children's rights and journalism practice - a rights-based perspective
TRANSCRIPT
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS AND JOURNALISM
PRACTICE - A RIGHTS-BASED
PERSPECTIVE
Teachers’ Guide
Syllabus commissioned by UNICEF Regional Office for Central and Eastern Europe
and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CEE/CIS)
© UNICEF - Dublin Institute of Technology 2007
2
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION TO MODULE ................................................................................. 3
TEACHING METHODS ........................................................................................... 4
PEDAGOGICAL PRINCIPLES ............................................................................ 5
OUTCOMES AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................... 9
METHODOLOGIES ........................................................................................... 11
BLENDED LEARNING ..................................................................................... 15
ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................... 18
ORGANISATION OF THE MODULE .................................................................. 24
TEACHERS’ NOTES FOR INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS ........................................ 26
3
INTRODUCTION TO MODULE This syllabus document attempts to bring together theory and practice, so that
the journalism students who complete it are not only skilled in covering the
important area of children‘s rights, but are also able to reflect on that practice
and offer a critique of the situation concerning children‘s rights in their own
country and internationally. The authors also hope that the unit offers
transferable knowledge and skills. Students who successfully complete the
syllabus will have a knowledge of the whole area of rights, ethics as well as how
to handle sources, news and write stories with sensitivity, but also with an
awareness of the publics‘ right to know and where boundaries lie. Students
should discuss and analyse issues such as where a journalist might have a right
to publish but a responsibility not to, or where does sensitivity cross a boundary
into self-censorship.
The material included in this package can be used in a number of ways. Lecturers
might wish to give it to students to read before class so as to inform a discussion
and debate, give out an edited version or use as class notes
The syllabus itself is intended to be flexible and adaptable to the appropriate
delivery methods designed by the lecturers who facilitate it in conjunction with
their students. However, successful achievement of the learning outcomes and
objectives is reliant on certain pedagogical principles and methodologies forming
the basis of any adapted delivery method. The next section on teaching methods
should inform and guide the design and approach to delivering this module.
4
TEACHING METHODS Children‘s rights and journalism - a rights based perspective is a module
underpinned by two prominent pedagogical principles; Student Centered Learning
(SCL) and Human Rights Education (HRE). Both of these principles entail distinct
but complementary theories, objectives and pedagogical methodologies which are
outlined in the following sections. Lecturers can use these sections as a guide to
inform their own delivery of the material, or they can adapt the examples
provided to design their own approach.
Where SCL develops autonomy and responsibility in the students engaged in
active and deep learning, HRE employs SCL in its participatory methodology and
also encourages the development of values and the taking of action to promote
rights. Thus the methodology of the educative process in the context of children‘s
rights for journalism becomes as important as the content itself.
5
PEDAGOGICAL PRINCIPLES
Student centered learning (SCL)
Where teacher-centered learning strategies focus on the teacher transmitting
knowledge from the expert to the novice, student-centered learning focuses on
the students taking action to achieve their own learning. In a student centered
learning environment, knowledge is constructed by the students themselves and
the teacher or lecturer is a facilitator of learning rather than a presenter of
information. In this role, the facilitator is a leader who is perceived as an
authority figure in the situation, is sufficiently secure within herself (himself) and
in her (his) relationship to others that she (he) experiences an essential trust in
the capacity of others to think for themselves, to learn for themselves.
Student centred learning (SCL) increases the responsibility of the learners for
their own learning. It involves students in the decision-making processes, and
they learn by doing, rather than just by listening and performing tasks which are
often not in context and therefore ‗unreal‘ to them. Because learning becomes
more active (rather than passively listening to the teacher), it becomes more
memorable: because it is personalized, and relevant to the students‘ own lives
and experiences, it brings content ‗alive‘, and makes it relevant to the real world.
SCL is characterized by the following features:
o The reliance on active rather than passive learning,
o An emphasis on deep learning and understanding,
o Increased responsibility and accountability on the part of the student,
o An increased sense of autonomy in the learner
o An interdependence between teacher and learner,
o Mutual respect within the learner teacher relationship,
o And a reflexive approach to the teaching and learning process on the part
of both teacher and learner.
The main principles of student-centered learning can be summarized in the
following points:
o The learner has full responsibility for her/his learning
o Involvement and participation are necessary for learning
o The relationship between learners is more equal, promoting growth,
development
o The teacher becomes a facilitator and resource person
6
o The learner experiences confluence in his education (affective and
cognitive domains flow together)
(O‘Neill & McMahon, 2005)
Human Rights Education (HRE)
Human rights education can be defined as education, training and information
aiming at building a universal culture of human rights through the sharing of
knowledge, imparting of skills and moulding of attitudes directed to:
o The strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms;
o The full development of the human personality and the sense of its
dignity;
o The promotion of understanding, tolerance, gender equality and friendship
among all nations, indigenous peoples and racial, national, ethnic,
religious and linguistic groups;
o The enabling of all persons to participate effectively in a free and
democratic society governed by the rule of law;
o The building and maintenance of peace;
o The promotion of people-centred sustainable development and social
justice.
Human rights education encompasses:
o Knowledge and skills — learning about human rights and mechanisms for
their protection, as well as acquiring skills to apply them in daily life;
o Values, attitudes and behaviour — developing values and reinforcing
attitudes and behaviour which uphold human rights;
o Action — taking action to defend and promote human rights.
(UNESCO, 2005)
How children’s rights relate to human rights
The special circumstance that childhood brings to every child necessitates special
attention, care and assistance to children. In the area of human rights protection,
this can be translated by interpreting and applying human rights in the light of
the characteristics and needs of children and not of adults. These translations
constitute what is considered as children‘s rights. This means that children‘s
rights are in reality human rights contextualized within the realities that children
experience. (Yeban, 1999)
A rights-based education whether children‘s rights education or human rights
education, has to develop an appropriate methodology where the process
7
becomes the message itself. The thread that links these different forms of
transformative education is the belief in the dignity and well being of each person.
As such, the individual be it a child or an adult, is put at the centre of an
educative process. (Yeban, 1999)
The method recommended for HRE and indeed for children‘s rights education
(CRE), is a participatory pedagogy which is based on the principles outlined below
and advocated by the OHCHR. Participatory methodology incorporates student
centred learning principles and addresses the additional dimensions involved in
rights education of developing values and taking action:
1. Experiential and Activity-Centered: It should be made clear that the object
of study is the critical understanding of the learner 's objective condition and how
human rights operate within such a condition. Learners' prior knowledge must be
elicited to serve as basis for further discussion. Learner-centered activities may
be designed to draw this out of the participants. This means that the activities
should provide the learners with a venue to share and express their experiences
and knowledge.
2. Problem-posing: The facilitator should try to challenge the learners' prior
knowledge by asking questions which try to draw-out inconsistencies or
incoherence in the learners' responses. Such a process encourages learners to
think through their thoughts and forces them to rearrange their thought patterns
to make them more logically consistent and empirically coherent.
3. Participative: The techniques should encourage collective efforts in clarifying
concepts, analyzing themes, and doing the activities. Exposing the learners to the
experiences of others is one way by which one's experience and knowledge may
be expanded, validated, or disproved.
4. Dialectical: It is not enough to just draw-out learners' prior knowledge
(thesis). It is equally important to have them compare it with knowledge from
other sources such as facts, data, statistics, etc. (anti-thesis), and synthesize the
resulting idea(s). Although it is suggested here that participants' interpretation of
their experiences are valid sources of knowledge, it does not mean, however, that
everything is subjectively correct. Their knowledge/experiences as it is, is equally
limited as "fossilized" erudite knowledge. It must compare itself with other
people's interpretations and understandings of their own respective contexts.
8
5. Analytical: It is important that themes emerging from the learner's responses
and the underlying principles which link these themes be identified by the
facilitator and the learners themselves. The facilitator should ask the "why" and
the "how" questions. Such questions make learners think about why things are
and how things come to be. Learners should also be asked how things relate to
one another and how they affect each other. These are the questions which help
learners see what is beyond the apparent.
6. Healing: We cannot promote human rights unless we own it ourselves; unless
we live the principles in our day-to-day experiences. To be consistent in both our
private and public selves might be difficult but not impossible. The intra-personal,
inter-personal and the structural spheres of our lived experiences are inter-
connected and mutually affecting each other. We cannot afford to lose sight of
this wisdom. Liberating human rights pedagogy, makes us see, feel, reflect and
act and inspire ourselves and others. We are personally accountable to our well-
being, a liberating human rights pedagogy provides us the opportunity to
promote our own well-being.
7. Strategic Thinking-Oriented: To be critical and analytical is not enough to
transform society. Human rights pedagogy should also direct people to set their
own goals and to constantly think of creative and strategic ways how goals can be
achieved. There is a need to experiment on new methods in making human rights
a reality. While situations of extreme difficulty abound which disempower even
the best of us, human rights education must convince people that possibilities are
aplenty. People need new ways of thinking to successfully exercise their rights.
8. Goal and Action Oriented Human rights is praxis. It requires the cycle of
action, reflection, action, reflection and so on. Human rights cannot be achieved
overnight but over time. We take little steps at a time. A liberating human rights
pedagogy should teach people how to make their goals more concrete and
achievable. It should also allow people to plan and organize their actions based
on the goals they identified for themselves. Patience, positive thinking and
perseverance are values that are embedded in a liberating human rights
pedagogy.
(Yeban, 2002)
9
OUTCOMES AND OBJECTIVES
The SCL approach to curriculum design employed in this module, and increasingly
practiced in course design internationally, is the writing of learning outcomes or
objectives focusing on what the student will be able to do, rather than on the
content being covered by the teacher. This practice helps to shift the emphasis on
to the learner as opposed to a coverage model by the teacher. It is an emphasis
on the process and competence, rather than content.
Student–centered Learning
Outcomes: Some examples
Traditional Learning Outcomes/
Objectives
By the end of this module: you
(the student) will be able to:
The course will cover:
Outline the principle features of
children‘s rights in the UNCRC
The UNCRC
Critically assess the importance of
codes of practice and editorial
guidelines
Editorial guidelines and codes of
practice
Source: Adapted from O‘Neill & McMahon, 2005
Learning Outcomes
On completion of this module on Children‘s Rights and Journalism – a rights-
based perspective, the student will be able to:
o Understand and be able to outline the principle features of children‘s rights
as outlined in the UNCRC
o Read, analyze and critically evaluate the reporting of issues affecting
children from a rights-based perspective
o Critically assess the relevance and importance of editorial guidelines and
codes of practice in relation to news reporting affecting children
o Make professional judgments regarding journalism practice from a
perspective of children's rights
o Report fairly, accurately and in keeping with the principles of children‘s
rights
CRE Learning Objectives
Children‘s rights education should be based on the following three learning
objectives:
o Knowledge and skills - To receive information and knowledge of children‘s
10
rights and humanitarian standards and acquire skills to apply this
knowledge
o Values, attitudes and behavior – To become sensitized and undergo a
change in negative attitudes or reinforce positive attitudes and behavior in
relation to children‘s rights
o Action - taking action to defend, promote and protect children‘s rights in
the course of their professional duties
(Adapted from UNESCO, 2005)
Facilitating this rights based module and enabling the students to achieve both
the learning outcomes and the children‘s‘ rights education objectives will involve
embracing student centred learning, the participatory methodology and the
necessary transformative nature of rights education. The following changes are to
be expected:
o Behavioural change through self-awareness of formerly unrecognised
assumptions about children and childhood. Change is a process which is
initiated by recognition of conflict with the existing situation and not by
learning a new idea from an ―expert‖. This implies an awareness that
current behaviour is not consistent with the principles of child rights.
o Cultural change through personal change. Personal change does not only
mean behavioural change for it occurs in the context of a culture. It
requires changing one‘s relationship with the larger culture. This may
result in becoming at odds with the way society traditionally view children.
It is necessary that whatever personal change occur in children and adults
alike, it must be supported by the surrounding culture.
o Structural change through creating mechanisms and facilities that
institutionalise personal and cultural changes that are supportive of child
rights.
(Yeban, 2002)
11
METHODOLOGIES
Lecturers should employ strategies to encourage the students to take on a more
active role in acquiring knowledge and skills. The below table highlights a sample
of student–centered learning methods and includes some ideas for lecturers both
within (more teacher–centered) and outside of the lecture format. Lecturers
should consider, however, striving to reduce the amount of lecture contact hours
for more student–centered formats, where possible.
Examples of student centered learning methods
Outside of the lecture format In the lecture
Independent projects Buzz groups (short discussion in twos)
Group discussion Pyramids/snowballing (buzz groups
continuing the discussion into larger
groups)
Peer mentoring of other students Cross-overs (mixing students into
groups by letter/number allocations)
Debates Rounds (giving turns to individual
students to talk)
Field trips Quizzes
Practicals Writing reflections on learning (3/4
minutes)
Reflective diaries, learning journals Student class presentations
Computer assisted learning (CAL) Role play
Choice in subjects for study / projects Poster presentations
Writing newspaper article Students producing mind maps in class
Source: Adapted from O‘Neill & McMahon, 2005
Students should be involved and contribute to class. The teaching material offers
huge scope for discussion and debate among students, so that classes resemble
seminars. Lecturers should augment the material with case studies from their
own countries and with current material, so that students are using journalistic
material from radio, TV, newspapers and magazines they are reading themselves.
Students should be encouraged to source material themselves and bring it to the
classes.
Teachers can produce notes for hypothetical stories, based on real ones, that
raise difficulties or issues and get students to write them up. Students should also
be encouraged to produce databases for child rights sources under headings such
as ‗government sources‘ ‗international sources‘, ‗child rights sources‘, similar to
those listed in the teaching material. The extensive material available through
websites such as that for CRIN and UNICEF can act as a good first resource.
The appropriate methodology to teach children’s rights
12
Lecturers facilitating this course can produce a method of delivery that
incorporates SCL and HRE principles and objectives and one that fits in with their
institutional circumstances and environments. The following method is an
example of one that reinforces the principles of student centered learning and
utilizes the participatory method. It has been successfully employed
internationally in teaching both human rights and children‘s‘ rights education.
ADIDS method
The ADIDS method is advocated by the Asia-Pacific Regional Resource Centre for
Human Rights Education (ARRC HRE), which started as a joint project of Amnesty
International and the Asian Cultural Forum on Development. It is a non-profit,
non-government, regional organization founded in 1992 to serve as an institute
and a network for human rights education in the Asia-Pacific region providing
human rights training workshops, development and exchange of instructional and
other relevant materials, research and HRE campaigns. In 1995 ARRC published
the HRE Pack, a set of human rights education materials, which included their
ADIDS framework, a translation of Paolo Freire‘s concept of education.
ADIDS
ACTIVITY
Each lesson starts with an activity designed either to elicit participants' prior
knowledge or experience relevant to the objectives of the lessons or to help them
easily understand concepts. At this stage it allows the participants to create and
re-create images and feelings associated with their experiences related to the
objectives of the lesson. The activity makes the participants feel that they are at
the centre of the discussion. The starting point is their experience which is the
context of rights.
DISCUSSION
The discussion is the reflective and observation phase of the lesson. The
questions are intended to encourage the participants to reflect on their
experiences identified in the activity. Participants will think about these
experiences by relating them to the objectives of the lesson. More often, we take
our experiences as given, it is when we purposefully examine them that we gain
insights and see them from a different perspective. The participants' experience
becomes the object and "content" of the discussion.
INPUT / LECTURE
13
The input is aimed at expanding the participants' knowledge. The facilitator or the
resource person may present a view that may validate or may challenge the
participants' understanding of the identified experience. The input is designed to
specifically present the "rights" perspective through which the participants'
experiences are viewed. The input could also be viewed as an "organiser" of the
participants' knowledge by putting rights "labels" on their experiences.
DEEPENING
The deepening serves as forum to elicit and address conflict or contradiction
within the participants' views on one hand, and between their views and those of
the resource person's, on the other.
SYNTHESIS
The synthesis is usually designed with specific activities that will help the
participants summarise the insights generated from the discussion from the
activity to deepening segment of the lesson. This will also help the facilitator
determine if the objectives of the lessons are achieved and make the necessary
adjustments for the next lesson.
(ARRC, 1995)
The below table is an example of Unit 1, section 1 of this module taught using the
ADIDS method
ADIDS Methodology Implementation Facilitators Notes
Activity
Or
Discussion
Bring in / make collage of
magazine/newspaper
articles relating to human
rights
The activity or discussion
elicits the participants‘
understanding and prior
knowledge of the key
learning points:
What are human rights?
The Universal Declaration
of Human Rights
Defending human rights
Talk about recent media
coverage of stories
relating to human rights.
Input/Lecture What are the
international human
rights standards?
What is the Universal
Declaration of Human
Rights about?
How did the human rights
standards evolve?
What are the
fundamental principles
underlying the human
rights standards?
What are the specific
rights in the UDHR?
The input builds on what
the participants already
know. The facilitator will
just supplement what is
missed in the
activity/discussion
14
What are violations of
human rights?
What countries have or
have not violated human
rights?
Deepening Are human rights
universal or relative to
one‘s culture or situation?
Is there a particular
national view of human
rights?
What are the implications
of human rights for
journalism?
Deepening initiates
discussion of debatable
issues about human
rights.
These are thought
provoking questions to
make the participants
examine some of their
views which they may
hold critically or
uncritically.
Synthesis An illustration or a
scenario where students
can apply their
knowledge.
Synthesis summarizes
the insights of the
session and helps the
facilitator determine if
the learning objectives
were achieved
15
BLENDED LEARNING
Computer assisted learning (CAL) has already been recommended as a method of
student centered learning in the methodologies section, and computer aided
assessment (CAA) is also mentioned as a possible assessment method.
Blended learning is simply the terminology used to describe learning and teaching
approaches which contain a mixture of online activities and face-to-face activities.
VLEs are virtual learning environments which support blended learning.
Examples of Blended Learning:
o Blending of course components
A course of study is likely to be made up of a mixture of face-to-face sessions
and online activities. The proportion of each varies tremendously from course
to course. In this form of blending, individual activities are either entirely
face-to-face or entirely online. So there may be a lecture, followed by an
online discussion, followed by a practical, followed by use of online materials.
o Blending of physical and virtual (location blending)
An online activity is traditionally thought to be designed for individual use off-
campus, at home. However, online activities are sometimes used within a
class session with the tutor present. Some online activities are carried out by
groups of students in campus study areas (―learning spaces‖). The educational
activity can therefore itself be a mixture of face-to-face communication and
discussion and use of online materials, information and communication. The
learning activity is in itself blended. It can mix location, both physical and
virtual.
o Blending of resources
E-learning offers unique opportunities to bring together resources from
different sources. Access to external resources and to those created locally by
the tutor can be integrated; course tutors can work as teams and share
resources more readily using learning technologies. Students use each other
as resources, asking for help; this is of course done face-to-face but also
online; probably both.
o The range and variety of learning resources available to students carrying
out study tasks is a mixture of digital, physical and human resources,
16
accessed by face-to-face or online methods or a mixture of both.
(UCISA-TLIG, 2004)
VLE (virtual learning environment) refers to the entire collection of e-learning
tools and software available to staff and students.
Examples of VLEs:
Blackboard
WebCT
Questionmark
Content Repositories
Student Centered VLE
Much of the current use of e-learning has been driven and created in a rather
staff-centered way. Indeed the popular packages (Blackboard and WebCT) are
very much staff-centered in the way they operate. Everything is organised by
courses and requires tutor input. There is very little scope for students to work on
their own initiative across course boundaries, and set up discussions or post
materials without having to ask a tutor to set this up for them.
Student needs
If a group of students wish to make use of WebCT or Blackboard, yet their tutor
has not set up a course area for them, is there a way within the university that
(a) their voice can be heard? (b) their needs met? What is the feature they are
really asking for?
If an increasing proportion of learning is online, students might wish to organize
their time better into larger ―chunks‖ of time on and time off campus. Do
university timetabling systems try to deliberately build in fewer days on campus?
There are interesting developments in active learning and group work using e-
learning. What are students‘ views on such teaching methods? And what
educational approaches would they welcome?
What support would a student want in terms of: access from home, academic
versus technical queries, wireless network availability, design of study spaces?
Within the VLE, what if a student wishes to set up an online study group for
conferencing or sharing resources on their own initiative i.e. without asking the
tutor to do it? What if a student finds some interesting online resources and
includes links and/or materials into some kind of course area or web space of
their own? These kind of student-centered tools are not readily available within
conventional course management systems. What might be provided? Again, what
17
would students want?
(UCISA-TLIG, 2004)
Ways that lecturers can employ a blended learning approach to this module:
1.
2.
3.
Benefits of adopting a blended learning approach:
18
ASSESSMENT
Assessment is vitally important in that it indicates to the lecturer that the
students have internalized the concepts involved and are able to work in a
professional way as journalists. It is important that the assessment tests all
aspects of the syllabus and assesses the five (5) identified learning outcomes for
the full module.
Lecturers can choose how to assess, depending on the students, how advanced
they are or based on what they are used to. We would discourage relying simply
on traditional examinations only, as it does not test the full range of what the
syllabus is endeavoring to address. The difficulties arising from traditional
assessment practices are, for example, that the giving of marks and grades are
over emphasized, while the giving of advice and the learning function are under
emphasized and that pupils are compared with one another which highlights
competition rather than personal improvement.
Lecturers should ideally employ both summative and formative assessments to
test the students. Summative assessments should be used to signify competence
and contribute to a student‘s grade in the module. Formative assessment should
be used to provide feedback to the student on their learning. It provides the
student with advice on how to maintain and improve their progress, but should
not form part of their summative grade or mark.
By developing more formative assessment in your courses you can provide a
focus for the student by highlighting their learning gaps and areas that they can
develop. Examples of formative assessment include feedback on essays, written
comments on assignments, grades during the year that do not add to end of year
mark and multiple-choice questions/answers for feedback only. The addition of
more formative assessment encourages a more student–centered approach.
The most important principle of summative assessment is that it should
determine whether, and to what extent, the student has attained the learning
outcomes specified for that module, and should lead to a grade or mark that will
affect the student‘s progression, result, or both. What students learn, how much
effort they put into it, and the nature if their learning is often determined by the
extent and nature of the summative assessment they expect to receive.
However, formative assessment is essential to learning, and ideally curricula
19
should be designed to maximize the amount of formative feedback students can
receive on their work.
Summative Assessment
Below are some examples of summative assessments, which lecturers can either
use or adapt. The following is recommended as an example of summative
assessment for the module as a whole:
Students will submit a proposal for a 1,000 word article concerning some area of
children’s’ rights and welfare. The article will be original work and produced to a
high professional level and publishable. Students will also submit a journal which
will outline the process of research and writing the article. Where it is possible
students can produce a news package for radio.
Students might, for example, make a pitch to a commissioning editor of a media
outlet and produce an article or package for publication or broadcast. The student
should also write a weekly journal outlining the process, detailing issues raised,
including the interest, or lack of interest in the issues surrounding children‘s
rights. This sort of assessment can realistically be included only where there is a
large media market. A variant of this is for students to submit work to an editor,
who will give his or her views on a piece, but might not necessarily publish it. The
student is marked on the issues raised in the journal, the fact of publication and
the issues raised in the published piece.
Formative Assessment
Below are some examples of formative assessments which lecturers can again
use or adapt as they determine appropriate:
Students will be given an assignment after every class, to be submitted before
the next class. This means students will be tested in every aspect of the unit. The
assignments can range from short news items, to undertaking a vox pop with
children on a given topic, to multiple-choice tests. It is important that the
assignments are appropriate to the level of the students but not too difficult or
detailed to be difficult to complete in the time allotted. These class-linked
assignments can be used as formative assessment and do not all need to be
graded. Rather they provide a rich basis for future classes and assist in
identifying key issues for discussion and further elaboration. Any of the following
formative assessment techniques can be employed depending on the assignment:
o Peer assessment
20
o Self assessment
o Computer assisted assessment (CAA)
o Learning contracts / negotiated contracts
Peer/Self Assessment
Peer and self-assessment both give some control and responsibility back to the
student, emphasizing an increased sense of autonomy in the learner. Self-
assessment is an essential activity to help students to take responsibility for their
own learning.
Peer Assessment
Peer assessment is the assessment of the work of others of equal status and
power. Peer assessment should benefit both those giving the feedback as well as
those receiving it. Giving constructive feedback is a valuable skill. To acquire
this skill the student will learn how to study marking/grading schemes or
assessment criteria, construct sentences that impart effective comments, and be
able to defend their feedback. Critical reflection, a key skill involved in giving
feedback, is an academically valuable one. Students also learn diplomacy, how to
receive and act on constructive criticism, as well as the more obvious skills of
making explicit and criterion-referencing judgments. Peer assessment can deepen
the student learning experience as students can learn a great deal about their
own work from assessing other students‘ attempts at a similar task.
(DIT, 2008)
Self-assessment
With self assessment, students check their work, revisit assignment drafts and
texts, and research and reflect upon their past practice. Care is needed to teach
the student to make judgments on what was actually achieved rather than what
was ‗meant‘. But once mastered, in addition to judging one‘s own work, the
concept of self-assessment develops skills in self-awareness and critical
reflection. Many of the benefits of peer assessment apply to self- assessment.
(DIT, 2008)
Computer-Assisted Assessment (CAA)
Computer-Assisted Assessment is a fast and efficient way to provide immediate
feedback to the learner, and to save time on tutor marking. Computer Assisted
Assessment is typically formative, in that it helps students to discover whether
they have learned what the educator intended.
21
(DIT, 2008)
Learning contracts/negotiated contracts
These contracts are goals set by the student, depending on their learning gaps,
which are in turn negotiated with the lecturer. The contract can also highlight the
manner in which the student would like to be assessed in order to demonstrate
that they have reached the goals. This can add choice in what to study and, in
addition, choice in how the student will be assessed. Choice is one of the key
terms in relation to student–centered learning.
The concept of negotiation of learning also addresses the unique change in
relationship between lecturer and student. In practice, how do we give students
some autonomy and decision-making in an area such as assessment? The below
table highlights a range of suggestions on how lecturers can involve students in
the assessment process.
Involving students at the stage when
the task is set
Choosing the assessment task
Setting the assessment task
Discussion on the assessment criteria
Setting the assessment criteria
Involving students at the stage after
the task is completed
Making self assessment comments
Making peer assessment feedback
Suggesting self-assessment
grades/marks
Negotiating self assessment grades /
marks
Assigning self assessment grades or
marks
Assigning peer assessment grades or
marks
Source: Adapted from O‘Neill & McMahon, 2005
Feedback
The most important feature of formative (and indeed of summative) assessment
is the feedback provided either by the students, peers, or the facilitator.
Good quality, comprehensive, timely feedback is a very important factor in
driving student learning. Assessment should provide feedback to students on
their progress towards the achievement of learning outcomes. Feedback will
enable students to realise where they have done well and indicate what they
could improve on, as well as justifying the grade/mark of summative
assessments.
22
To ensure that your feedback as a facilitator is has maximum impact on student
learning, it is important that feedback is timely. If you provide feedback too
soon, it may disrupt the student‘s reflective process. However, it is far more
common that feedback is provided too late when it is no longer salient to the
student. Feedback should not be held off until the end of a year/semester, as the
student is unlikely to benefit from it once the task is complete and they have
moved on to a new one.
The benefits of successful feedback set in the context of learning outcomes are
many. For example, successful feedback will:
o Build confidence in the students,
o Motivate students to improve their learning;
o Provide students with performance improvement information,
o Correct errors, identify strengths and weaknesses
Making feedback more effective
As an educator, there are many ways to improve the quality of your feedback to
make it more effective for the learner. Simple things like not always using ticks
to indicate a good point are recommended as students will be more motivated by
short words or phrases such as ―good work‖ or ―true‖. Feedback should be
specific – don‘t just say ‗good‘, explain why, in what respects. It should also be
constructive, encouraging, honest, and supportive; and where possible it should
be frequent and substantial. Successful feedback should clearly indicate to the
student:
o What aspects of their assessed work are successful, and why
o What aspects of their assessed work are less successful, and why
o How the student could improve this particular piece of work
o How the student could do more successful work in future.
Making feedback more efficient
Feedback can be time-consuming, but there are ways to make it more efficient.
o Consider the nature of the feedback students will need to master the
concepts and skills for each assignment. How detailed does it have to be?
Should it be individual or can it be group feedback? Can it be oral or does
it have to be written?
o Use the track and edit tool in Word to speed up feedback and comments
on student essays and reports.
23
o Consider using or creating generic feedback forms.
o Consider audiotaping feedback for learners.
o Provide more detailed solution sets to reveal the appropriate underlying
reasoning, to identify potentially misunderstood concepts or principles, and
to elaborate how common student errors followed from these
misunderstandings.
(DIT, 2008)
24
ORGANISATION OF THE MODULE
Module Structure
Children's Rights And Journalism Practice - A Rights-Based Perspective is
organised into two Units: Unit 1 ‗Introducing Children‘s Rights‘ and Unit 2
‗Children‘s Rights and Professional Journalism Practice‘. Unit 1 introduces central
guiding principles designed to give students a conceptual appreciation and
understanding. This is then applied to practical examples and professional
contexts in Unit 2. It is intended that students take the complete module though
for organisational purposes, it is possible to deliver each Unit separately.
Aims and Objectives
The aim of the module is to provide the trainee or student journalist with an
understanding of children‘s rights as articulated in the UN Convention of the
Rights of the Child, and to develop responsible news reporting skills that
encompass and respect children's rights in all matters relating to children‘s
participation and representation in the media.
Learning Outcomes
On completion of this module, the student will be able to:
1. Understand and be able to outline the principle features of children‘s
rights as outlined in the UNCRC
2. Read, analyze and critically evaluate the reporting of issues affecting
children from a rights-based perspective
3. Critically assess the relevance and importance of editorial guidelines and
codes of practice in relation to news reporting affecting children
4. Make professional judgments regarding journalism practice from a
perspective of children's rights
5. Report fairly, accurately and in keeping with the principles of children‘s
rights
25
Module Structure – Contact Hours & Student Effort
The module is presented as one 10 ECTS module and is based on a total of 200
hours individual learning effort on the part of the student. Each unit may be
presented separately as two 5 ECTS Units.
Total recommended contact hours for the module: 60
Student Effort Breakdown (Non – contact hours)
It is expected that 140 hours private study will be required.
Learning hours in total: 200.
26
TEACHERS’ NOTES FOR INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS
UNIT 1: INTRODUCING CHILDREN’S RIGHTS
1. Introducing The Concept Of Human Rights
Key learning points for this section are:
What are human rights?
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Defending human rights
Recommended topic for discussion: Discuss the concept of human rights in the
context of a selected, contemporary topic of relevance.
The intention behind this task is to generate discussion between students and the
lecturer on the topic of human rights in general. The topic chosen can be directed
by the lecturer or selected by students themselves. Using the discussion as a
starting point the class can consider some of the points raised in the section such
as the concept and import of the inalienable, inidivisble and interdependent
nature of rights. Specifically, the discussion can interrogate the influence of
human rights and the implications for journalism practice.
2. Children’s Rights
Key learning points for this section are:
Why children‘s rights?
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
Committee on the Rights of the Child
Recommended topic for discussion: Drawing on your country‘s national reports to
the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, and its review of those reports,
discuss the monitoring mechanism for the UNCRC and its impact locally.
Each country, upon ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, is
required to present a National Report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the
Child on a regular basis. This report is often accompanied by a 'Shadow' report
from the non-governmental sector. It is helpful for students to review these
reports and see what key points are raised by governments as important and how
27
this is reflected in the NGO report. In addition the UN Committee on the Rights of
the Child provides concluding comments on the country reports and these
highlight the actions to be taken to improve the situation. Both the national
reports and the concluding comments can provide a useful context within which
to consider what exactly is meant by children's rights. Students might be asked
to consider their own experiences as children and how they believe this might
influence their views on the issue of children's rights.
3. Children’s Rights & The Media
Key learning points for this section are:
The effects of media on young people
Portrayal of children in the media
Participation of children in the media
Recommended topic for discussion: Select a current media item involving children
and reflect on it in the context of children's rights.
This section is designed to help students think through the implications of
children's rights and how they might 'look' in reality. Taking the issues that arise
in discussion it would be helpful to look at the balance of rights between children,
parents and adults in society. The discussion could then be moved on to
considering how children can become more engaged in participating in matters
that affect them. Such matters would include education, day-care, play and
recreation. Research has found that adults often provide tokenistic opportunities
for participation rather than really allowing children to participate in a meaningful
way and taking account of the outcome of that participation. A look at some
examples of good practice will allow students broaden their understanding of a
rights-based approach for children's policy, practices and research.
4. Barriers To Realization Of Children’s Rights
Key learning points for this section are:
Protecting human rights
Upholding children‘s rights
Problems in realizing children‘s rights
28
Recommended topic for discussion and further research: Identify those groups
within your country that advocate on behalf of children. Are they rights-based?
Do they facilitate the voice of the child in their work?
Following on from the discussions and classes to date students should - at this
stage in the programme - have a greater grasp of what a 'rights-based' approach
would or could mean in reality. Looking at the agencies involved in advocacy
[national and international] and the government departments with responsibilities
for children it might be useful to discuss the language of rights and the rhetoric of
rights. Students should now be able to consider the barriers to realising rights, if
any, in their own contexts.
5. Media Representation, Children's Rights And Professional
Responsibility
Key learning points for this section are:
Media representation of children
Media stereotyping
Violation of children‘s rights
Protecting children
Recommended topic for discussion and further research: Review the CRIN ethical
guidelines and identify some key implications for your own practice. How, if at all,
do these guidelines inform current practice?
This module is concerned with children's rights in journalism practice. A constant
challenge is to move student thinking from the idea of the protection of children
towards the idea of children as active, participating citizens and the protection of
their rights. This section is intended to assist students move beyond the
superficial view of children in terms of the standard dichotomies - good/bad;
angels/devils and so forth - to reviewing the minor and more serious forms of
stereotyping, and the risks therein, of undermining children's rights.
6. Good Practice In Presenting Information From Children’s Perspectives
29
Key learning points for this section are:
‗A World Fit for Children‘
National plans of action for children
Children‘s participation
Principles of best practice
Getting children‘s perspectives: examples
Recommended topic for discussion and further research: Review the status of
your National Plan of Action for Children and discuss the participation of children
and young people in its development.
Some countries are more proactive than others in working towards the realisation
of children's rights and including children as participants in the process. The task
is designed to encourage students to think about this in relation to their
immediate environment. Overall, this section of the module lends itself to
engaging the student directly in considering how they might work with and on
behalf of children within an international framework and from a rights-based
perspective.
The intention behind this unit of the overall module is to generate critical
discussion among the students of what it means to be right-based and how this
would impact on journalistic practice, particularly in relation to children and
children's issues. It is to be anticipated that there will be disagreement and
debate - all of which will enrich the learning for the students and encourage a
reflective approach to this complex area.
30
UNIT 2: CHILDREN’S RIGHTS AND PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISM
PRACTICE
1. Codes Of Conduct And Editorial Guidelines
The key Learning Points in this section are:
Why codes of conduct?
Should codes be detailed and prescriptive or contain broad principles?
Codes of conduct and duty
Codes of conduct and press freedom
Responsibility v freedom
Note for Teachers: Ask class to discuss what they believe should be in a good
code of conduct and what values should be highlighted in a code. Make list on a
board and then compare the list created following class discussion with real
codes.
It is always important to allow students time to question the material offered. Is it
always necessary to obey codes? Are codes guidelines or regulations?
2. CHILD PROTECTION POLICIES
Key learning points in this section include:
Child-protection polices. What are they and what have they to do with
journalists?
Policing child-protection policies
Adhering to child-protection policies
Child-protection policies and press freedom
This unit covers a journalist‘s own behaviour in terms of adhering to child
protection policies in their own workplace and looking to organisations which are
not ensuring child protection. It builds on the previous lecture on codes of ethics.
An important news story of recent years was the coverage of child abuse by
priests of the Catholic Church in the US, Australia and Ireland. Students could see
31
what policies are in place to protect children in any organisations in their own
areas. They might also see what changes the Catholic Church has implemented
and what policies relating to child protection it has put in place since the child
abuse stories.
Students might interview local journalists to see how aware they are of policies or
regulations to protect children.
Students should talk to local NGOs involved in child rights about media coverage.
Such talks can be made into a report to be shared with the rest of the class.
3. CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW
Key learning points for this section are:
Child-protection polices. What are they and what have they to do with
journalists?
Policing child-protection policies
Adhering to child-protection policies
Child-protection policies and press freedom
This can be a very difficult area for journalists. Often there is a public demand for
some children to be treated harshly if they are involved in serious crimes. At
times children, because of the nature of the crime, are identified even in countries
that usually respect the anonymity of children who are before the courts.
It is vitally important to ensure all students are familiar with the legal position
regarding children before courts or dealing with the judicial system and police in
their own country.
Any journalist interesting in specialising in the area of children and their rights
should ensure they are familiar with the whole range of law as it relates to
children.
32
4. GETTING STORIES & SOURCES
Key learning points for this section are:
What are sources?
Can children be sources?
The importance of sources to journalists
Anonymous sources
Where do stories come from?
Get students to choose a story and list the sources they would use, including how
they would contact people, give phone numbers, or email addresses. Students
should also say why they have selected the particular story. One of the issues
concerning sources is that journalists rely on too small a group of people who
tend to be establishment, encourage them to think differently and
unconventionally when selecting sources.
This module should incorporate what students have studied in other modules
about news values.
Students should practice writing stories and work out how to incorporate a child
rights agenda.
Incorporating a child rights agenda does not always mean the UN Convention of
the Rights of the Child. The Convention no doubt gives journalists an agenda
within which to seek stories. It also allows journalists to be ‗watch-dogs‘ in
relation to the Convention, by investigating the government‘s actions in relation
to its responsibilities under the convention, for instance.
Lecturers might give students the outline of hypothetical stories, in note form,
and see how students write up stories, ensuring reader interest.
The teaching material lists sources of information and organisations. Students
should see if such a list can be drawn up for their own country.
It might be useful for the class to produce a database of organisations and
individuals who would be good sources in each country. Such a list can be given
to each student and so improve their professionalism as working journalists.
33
5. INTERVIEWING CHILDREN
Key learning points for this section are:
How should children be interviewed?
Should children be interviewed only with a responsible adult present?
When can a child be interviewed without a parent or guardian present?
Does interviewing children require different skills from those used in
interviewing adults?
Ask a local journalist and a person from a child rights NGO to take part in a class.
Get both to address the issues of children as sources, interviewing children and
consent. In this class it might be worth exploring the public interest role of the
journalist and compare it to the role of the NGO which will probably articulate
only the interest of the child.
The class should discuss how children might have stories themselves and how to
sources them.
Get the class to discuss the guidelines for interviewing children and discuss if they
would help or hinder journalists. Are there times when journalists might be forced
to work outside the guidelines?
This is an opportunity to reinforce important issues such as on and off the
record, using anonymous sources and accessing stories, which should have
been covered in previous modules,
6. CHILDREN IN ARMED CONFLICT
Key learning points for this section are:
Child soldiers as a story
Context, war, civil disruption, collapse of civil society
Sensationalism of the issue of child soldiers
34
Transferring skills to other stories
This is a major and ongoing story that highlights many of the problems journalists
face when covering major stories that have children at the centre. It might be
useful to broaden discussion and take in other stories, especially stories, such as
children as sex workers, trafficking in children or any other that might have a
local interest. Again, it might be useful to get students to list sources that might
be used if looking at any of these stories.
Two issues raised: How to keep an ongoing story in the public eye; How to cover
this story without sensationalism and keeping the welfare of children at its centre.
7. GIVING CHILDREN A VOICE AND CHILD-CENTRED MEDIA
Key learning points for this section are:
Giving children access to the media
How to ensure a child‘s right to a voice in the media
Children‘s media
Get students to find an example somewhere that tries to address children and
write about it. If students have access to the WWW they might be able to find a
radio station somewhere in the world.
Interview children about a big story in the news to see if they have a different
perspective and what that is.
8. BEST PRACTICE IN JOURNALISM CONCERNING CHILDREN
The key learning points for this final section are:
35
Good practice in news reporting concerning children
Monitoring and evaluation children‘s media: press, radio, television
36
Bibliography
ARRC (1995) The Human Rights Pack. ARRC.
DIT (2008) Enhancing Student Learning through Assessment. Dublin Institute of
Technology (DIT).
O‘Neill, G. and McMahon, T. (2005) Student-centred Learning: What does it mean
for Students and Lecturers?, in G. O‘Neill, S. Moore and B. McMullin (eds.)
Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching, Dubin: All
Ireland Society for Higher Education (AISHE)
UCISA-TLIG (2004) VLEs and Blended Learning, A discussion paper based on
TLIG meetings held during 2004, UCISA.
UNESCO (2005) Revised draft plan of action for the first phase (2005-2007) of
the World Programme for Human Rights Education. UNESCO, 2005
Yeban, Felice (2002) Building a Culture of Human Rights: Challenge to Human
Rights Education in 21st Century, ARRC.
Yeban, Felice (1999) The Children‘s Rights Training Package, UNICEF HANOI.