chesapeake bay policy committee meeting bay program water quality goals: focus on funding presented...
TRANSCRIPT
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee
Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding
Presented to COG Board of DirectorsSeptember 10, 2003
COG Board - 9/10/03 2
Recommendations in Brief
• Actively pursue funding support– Wastewater– Urban stormwater– Agriculture
• Expand education and outreach efforts
COG Board - 9/10/03 3
Presentation Outline
• Introduction – Bruce Williams
• Setting the Stage – Penelope Gross
• Funding: Wastewater & Stormwater – J Davis
• Funding: Agriculture – John Lovell
• Recommendations – Bruce Williams
COG Board - 9/10/03 4
1 in 4 of the Bay watershed’s residents lives in the COG region
Section I: Setting the Stage
COG region critical to Bay Program’s success
Region’s 2000 population – 4.2 million
About 25% of the people in the Bay watershed
About 80% of the people in Potomac watershed
Region’s 2030 projected population – 6.1 million
COG Board - 9/10/03 5
Consistent COG Region Support
• 1987 – Reduce nutrients by 40 %
• 1992 – Reaffirmation of 40 % goal
• 1998 – Board creates the Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee
• 2000 - C2K Agreement sets new goal
- COG Board resolution in support
COG Board - 9/10/03 6
Wastewater has Led the Way
0
5
10
15
20
25
1985 2000 2003
Total nitrogen millionlbs./year
COG Region wastewater plants reduced nitrogen discharges 55 % from 1985 levels
COG Board - 9/10/03 7
Fundamental C2K Commitment
“By 2010, correct the nutrient- and sediment-related problems in the Bay and its tidal tributaries sufficiently to
remove the Bay and tidal portions of its tributaries from the list of impaired waters under the Clean Water Act”
COG Board - 9/10/03 8
A Long Way to Go for C2K
Graph showing 200 progress and 2010cap for N and P in COG region
TN Loads Delivered to Bay
335
285
175
500
100
200
300
400
1985 Base 2000 Progress C2K Load Allocation Pristine
mill
ion
s o
f p
ou
nd
s
COG Board - 9/10/03 9
Cost of Meeting C2K
IMPLEMENTING C2K (FY 2003-2010) Source: Chesapeake Bay Commission
Projected Costs: $18.7 BProjected Income: $ 5.9 B
Funding Gap: $12.8 B or $ 1.6 B/yr
Preliminary analysis indicate significant impacts on wastewater rates, stormwater fees and farm costs
COG Board - 9/10/03 10
Regulatory Program Could Raise Costs
• Framework exists for regulatory approach– Backstop for “nonregulatory” goal– TMDLs and permitting
• Permit conditions could mean much more conservative treatment plant design
• Cost-share grants may not be available for mandated requirements
• Most of $12.8 billion funding gap could become local government responsibility
COG Board - 9/10/03 11
In Short
• Fight to preserve “nonregulatory” characteristics to the extent possible– Agreements rather than permit conditions; or– More flexible permit conditions
• Fight to maximize state and federal contributions
COG Board - 9/10/03 12
Section II: Wastewater & Stormwater Funding
• Equity = Share funding burden among federal, state and local partners
• Success has been greatest where this has occurred
COG Board - 9/10/03 13
Cooperative Funding for BNR
• BNR implementation at region’s wastewater plants was based on availability of cost-share funds
COG Board - 9/10/03 14
No Cooperative Funding for Stormwater
• Little state or federal money for urban stormwater management
COG Board - 9/10/03 15
State Funding Prospects
• MD has identified up to $80 million to be used for wastewater upgrades through FY 2008– 2004 budget represents an increase
• VA has funding deficit; no new funds identified
• Both states: little funding for stormwater retrofits
COG Board - 9/10/03 16
Federal Funding Prospects
• Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Reduction Act– Cost share funding for wastewater plants– Lacks Congressional support
• Bay Commission proposed funding stormwater under highway funding bill– Status quo in FY 04 budget– New legislation anticipated next year
COG Board - 9/10/03 17
Alternative Funding Approaches
• Chesapeake Bay Foundation has floated idea for regional authority with taxing powers
• Long Island Sound restoration program• Everglades restoration program
COG Board - 9/10/03 18
In Short
• Several state & federal concepts are being considered
• COG staff is tracking progress and participating where feasible
• Anticipate specific proposals to come to the COG Board
COG Board - 9/10/03 19
Section III: Agricultural Funding
• Why is it important to COG region?
COG Board - 9/10/03 20
Ag Sources in COG Region
Majority of nutrients in the COG region are from wastewater and stormwater sources
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Washington-area load Potential load allocation
Ag
Urban
Wastewater
COG Board - 9/10/03 21
Ag Sources in Bay Watershed
BAY 2000 TN LOADSTN=285 million lbs/yr
wastewater urban stormwateragriculture forestseptic other
Ag Baywide, agriculture is
the largest source of
nutrients and sediment
COG Board - 9/10/03 22
Ag Progress Critical
• Reductions from ag sector help meet equity– Reducing ag loads can be cost effective
approach
• Agriculture is a potential nutrient trading partner with urban sources– This may become increasingly important as
population continues to grow
COG Board - 9/10/03 23
Ag Funding Opportunity
• Substantial state & federal funding available• 2002 Farm Bill includes provision for Bay
restoration– Authorizes up to $20 million/year for 5 years for
innovative practices• USDA has not yet implemented the program
COG Board - 9/10/03 24
In Short
• New innovative agricultural programs have been authorized
• COG should support implementation
COG Board - 9/10/03 25
Section IV: Recommendations
• Actively pursue federal and state funding for all sectors
• CBPC will seek Board approval to support specific proposals in the best interests of COG members – “Equity” and “Voluntary” remain key
principles
COG Board - 9/10/03 26
Wastewater Funding Recommendation
• Advocate for federal and state financial assistance for wastewater plant upgrades
• Work with COG stakeholders to craft specific program provisions
COG Board - 9/10/03 27
Urban Stormwater Funding Recommendation
• Advocate for stormwater financial assistance under highway funding bill
• Work with COG stakeholders (including TPB) to craft specific provisions
COG Board - 9/10/03 28
Ag Funding Recommendation
• Support full funding of the Farm Bill program for the Bay
• Work with COG stakeholders to develop nutrient trading program
COG Board - 9/10/03 29
Next Steps
• Move for adoption of Resolution R39-03
• Accelerate education and outreach efforts– Local government officials– Citizen groups– Note: COG’s Bay video available soon