chatper 10

Upload: joelle-eid

Post on 05-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    1/171

    Analyzing GeographicDistributions

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    2/171

    Transplant Experiments

    Moving individuals of a species to anunoccupied area and determining whether theycan survive and reproduce in the newenvironment

    Some organisms can survive but cannotreproduce in an area; follow transplantexperiments for at least one generation!

    Useful for determining whether the limitation ondistribution of a species results from theinaccessibility of an area

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    3/171

    Transplant Experiments

    A control is necessary to provideinformation on the effects of handling andtransplanting individual plants or animals.

    Includes transplants done within thedistribution

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    4/171

    Transplant Experiments

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    5/171

    Transplant Experiments

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    6/171

    Transplant Experiments

    Transplant successful

    The potential range of a species is largerthan its actual range.

    Possibly cannot move into its potentialrange or lacks suitable means to do so;problems with dispersal

    Can move into new areas, but does not dothat; study mechanism of habitatselection

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    7/171

    Transplant Experiments

    Transplant unsuccessful

    Excluded by abiotic factors or biotic interactionwith other species

    Negative effects of predators, parasites,competitors

    Positive effect of interdependent species within

    the actual range May be tested by conducting transplant

    experiments with protective devices (caging)

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    8/171

    Transplant Experiments

    If other species do not set the limits on theactual range, some physical or chemicalfactors may!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    9/171

    Transplant Experiments

    Disastrous when pests are introduced tonew areas

    Indiscriminate transplanting of organismscontains all the seeds of ecologicaldisaster!

    Most governments have stringent rulesprohibiting the importation of plants andanimals from other regions.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    10/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    11/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    12/171

    DispersalMovement of Organisms

    Ecological process affecting distributions

    Of primary interest to ecologists andbiogeographers

    Biogeography is the study of thegeographical distribution of life on Earth andthe rationale behind these distributions.

    Biogeographers are interested in historicalchanges in distribution of animals and plants.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    13/171

    Dispersal

    One of the least studied aspects ofpopulation dynamics: the branch ofpopulation ecology concerned with factors

    influencing the expansion, decline ormaintenance of populations

    Dispersal can increase or decrease local

    population densities. Immigration: moving in

    Emigration: moving out

    Migration: seasonal movements

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    14/171

    Modes of Dispersal

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    15/171

    Modes of Dispersal

    Three modes of dispersal according toPielou (1979):

    Diffusion

    Jump dispersal

    Secular dispersal

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    16/171

    Modes of DispersalDiffusion

    Gradual movement of a population acrosshospitable terrain for a period of severalgenerations

    Example: cane toad in Australia

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    17/171

    Modes of DispersalDiffusion

    Cane Toad (Bufo marinus)

    Native to Central and South America fromMexico to Brazil

    Widely introduced in the 1930s to islands

    in the Caribbean and the Pacific becauseit was believed to control scarab beetles,pests of sugar cane!

    Brought to Queensland, Australia, in 1935,where it failed to control any insect pests;became a pest itself!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    18/171

    Modes of DispersalDiffusion

    Cane Toad (Bufo marinus)

    Eat almost anything, but mainly insects

    Reproduce prolifically; 8,000 to 35,000 eggstwice a year!

    Toxic to many potential predators; some speciesof snakes are developing resistance to the toxin!

    All forms of the toad poisonous, as they contain

    a poison that causes cardiac arrest in humans Humans eating cane toad eggs have died from

    the toxin!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    19/171

    Modes of DispersalDiffusion

    Cane Toad (Bufo marinus)

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    20/171

    Modes of DispersalDiffusion

    Cane Toad (Bufo marinus)

    Cane toads have been moving west (fromQueensland) at ca. 40 km per year.

    Individual marked toads have moved up to1.8 km per night, along roads (convenienthabitat corridors for their rapid spread).

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    21/171

    Modes of DispersalJump Dispersal

    Movement of individual organisms acrosslarge distances followed by the successfulestablishment of a population in the new

    area Occurs in a short period of time, during the

    life of an individual

    Usually occurs across unsuitable terrain Example: island colonization; human

    introductions (assisted jump dispersal)

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    22/171

    Modes of DispersalSecular Dispersal

    Occurs in evolutionary time and is rarely ofimmediate interest for ecologists working inecological time

    If diffusion occurs in evolutionary time, thespecies undergoes extensive evolutionarychange in the process.

    Geographic range of a secularly dispersing

    species expands over geologic time, but naturalselection causes the migrants to diverge fromthe ancestral population.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    23/171

    Modes of DispersalSecular Dispersal

    At the end of the Ice Age, as glaciers retreatedfrom Europe and North America, one of the mostspectacular colonizations occurred.

    In 1899, Charles Reid, a British botanist, wasinterested in how trees re-colonized the BritishIsles after the Ice Age.

    From the melting of the ice around 10,000 years

    ago, till the British Isles were invaded by theRomans in AD 50, trees such as oak expandedtheir range 1000 km northward!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    24/171

    Modes of DispersalSecular Dispersal

    Oaks mature at age 10 50 years, and seedsare dropped at an average of 30 meters fromparents.

    If a tree produces a million seeds per generationover 300 generations and the seeds disperse 30meters with each generation, the simple diffusionmodel predicts a range extension of 36 km!

    Reids Paradox: Observed large discrepancybetween the rapid rate of movement of trees re-colonizing areas at the end of the Ice Age andthe observed slow dispersal rate of tree seedsspreading by diffusion.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    25/171

    Seed Dispersal

    Tree seed dispersal may be mapped byputting out seed traps at differentdistances from the parent tree or by

    mapping the location of seedlingsproduced by isolated trees.

    S d Di l

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    26/171

    Seed DispersalCornus controversa, a deciduous tree

    Mean seed dispersal = 6.7 meters

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    27/171

    Seed Dispersal

    Average seed dispersal distances fortwelve species of temperate trees in theSouthern Appalachians estimated to be 4

    34 meters

    Too small to account for recolonization bysimple diffusion after the ice melted!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    28/171

    Seed Dispersal

    The answer to Reids paradox lies in haphazard,long range dispersal of seeds by winds andanimals!

    Colonization rates are not driven by the meandispersal distance but by extreme dispersalevents!

    Extreme dispersal events very difficult to record

    because less than one in 10,000 seeds ends upbeing blown a long distance by the wind ortransported a great distance by an animal!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    29/171

    Dispersal

    May be affected by barriers: geographicfeatures that hinder or prevent dispersalacross it, producing isolation

    Barriers not always the factor limitinggeographic ranges!

    Introduced species may be unable to

    survive in a new area!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    30/171

    Dispersal

    Humans have moved many speciesaround the globe during the past 200years, often with disastrous

    consequences!

    Failure to establish a species rarelystudied!

    Accidental introductions only recordedwhen successful!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    31/171

    Dispersal

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    32/171

    Dispersal

    Continental bird introductions successful10 to 30% of the time!

    Success rate generally higher on islands!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    33/171

    Dispersal

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    34/171

    Dispersal

    Tens Rule (Williamson and Fitter, 1996):The rule of thumb that 1 in 10 speciesimported into a country becomes

    introduced, 1 in 10 of the introducedspecies become established and 1 in 10 ofthe established species become pests.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    35/171

    Dispersal

    According to the Tens Rule, the transition fromone state to another has a probability of ca. 10%(5 to 20%).

    Rule does not apply to all taxonomic groups:

    Vertebrates introduced between Europe and NorthAmerica Success at each step ca. 50%

    Aquatic species in Europe 63% of introductionsbecome established.

    Fewer than 10% of imported aquatic species become

    introduced in Europe. Of the established non-native plants in the USA, 6

    13% have invaded natural areas.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    36/171

    Dispersal

    Imported species are often successfulenough to encourage strong quarantineactions for all groups!

    Species introduced by humans constitutespectacular examples of dispersal and itseffect on distribution!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    37/171

    DispersalZebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha)

    Fingernail sized mussel native to theCaspian Sea

    Forms dense clusters on hard surfaces

    and grows rapidly Discovered in 1988 in Lake St. Claire,

    near Detroit, MI

    Possibly introduced ca. 1985, by a shipfrom a freshwater port in Europe throughballast water

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    38/171

    DispersalZebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha)

    Must have grown unnoticed for ca. 3years; noticed when they reached adensity of 750,000 individuals per square

    meter!

    Blocked water intakes of city watersystems, electrical power stations,

    industrial facilities

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    39/171

    DispersalZebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha)

    Rapid spread in river systems ofcentral USA

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    40/171

    Efficient filter feeders; positive effect onwater quality

    Make the water clearer; increase thegrowth of rooted aquatic plants

    Feed on phytoplankton, thus depressingpopulations of zooplankton

    Smother native clam species by colonizingany available hard surface

    DispersalZebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha)

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    41/171

    Why Dispersal?

    Expanding populations

    Climate change

    Food availability

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    42/171

    Dispersal of Expanding Populations

    Collared doves(Streptopeliadecaocto) spread from

    Turkey into Europeafter 1900.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    43/171

    Dispersal of Expanding Populations

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    44/171

    Dispersal of Expanding Populations

    Dispersal began suddenly:

    Not influenced by humans

    Took place in small jumps at around 45km/yr

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    45/171

    Dispersal of Expanding Populations

    R id Ch i R

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    46/171

    Rapid Changes in Response toClimate Change

    Organisms began to spread northwardabout 16,000 years ago following retreat ofglaciers and warming climate.

    Evidence found in preserved pollen in lakesediments

    Movement rate 100 - 400 m/yr

    R id Ch i R

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    47/171

    Rapid Changes in Response toClimate Change

    Di l i R Ch i

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    48/171

    Dispersal in Response to ChangingFood Supply

    Holling (1959) observed numericalresponses to increased prey availability.

    Increased prey density led to increased

    density of predators.

    Individuals move into new areas inresponse to higher prey densities.

    Di l i R t Ch i

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    49/171

    Dispersal in Response to ChangingFood Supply

    Korpimaki and Norrdahl (1991) conducteda ten-year study on voles and theirpredators.

    Di l i R t Ch i

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    50/171

    Dispersal in Response to ChangingFood Supply

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    51/171

    Dispersal in Rivers and Streams

    One of the most distinctive features ofstream and river environments is current,the downstream flow of water.

    Why doesnt the current eventually

    wash all stream/river organisms out tothe sea?

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    52/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    53/171

    Dispersal in Rivers and Streams

    Muller (1954, 1974) hypothesized thatpopulations are maintained via dynamicinterplay between downstream and

    upstream dispersal. Colonization Cycle

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    54/171

    Dispersal in Rivers and Streams

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    55/171

    Dispersal in Rivers and Streams

    A wave of migrating snailsin the Rio Claro, Costa

    Rica

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    56/171

    Dispersal in Rivers and Streams

    Close up ofmigrating snails

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    57/171

    Dispersal

    Problems associated with studyingdispersal Most dispersals probably go unnoticed as

    detailed distribution is known for so fewspecies; i.e. dispersal of individuals amongdifferent parts of a species range may beoccurring very often.

    Organisms may disperse to a new area butnot colonize it because of biotic or physicalfactors.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    58/171

    Dispersal

    Genetic process affecting geographicdifferentiation

    Colonization successful

    Dispersal results in gene flow. Genetic structure of the population is affected.

    Founder effect

    Occurs when dispersing individuals are not a random

    sample of the population

    Newly established population genetically quite distinctfrom the original population!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    59/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    60/171

    Dispersal

    Mosquitoes (and other insectspecies) may be transportedlong distances by wind.

    Studying the dispersal ofdisease-carrying mosquitoesimportant as the distances they

    disperse determine wherecontrol work must be done! Malaria control zones in tropical

    countries typically use a 2 kmbarrier surrounding humanhabitations as mosquitoes

    rarely move that far! Salt marsh mosquitoes havebeen captured on oil rigs 74106 km away from shore inLouisiana and around 96 kminland in Australia!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    61/171

    C l i ti d E ti ti

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    62/171

    Colonization and ExtinctionThe Case of Krakatau

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    63/171

    Colonization and Extinction

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    64/171

    Colonization and ExtinctionMarsupials

    Terrestrial mammals other than bats do noteasily cross saltwater barriers.

    Marsupials Kangaroos, Possums andOpossums became isolated in South America

    and Australia early in the Tertiary (60 millionyears ago). New Zealand had no native marsupials or other

    land mammals except for two species of bats atthe time the first Europeans arrived!

    Of the placental mammals, only rodents andbats were able to colonize Australia beforehumans arrived!

    Colonization and Extinction

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    65/171

    Colonization and ExtinctionMarsupials

    Colonization and Extinction

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    66/171

    Colonization and ExtinctionMarsupials

    South America was isolated from NorthAmerica by a water gap across CentralAmerica through most of the Tertiary!

    Became connected to North America ca.2million years ago! Mammals dispersed inboth directions!

    Many South American mammals becamereplaced by North American ones.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    67/171

    Colonization and Extinction

    Difficult access, limited dispersal power ofdifferent species and adaptive radiationhas produced island faunas and floras of

    unique nature! Plants and animals of Hawaii

    The Galapagos islands

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    68/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    69/171

    Colonization and Extinction

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    70/171

    Colonization and ExtinctionAntarctic Beech (Nothofagusspp.)

    Nothofagusseeds heavy; poorly adaptedfor jump dispersal

    Species probably spread slowly overland

    by diffusion and have been stopped by thesea

    Present distribution a byproduct of

    continental drift!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    71/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    72/171

    Habitat Selection

    Some organisms choose not occupy all theirpotential range; they choose not to live in certainhabitats!

    Habitat: part of the biosphere where a species

    can live either temporarily or permanently Habitat selection is one of the most poorlyunderstood ecological processes!

    Typically thought with respect to animals

    Plants show habitat preferences, but cannotactively move from one habitat to another; seedsor spores arrive at a habitat by dispersal andmay survive or die!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    73/171

    Habitat Selection

    Assuming that animals cannot liveeverywhere, natural selection will favor thedevelopment of sensory systems that can

    recognize suitable habitats! Look at places from the animals point of

    view! Areas very similar to a human

    observer may be very different to amosquito!

    Habitat Selection

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    74/171

    Habitat SelectionAnopheline Mosquitoes

    Important disease vectors Ecology well studied because of the practical

    problems of malaria eradication

    Each species usually associated with aparticular type of breeding sites

    Large areas of water seem to be free ofAnophelesmosquitoes! Why?

    The female mosquito selects the site in which to layits eggs!

    Selection not only based on whether the water issuitable for larval growth and development!

    Habitat Selection

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    75/171

    Habitat SelectionAnopheline Mosquitoes

    In southern India, Anopheles culicifacies, amalaria vector, does not occur in rice fieldsafter the plants grow to a height of 12

    inches or more! Those older rice fieldssupport two other species of Anopheles.

    If the eggs of Anopheles culicifaciesaretransplanted into old rice fields, the larvae

    survived and produced a normal numberof adults!

    Habitat Selection

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    76/171

    Habitat SelectionAnopheline Mosquitoes

    Absence of this species due to theselection of oviposition sites by females

    Limiting factor is the physical barrier posed

    by rice plants of a certain height

    Vertical bamboo strips and glass rodsplaced vertically in small ponds also

    deterred female mosquitoes from layingeggs!

    Habitat Selection

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    77/171

    Habitat SelectionAnopheline Mosquitoes

    Female mosquitoes oviposit while flying.

    Perform a hovering dance, never touchingthe water, but remaining ca. 5 10 cm

    above it

    Physical obstructions prevent femalemosquitoes from performing the dance

    freely.

    E l i f H bi P f

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    78/171

    Evolution of Habitat Preference

    Natural selection favors individuals that use thehabitats in which the most progeny can beraised successfully.

    Natural selection may act directly upon the

    behaviors that result in habitat choice or it mayselect for individuals that have the capacity tolearn which habitat is appropriate

    Populations in marginal habitats may besustained only by a net outflow of individualsfrom preferred habitats.

    E l i f H bi P f

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    79/171

    Evolution of Habitat Preference

    Directional selection for specifichabitat features that increase the

    probability of successful nesting

    In birds, survivaland reproductiondepends on nest

    site choices! May be the basis

    for nest sitepreference!

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    80/171

    Evolution of Habitat Preference

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    81/171

    Evolution of Habitat PreferenceBlue-Winged Teal (Anas discors)

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    82/171

    Evolution of Habitat Preference

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    83/171

    Evolution of Habitat PreferenceFretwell 1972

    Individuals free tomove into anyhabitat without anyconstraint; Ideal

    Free Distribution

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    84/171

    Evolution of Habitat Preference

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    85/171

    Evolution of Habitat PreferenceFretwell 1972

    Model predicts that when density is high,both good and poor habitats will haveequal suitabilities but different densities!

    Individuals will be crowded in the mostsuitable habitat and occur at lowerdensities in the less suitable habitats.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    86/171

    E l ti f H bit t P f

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    87/171

    Evolution of Habitat Preference

    Problems arise whenever habitats change. We create and destroy new habitats; some

    species have responded by invading andcolonizing our habitats (rats, mosquitoes).

    We do not know how rapidly organisms canchange the genetic and behavioral machinerythat results in habitat selection!

    Organisms with fixed, genetically programmedhabitat selection may require considerable timeto evolve the necessary machinery that willenable them to select a new suitable habitat.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    88/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    89/171

    E ploitati e Interactions

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    90/171

    Exploitative Interactions

    Exploitation: Interaction betweenpopulations that enhances fitness of oneindividual while reducing fitness of the

    exploited individual Predators kill and consume other organisms. Parasites live on host tissue and reduce host

    fitness, but do not generally kill the host.

    Parasitoid is an insect larva that consumesthe host.

    Pathogens induce disease.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    91/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    92/171

    Limitation by Predators

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    93/171

    Limitation by Predators

    Work on intertidal invertebrates hasprovided classic examples of the influenceof predation on distribution; example:

    Kitching and Ebling (1967) Studies conducted at Lough Ine, an arm of

    the sea on the south coast of Ireland

    Limitation by Predators

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    94/171

    yKitching and Ebling 1967

    The common mussel (Mytilus edulis) Widespread species on exposed rocky coasts

    in southern Ireland and throughout the world

    Small mussels (less than 25 mm long)abundant on the exposed rocky Atlantic coastbut rare or absent within Lough Ine and moreprotected parts of the coast

    Large mussels (30 70 mm long) abundant inthe northern end of the lough!

    Limitation by Predators

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    95/171

    yKitching and Ebling 1967

    Transferred pieces of rock with Mytilusattached from various parts of the lough toothers

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    96/171

    Limitation by Predators

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    97/171

    yKitching and Ebling 1967

    Small Mytilusdisappeared quickly whentransplanted anywhere in Lough Ine butdid not disappear if transplanted to the

    open coast. The rapid loss suggests predators are

    responsible.

    Limitation by Predators

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    98/171

    yKitching and Ebling 1967

    Large

    mussels

    Limitation by Predators

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    99/171

    yKitching and Ebling 1967

    Large Mytilusnaturally occur in thesouthwestern part of the lough.

    Disappeared rapidly from most stations,

    except places where they occurrednaturally

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    100/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    101/171

    Limitation by Predators

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    102/171

    Limitation by Predators

    Situation possibly more complex;exploitative interactions weave populationsinto a web of relationships that defies easy

    generalization. Predator may feed on a variety of prey

    species.

    Each prey species may in turn be fed onby several predatory species.

    Limitation by Predators

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    103/171

    Limitation by Predators

    Prey may restrict distribution of itspredator!

    If the prey is to restrict the predators

    range, the predator must be veryspecialized and feed on one or twospecies of prey only.

    Specialist or monophagous predator

    (most common among insects notvertebrates)

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    104/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    105/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    106/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    107/171

    Disease and Parasitism

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    108/171

    Native Bird Fauna of Hawaii

    Native birds common atelevation >1500 m

    Introduced birdscommon at elevation

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    109/171

    Native Bird Fauna of Hawaii

    Malaria parasite mostcommon at intermediateelevations

    Disease and Parasitism

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    110/171

    Native Bird Fauna of Hawaii

    The main malaria vector, the mosquito Culexquinquefasciatus, is most common in lowland areas.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    111/171

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    112/171

    Disease and Parasitism

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    113/171

    Native Bird Fauna of Hawaii

    Extinction of native bird fauna of Hawaii intwo pulses

    After 1900:

    Extinction due to avian malaria Birds that went extinct at this time lived in the mid-

    elevation forests where malaria parasites weremost prevalent.

    Native birds retreated to high elevation forestswhere mosquitoes are rare.

    Effect of climate change?

    Allelopathy

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    114/171

    Allelopathy

    Some organisms, particularly plants, maybe limited in local distribution by poisonsor antibiotics, also called allelopathic

    agents. The action of penicillin among

    microorganisms is a classic!

    Allelopathy

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    115/171

    Allelopathy

    Soil sickness due to toxic secretions fromplants

    For a piece of ground continuously planted

    in one crop, the yields decrease andcannot be improved by additional fertilizer!

    Detrimental effects of plants growing with

    one another grass and apple trees!

    Allelopathy

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    116/171

    Allelopathy

    Allelopathy

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    117/171

    Allelopathy

    Wheat has good potential for weed controlin agricultural landscapes.

    Wheat seedlings reduce root growth in the

    annual ryegrass (a common weed).

    Allelopathy

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    118/171

    Allelopathy

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    119/171

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    120/171

    Competition

    Concept so familiar in capitalist societies! All organisms utilize resources. All resources have finite limits. Eventually, at least one resource becomes

    limiting and individuals that are unable toacquire necessary quantities of that resource willdie.

    In ecology, competition refers to a negative

    interaction between two species that use thesame type of resources and live in the same sortof places.

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    121/171

    Competition

    Competition among animals usually overfood

    Competition among plants usually over

    light, nutrients, water, pollinators Two species do not need to be closelyrelated in order to be involved incompetition.

    Ants, birds and rodents may compete forseeds in a desert.

    Types of Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    122/171

    Types of Competition

    Interference or Contest Competition Direct aggressive interaction between individuals

    Organisms limit access to a necessary resource.

    Organisms harm one another in the process.

    The resource may or may not be in short supply.Example: Territories

    Scramble or Resource Competition Direct competition for a resource in short supply

    All members have access to a limiting resource. Resources are divided among all individuals even if no

    individual obtains enough resources to survive.

    Types of Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    123/171

    Types of Competition

    Intraspecificcompetition Competition between members of the same

    species

    Interspecific competition Competition between individuals of two

    different species

    Reduces fitness of both

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    124/171

    Competition

    One indication of competition is the widerdistribution of a species in the absence ofanother species.

    If competition is suspected to affect thelocal distribution of species, two questionsmust be answered: Does competition occur between these

    species? Removal Experiment What are the resources for which competition

    occurs?

    CompetitionSt d lli C i M t lid

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    125/171

    Stream-dwelling Carnivorous Mustelids

    American mink introduced to UK for fur farmingca. 1900

    Eurasian otter native

    Mink numbers increased dramatically in 19501980; expanded their geographic range andthreatened a number of native species

    Mink numbers dropped as of 1985, with fewer

    sites occupied by minks perhaps competitionwith otters?

    CompetitionSt d lli C i M t lid

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    126/171

    Stream-dwelling Carnivorous Mustelids

    In 1999, 17 otters released into an areaoccupied by minks

    Experimental and control populations

    monitored for two years

    CompetitionSt d lli C i M t lid

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    127/171

    Stream-dwelling Carnivorous Mustelids

    Competition forspace?

    Otters larger andexclude minks by

    direct aggression!

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    128/171

    When two species compete for resources,one will always be better than the other ingathering or utilizing the resource that isscarce.

    Unless the weak competitor evolves, it willbe eliminated! Avoid the superior competitor by selecting a

    different part of the habitat Avoid the superior competitor by making a

    change in the diet (diet shift)

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    129/171

    p

    Crossbills are finches that have curvedcrossed tips on the mandibles.

    Extract seeds from conifer cones by lateral

    movements of the lower jaw

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    130/171

    p

    White-winged crossbill smallest crossbill;small bill; feeds mainly on larch seeds (inrelatively soft cones)

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    131/171

    p

    Medium-sized common crossbill eatsspruce seeds.

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    132/171

    p

    Larger parrot crossbill feeds on the hardcones of Scotch pine!

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    133/171

    p

    Dietary differences not necessarilypreserved when the species live inisolation

    Medium sized common crossbill evolved aScottish subspecies that has a large billand feeds on pine seeds and an Asiatic

    subspecies that has a small bill and feedson larch seeds!

    Competition

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    134/171

    p

    Current distributions may be the outcomeof competition over evolutionary time; theghost of the competition past

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    135/171

    Abiotic Factors Limiting Distribution

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    136/171

    Temperature and moisture are the twomain limiting factors to the distribution oflife on Earth.

    Enormous body of literature addressingtheir effects on organisms!

    Climate and Vegetation

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    137/171

    g

    The vegetation of any site depends on theareas climate.

    Climatic factors, mainly temperature and

    moisture, are the main factors controllingthe distribution of vegetation.

    Gradients of Vegetation in NorthAmerica

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    138/171

    America

    East --------------------------------------------------------------------------------West

    South------------------------------------------------------------------------------North

    Climate and Vegetation

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    139/171

    Geographers classify climate based onvegetation.

    Native vegetation a meteorological

    instrument capable of measuring all theintegrated climatic elements!

    Climate and VegetationTerrestrial Biomes

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    140/171

    Terrestrial Biomes

    Major divisions of the terrestrialenvironment

    Distinguished primarily by their

    predominant plants (and animals) Associated with particular climates

    Have different natural histories

    Example: desert, tropical rain forest

    Climate and VegetationTerrestrial Biomes

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    141/171

    Terrestrial Biomes

    Distribution of biomesacross the globeinfluenced by globalclimate, particularly

    geographic variationsin temperature andprecipitation

    Tropical Rain Forest at Sunrise

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    142/171

    Climate and Vegetation

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    143/171

    Climate and Vegetation

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    144/171

    Climate and VegetationEffect of Latitude and Altitude

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    145/171

    Effect of Latitude and Altitude

    Climate and VegetationTerrestrial Biomes

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    146/171

    Terrestrial Biomes

    Climate and VegetationWhittaker 1975

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    147/171

    Whittaker 1975

    Climate and VegetationWhittaker 1975

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    148/171

    Whittaker 1975

    Very low precipitation (0 50 mm): trees cannotbe supported; arid shrublands and deserts

    Low precipitation (50 150 mm): small trees;low density of trees; woodlands and savannas

    Relatively low precipitation (150 250 mm):drought; deciduous trees to tolerate drought

    Precipitation > 250 mm: Broad leaf and

    evergreen trees

    Climate and VegetationWhittaker 1975

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    149/171

    Whittaker 1975

    Warm temperature (20 to 30 degrees):Broad leaf and evergreen trees

    Cool temperature (5 to 20 degrees):Deciduous trees that lose their leaves inwinter

    Low temperature (-5 5 degrees): Needleleafed evergreen trees

    Very low temperature (Less than -5degrees): Trees cannot grow.

    Climate and Vegetation

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    150/171

    Some geographers have tried to set climateboundaries independent of vegetation. Thornthwaite 1948: Climatic classification based on

    balance between precipitation and potentialevapotranspiration (the amount of water lost from

    the ground by evaporation and from the plants bytranspiration in the presence of unlimited watersupply)

    Potential evapotranspiration difficult to measure; maybe computed as a function of temperature!

    Actual evapotranspiration: The actual amount ofwater lost by plants (usually a standard crop) throughevapotranspiration given the precipitation

    Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    151/171

    Limiting Factors

    Two options for organisms living in acertain habitat:

    Tolerate climatic conditions as they are

    Escape through evolutionary adaptations

    Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    152/171

    Limiting Factors

    Temperature and moisture limit thedistribution of a species through theireffect on

    survival. reproduction.

    development of young organisms.

    interaction with other organisms (competitors,predators, parasites) near the limits oftemperature and moisture tolerance.

    Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    153/171

    Limiting Factors

    Plants and animals respond differently to agiven environmental variable at differentstages of their life cycle.

    Mean temperature or precipitation will notalways be correlated with limits ofdistribution even if temperature and/or

    moisture are the limiting factors.

    Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    154/171

    Limiting Factors

    To show that temperature or moisture limits thedistribution of an organism:

    Determine which phase of the life cycle is mostsensitive to temperature or moisture.

    Identify the physiological tolerance range for this lifecycle phase.

    Show that the temperature or moisture range in themicroclimate where the organism lives is permissible

    for sites within the normal geographic range andlethal for sites outside it.

    Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    155/171

    Limiting Factors

    Range limits of animals more likely to beset by temperature; few geographicdistributions of animals are likely to be set

    directly by precipitation. Moisture is more likely to be of direct

    importance for plants than for animals.

    Temperature and Moisture asLimiting Factors

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    156/171

    Limiting Factors

    Different plants vary greatly in their ability towithstand water shortages. Drought tolerant plants

    Improve water uptake by the roots (deeper roots ormore branched roots)

    Reduce water loss by stomatal closure, reduction ofleaf surface area and prevention of cuticularrespiration (thick cuticle)

    Store water

    Xerophytes (plants that live in dry areas) showmany of these special adaptations for avoidingwater loss.

    Distributions of Plants along aMoisture Temperature Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    157/171

    Moisture Temperature Gradient

    Enceliaspecies distributions correspond tovariations in temperature and precipitation.

    Distributions of Plants along aMoisture Temperature Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    158/171

    o stu e e pe atu e G ad e t

    Distributions of Plants along aMoisture Temperature Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    159/171

    p

    Each species occupies a distinctivemicroenvironment.

    Uplandslopes

    Ephemeralstreamchannelsand desertwashes

    Distributions of Plants along aMoisture Temperature Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    160/171

    p

    Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    161/171

    p

    Organisms living in an intertidal zone haveevolved different degrees of resistance todrying.

    Barnacles show distinctive patterns ofzonation within intertidal zones.

    Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    162/171

    p

    Connell (1961) found Chthamalus stellatusis restricted to upper levels while Balanusbalanoidesis limited to middle and lower

    levels.

    Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    163/171

    p

    Distributional boundaries are very clear in the intertidal zones of rocky coastlines.

    Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    164/171

    p

    Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    165/171

    p

    Distributions of Barnacles Along anIntertidal Exposure Gradient

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    166/171

    p

    Balanusappears to be more vulnerable todesiccation, excluding it from the upperintertidal zone.

    Chthamalusadults appear to be excludedfrom lower areas by competition withBalanus.

    Interaction Between Temperatureand Moisture

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    167/171

    Connell (1961) discovered interspecificcompetition in barnacles. Balanusplays arole in determining lower limit of

    Chthamaluswithin intertidal zone. Interspecific competition did not however

    account for all observed patterns.

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    168/171

    Interaction Between Temperatureand Moisture

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    169/171

    Light as a Limiting Factor

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    170/171

    Great diversity of photosyntheticresponses to variations in light intensityamong plants

    Some reach maximal photosyntheticactivity at one quarter full sunlight.

    Others never reach a maximumphotosynthetic activity; increasing

    photosynthetic rate as light intensityincreases

    Light as a Limiting Factor

  • 7/31/2019 chatper 10

    171/171

    Shade tolerant plants: can live and grow inthe shade of other plants

    Shade intolerant plants: cannot surviveand grow in the shade of another plant;they require open areas for survival.

    Shade tolerance is a complex of traits thatis not fixed for each species and varies

    with plant age microclimate and