chemotherapy therapy (larynx cancer)

6
ABSTRACT: Am  Roenigenol 126 : 1082-1087, 1976 1082 ADJUVANT CHEMOIMMUNOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED LESI NS OF THE HEAD AND NECK FREDERICK R . E ii.n t’ AND DONALD L. M ow ro c’ Growth of malignant tumors of the head and neck has been associated with pro- gressive impairment of immunologic activity. Successful control of disease has been shown to reverse this defect. Preliminary results of a nonrandomized trial reduced recurrence of head and neck canc r for a median time of I I .5 months in eight of 10 patients who received chemoimmunotherapy adjuvant to surgical resection r radiation treatment. The number of patients in the series was small and the follow- up tim e too short to determine the length of effectiveness for this treatment. Based on these results, a new protocol has been initiated to randomize atients with ad- vanced T3 and T4 lesions into groups for comparison f adjuvant chemotherapy alone with adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. INTRODUCTION The concept of host resistance as an impor- tant factor in both the inception and pro- gression of head and neck malignancy has been proposed for many years. It originates from observations of the unpredictable clinical course for patients with tumors in these anatomic locations. Whereas some patients have a rapid recurrence of disease despite apparently adequate treatment for early tumors, other patients demonstrate a relatively slow progression of disease de- spite far-advanced malignancies. Growth of malignant tumor of the head and neck has been associated with progres- sive impairment of immunologic reactivity [I]. Anergy has been observed in patients prior to the development of cachexia and malnutrition, even without widespre d visceral and bone marrow involvement. he immunologic impairment noted in cancer patients was not a defect that pre- ceded the development of malignancy because it could be reversed if successful control of disease was achieved [2-4]. Opti- mistically, then, it might be possible to augment the immunologic rea tivity of the cancer patient. However, additional re- ports have shown that the therapeutic modalities used to treat neoplasms of the head and neck are themselves immuno- suppressive. The suppressive effects of surgery [ and chemotherapy [6] appear to be of relatively short duration; the im- munosuppressive effects of radiotherapy [ 7, 8] may or may not be more prolonged [9-I I]. Thus it would seem hat if immuno- logic reactivity could be maintained during treatment, a greaten therapeutic benefit might be achieved. While immunotherapy for treatment of malignancies in laboratory animals as well as for malignant melanoma in man has been shown to be effective its use is limited. In laboratory animals it was of benefit when the tumor burden was in a ratio of approximately I07_108 cells [12]; larger amounts of tumor rarely responded to immunologic manipulation. These same principles seem to be applicable in man. A in patients with subclinical disease [13] whereas for more adva ced disease, results were not nearly as impressive [14]. If im- munotherapy is a plied to the treatment of patients with tumors of the head and neck, These investigations were supported by grants from the U.S. Public Health Service (C A 12582) and from Surgical S ervic es, S epu l- veda Veterans Administration HospitaL 1 Division of Oncology, Department of Surgery, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Lo s A ngeles, California oo2 a nd S ur gic al Services, Sepulveda Veterans Administration Hospital Sepulveda, Californ a 91343. Address reprint requests to the Division of Oncology.    D   o   w   n    l   o   a    d   e    d    f   r   o   m    w   w   w  .   a    j   r   o   n    l    i   n   e  .   o   r   g    b   y    5    9  .    1    7    7  .    1    3    7  .    7    3   o   n    0    1    /    2    2    /    1    4    f   r   o   m     I    P   a    d    d   r   e   s   s    5    9  .    1    7    7  .    1    3    7  .    7    3  .    C   o   p   y   r    i   g    h    t    A    R    R    S  .    F   o   r   p   e   r   s   o   n   a    l   u   s   e   o   n    l   y   ;   a    l    l   r    i   g    h    t   s   r   e   s   e   r   v   e    d

Upload: yogesh-yadav

Post on 03-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

8/12/2019 Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chemotherapy-therapy-larynx-cancer 1/6

ABSTRACT:

Am   Roenigenol 12 6 : 1082-1087, 1976

1082

A D JU V A N T C H E M O IM M U N O T H E R A P Y IN A D V A N C E D

L E S IO N S O F T H E H E A D A N D N E C K

F R E D E R I C K R . E ii.n t’ A N D D O N A L D L . M ow ro c’

G ro w th o f m aligna n t tu m o rs o f the h ea d an d ne ck ha s b ee n a ssoc ia ted w ith p ro -

g ress ive im pa irm en t o f im m u no log ic ac tiv ity . S u cc e ssfu l co n tro l o f d ise ase ha s b e en

sho w n to rev erse th is de fe ct. P re lim ina ry re su lts o f a no nra nd om iz ed tria l red uc ed

re cu rren ce o f h ea d a nd n ec k c a nc er fo r a m e d ia n tim e o f I I .5 m on ths in eigh t o f 10

p atien ts w h o rec e ive d c he m o im m u no the ra py ad ju va n t to su rg ic a l re sec tio n o r

ra d ia tio n trea tm en t. T he nu m b er o f p atie n ts in th e serie s w a s sm all an d th e fo llo w -

u p tim e to o sho rt to de te rm in e th e le ng th o f e ffec tiv en ess fo r th is tre a tm e n t. B ase d

o n th ese resu lts , a n ew p ro to co l ha s be e n in itia ted to ran do m iz e pa tie n ts w ith a d -

va nc e d T 3 a nd T 4 le sion s in to g ro up s fo r co m p a riso n o f a d ju va n t c he m oth era py

a lon e w ith a d ju va n t c he m o im m u no the ra py .

INTRODUCTION

T h e c on ce p t o f ho s t re s is ta nc e a s an im po r-

tan t fac to r in b o th th e inc ep tio n an d pro -

g ress io n o f h ea d a nd ne ck m a lig na nc y ha s

b ee n p ro po sed fo r m a ny y ea rs . I t o rig ina tes

fro m o bserv a tion s o f th e u np red ic tab le

clin ic al c ou rse fo r p atien ts w ith tum ors in

the se a na to m ic lo ca tio ns . W h ere a s som e

pa tie n ts ha ve a ra p id rec u rre nc e o f d ise ase

de sp ite a pp are n tly a de qu ate trea tm en t fo r

ea rly tu m o rs, o th e r p atien ts de m o nstra te a

re la tiv ely slow p rog ress io n o f d ise ase de -sp ite fa r-a dv an ce d m a lig na nc ies .

G ro w th o f m a lig na n t tu m o rs o f the h ea d

a nd n ec k h as be en a ssoc ia ted w ith p ro g re s-

sive im p airm e n t o f im m uno lo g ic re ac tiv ity

[I]. A n er g y h as be en ob se rve d in pa tie n ts

p rio r to the d ev elopm e n t o f c ac he x ia a nd

m a lnu tritio n , e ve n w itho u t w id esp rea d

v isc e ra l a nd bo ne m a rro w in vo lve m e n t.

T he im m u no log ic im pa irm en t no te d in

c an ce r p atie n ts w as no t a de fec t th at p re -

c ed ed th e de ve lop m e n t o f m a lign an c y

be ca u se it co u ld be re v erse d if suc ce ssfu l

co n tro l o f d ise ase w a s ac h iev ed [2 -4 ] . O pt i -

m is tic a lly , the n , it m ig h t be p oss ib le to

au gm e n t the im m u no log ic re a ctiv ity o f the

c an ce r p a tien t. H ow ev e r, a dd ition a l re-

p o rts ha v e sh ow n th at th e th era pe u tic

m od ali tie s u sed to trea t ne op lasm s o f the

he ad a n d n ec k a re th em selve s im m u no -

sup pre ss ive . T he su ppre ss ive e ffec ts o f

s u rge ry [ an d ch em o the rap y [6 ] ap pe ar to

be o f re la tive ly sho rt du rat ion ; the im -

m un osu pp ress ive effe c ts o f ra d io th era py

[7 , 8 ] m ay o r m ay n o t be m o re p ro long ed

[9 -I I ]. T h u s it w ou ld see m tha t if im m u no -

lo g ic rea c tiv i ty co u ld be m ain ta ine d d urin g

tre atm e n t, a g re ate n th era pe u tic b en efi t

m igh t be a c h ie ve d .

W hile im m u no the ra py fo r tre atm e n t o f

m align an cie s in lab o ra to ry a n im als a s w e ll

as fo r m a lign a n t m e lan om a in m an ha s

be en sho w n to b e e ffe ctive its u se is

lim ite d . In la bo rato ry an im a ls it w as o f

be ne fit w he n th e tum or bu rd e n w a s in a

ra t io o f a pp rox im a te ly I07_108 cel ls [12] ;

la rge r a m o un ts o f tu m o r rare ly re spo nd ed

to im m un o lo g ic m a n ip u la tio n . T h ese sam e

prin cip le s se em to b e a pp lic ab le in m a n . A

the rap eu tic e ffec t w a s ge n era lly a ch ie ve d

in p at ien ts w ith su bc lin ica l d isea se [13 ]

w he re as fo r m ore ad va nc ed d isea se , re su ltsw ere n o t n e arly a s im p ress iv e [14] . If im -

m u no the ra py is ap p lied to the tre a tm e n t o f

pa tie n ts w ith tu m o rs o f th e he ad a nd n e ck ,

T h e se inve stig ation s w e re sup porte d by gra n ts from the U .S . P u blic H ea lth Serv ice (C A 1258 2) an d fr om S u r g ic a l S erv ic es, S epu l-

ve d a V ete ran s A d m in istr a tion H o sp ita L

1 D iv is ion o f O n co logy , D ep artm e n t o f S u rg er y , U C L A C e n ter for th e H ea lth S cie n ce s , Lo s A ngeles, C a lifo rn ia oo2 a nd S ur gic al

S e rv ices , S ep ulv eda V e terans A d m inis tra t ion H ospita l S e pulved a, C a lifo rn ia 91343 . A d d r e s s rep r in t req ue sts to the D iv isio n o f

O ncology .

Page 2: Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

8/12/2019 Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chemotherapy-therapy-larynx-cancer 2/6

C H E M O IM M U N O T H E R A P Y IN H E A D A N D N E C K L E S IO N S 1083

it c an no t be use d a s a p rim a ry tre a tm e n t

m o da lity bu t ra the r a s a n ad juv an t to th e

e x ist ing the ra pe u tic m o da lities o f su rge ry ,

ra d ia tion , an d c h em oth e ra p y .

P re lim ina ry rep o rts from D o na ld so n

[ 15 , i6 ] h av e sh ow n tha t a g re a te r the na -

pe u tic resp on se w a s ac h ie v ed in he ad an d

n ec k p atien ts w h en B C G , a no nspe c ific im -

m u ne s tim u lan t, w a s c om bin ed w ith ch em o -

the rap y (m e th o tre xa te ) tha n w he n c he m o-

th era py a lon e w as use d .

T h is pa p er d e sc rib es a pha se I p ilo t study

d es ig ne d to de te rm in e the effe c t o f B C G

im m un o th era p y in c om bina tio n w ith

m e th o tre xa te . T h is reg im en w as e va lua te d

in p a tien ts w ith recu rren t m a lign an t d isea se

of the he ad a nd ne ck a nd in p atie n ts w ith

a dv a nc ed le s io ns w h o h ad a n 8o ch an c e

o f re c u rre nc e w ith s tan da rd m o de s o f

therapy.

S U B JE C T S A N D M E T H O D S

T he 20 pa tie n ts iR v es tiga ted w ere ev alu a ted

e ith er in th e D ep a rtm e n t o f S u rg e ry , D iv is io n

o f O n c o lo gy , U C L A S c ho o l o f M e d icin e , o r the

S epu lveda V ete rans A dm in istra tion H o sp ita l,

S e pu lv ed a, C a lifo rn ia . T he y ra ng ed in ag e fro m

29 tO 73 y e ars . A ll ha d a dva n ce d ‘F 3 or

squ am o us ce ll ne op lasm s of the he a d a nd n ec k

reg ion an d ha d no h isto ry o fp rio r m a lign a nc ies

o r e v id e nc e o f w id esp re a d tu m or b efo re a d -

m in istratio n of chem o im m u no th erapy . P a -

tie n ts w e re c lin ica lly e va lu ate d b y c om ple te

p hys ica l exam ina tion , chest x -ray , an d liv e r,

b ra in , a nd b on e sc a n p rio r to en te ring the s tu dy .

H isto log ic con firm a tion of sq uam o us C eil ca rc i-

n o m a w as o b ta ine d in e ve ry c ase .

T he ex pe rim en ta l na tu re o f the p ro ce du res

w a s ex p la in ed to ea ch pa tie n t p rio r to e n terin g

th e s tud y a nd a s ig ne d co nse n t w a s ob ta ine d .

P a tie n ts w ere d iv id ed in to th ree c a teg o rie s :

tho se w ho h ad fa ile d o n all p rev iou s the ra py

a nd h ad e s ta b lish ed d isea se (ta b le x ) ; and tho se

w h o d id no t h av e clin ic al ly e v ide n t d ise a se b u t

w h o w ere trea te d p rop hy la ctica lly fo r sub -

c lin ic al d ise ase fo llow ing rad ia tion th era py

(table 2) or su rge ry an d rad ia tio n the rap y

 table 3 .

T h e c he m o the ra pe u tic d rug m e tho tre xa te

(  o m g /m 2) w as a d m in is te red o nc e a w ee k fo r

I m on th an d e ve ry o th er w e ek the rea fte r fo r

the du ration o f th e s tud y . Im m un o th e ra p y

w a s a cc om plish e d w ith B C G T ice s tra in from

C hic ag o R e se a rch , a dm in is tere d by the T in e

te ch n iq ue to the ax illa e an d bo th g ro in s ev e ry

w ee k fo r 3 m o n th s a nd the n ev ery o th er w e e k

fo r the du ration o f the s tu dy . F o llow -u p ex am i-

n ation w a s pe rfo rm e d ea c h m o n th .

A c om ple te resp on se to ch em othe rap y w as

d efine d a s th e d isap pe ara n ce o f a ll v is ib le d is-

e a se an d no ev id en ce o f ne w d isea se fo r a

p eriod o f 2 m on ths. A pa rtial re spo nse w as de -

fin ed a s o re du ction in e s tab lishe d d ise ase

and no new lesion s. W h ile su rg ical p roced ures

d iffere d fo r e ac h pa tie n t, the y ba s ic ally in -

c lud e d e n b lo c re sec tio n o f th e p rim a ry tu m or

a nd reg ion al ly m ph no de s . X -ra y trea tm en t

w a s g iv en us in g c ob alt 6o te le th era py at a

d osa ge o f oo o -6 ,o oo rads o ve r 6 w eeks.

Im m uno log ic eva lu atio ns o f de layed cu tane -

o us hy pe rsen s itiv ity w ere pe rfo rm e d w ith top i-

c al ly ap p lie d d in i troc h lo rob en z en e (D N C B )

and a ba ttery o f reca ll an tig en s. R eac tions w ere

re co rde d a fter 48 h r. S eria l D N C B sk in te s ting

w as p erfo rm ed a t m on th ly in te rva ls [J. A

hy persens itiv ity sco re w as ass igned to each

te s t, an d a sc o re o f 3 o r g re ate r w as c ons id e red

pos i t ive [17] .

R E S U L T S

T a b le I sh ow s th e re su lts o f ch em oim -

m u no the na py in s ix p at ien ts w ith es ta b -

l ishe d re c u rre n t d ise a se . A c o m p lete n e-

sp on se to c he m oim m u no th era py w a s ob -

ta m ed in o n ly on e pa tie n t , n o . i. T h is pa -

tie n t ha d ree x cis io n o f th e p rim ary tum or,

m a x illary a n tru m , a nd o rb it m on th s a fter

in itiatio n o f chem oim m un o the rap y an d has

b ee n free o f d ise a se 6 m on th s fo llow in g th is

su rge ry . M icro sco p ic re s idu al d ise ase w as

p rese n t in th e op era tiv e sp ec im en . P a tie n ts

2 an d 3 ha ve m ain ta ine d a o re duc t ion

in tum o r size fo r and 5 m o nths, re spec -

t ive ly . B o th pa tie n ts ha ve c lin ica lly e v id en t

res id ua l d ise a se bu t h av e no t de ve lop ed

ne w le s ion s. T he re m ain ing th re e p at ien tsd id no t ha ve a ny m ea su ra b le d ec rea se in

tum or s iz e , an d a ll e xp ire d .

S im u lta ne ou sly , w e be ga n a no nna n do m -

ize d p rosp ec tiv e s tud y of th e B C G -m e th o -

trex ate co m b in atio n a s a d ju va n t tre a tm e n t

to ra d ia tio n o r su rge ry . T a b le 2 sho w s the

resu lts o f trea tm en t w ith a d ju va n t c he m o-

im m u no the rap y fo r s ta ge T 3 a nd T 4

Page 3: Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

8/12/2019 Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chemotherapy-therapy-larynx-cancer 3/6

N o ra .-N on e of th e se p atien ts w ere tr ea te d su rg ic a lly .

1084 E IL B E R A N D M O R T O N

T A B L E

C H E M O IM M U N O T H E R A P Y IN P A T IE N T S W IT H E S T A B L IS H E D R E C U R R E N T D IS E A S E

Locat ion of

P atie n t A ge P rim a ry M alig nan t D ate o f X -ray D ate o f C h e m oim m u n o - R esp on se F o llo w -u p

N o. (Y r ) T u m or N ec k N o d es O p er a tion T h er ap y R ec u rr en c e th e ra p y ( ) ( M o )

I  6 Antrum - IO/’74 P reO p 4 /’7 4 M tx , B C G 10 0 6

and 8 /’73

in tra- I

cranial

2 7 3 T em p o r a l 4/1 2 I2 /’74 P o stO p I/F 75 * M tx , B C G o 4

bone 12/’74

3 54 R et r o m o l a r 10 /I 5 8 /’74 P o s t O p 10/174* M tx , B C G o9 /174

4 62 Larynx 4 /10 8 /’74 P o stO p 12/’74 M tx , B C G o 39/174

5 6 i T o nsil + . .   8 /’73 I2 /’73 M tx , B C G o 3

6 5 T o n g u e + . . . 8 /’73 Io /’73 M tx , B C G o 2

base

I Dur i ng x-ra y th er ap y.

squ am ou s c e ll ca rc ino m a of the he a d an d pa tie n ts ha d po stop era tiv e ra d ia tio n the n -

n e ck in w h ich rad ia tion th era py w a s th e ap y to the tum o r b ed a nd the re g io na l

p rim ary m od ality . O f the fou r pa tien ts lym pha tic s excep t fo r pa tien ts 4 an d   w ho

tre ate d th us far, th re e a re free o f re cu rren t w ere op era te d on afte r ra d ia tio n th era py

d isea se a fter a m ed ia n o f 6 m o n th s . O n e fa ilu re .

p atien t h ad ra p id re cu rren ce de sp ite ra d i-  

a tio n a nd ch e m o im m un o the rap y a nd cx - Toxici ty

p ired w ith in 4 m on ths o f on se t o f trea t- F o r s ix o f th e 14 pat ien ts (40 ) t rea ted

m en t. A ltho ugh the fo llow -u p tim e is w ith ad ju van t ch em oim m un o the rap y , it

re la tive ly sh o rt fo r the se p atien ts , th e ir w a s n ec e ssa ry to d ec rea se the sc he du le d

c lin ica l resp on se ha s be e n d ram a tic . d osa ge o f m e tho tre xa te . T he m a jo r tox ic

A serie s o f io p atien ts w a s tre ated w ith e ffec t w a s he m ato po etic , m a n ife s ted b y

ad juv an t c h em oim m un o th era py fo llow in g w hite ce ll co un ts low e r tha n 2 ,000 . T h e de -

su rg ica l ex cis ion of all g ross tu m or p lus lay in treatm en t w as n ev er m ore than i

rad ia t ion the rap y (ta b le 3 . E igh t o f th e 10 w e ek . N o inc id en ce o fre na l tox ic ity , se ps is ,

( 8o ) are a live and free o f recu rren t d is- o r pe rm anen t bon e m arrow tox ic ity w as

ea se after a m e d ian o f i i . m o nth s . A ll o bse rv e d . O ra l u lc era tio n w as ob se rv ed in

T A B L E 2

C H E M O IM M U N O T H E R A P Y A S A D JU V A N T T R E A T M E N T T O R A D IA T IO N T H E R A P Y

Locat on of

P a tien t A ge Pr imary M align an t X -R ay T h er ap y C h em oim m u n o- F o llow -u p

N o . (Y r ) T u m o r N ec k N od e s (R ad ) th e rap y S ta tu s (M o)

I 6 8 R e trom o lar + s ,o oo M tx , B C G N .E .D . 4

2 48 T ong ue base + 5 , 000 M tx , B C G N .E .D . 8

3 47 T on gue ba se - 5 ,o oo M tx , B C G N .E .D . 6

4 6 L a r y n x   5 , 000 M t x , B C G E xp ired 4

(r u r re nc e )

Page 4: Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

8/12/2019 Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chemotherapy-therapy-larynx-cancer 4/6

Page 5: Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

8/12/2019 Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chemotherapy-therapy-larynx-cancer 5/6

1086 E IL B E R A N D M O R T O N

o ur o p in ion , th e B C G -m etho trex ate c om -

b ina tion app ears to h ave lim ited v alu e fo r

th is type of pa tien t. O n ly one of six pa -

tien ts ach ieved a co m ple te re spo nse , and

th a t ha d to be fo llo w e d by fu rthe r su rg ic a l

in te rve n tio n . T h us i t a pp ea rs u n like ly tha t

c om plete tu m o r de s truc tio n w a s e ve r

a c h ie ve d .

T h e re su lts o f c he m o im m u no the ra py a s

ad ju van t to su rge ry o r irrad ia tion w ere

m u ch m o re im pre ss iv e . S in ce , s ta tis tic a lly ,

8 o o f the se p atien ts w ou ld deve lop re -

c u rre n t d ise ase , re sidu al sub cl in ic a l d ise a se

w a s ve ry like ly p re sen t a t th e c om pletion

o f su rg ery an d /o r rad ia t ion th era p y . T he

fa vo rab le re su lts re po rted he re m ust be

te m pe red by the fac t tha t th is w a s n o t a

ra n dom iz ed tria l n o r d id it inc lu de c on -

se c u tiv e pa tie n ts ; a lso , the du ration o f the

s tu dy w a s re la tiv ely sho rt. H o w ev er, the

re su lts a re encourag ing since th e c lin ical

c ou rse o f pa tie n ts w ith a dva n ce d tu m o rs o f

th e he a d an d n ec k is re la tiv ely c on s ta n t.

T he m e d ia n tim e to rec u rre nc e in sev era l

se rie s is ap p ro x im ately 8 m o n th s . A m uc h

lon ge r fo llo w -up tim e is o bv iou s ly re qu ired

b efo re th e a c tua l ou tco m e fo r the se pa -

tien ts c an b e d e term in ed . H o w e ve r, it d oe s

a pp ea r th at the p roc e du re o f c he m o -

im m un o th era py is w ell to lera te d w ith a c-

c ep ta b le tox ic ity a nd th at it d e cre ase s th e

re cu rren c e ra te , a t le as t b ase d on the sho rt-

te rm fo llow -u p of the se pa tie n ts . W he th er

th e d ise ase w ill e ve n tu al ly re c u r rem a ins

to b e see n .

In ad d ition , the qu es tio n rem ains o f

w h ethe r B C G im m un o th era py c on tribu te d

to the ch em othe rap eu tic re g im e n . O n th e

b asis o f th ese lim ited da ta , the answ er is

u nc erta in . A lth ou gh the n on spe cific re-

a ctiv ity to D N C B w as m ain ta ine d in fou r

p atien ts and even rev e rsed fro m n eg ativ eto p os it ive in 12 patients , it is no t c le ar

w h eth er B C G w a s respo ns ib le . C o nse -

q ue n tly w e ha ve b eg un a p ro spe ctive tria l

th at w ill ran do m ize pa tie n ts w ith a d -

v an ce d T 3 a nd T 4 les io ns in to a d ju va n t

c he m o the ra py a lon e v ersu s ch em oim m un o-

the ra py .

H op efu lly a c om bin at ion o f p rese n tly

a va ila b le tre a tm e n t m od a litie s -su rge ry ,

rad ia tion the rapy , chem oth e rapy , and im -

m u no th erapy-w ill re su lt in a m ore su c -

c e ssfu l m e an s fo r d isea se c on tro l in a

g rea te r p ercen tag e of th ese pa tien ts .

R E F E R E N C E S

I . E ilber FR , M o rton D L , K e tcham A S : C orre la -

tion o f im m uno lo g ic reac tiv ity and c lin ica l

co urse in pa tien ts w ith so lid neop la sm s o f th e

h ead and n eck in N eop la sia o fthe H ead an d N eck,

Proceed ings 17th A nnu a l C lin ica l C onfe rence

o n C ancer , M . D . A nd erson H o sp ita l and T u m o r

Institu te, C h icag o , Y ea r B ook M edica l P ub -

lishers ‘974 pp. 2 1 1 -21 9

2 . Y ou ng R C , C o rde r M P , H ay ne s H A , e t. a /.:

D elay ed hyp ersensitiv ity in H odgk in ’s d isease -

a s tud y o f 10 3 un trea ted pa tie n ts . A m 7 M ed

52:63-72 1972

3. E ilber F R , N izze JA , M o rton D L: S eq ue n tia l

ev alu atio n of gene ral im m une com pe ten ce in

cance r p a tien ts: co rrela tion w ith c lin ica l cou rse .

C ancer 35 :6 60 -66 5, 1975

4. E ilb e r FR , M orto n D L , K e tch am A S : Im m u no-

lo g ic abno rm a litie s in head and n eck cance r.

. .lm 7 S u r g 12 8 :534 -538 , 1974

5. R oth JA , E ilbe r F R , M orton D L : E ffec t o f

su rge ry on in v itro lym pho cy te fun ctio n . S u r g

Forum 25:102-104 1974

6 . H ersh E M : M o difica tion o f ho st de fense m ech a-

n ism s, in C ancer M ed icine , ed ited by H olland

JF , F re i E , P h ilade lph ia, L ea & F eb ige r, 1973 ,

p p 6 8 1-699

7. C o sim i A B , B run ste tter F H , K em m ere r W T ,

M iller B N : C e llu la r im m u ne com pe ten ce o f

bre a st c a nc er p at ien ts re c eiv ing rad io the rap y .

Arch Surg 107:531 535 ‘973

8. T h om a s JW , C o y P , L e w is H S , Y u e n A : E ffe ct

o f th erapeu tic irrad ia tio n on ly m ph ocy te tran s-

fo rm atio n in lun g cance r. C a n c e r 27 10 46-10 50,

1 9 7 1

9 . G hosse in N A , B o sw orth JL , B ases R E : T he

e ffect o f rad ica l rad io th erapy o n d elayed h ype r-

sensitiv ity and th e in flam m ato ry re sp onse.

Cancer 35:1616-1620 1975

10 . C l e m e n t JA , K ram er S : Im m un ocom pe ten ce in

pa tien ts w ith so lid tum o rs un de rg o ing co ba lt 6 0

irradiation. Cancer 34:193 -19 6, 197 4

I I. G ros s L , M anfred i O L , P ro tos A : E ffec t o f co -

ba lt 60 irra d ia tion up on c ell-m ed ia te d im mu n ity .

R ad io log y 1 06:65 3 -65 5 , 1973

1 2. M o rto n D L : C a n ce r im m un o th era py : an ov er-

v iew . Sem in O n co lo gy i 29 7 -3I0 , 19 74

13 . M o rto n D L , E ilb er F R , H olm es E C , H un t JS ,

K e tc ha m A S , S ilv ers te in M J, S pa rks F C : B C G

Page 6: Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

8/12/2019 Chemotherapy Therapy (Larynx Cancer)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chemotherapy-therapy-larynx-cancer 6/6

C H E M O IM M U N O T H E R A P Y IN H E A D A N D N E C K L E S IO N S 1087

im m un o the rap y of m e lanom a: su m m ary of

seven yea r exp erience. A n n S u rg   8o :635 -643 ,

‘974

14 . G utte rm an JU , M av lig it G , G o ttleib JA :

C h em oim m uno the rap y of d issem in ated m a lig -nan t m e lanom a w ith d im e thy l tria zen o im ida -

zo le ca rbo xo m ide (D T IC ) an d B a cillu s C a l-

m e tte -G uer in . N E ng l 7 M ed 2 91 5 92 -5 97 1 97 4

15 . D ona lds on R C : M eth o trex ate p lu s B ac i l lu s

Ca lme t te -Guer in (B C G ) an d iso n ia z id in th e

tre atm e n t o f ca nc er o f th e he ad a n d n ec k . ur n 7

S u r g 124:527-534 1972

i6 . D on a ld son R C : C hem oim m un otherapy fo r can-

cer o f the head and neck . A m 7 S u rg 126:507-

512 1973

17 . B leumink E , N a te r JP , K o ops H S , T ite T H : A

sta nda rd m e tho d for D N C B sensitiz a tion te stin gin pa tien ts w ith neop lasm s. C a n c e r 3 3  9I 1-9 15 ,

‘974

 8. Je sse R H , L indb e rg R D : E ff icacy o f com b in ing

rad ia tion th e rapy w ith su rg ica l p ro cedu re s in

pat ien ts w ith ce rv ica l m e ta stas is from squ am ou s

ca n ce r o f th e o rop ha ryn x an d h yp op ha ryn x .

Cancer 35:1163-1166 97