chesapeake bay program model update rich batiuk associate director for science u.s. epa chesapeake...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
223 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chesapeake Bay Program
Model Update
Rich BatiukAssociate Director for Science
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program
![Page 2: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about
Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling But Were Afraid to Ask a
Modeler
![Page 3: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Role of Models
Modeling
Research Monitoring
Management
Power
ClarityWhat is the concentration?What are the filtering rates?Where are the streams?
What is the environmentaleffect of any particularmanagement scheme?
How do we balance manydifferent interests?
![Page 4: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CBP Modeling Structure
Watershed Model
Chesapeake Bay Estuary Model Package
Regional Acid Deposition Model
![Page 5: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Purpose of Watershed Model
Results help direct tributary strategy development What’s the impact of BMP implementation on
Nitrogen/Phosphorus/Sediment loads? What yields the biggest bang and the biggest
bang for the buck?
Load allocations Equitably account for all load sources.
Measure of cap maintenance
![Page 6: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Purpose of Watershed Model
Provide loads to the Estuarine Model
What’s the impact of BMP implementation on living resources water quality?
What yields the biggest bang and the biggest bang for the buck?
Remove impairments by 2010
![Page 7: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Watershed Model Inputs
Nutrient Applications to Agricultural Land
Landuses Non-Point Source BMP Implementation Point Sources Septic Loads Atmospheric Deposition
![Page 8: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Watershed Model Inputs
Nutrient Applications to Agricultural Land
Landuses Non-Point Source BMP Implementation Point SourcesPoint Sources Septic LoadsSeptic Loads Atmospheric DepositionAtmospheric Deposition
![Page 9: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Watershed Model Simulation
Input Data
Land Simulation
River Simulation
Output
Opportunities for BMPs
![Page 10: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Watershed Model Nonpoint Source BMPs
Agricultural BMPs How Credited TN Efficiency TP Efficiency SED Efficiency
Conservation Tillage Landuse Conversion N/A N/A N/A
Riparian Forest Buffers (Agriculture)
Landuse Conversion + Efficiency
25-85% depending on hydrogeomorphic region
50-75% depending on hydrogeomorphic region
50-75% depending on hydrogeomorphic region
Riparian Grass Buffers (Agriculture)
Landuse Conversion + Efficiency
17-58%depending on hydrogeomorphic region
50-75%depending on hydrogeomorphic region
50-75%depending on hydrogeomorphic region
Wetland Restoration (Agriculture)
Currently Solely Landuse Conversion
Same as riparian forest buffers
Same as riparian forest buffers
Same as riparian forest buffers
Land Retirement (Agriculture)
Landuse Conversion N/A N/A N/A
Tree Planting (Row Crop) Landuse Conversion N/A N/A N/A
Nutrient Management Plan Implementation (Crop)
Built into Simulation Under Review Under Review N/A
Conservation Plans (Excluding Conservation-Tillage and Nutrient Management) Total OR Reported by the Following Landuses:
Conservation Planson Conventional-Till
Efficiency 8% 15% 25%
Conservation Planson Conservation-Till
Efficiency 3% 5% 8%
Conservation Plans on Hay Efficiency 3% 5% 8%Conservation Plans on
PastureEfficiency 5% 10% 14%
![Page 11: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Agricultural BMPs How Credited TN Efficiency TP Efficiency SED Efficiency
Cover Crops
Cover Crops on Conventional-Till
Efficiency30-45%
depending on planting date
7-15%
depending on planting date 10-20%
depending on planting date
Cover Crops on Conservation-Till
Efficiency30-45%
depending on planting date 0% 0%
Commodity Cereal Cover Crops
Efficiency17-25%
depending on planting date 0% 0%
Animal Waste Management Systems:
Livestock Systems – Designate types of
systems with associations to the number of Animal
Units and types of animals each system is handling
Efficiency 75% 75% N/A
Poultry Systems – Designate types of
systems with associations to the number of Animal
Units and types of animals each system is handling
Efficiency 20% 20% N/A
Barnyard Runoff Control / Loafing Lot Management - Designate types of runoff controls with associations to the number of Animal
Units and types of animals
Efficiency
20%
(10% Supplemental)
20%
(10% Supplemental)
40%
Watershed Model Nonpoint Source BMPs
![Page 12: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Agricultural BMPs How Credited TN Efficiency TP Efficiency SED Efficiency
Alternative Uses of Manure / Manure Transport
Built into PreprocessorReduction in nutrient
mass applied to cropland
Reduction in nutrient mass applied to
croplandN/A
Off-stream Watering with Stream Fencing (Pasture)
Efficiency 60% 60% 75%
Off-stream Watering without Fencing (Pasture)
Efficiency 30% 30% 38%
Off-stream Watering with Stream Fencing and Rotational Grazing
(Pasture)
Efficiency 20% 20% 40%
Watershed Model Nonpoint Source BMPs
![Page 13: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Urban and Mixed Open BMPs
How Credited TN Efficiency TP Efficiency SED Efficiency
Stormwater Management Reported by the Following
Categories:
Wet Ponds and Wetlands Efficiency 30% 50% 80%Dry Detention Ponds and Hydrodynamic Structures
Efficiency 5% 10% 10%
Dry Extended Detention Ponds
Efficiency 30% 20% 60%
Infiltration Practices Efficiency 50% 70% 90%
Filtering Practices Efficiency 40% 60% 85%Roadway Systems TBD Under Review Under Review Under Review
Impervious Surface Reduction / Non-Structural
PracticesLanduse Conversion N/A N/A N/A
Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Inserts
TBD Under Review Under Review Under Review
Stream Restoration Load Reduction 0.02 lbs/ft 0.0035 lbs/ft 2.55 lbs/ft
Watershed Model Nonpoint Source BMPs
![Page 14: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Urban and Mixed Open BMPs
How Credited TN Efficiency TP Efficiency SED Efficiency
Erosion and Sediment Control
Efficiency 33% 50% 50%
Nutrient Management (Urban)
Efficiency 17% 22% N/A
Forest Conservation (Urban)
Landuse Conversion N/A N/A N/A
Riparian Forest Buffers (Urban)
Landuse Conversion + Efficiency 25% 50% 50%
Riparian Grass Buffers (Urban)
Landuse Conversion N/A N/A N/A
Tree Planting (Urban) Landuse Conversion N/A N/A N/A
Abandoned Mine Reclamation
Landuse Conversion N/A N/A N/A
Riparian Forest Buffers / Tree Planting (Mixed
Open)Landuse Conversion N/A N/A N/A
Nutrient Management (Mixed Open)
Efficiency 17% 22% N/A
Watershed Model Nonpoint Source BMPs
![Page 15: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Resource BMPs How Credited TN Efficiency TP Efficiency SED Efficiency
Forest Harvesting Practices
Efficiency 50% 50% 50%
Structural Tidal Shoreline Erosion Control
Water Quality Model N/A N/A N/A
Non-Structural Tidal Shoreline Erosion Control
Water Quality Model N/A N/A N/A
Septic BMPs How Credited TN Efficiency TP Efficiency SED Efficiency
Septic Connections/Hookups
Removal of Systems N/A N/A N/A
Septic Denitrification Efficiency 50% N/A N/A
Septic Pumping Efficiency 5% N/A N/A
Watershed Model Nonpoint Source BMPs
![Page 16: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Animal Feed Additives Yield Reserve Manure Additives Horse Pasture Management Carbon Sequesteration Mortality Composters Ammonia Emissions Controls in Animal Agriculture Voluntary Air Emission Controls within the Jurisdicitons
(Utility, Industrial and Mobile) Street Sweeping Alternative Uses of Manure Alternative Cropping Systems/Ag Operations SAV Planting/Restoration; Oyster Reef Restoration
NPS BMPs Efforts Not Currently Credited in the Model…But on the List
![Page 17: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Adding to the “Approved”BMP List
Review/approval through the Bay Program’s Tributary Strategy Workgroup
BMP definition Recommended efficiency with technical
literature documentation How the BMP will be handled by the
watershed model How the BMP will be tracked (units,
acres, etc.)
![Page 18: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Opportunities for BMPs
BMPs that revise inputs Alternative uses of manure Nutrient applications to croplandNutrient applications to cropland BMPs involving landuse conversionsBMPs involving landuse conversions
BMPs with nutrient and sediment BMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficienciesreduction efficiencies
BMPs with both BMPs with both landuse conversions landuse conversions and reduction efficienciesand reduction efficiencies
![Page 19: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Manure Applications to Cropland
Pasture
Beef
Uncollected
Collected
Spring/FallApplications
Monthly Applications
Crop
Enclosure
Barnyard
Volatilization
Volatilization
Monthly Applications
Storage
VolatilizationVolatilization
Volatilization
RunoffRunoff Runoff
DairySwineLayers
BroilersTurkeys
![Page 20: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Alternative Uses of Manure
9.548 3.8020
2
4
6
8
10
12
Nitrogen Phosphorus
(mill
ion
lbs/
year
)
Pre-BMP Nutrients Available for Crop Applications in DelawarePost-BMP Nutrients Applied to Cropland in Delaware
•Alternative uses of manure encompasses removing from the Chesapeake Bay watershed nutrients available for crop applications. •Jurisdictions need to track where the nutrients are removed from, how much, and manure/litter nutrient content.
![Page 21: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Opportunities for BMPs
BMPs that revise inputs Alternative uses of manureAlternative uses of manure Nutrient applications to cropland BMPs involving landuse conversionsBMPs involving landuse conversions
BMPs with nutrient and sediment BMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficienciesreduction efficiencies
BMPs with both BMPs with both landuse conversions landuse conversions and reduction efficienciesand reduction efficiencies
![Page 22: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Nutrient Applications to Cropland
2.8840
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Nutrient Management Plan Implementation
(mill
ion
acre
s)
2001 Implementation Level 2001 Theoretical Maximum Implementation
•BMP implementation levels tracked by state agencies and submitted to CBPO.•Nutrient Management Plan Implementation is a separate module in the Watershed Model where crops receive only 130% of need/uptake for both nitrogen and phosphorus. •Yellow areas represent “windows of opportunity” for traditional or tracked practices.
![Page 23: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Mineral
CropNeed
AtDep
Fertilizer
Manure
30% CropNeed
Mineral
CropNeed
AtDep
Fertilizer
Manure
30% CropNeed
Nutrient Management Plan Implementation
•Watershed Model accounts for both N- and P-based nutrient management.•Fertilizer application data from state agricultural agencies.
![Page 24: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Mineral
CropNeedAtDep
Fertilizer
Manure30% Crop
Need Manure
Mineral
AtDepCropNeed
30% CropNeed Manure
Mineral
AtDepCropNeed
30% CropNeed
Move
Nutrient Management Plan Implementation
Watershed Model accounts for both N- and P-based nutrient management.
![Page 25: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Opportunities for BMPs
BMPs that revise inputs Alternative uses of manureAlternative uses of manure Nutrient applications to croplandNutrient applications to cropland BMPs involving landuse conversions
BMPs with nutrient and sediment BMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficienciesreduction efficiencies
BMPs with both BMPs with both landuse conversions landuse conversions and reduction efficienciesand reduction efficiencies
![Page 26: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
•Light orange generally represents agricultural land in 1990 EPA EMAP / LANSAT-derived imagery. •Source of agricultural land categories and area in the model is U.S. Department of Agriculture “Census of Agriculture” - Published 1982/1987/1992/1997.•County Census information is distributed to model segments.•Agricultural land area projections directed by states.•In 2001, agricultural land covered about 9.4 million acres or 23% of the total Bay watershed area.•The watershed model estimates that agriculture accounts for 40% of the TN load, 47% of the TP load, and 62% of the land-based sediment load to the Bay in 2001.
![Page 27: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Agricultural BMPs Involving Landuse Conversions
1.934 0.045 0.076 0.008 0.005 0.0000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
ConservationTillage
Land Retirement Conventional Tillto Pasture
Tree Planting WetlandRestoration
Pasture to MixedOpen
(mill
ion
acre
s)
2001 Implementation Level 2001 Theoretical Maximum Implementation
•BMP implementation levels tracked by state agencies and submitted to CBPO.•Load reductions attributed to movement to a lower-exporting landuse. •Yellow areas represent “windows of opportunity” for traditional or tracked practices.
![Page 28: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Opportunities for BMPs
BMPs that revise inputsBMPs that revise inputs Alternative uses of manureAlternative uses of manure Nutrient applications to croplandNutrient applications to cropland BMPs involving landuse conversionsBMPs involving landuse conversions
BMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficiencies
BMPs with both BMPs with both landuse conversions landuse conversions and reduction efficienciesand reduction efficiencies
![Page 29: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Agricultural BMPs with Reduction Efficiencies
3.476 0.118 0.107 0.047 0.028 0.005
N = 3-8%P = 5-15%
SED = 8-25%
N = 20%P = 20%
SED = 40%
N = 30-45%P = 0-15%
SED = 0-20%N = 60%P = 60%
SED = 75%
N = 30%P = 30%
SED = 38%
N = 20-75%P = 20-75%
SED = 0-40%
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Farm Plans Grazing LandProtection
Cover Crops Stream ProtectionWith Fencing
Stream ProtectionWithout Fencing
Animal WasteManagement
(Manure Acres)
(mill
ion
acre
s)
2001 Implementation Level 2001 Theoretical Maximum Implementation
•BMP implementation levels tracked by state agencies and submitted to CBPO.•BMP efficiencies for removing N, P, and SED are collaboration of TSWG participants after review of literature or agency/extension service recommendations.•Yellow areas represent “windows of opportunity” for traditional or tracked practices.
![Page 30: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
BMP Implementation
How “Efficiency” BMPs Are Credited In The Model
Reduction = acres treated by BMP * BMP efficiency
total segment acres
By Landuse and Model Segment
![Page 31: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
BMP Implementation How “Efficiency” BMPs Are Credited In The Model
BMPs that cannot be applied to same landuse• Mutually exclusive – Additive in nutrient reduction
capabilities• i.e., streambank protection with and without
protection
Several BMPs on same landuse Consecutive• One BMP reduces the nutrients available for
subsequent BMPs Multiplicative in nutrient reduction
• i.e., forest buffers downhill from cover crops
![Page 32: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Opportunities for BMPs
BMPs that revise inputsBMPs that revise inputs Alternative uses of manureAlternative uses of manure Nutrient applications to croplandNutrient applications to cropland BMPs involving landuse conversionsBMPs involving landuse conversions
BMPs with nutrient and sediment BMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficienciesreduction efficiencies
BMPs with both landuse conversions and reduction efficiencies
![Page 33: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
BMPs with Landuse Conversions and Reduction Efficiencies
16.8 4.6
N = 17-58%P = 50-75%
SED = 50-75%
N = 25-85%P = 50-75%
SED = 50-75%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Riparian Forest Buffers Riparian Grass Buffers
(tho
usan
d ac
res)
2001 Implementation Level 2001 Theoretical Maximum Implementation
•Riparian buffer efficiencies are being revised so that they will vary according to hydro-geomorphic region. •Yellow areas represent “windows of opportunity” and assume 100-ft. buffer widths on all un-buffered stream-miles associated with agricultural land.
![Page 34: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Model BMP Simulation
Input Data
Land Simulation
River Simulation
Output
Opportunities for BMPs
![Page 35: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Chesapeake Bay Program
Phase 4.3 Watershed Model
Simulation
![Page 36: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Watershed Model
64,000 square miles 9 Landuses 94 Segments 133 State-segment 464 County-segments 9 Major Tributaries 20 State-Basins 31 Tributary Strategy Basins
![Page 37: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Lumped Parameter Physically-Based Model
![Page 38: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Loading Sources in Watershed Model
Pasture Hay
ImperviousUrban
ConservationTill
PerviousUrbanForest
ConventionalTill Manure
RIVER REACH
AtmosphericDeposition
Point SourceSeptic
![Page 39: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Atmospheric Deposition, Manure,
Chemical Fertilizer
DenitrificationVolatilization
Export to Streams
Uptake byCrops
Ground Water
SurfaceInterflow
Lower ZoneGround Water
SurfaceInterflow
Lower Zone
Land Simulation – 1 Acre
Water Simulation - Physically BasedPrecipitation (time series)
Percolation - f(soil properties, slope, temp)
Evapotranspiration - f(time series, land properties)
Runoff - f(soil properties, slope, temp)
![Page 40: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Nutrient and Sediment Simulation
Meteorology Precipitation
Runoff andGroundwater
LandMorphology
NitrogenCycle
SedimentExport
PhosphorusCycle
Nutrient Inputs
![Page 41: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Nutrient Simulation
NitrogenCycle
![Page 42: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Watershed Model Forest Nitrogen Cycle
Trees
Roots Leaves
ParticulateRefractoryOrganic N
ParticulateLabile
Organic N
SolutionAmmonia
Nitrate
SolutionLabile
Organic N
AdsorbedAmmonia
SolutionRefractoryOrganic N
Atm
osp
heric
Deposition
Denitrification
ExportExport
ExportExport ExportExport ExportExportExportExport ExportExport ExportExport
![Page 43: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Agriculture Nutrient BalanceAtmospheric Deposition,
Manure, Chemical Fertilizer
DenitrificationVolatilization
Export to Streams
Uptake byCrops
![Page 44: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Forest Nutrient BalanceAtmosphericDeposition
DenitrificationVolatilization
Export to Streams
![Page 45: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Urban Nutrient BalanceAtmosphericDeposition,Other sources
DenitrificationVolatilization
Export to Streams
Uptake bygrasses
![Page 46: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Land-Water Connection
X 3000 acres
X 400 acres
X 100 acres
X 200 acres
X 900 acres X 1500 acresX 300 acres
Forest
PerviousUrban
ImperviousUrban
ConventionalTill
ConservationTill
Hay Pasture
![Page 47: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Land-Water Connection
X 3000 acres
X 400 acres
X 100 acres
X 200 acres
X 900 acres X 1500 acresX 300 acres
Forest
PerviousUrban
ImperviousUrban
ConventionalTill
ConservationTill
Hay Pasture
Deposition, Point Source,
Septic
![Page 48: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Precipitation or percolation
Percolation
Evapotranspiration
RO
(time series)
f(soil properties, slope, temp)
f(time series,land properties)
f(soil properties, slope, temp)
Water Simulation - Physically Based
![Page 49: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
River Simulation - Nitrogen
Algae
ORGN
NO3
}
Sediment
NH3 River 1
River 2 River
3
![Page 50: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Two Points of Calibration
Land Surface
RainRiver Reach
![Page 51: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
![Page 53: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
![Page 54: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
![Page 55: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Chesapeake Bay Program
Atmospheric Deposition Model And Impacts of Deposition on Loads
![Page 56: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Atmospheric Deposition Model
![Page 57: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
![Page 58: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Atmospheric Deposition Model
P4ms5 - 66 - 77 - 88 - 99 - 1010 - 1111 - 1212 - 1313 - 14
•Deposition to the watershed is calculated from monitoring data – NADP nutrient concentrations / precipitation. •The Regional Acid Deposition Model (RADM) changes deposition to the watershed based on changes in emissions throughout the airshed from utility, mobile, and industrial sources.
![Page 59: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Nitrogen Deposition Versus Delivered Load
462.7
305.2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2000 Progress
(million lb
s/ye
ar)
Atmospheric Deposition Delivered Load
Atmospheric Inputs:Of the total NOx deposition to the Chesapeake Bay watershed land area, about 50% originates from emissions in Bay-watershed states:__________________PA = 17%, VA = 10%, MD = 9%, WV = 7%, NY = 5%, DE = 1%OH, NC, NY, KY, IN, TN, MI = 27%Other States in 37-State Area = 24% Delivered Loads From All Sources:Of the total nitrogen load delivered to the Chesapeake Bay watershed, about 32% is attributable to atmospheric deposition, based on the proportion of anthropogenic inputs.
![Page 60: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Nitrogen Deposition Versus Delivered Load
462.7
386.9
344.0
310.1284.6
305.2 294.2 286.5 279.4 274.8
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2000 Progress 2010 emissions w/ozone-season NOx SIP
call
2020 emissions w/seasonal NOx SIP call +
all-year "Tier II" &heavy duty diesel
regulations
2020 emissions w/annual CAA +
aggressive utilitycontrols
2020 emissions w/annual CAA +
aggressive utility,mobile, & industrial
controls
(million lb
s/ye
ar)
Atmospheric Deposition Delivered Load
For all air scenarios, landuses, fertilizer applications, point sources, septic, and BMP implementation are held constant at 2000 levels - Only atmospheric deposition varies
![Page 61: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Model BMP Simulation
Input Data
Land Simulation
River Simulation
Output
Opportunities for BMPs
![Page 62: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
1985 Versus 2001 and Cap Load Allocations
Nutrient and Sediment Loads Delivered to the Chesapeake
BayBy Major Tributary
![Page 63: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Nitrogen Loads Delivered to the Chesapeake Bay
135.34
30.20 28.25
5.02
70.80
9.73 9.13
46.71
2.35
120.98
22.75
15.78
4.08
58.43
7.73 7.70
35.68
2.05
76.25
13.6811.10
2.38
34.32
5.05 5.51
25.74
1.11
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Susquehanna Eastern ShoreMD
Western ShoreMD
Patuxent Potomac Rappahannock York James Eastern ShoreVA
(million p
ounds
TN
per
yea
r)
1985 2001 Progress Cap Load Allocation
![Page 64: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Phosphorus Loads Delivered to the Chesapeake Bay
5.11
3.09
1.96
0.51
5.30
1.27 1.18
8.48
0.22
4.00
1.89
0.93
0.28
4.22
0.920.77
5.55
0.21
2.52
1.140.84
0.21
3.48
0.620.48
3.42
0.08
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Susquehanna Eastern ShoreMD
Western ShoreMD
Patuxent Potomac Rappahannock York James Eastern ShoreVA
(million p
ounds
TP p
er y
ear)
1985 2001 Progress Cap Load Allocation
![Page 65: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Land-Based Sediment Loads Delivered to the Chesapeake Bay
1.178
0.382
0.164 0.201
2.033
0.418
0.158
1.278
0.021
1.027
0.299
0.129 0.129
1.721
0.331
0.125
1.193
0.018
0.962
0.1630.100 0.095
1.494
0.288
0.103
0.935
0.0080.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Susquehanna Eastern ShoreMD
Western ShoreMD
Patuxent Potomac Rappahannock York James Eastern ShoreVA
(million t
ons
SED
per
yea
r)
1985 2001 Progress Land-Based Sediment Cap Load Allocation
![Page 66: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Phase 5 Calibration
Phase 4.3 – 26 calibration stations
Phase 5.0 – 236 hydrology and 100+ water quality calibration stations
![Page 67: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Old vs. New Segments
![Page 68: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Phase 5 Improvements
Segmentation Calibration Land cover/land use (2000, year by
year) Rainfall Atmospheric Deposition Urban BMPs (seasonality, extreme weather
events, design life considerations) Lots more…so stay tuned!
![Page 69: Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d395503460f94a12dfe/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Send Donuts to:
Rich Batiuk
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office
410-267-5731
www.chesapeakebay.net