children's services management report · 2019-06-25 · mission statement: “we will lead the...

106
Department of Social Services Children's Division Children's Services Management Report May 2019 Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis 221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101

Upload: others

Post on 14-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Department of Social Services Children's Division

Children's Services Management Report

May 2019

Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis

221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101

Page 2: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report

I Research and Data Analysis

State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement:

“We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure and sustain healthy, safe, and productive lives." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.

Page 3: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report II Research and Data Analysis

Table of Contents

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only.

Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month

to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values.

Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ...............................................................V

Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N)

Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those

Reported for the Same Month Last Year ....................................................................... 2

Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During the Month ....................................................................................... 4

Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During the Month .................................................................. 6

Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .................................. 8

Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................ 10

Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month .......................................... 12

Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ............................................ 14

Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years.............................................................. 14

Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart ................................. 15

Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 15

Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 16

Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments

Completed in the Month ............................................................................................ 16

Figure 8a. CA/N Investigations Completed During the Month ....................................................... 17

Figure 8b. CA/N Assessments Completed During the Month ......................................................... 17

Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................... 18

Family-Centered Services (FCS)

Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ................................. 22

Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24

Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month ............................................... 26

Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 28

Page 4: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report III Research and Data Analysis

Table 11. FCS Cases By Region Closed During the Month by Close Reason .................................. 30

Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ...................... 32

Table 13. FCS Cases By Region Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement . 34

Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years .................. 36

Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases by Region Active as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart ................................................................................................ 36

Figure 11. FCS Cases by Region Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................... 37

Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 37

Figure 13. FCS Cases by Region Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing .......................... 38

Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement

By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 38

Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 39

Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures .............................................................. 40

Out-of-Home Placement

Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................... 44

Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ............................................... 46

Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years ............... 48

Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Length of Stay and Region ........................................................................................ 49

Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month

By Length of Stay and Case Manager County .............................................................. 50

Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case

Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................... 52

Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Type......................................................................... 54

Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Placement Category and Case Manager County........................................................... 64

Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month

Grouped by Reason for Case Closing .......................................................................... 66

Page 5: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report IV Research and Data Analysis

Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody ................................................................................ 68

Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type ........................... 70

Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ................................................................. 72

Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped

By Case Manager County and Goal ............................................................................. 74

Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped

By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements..................................... 76

Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 78

Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ............................ 80

Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During

the Last Two Years ................................................................................................... 80

Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region ...................................................................................... 81

Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ........................................................... 81

Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ........................................................................................... 82

Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ........................................................................ 82

Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and

Subsequent Disposition ............................................................................................. 83

Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................... 84

Intensive In-Home Services (IIS)

Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ........................ 90

Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County ................................................................................................ 92

Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................... 94

Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ...................................................... 96

Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ................................................ 98

Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ......................................................................... 100

Page 6: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report V Research and Data Analysis

Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions

Page 7: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Child Abuse and Neglect

Page 8: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 1.

Incidents and Children Reported During May 2019

Compared to Those Reported During May 2018

Current Incidents Current Children

Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage

Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change

Northwest Andrew 16 9 77.78% 25 12 108.33%

Atchison 3 1 200.00% 6 1 500.00%

Buchanan 131 135 -2.96% 180 209 -13.88%

Caldwell 9 6 50.00% 18 11 63.64%

Carroll 6 4 50.00% 7 5 40.00%

Cass 89 90 -1.11% 117 126 -7.14%

Chariton 8 5 60.00% 10 8 25.00%

Clay 188 156 20.51% 234 202 15.84%

Clinton 23 28 -17.86% 31 34 -8.82%

Cooper 7 6 16.67% 7 6 16.67%

Daviess 9 10 -10.00% 15 11 36.36%

De Kalb 8 4 100.00% 9 5 80.00%

Gentry 5 1 400.00% 8 1 700.00%

Grundy 22 8 175.00% 33 14 135.71%

Harrison 5 7 -28.57% 11 11 0.00%

Holt 5 3 66.67% 5 5 0.00%

Johnson 39 26 50.00% 54 39 38.46%

Lafayette 29 33 -12.12% 48 48 0.00%

Linn 17 8 112.50% 29 15 93.33%

Livingston 9 14 -35.71% 10 24 -58.33%

Mercer 4 0 0.00% 5 0 0.00%

Nodaway 12 12 0.00% 14 18 -22.22%

Pettis 47 50 -6.00% 63 71 -11.27%

Platte 78 54 44.44% 96 76 26.32%

Putnam 8 3 166.67% 14 8 75.00%

Ray 28 20 40.00% 42 28 50.00%

Saline 27 18 50.00% 44 22 100.00%

Sullivan 5 6 -16.67% 9 9 0.00%

Worth 0 3 -100.00% 0 3 -100.00%

* Region Total * 837 720 16.25% 1,144 1,022 11.94%

Northeast Adair 20 22 -9.09% 34 26 30.77%

Audrain 24 36 -33.33% 36 44 -18.18%

Boone 128 123 4.07% 170 176 -3.41%

Callaway 47 47 0.00% 67 64 4.69%

Clark 5 8 -37.50% 5 9 -44.44%

Cole 61 62 -1.61% 86 95 -9.47%

Franklin 90 101 -10.89% 110 145 -24.14%

Gasconade 17 10 70.00% 26 16 62.50%

Howard 12 5 140.00% 16 8 100.00%

Jefferson 149 155 -3.87% 200 213 -6.10%

Knox 4 2 100.00% 5 5 0.00%

Lewis 10 7 42.86% 14 8 75.00%

Lincoln 55 58 -5.17% 69 69 0.00%

Macon 14 15 -6.67% 19 21 -9.52%

Marion 39 39 0.00% 53 59 -10.17%

Monroe 7 5 40.00% 17 6 183.33%

Montgomery 18 20 -10.00% 32 25 28.00%

Osage 2 5 -60.00% 2 7 -71.43%

Pike 21 11 90.91% 35 13 169.23%

Ralls 6 5 20.00% 6 9 -33.33%

Randolph 29 35 -17.14% 33 49 -32.65%

Schuyler 3 4 -25.00% 3 7 -57.14%

Scotland 4 5 -20.00% 7 7 0.00%

Shelby 7 3 133.33% 14 7 100.00%

St Charles 194 206 -5.83% 254 276 -7.97%

Warren 41 39 5.13% 51 46 10.87%

* Region Total * 1,007 1,028 -2.04% 1,364 1,410 -3.26%

Southeast Bollinger 13 7 85.71% 19 9 111.11%

Butler 48 59 -18.64% 57 90 -36.67%

Cape Girardeau 61 50 22.00% 83 75 10.67%

Carter 6 4 50.00% 12 7 71.43%

Crawford 34 34 0.00% 49 50 -2.00%

Dent 11 19 -42.11% 14 30 -53.33%

2Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 9: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 1.

Incidents and Children Reported During May 2019

Compared to Those Reported During May 2018

Current Incidents Current Children

Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage

Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change

Southeast Dunklin 29 32 -9.38% 45 42 7.14%

Howell 57 47 21.28% 76 79 -3.80%

Iron 5 8 -37.50% 7 12 -41.67%

Madison 10 8 25.00% 11 16 -31.25%

Maries 4 4 0.00% 6 4 50.00%

Mississippi 15 14 7.14% 21 25 -16.00%

New Madrid 15 24 -37.50% 20 29 -31.03%

Oregon 13 8 62.50% 22 9 144.44%

Pemiscot 15 27 -44.44% 24 43 -44.19%

Perry 15 12 25.00% 26 16 62.50%

Phelps 34 31 9.68% 44 42 4.76%

Pulaski 46 57 -19.30% 63 78 -19.23%

Reynolds 6 5 20.00% 9 7 28.57%

Ripley 11 17 -35.29% 18 19 -5.26%

Scott 51 42 21.43% 77 63 22.22%

Shannon 3 6 -50.00% 6 8 -25.00%

St Francois 70 74 -5.41% 111 102 8.82%

Ste Genevieve 10 19 -47.37% 13 26 -50.00%

Stoddard 37 28 32.14% 51 50 2.00%

Texas 21 14 50.00% 30 24 25.00%

Washington 35 37 -5.41% 55 54 1.85%

Wayne 12 15 -20.00% 13 19 -31.58%

* Region Total * 687 702 -2.14% 982 1,028 -4.47%

Southwest Barry 20 35 -42.86% 38 47 -19.15%

Barton 16 12 33.33% 21 17 23.53%

Bates 8 7 14.29% 10 10 0.00%

Benton 17 11 54.55% 29 14 107.14%

Camden 35 49 -28.57% 60 64 -6.25%

Cedar 14 15 -6.67% 25 19 31.58%

Christian 65 72 -9.72% 80 110 -27.27%

Dade 2 8 -75.00% 2 10 -80.00%

Dallas 13 15 -13.33% 25 20 25.00%

Douglas 12 12 0.00% 15 41 -63.41%

Greene 379 395 -4.05% 556 548 1.46%

Henry 27 25 8.00% 36 42 -14.29%

Hickory 12 10 20.00% 17 10 70.00%

Jasper 145 147 -1.36% 201 205 -1.95%

Laclede 47 60 -21.67% 67 93 -27.96%

Lawrence 43 54 -20.37% 63 86 -26.74%

McDonald 21 24 -12.50% 31 33 -6.06%

Miller 16 23 -30.43% 35 25 40.00%

Moniteau 12 12 0.00% 16 15 6.67%

Morgan 26 22 18.18% 48 33 45.45%

Newton 36 50 -28.00% 44 86 -48.84%

Ozark 8 7 14.29% 16 10 60.00%

Polk 49 53 -7.55% 62 74 -16.22%

St Clair 7 10 -30.00% 12 13 -7.69%

Stone 28 32 -12.50% 38 37 2.70%

Taney 69 59 16.95% 93 83 12.05%

Vernon 22 33 -33.33% 30 46 -34.78%

Webster 37 40 -7.50% 60 56 7.14%

Wright 22 24 -8.33% 36 38 -5.26%

* Region Total * 1,208 1,316 -8.21% 1,766 1,885 -6.31%

Kansas City Jackson 798 730 9.32% 1,062 1,003 5.88%

* Region Total * 798 730 9.32% 1,062 1,003 5.88%

St. Louis St Louis City 322 297 8.42% 478 411 16.30%

St Louis County 601 545 10.28% 821 703 16.79%

* Region Total * 923 842 9.62% 1,299 1,114 16.61%

Other Out Home Inv 174 212 -17.92% 210 293 -28.33%

Out Of State 14 6 133.33% 20 6 233.33%

* Region Total * 188 218 -13.76% 230 299 -23.08%

State Total 5,648 5,556 1.66% 7,847 7,761 1.11%

3Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 10: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 2.

Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During May 2019

Substan- Total

tiated Children

Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per

tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand

Northwest Andrew 0 0 3 12 0 15 0.00 3.60

Atchison 0 0 4 3 0 7 0.00 5.92

Buchanan 7 0 31 101 3 142 0.33 6.77

Caldwell 1 1 2 4 0 8 0.42 3.33

Carroll 0 0 3 3 0 6 0.00 2.74

Cass 2 0 21 47 0 70 0.08 2.65

Chariton 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.00 2.83

Clay 5 18 28 205 3 259 0.09 4.52

Clinton 0 0 2 5 0 7 0.00 1.37

Cooper 1 0 1 5 0 7 0.25 1.76

Daviess 0 0 2 2 0 4 0.00 1.78

De Kalb 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.43

Gentry 0 0 3 4 0 7 0.00 4.23

Grundy 3 3 0 14 0 20 1.22 8.11

Harrison 3 0 5 11 0 19 1.35 8.55

Holt 0 0 0 7 0 7 0.00 7.21

Johnson 2 0 11 18 0 31 0.17 2.57

Lafayette 2 0 6 16 0 24 0.24 2.93

Linn 1 2 1 11 0 15 0.32 4.75

Livingston 0 0 3 4 0 7 0.00 2.10

Mercer 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 3.12

Nodaway 3 0 0 8 0 11 0.70 2.58

Pettis 4 0 12 44 0 60 0.37 5.56

Platte 1 0 14 48 3 66 0.05 3.00

Putnam 0 0 1 7 0 8 0.00 6.90

Ray 1 0 15 43 1 60 0.17 10.23

Saline 3 0 6 14 0 23 0.56 4.26

Sullivan 0 4 0 7 0 11 0.00 6.77

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 39 28 174 652 10 903 0.18 4.17

Northeast Adair 1 10 3 8 1 23 0.20 4.63

Audrain 3 4 11 37 0 55 0.47 8.64

Boone 7 1 18 41 3 70 0.20 2.04

Callaway 7 1 8 24 2 42 0.70 4.20

Clark 5 2 0 0 0 7 2.91 4.08

Cole 4 8 6 29 0 47 0.22 2.62

Franklin 4 2 18 99 1 124 0.16 4.94

Gasconade 0 0 6 3 0 9 0.00 2.68

Howard 2 8 1 9 2 22 0.92 10.10

Jefferson 21 14 22 140 2 199 0.38 3.62

Knox 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.97

Lewis 2 2 1 9 0 14 0.84 5.85

Lincoln 11 6 8 42 1 68 0.75 4.62

Macon 6 1 2 10 0 19 1.59 5.03

Marion 8 5 4 35 2 54 1.16 7.84

Monroe 0 2 0 11 0 13 0.00 6.31

Montgomery 2 0 2 7 0 11 0.70 3.86

Osage 0 0 2 10 0 12 0.00 3.50

Pike 2 0 1 24 1 28 0.49 6.82

Ralls 7 1 1 17 0 26 2.94 10.93

Randolph 11 2 7 30 0 50 1.87 8.50

Schuyler 2 1 2 3 0 8 1.75 7.02

Scotland 0 2 0 4 0 6 0.00 4.41

Shelby 2 0 8 2 0 12 1.25 7.51

St Charles 0 0 15 93 2 110 0.00 1.18

Warren 0 1 11 35 0 47 0.00 5.78

* Region Total * 107 73 157 723 17 1,077 0.34 3.41

Southeast Bollinger 3 0 3 5 1 12 1.03 4.11

Butler 16 2 31 67 3 119 1.60 11.93

Cape Girardeau 8 2 15 50 5 80 0.48 4.82

Carter 1 0 0 8 0 9 0.66 5.94

Crawford 2 0 6 27 2 37 0.33 6.17

Dent 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 0.55

4Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 11: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 2.

Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During May 2019

Substan- Total

tiated Children

Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per

tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand

Southeast Dunklin 0 0 3 10 1 14 0.00 1.73

Howell 8 8 17 64 0 97 0.79 9.64

Iron 2 0 10 6 0 18 0.83 7.49

Madison 0 1 6 9 0 16 0.00 5.46

Maries 1 4 2 7 0 14 0.46 6.50

Mississippi 0 0 1 24 0 25 0.00 7.84

New Madrid 1 5 14 23 2 45 0.22 9.97

Oregon 5 0 5 5 0 15 2.06 6.18

Pemiscot 6 0 1 38 1 46 1.19 9.14

Perry 4 0 2 13 0 19 0.84 3.99

Phelps 7 1 10 50 6 74 0.71 7.56

Pulaski 3 2 5 40 0 50 0.24 3.99

Reynolds 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00 1.31

Ripley 0 0 2 32 0 34 0.00 10.28

Scott 9 4 9 47 0 69 0.91 7.01

Shannon 0 0 1 4 0 5 0.00 2.54

St Francois 9 8 22 78 7 124 0.62 8.61

Ste Genevieve 2 3 0 20 0 25 0.47 5.92

Stoddard 0 3 2 16 2 23 0.00 3.37

Texas 7 0 2 7 0 16 1.22 2.80

Washington 1 6 10 20 1 38 0.16 6.27

Wayne 2 0 6 15 0 23 0.71 8.20

* Region Total * 97 49 186 688 31 1,051 0.59 6.36

Southwest Barry 1 2 7 29 1 40 0.12 4.63

Barton 0 0 3 16 3 22 0.00 6.85

Bates 0 2 5 10 1 18 0.00 4.23

Benton 0 4 1 15 2 22 0.00 6.40

Camden 3 2 17 34 0 56 0.36 6.67

Cedar 1 0 6 23 0 30 0.30 9.07

Christian 2 2 30 72 2 108 0.09 5.10

Dade 0 0 0 7 0 7 0.00 3.92

Dallas 1 0 3 15 0 19 0.24 4.56

Douglas 0 0 11 11 0 22 0.00 7.19

Greene 17 24 132 365 7 545 0.29 9.34

Henry 0 0 12 17 0 29 0.00 5.85

Hickory 1 0 4 7 1 13 0.60 7.81

Jasper 8 12 44 90 7 161 0.26 5.32

Laclede 4 3 24 35 0 66 0.45 7.41

Lawrence 7 0 18 44 1 70 0.69 6.88

McDonald 1 2 4 22 5 34 0.15 5.25

Miller 0 2 4 9 0 15 0.00 2.44

Moniteau 0 1 0 13 0 14 0.00 3.57

Morgan 7 1 2 16 0 26 1.54 5.73

Newton 0 0 16 66 0 82 0.00 5.55

Ozark 0 0 4 4 0 8 0.00 4.10

Polk 2 2 14 50 1 69 0.26 9.00

St Clair 0 0 1 17 0 18 0.00 9.18

Stone 5 1 11 37 4 58 0.83 9.62

Taney 5 4 10 44 2 65 0.44 5.69

Vernon 5 0 13 25 5 48 0.95 9.12

Webster 7 0 10 27 1 45 0.70 4.48

Wright 6 1 9 34 1 51 1.23 10.47

* Region Total * 83 65 415 1,154 44 1,761 0.32 6.75

Kansas City Jackson 31 3 157 610 41 842 0.19 5.08

* Region Total * 31 3 157 610 41 842 0.19 5.08

St. Louis St Louis City 8 8 87 223 13 339 0.12 5.02

St Louis County 14 5 97 299 33 448 0.06 1.91

* Region Total * 22 13 184 522 46 787 0.07 2.61

Other Out Home Inv 11 0 133 52 14 210 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 11 0 133 52 14 210 0.00 0.00

State Total 390 231 1,406 4,401 203 6,631 0.27 4.65

5Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 12: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 3.

Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During May 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 9 90.00% 0 0.00% 10

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Buchanan 5 4.67% 0 0.00% 20 18.69% 80 74.77% 2 1.87% 107

Caldwell 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6

Cass 2 3.77% 0 0.00% 17 32.08% 34 64.15% 0 0.00% 53

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Clay 5 2.48% 14 6.93% 23 11.39% 157 77.72% 3 1.49% 202

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cooper 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4

Grundy 2 16.67% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 8 66.67% 0 0.00% 12

Harrison 3 21.43% 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 9 64.29% 0 0.00% 14

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Johnson 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 7 33.33% 13 61.91% 0 0.00% 21

Lafayette 2 10.00% 0 0.00% 6 30.00% 12 60.00% 0 0.00% 20

Linn 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 9

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Nodaway 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 85.71% 0 0.00% 7

Pettis 3 7.50% 0 0.00% 8 20.00% 29 72.50% 0 0.00% 40

Platte 1 1.85% 0 0.00% 13 24.07% 38 70.37% 2 3.70% 54

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 6 85.71% 0 0.00% 7

Ray 1 2.63% 0 0.00% 9 23.68% 27 71.05% 1 2.63% 38

Saline 2 11.77% 0 0.00% 4 23.53% 11 64.71% 0 0.00% 17

Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 5

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 30 4.50% 20 3.00% 128 19.19% 481 72.11% 8 1.20% 667

Northeast Adair 1 5.88% 6 35.29% 2 11.77% 7 41.18% 1 5.88% 17

Audrain 2 5.88% 1 2.94% 8 23.53% 23 67.65% 0 0.00% 34

Boone 5 10.20% 1 2.04% 11 22.45% 30 61.22% 2 4.08% 49

Callaway 4 14.29% 1 3.57% 6 21.43% 16 57.14% 1 3.57% 28

Clark 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cole 2 6.90% 2 6.90% 6 20.69% 19 65.52% 0 0.00% 29

Franklin 4 4.49% 2 2.25% 14 15.73% 68 76.40% 1 1.12% 89

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8

Howard 2 14.29% 5 35.71% 1 7.14% 5 35.71% 1 7.14% 14

Jefferson 16 10.67% 9 6.00% 18 12.00% 105 70.00% 2 1.33% 150

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 8 72.73% 0 0.00% 11

Lincoln 8 15.39% 2 3.85% 7 13.46% 34 65.39% 1 1.92% 52

Macon 4 28.57% 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 8 57.14% 0 0.00% 14

Marion 5 12.50% 5 12.50% 3 7.50% 25 62.50% 2 5.00% 40

Monroe 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 8 80.00% 0 0.00% 10

Montgomery 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 9

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 9 81.82% 0 0.00% 11

Pike 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 1 4.76% 18 85.71% 1 4.76% 21

Ralls 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11

Randolph 5 13.89% 2 5.56% 6 16.67% 23 63.89% 0 0.00% 36

Schuyler 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6

Scotland 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6

Shelby 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13 14.13% 77 83.70% 2 2.17% 92

Warren 0 0.00% 1 2.70% 11 29.73% 25 67.57% 0 0.00% 37

* Region Total * 70 8.91% 45 5.73% 123 15.65% 534 67.94% 14 1.78% 786

Southeast Bollinger 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 4 40.00% 1 10.00% 10

Butler 9 12.33% 2 2.74% 16 21.92% 43 58.90% 3 4.11% 73

Cape Girardeau 3 4.84% 2 3.23% 12 19.36% 42 67.74% 3 4.84% 62

Carter 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 6

Crawford 1 3.57% 0 0.00% 5 17.86% 20 71.43% 2 7.14% 28

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment

6Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 13: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 3.

Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During May 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 6 60.00% 1 10.00% 10

Howell 7 10.94% 3 4.69% 12 18.75% 42 65.63% 0 0.00% 64

Iron 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 5 55.56% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9

Madison 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 5 38.46% 7 53.85% 0 0.00% 13

Maries 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 2 22.22% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 6.67% 14 93.33% 0 0.00% 15

New Madrid 1 2.94% 3 8.82% 11 32.35% 17 50.00% 2 5.88% 34

Oregon 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 5 50.00% 4 40.00% 0 0.00% 10

Pemiscot 6 17.14% 0 0.00% 1 2.86% 27 77.14% 1 2.86% 35

Perry 3 18.75% 0 0.00% 2 12.50% 11 68.75% 0 0.00% 16

Phelps 5 10.42% 1 2.08% 6 12.50% 33 68.75% 3 6.25% 48

Pulaski 3 8.57% 1 2.86% 5 14.29% 26 74.29% 0 0.00% 35

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 8.33% 22 91.67% 0 0.00% 24

Scott 6 12.25% 4 8.16% 9 18.37% 30 61.22% 0 0.00% 49

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4

St Francois 5 5.75% 4 4.60% 19 21.84% 56 64.37% 3 3.45% 87

Ste Genevieve 2 13.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 12 80.00% 0 0.00% 15

Stoddard 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 9 69.23% 1 7.69% 13

Texas 5 38.46% 0 0.00% 2 15.39% 6 46.15% 0 0.00% 13

Washington 1 3.57% 4 14.29% 7 25.00% 15 53.57% 1 3.57% 28

Wayne 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 3 20.00% 11 73.33% 0 0.00% 15

* Region Total * 65 8.92% 28 3.84% 139 19.07% 476 65.30% 21 2.88% 729

Southwest Barry 1 2.63% 2 5.26% 7 18.42% 27 71.05% 1 2.63% 38

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 11 73.33% 2 13.33% 15

Bates 0 0.00% 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 9 56.25% 1 6.25% 16

Benton 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 9 64.29% 2 14.29% 14

Camden 2 5.88% 2 5.88% 10 29.41% 20 58.82% 0 0.00% 34

Cedar 1 4.17% 0 0.00% 6 25.00% 17 70.83% 0 0.00% 24

Christian 2 2.20% 2 2.20% 26 28.57% 59 64.84% 2 2.20% 91

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Dallas 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 3 17.65% 13 76.47% 0 0.00% 17

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 43.75% 9 56.25% 0 0.00% 16

Greene 15 3.50% 13 3.03% 106 24.71% 289 67.37% 6 1.40% 429

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 40.91% 13 59.09% 0 0.00% 22

Hickory 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 5 50.00% 1 10.00% 10

Jasper 6 4.88% 6 4.88% 32 26.02% 75 60.98% 4 3.25% 123

Laclede 4 8.16% 1 2.04% 17 34.69% 27 55.10% 0 0.00% 49

Lawrence 3 6.98% 0 0.00% 9 20.93% 30 69.77% 1 2.33% 43

McDonald 1 4.35% 2 8.70% 3 13.04% 13 56.52% 4 17.39% 23

Miller 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 3 21.43% 9 64.29% 0 0.00% 14

Moniteau 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 9 90.00% 0 0.00% 10

Morgan 4 26.67% 1 6.67% 2 13.33% 8 53.33% 0 0.00% 15

Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13 22.41% 45 77.59% 0 0.00% 58

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8

Polk 2 3.85% 1 1.92% 13 25.00% 35 67.31% 1 1.92% 52

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 8 88.89% 0 0.00% 9

Stone 4 9.52% 1 2.38% 7 16.67% 26 61.91% 4 9.52% 42

Taney 5 10.42% 2 4.17% 6 12.50% 33 68.75% 2 4.17% 48

Vernon 4 11.43% 0 0.00% 8 22.86% 20 57.14% 3 8.57% 35

Webster 3 8.82% 0 0.00% 7 20.59% 23 67.65% 1 2.94% 34

Wright 4 13.33% 1 3.33% 6 20.00% 18 60.00% 1 3.33% 30

* Region Total * 63 4.76% 40 3.02% 316 23.87% 869 65.63% 36 2.72% 1,324

Kansas City Jackson 25 4.09% 3 0.49% 120 19.61% 435 71.08% 29 4.74% 612

* Region Total * 25 4.09% 3 0.49% 120 19.61% 435 71.08% 29 4.74% 612

St. Louis St Louis City 7 2.86% 5 2.04% 66 26.94% 155 63.27% 12 4.90% 245

St Louis County 13 3.82% 4 1.18% 81 23.82% 218 64.12% 24 7.06% 340

* Region Total * 20 3.42% 9 1.54% 147 25.13% 373 63.76% 36 6.15% 585

Other Out Home Inv 8 4.68% 0 0.00% 114 66.67% 36 21.05% 13 7.60% 171

* Region Total * 8 4.68% 0 0.00% 114 66.67% 36 21.05% 13 7.60% 171

State Total 281 5.77% 145 2.98% 1,087 22.30% 3,204 65.74% 157 3.22% 4,874

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment Other

7Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 14: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 4.

Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During May 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Atchison 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Buchanan 84 88.42% 10 10.53% 1 1.05% 95

Caldwell 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Carroll 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Cass 41 83.67% 8 16.33% 0 0.00% 49

Chariton 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Clay 167 95.98% 7 4.02% 0 0.00% 174

Clinton 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cooper 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Daviess 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Gentry 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Grundy 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

Harrison 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Holt 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Johnson 15 78.95% 4 21.05% 0 0.00% 19

Lafayette 18 90.00% 2 10.00% 0 0.00% 20

Linn 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Livingston 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Nodaway 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Pettis 38 95.00% 2 5.00% 0 0.00% 40

Platte 35 77.78% 10 22.22% 0 0.00% 45

Putnam 5 71.43% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 7

Ray 33 91.67% 3 8.33% 0 0.00% 36

Saline 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16

Sullivan 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 546 90.10% 57 9.41% 3 0.50% 606

Northeast Adair 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16

Audrain 30 96.77% 1 3.23% 0 0.00% 31

Boone 33 75.00% 9 20.46% 2 4.55% 44

Callaway 22 95.65% 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 23

Clark 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cole 25 96.15% 1 3.85% 0 0.00% 26

Franklin 71 82.56% 15 17.44% 0 0.00% 86

Gasconade 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Howard 12 92.31% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 13

Jefferson 108 79.41% 25 18.38% 3 2.21% 136

Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Lincoln 47 97.92% 0 0.00% 1 2.08% 48

Macon 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

Marion 34 91.89% 3 8.11% 0 0.00% 37

Monroe 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

Montgomery 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8

Osage 7 63.64% 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 11

Pike 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16

Ralls 8 72.73% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 11

Randolph 28 77.78% 7 19.44% 1 2.78% 36

Schuyler 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Scotland 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Shelby 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

St Charles 65 78.31% 16 19.28% 2 2.41% 83

Warren 29 90.63% 3 9.38% 0 0.00% 32

* Region Total * 616 85.68% 93 12.94% 10 1.39% 719

Southeast Bollinger 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Butler 62 88.57% 8 11.43% 0 0.00% 70

Cape Girardeau 54 94.74% 0 0.00% 3 5.26% 57

Carter 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Crawford 21 84.00% 4 16.00% 0 0.00% 25

Dent 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact

8Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 15: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 4.

Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During May 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Howell 58 92.06% 5 7.94% 0 0.00% 63

Iron 7 77.78% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 9

Madison 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Maries 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9

Mississippi 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

New Madrid 30 96.77% 1 3.23% 0 0.00% 31

Oregon 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Pemiscot 30 96.77% 1 3.23% 0 0.00% 31

Perry 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16

Phelps 23 56.10% 17 41.46% 1 2.44% 41

Pulaski 31 93.94% 2 6.06% 0 0.00% 33

Reynolds 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Ripley 22 95.65% 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 23

Scott 45 97.83% 1 2.17% 0 0.00% 46

Shannon 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

St Francois 67 83.75% 11 13.75% 2 2.50% 80

Ste Genevieve 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Stoddard 11 91.67% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12

Texas 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 11

Washington 22 88.00% 2 8.00% 1 4.00% 25

Wayne 11 84.62% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13

* Region Total * 603 89.33% 64 9.48% 8 1.19% 675

Southwest Barry 29 87.88% 3 9.09% 1 3.03% 33

Barton 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Bates 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Benton 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Camden 27 87.10% 4 12.90% 0 0.00% 31

Cedar 19 79.17% 5 20.83% 0 0.00% 24

Christian 66 78.57% 12 14.29% 6 7.14% 84

Dade 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Dallas 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17

Douglas 12 75.00% 4 25.00% 0 0.00% 16

Greene 344 86.43% 53 13.32% 1 0.25% 398

Henry 18 81.82% 3 13.64% 1 4.55% 22

Hickory 7 77.78% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 9

Jasper 115 97.46% 3 2.54% 0 0.00% 118

Laclede 38 86.36% 6 13.64% 0 0.00% 44

Lawrence 33 84.62% 4 10.26% 2 5.13% 39

McDonald 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18

Miller 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

Moniteau 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Morgan 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

Newton 53 96.36% 2 3.64% 0 0.00% 55

Ozark 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Polk 44 91.67% 4 8.33% 0 0.00% 48

St Clair 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Stone 28 84.85% 4 12.12% 1 3.03% 33

Taney 43 97.73% 1 2.27% 0 0.00% 44

Vernon 24 80.00% 5 16.67% 1 3.33% 30

Webster 29 90.63% 3 9.38% 0 0.00% 32

Wright 26 89.66% 3 10.35% 0 0.00% 29

* Region Total * 1,075 88.55% 125 10.30% 14 1.15% 1,214

Kansas City Jackson 424 77.37% 102 18.61% 22 4.02% 548

* Region Total * 424 77.37% 102 18.61% 22 4.02% 548

St. Louis St Louis City 106 54.92% 81 41.97% 6 3.11% 193

St Louis County 186 69.40% 78 29.10% 4 1.49% 268

* Region Total * 292 63.34% 159 34.49% 10 2.17% 461

Other Out Home Inv 160 94.12% 8 4.71% 2 1.18% 170

* Region Total * 160 94.12% 8 4.71% 2 1.18% 170

State Total 3,716 84.59% 608 13.84% 69 1.57% 4,393

0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact

9Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 16: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 5.

The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During May 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 9 90.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Atchison 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Buchanan 25 24.75% 1 0.99% 72 71.29% 3 2.97% 0 0.00% 101

Caldwell 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Carroll 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Cass 12 23.53% 7 13.73% 29 56.86% 3 5.88% 0 0.00% 51

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Clay 38 19.59% 4 2.06% 150 77.32% 2 1.03% 0 0.00% 194

Clinton 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cooper 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Daviess 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Grundy 4 33.33% 0 0.00% 7 58.33% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12

Harrison 3 23.08% 2 15.39% 7 53.85% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Johnson 5 23.81% 3 14.29% 13 61.91% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21

Lafayette 7 36.84% 1 5.26% 11 57.90% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19

Linn 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Livingston 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Nodaway 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Pettis 11 28.95% 0 0.00% 27 71.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 38

Platte 10 19.23% 4 7.69% 23 44.23% 15 28.85% 0 0.00% 52

Putnam 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Ray 8 22.86% 3 8.57% 23 65.71% 1 2.86% 0 0.00% 35

Saline 4 23.53% 2 11.77% 8 47.06% 3 17.65% 0 0.00% 17

Sullivan 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 149 23.50% 31 4.89% 420 66.25% 34 5.36% 0 0.00% 634

Northeast Adair 9 52.94% 1 5.88% 7 41.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 17

Audrain 10 31.25% 1 3.13% 21 65.63% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 32

Boone 8 18.18% 9 20.46% 16 36.36% 10 22.73% 1 2.27% 44

Callaway 9 33.33% 2 7.41% 15 55.56% 0 0.00% 1 3.70% 27

Clark 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cole 6 21.43% 4 14.29% 16 57.14% 2 7.14% 0 0.00% 28

Franklin 14 17.72% 6 7.60% 57 72.15% 2 2.53% 0 0.00% 79

Gasconade 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Howard 3 25.00% 6 50.00% 2 16.67% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12

Jefferson 19 13.10% 25 17.24% 57 39.31% 37 25.52% 7 4.83% 145

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 7 70.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Lincoln 13 27.08% 5 10.42% 29 60.42% 1 2.08% 0 0.00% 48

Macon 3 23.08% 3 23.08% 4 30.77% 3 23.08% 0 0.00% 13

Marion 11 27.50% 2 5.00% 21 52.50% 4 10.00% 2 5.00% 40

Monroe 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 6 60.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10

Montgomery 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Osage 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 8 72.73% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Pike 2 9.52% 0 0.00% 19 90.48% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21

Ralls 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 6 54.55% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Randolph 1 3.23% 12 38.71% 9 29.03% 6 19.36% 3 9.68% 31

Schuyler 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Scotland 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Shelby 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

St Charles 12 14.12% 3 3.53% 54 63.53% 12 14.12% 4 4.71% 85

Warren 10 32.26% 2 6.45% 19 61.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 31

* Region Total * 159 21.72% 85 11.61% 386 52.73% 84 11.48% 18 2.46% 732

Southeast Bollinger 1 10.00% 5 50.00% 2 20.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10

Butler 13 19.40% 15 22.39% 23 34.33% 16 23.88% 0 0.00% 67

Cape Girardeau 8 13.79% 11 18.97% 17 29.31% 19 32.76% 3 5.17% 58

Carter 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

Crawford 5 19.23% 1 3.85% 16 61.54% 4 15.39% 0 0.00% 26

Dent 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Investigations Assessments

0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days

Note: Investigations and Assessments reported

separately beginning July 2016. 10Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 17: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 5.

The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During May 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 5 50.00% 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 10

Howell 10 16.67% 12 20.00% 18 30.00% 19 31.67% 1 1.67% 60

Iron 5 55.56% 1 11.11% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Madison 6 46.15% 0 0.00% 7 53.85% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Maries 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7

Mississippi 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 13 92.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14

New Madrid 10 32.26% 7 22.58% 4 12.90% 7 22.58% 3 9.68% 31

Oregon 1 10.00% 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 40.00% 0 0.00% 10

Pemiscot 4 12.50% 4 12.50% 9 28.13% 4 12.50% 11 34.38% 32

Perry 2 12.50% 3 18.75% 2 12.50% 9 56.25% 0 0.00% 16

Phelps 4 8.89% 8 17.78% 13 28.89% 19 42.22% 1 2.22% 45

Pulaski 2 5.88% 7 20.59% 6 17.65% 17 50.00% 2 5.88% 34

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ripley 1 4.55% 1 4.55% 20 90.91% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22

Scott 19 40.43% 0 0.00% 28 59.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 47

Shannon 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

St Francois 28 33.74% 1 1.21% 54 65.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 83

Ste Genevieve 3 20.00% 0 0.00% 12 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15

Stoddard 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 9 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

Texas 0 0.00% 7 58.33% 3 25.00% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 12

Washington 10 37.04% 2 7.41% 15 55.56% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 27

Wayne 3 20.00% 1 6.67% 10 66.67% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

* Region Total * 141 20.52% 99 14.41% 296 43.09% 129 18.78% 22 3.20% 687

Southwest Barry 9 25.71% 2 5.71% 24 68.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 35

Barton 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 9 69.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Bates 6 40.00% 1 6.67% 8 53.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15

Benton 3 21.43% 0 0.00% 11 78.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14

Camden 12 36.36% 2 6.06% 19 57.58% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 33

Cedar 7 30.44% 0 0.00% 16 69.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 23

Christian 29 35.37% 2 2.44% 51 62.20% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 82

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Dallas 2 12.50% 2 12.50% 12 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16

Douglas 7 46.67% 0 0.00% 8 53.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15

Greene 106 26.70% 28 7.05% 243 61.21% 17 4.28% 3 0.76% 397

Henry 8 38.10% 1 4.76% 12 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21

Hickory 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Jasper 44 37.29% 2 1.70% 72 61.02% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 118

Laclede 22 46.81% 0 0.00% 25 53.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 47

Lawrence 9 25.00% 3 8.33% 24 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 36

McDonald 8 36.36% 0 0.00% 14 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22

Miller 3 23.08% 2 15.39% 7 53.85% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Moniteau 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 7 70.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10

Morgan 6 40.00% 1 6.67% 7 46.67% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

Newton 13 24.53% 0 0.00% 40 75.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 53

Ozark 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Polk 12 26.09% 4 8.70% 24 52.17% 5 10.87% 1 2.17% 46

St Clair 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8

Stone 14 36.84% 0 0.00% 24 63.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 38

Taney 10 22.73% 4 9.09% 24 54.55% 6 13.64% 0 0.00% 44

Vernon 12 36.36% 0 0.00% 21 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 33

Webster 10 31.25% 0 0.00% 22 68.75% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 32

Wright 8 27.59% 3 10.35% 14 48.28% 4 13.79% 0 0.00% 29

* Region Total * 375 30.46% 57 4.63% 757 61.50% 37 3.01% 5 0.41% 1,231

Kansas City Jackson 131 22.90% 28 4.90% 379 66.26% 33 5.77% 1 0.18% 572

* Region Total * 131 22.90% 28 4.90% 379 66.26% 33 5.77% 1 0.18% 572

St. Louis St Louis City 33 14.16% 49 21.03% 72 30.90% 75 32.19% 4 1.72% 233

St Louis County 29 8.95% 73 22.53% 124 38.27% 63 19.44% 35 10.80% 324

* Region Total * 62 11.13% 122 21.90% 196 35.19% 138 24.78% 39 7.00% 557

Other Out Home Inv 132 77.19% 3 1.75% 36 21.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 171

* Region Total * 132 77.19% 3 1.75% 36 21.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 171

State Total 1,149 25.07% 425 9.27% 2,470 53.88% 455 9.93% 85 1.85% 4,584

0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days

Investigations Assessments

Note: Investigations and Assessments reported

separately beginning July 2016. 11Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 18: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 6.

CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During May 2019

CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N

CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality

Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total

Northwest Andrew 6 9 1 0 1 2 0 19

Atchison 1 2 0 0 2 3 0 8

Buchanan 39 87 5 9 8 27 0 175

Caldwell 4 5 0 0 1 0 0 10

Carroll 1 5 0 1 2 2 0 11

Cass 31 54 4 8 8 23 0 128

Chariton 5 3 0 1 0 3 0 12

Clay 59 119 10 11 27 31 0 257

Clinton 7 14 2 0 1 1 0 25

Cooper 3 4 0 1 0 3 0 11

Daviess 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 10

De Kalb 2 4 2 0 0 1 0 9

Gentry 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 6

Grundy 9 13 0 0 2 1 0 25

Harrison 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 7

Holt 3 2 0 1 0 2 0 8

Johnson 12 26 1 4 3 6 0 52

Lafayette 9 16 4 3 2 3 0 37

Linn 5 11 1 1 1 2 0 21

Livingston 2 7 0 0 1 4 0 14

Mercer 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 4

Nodaway 4 5 3 1 1 2 0 16

Pettis 20 23 4 4 4 5 0 60

Platte 25 47 6 4 7 5 0 94

Putnam 6 1 1 0 1 0 0 9

Ray 11 16 1 1 3 8 0 40

Saline 5 16 6 1 1 1 0 30

Sullivan 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 6

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

* Region Total * 281 504 52 53 76 139 0 1,105

Northeast Adair 4 16 0 1 3 1 0 25

Audrain 6 15 3 1 3 7 0 35

Boone 46 76 6 11 10 28 0 177

Callaway 14 32 1 7 5 14 0 73

Clark 0 4 1 0 1 1 0 7

Cole 20 36 5 7 3 8 0 79

Franklin 35 55 0 18 9 14 0 131

Gasconade 5 12 0 1 1 2 0 21

Howard 4 8 0 0 0 2 0 14

Jefferson 51 88 10 16 10 30 0 205

Knox 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 5

Lewis 4 5 1 0 0 1 0 11

Lincoln 18 34 3 1 4 10 0 70

Macon 5 9 0 0 0 7 0 21

Marion 13 23 3 7 4 12 0 62

Monroe 0 7 0 0 0 2 0 9

Montgomery 8 9 1 3 1 1 0 23

Osage 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 5

Pike 1 19 1 3 2 3 0 29

Ralls 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 7

Randolph 6 19 4 2 3 8 0 42

Schuyler 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 4

Scotland 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 6

Shelby 3 4 0 0 3 1 0 11

St Charles 66 123 5 14 21 33 0 262

Warren 16 25 0 2 5 3 0 51

* Region Total * 332 628 47 96 89 193 0 1,385

Southeast Bollinger 5 8 0 0 0 1 0 14

Butler 17 31 0 4 2 12 0 66

Cape Girardeau 26 33 2 2 5 12 0 80

Carter 2 4 0 1 0 2 0 9

Crawford 14 19 1 7 1 6 0 48

Dent 3 8 0 2 0 3 0 16

12Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 19: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 6.

CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During May 2019

CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N

CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality

Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total

Southeast Dunklin 13 14 2 5 3 11 0 48

Howell 21 32 4 6 3 9 0 75

Iron 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 8

Madison 5 5 0 3 2 2 0 17

Maries 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 8

Mississippi 3 12 0 0 4 4 0 23

New Madrid 5 10 0 2 1 4 0 22

Oregon 5 6 2 0 1 8 0 22

Pemiscot 8 6 1 3 2 6 0 26

Perry 4 11 0 0 1 3 0 19

Phelps 10 24 0 1 3 5 0 43

Pulaski 14 31 1 5 2 9 0 62

Reynolds 2 4 0 5 0 3 0 14

Ripley 5 5 1 0 2 5 0 18

Scott 17 32 2 1 3 7 0 62

Shannon 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 5

St Francois 17 50 3 5 10 18 0 103

Ste Genevieve 3 6 1 0 3 3 0 16

Stoddard 11 23 3 0 1 6 0 44

Texas 5 15 1 3 0 2 0 26

Washington 9 25 1 4 3 4 0 46

Wayne 6 6 0 1 1 2 0 16

* Region Total * 235 425 27 66 54 149 0 956

Southwest Barry 5 13 2 4 2 6 0 32

Barton 2 13 1 1 2 1 0 20

Bates 3 5 0 0 2 2 0 12

Benton 7 10 0 2 3 1 0 23

Camden 12 21 2 4 2 12 0 53

Cedar 4 9 1 1 1 4 0 20

Christian 20 40 5 1 8 24 0 98

Dade 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 4

Dallas 10 3 0 0 3 4 0 20

Douglas 8 4 0 0 1 4 0 17

Greene 119 237 23 14 51 79 0 523

Henry 11 14 2 1 2 1 0 31

Hickory 3 8 1 1 1 4 0 18

Jasper 54 82 9 8 10 35 0 198

Laclede 18 27 2 2 4 12 0 65

Lawrence 18 23 2 2 4 10 0 59

McDonald 6 14 1 3 2 3 0 29

Miller 7 6 3 2 3 10 0 31

Moniteau 4 7 1 0 0 2 0 14

Morgan 7 18 1 1 1 8 0 36

Newton 14 22 0 1 1 11 0 49

Ozark 3 5 0 2 1 4 0 15

Polk 20 29 0 4 18 13 0 84

St Clair 2 5 0 1 1 4 0 13

Stone 8 17 3 1 1 9 0 39

Taney 28 40 1 5 6 15 0 95

Vernon 10 11 1 0 4 3 0 29

Webster 10 25 2 1 3 7 0 48

Wright 6 15 1 1 3 3 0 29

* Region Total * 421 723 64 63 141 292 0 1,704

Kansas City Jackson 298 451 49 99 67 151 0 1,115

* Region Total * 298 451 49 99 67 151 0 1,115

St. Louis St Louis City 111 192 19 63 22 55 0 462

St Louis County 212 364 25 67 43 78 0 789

* Region Total * 323 556 44 130 65 133 0 1,251

Other Out Home Inv 171 3 0 0 0 0 0 174

Out Of State 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 14

Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 78

* Region Total * 174 14 0 0 0 0 78 266

State Total 2,064 3,301 283 507 492 1,057 78 7,782

13Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 20: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0% 0%

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

7,500M

ay-1

5

Au

g-1

5

No

v-1

5

Feb

-16

May

-16

Au

g-1

6

No

v-1

6

Feb

-17

May

-17

Au

g-1

7

No

v-1

7

Feb

-18

May

-18

Au

g-1

8

No

v-1

8

Feb

-19

May

-19

Figure 2.

Child Abuse & Neglect Reports

May 2015 Through May 2019

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

7,500

Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Figure 3.

Child Abuse & Neglect Reports

June 2017 Through May 2019

Jun 2017 to May 2018 Jun 2018 to May 2019

14Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 21: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0% 0%

-30%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 4.

Percentage Change in CA/N Reports

Made Twelve Months Apart May 2018 and May 2019

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 5.

CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed

During May 2019 by Conclusion

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other

15Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 22: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0% 0%

Substantiated 6%

Unsubstantiated P S I 3%

Unsubstantiated 21%

Family Assessment 67%

Other 3%

Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed

During May 2019 by Conclusion

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 7.

Time Between Report and Child Contact

For Investigations/Assessments Completed in May 2019

Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact

16Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 23: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 8a.

CA/N Investigations Completed

During May 2019

Within 45 Days More Than 45 Days

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 8b.

CA/N Assessments Completed

During May 2019

Within 45 Days Within 46-90 Days More Than 90 Days

17Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 24: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 18 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures

Table 1.

• Based upon incidents and children reported during the month.

• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents

during any given month).

Table 2.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents

during any given month).

• Conclusions are as follows:

Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence, Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified

Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated

Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-

Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe,

Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,

Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed

Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation),

Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)

• Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

Table 3.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,

Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated

Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated

Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-

cooperative/Child Safe, Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days,

Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,

Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed

Page 25: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 19 Research and Data Analysis

Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,

Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School

Investigation)

Table 4.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include

information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-

Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.

Table 5.

• Based upon incidents concluded during the month.

Table 6.

• Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.

• Administrative referrals are not included.

Figure 2. and Figure 3.

• Based upon incidents reported during the month.

Figure 4.

• Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same month of the previous year.

Figure 5. and Figure 6.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,

Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified

Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated

Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-

cooperative/Child Safe,

Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,

Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed

Page 26: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 20 Research and Data Analysis

Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,

Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School

Investigation)

• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.

• Figures do not include information on expunged reports and reports where the only

alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already

Investigated.

Figure 7.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include

information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-

Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.

Figure 8a. and Figure 8b.

• Based upon investigations and assessments completed during the month.

Page 27: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Family-Centered Services

Page 28: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 7.

Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of May 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 2 0 3

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Buchanan 5 3 1 2 25 1 37

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 4 5 3 0 7 1 20

Chariton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Clay 0 2 3 2 3 0 10

Clinton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Cooper 0 1 1 0 1 0 3

Daviess 0 2 0 0 2 0 4

De Kalb 1 1 0 1 1 0 4

Gentry 0 0 0 0 6 0 6

Grundy 0 3 0 0 4 0 7

Harrison 0 0 1 0 3 0 4

Holt 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Johnson 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Lafayette 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Linn 0 2 3 0 2 1 8

Livingston 0 0 0 0 6 0 6

Mercer 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Nodaway 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Pettis 4 2 0 0 5 0 11

Platte 1 3 0 1 1 0 6

Putnam 0 3 0 0 5 0 8

Ray 1 1 0 0 3 0 5

Saline 0 0 0 1 5 0 6

Sullivan 0 0 1 0 1 0 2

Worth 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

* Region Total * 16 33 14 10 91 4 168

Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 11 0 12

Audrain 3 1 1 1 9 2 17

Boone 7 10 6 4 34 6 67

Callaway 5 2 0 0 15 4 26

Clark 0 2 0 0 2 1 5

Cole 0 0 0 0 12 0 12

Franklin 9 12 0 8 23 0 52

Gasconade 1 5 0 0 6 0 12

Howard 0 1 0 0 5 0 6

Jefferson 0 5 4 5 64 2 80

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 1 0 0 0 3 0 4

Lincoln 0 3 3 2 12 0 20

Macon 0 3 0 0 6 0 9

Marion 3 3 1 1 8 0 16

Monroe 0 2 0 0 1 0 3

Montgomery 0 3 0 1 1 0 5

Osage 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Pike 1 4 1 0 3 0 9

Ralls 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

Randolph 0 2 0 3 11 0 16

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Scotland 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Shelby 0 4 0 0 2 0 6

St Charles 0 0 0 2 19 0 21

Warren 0 3 0 0 9 0 12

* Region Total * 31 69 16 27 264 15 422

Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 0 6 0 7

Butler 1 14 1 6 8 0 30

Cape Girardeau 3 4 2 1 61 3 74

Carter 3 0 0 0 4 0 7

Crawford 1 1 0 1 7 0 10

Dent 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

22Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 29: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 7.

Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of May 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Southeast Dunklin 0 2 0 0 11 0 13

Howell 2 3 0 5 30 0 40

Iron 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Madison 0 0 0 1 4 0 5

Maries 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Mississippi 0 3 0 4 5 0 12

New Madrid 0 3 0 4 17 0 24

Oregon 0 1 0 1 7 0 9

Pemiscot 0 1 0 0 22 0 23

Perry 0 4 0 1 10 0 15

Phelps 1 5 2 1 11 0 20

Pulaski 1 2 0 3 13 0 19

Reynolds 0 0 0 1 4 0 5

Ripley 2 0 0 0 3 0 5

Scott 0 1 0 6 13 0 20

Shannon 0 0 0 1 3 0 4

St Francois 2 7 0 0 27 0 36

Ste Genevieve 0 2 0 0 2 0 4

Stoddard 0 6 0 0 6 1 13

Texas 1 2 0 0 12 0 15

Washington 0 2 0 0 6 1 9

Wayne 0 2 0 0 5 0 7

* Region Total * 18 69 5 38 304 5 439

Southwest Barry 0 1 0 0 9 0 10

Barton 0 2 1 1 0 0 4

Bates 0 1 1 2 5 0 9

Benton 0 1 0 2 3 1 7

Camden 0 1 0 1 15 0 17

Cedar 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Christian 0 1 0 1 10 1 13

Dade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Dallas 1 4 0 1 10 0 16

Douglas 0 1 0 0 5 0 6

Greene 0 6 0 0 83 0 89

Henry 0 1 1 1 20 0 23

Hickory 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Jasper 0 28 1 2 86 0 117

Laclede 2 6 1 3 14 0 26

Lawrence 0 4 0 0 20 0 24

McDonald 0 0 0 0 3 1 4

Miller 0 8 0 0 20 0 28

Moniteau 0 1 0 0 7 0 8

Morgan 1 1 0 0 7 0 9

Newton 0 2 0 1 4 0 7

Ozark 0 2 1 0 1 0 4

Polk 1 0 0 0 2 0 3

St Clair 0 0 0 0 7 0 7

Stone 0 6 2 0 5 0 13

Taney 0 3 0 2 27 1 33

Vernon 0 0 2 0 3 0 5

Webster 0 2 0 2 14 0 18

Wright 0 0 0 0 10 0 10

* Region Total * 5 85 10 19 397 4 520

Kansas City Jackson 0 4 16 20 102 55 197

* Region Total * 0 4 16 20 102 55 197

St. Louis St Louis City 1 3 1 0 35 2 42

St Louis County 10 6 21 5 36 10 88

* Region Total * 11 9 22 5 71 12 130

State Total 81 269 83 119 1,229 95 1,876

23Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 30: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 8.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During May 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 2 2 0 4

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Buchanan 6 4 1 2 28 1 42

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 4 5 4 0 7 2 22

Chariton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Clay 0 4 4 2 3 0 13

Clinton 0 2 0 0 1 0 3

Cooper 0 1 1 0 1 0 3

Daviess 0 2 0 0 2 0 4

De Kalb 1 1 0 1 1 0 4

Gentry 0 0 0 0 6 0 6

Grundy 0 3 0 0 5 0 8

Harrison 0 0 1 0 3 0 4

Holt 0 1 0 1 1 0 3

Johnson 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Lafayette 0 1 0 1 3 0 5

Linn 0 2 3 0 3 1 9

Livingston 0 0 0 0 7 0 7

Mercer 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Nodaway 0 1 0 1 4 0 6

Pettis 4 2 0 0 5 0 11

Platte 1 3 0 1 1 0 6

Putnam 0 3 0 0 5 0 8

Ray 1 1 0 0 3 0 5

Saline 0 0 0 1 5 0 6

Sullivan 0 0 1 0 1 0 2

Worth 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

* Region Total * 17 38 16 12 101 5 189

Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 11 0 12

Audrain 3 1 1 1 9 2 17

Boone 7 12 7 4 42 7 79

Callaway 5 2 0 0 15 4 26

Clark 0 2 0 0 2 1 5

Cole 1 2 0 0 16 0 19

Franklin 10 15 0 10 28 0 63

Gasconade 1 5 0 0 6 0 12

Howard 0 1 0 0 7 0 8

Jefferson 0 5 4 6 73 2 90

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 1 0 0 0 3 0 4

Lincoln 0 3 5 4 14 0 26

Macon 0 3 0 0 7 0 10

Marion 3 4 1 1 8 0 17

Monroe 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

Montgomery 0 3 0 1 1 0 5

Osage 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Pike 1 5 1 0 4 0 11

Ralls 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

Randolph 0 3 0 3 14 0 20

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Scotland 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Shelby 0 4 0 0 3 0 7

St Charles 0 1 0 3 33 0 37

Warren 0 3 0 0 9 0 12

* Region Total * 33 81 19 33 314 16 496

Southeast Bollinger 0 2 0 0 7 0 9

Butler 1 19 2 8 8 0 38

Cape Girardeau 3 5 2 2 69 3 84

Carter 3 0 0 0 4 0 7

Crawford 1 1 0 2 9 0 13

Dent 1 0 0 1 3 0 5

24Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 31: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 8.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During May 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Southeast Dunklin 0 2 0 0 11 1 14

Howell 2 3 0 5 30 0 40

Iron 0 3 0 0 4 0 7

Madison 0 2 0 1 8 0 11

Maries 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Mississippi 0 3 0 5 6 0 14

New Madrid 0 3 0 4 18 0 25

Oregon 0 2 0 1 7 0 10

Pemiscot 0 1 0 1 25 0 27

Perry 0 4 0 1 12 1 18

Phelps 1 5 2 1 11 0 20

Pulaski 1 2 0 4 14 0 21

Reynolds 0 0 0 1 5 0 6

Ripley 2 1 0 1 3 0 7

Scott 0 1 0 6 16 0 23

Shannon 0 0 0 1 3 0 4

St Francois 2 7 0 0 36 0 45

Ste Genevieve 0 2 0 0 2 1 5

Stoddard 0 7 0 0 11 2 20

Texas 1 2 0 0 12 0 15

Washington 0 3 0 1 8 1 13

Wayne 0 2 0 0 5 0 7

* Region Total * 18 83 6 47 349 9 512

Southwest Barry 0 1 0 0 9 0 10

Barton 0 2 1 1 0 0 4

Bates 0 1 1 2 8 0 12

Benton 0 1 0 2 3 1 7

Camden 0 1 0 2 20 0 23

Cedar 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Christian 0 1 0 2 12 1 16

Dade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Dallas 1 7 0 1 10 0 19

Douglas 0 1 0 0 7 0 8

Greene 0 6 0 0 100 0 106

Henry 0 1 1 1 24 0 27

Hickory 1 1 0 0 3 0 5

Jasper 0 28 1 2 91 0 122

Laclede 3 6 1 3 17 0 30

Lawrence 0 4 0 0 25 0 29

McDonald 0 0 0 0 4 1 5

Miller 0 8 0 0 21 0 29

Moniteau 0 1 0 0 9 0 10

Morgan 1 1 0 0 12 1 15

Newton 0 2 0 1 7 0 10

Ozark 0 3 1 0 3 0 7

Polk 1 0 0 0 3 0 4

St Clair 0 0 0 0 7 0 7

Stone 0 6 2 0 5 0 13

Taney 0 3 0 2 28 1 34

Vernon 1 0 2 0 5 0 8

Webster 0 2 0 2 19 0 23

Wright 0 0 0 0 12 0 12

* Region Total * 8 89 10 21 469 5 602

Kansas City Jackson 1 5 17 26 113 61 223

* Region Total * 1 5 17 26 113 61 223

St. Louis St Louis City 1 3 1 2 49 3 59

St Louis County 12 7 23 5 37 11 95

* Region Total * 13 10 24 7 86 14 154

State Total 90 306 92 146 1,432 110 2,176

25Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 32: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 9.

Persons in Family-Centered Services During May 2019

Child Total Persons with

Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action

Northwest Andrew 7 7 0 14 0

Atchison 1 2 0 3 2

Buchanan 83 106 1 190 5

Caldwell 3 3 0 6 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 40 47 0 87 14

Chariton 1 2 0 3 2

Clay 27 30 0 57 5

Clinton 4 7 0 11 0

Cooper 5 6 0 11 0

Daviess 18 6 0 24 0

De Kalb 8 5 0 13 0

Gentry 8 17 0 25 13

Grundy 17 18 0 35 6

Harrison 10 10 0 20 2

Holt 4 8 0 12 1

Johnson 3 4 0 7 0

Lafayette 13 14 0 27 4

Linn 12 16 0 28 3

Livingston 14 16 0 30 1

Mercer 2 3 0 5 0

Nodaway 9 11 0 20 5

Pettis 18 20 0 38 6

Platte 16 19 0 35 7

Putnam 16 21 0 37 4

Ray 11 9 0 20 0

Saline 10 13 0 23 3

Sullivan 6 6 0 12 2

Worth 4 3 0 7 2

* Region Total * 370 429 1 800 87

Northeast Adair 18 35 0 53 8

Audrain 30 47 0 77 12

Boone 152 176 0 328 38

Callaway 52 66 0 118 22

Clark 9 18 0 27 11

Cole 39 36 0 75 11

Franklin 178 144 0 322 27

Gasconade 27 33 0 60 8

Howard 18 19 0 37 4

Jefferson 207 183 2 392 52

Knox 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 8 7 0 15 1

Lincoln 55 61 0 116 13

Macon 20 33 0 53 1

Marion 33 50 0 83 11

Monroe 8 10 0 18 2

Montgomery 6 11 0 17 2

Osage 10 12 2 24 3

Pike 23 26 0 49 7

Ralls 6 8 0 14 1

Randolph 36 34 0 70 11

Schuyler 7 7 0 14 0

Scotland 2 3 0 5 0

Shelby 11 23 0 34 8

St Charles 72 86 0 158 20

Warren 26 28 0 54 6

* Region Total * 1,053 1,156 4 2,213 279

Southeast Bollinger 17 18 0 35 8

Butler 71 77 0 148 8

Cape Girardeau 145 210 0 355 42

Carter 16 14 0 30 0

Crawford 31 27 0 58 5

Dent 11 9 0 20 4

26Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 33: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 9.

Persons in Family-Centered Services During May 2019

Child Total Persons with

Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action

Southeast Dunklin 19 44 0 63 13

Howell 75 88 0 163 9

Iron 13 15 0 28 8

Madison 24 21 0 45 3

Maries 7 8 0 15 2

Mississippi 24 31 0 55 9

New Madrid 39 57 0 96 19

Oregon 30 30 0 60 5

Pemiscot 47 58 0 105 5

Perry 32 38 0 70 13

Phelps 31 40 0 71 19

Pulaski 41 42 0 83 6

Reynolds 22 15 0 37 5

Ripley 15 15 0 30 3

Scott 39 46 0 85 4

Shannon 9 11 0 20 0

St Francois 93 95 0 188 15

Ste Genevieve 10 16 0 26 4

Stoddard 31 41 0 72 20

Texas 34 48 0 82 16

Washington 29 31 1 61 3

Wayne 15 13 0 28 0

* Region Total * 970 1,158 1 2,129 248

Southwest Barry 16 22 0 38 2

Barton 8 5 0 13 1

Bates 22 29 0 51 8

Benton 12 14 0 26 1

Camden 42 52 0 94 6

Cedar 12 21 0 33 7

Christian 24 31 0 55 10

Dade 3 3 0 6 0

Dallas 33 44 0 77 8

Douglas 16 10 0 26 0

Greene 237 257 2 496 47

Henry 57 68 0 125 14

Hickory 7 16 0 23 6

Jasper 212 281 0 493 67

Laclede 68 62 0 130 5

Lawrence 53 70 0 123 24

McDonald 12 20 0 32 10

Miller 64 67 0 131 11

Moniteau 27 23 0 50 4

Morgan 32 42 0 74 1

Newton 15 23 0 38 10

Ozark 12 16 0 28 8

Polk 6 13 0 19 2

St Clair 14 14 0 28 3

Stone 23 25 0 48 4

Taney 58 69 0 127 6

Vernon 18 16 0 34 2

Webster 48 65 0 113 12

Wright 21 25 0 46 10

* Region Total * 1,172 1,403 2 2,577 289

Kansas City Jackson 392 508 0 900 252

* Region Total * 392 508 0 900 252

St. Louis St Louis City 98 144 0 242 39

St Louis County 161 203 0 364 53

* Region Total * 259 347 0 606 92

State Total 4,216 5,001 8 9,225 1,247

27Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 34: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 10.

Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During May 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 3 0 0 0 6 0 9

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 1 1 1 0 2 0 5

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 1 3 0 1 0 5

Clinton 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Grundy 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Linn 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 2 0 0 0 1 0 3

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Ray 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Saline 0 0 0 1 2 0 3

Sullivan 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 7 3 5 2 20 0 37

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Audrain 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Boone 0 2 0 1 3 1 7

Callaway 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Clark 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Cole 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Franklin 0 1 0 2 3 0 6

Gasconade 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Howard 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Jefferson 0 2 0 1 6 0 9

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Macon 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Marion 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Monroe 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 2 0 2 2 0 6

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

St Charles 0 0 0 0 5 0 5

Warren 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

* Region Total * 2 17 0 6 35 1 61

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Butler 0 2 0 1 4 0 7

Cape Girardeau 1 1 1 0 5 2 10

Carter 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Crawford 0 0 0 1 4 0 5

Dent 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

28Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 35: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 10.

Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During May 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Southeast Dunklin 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Howell 2 1 0 1 3 0 7

Iron 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Madison 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

New Madrid 0 0 0 1 3 0 4

Oregon 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Perry 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Phelps 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Pulaski 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Reynolds 0 0 0 1 1 0 2

Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 1 0 1 5 0 7

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 0 0 0 10 0 10

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Texas 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Washington 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Wayne 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

* Region Total * 3 10 1 7 58 2 81

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Camden 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Christian 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 3 0 0 4 0 7

Douglas 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Greene 0 0 0 0 18 0 18

Henry 0 0 1 0 3 0 4

Hickory 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Jasper 0 4 0 0 19 0 23

Laclede 2 1 0 1 1 0 5

Lawrence 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

McDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 0 5 0 5

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Newton 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Ozark 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Taney 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Vernon 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Webster 0 1 0 0 5 0 6

Wright 0 0 0 0 4 0 4

* Region Total * 3 14 1 1 79 0 98

Kansas City Jackson 0 0 3 4 22 2 31

* Region Total * 0 0 3 4 22 2 31

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 0 6 0 6

St Louis County 0 0 2 0 2 1 5

* Region Total * 0 0 2 0 8 1 11

State Total 15 44 12 20 222 6 319

29Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 36: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 11.

Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During May 2019

by Close Reason

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed

Northwest Andrew 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3

Clinton 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Linn 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Livingston 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Pettis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 11 50.00% 11 50.00% 22

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 6 50.00% 6 50.00% 12

Callaway 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 7

Franklin 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 11

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Jefferson 8 72.73% 3 27.27% 11

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6

Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Marion 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Monroe 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Charles 10 62.50% 6 37.50% 16

Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 50 64.10% 28 35.90% 78

Southeast Bollinger 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Butler 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8

Cape Girardeau 5 50.00% 5 50.00% 10

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Crawford 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Dent 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Goal Achieved Other

30Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 37: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 11.

Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During May 2019

by Close Reason

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed

Southeast Dunklin 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Madison 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

New Madrid 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Oregon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pemiscot 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Perry 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pulaski 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Reynolds 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Ripley 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Scott 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 5 55.56% 4 44.44% 9

Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stoddard 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 43 57.33% 32 42.67% 75

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Douglas 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Greene 5 26.32% 14 73.68% 19

Henry 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4

Hickory 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Jasper 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5

Laclede 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Lawrence 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6

McDonald 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Moniteau 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Morgan 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6

Newton 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Ozark 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Polk 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Vernon 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Webster 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 6

Wright 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

* Region Total * 51 57.96% 37 42.05% 88

Kansas City Jackson 16 59.26% 11 40.74% 27

* Region Total * 16 59.26% 11 40.74% 27

St. Louis St Louis City 8 47.06% 9 52.94% 17

St Louis County 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7

* Region Total * 12 50.00% 12 50.00% 24

State Total 183 58.28% 131 41.72% 314

Goal Achieved Other

31Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 38: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 12.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During May 2019

Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Buchanan 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 4 57.14% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Chariton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clay 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 5

Grundy 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Harrison 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Holt 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Linn 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 3

Pettis 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Platte 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Putnam 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

* Region Total * 22 48.89% 10 22.22% 9 20.00% 4 8.89% 45

Northeast Adair 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Audrain 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Boone 11 45.83% 3 12.50% 4 16.67% 6 25.00% 24

Callaway 6 46.15% 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 3 23.08% 13

Clark 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cole 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Franklin 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 2 28.57% 7

Gasconade 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Howard 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Jefferson 10 30.30% 10 30.30% 3 9.09% 10 30.30% 33

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lincoln 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 6

Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Marion 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 5

Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Osage 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Pike 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 3

Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Randolph 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 7

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

St Charles 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 9

Warren 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

* Region Total * 61 43.57% 27 19.29% 16 11.43% 36 25.71% 140

Southeast Bollinger 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Butler 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Cape Girardeau 10 62.50% 3 18.75% 1 6.25% 2 12.50% 16

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Crawford 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Dent 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

32Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 39: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 12.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During May 2019

Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Southeast Dunklin 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Howell 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Iron 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Madison 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Maries 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Mississippi 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

New Madrid 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6

Oregon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pemiscot 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Perry 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Phelps 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7

Pulaski 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Reynolds 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Ripley 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Scott 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stoddard 4 44.44% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Texas 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4

Washington 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 58 56.86% 30 29.41% 7 6.86% 7 6.86% 102

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Bates 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Camden 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cedar 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Christian 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 13 56.52% 6 26.09% 0 0.00% 4 17.39% 23

Henry 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 6

Hickory 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Jasper 23 60.53% 8 21.05% 4 10.53% 3 7.90% 38

Laclede 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Lawrence 5 55.56% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 9

McDonald 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Miller 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Moniteau 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Newton 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Ozark 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stone 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Taney 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 5

Vernon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Webster 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6

Wright 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

* Region Total * 79 55.25% 35 24.48% 11 7.69% 18 12.59% 143

Kansas City Jackson 54 40.91% 33 25.00% 18 13.64% 27 20.46% 132

* Region Total * 54 40.91% 33 25.00% 18 13.64% 27 20.46% 132

St. Louis St Louis City 6 31.58% 2 10.53% 1 5.26% 10 52.63% 19

St Louis County 8 21.05% 2 5.26% 7 18.42% 21 55.26% 38

* Region Total * 14 24.56% 4 7.02% 8 14.04% 31 54.39% 57

State Total 288 46.53% 139 22.46% 69 11.15% 123 19.87% 619

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

33Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 40: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 13.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During May 2019

Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Northwest Andrew 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 25 67.57% 8 21.62% 2 5.41% 2 5.41% 37

Caldwell 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 9 60.00% 4 26.67% 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 15

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 10 90.91% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 11

Clinton 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cooper 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Daviess 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

De Kalb 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Gentry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Grundy 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Harrison 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Holt 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lafayette 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Linn 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6

Livingston 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Nodaway 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Pettis 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Platte 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Putnam 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Ray 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Saline 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Worth 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 99 68.75% 29 20.14% 7 4.86% 9 6.25% 144

Northeast Adair 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Audrain 8 61.54% 3 23.08% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13

Boone 21 38.18% 8 14.55% 13 23.64% 13 23.64% 55

Callaway 7 53.85% 5 38.46% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Clark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Cole 11 84.62% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Franklin 27 48.21% 16 28.57% 10 17.86% 3 5.36% 56

Gasconade 5 55.56% 3 33.33% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

Howard 5 71.43% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Jefferson 32 56.14% 15 26.32% 5 8.77% 5 8.77% 57

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Lincoln 13 65.00% 6 30.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 20

Macon 4 44.44% 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9

Marion 7 58.33% 3 25.00% 1 8.33% 1 8.33% 12

Monroe 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Montgomery 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Osage 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Pike 4 50.00% 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Randolph 12 92.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 13

Schuyler 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Shelby 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

St Charles 27 96.43% 1 3.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 28

Warren 7 87.50% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

* Region Total * 214 60.11% 78 21.91% 40 11.24% 24 6.74% 356

Southeast Bollinger 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Butler 21 67.74% 7 22.58% 2 6.45% 1 3.23% 31

Cape Girardeau 41 60.29% 12 17.65% 5 7.35% 10 14.71% 68

Carter 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Crawford 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Dent 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

34Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 41: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 13.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During May 2019

Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Southeast Dunklin 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Howell 21 55.26% 9 23.68% 6 15.79% 2 5.26% 38

Iron 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Madison 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9

Maries 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Mississippi 6 60.00% 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 10

New Madrid 7 36.84% 5 26.32% 1 5.26% 6 31.58% 19

Oregon 4 44.44% 2 22.22% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9

Pemiscot 14 56.00% 7 28.00% 2 8.00% 2 8.00% 25

Perry 6 50.00% 4 33.33% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 12

Phelps 7 53.85% 5 38.46% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Pulaski 15 75.00% 2 10.00% 1 5.00% 2 10.00% 20

Reynolds 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Ripley 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Scott 10 50.00% 7 35.00% 1 5.00% 2 10.00% 20

Shannon 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

St Francois 20 54.05% 7 18.92% 7 18.92% 3 8.11% 37

Ste Genevieve 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4

Stoddard 8 72.73% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Texas 7 63.64% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 11

Washington 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Wayne 4 57.14% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 7

* Region Total * 247 60.24% 91 22.20% 41 10.00% 31 7.56% 410

Southwest Barry 5 62.50% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Barton 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Bates 4 50.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Benton 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Camden 13 65.00% 6 30.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 20

Cedar 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4

Christian 7 77.78% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 9

Dade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dallas 9 56.25% 5 31.25% 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 16

Douglas 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Greene 45 54.22% 25 30.12% 5 6.02% 8 9.64% 83

Henry 12 57.14% 4 19.05% 4 19.05% 1 4.76% 21

Hickory 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Jasper 60 71.43% 12 14.29% 8 9.52% 4 4.76% 84

Laclede 14 51.85% 12 44.44% 0 0.00% 1 3.70% 27

Lawrence 11 55.00% 5 25.00% 2 10.00% 2 10.00% 20

McDonald 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Miller 15 71.43% 6 28.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21

Moniteau 4 50.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 8

Morgan 6 42.86% 5 35.71% 0 0.00% 3 21.43% 14

Newton 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Ozark 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Polk 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

St Clair 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

Stone 3 30.00% 3 30.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 10

Taney 11 37.93% 7 24.14% 5 17.24% 6 20.69% 29

Vernon 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 7

Webster 12 70.59% 4 23.53% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17

Wright 8 88.89% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

* Region Total * 269 58.61% 115 25.05% 42 9.15% 33 7.19% 459

Kansas City Jackson 73 78.50% 11 11.83% 4 4.30% 5 5.38% 93

* Region Total * 73 78.50% 11 11.83% 4 4.30% 5 5.38% 93

St. Louis St Louis City 21 52.50% 10 25.00% 5 12.50% 4 10.00% 40

St Louis County 15 26.32% 16 28.07% 12 21.05% 14 24.56% 57

* Region Total * 36 37.11% 26 26.80% 17 17.53% 18 18.56% 97

State Total 938 60.17% 350 22.45% 151 9.69% 120 7.70% 1,559

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

35Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 42: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Note: FCS cases with associated AC functions opened were automatically closed March 1, 2017 due to a policy change.

1,500

2,500

3,500

4,500

5,500

6,500

7,500

8,500

9,500

10,500

11,500

May-1

5

Jul-15

Sep-1

5

Nov-1

5

Jan-1

6

Mar-

16

May-1

6

Jul-16

Sep-1

6

Nov-1

6

Jan-1

7

Mar-

17

May-1

7

Jul-17

Sep-1

7

Nov-1

7

Jan-1

8

Mar-

18

May-1

8

Jul-18

Sep-1

8

Nov-1

8

Jan-1

9

Mar-

19

May-1

9

Figure 9.

FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month

May 2015 Through May 2019

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 10.

Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active

as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart May 2018 and May 2019

36Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 43: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 11.

FCS Cases Opened During May 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance of Evidence Preventive Services Court Ordered

Newborn Crisis Assessment Family Assessment AC Closed/FCS Reopen

Court Ordered 4%

Preponderance of Evidence

5%

Newborn Crisis Assessment

6%

Family Assessment 69%

AC Closed/FCS Reopen 2%

Preventive Services 14%

Figure 12.

FCS Cases Opened During May 2019

by Reason for Opening

37Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 44: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 13. FCS Cases Closed During May 2019

by Reason for Closing

Goal Achieved Other Reason

0 to 3 Months 47%

4 to 7 Months 22%

8 to 11 Months 11%

12+ Months 20%

Figure 14.

FCS Cases Active During May 2019

With Court Involvement by the Number of Months Open

38Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 45: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0 to 3 Months 60%

4 to 7 Months 22%

8 to 11 Months 10%

12+ Months 8%

Figure 15.

FCS Cases Active During May 2019

With No Court Involvement by the Number of Months Open

39Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 46: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 40 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures

Table 9.

Counts of persons are unduplicated.

Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.

Table 11.

Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;

function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;

all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;

services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and family can/will access such resources;

no child under age 18 is still in the home;

Close reason of "Other" includes;

client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;

client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;

referred to other appropriate resource;

other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;

family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;

progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;

Table 12.

All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.

Figure 9.

On March 1, 2017, memorandum CD17-16 was issued and informed staff they will no longer

open FCS functions on families when children are placed in alternative care. When the change

was implemented on March 1, 2017, all FCS cases with associated AC functions opened wereautomatically closed. The closure of the FCS cases associated with AC functions explains the

large decline in the number of FCS cases.

Page 47: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 41 Research and Data Analysis

Figure 13.

Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;

function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;

all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;

services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and

family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;

Close reason of "Other" includes;

client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;

client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;

referred to other appropriate resource;

other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;

family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;

progress no longer being made;

resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;

Figure 14.

All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.

Page 48: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure
Page 49: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Out-of-Home Placement

Page 50: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 14.

Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During May 2019

by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Buchanan 0 4 1 0 1 6 0.29 6.50

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cass 0 3 2 0 0 5 0.19 8.80

Chariton 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.57 15.00

Clay 0 1 5 0 0 6 0.10 9.50

Clinton 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.20 0.00

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Daviess 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.78 10.25

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Grundy 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.81 2.00

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Holt 0 1 0 0 0 1 1.03 16.00

Johnson 0 0 3 0 1 4 0.33 5.75

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Linn 0 1 0 1 0 2 0.63 11.50

Livingston 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.20 3.25

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Nodaway 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.47 4.00

Pettis 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.37 3.25

Platte 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.05 0.00

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ray 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.17 14.00

Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 17 23 1 3 44 0.20 7.05

Northeast Adair 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.40 5.00

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Boone 0 3 5 0 1 9 0.26 3.44

Callaway 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.30 5.67

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cole 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.11 15.00

Franklin 0 3 4 0 1 8 0.32 7.75

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jefferson 0 5 5 0 1 11 0.20 5.73

Knox 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.97 10.00

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lincoln 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.20 13.67

Macon 0 3 0 0 1 4 1.06 11.50

Marion 0 8 2 0 0 10 1.45 2.00

Monroe 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.46 4.33

Montgomery 0 1 7 0 0 8 2.80 10.50

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pike 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.24 9.00

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Randolph 0 2 1 1 0 4 0.68 8.75

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Scotland 0 3 0 0 0 3 2.20 3.33

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Charles 0 4 5 0 0 9 0.10 6.00

Warren 0 6 0 0 0 6 0.74 11.33

* Region Total * 0 40 40 3 4 87 0.28 6.93

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.34 0.00

Butler 0 2 8 1 0 11 1.10 4.09

Cape Girardeau 0 7 8 0 1 16 0.96 5.31

Carter 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.66 0.00

44Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 51: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 14.

Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During May 2019

by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.83 7.20

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dunklin 0 5 3 0 0 8 0.99 7.38

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Madison 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.36 9.75

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pemiscot 0 1 4 0 0 5 0.99 2.00

Perry 0 7 3 0 0 10 2.10 6.80

Phelps 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.31 11.33

Pulaski 0 1 2 1 0 4 0.32 8.25

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Francois 0 3 6 1 0 10 0.69 7.10

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stoddard 0 4 7 0 0 11 1.61 6.09

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Washington 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.49 10.33

Wayne 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.36 1.00

* Region Total * 0 32 56 4 1 93 0.56 6.23

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Barton 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.31 16.00

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Camden 0 4 0 0 0 4 0.48 6.00

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Christian 0 2 2 1 0 5 0.24 6.40

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dallas 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.72 10.67

Douglas 0 0 10 0 1 11 3.59 8.18

Greene 0 14 11 3 1 29 0.50 7.10

Henry 0 0 6 0 0 6 1.21 1.50

Hickory 0 6 0 0 0 6 3.60 3.83

Jasper 0 1 14 1 3 19 0.63 6.37

Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lawrence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

McDonald 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.46 9.00

Miller 0 2 0 0 1 3 0.49 1.67

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Morgan 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.88 5.00

Newton 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.07 3.00

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stone 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.66 10.75

Taney 0 6 1 2 0 9 0.79 6.22

Vernon 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.19 14.00

Webster 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.30 11.33

Wright 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.62 4.67

* Region Total * 0 40 62 7 6 115 0.44 6.69

Kansas City Jackson 0 12 30 15 4 61 0.37 5.00

* Region Total * 0 12 30 15 4 61 0.37 5.00

St. Louis St Louis City 0 4 8 10 2 24 0.36 6.71

St Louis County 0 13 10 4 3 30 0.13 6.90

* Region Total * 0 17 18 14 5 54 0.18 6.81

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

State Total 0 158 229 44 23 454 0.32 6.46

45Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 52: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 15.

Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During May 2019

by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Buchanan 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.10 13.00

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cass 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

De Kalb 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.43 6.00

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Johnson 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.08 15.00

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Linn 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.63 13.00

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pettis 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.09 16.00

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Worth 0 0 1 0 0 1 2.25 10.00

* Region Total * 0 4 2 1 1 8 0.04 12.38

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.20 16.00

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Boone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clark 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.58 0.00

Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Franklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jefferson 0 4 0 0 0 4 0.07 6.50

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lincoln 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.07 17.00

Macon 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.26 12.00

Marion 0 0 3 1 0 4 0.58 11.25

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Charles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 4 5 3 0 12 0.04 9.67

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.69 6.00

Butler 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.10 1.00

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carter 0 2 0 0 0 2 1.32 3.50

46Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 53: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 15.

Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During May 2019

by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dunklin 0 2 3 0 0 5 0.62 8.60

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pemiscot 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.60 3.33

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Phelps 0 0 3 0 1 4 0.41 12.25

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Francois 0 0 4 1 0 5 0.35 10.20

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stoddard 0 3 2 4 0 9 1.32 8.11

Texas 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.17 15.00

Washington 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.16 16.00

Wayne 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.36 15.00

* Region Total * 0 7 17 7 3 34 0.21 8.59

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cedar 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.30 13.00

Christian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Greene 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.05 12.00

Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jasper 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.03 16.00

Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lawrence 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.20 14.00

McDonald 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.15 15.00

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Newton 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.07 12.00

Ozark 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.51 15.00

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Taney 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.09 14.00

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 2 4 4 1 11 0.04 13.55

Kansas City Jackson 0 7 10 1 0 18 0.11 9.33

* Region Total * 0 7 10 1 0 18 0.11 9.33

St. Louis St Louis City 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.01 10.00

St Louis County 0 0 3 2 1 6 0.03 11.50

* Region Total * 0 1 3 2 1 7 0.02 11.29

State Total 0 25 41 18 6 90 0.06 10.03

47Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 54: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 16.

Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody

May 2017 Through April 2019

Total

Month/Year Entries Reentries (Re)Entries

May-2017 471 87 558

Jun-2017 502 99 601

Jul-2017 405 69 474

Aug-2017 544 103 647

Sep-2017 514 105 619

Oct-2017 520 91 611

Nov-2017 465 85 550

Dec-2017 465 81 546

Jan-2018 508 100 608

Feb-2018 453 112 565

Mar-2018 547 115 662

Apr-2018 544 103 647

May-2018 497 103 600

Jun-2018 480 74 554

Jul-2018 404 73 477

Aug-2018 557 118 675

Sep-2018 487 82 569

Oct-2018 490 79 569

Nov-2018 428 77 505

Dec-2018 451 82 533

Jan-2019 497 98 595

Feb-2019 396 92 488

Mar-2019 456 86 542

Apr-2019 626 82 708

Total 11,707 2,196 13,903

48Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 55: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 17.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During May 2019

by Length of Stay and Region

Average

Length of Average

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Northwest 8 16.67% 17 35.42% 23 47.92% 48 24.15 10.38

Northeast 25 27.78% 28 31.11% 37 41.11% 90 22.24 10.76

Southeast 22 29.33% 29 38.67% 24 32.00% 75 21.88 8.80

Southwest 18 27.27% 23 34.85% 25 37.88% 66 26.48 8.98

Kansas City 15 35.71% 13 30.95% 14 33.33% 42 21.69 10.07

St. Louis 17 41.46% 11 26.83% 13 31.71% 41 21.66 9.41

Other 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00

State Total 105 29.01% 121 33.43% 136 37.57% 362 23.06 9.75

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

49Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 56: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 18.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Length of Stay and Case Manager County

Average

Length of Average

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5 14.00 3.60

Buchanan 61 60.40% 26 25.74% 14 13.86% 101 15.76 7.96

Caldwell 7 31.82% 15 68.18% 0 0.00% 22 15.36 6.09

Carroll 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 6.00 8.50

Cass 72 32.29% 56 25.11% 95 42.60% 223 24.75 10.65

Chariton 5 23.81% 1 4.76% 15 71.43% 21 39.57 14.38

Clay 46 31.94% 42 29.17% 56 38.89% 144 22.53 7.36

Clinton 13 26.53% 14 28.57% 22 44.90% 49 25.98 7.39

Cooper 7 36.84% 7 36.84% 5 26.32% 19 21.47 10.16

Daviess 7 46.67% 0 0.00% 8 53.33% 15 32.00 8.33

De Kalb 17 48.57% 12 34.29% 6 17.14% 35 15.00 7.26

Gentry 9 42.86% 7 33.33% 5 23.81% 21 19.76 7.71

Grundy 27 58.70% 7 15.22% 12 26.09% 46 14.35 5.37

Harrison 13 34.21% 14 36.84% 11 28.95% 38 18.42 7.08

Holt 6 35.29% 3 17.65% 8 47.06% 17 19.65 8.82

Johnson 62 53.91% 19 16.52% 34 29.57% 115 18.51 8.06

Lafayette 19 40.43% 14 29.79% 14 29.79% 47 17.77 7.49

Linn 22 30.56% 19 26.39% 31 43.06% 72 25.74 10.26

Livingston 27 42.19% 23 35.94% 14 21.88% 64 20.36 6.77

Mercer 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2 27.00 10.00

Nodaway 21 38.18% 19 34.55% 15 27.27% 55 23.07 8.31

Pettis 38 38.78% 26 26.53% 34 34.69% 98 22.62 8.69

Platte 14 33.33% 17 40.48% 11 26.19% 42 21.93 10.02

Putnam 9 40.91% 5 22.73% 8 36.36% 22 20.95 9.27

Ray 4 33.33% 8 66.67% 0 0.00% 12 13.50 9.75

Saline 10 25.64% 5 12.82% 24 61.54% 39 26.97 7.44

Sullivan 17 47.22% 15 41.67% 4 11.11% 36 15.22 8.61

Worth 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 4 19.25 13.25

* Region Total * 540 39.53% 374 27.38% 452 33.09% 1,366 21.44 8.53

Northeast Adair 47 47.96% 33 33.67% 18 18.37% 98 17.07 7.79

Audrain 14 22.95% 23 37.71% 24 39.34% 61 33.05 9.23

Boone 113 37.29% 88 29.04% 102 33.66% 303 23.92 9.45

Callaway 56 39.72% 52 36.88% 33 23.40% 141 18.16 9.13

Clark 16 38.10% 15 35.71% 11 26.19% 42 22.48 7.79

Cole 79 50.32% 48 30.57% 30 19.11% 157 15.24 9.02

Franklin 96 31.37% 94 30.72% 116 37.91% 306 26.37 8.35

Gasconade 10 40.00% 8 32.00% 7 28.00% 25 16.80 7.92

Howard 17 50.00% 10 29.41% 7 20.59% 34 18.06 10.62

Jefferson 310 46.48% 184 27.59% 173 25.94% 667 17.59 8.11

Knox 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 6.50 10.00

Lewis 15 57.69% 4 15.39% 7 26.92% 26 19.31 9.85

Lincoln 43 32.09% 49 36.57% 42 31.34% 134 19.11 8.56

Macon 30 42.86% 33 47.14% 7 10.00% 70 13.71 7.97

Marion 70 33.49% 61 29.19% 78 37.32% 209 23.76 8.84

Monroe 14 53.85% 9 34.62% 3 11.54% 26 13.31 8.12

Montgomery 11 23.40% 20 42.55% 16 34.04% 47 28.36 9.13

Osage 4 26.67% 5 33.33% 6 40.00% 15 21.73 5.80

Pike 15 40.54% 8 21.62% 14 37.84% 37 23.51 8.68

Ralls 10 47.62% 2 9.52% 9 42.86% 21 25.19 11.14

Randolph 61 54.46% 32 28.57% 19 16.96% 112 15.67 8.80

Schuyler 5 50.00% 2 20.00% 3 30.00% 10 15.80 8.90

Scotland 16 61.54% 6 23.08% 4 15.39% 26 17.27 10.12

Shelby 12 37.50% 8 25.00% 12 37.50% 32 19.19 10.03

St Charles 93 34.96% 71 26.69% 102 38.35% 266 26.73 9.84

Warren 30 42.86% 21 30.00% 19 27.14% 70 17.56 7.73

* Region Total * 1,195 40.61% 886 30.11% 862 29.29% 2,943 20.87 8.74

Southeast Bollinger 24 42.11% 21 36.84% 12 21.05% 57 15.54 7.16

Butler 121 50.63% 49 20.50% 69 28.87% 239 19.11 8.06

Cape Girardeau 106 44.92% 86 36.44% 44 18.64% 236 16.92 8.29

Carter 6 75.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8 12.13 6.75

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

50Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 57: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 18.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Length of Stay and Case Manager County

Average

Length of Average

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Southeast Crawford 44 45.83% 35 36.46% 17 17.71% 96 16.61 8.83

Dent 16 25.00% 18 28.13% 30 46.88% 64 28.11 8.78

Dunklin 63 50.00% 34 26.98% 29 23.02% 126 17.42 8.26

Howell 40 37.38% 46 42.99% 21 19.63% 107 19.31 8.26

Iron 23 54.76% 14 33.33% 5 11.91% 42 13.69 7.45

Madison 21 36.84% 14 24.56% 22 38.60% 57 21.14 10.14

Maries 10 66.67% 1 6.67% 4 26.67% 15 11.13 10.53

Mississippi 27 61.36% 11 25.00% 6 13.64% 44 12.93 8.18

New Madrid 47 33.81% 59 42.45% 33 23.74% 139 18.36 7.68

Oregon 34 57.63% 19 32.20% 6 10.17% 59 16.10 7.92

Pemiscot 48 40.34% 27 22.69% 44 36.98% 119 24.48 9.00

Perry 38 55.07% 27 39.13% 4 5.80% 69 11.75 7.49

Phelps 78 39.80% 69 35.20% 49 25.00% 196 18.12 9.39

Pulaski 66 36.87% 60 33.52% 53 29.61% 179 20.83 8.74

Reynolds 11 36.67% 9 30.00% 10 33.33% 30 23.33 8.43

Ripley 21 37.50% 12 21.43% 23 41.07% 56 29.09 9.11

Scott 59 45.74% 44 34.11% 26 20.16% 129 16.45 8.34

Shannon 9 37.50% 14 58.33% 1 4.17% 24 12.08 6.92

St Francois 116 39.59% 69 23.55% 108 36.86% 293 21.66 8.04

Ste Genevieve 21 32.31% 15 23.08% 29 44.62% 65 23.68 9.92

Stoddard 110 71.90% 21 13.73% 22 14.38% 153 12.52 8.70

Texas 38 46.91% 28 34.57% 15 18.52% 81 14.05 7.80

Washington 70 40.70% 52 30.23% 50 29.07% 172 21.12 8.65

Wayne 29 51.79% 8 14.29% 19 33.93% 56 21.64 10.23

* Region Total * 1,296 44.52% 863 29.65% 752 25.83% 2,911 18.81 8.47

Southwest Barry 79 46.75% 52 30.77% 38 22.49% 169 18.86 8.17

Barton 5 22.73% 2 9.09% 15 68.18% 22 33.68 11.14

Bates 10 37.04% 6 22.22% 11 40.74% 27 23.00 9.63

Benton 8 47.06% 4 23.53% 5 29.41% 17 23.12 11.41

Camden 51 42.15% 32 26.45% 38 31.41% 121 20.94 8.93

Cedar 20 68.97% 4 13.79% 5 17.24% 29 14.79 10.59

Christian 65 45.78% 53 37.32% 24 16.90% 142 15.85 8.68

Dade 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 6 15.00 9.00

Dallas 16 42.11% 8 21.05% 14 36.84% 38 24.74 9.26

Douglas 21 47.73% 12 27.27% 11 25.00% 44 18.41 10.11

Greene 298 48.30% 167 27.07% 152 24.64% 617 21.16 7.89

Henry 28 31.46% 32 35.96% 29 32.58% 89 24.45 8.31

Hickory 10 62.50% 2 12.50% 4 25.00% 16 17.44 3.75

Jasper 211 46.89% 118 26.22% 121 26.89% 450 19.86 9.36

Laclede 43 34.68% 29 23.39% 52 41.94% 124 22.36 8.08

Lawrence 62 41.61% 42 28.19% 45 30.20% 149 22.46 8.86

McDonald 33 45.21% 28 38.36% 12 16.44% 73 14.85 10.88

Miller 17 30.91% 19 34.55% 19 34.55% 55 24.13 9.00

Moniteau 9 75.00% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12 8.17 11.67

Morgan 32 51.61% 11 17.74% 19 30.65% 62 17.40 7.84

Newton 61 53.51% 30 26.32% 23 20.18% 114 18.43 9.21

Ozark 11 47.83% 11 47.83% 1 4.35% 23 13.30 9.26

Polk 16 29.09% 16 29.09% 23 41.82% 55 24.95 10.02

St Clair 10 66.67% 1 6.67% 4 26.67% 15 14.60 12.27

Stone 43 37.72% 35 30.70% 36 31.58% 114 22.95 8.62

Taney 102 39.84% 89 34.77% 65 25.39% 256 19.00 8.22

Vernon 13 43.33% 8 26.67% 9 30.00% 30 25.07 10.40

Webster 24 45.28% 21 39.62% 8 15.09% 53 17.09 9.91

Wright 61 54.96% 33 29.73% 17 15.32% 111 14.39 7.23

* Region Total * 1,363 44.94% 868 28.62% 802 26.44% 3,033 20.08 8.70

Kansas City Jackson 725 40.30% 539 29.96% 535 29.74% 1,799 21.06 8.31

* Region Total * 725 40.30% 539 29.96% 535 29.74% 1,799 21.06 8.31

St. Louis St Louis City 202 30.65% 161 24.43% 296 44.92% 659 30.37 8.79

St Louis County 344 33.76% 328 32.19% 347 34.05% 1,019 23.26 7.90

* Region Total * 546 32.54% 489 29.14% 643 38.32% 1,678 26.05 8.25

Other Icama 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4 18.50 7.50

* Region Total * 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4 18.50 7.50

State Total 5,668 41.27% 4,019 29.26% 4,047 29.47% 13,734 20.97 8.54

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

51Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 58: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 19.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Category

Children

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 0 0 5 0 0 5 4.23 3.60

Buchanan 0 53 34 12 2 101 4.82 7.96

Caldwell 0 8 14 0 0 22 9.15 6.09

Carroll 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.91 8.50

Cass 2 56 96 48 21 223 8.45 10.65

Chariton 0 3 10 7 1 21 11.87 14.38

Clay 0 42 75 20 7 144 2.51 7.36

Clinton 0 14 27 7 1 49 9.62 7.39

Cooper 0 5 9 4 1 19 4.78 10.16

Daviess 0 6 7 0 2 15 6.66 8.33

De Kalb 0 20 14 1 0 35 15.15 7.26

Gentry 0 3 17 0 1 21 12.70 7.71

Grundy 0 8 36 1 1 46 18.65 5.37

Harrison 0 8 25 4 1 38 17.11 7.08

Holt 0 2 14 1 0 17 17.51 8.82

Johnson 0 36 58 14 7 115 9.55 8.06

Lafayette 0 11 26 8 2 47 5.74 7.49

Linn 0 33 26 10 3 72 22.81 10.26

Livingston 0 17 37 10 0 64 19.23 6.77

Mercer 0 0 1 0 1 2 2.08 10.00

Nodaway 0 13 35 4 3 55 12.90 8.31

Pettis 0 37 42 13 6 98 9.09 8.69

Platte 0 14 13 10 5 42 1.91 10.02

Putnam 0 5 12 0 5 22 18.97 9.27

Ray 0 6 5 1 0 12 2.05 9.75

Saline 0 13 23 3 0 39 7.23 7.44

Sullivan 0 7 21 5 3 36 22.15 8.61

Worth 0 2 1 0 1 4 9.01 13.25

* Region Total * 2 424 683 183 74 1,366 6.31 8.53

Northeast Adair 0 21 55 15 7 98 19.71 7.79

Audrain 0 18 29 9 5 61 9.58 9.23

Boone 1 83 153 52 14 303 8.85 9.45

Callaway 0 36 84 16 5 141 14.10 9.13

Clark 0 12 22 7 1 42 24.46 7.79

Cole 0 50 66 30 11 157 8.75 9.02

Franklin 0 108 150 22 26 306 12.19 8.35

Gasconade 0 10 12 2 1 25 7.43 7.92

Howard 0 6 20 6 2 34 15.61 10.62

Jefferson 1 179 423 40 24 667 12.13 8.11

Knox 0 4 3 1 0 8 7.75 10.00

Lewis 0 6 15 3 2 26 10.86 9.85

Lincoln 0 39 80 10 5 134 9.10 8.56

Macon 0 25 26 15 4 70 18.52 7.97

Marion 1 76 97 25 10 209 30.34 8.84

Monroe 0 5 13 8 0 26 12.62 8.12

Montgomery 0 18 20 4 5 47 16.47 9.13

Osage 0 1 13 0 1 15 4.37 5.80

Pike 0 14 17 3 3 37 9.01 8.68

Ralls 0 13 6 2 0 21 8.83 11.14

Randolph 0 39 43 24 6 112 19.05 8.80

Schuyler 0 0 8 1 1 10 8.77 8.90

Scotland 0 4 18 3 1 26 19.09 10.12

Shelby 0 7 15 7 3 32 20.04 10.03

St Charles 2 92 129 25 18 266 2.86 9.84

Warren 0 27 32 8 3 70 8.61 7.73

* Region Total * 5 893 1,549 338 158 2,943 9.33 8.74

Southeast Bollinger 0 9 43 4 1 57 19.54 7.16

Butler 0 62 123 40 14 239 23.97 8.06

Cape Girardeau 2 62 136 23 13 236 14.22 8.29

Carter 0 7 0 1 0 8 5.28 6.75

52Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis Unit

Page 59: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 19.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Category

Children

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 28 48 18 2 96 16.00 8.83

Dent 2 16 28 11 7 64 17.52 8.78

Dunklin 0 38 62 19 7 126 15.59 8.26

Howell 0 40 38 15 14 107 10.63 8.26

Iron 0 9 28 4 1 42 17.48 7.45

Madison 0 9 34 12 2 57 19.45 10.14

Maries 0 2 10 3 0 15 6.96 10.53

Mississippi 0 10 29 5 0 44 13.80 8.18

New Madrid 0 20 99 17 3 139 30.79 7.68

Oregon 0 30 21 6 2 59 24.32 7.92

Pemiscot 0 17 81 13 8 119 23.64 9.00

Perry 0 14 47 7 1 69 14.49 7.49

Phelps 0 72 83 32 9 196 20.02 9.39

Pulaski 0 61 75 38 5 179 14.28 8.74

Reynolds 0 3 22 2 3 30 19.58 8.43

Ripley 0 12 29 7 8 56 16.93 9.11

Scott 0 20 91 15 3 129 13.10 8.34

Shannon 0 16 6 2 0 24 12.18 6.92

St Francois 1 89 150 41 12 293 20.34 8.04

Ste Genevieve 0 17 29 12 7 65 15.40 9.92

Stoddard 0 31 84 32 6 153 22.40 8.70

Texas 0 18 53 9 1 81 14.16 7.80

Washington 0 39 104 22 7 172 28.37 8.65

Wayne 0 26 18 8 4 56 19.96 10.23

* Region Total * 5 777 1,571 418 140 2,911 17.62 8.47

Southwest Barry 0 65 76 20 8 169 19.56 8.17

Barton 0 7 11 3 1 22 6.85 11.14

Bates 0 14 7 0 6 27 6.35 9.63

Benton 0 6 4 4 3 17 4.95 11.41

Camden 0 42 64 13 2 121 14.42 8.93

Cedar 0 11 14 2 2 29 8.77 10.59

Christian 0 38 76 21 7 142 6.70 8.68

Dade 1 1 4 0 0 6 3.36 9.00

Dallas 0 13 16 5 4 38 9.11 9.26

Douglas 0 6 32 1 5 44 14.37 10.11

Greene 0 273 229 73 42 617 10.57 7.89

Henry 0 45 33 4 7 89 17.96 8.31

Hickory 0 12 3 1 0 16 9.61 3.75

Jasper 0 135 208 73 34 450 14.86 9.36

Laclede 0 42 67 12 3 124 13.92 8.08

Lawrence 0 52 60 24 13 149 14.64 8.86

McDonald 0 26 34 9 4 73 11.27 10.88

Miller 0 16 27 10 2 55 8.95 9.00

Moniteau 0 3 7 2 0 12 3.06 11.67

Morgan 0 38 18 4 2 62 13.67 7.84

Newton 0 50 45 11 8 114 7.72 9.21

Ozark 0 8 10 3 2 23 11.80 9.26

Polk 0 24 22 3 6 55 7.17 10.02

St Clair 0 5 6 4 0 15 7.65 12.27

Stone 0 42 58 9 5 114 18.90 8.62

Taney 0 134 84 23 15 256 22.40 8.22

Vernon 0 10 11 5 4 30 5.70 10.40

Webster 0 15 20 15 3 53 5.28 9.91

Wright 0 39 63 7 2 111 22.78 7.23

* Region Total * 1 1,172 1,309 361 190 3,033 11.63 8.70

Kansas City Jackson 12 655 828 161 143 1,799 10.86 8.31

* Region Total * 12 655 828 161 143 1,799 10.86 8.31

St. Louis St Louis City 3 232 269 99 56 659 9.76 8.79

St Louis County 2 383 478 96 60 1,019 4.35 7.90

* Region Total * 5 615 747 195 116 1,678 5.56 8.25

Other Icama 0 2 1 1 0 4 0.00 7.50

* Region Total * 0 2 1 1 0 4 0.00 7.50

State Total 30 4,538 6,688 1,657 821 13,734 9.63 8.54

53Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis Unit

Page 60: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 0

Chariton 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 2 24 11 1 0 0 0

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Boone 1 0 0 19 1 0 0 0 0

Callaway 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0

Franklin 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 1 0 0 23 6 1 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Marion 0 0 1 5 4 0 0 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

St Charles 2 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0

Warren 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 4 0 1 92 24 2 0 0 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

54Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 61: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dent 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0

* Region Total * 2 1 0 10 2 7 2 0 0

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0

Barton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0

Dade 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0

Greene 0 0 0 16 5 2 0 0 0

Henry 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 0 0 16 8 1 0 0 0

Laclede 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0

McDonald 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0

Ozark 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Taney 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 1 86 22 7 0 0 0

Kansas City Jackson 9 0 3 101 21 3 0 0 0

* Region Total * 9 0 3 101 21 3 0 0 0

St. Louis St Louis City 2 0 1 33 8 1 0 0 0

St Louis County 1 0 1 48 3 1 0 0 0

* Region Total * 3 0 2 81 11 2 0 0 0

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 18 1 9 394 91 22 2 0 0

55Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 62: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 8 1 2 38 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 7 0 0 46 2 0 0 0

Chariton 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 2 0 7 32 0 0 0 0

Clinton 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 1 0 1 33 2 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 2 0 0 7 1 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 2 1 29 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 4 0 0 13 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0

Platte 0 1 0 1 12 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 29 4 14 353 6 0 0 0

Northeast Adair 0 3 3 1 13 0 0 0 0

Audrain 0 1 0 0 17 2 0 0 0

Boone 0 5 3 1 55 1 0 0 0

Callaway 0 2 0 0 32 2 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 6 0 1 43 0 0 0 0

Franklin 0 3 0 2 94 5 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 10 8 5 133 4 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 1 0 3 35 2 0 0 0

Macon 0 1 3 0 21 0 0 0 0

Marion 0 4 4 3 60 2 0 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 16 2 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 2 0 1 8 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 1 2 0 33 2 0 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0

St Charles 0 8 0 4 66 5 0 0 0

Warren 0 0 4 2 18 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 52 32 23 694 28 0 0 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 0 0 61 1 0 1 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0 3 6 52 1 0 0 0

Carter 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0

56Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 63: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0

Dent 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 9 2 27 0 0 0 0

Howell 0 1 2 0 37 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 1 8 1 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 2 0 1 17 1 0 0 0

Oregon 0 1 4 0 25 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 1 0 0 15 4 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 2 2 0 66 1 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 6 0 1 54 0 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 1 19 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 3 0 6 80 2 0 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 16 2 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 1 5 24 0 0 0 0

Texas 0 2 0 0 16 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 1 0 1 35 1 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 19 30 25 693 14 0 1 0

Southwest Barry 0 6 0 3 53 0 0 0 0

Barton 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 1 0 1 12 3 0 0 0

Benton 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0

Camden 0 1 0 1 39 0 0 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 5 0 1 28 1 0 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 2 0 1 8 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0

Greene 0 24 0 15 218 9 0 0 0

Henry 0 3 0 1 39 6 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 7 0 14 98 8 0 0 0

Laclede 0 0 0 1 33 1 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 0 0 4 40 1 0 0 0

McDonald 0 3 0 2 20 1 0 0 0

Miller 0 1 0 1 13 1 0 0 1

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 1 0 3 32 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 3 0 1 43 0 0 0 0

Ozark 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 3 0 0 21 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 5 0 3 32 0 0 0 0

Taney 0 12 0 14 96 5 0 0 0

Vernon 0 1 0 0 9 1 0 0 0

Webster 0 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 0

Wright 0 0 0 1 38 0 0 0 1

* Region Total * 0 82 0 71 933 39 0 0 2

Kansas City Jackson 0 38 19 56 441 34 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 38 19 56 441 34 0 0 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 31 4 19 145 9 0 0 0

St Louis County 0 33 12 34 256 9 0 0 2

* Region Total * 0 64 16 53 401 18 0 0 2

Other Icama 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

State Total 0 284 101 243 3,516 139 0 1 4

57Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 64: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 0 0 4 1 3 0 2 0

Chariton 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 2 0 0 0 2 3 1 2 0

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1

Lafayette 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0

Pettis 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

* Region Total * 17 0 0 6 6 21 9 5 1

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0

Boone 1 0 0 1 0 6 4 0 1

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 0

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 0

Franklin 4 1 0 0 3 8 5 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Jefferson 5 2 1 2 1 4 0 1 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 3 0

Marion 4 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 1

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 5 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0

St Charles 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 1

Warren 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

* Region Total * 16 3 3 6 10 41 28 22 3

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Butler 3 0 0 0 2 7 2 2 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 1 4 3 1 0 0

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

58Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 65: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Dent 1 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0

Dunklin 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0

Howell 0 0 0 0 1 9 2 1 3

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Madison 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Phelps 1 0 2 2 1 4 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

Ripley 2 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

Stoddard 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0

Texas 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0

* Region Total * 19 0 2 4 14 59 12 12 4

Southwest Barry 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 5 0 0 0 1 9 9 2 0

Henry 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 3 0 0 2 0 8 3 3 1

Laclede 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0

Lawrence 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 1

McDonald 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0

Miller 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Newton 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0

Taney 1 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 0

Vernon 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0

Wright 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

* Region Total * 15 0 0 9 9 48 23 12 6

Kansas City Jackson 0 4 3 5 2 27 8 8 5

* Region Total * 0 4 3 5 2 27 8 8 5

St. Louis St Louis City 3 0 0 5 4 2 1 1 1

St Louis County 4 1 0 5 3 10 1 3 4

* Region Total * 7 1 0 10 7 12 2 4 5

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 74 8 8 40 48 208 82 63 24

59Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 66: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 11 20 5 1 0 0 5 0

Chariton 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 0

Clay 1 1 14 1 0 0 0 1 2

Clinton 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 1

Cooper 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1

Lafayette 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0

Linn 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 3 0

Livingston 0 0 4 1 0 0 3 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0

Sullivan 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 1 20 116 8 4 0 3 15 4

Northeast Adair 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 3 0

Audrain 1 1 3 0 3 0 0 1 0

Boone 4 2 23 0 17 0 0 1 4

Callaway 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 3

Clark 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 2 0

Cole 3 1 18 2 3 0 0 0 0

Franklin 0 1 16 0 4 0 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 4 20 2 11 0 0 0 5

Knox 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 3 4 0 0 1 0 1 0

Macon 1 3 7 0 0 0 0 1 0

Marion 0 4 18 1 0 1 0 0 1

Monroe 0 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0

Ralls 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 5 10 1 2 0 0 1 0

Schuyler 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

Shelby 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0

St Charles 0 4 11 1 6 0 0 0 1

Warren 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 10 37 179 7 50 2 0 14 14

Southeast Bollinger 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 13 16 5 1 0 0 0 1

Cape Girardeau 0 13 6 0 2 0 0 1 0

Carter 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

60Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 67: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB

Southeast Crawford 0 5 6 0 5 0 0 1 0

Dent 1 5 3 0 1 0 0 1 0

Dunklin 0 10 5 0 2 0 0 1 0

Howell 0 2 6 1 2 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 5 2 1 1 0 0 0 0

Maries 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 5 5 3 2 0 0 1 1

Oregon 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 1

Perry 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 7 16 1 7 1 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 4 20 1 8 0 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 6 7 0 2 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 19 10 2 0 1 0 8 2

Ste Genevieve 0 4 3 0 2 0 0 1 0

Stoddard 0 14 10 0 4 0 0 0 0

Texas 0 1 2 0 4 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 15 6 0 0 0 0 1 0

Wayne 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 1 152 148 20 46 2 0 15 5

Southwest Barry 1 1 9 3 1 0 2 0 0

Barton 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 3 9 0 1 0 0 0 0

Cedar 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 4 9 2 4 0 0 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Greene 0 10 26 11 17 0 1 1 8

Henry 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 10 36 2 17 0 0 2 0

Laclede 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 1

Lawrence 0 5 13 2 0 0 0 0 1

McDonald 0 1 2 0 4 0 0 1 0

Miller 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 0

Moniteau 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ozark 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 2 5 0 2 0 0 0 0

Taney 1 4 8 3 6 0 0 0 1

Vernon 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

Webster 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0

Wright 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 4 56 164 26 61 0 3 6 12

Kansas City Jackson 2 24 56 28 17 5 7 1 7

* Region Total * 2 24 56 28 17 5 7 1 7

St. Louis St Louis City 2 9 46 6 28 0 0 0 8

St Louis County 3 15 44 3 20 0 0 0 6

* Region Total * 5 24 90 9 48 0 0 0 14

Other Icama 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 23 314 753 98 226 9 13 51 56

61Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 68: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 5

Buchanan 0 30 4 0 0 0 0 0 101

Caldwell 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 22

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Cass 1 60 35 6 0 1 4 3 223

Chariton 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 21

Clay 3 47 21 1 0 0 0 0 144

Clinton 0 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 49

Cooper 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 19

Daviess 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 15

De Kalb 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 35

Gentry 0 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 21

Grundy 0 26 10 0 0 0 0 0 46

Harrison 0 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 38

Holt 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 17

Johnson 1 30 25 1 0 0 1 0 115

Lafayette 0 10 15 0 0 0 1 0 47

Linn 0 14 8 0 0 0 0 0 72

Livingston 2 26 9 0 0 0 2 0 64

Mercer 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Nodaway 0 29 6 0 0 0 0 1 55

Pettis 1 31 10 0 0 0 0 0 98

Platte 0 10 3 0 0 0 1 1 42

Putnam 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 22

Ray 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

Saline 5 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 39

Sullivan 1 5 15 0 0 0 1 0 36

Worth 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4

* Region Total * 14 444 204 8 0 1 10 5 1,366

Northeast Adair 1 40 14 2 0 0 2 0 98

Audrain 0 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 61

Boone 3 98 47 0 0 0 4 1 303

Callaway 2 52 27 1 0 0 0 0 141

Clark 0 14 8 0 0 0 0 0 42

Cole 3 44 19 0 0 0 1 1 157

Franklin 3 102 40 2 0 0 1 0 306

Gasconade 1 8 3 0 0 0 0 1 25

Howard 0 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 34

Jefferson 5 253 152 6 0 0 2 0 667

Knox 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 8

Lewis 0 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 26

Lincoln 1 54 25 0 0 0 1 1 134

Macon 0 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 70

Marion 5 68 17 0 0 0 0 0 209

Monroe 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 26

Montgomery 0 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 47

Osage 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 15

Pike 0 10 7 0 0 0 0 0 37

Ralls 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 21

Randolph 0 26 17 0 0 0 0 0 112

Schuyler 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 10

Scotland 0 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 26

Shelby 0 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 32

St Charles 3 82 41 1 0 0 2 2 266

Warren 1 25 6 1 0 0 1 0 70

* Region Total * 29 1,015 469 13 0 0 14 6 2,943

Southeast Bollinger 0 34 9 0 0 0 0 0 57

Butler 1 69 48 0 0 0 3 1 239

Cape Girardeau 1 90 45 2 0 0 1 1 236

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

62Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 69: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL

Southeast Crawford 0 28 20 0 0 0 1 0 96

Dent 1 23 3 0 0 0 0 1 64

Dunklin 1 36 23 0 0 0 1 2 126

Howell 0 20 18 0 0 0 0 2 107

Iron 1 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 42

Madison 0 19 10 1 0 0 2 0 57

Maries 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 15

Mississippi 0 19 10 0 0 0 0 0 44

New Madrid 2 66 30 0 0 0 1 0 139

Oregon 0 6 15 0 0 0 2 0 59

Pemiscot 0 59 21 0 0 0 0 0 119

Perry 1 31 15 0 0 0 0 0 69

Phelps 0 52 28 0 0 1 0 0 196

Pulaski 0 57 18 1 0 0 2 0 179

Reynolds 1 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 30

Ripley 0 25 2 0 0 0 0 1 56

Scott 0 61 30 0 0 2 0 0 129

Shannon 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 24

St Francois 3 80 61 3 0 0 1 1 293

Ste Genevieve 0 16 13 3 0 0 1 1 65

Stoddard 0 35 49 0 0 3 1 0 153

Texas 0 44 8 0 0 0 1 0 81

Washington 1 68 35 0 0 1 0 0 172

Wayne 0 9 9 1 0 0 1 0 56

* Region Total * 13 993 538 11 0 7 18 10 2,911

Southwest Barry 1 50 24 1 0 1 1 2 169

Barton 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 22

Bates 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 1 27

Benton 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 17

Camden 2 53 9 0 0 0 0 0 121

Cedar 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 29

Christian 1 66 9 1 0 0 2 0 142

Dade 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

Dallas 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 38

Douglas 2 15 14 1 0 0 0 0 44

Greene 7 157 52 0 0 0 5 7 617

Henry 0 22 11 0 0 0 1 0 89

Hickory 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 16

Jasper 2 133 70 0 0 0 2 4 450

Laclede 1 60 4 1 0 0 0 0 124

Lawrence 0 44 15 0 0 0 3 2 149

McDonald 0 22 12 0 0 0 0 1 73

Miller 0 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 55

Moniteau 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

Morgan 0 7 11 0 0 0 0 0 62

Newton 0 35 10 0 0 0 0 2 114

Ozark 0 7 3 1 0 0 1 0 23

Polk 1 14 7 2 0 0 1 1 55

St Clair 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 15

Stone 2 39 17 0 0 0 0 0 114

Taney 1 66 15 0 0 1 1 1 256

Vernon 0 8 2 0 0 0 1 0 30

Webster 0 14 6 1 0 0 5 0 53

Wright 3 35 24 1 0 0 0 0 111

* Region Total * 24 907 349 9 0 3 23 21 3,033

Kansas City Jackson 9 385 420 33 0 0 8 10 1,799

* Region Total * 9 385 420 33 0 0 8 10 1,799

St. Louis St Louis City 6 148 104 10 0 0 6 16 659

St Louis County 16 301 148 12 0 0 4 16 1,019

* Region Total * 22 449 252 22 0 0 10 32 1,678

Other Icama 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4

* Region Total * 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4

State Total 111 4,193 2,233 96 0 11 83 84 13,734

63Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 70: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 21.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total

Home Home Home Care Other Exits

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 2 4 0 1 7

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 3 5 1 0 9

Clinton 0 1 0 0 0 1

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 3 0 0 3

Harrison 0 0 1 0 0 1

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 4 1 1 1 7

Lafayette 0 3 0 0 0 3

Linn 0 1 0 1 0 2

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 2 0 0 2

Nodaway 0 0 2 0 1 3

Pettis 0 0 5 1 0 6

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 2 0 0 2

Saline 0 0 2 0 0 2

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 14 27 4 3 48

Northeast Adair 0 0 2 1 0 3

Audrain 0 0 2 0 0 2

Boone 0 2 5 0 0 7

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 2 1 0 0 3

Franklin 0 0 6 0 1 7

Gasconade 0 0 0 1 0 1

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 7 16 1 0 24

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 1 3 0 0 4

Macon 0 0 3 2 1 6

Marion 0 0 0 0 1 1

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 1 8 0 0 9

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 1 0 0 0 1

Randolph 0 1 0 0 0 1

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 4 2 1 7

Shelby 0 1 0 0 0 1

St Charles 0 2 2 1 1 6

Warren 0 7 0 0 0 7

* Region Total * 0 25 52 8 5 90

Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 0 0 1

Butler 0 0 1 2 0 3

Cape Girardeau 0 4 2 0 0 6

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0

64Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 71: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 21.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During May 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total

Home Home Home Care Other Exits

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 1 0 1

Dent 0 0 0 1 0 1

Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howell 0 4 0 1 0 5

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 1 0 0 1

Maries 0 0 4 0 0 4

Mississippi 0 0 1 0 0 1

New Madrid 0 0 1 0 0 1

Oregon 0 1 0 0 0 1

Pemiscot 0 0 1 0 2 3

Perry 0 0 2 0 0 2

Phelps 0 0 3 0 0 3

Pulaski 0 0 5 1 0 6

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 3 7 1 0 11

Scott 0 3 9 0 1 13

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 1 0 1 0 2

Ste Genevieve 0 0 1 0 1 2

Stoddard 0 3 1 4 0 8

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 20 39 12 4 75

Southwest Barry 0 1 1 0 0 2

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 0 2 2

Camden 0 3 0 0 0 3

Cedar 0 0 1 0 0 1

Christian 0 2 8 0 1 11

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 1 2 1 0 4

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 2 7 3 0 2 14

Henry 0 1 0 1 0 2

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 6 4 0 0 10

Laclede 0 0 2 0 0 2

Lawrence 0 1 1 1 2 5

McDonald 0 1 0 0 0 1

Miller 0 0 2 0 0 2

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 0 0 0 1 1

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 1 0 0 1

Taney 0 3 0 0 1 4

Vernon 0 1 0 0 0 1

Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 2 27 25 3 9 66

Kansas City Jackson 1 19 12 4 6 42

* Region Total * 1 19 12 4 6 42

St. Louis St Louis City 0 1 6 6 3 16

St Louis County 0 8 14 1 2 25

* Region Total * 0 9 20 7 5 41

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 3 114 175 38 32 362

65Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 72: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 22.

Children Closed from Alternative Care During May 2019

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing

Returned Other Living with Achieved Total

Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 15 15

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 4 0 0 0 3 7

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 4 0 0 1 2 7

Clinton 0 0 0 1 0 1

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 3 0 0 0 0 3

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 2 0 1 2 3 8

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 1 1 2

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 2 0 0 0 0 2

Nodaway 1 0 0 1 2 4

Pettis 2 0 0 1 0 3

Platte 0 0 0 0 1 1

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 0 1 1

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 18 0 1 7 28 54

Northeast Adair 3 0 0 0 0 3

Audrain 1 0 0 0 0 1

Boone 4 0 0 0 1 5

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 2 0 0 1 1 4

Franklin 0 0 0 0 4 4

Gasconade 1 0 0 0 0 1

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 7 0 0 5 4 16

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 1 0 0 0 0 1

Macon 5 0 0 0 1 6

Marion 0 0 0 1 0 1

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 8 1 0 0 0 9

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 1 0 1

Randolph 0 0 0 0 1 1

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 5 2 2 0 0 9

Shelby 1 0 0 0 0 1

St Charles 5 0 0 1 1 7

Warren 6 0 0 0 0 6

* Region Total * 49 3 2 9 13 76

Southeast Bollinger 1 0 0 0 0 1

Butler 5 0 0 0 0 5

Cape Girardeau 6 0 0 0 0 6

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crawford 0 0 0 1 0 1

66Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 73: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 22.

Children Closed from Alternative Care During May 2019

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing

Returned Other Living with Achieved Total

Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings

Southeast Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 0 1 1

Howell 5 0 0 0 0 5

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 0 1 1

Maries 4 0 0 0 0 4

Mississippi 1 0 0 0 0 1

New Madrid 0 0 1 0 0 1

Oregon 0 0 0 1 0 1

Pemiscot 1 0 0 1 4 6

Perry 1 0 0 0 0 1

Phelps 1 0 0 0 0 1

Pulaski 1 0 0 0 0 1

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 11 0 0 0 0 11

Scott 10 0 0 1 0 11

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 0 0 0 1 1

Ste Genevieve 0 0 1 1 0 2

Stoddard 2 0 0 1 4 7

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 1 1

* Region Total * 49 0 2 6 12 69

Southwest Barry 1 0 0 0 0 1

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 2 0 2

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 1

Christian 6 0 0 1 2 9

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 2 0 0 1 1 4

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 2 0 0 2 22 26

Henry 1 0 0 0 0 1

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 5 0 0 0 0 5

Laclede 0 0 0 0 2 2

Lawrence 1 0 0 2 0 3

McDonald 0 0 0 1 2 3

Miller 2 0 0 0 0 2

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 0 0 1 7 8

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 1 0 0 0 0 1

Taney 2 0 0 1 0 3

Vernon 1 0 0 0 0 1

Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wright 0 0 0 0 2 2

* Region Total * 24 0 0 11 39 74

Kansas City Jackson 23 0 0 4 7 34

* Region Total * 23 0 0 4 7 34

St. Louis St Louis City 9 0 0 1 20 30

St Louis County 12 0 0 4 25 41

* Region Total * 21 0 0 5 45 71

Other Icama 0 0 0 1 8 9

* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 8 9

State Total 184 3 5 43 152 387

67Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 74: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 23.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of May 2019

With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody

Temporary Adoptions No Identified

Legal Status 1 Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive

TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 11 8 2 0 21 8

Caldwell 7 0 0 0 7 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 15 7 0 0 22 19

Chariton 3 1 0 0 4 1

Clay 13 7 0 1 21 16

Clinton 15 1 0 0 16 4

Cooper 3 0 0 0 3 2

Daviess 1 3 0 0 4 1

De Kalb 9 0 0 0 9 1

Gentry 3 0 0 0 3 3

Grundy 1 1 0 0 2 1

Harrison 4 3 0 0 7 1

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 3 1 0 0 4 4

Lafayette 9 0 0 3 12 2

Linn 20 5 1 0 26 19

Livingston 4 0 0 0 4 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 1 1 0 0 2 2

Pettis 13 0 1 0 14 6

Platte 6 2 0 0 8 6

Putnam 1 0 0 0 1 0

Ray 1 0 0 0 1 1

Saline 13 5 0 2 20 10

Sullivan 9 1 0 0 10 4

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 165 46 4 6 221 111

Northeast Adair 10 3 0 0 13 6

Audrain 17 2 0 0 19 9

Boone 38 12 2 0 52 22

Callaway 27 1 0 0 28 14

Clark 5 1 0 0 6 2

Cole 25 3 0 2 30 12

Franklin 44 19 1 0 64 32

Gasconade 4 2 0 0 6 3

Howard 2 0 0 0 2 2

Jefferson 68 24 0 3 95 56

Knox 1 0 0 0 1 1

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 21 8 0 3 32 3

Macon 5 0 0 0 5 4

Marion 15 10 0 0 25 14

Monroe 2 0 0 0 2 2

Montgomery 16 0 0 0 16 10

Osage 3 0 0 0 3 2

Pike 4 6 0 0 10 2

Ralls 3 1 0 0 4 3

Randolph 14 0 3 0 17 8

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 1 0 0 0 1 1

St Charles 66 19 0 0 85 56

Warren 21 0 0 1 22 4

* Region Total * 412 111 6 9 538 268

Southeast Bollinger 2 0 0 0 2 1

Butler 57 14 0 0 71 42

Cape Girardeau 10 13 0 0 23 9

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crawford 11 8 0 3 22 14

Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 68

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 75: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 23.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of May 2019

With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody

Temporary Adoptions No Identified

In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive

TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource

Southeast Dent 3 14 0 0 17 9

Dunklin 23 0 0 0 23 16

Howell 6 0 1 0 7 5

Iron 3 2 0 0 5 4

Madison 5 4 0 0 9 7

Maries 0 2 0 0 2 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 7 4 0 0 11 6

Oregon 1 1 0 0 2 1

Pemiscot 10 3 1 0 14 6

Perry 5 1 0 1 7 6

Phelps 14 3 0 0 17 6

Pulaski 38 3 2 0 43 23

Reynolds 6 0 0 0 6 4

Ripley 11 1 0 0 12 8

Scott 1 0 0 0 1 0

Shannon 3 0 0 0 3 2

St Francois 23 26 0 0 49 27

Ste Genevieve 9 3 0 0 12 7

Stoddard 1 1 1 1 4 2

Texas 11 0 0 0 11 7

Washington 7 11 0 0 18 12

Wayne 12 5 0 0 17 12

* Region Total * 279 119 5 5 408 236

Southwest Barry 30 9 0 0 39 14

Barton 5 1 0 0 6 6

Bates 4 0 0 0 4 1

Benton 5 1 0 0 6 5

Camden 11 3 0 0 14 7

Cedar 4 0 0 0 4 1

Christian 19 7 0 0 26 13

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 5 2 0 0 7 1

Douglas 11 1 0 0 12 1

Greene 121 87 1 10 219 85

Henry 11 5 0 1 17 6

Hickory 7 1 0 0 8 5

Jasper 67 10 13 2 92 50

Laclede 18 2 2 1 23 10

Lawrence 34 9 0 1 44 21

McDonald 9 2 0 0 11 4

Miller 3 0 0 0 3 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 5 1 0 0 6 0

Newton 9 13 0 0 22 6

Ozark 1 0 0 0 1 0

Polk 7 0 1 0 8 0

St Clair 1 0 0 0 1 1

Stone 24 8 0 0 32 14

Taney 45 19 1 1 66 27

Vernon 1 1 0 0 2 0

Webster 5 3 0 0 8 2

Wright 16 5 0 0 21 2

* Region Total * 478 190 18 16 702 282

Kansas City Jackson 309 180 1 11 501 313

* Region Total * 309 180 1 11 501 313

St. Louis St Louis City 104 22 1 1 128 83

St Louis County 173 42 0 4 219 154

* Region Total * 277 64 1 5 347 237

Other Icama 0 0 33 0 33 0

* Region Total * 0 0 33 0 33 0

State Total 1,920 710 68 52 2,750 1,447

Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 69

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 76: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 24.

Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of May 2019

by Vendor Type and County

Large Current Licensed

Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors

Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage

Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change

Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 15 1 0 9 14 10 40.00%

Atchison 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 -50.00%

Buchanan 5 0 0 46 22 3 40 57 41 39.02%

Caldwell 0 0 0 2 8 0 9 10 10 0.00%

Carroll 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 2 2 0.00%

Cass 4 0 0 52 30 4 48 74 78 -5.13%

Chariton 0 0 0 1 6 0 6 6 12 -50.00%

Clay 3 0 0 101 62 7 104 149 141 5.67%

Clinton 1 0 0 14 7 0 13 19 21 -9.52%

Cooper 0 0 0 3 5 0 6 6 4 50.00%

Daviess 0 0 0 1 8 0 7 9 10 -10.00%

De Kalb 1 0 0 6 4 1 9 10 8 25.00%

Gentry 0 0 0 1 10 0 7 9 10 -10.00%

Grundy 0 0 0 3 6 0 8 9 12 -25.00%

Harrison 0 0 0 2 10 0 9 12 10 20.00%

Holt 0 0 0 2 7 0 6 7 9 -22.22%

Johnson 1 0 0 26 23 2 32 42 47 -10.64%

Lafayette 1 0 0 13 17 0 15 24 18 33.33%

Linn 1 0 0 7 14 1 16 16 17 -5.88%

Livingston 0 0 0 9 12 0 9 17 14 21.43%

Mercer 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 3 0.00%

Nodaway 1 0 0 11 20 0 22 29 23 26.09%

Pettis 2 0 0 18 25 2 30 36 32 12.50%

Platte 1 0 0 25 15 2 24 37 41 -9.76%

Putnam 0 0 0 5 3 0 7 8 11 -27.27%

Ray 0 0 0 5 2 0 5 7 12 -41.67%

Saline 1 0 0 5 12 0 8 14 15 -6.67%

Sullivan 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 2 7 -71.43%

Worth 1 0 0 2 2 0 3 3 7 -57.14%

* Region Total * 24 0 0 379 337 22 459 632 627 0.80%

Northeast Adair 4 0 0 19 20 0 27 36 32 12.50%

Audrain 0 0 0 15 20 1 18 33 35 -5.71%

Boone 6 0 0 44 37 3 50 75 60 25.00%

Callaway 0 0 0 13 36 1 31 47 45 4.44%

Clark 0 0 0 3 8 0 9 11 14 -21.43%

Cole 1 0 0 38 17 3 31 48 42 14.29%

Franklin 3 0 0 57 62 5 94 117 106 10.38%

Gasconade 0 0 0 6 12 1 16 18 9 100.00%

Howard 1 0 0 4 8 0 6 11 9 22.22%

Jefferson 3 0 0 49 98 3 117 145 150 -3.33%

Knox 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 -50.00%

Lewis 0 0 0 3 8 0 10 11 13 -15.39%

Lincoln 1 1 0 36 29 2 47 59 51 15.69%

Macon 0 0 0 14 19 6 22 33 19 73.68%

Marion 3 0 0 28 38 0 46 62 47 31.92%

Monroe 1 0 0 14 6 0 14 18 20 -10.00%

Montgomery 0 0 0 9 12 1 15 21 16 31.25%

Osage 0 0 0 4 3 0 5 7 6 16.67%

Pike 0 0 0 7 11 0 12 18 23 -21.74%

Ralls 0 0 0 12 17 2 23 28 14 100.00%

Randolph 4 0 0 16 25 3 29 40 36 11.11%

Schuyler 0 0 0 1 9 1 8 9 6 50.00%

Scotland 0 0 0 3 10 0 10 10 7 42.86%

Shelby 0 0 0 5 7 3 7 11 6 83.33%

St Charles 13 1 0 89 70 3 100 144 155 -7.10%

Warren 0 0 0 19 21 1 17 38 37 2.70%

* Region Total * 40 2 0 509 603 39 765 1,051 960 9.48%

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 2 17 3 17 19 18 5.56%

Butler 1 0 0 36 56 1 63 87 71 22.54%

Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 48 45 3 74 93 103 -9.71%

Carter 0 0 0 5 4 0 8 9 13 -30.77%

70Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 77: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 24.

Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of May 2019

by Vendor Type and County

Large Current Licensed

Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors

Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage

Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 12 19 1 23 31 25 24.00%

Dent 0 1 0 9 15 2 17 22 20 10.00%

Dunklin 0 0 0 21 23 1 38 43 34 26.47%

Howell 0 0 0 24 31 4 35 52 41 26.83%

Iron 0 0 0 8 17 1 15 23 15 53.33%

Madison 0 0 0 5 16 0 17 21 24 -12.50%

Maries 0 0 0 4 5 0 7 9 9 0.00%

Mississippi 0 0 0 6 13 0 16 19 21 -9.52%

New Madrid 1 0 0 8 39 3 40 45 52 -13.46%

Oregon 0 0 0 6 3 0 7 8 11 -27.27%

Pemiscot 1 0 0 15 28 2 33 42 46 -8.70%

Perry 0 0 0 9 18 1 23 26 26 0.00%

Phelps 4 0 0 29 21 0 35 50 59 -15.25%

Pulaski 0 0 0 20 24 1 37 42 43 -2.33%

Reynolds 0 1 0 4 7 0 7 12 8 50.00%

Ripley 0 0 0 14 24 0 24 33 27 22.22%

Scott 0 1 0 20 44 1 43 62 49 26.53%

Shannon 1 0 0 7 3 0 9 10 9 11.11%

St Francois 0 1 0 38 56 1 77 90 82 9.76%

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 6 10 0 12 16 20 -20.00%

Stoddard 0 0 0 18 21 1 24 36 41 -12.20%

Texas 0 0 0 12 20 2 27 30 27 11.11%

Washington 0 0 0 10 27 1 30 35 28 25.00%

Wayne 0 0 0 5 16 0 14 21 18 16.67%

* Region Total * 9 4 0 401 622 29 772 986 940 4.89%

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 16 24 3 31 39 35 11.43%

Barton 0 0 0 17 9 0 17 24 23 4.35%

Bates 0 0 0 19 8 1 15 25 26 -3.85%

Benton 2 0 0 10 5 0 8 15 13 15.39%

Camden 0 0 0 11 23 1 28 31 28 10.71%

Cedar 0 0 0 8 7 1 6 15 13 15.39%

Christian 10 0 0 82 42 4 86 117 113 3.54%

Dade 1 0 0 4 3 0 5 6 6 0.00%

Dallas 0 0 0 9 7 1 7 14 23 -39.13%

Douglas 0 0 0 16 9 1 17 24 19 26.32%

Greene 12 0 0 231 94 6 170 278 284 -2.11%

Henry 1 0 0 26 13 1 29 37 42 -11.91%

Hickory 0 0 0 2 7 0 6 9 11 -18.18%

Jasper 11 0 0 88 84 13 129 153 138 10.87%

Laclede 3 0 0 34 19 0 37 45 64 -29.69%

Lawrence 2 0 0 34 34 1 47 59 62 -4.84%

McDonald 2 0 0 17 17 0 22 32 31 3.23%

Miller 1 0 0 10 14 2 15 23 19 21.05%

Moniteau 1 0 0 9 5 1 8 14 17 -17.65%

Morgan 0 0 0 7 15 0 12 21 19 10.53%

Newton 3 0 0 44 28 2 51 68 74 -8.11%

Ozark 0 0 0 1 7 0 5 7 3 133.33%

Polk 5 0 0 30 21 1 30 47 41 14.63%

St Clair 1 0 0 7 3 0 7 10 6 66.67%

Stone 4 0 0 24 19 2 26 37 29 27.59%

Taney 8 0 0 66 36 0 67 95 72 31.94%

Vernon 0 0 0 13 6 0 14 19 23 -17.39%

Webster 1 0 0 31 14 1 20 41 41 0.00%

Wright 1 0 0 17 23 1 29 38 38 0.00%

* Region Total * 69 0 0 883 596 43 944 1,343 1,313 2.29%

Kansas City Jackson 50 0 0 376 253 17 397 542 533 1.69%

* Region Total * 50 0 0 376 253 17 397 542 533 1.69%

St. Louis St Louis City 12 0 0 71 81 7 97 141 150 -6.00%

St Louis County 40 0 0 194 261 12 266 413 402 2.74%

* Region Total * 52 0 0 265 342 19 363 554 552 0.36%

State Total 244 6 0 2,813 2,753 169 3,700 5,108 4,925 3.72%

71Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 78: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 25.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Legal Status

Total

LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Atchison 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 15

Buchanan 101 2 0 3 121 0 0 71 0 298

Caldwell 22 0 0 0 160 0 0 83 0 265

Carroll 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Cass 223 0 0 2 285 1 1 71 0 583

Chariton 21 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 22

Clay 144 0 0 16 472 0 0 117 0 749

Clinton 49 0 0 0 6 0 0 15 0 70

Cooper 19 0 0 0 24 0 0 11 0 54

Daviess 15 0 0 0 12 0 0 4 0 31

De Kalb 35 0 0 0 131 0 0 59 0 225

Gentry 21 0 0 0 6 0 0 10 0 37

Grundy 46 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 50

Harrison 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 39

Holt 17 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 23

Johnson 115 0 0 6 125 1 0 60 0 307

Lafayette 47 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 52

Linn 72 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 74

Livingston 64 0 0 0 8 0 0 10 0 82

Mercer 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Nodaway 55 0 0 3 48 0 0 25 0 131

Pettis 98 1 0 0 126 0 0 57 0 282

Platte 42 0 0 4 151 0 0 25 0 222

Putnam 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22

Ray 12 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 18

Saline 39 0 0 2 154 0 3 39 0 237

Sullivan 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 37

Worth 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 11 0 17

* Region Total * 1,366 4 0 39 1,855 2 4 677 0 3,947

Northeast Adair 98 0 0 0 74 0 0 53 0 225

Audrain 61 0 0 1 69 1 0 46 0 178

Boone 303 2 0 0 371 0 0 263 0 939

Callaway 141 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 0 154

Clark 42 0 0 1 7 0 0 17 0 67

Cole 157 0 0 38 193 0 0 113 0 501

Franklin 306 1 0 3 375 0 0 143 0 828

Gasconade 25 0 0 0 16 0 0 6 0 47

Howard 34 0 0 0 27 0 0 23 0 84

Jefferson 667 0 0 5 553 2 1 519 0 1,747

Knox 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

Lewis 26 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 30

Lincoln 134 0 0 0 134 3 0 89 0 360

Macon 70 0 0 0 44 0 0 38 0 152

Marion 209 0 0 3 101 1 0 57 0 371

Monroe 26 0 0 0 15 0 0 10 0 51

Montgomery 47 0 0 0 21 0 0 22 0 90

Osage 15 0 0 0 4 0 0 7 0 26

Pike 37 0 0 0 22 0 0 13 0 72

Ralls 21 0 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 33

Randolph 112 3 0 1 88 0 0 89 0 293

Schuyler 10 0 0 0 9 0 0 4 0 23

Scotland 26 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 42

Shelby 32 0 0 0 26 0 0 4 0 62

St Charles 266 0 0 3 448 2 0 178 0 897

Warren 70 0 0 0 86 0 0 43 0 199

* Region Total * 2,943 6 0 55 2,705 10 1 1,759 0 7,479

Southeast Bollinger 57 0 0 0 20 0 1 16 0 94

Butler 239 0 0 0 8 1 0 2 0 250

Cape Girardeau 236 0 0 4 153 1 1 201 0 596

Carter 8 0 0 0 13 0 0 5 0 26

Crawford 96 0 0 0 23 0 0 14 0 133

72Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 79: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 25.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Legal Status

Total

LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children

Southeast Dent 64 0 0 0 8 0 0 3 0 75

Dunklin 126 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 0 139

Howell 107 1 0 2 49 0 0 32 0 191

Iron 42 0 0 0 85 0 0 57 0 184

Madison 57 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 0 65

Maries 15 0 0 0 15 0 1 19 0 50

Mississippi 44 0 0 0 10 0 0 47 0 101

New Madrid 139 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 150

Oregon 59 0 0 0 28 0 0 11 0 98

Pemiscot 119 1 0 1 88 0 0 136 0 345

Perry 69 0 0 0 37 0 0 10 0 116

Phelps 196 0 0 0 80 0 2 80 0 358

Pulaski 179 2 0 0 263 0 0 121 0 565

Reynolds 30 0 0 0 13 0 0 5 0 48

Ripley 56 0 0 0 258 1 0 180 0 495

Scott 129 0 0 0 78 0 1 178 0 386

Shannon 24 0 0 0 28 0 0 11 0 63

St Francois 293 0 0 1 444 0 1 141 0 880

Ste Genevieve 65 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 67

Stoddard 153 1 0 0 240 0 1 259 0 654

Texas 81 0 0 0 54 0 0 26 0 161

Washington 172 0 0 1 9 0 1 2 0 185

Wayne 56 0 0 0 144 1 0 75 0 276

* Region Total * 2,911 5 0 11 2,161 4 9 1,650 0 6,751

Southwest Barry 169 0 0 1 3 1 0 2 0 176

Barton 22 0 0 2 78 0 0 13 0 115

Bates 27 0 0 5 13 0 0 9 0 54

Benton 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 18

Camden 121 0 0 1 47 0 0 15 0 184

Cedar 29 0 0 0 41 0 0 5 0 75

Christian 142 0 0 4 351 0 0 55 0 552

Dade 6 0 0 2 24 0 0 4 0 36

Dallas 38 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 41

Douglas 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44

Greene 617 1 0 20 1,254 2 7 179 0 2,080

Henry 89 0 0 1 139 1 0 68 0 298

Hickory 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16

Jasper 450 13 0 1 731 2 5 151 0 1,353

Laclede 124 2 0 0 376 1 0 89 0 592

Lawrence 149 0 0 0 470 1 0 116 0 736

McDonald 73 0 0 1 94 0 0 24 0 192

Miller 55 0 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 69

Moniteau 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

Morgan 62 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 66

Newton 114 0 0 6 345 0 0 75 0 540

Ozark 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23

Polk 55 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 61

St Clair 15 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 22

Stone 114 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 116

Taney 256 1 0 0 192 3 0 97 0 549

Vernon 30 0 0 0 32 1 0 6 0 69

Webster 53 0 0 3 423 0 0 134 0 613

Wright 111 0 0 0 131 1 0 95 0 338

* Region Total * 3,033 18 0 50 4,767 13 12 1,147 0 9,040

Kansas City Jackson 1,799 1 2 49 2,617 29 8 478 0 4,983

* Region Total * 1,799 1 2 49 2,617 29 8 478 0 4,983

St. Louis St Louis City 659 1 0 7 981 10 0 503 0 2,161

St Louis County 1,019 0 0 38 1,176 5 10 583 0 2,831

* Region Total * 1,678 1 0 45 2,157 15 10 1,086 0 4,992

Other Icama 4 33 0 32 2,044 0 0 32 0 2,145

* Region Total * 4 33 0 32 2,044 0 0 32 0 2,145

State Total 13,734 68 2 281 18,306 73 44 6,829 0 39,337

73Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 80: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 26.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Goal

Total

01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

Buchanan 62 19 0 4 5 7 4 101

Caldwell 13 7 0 0 2 0 0 22

Carroll 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Cass 168 22 0 17 10 1 5 223

Chariton 5 4 0 6 6 0 0 21

Clay 87 20 0 9 28 0 0 144

Clinton 24 16 0 3 5 0 1 49

Cooper 11 3 0 3 2 0 0 19

Daviess 3 4 0 2 2 0 4 15

De Kalb 23 9 0 1 2 0 0 35

Gentry 13 3 0 1 4 0 0 21

Grundy 40 2 0 1 3 0 0 46

Harrison 30 7 0 0 1 0 0 38

Holt 9 0 0 0 8 0 0 17

Johnson 95 4 0 5 5 0 6 115

Lafayette 35 9 0 2 1 0 0 47

Linn 29 25 0 7 7 0 4 72

Livingston 47 4 0 4 9 0 0 64

Mercer 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2

Nodaway 36 2 0 4 12 0 1 55

Pettis 47 13 0 3 29 1 5 98

Platte 24 8 0 9 1 0 0 42

Putnam 16 1 0 0 5 0 0 22

Ray 5 1 0 0 5 0 1 12

Saline 19 18 0 0 2 0 0 39

Sullivan 24 10 0 1 1 0 0 36

Worth 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 4

* Region Total * 875 211 0 83 156 9 32 1,366

Northeast Adair 66 13 0 5 11 1 2 98

Audrain 24 19 0 7 11 0 0 61

Boone 188 50 0 23 28 5 9 303

Callaway 88 28 0 7 17 0 1 141

Clark 32 6 0 1 1 1 1 42

Cole 101 28 0 9 13 1 5 157

Franklin 172 63 0 29 35 3 4 306

Gasconade 18 6 0 1 0 0 0 25

Howard 27 2 0 2 1 1 1 34

Jefferson 399 92 0 47 112 8 9 667

Knox 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 8

Lewis 22 0 0 4 0 0 0 26

Lincoln 68 29 0 17 17 1 2 134

Macon 62 5 0 1 1 0 1 70

Marion 127 25 0 16 28 1 12 209

Monroe 18 2 0 3 3 0 0 26

Montgomery 20 16 0 7 4 0 0 47

Osage 11 3 0 0 1 0 0 15

Pike 17 10 0 3 3 0 4 37

Ralls 12 4 0 3 2 0 0 21

Randolph 68 14 0 5 20 2 3 112

Schuyler 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 10

Scotland 20 0 0 2 4 0 0 26

Shelby 25 1 0 3 3 0 0 32

St Charles 117 85 0 35 19 3 7 266

Warren 31 21 0 6 12 0 0 70

* Region Total * 1,747 523 0 236 349 27 61 2,943

Southeast Bollinger 50 2 0 1 3 0 1 57

Butler 102 71 0 24 27 7 8 239

Cape Girardeau 179 23 0 15 12 0 7 236

Carter 4 0 0 1 0 0 3 8

74Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 81: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 26.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and Goal

Total

01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children

Southeast Crawford 60 19 0 3 11 2 1 96

Dent 31 17 0 12 1 3 0 64

Dunklin 71 23 0 7 13 0 12 126

Howell 69 6 0 10 6 6 10 107

Iron 26 5 0 1 7 2 1 42

Madison 35 9 0 11 2 0 0 57

Maries 11 2 0 0 2 0 0 15

Mississippi 34 0 0 1 9 0 0 44

New Madrid 98 11 0 5 22 2 1 139

Oregon 48 2 0 4 0 0 5 59

Pemiscot 61 13 0 12 31 2 0 119

Perry 46 6 0 2 7 0 8 69

Phelps 132 17 0 11 26 0 10 196

Pulaski 109 41 0 8 18 3 0 179

Reynolds 12 6 0 1 11 0 0 30

Ripley 24 12 0 11 9 0 0 56

Scott 80 1 0 5 43 0 0 129

Shannon 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 24

St Francois 198 49 0 22 12 2 10 293

Ste Genevieve 40 12 0 11 2 0 0 65

Stoddard 108 2 0 20 15 0 8 153

Texas 43 11 0 1 26 0 0 81

Washington 130 18 0 11 4 4 5 172

Wayne 28 17 0 3 7 0 1 56

* Region Total * 1,850 398 0 213 326 33 91 2,911

Southwest Barry 100 39 0 14 11 3 2 169

Barton 11 6 0 2 2 0 1 22

Bates 11 4 0 8 4 0 0 27

Benton 7 6 0 3 0 1 0 17

Camden 81 14 0 8 15 0 3 121

Cedar 20 4 0 2 1 0 2 29

Christian 96 26 0 6 11 1 2 142

Dade 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 6

Dallas 20 7 0 6 1 1 3 38

Douglas 20 12 0 4 6 0 2 44

Greene 307 208 0 54 30 2 16 617

Henry 47 16 0 12 8 0 6 89

Hickory 2 8 0 0 0 0 6 16

Jasper 287 77 0 46 24 1 15 450

Laclede 82 20 0 16 6 0 0 124

Lawrence 69 43 0 12 23 0 2 149

McDonald 44 11 0 9 3 0 6 73

Miller 36 3 0 4 7 2 3 55

Moniteau 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

Morgan 50 6 0 2 0 0 4 62

Newton 73 22 0 6 11 1 1 114

Ozark 16 1 0 2 3 0 1 23

Polk 30 7 0 8 9 1 0 55

St Clair 12 1 0 2 0 0 0 15

Stone 59 32 0 3 18 0 2 114

Taney 150 64 0 16 20 2 4 256

Vernon 21 2 0 5 1 1 0 30

Webster 34 8 0 5 4 0 2 53

Wright 80 21 0 6 4 0 0 111

* Region Total * 1,782 668 0 261 223 16 83 3,033

Kansas City Jackson 1,004 489 0 116 102 16 72 1,799

* Region Total * 1,004 489 0 116 102 16 72 1,799

St. Louis St Louis City 318 126 0 77 93 29 16 659

St Louis County 552 215 0 75 104 24 49 1,019

* Region Total * 870 341 0 152 197 53 65 1,678

Other Icama 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4

* Region Total * 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4

State Total 8,131 2,630 0 1,061 1,354 154 404 13,734

75Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 82: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 27.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous

Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

Number of Placements Average

Total Number of

1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

Atchison 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 2.80

Buchanan 35 33 6 3 4 8 2 9 101 4.85

Caldwell 11 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 22 1.68

Carroll 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2.00

Cass 49 57 29 16 21 18 7 24 223 6.69

Chariton 3 5 0 1 0 1 4 7 21 15.33

Clay 53 38 15 6 9 9 5 9 144 4.06

Clinton 17 13 4 2 1 8 2 2 49 3.98

Cooper 4 2 2 3 1 3 1 3 19 9.00

Daviess 7 4 0 0 0 3 1 0 15 3.20

De Kalb 17 15 1 0 0 2 0 0 35 1.80

Gentry 11 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 21 2.19

Grundy 22 6 11 3 1 2 0 1 46 2.74

Harrison 14 8 8 3 1 2 2 0 38 2.87

Holt 8 4 0 0 0 3 1 1 17 5.06

Johnson 40 25 13 10 9 12 4 2 115 3.39

Lafayette 18 15 0 2 1 6 1 3 47 4.57

Linn 14 29 7 4 6 4 4 4 72 5.06

Livingston 18 27 6 3 3 6 0 1 64 2.94

Mercer 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 8.00

Nodaway 24 7 2 9 5 4 2 1 55 3.35

Pettis 34 32 11 5 2 6 1 6 98 4.08

Platte 13 7 2 7 3 5 1 4 42 5.21

Putnam 7 7 5 1 2 0 0 0 22 2.27

Ray 1 6 4 0 0 1 0 0 12 2.67

Saline 17 8 6 0 2 2 0 4 39 4.62

Sullivan 7 17 2 2 2 4 0 2 36 3.75

Worth 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.25

* Region Total * 447 384 143 80 73 110 40 83 1,366 4.51

Northeast Adair 41 18 15 7 3 3 5 6 98 4.53

Audrain 15 14 6 2 0 13 2 9 61 8.80

Boone 97 69 20 20 12 54 8 22 303 5.46

Callaway 51 29 13 8 9 15 6 9 141 4.64

Clark 13 4 5 7 1 5 1 6 42 6.36

Cole 49 39 26 14 7 14 4 4 157 3.79

Franklin 101 72 40 20 22 32 6 10 306 4.03

Gasconade 7 5 3 2 1 5 0 2 25 4.40

Howard 8 13 2 0 2 4 3 2 34 6.32

Jefferson 280 149 77 57 22 53 17 12 667 3.19

Knox 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 1.63

Lewis 7 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 26 4.54

Lincoln 44 36 18 16 3 9 2 6 134 4.02

Macon 33 18 0 3 3 5 2 4 70 4.31

Marion 87 37 26 17 4 14 12 12 209 4.17

Monroe 17 2 2 1 0 2 1 1 26 2.96

Montgomery 13 13 7 5 1 4 1 3 47 5.74

Osage 6 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 15 1.87

Pike 11 10 2 4 1 5 1 3 37 4.35

Ralls 6 4 4 0 0 4 1 2 21 4.76

Randolph 31 24 15 9 8 12 4 9 112 5.18

Schuyler 5 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 10 5.70

Scotland 11 8 1 1 0 3 0 2 26 4.88

Shelby 8 8 2 2 1 2 1 8 32 12.78

St Charles 91 58 31 20 14 35 7 10 266 3.89

Warren 22 7 16 7 5 7 4 2 70 4.36

* Region Total * 1,060 650 335 225 123 306 91 146 2,943 4.36

Southeast Bollinger 27 14 8 0 2 2 2 2 57 3.28

Butler 89 51 32 18 8 13 14 14 239 4.42

Cape Girardeau 106 49 30 9 11 17 4 9 236 3.34

Carter 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 8 2.88

76Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 83: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 27.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of May 2019

by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous

Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

Number of Placements Average

Total Number of

1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements

Southeast Crawford 28 26 10 6 6 14 2 4 96 4.22

Dent 13 16 6 6 3 11 6 3 64 5.02

Dunklin 46 35 11 12 3 9 4 6 126 3.67

Howell 28 31 13 6 5 13 7 4 107 4.23

Iron 19 4 11 1 4 1 1 1 42 3.05

Madison 23 9 9 5 1 3 2 5 57 5.19

Maries 7 3 2 1 2 0 0 0 15 2.20

Mississippi 19 14 2 5 0 2 1 1 44 2.68

New Madrid 65 22 22 4 9 12 3 2 139 2.98

Oregon 15 18 10 6 4 1 4 1 59 3.39

Pemiscot 52 17 6 7 5 16 8 8 119 4.84

Perry 30 21 9 1 1 3 1 3 69 4.16

Phelps 72 45 25 11 11 14 6 11 196 3.86

Pulaski 50 44 29 16 10 17 4 9 179 4.05

Reynolds 13 10 3 1 0 0 2 1 30 3.00

Ripley 20 15 2 5 2 5 3 4 56 5.36

Scott 46 25 14 18 9 12 5 0 129 3.18

Shannon 10 5 6 2 0 1 0 0 24 2.17

St Francois 100 71 28 24 12 37 9 12 293 4.29

Ste Genevieve 27 9 7 6 2 6 3 5 65 4.97

Stoddard 29 75 17 2 6 11 6 7 153 3.82

Texas 43 9 12 3 4 7 1 1 81 2.62

Washington 47 51 20 15 4 17 9 9 172 4.41

Wayne 13 8 13 1 7 10 2 2 56 4.43

* Region Total * 1,037 703 357 192 131 255 109 124 2,911 3.94

Southwest Barry 44 52 31 15 5 10 3 9 169 4.37

Barton 8 4 1 2 1 3 2 1 22 7.73

Bates 8 7 6 3 1 2 0 0 27 2.56

Benton 7 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 17 4.29

Camden 50 28 11 11 3 8 2 8 121 3.91

Cedar 7 14 1 1 1 1 1 3 29 6.00

Christian 58 32 25 12 7 5 1 2 142 2.58

Dade 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 1.67

Dallas 15 5 3 3 1 5 1 5 38 5.68

Douglas 16 13 6 2 0 2 3 2 44 3.82

Greene 247 129 65 43 27 57 22 26 617 3.74

Henry 35 7 13 13 3 9 1 7 89 4.35

Hickory 11 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 16 4.31

Jasper 144 100 47 30 31 41 24 31 450 4.73

Laclede 53 24 11 7 5 16 4 4 124 3.64

Lawrence 51 24 20 12 9 14 8 9 149 4.72

McDonald 29 14 9 8 3 5 3 2 73 3.52

Miller 14 13 7 7 2 7 0 5 55 6.11

Moniteau 8 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 1.58

Morgan 36 8 3 8 1 6 0 0 62 2.26

Newton 48 22 12 6 6 11 1 7 114 3.88

Ozark 13 3 3 0 0 4 0 0 23 2.61

Polk 14 15 5 2 4 9 1 5 55 5.09

St Clair 9 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 15 4.73

Stone 47 18 14 11 7 11 2 4 114 3.38

Taney 112 64 15 17 10 22 7 9 256 3.56

Vernon 5 10 4 2 1 1 3 3 30 5.97

Webster 30 7 3 2 1 4 2 4 53 4.30

Wright 38 38 14 5 1 6 2 5 111 3.32

* Region Total * 1,161 661 331 225 135 261 95 154 3,033 4.02

Kansas City Jackson 688 376 219 123 94 167 59 66 1,799 3.63

* Region Total * 688 376 219 123 94 167 59 66 1,799 3.63

St. Louis St Louis City 201 124 88 48 31 93 30 42 659 4.92

St Louis County 326 259 143 90 50 89 28 30 1,019 3.71

* Region Total * 527 383 231 138 81 182 58 72 1,678 4.19

Other Icama 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 6.50

* Region Total * 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 6.50

State Total 4,920 3,160 1,616 983 637 1,281 452 646 13,734 4.09

77Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 84: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 28.

Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County

(FY 2019 Adoptions are Year to Date May 2019)

Total

FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 Adoptions

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Atchison 0 0 1 3 2 0 6

Buchanan 11 5 5 16 16 17 70

Caldwell 10 14 10 3 3 1 41

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 7 18 25 33 36 14 133

Chariton 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Clay 33 43 43 42 55 35 251

Clinton 0 1 2 3 0 0 6

Cooper 2 2 0 2 5 6 17

Daviess 0 0 0 3 3 7 13

De Kalb 4 10 24 23 41 26 128

Gentry 0 0 2 0 1 0 3

Grundy 0 0 0 0 1 3 4

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 1 0 2 2 0 0 5

Johnson 20 12 8 15 9 13 77

Lafayette 1 0 0 0 0 4 5

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Livingston 0 0 4 0 0 4 8

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 4 0 4 3 2 5 18

Pettis 6 6 5 6 17 7 47

Platte 12 17 12 21 17 11 90

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Saline 15 20 6 20 9 17 87

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 126 148 154 195 217 174 1,014

Northeast Adair 5 10 6 15 8 6 50

Audrain 3 13 10 14 8 6 54

Boone 36 30 44 40 42 34 226

Callaway 0 0 1 2 1 4 8

Clark 0 0 3 1 0 1 5

Cole 12 10 29 24 17 18 110

Franklin 23 36 21 29 64 51 224

Gasconade 1 2 0 2 6 3 14

Howard 0 1 7 0 2 1 11

Jefferson 45 46 47 41 59 61 299

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Lincoln 13 13 15 10 30 8 89

Macon 3 5 4 3 4 2 21

Marion 7 15 12 13 10 9 66

Monroe 1 2 1 0 2 8 14

Montgomery 1 0 1 0 2 9 13

Osage 0 0 0 2 0 0 2

Pike 0 2 1 0 2 8 13

Ralls 2 2 1 3 1 1 10

Randolph 10 0 2 10 15 13 50

Schuyler 1 0 2 0 0 0 3

Scotland 0 0 2 1 0 1 4

Shelby 0 2 6 2 2 0 12

St Charles 11 35 42 41 49 39 217

Warren 6 2 3 15 9 5 40

* Region Total * 181 226 260 268 333 288 1,556

Southeast Bollinger 2 5 0 3 1 3 14

Butler 0 1 4 1 0 3 9

Cape Girardeau 7 3 16 24 23 27 100

Carter 0 2 1 1 6 0 10

Crawford 0 0 0 0 10 12 22

78Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 85: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 28.

Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County

(FY 2019 Adoptions are Year to Date May 2019)

Total

FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 Adoptions

Southeast Dent 2 0 0 2 1 6 11

Dunklin 1 0 0 1 2 1 5

Howell 4 3 3 1 9 8 28

Iron 5 3 2 16 8 12 46

Madison 0 1 0 0 3 2 6

Maries 0 0 5 2 8 0 15

Mississippi 0 0 0 4 2 1 7

New Madrid 0 0 3 0 0 0 3

Oregon 1 1 2 0 0 2 6

Pemiscot 11 0 1 16 9 11 48

Perry 2 3 2 6 4 9 26

Phelps 6 9 20 17 11 14 77

Pulaski 19 11 24 16 19 12 101

Reynolds 1 0 0 5 4 1 11

Ripley 10 27 56 43 25 11 172

Scott 5 8 8 9 9 2 41

Shannon 7 1 0 4 0 1 13

St Francois 35 34 30 34 50 60 243

Ste Genevieve 1 1 0 1 0 0 3

Stoddard 23 18 17 24 35 28 145

Texas 3 8 10 21 3 13 58

Washington 2 0 1 1 2 3 9

Wayne 8 2 14 14 8 2 48

* Region Total * 155 141 219 266 252 244 1,277

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 3 3

Barton 8 11 5 3 9 7 43

Bates 0 0 1 0 8 4 13

Benton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Camden 4 4 4 11 6 5 34

Cedar 1 8 1 5 0 7 22

Christian 30 23 39 48 41 25 206

Dade 0 2 3 2 4 5 16

Dallas 2 0 0 0 0 1 3

Douglas 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Greene 126 92 131 141 121 123 734

Henry 12 12 14 9 21 7 75

Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Jasper 91 67 68 57 61 55 399

Laclede 17 38 26 33 48 45 207

Lawrence 43 39 49 48 43 38 260

McDonald 13 6 13 16 11 9 68

Miller 0 2 0 0 6 2 10

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 19 46 47 20 17 22 171

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Taney 22 16 20 24 29 26 137

Vernon 1 6 0 10 3 8 28

Webster 31 23 38 58 58 24 232

Wright 11 10 34 10 10 18 93

* Region Total * 432 409 493 496 497 435 2,762

Kansas City Jackson 215 241 271 244 281 274 1,526

* Region Total * 215 241 271 244 281 274 1,526

St. Louis St Louis City 70 72 57 40 55 33 327

St Louis County 67 74 81 90 106 101 519

* Region Total * 137 146 138 130 161 134 846

Other Icama 5 5 1 1 2 1 15

* Region Total * 5 5 1 1 2 1 15

State Total 1,251 1,316 1,536 1,600 1,743 1,550 8,996

79Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 86: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 16.

Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody

During May 2019

Total Entries Total Re Entries

12,000

12,200

12,400

12,600

12,800

13,000

13,200

13,400

13,600

13,800

14,000

May

-17

Jun

-17

Jul-

17

Au

g-1

7

Sep

-17

Oct

-17

No

v-1

7

De

c-1

7

Jan

-18

Feb

-18

Mar

-18

Ap

r-1

8

May

-18

Jun

-18

Jul-

18

Au

g-1

8

Sep

-18

Oct

-18

No

v-1

8

De

c-1

8

Jan

-19

Feb

-19

Mar

-19

Ap

r-1

9

May

-19

Figure 17.

Children Active in Children's Division Custody

on the Last day of the Month May 2017 Through May 2019

80Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 87: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

May

-17

Jun

-17

Jul-

17

Au

g-1

7

Sep

-17

Oct

-17

No

v-1

7

De

c-1

7

Jan

-18

Feb

-18

Mar

-18

Ap

r-1

8

May

-18

Jun

-18

Jul-

18

Au

g-1

8

Sep

-18

Oct

-18

No

v-1

8

De

c-1

8

Jan

-19

Feb

-19

Mar

-19

Ap

r-1

9

May

-19

Figure 19.

Adoptions Finalized by Month

May 2017 Through May 2019

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 18.

Children Closing from Alternative Care During May 2019 by Reason for Case Closing and Region

Returned Home Other

81Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 88: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +

Figure 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody as of May 2019

by Age and Placement Category

Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

May

-15

Jul-

15

Sep

-15

No

v-1

5

Jan

-16

Mar

-16

May

-16

Jul-

16

Sep

-16

No

v-1

6

Jan

-17

Mar

-17

May

-17

Jul-

17

Sep

-17

No

v-1

7

Jan

-18

Mar

-18

May

-18

Jul-

18

Sep

-18

No

v-1

8

Jan

-19

Mar

-19

May

-19

Figure 21.

Children in Children's Division Custody

as of the Last Day of the Month May 2015 Through May 2019 by Placement Category

Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home

82Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 89: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

20

14

-3

20

14

-4

20

15

-1

20

15

-2

20

15

-3

20

15

-4

20

16

-1

20

16

-2

20

16

-3

20

16

-4

20

17

-1

20

17

-2

20

17

-3

20

17

-4

20

18

-1

20

18

-2

20

18

-3

20

18

-4

20

19

-1

20

19

-2

Exit

s p

er

10

0 C

hild

ren

in

Fost

er

Car

e P

op

ula

tio

n

Figure 22.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody

by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition 3rd Quarter 2014 Through 2nd Quarter 2019

Adoption Child Independence Other Legal Status Relative Home Other Closing Return Home

83Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 90: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 84 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures

Table 14.

• This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time.

• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 15.

• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home Placements.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 16.

• This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.

Table 17. and Table 18.

• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the

month. Table values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.

Table 19.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

Page 91: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 85 Research and Data Analysis

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP

Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG

Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May

19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 20.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Placement Types are:

ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other)

ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent

CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention

FAH Foster Adoptive Home

FGB Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FGH Foster Family Group Home

FGM Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home

FHE Emergency Foster Home

FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home

ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home

KHB Kinship Behavioral Home

KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home

KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy

MMD Medical Facility MMF Mental Health Facility

MMH Mental Health Home

MMW Mental Health Medicaid Waiver RFA Residential Treatment Facility

RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2

RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3

RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency

RFH Residential Foster Home RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant

RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare

RHB Behavioral Relative Home

RHM Medical Relative Home

Page 92: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 86 Research and Data Analysis

Table 20 (contd).

RHO Relative Home

RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway

SCH School

TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group

TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site

Table 21.

• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP

Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Table 22.

Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.

• Closing categories include the following closing reasons:

Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to sending state)

Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative)

Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency

Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship and Other

Table 23.

• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative

and/or legal father).

• Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been

completed (TPR is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).

• Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal

Status 5.

• No Identified Adoptive Resource includes Legal Status 1 children with a Goal of 'AD' and no

pre-adoptive placement marked.

Page 93: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 87 Research and Data Analysis

Table 24.

• This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, FH, LA, RH, and KH.

• Existing vendor types RH and KH were added to this table in October 2015 and are shown

under the heading Relative Home.

• Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have

either no previous license or one which ended more than five years ago.

• The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago” represent unduplicated vendor counts.

Table 25.

• Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody)

LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents

LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency

LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care)

LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship

LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement

Table 26.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Goals are: 01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s)

AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child

06 - Child Independence/Independent Living

07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives

09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing

Table 27.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of

placements experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1.

• The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors.

• Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous

vendor.

Page 94: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 88 Research and Data Analysis

Table 28.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children

are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.

Figure 18.

• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s)

Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated,

Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.

Figure 19.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children

are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal

Status 5.

Figure 20.

• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP

Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG

Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Figure 21.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Page 95: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Intensive In-Home Services

Page 96: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 29.

Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During May 2019

Grouped by Referral County

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Livingston 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Putnam 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 1 7.69% 10 76.92% 2 15.38% 13

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5

Audrain 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Boone 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Callaway 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cole 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Franklin 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 0 0.00% 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Lincoln 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5

Macon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Monroe 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

St Charles 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7

Warren 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 34 66.67% 17 33.33% 51

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Cape Girardeau 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

for Screening

Referrals Accepted

Accepted

Referrals

Accepted

Referrals Not

90

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 97: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 29.

Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During May 2019

Grouped by Referral County

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Iron 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Ste Genevieve 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Stoddard 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 6 28.57% 12 57.14% 3 14.29% 21

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Camden 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 0 0.00% 9 75.00% 3 25.00% 12

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 0 0.00% 9 56.25% 7 43.75% 16

Laclede 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lawrence 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Taney 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Wright 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 37 68.52% 17 31.48% 54

Kansas City Jackson 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 3 27.27% 11

* Region Total * 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 3 27.27% 11

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 6 46.15% 7 53.85% 13

St Louis County 2 5.88% 21 61.76% 11 32.35% 34

* Region Total * 2 4.26% 27 57.45% 18 38.30% 47

State Total 11 5.58% 126 63.96% 60 30.46% 197

Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Not

for Screening Accepted Accepted

91

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 98: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 30.

Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During May 2019

Grouped by Household County

Families Children Average # At-Risk Average # At-Risk

Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Buchanan 2 4 2.00 2 1.00

Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Cass 2 5 2.50 5 2.50

Chariton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Clay 2 3 1.50 3 1.50

Clinton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Cooper 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

De Kalb 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Gentry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Grundy 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Harrison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Johnson 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Lafayette 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

Linn 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

Livingston 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Nodaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pettis 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

Platte 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Putnam 1 5 5.00 5 5.00

Ray 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Saline 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Sullivan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

* Region Total * 13 31 2.38 27 2.08

Northeast Adair 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

Audrain 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Boone 4 10 2.50 9 2.25

Callaway 2 12 6.00 9 4.50

Clark 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Cole 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Franklin 5 7 1.40 7 1.40

Gasconade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Howard 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Jefferson 5 14 2.80 10 2.00

Knox 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Lewis 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Lincoln 2 6 3.00 4 2.00

Macon 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Marion 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Monroe 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Montgomery 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Osage 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Pike 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ralls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Randolph 3 4 1.33 3 1.00

Schuyler 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Scotland 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Shelby 2 8 4.00 8 4.00

St Charles 4 8 2.00 4 1.00

Warren 1 4 4.00 1 1.00

* Region Total * 36 91 2.53 69 1.92

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Butler 2 5 2.50 5 2.50

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Carter 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

92

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 99: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 30.

Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During May 2019

Grouped by Household County

Families Children Average # of At-Risk Average # of At-Risk

Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family

Southeast Crawford 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Dent 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dunklin 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Howell 0 2 0.00 1 0.00

Iron 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Madison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Maries 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

New Madrid 2 4 2.00 4 2.00

Oregon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pemiscot 2 7 3.50 7 3.50

Perry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Phelps 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Pulaski 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Reynolds 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ripley 1 6 6.00 6 6.00

Scott 1 3 3.00 2 2.00

Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

St Francois 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Stoddard 2 5 2.50 4 2.00

Texas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Washington 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Wayne 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

* Region Total * 13 38 2.92 35 2.69

Southwest Barry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Barton 1 3 3.00 2 2.00

Bates 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Benton 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Camden 3 7 2.33 7 2.33

Cedar 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Christian 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dallas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Douglas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Greene 9 28 3.11 25 2.78

Henry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Hickory 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Jasper 8 25 3.13 20 2.50

Laclede 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Lawrence 2 5 2.50 4 2.00

McDonald 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Miller 3 9 3.00 7 2.33

Moniteau 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Morgan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Newton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ozark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Polk 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

St Clair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Stone 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Taney 2 4 2.00 4 2.00

Vernon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Webster 2 12 6.00 6 3.00

Wright 2 2 1.00 2 1.00

* Region Total * 37 105 2.84 84 2.27

Kansas City Jackson 7 19 2.71 19 2.71

* Region Total * 7 19 2.71 19 2.71

St. Louis St Louis City 5 15 3.00 11 2.20

St Louis County 19 41 2.16 39 2.05

* Region Total * 24 56 2.33 50 2.08

State Total 130 340 2.62 284 2.18

93

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 100: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 31.

Exit Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During May 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Livingston 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 7

Northeast Adair 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Audrain 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Boone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Callaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cole 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Franklin 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Gasconade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Jefferson 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Warren 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 19 70.37% 6 22.22% 2 7.41% 27

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Family Intact Family Not Intact Other

94Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 101: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 31.

Exit Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During May 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Scott 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Southwest Barry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Barton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Camden 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Greene 7 77.78% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 9

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8

Laclede 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lawrence 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

McDonald 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Miller 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Polk 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Taney 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 30 78.95% 7 18.42% 1 2.63% 38

Kansas City Jackson 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

St. Louis St Louis City 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

St Louis County 9 90.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 10

* Region Total * 16 88.89% 1 5.56% 1 5.56% 18

State Total 74 77.08% 18 18.75% 4 4.17% 96

Family Not Intact Family Intact Other

95Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 102: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 32.

Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During November 2018

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 10 90.91% 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 11

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

96Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 103: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 32.

Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During November 2018

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Laclede 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Polk 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 11 78.57% 3 21.43% 0 0.00% 14

Kansas City Jackson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

St. Louis St Louis City 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Louis County 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

State Total 27 81.82% 5 15.15% 1 3.03% 33

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

97Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 104: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 33.

Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During May 2018

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

98Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 105: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Table 33.

Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During May 2018

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Laclede 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Moniteau 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 6 60.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 10

Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

State Total 13 72.22% 4 22.22% 1 5.56% 18

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

99Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 106: Children's Services Management Report · 2019-06-25 · Mission Statement: “We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure

Children’s Services Management Report 100 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables

Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33.

• Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question

and an exit status which is not missing.

• Exit status includes the following status codes:

Family Intact

10 Family Intact

Family Not Intact

12 Child Ran Away 13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed)

14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered) 15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered)

16 In Foster Home or Group Home

17 In Residential 18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services)

19 In Juvenile Justice 20 In In-Patient Psychiatric

Other

11 Can't Locate Family

21 Information Not Available 99 Other

Table 32. and Table 33.

Tables include only those families which responded to follow-up requests. These do not

equal the numbers for Table 31. for the corresponding table six or twelve months prior.