
Evolution of Habitat Preference
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
81/171
Evolution of Habitat PreferenceBlue-Winged Teal (Anas discors)
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
82/171
Evolution of Habitat Preference
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
83/171
Evolution of Habitat PreferenceFretwell 1972
Individuals free tomove into anyhabitat without anyconstraint; Ideal
Free Distribution
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
84/171
Evolution of Habitat Preference
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
85/171
Evolution of Habitat PreferenceFretwell 1972
Model predicts that when density is high,both good and poor habitats will haveequal suitabilities but different densities!
Individuals will be crowded in the mostsuitable habitat and occur at lowerdensities in the less suitable habitats.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
86/171
E l ti f H bit t P f
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
87/171
Evolution of Habitat Preference
Problems arise whenever habitats change. We create and destroy new habitats; some
species have responded by invading andcolonizing our habitats (rats, mosquitoes).
We do not know how rapidly organisms canchange the genetic and behavioral machinerythat results in habitat selection!
Organisms with fixed, genetically programmedhabitat selection may require considerable timeto evolve the necessary machinery that willenable them to select a new suitable habitat.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
88/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
89/171
E ploitati e Interactions
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
90/171
Exploitative Interactions
Exploitation: Interaction betweenpopulations that enhances fitness of oneindividual while reducing fitness of the
exploited individual Predators kill and consume other organisms. Parasites live on host tissue and reduce host
fitness, but do not generally kill the host.
Parasitoid is an insect larva that consumesthe host.
Pathogens induce disease.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
91/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
92/171
Limitation by Predators
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
93/171
Limitation by Predators
Work on intertidal invertebrates hasprovided classic examples of the influenceof predation on distribution; example:
Kitching and Ebling (1967) Studies conducted at Lough Ine, an arm of
the sea on the south coast of Ireland
Limitation by Predators
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
94/171
yKitching and Ebling 1967
The common mussel (Mytilus edulis) Widespread species on exposed rocky coasts
in southern Ireland and throughout the world
Small mussels (less than 25 mm long)abundant on the exposed rocky Atlantic coastbut rare or absent within Lough Ine and moreprotected parts of the coast
Large mussels (30 70 mm long) abundant inthe northern end of the lough!
Limitation by Predators
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
95/171
yKitching and Ebling 1967
Transferred pieces of rock with Mytilusattached from various parts of the lough toothers
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
96/171
Limitation by Predators
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
97/171
yKitching and Ebling 1967
Small Mytilusdisappeared quickly whentransplanted anywhere in Lough Ine butdid not disappear if transplanted to the
open coast. The rapid loss suggests predators are
responsible.
Limitation by Predators
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
98/171
yKitching and Ebling 1967
Large
mussels
Limitation by Predators
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
99/171
yKitching and Ebling 1967
Large Mytilusnaturally occur in thesouthwestern part of the lough.
Disappeared rapidly from most stations,
except places where they occurrednaturally
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
100/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
101/171
Limitation by Predators
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
102/171
Limitation by Predators
Situation possibly more complex;exploitative interactions weave populationsinto a web of relationships that defies easy
generalization. Predator may feed on a variety of prey
species.
Each prey species may in turn be fed onby several predatory species.
Limitation by Predators
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
103/171
Limitation by Predators
Prey may restrict distribution of itspredator!
If the prey is to restrict the predators
range, the predator must be veryspecialized and feed on one or twospecies of prey only.
Specialist or monophagous predator
(most common among insects notvertebrates)
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
104/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
105/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
106/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
107/171
Disease and Parasitism
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
108/171
Native Bird Fauna of Hawaii
Native birds common atelevation >1500 m
Introduced birdscommon at elevation
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
109/171
Native Bird Fauna of Hawaii
Malaria parasite mostcommon at intermediateelevations
Disease and Parasitism
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
110/171
Native Bird Fauna of Hawaii
The main malaria vector, the mosquito Culexquinquefasciatus, is most common in lowland areas.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
111/171
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
112/171
Disease and Parasitism
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
113/171
Native Bird Fauna of Hawaii
Extinction of native bird fauna of Hawaii intwo pulses
After 1900:
Extinction due to avian malaria Birds that went extinct at this time lived in the mid-
elevation forests where malaria parasites weremost prevalent.
Native birds retreated to high elevation forestswhere mosquitoes are rare.
Effect of climate change?
Allelopathy
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
114/171
Allelopathy
Some organisms, particularly plants, maybe limited in local distribution by poisonsor antibiotics, also called allelopathic
agents. The action of penicillin among
microorganisms is a classic!
Allelopathy
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
115/171
Allelopathy
Soil sickness due to toxic secretions fromplants
For a piece of ground continuously planted
in one crop, the yields decrease andcannot be improved by additional fertilizer!
Detrimental effects of plants growing with
one another grass and apple trees!
Allelopathy
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
116/171
Allelopathy
Allelopathy
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
117/171
Allelopathy
Wheat has good potential for weed controlin agricultural landscapes.
Wheat seedlings reduce root growth in the
annual ryegrass (a common weed).
Allelopathy
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
118/171
Allelopathy
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
119/171
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
120/171
Competition
Concept so familiar in capitalist societies! All organisms utilize resources. All resources have finite limits. Eventually, at least one resource becomes
limiting and individuals that are unable toacquire necessary quantities of that resource willdie.
In ecology, competition refers to a negative
interaction between two species that use thesame type of resources and live in the same sortof places.
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
121/171
Competition
Competition among animals usually overfood
Competition among plants usually over
light, nutrients, water, pollinators Two species do not need to be closelyrelated in order to be involved incompetition.
Ants, birds and rodents may compete forseeds in a desert.
Types of Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
122/171
Types of Competition
Interference or Contest Competition Direct aggressive interaction between individuals
Organisms limit access to a necessary resource.
Organisms harm one another in the process.
The resource may or may not be in short supply.Example: Territories
Scramble or Resource Competition Direct competition for a resource in short supply
All members have access to a limiting resource. Resources are divided among all individuals even if no
individual obtains enough resources to survive.
Types of Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
123/171
Types of Competition
Intraspecificcompetition Competition between members of the same
species
Interspecific competition Competition between individuals of two
different species
Reduces fitness of both
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
124/171
Competition
One indication of competition is the widerdistribution of a species in the absence ofanother species.
If competition is suspected to affect thelocal distribution of species, two questionsmust be answered: Does competition occur between these
species? Removal Experiment What are the resources for which competition
occurs?
CompetitionSt d lli C i M t lid
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
125/171
Stream-dwelling Carnivorous Mustelids
American mink introduced to UK for fur farmingca. 1900
Eurasian otter native
Mink numbers increased dramatically in 19501980; expanded their geographic range andthreatened a number of native species
Mink numbers dropped as of 1985, with fewer
sites occupied by minks perhaps competitionwith otters?
CompetitionSt d lli C i M t lid
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
126/171
Stream-dwelling Carnivorous Mustelids
In 1999, 17 otters released into an areaoccupied by minks
Experimental and control populations
monitored for two years
CompetitionSt d lli C i M t lid
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
127/171
Stream-dwelling Carnivorous Mustelids
Competition forspace?
Otters larger andexclude minks by
direct aggression!
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
128/171
When two species compete for resources,one will always be better than the other ingathering or utilizing the resource that isscarce.
Unless the weak competitor evolves, it willbe eliminated! Avoid the superior competitor by selecting a
different part of the habitat Avoid the superior competitor by making a
change in the diet (diet shift)
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
129/171
p
Crossbills are finches that have curvedcrossed tips on the mandibles.
Extract seeds from conifer cones by lateral
movements of the lower jaw
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
130/171
p
White-winged crossbill smallest crossbill;small bill; feeds mainly on larch seeds (inrelatively soft cones)
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
131/171
p
Medium-sized common crossbill eatsspruce seeds.
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
132/171
p
Larger parrot crossbill feeds on the hardcones of Scotch pine!
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
133/171
p
Dietary differences not necessarilypreserved when the species live inisolation
Medium sized common crossbill evolved aScottish subspecies that has a large billand feeds on pine seeds and an Asiatic
subspecies that has a small bill and feedson larch seeds!
Competition
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
134/171
p
Current distributions may be the outcomeof competition over evolutionary time; theghost of the competition past
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
135/171
Abiotic Factors Limiting Distribution
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
136/171
Temperature and moisture are the twomain limiting factors to the distribution oflife on Earth.
Enormous body of literature addressingtheir effects on organisms!
Climate and Vegetation
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
137/171
g
The vegetation of any site depends on theareas climate.
Climatic factors, mainly temperature and
moisture, are the main factors controllingthe distribution of vegetation.
Gradients of Vegetation in NorthAmerica
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
138/171
America
East --------------------------------------------------------------------------------West
South------------------------------------------------------------------------------North
Climate and Vegetation
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
139/171
Geographers classify climate based onvegetation.
Native vegetation a meteorological
instrument capable of measuring all theintegrated climatic elements!
Climate and VegetationTerrestrial Biomes
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
140/171
Terrestrial Biomes
Major divisions of the terrestrialenvironment
Distinguished primarily by their
predominant plants (and animals) Associated with particular climates
Have different natural histories
Example: desert, tropical rain forest
Climate and VegetationTerrestrial Biomes
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
141/171
Terrestrial Biomes
Distribution of biomesacross the globeinfluenced by globalclimate, particularly
geographic variationsin temperature andprecipitation
Tropical Rain Forest at Sunrise
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
142/171
Climate and Vegetation
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
143/171
Climate and Vegetation
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
144/171
Climate and VegetationEffect of Latitude and Altitude
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
145/171
Effect of Latitude and Altitude
Climate and VegetationTerrestrial Biomes
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
146/171
Terrestrial Biomes
Climate and VegetationWhittaker 1975
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
147/171
Whittaker 1975
Climate and VegetationWhittaker 1975
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
148/171
Whittaker 1975
Very low precipitation (0 50 mm): trees cannotbe supported; arid shrublands and deserts
Low precipitation (50 150 mm): small trees;low density of trees; woodlands and savannas
Relatively low precipitation (150 250 mm):drought; deciduous trees to tolerate drought
Precipitation > 250 mm: Broad leaf and
evergreen trees
Climate and VegetationWhittaker 1975
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
149/171
Whittaker 1975
Warm temperature (20 to 30 degrees):Broad leaf and evergreen trees
Cool temperature (5 to 20 degrees):Deciduous trees that lose their leaves inwinter
Low temperature (-5 5 degrees): Needleleafed evergreen trees
Very low temperature (Less than -5degrees): Trees cannot grow.
Climate and Vegetation
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
150/171
Some geographers have tried to set climateboundaries independent of vegetation. Thornthwaite 1948: Climatic classification based on
balance between precipitation and potentialevapotranspiration (the amount of water lost from
the ground by evaporation and from the plants bytranspiration in the presence of unlimited watersupply)
Potential evapotranspiration difficult to measure; maybe computed as a function of temperature!
Actual evapotranspiration: The actual amount ofwater lost by plants (usually a standard crop) throughevapotranspiration given the precipitation
Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
151/171
Limiting Factors
Two options for organisms living in acertain habitat:
Tolerate climatic conditions as they are
Escape through evolutionary adaptations
Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
152/171
Limiting Factors
Temperature and moisture limit thedistribution of a species through theireffect on
survival. reproduction.
development of young organisms.
interaction with other organisms (competitors,predators, parasites) near the limits oftemperature and moisture tolerance.
Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
153/171
Limiting Factors
Plants and animals respond differently to agiven environmental variable at differentstages of their life cycle.
Mean temperature or precipitation will notalways be correlated with limits ofdistribution even if temperature and/or
moisture are the limiting factors.
Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
154/171
Limiting Factors
To show that temperature or moisture limits thedistribution of an organism:
Determine which phase of the life cycle is mostsensitive to temperature or moisture.
Identify the physiological tolerance range for this lifecycle phase.
Show that the temperature or moisture range in themicroclimate where the organism lives is permissible
for sites within the normal geographic range andlethal for sites outside it.
Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
155/171
Limiting Factors
Range limits of animals more likely to beset by temperature; few geographicdistributions of animals are likely to be set
directly by precipitation. Moisture is more likely to be of direct
importance for plants than for animals.
Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
156/171
Limiting Factors
Different plants vary greatly in their ability towithstand water shortages. Drought tolerant plants
Improve water uptake by the roots (deeper roots ormore branched roots)
Reduce water loss by stomatal closure, reduction ofleaf surface area and prevention of cuticularrespiration (thick cuticle)
Store water
Xerophytes (plants that live in dry areas) showmany of these special adaptations for avoidingwater loss.
Distributions of Plants along aMoisture Temperature Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
157/171
Moisture Temperature Gradient
Enceliaspecies distributions correspond tovariations in temperature and precipitation.
Distributions of Plants along aMoisture Temperature Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
158/171
o stu e e pe atu e G ad e t
Distributions of Plants along aMoisture Temperature Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
159/171
p
Each species occupies a distinctivemicroenvironment.
Uplandslopes
Ephemeralstreamchannelsand desertwashes
Distributions of Plants along aMoisture Temperature Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
160/171
p
Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
161/171
p
Organisms living in an intertidal zone haveevolved different degrees of resistance todrying.
Barnacles show distinctive patterns ofzonation within intertidal zones.
Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
162/171
p
Connell (1961) found Chthamalus stellatusis restricted to upper levels while Balanusbalanoidesis limited to middle and lower
levels.
Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
163/171
p
Distributional boundaries are very clear in the intertidal zones of rocky coastlines.
Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
164/171
p
Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
165/171
p
Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
166/171
p
Balanusappears to be more vulnerable todesiccation, excluding it from the upperintertidal zone.
Chthamalusadults appear to be excludedfrom lower areas by competition withBalanus.
Interaction Between Temperatureand Moisture
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
167/171
Connell (1961) discovered interspecificcompetition in barnacles. Balanusplays arole in determining lower limit of
Chthamaluswithin intertidal zone. Interspecific competition did not however
account for all observed patterns.
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
168/171
Interaction Between Temperatureand Moisture
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
169/171
Light as a Limiting Factor
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
170/171
Great diversity of photosyntheticresponses to variations in light intensityamong plants
Some reach maximal photosyntheticactivity at one quarter full sunlight.
Others never reach a maximumphotosynthetic activity; increasing
photosynthetic rate as light intensityincreases
Light as a Limiting Factor
-
7/31/2019 chatper 10
171/171
Shade tolerant plants: can live and grow inthe shade of other plants
Shade intolerant plants: cannot surviveand grow in the shade of another plant;they require open areas for survival.
Shade tolerance is a complex of traits thatis not fixed for each species and varies
with plant age microclimate and