china semiconductors · 2019-11-24 · in 2016. domestic semiconductor consumption grew 2.9% in...
TRANSCRIPT
Play interview withFrank He
China SemiconductorsNarrowing the gap – China’s great chip challenge
China’s semiconductor industry is making rapid advances but still falls far short of meeting domestic demand
We identify investment opportunities in areas where the technology gap with foreign rivals is narrowing
We initiate coverage on the A-share semiconductor supply chain – Naura (Buy), Han’s Laser (Buy), Tongfu (Buy), and GigaDevice (Hold)
By: Frank He (S1700517120005)
EQUITY RESEARCH REPORTTELECOMS, MEDIA & TECHNOLOGYSeptember 2018
Disclaimer & Disclosures: This report must be read with the disclosures and the analyst certifications in the Disclosure appendix, and with the Disclaimer, which forms part of it
https://www.research.hsbc.com
China’s semiconductor industry is making rapid advances but still falls far short of meeting domestic demand
We identify investment opportunities in areas where the technology gap with foreign rivals is narrowing
We initiate coverage on the A-share semiconductor supply chain – Naura (Buy), Han’s Laser (Buy), Tongfu (Buy), and GigaDevice (Hold)
加入智库微信群,每日免费获取报告
1、每日微信群分享 3+最新重磅报告;
2、每日分享当日华尔街日报;
3、每周分享经济学人期刊;
4、每月汇总150+行业报告
扫码加入时请备注“东西智库”
加入VIP小密圈,以上报告合集下载
1、加入小密圈即送3000+专属报告;
2、小密圈提供本站报告合集下载
3、智能制造供应链对接(产需对接)
4、独家产业信息、数据分享
1
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Why read this report?
China’s high-tech economy needs far more home-grown
chips – we explain where they will come from
We identify which A-share companies stand to benefit
most from this move up the technology ladder
We initiate coverage on four major players in China’s
semiconductor supply chain – Naura (Buy), Han’s Laser
(Buy), Tongfu (Buy), and GigaDevice (Hold)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
2
Narrowing the gap 3
The rise of China’s IC makers 11
Three opportunities 20
Company updates 44
Naura (002371 CH) 45
Han’s Laser (002008 CH) 59
Tongfu Microelectronics
(002156 CH) 72
GigaDevice (603986 CH) 83
Disclosure appendix 98
Disclaimer 101
Contents
3
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
As in so many other industries, the market for semiconductors in
China is the biggest in the world. The problem is that only a
fraction are made by domestic companies, creating a technology
gap that is too wide for comfort. This report looks at how China
plans to close the gap and identifies the most promising A-share
investments linked to this theme. We initiate coverage on Naura
(Buy), Han’s Laser (Buy), Tongfu (Buy), and GigaDevice (Hold).
Few can dispute that China’s tech industry is now a force to be reckoned with. In areas such as
mobile payments, e-commerce and telecom equipment, Chinese companies are already the
envy of the world. Elsewhere, however, a great deal of work remains to be done.
Nowhere is this more apparent than in the realm of semiconductors, the integrated circuits used
in everything from telecom equipment and personal computers to giant servers and applications
for artificial intelligence and robotics. One stat helps to tell the story – while China is the world’s
biggest chip market, an industry estimate suggests that only 13% of the semiconductors
required by the country’s tech industry were manufactured by domestic companies last year
(this figure rises to 42% if the output by foreign companies in China is included).
This reliance on products imported from other countries is a concern for China’s government. It
has made technological independence a policy priority, especially now that trade tensions with
the US are rising. China has no desire to remain the world’s No 1 assembler of electronics. It
wants to be at the forefront of designing and manufacturing the semiconductors that will drive its
new, high-tech and smarter economy in the age of artificial intelligence, 5G telecom, the Internet
of Things (IoT), and autonomous driving. In this report we:
Identify investment opportunities in areas where we believe Chinese companies have
competitive advantages or can gain market share, such as the design of integrated circuits
(ICs), semiconductor equipment, and IC packaging and testing.
Assess the drivers that will help to close the technology gap, including huge investments in
capital expenditure and R&D, as well as supportive government policy.
Look at the obstacles that stand in China’s way, such as restrictions on imports, the
difficulty of making overseas acquisitions, and limited domestic supply of key materials in
the semiconductor supply chain.
Initiate coverage on four A-share companies in that supply chain – Naura (Buy), Han’s
Laser (Buy), Tongfu (Buy) and GigaDevice (Hold).
Narrowing the gap
This reliance on products
imported from other
countries is a concern
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
4
Investment opportunities
China has been looking to accelerate the development its domestic semiconductor market for
several years. According the roadmap outlined in the high-profile “Made in China 2025”
industrial development policy, China’s self-sufficiency in integrated circuits will increase to 49%
in 2020 and 75% in 2030, including production by foreign companies. The recent trade tensions
with the US have underlined the importance of this policy. For example, the ban on US sales to
domestic telecom equipment manufacturer ZTE Corp – since lifted – highlighted the
dependence of Chinese companies on imported chips.
It’s a huge market. China is the biggest consumer and importer of semiconductors, accounting
for USD193bn of USD343bn of global sales of integrated circuits last year. China produced
1.9bn smartphones, 307m PCs and 172m TVs in 2017, accounting for over 90%, 70% and 80%
of global supply, respectively. At the same time, we estimate that Huawei and ZTE share over
50% of the global telecom equipment market. So, given current trade relations with the US, the
need for technological independence has never been greater.
As usual in China, growth has been remarkable. According to data from PWC, China’s
semiconductor consumption growth exceeded worldwide growth for the sixth consecutive year
in 2016. Domestic semiconductor consumption grew 2.9% in 2016 to reach record 60.6% of the
global market, while the worldwide semiconductor market only grew 1.1%. During the past 10
years, semiconductor consumption in China has grown at CAGR of 12%, far ahead of the global
rate of 3.2%.
And, as always in China, policy support is a major factor. To accelerate efforts to gain
self-sufficiency in semiconductors, in 2014 the government set up the China National Integrated
Circuit Industry Investment Fund. According the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology
(MIIT), the goal is to invest in chip manufacturing, boost industrial production and research, and
promote mergers and acquisitions.
The fund operates as a corporate entity under the MIIT and the Ministry of Finance. Commonly
referred to as the “Big Fund”, it has previously backed major projects including a Tsinghua
Unigroup memory chip plant worth USD24bn that is under construction in the city of Wuhan
(source: Reuters, 25 April 2018). A second fund is being put together to provide further support
for the sector.
In another policy move, China’s finance ministry has introduced tax breaks for domestic
chipmakers (Reuters, 30 March 2018). Chipmakers will be exempt from corporate taxes for two to
five years followed by partial deductions. The exemptions cover a range of products, from very
basic to cutting-edge chips, for use in computers, smartphones and other electronic devices.
We think that all these developments create opportunities for investors, especially in areas
where we believe Chinese companies have a competitive edge or are well positioned to gain
market share. They include:
IC design
Ten Chinese companies were ranked in the world’s top 50 IC design companies last year, up
from one in 2009. Their market share has increased from 5% in 2010 to 11% in 2017. Chinese
companies have a particularly strong presence in application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC)
based artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain as well as the NOR flash memory segment. The
addressable market size of ASIC-based AI chips will surge from USD1bn in 2017 to USD4.6bn
in 2020, according to Frost & Sullivan, and account for 30% of the total chip market in 2020, up
from 19% in 2017. We see a balanced demand and supply outlook for NOR flash in 2018-19,
which would favour leading suppliers such as GigaDevice.
The recent trade tensions
with the US have underlined
the importance of this policy
As always in China, policy
support is a major factor
5
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Equipment
China’s spending on fab equipment is set to increase by 57% y-o-y in 2018 and 60% in 2019
according to SEMI, a provider of data on the electronics supply chain. This means China is likely to
overtake Korea, the world’s biggest spender in this area, in 2019. Since May last year Chinese
companies have been able to mass produce over 16 kinds of front-end wafer fabrication equipment
(mainly covering 28nm and above). The issue here is that their aggregate market share in equipment
installation in Chinese foundries is still only 5%. The big gap between the high capex cycle and the
low self-sufficiency ratio creates ample opportunities for domestic semi equipment makers. We
believe Naura will be the major beneficiary in this localization trend in wafer fabrication.
Packaging and testing
IC packaging and testing is the sector where the technology gap between Chinese companies
and global rivals is the smallest. Industry consolidation via M&A has increased the competitive
strength of Chinese vendors in the past three years. Among the global top 10 outsourced
assembly and test (OSAT) companies the revenue contribution from China’s three leaders –
JECT, Huatian, Tongfu – has increased from 6.6% in 2011 to 21.2% in 2017, driven by organic
growth and acquisition. We think a shift in industry drivers from smartphones to automobiles and
the Internet of Things (IoT) will change the competitive landscape. We like Tongfu due to its
strategic acquisition of two packaging and test fabs owned by Advanced Micro Devices (AMD),
a US company, and its customer base that includes NXP, MediaTek, Texas Instruments,
Infineon, and STMicro.
Exhibit 1. China IC supply chain
EDA software
Fabless design Foundry OSAT Equipment Material
ICScape
HiSilicon
Allwinner Tech
SMIC
JCET
Naura
Shanghai Sinyang
GigaDevice Goke Micro Huahong Huatian AMEC Ningbo Konfoong Spreadtrum Ingenic Huali Tongfu Zhejiang JingSheng Kumpur RDA Fullhan
WLCSP Han's Laser Suzhou Ruihong
Goodix Bitmain
SJ Semi ACM Research
Guoxin Micro Cambricon
Universal Scientific
Shanghai Micro Electornics
Will Semi Canaan
Piotech
Hangzhou Silan Microelectronics Yangtze Memory/Wuhan XMC Hefei Changxin Fujian Jinhua
Note: listed companies are highlighted red
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Stock initiations
Naura (002371 CH, Buy)
Naura Technology is a leading advanced electronic equipment and precision component maker, with
products covering the semiconductor, LED, photovoltaic, display, and aerospace industries. It is
China’s largest semiconductor equipment company in terms of revenue, with a comprehensive
product portfolio covering etcher, physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD),
oxidation, and cleaning. Its customers include SMIC, Huali Microelectronics, San’An, HC SemiTek,
BOE, and Longi Silicon. The company provides 28nm and above and is in the R&D stage for 14nm.
We forecast Naura to achieve a 52% net profit CAGR over 2017-20e. Catalysts include design wins
from foundry customers, R&D breakthroughs in 28nm, plus IC equipment. We initiate coverage with
a Buy rating and a target price of RMB63.97, based on one standard deviation above the mid-cycle
price to sales (P/S) ratio of 8.4x.
IC packaging and testing is the
sector where the technology
gap is the smallest
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
6
Han’s Laser (002008 CH, Buy)
Han’s Laser is a leading laser and automation equipment and system provider. It supplies
products for laser labeling/cutting/welding equipment for consumer electronics and industrial
applications, PCB/LED/semiconductor special equipment, robots, automation equipment and
system solutions. We believe a recovery in orders for Apple in 2019, structural growth in high
power lasers and wider laser applications, and growing vertical integration will enable the
company to achieve a 29% net profit CAGR over 2017-20e. Moreover, we think the strategic
move into semiconductor equipment through the acquisition of US company Fortrend will be a
new growth driver. Catalysts include order wins in high power and semiconductor equipment, as
well as the self development of high power laser generators. We initiate coverage with a Buy
rating and a target price of RMB50.59, based on 22x mid-cycle PE.
Tongfu Microelectronics (002156 CH, Buy)
Tongfu is the third largest packaging & testing company in China. The company is enhancing its
competitiveness via the acquisition of an 85% stake in AMD’s packaging and testing fabs in
Suzhou and Penang in 2016 (in collaboration with China’s national IC fund). Tongfu now
captures over 80% of AMD’s total packaging & testing business and AMD accounted for 45% of
total revenue in 2017. The company is set to benefit from AMD’s potential market share gains in
PC, server CPU, and graphic cards in the coming years. Meanwhile, new orders from Bitmain
and Broadcom in 2018-19 and its high exposure to auto IC customers also serve as a long-term
driver. We forecast a 44% net profit CAGR in 2018-20e, which is slightly higher than the A-
share sector average CAGR of 37%. Catalysts include new customer acquisitions, improved
product mix, and breakthroughs in advanced packaging. We initiate coverage with a Buy rating
and a target price of RMB12.05, based on 35x (A-share semiconductor sector average) forward
PE.
GigaDevice (603986 CH, Hold)
GigaDevice is China’s primary memory IC design house, with strong exposure to NAND flash,
microcontrollers (MCU), and NOR flash. It had a 13% global market share in NOR flash in 2017.
Its key customers include Spreadtrum, RDA, MediaTek and Samsung. Leveraging its close
relationship with SMIC, we believe the company will continue to gain market share in low-
density NOR flash while seeking opportunities in advanced NOR flash and SLC NAND flash
markets. Moreover, its strategic partnership with the Hefei city government in Anhui Province to
develop 19nm DDR4 DRAM should be a long-term growth driver. We forecast the company will
register a 37% net profit CAGR over 2017-20e; catalysts include R&D progress in DRAM and
NAND flash. We initiate coverage with a Hold rating and a target price of RMB107.19, based on
45.3x historical average forward PE.
Key customers include
Spreadtrum, RDA, MediaTek
and Samsung
7
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 2. 2017 revenue breakdown for covered semiconductor stocks
Product Naura Han's Laser GigaDevice Tongfu
NOR flash 85%
IC Design NAND 0%
MCU 14%
Packaging & testing
99%
Equipment
IC/Semiconductor 18% 2%
LED 23% 5%
Solar 14%
Display 6%
Lithium battery 4%
PCB 10%
Laser 81%
Component 34%
Others 1% 2% 0% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Exhibit 3. Valuation summary table
Ticker Company Name
HSBC Rating
Market cap USDm
ADVT USDm CP TP Upside Valuation methodology
EPS CAGR 2017-20e
002371 CH Naura Buy 3,257 142 53.26 63.97 20% 12m forward PS of 8.4x, +1 std above mid-cycle 52% 002008 CH Han’s Laser Buy 6,427 129 42.77 50.59 18% 12m forward PE of 22x, mid-cycle 29% 002156 CH Tongfu Buy 1,716 22 10.05 12.05 20% 12m forward PE of 35x, A-share sector average multiple 74% 603986 CH GigaDevice Hold 4,514 119 110.00 107.19 -3% 12m forward PE of 45.3x, mid-cycle 37%
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities. Note: share prices as at close of 3 Sep 2018.
Where we are different from consensus
Our earnings estimates for 2019-20e for Han’s Laser and Tongfu are generally in-line or higher
than Bloomberg consensus. We are more optimistic on Han’s Laser‘s long-term growth potential
of sales in high power lasers, semiconductors, and OLED equipment sales. We also see
revenue upside for Tongfu as it switches AMD’s two in-house fabs to OSATs, as well as order
wins from domestic customers in the long term.
Our estimates for GigaDevice and Naura are much lower than market expectations. For
GigaDevice, we model a flattish pricing trend for NOR flash as the company focuses on low-
density product categories which are not facing supply shortages. Our 2018 revenue and profit
estimates for Naura are in line with company guidance. For 2019-20, we remain positive on the
sales growth of IC equipment – its core business – but are cautious on solar and LED
equipment revenue.
Exhibit 4. Our EPS growth forecasts vs consensus
Company Stock code CP RMB HSBC rating TP RMB
_______ HSBC Qianhai _______ ________ Consensus _________ ____ HSBC vs Consensus _____ 2018e 2019e 2020e 2018e 2019e 2020e 2018e 2019e 2020e
Naura 002371 CH 53.26 Buy 63.97 0.37 0.62 0.97 0.53 0.81 1.12 -30% -24% -14% Han’s Laser 002008 CH 42.77 Buy 50.59 1.82 2.60 3.55 1.95 2.47 3.19 -6% 5% 5% Tongfu 002156 CH 10.05 Buy 12.05 0.27 0.40 0.55 0.29 0.40 0.51 -8% -1% 8% GigaDevice 603986 CH 110.00 Hold 107.19 1.93 2.69 3.63 2.27 3.12 4.21 -14% -12% -12%
Source: Bloomberg, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates (priced at close of 3 Sep 2018)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
8
Risk factors
Restrictions on component, equipment and IP imports from the US
Friction between China and the US over trade and intellectual property have resulted in the US
government imposing sanctions on certain Chinese technology companies. In April, US companies
were banned from exporting products/services to ZTE; the ban was lifted after ZTE paid a USD1.4bn
penalty. Then, in August, sanctions prohibited the export of products and technology to 44 Chinese
technology companies and research institutes with exposure to the military and aviation.
Meanwhile, China’s regulator has still not approved Qualcomm’s proposed acquisition of NXP
Semiconductors, a Dutch company with a high level of exposure to the China market. Any
further escalation of trade tensions might lead to additional tightening measures on Chinese
technology companies that rely on components, equipment and intellectual property (IP) imports
from the US, as well as Chinese exports to the US.
Take IC equipment as an example. US companies such as Applied Materials and Lam
Research have leading positions in making advanced IC equipment which Chinese companies
are not able to produce domestically. Failure to procure IC equipment from US companies may
lead to a significant slowdown in the development of China’s IC foundries. Here we summarise
the risks and potential impact on our covered stocks:
Naura: The company doesn’t disclose details about its sourcing strategy but we believe it sources
some of its components/parts from overseas, including the US. Naura indicates that each
component/part normally has more than one supplier, which gives it some flexibility in terms of
sourcing. Naura doesn’t have US export exposure as it mainly serves domestic customers.
Han’s Laser: Han’s sourced 80% of its high-power lasers from US supplier IPG Photonics for
its high-power equipment segment in 2017, which accounted for 18% of total revenue last year.
This year the company has started to build its own lasers, with power output of 1kw. IPG also
has multiple manufacturing facilities around the world, including in the US, Germany, Russia
and Italy, which could help to avoid any potential import duties and export controls. Han’s has
minimal export sales to the US.
Tongfu: The company mainly sources packaging & testing equipment from Japan, Korea,
Singapore and Europe, with minimal exposure to US. However, its largest customers include
leading US IC fabless and IDMs, such as AMD, Broadcom, and Texas Instruments. We
estimate sales to US customers represent over 50% of its total revenue.
GigaDevice: The company relies mainly on domestic foundry and OSAT in IC manufacturing
and packaging, and its customers are mostly domestic OEMs, so exposure to the US is small.
More broadly speaking, leading semiconductor companies may become more aggressive in
terms of defending their market share and industry positions in the light of technological
advances being made by Chinese peers. For example, leading overseas IC equipment
suppliers have traditionally charged premium prices for equipment that China is not able to
produce. Once Chinese tech companies catch up, foreign suppliers may significantly lower their
selling prices in order to squeeze the margins of domestic companies.
Exposure to US sales and
component supply varies by
company
9
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Valuation and risks
Valuation Risks
Naura
002371 CH
Current price:
RMB53.26
Target price:
RMB63.97
Up/downside:
20%
We apply 12m forward P/S instead of PE to value Naura as: 1)
Naura’s earnings performance is volatile and largely depends on
government subsidies; 2) Naura is still at the early stage of
attracting foundry customers and offers ample revenue growth
potential. We estimate a 52% earnings CAGR in 2017-20e, vs. 6%
in 2010-17. The stock is trading at 6.8x forward P/S, in line with its
mid-cycle average of 6.3x. In light of Naura’s faster revenue growth
outlook, we think it is reasonable to apply one standard deviation
above mid-cycle of 8.4x to set the target price, which equals
RMB63.97, implying 20% upside. We initiate with a Buy rating.
Slower-than-expected development in advanced IC
equipment
Slower order inflow and customer concentration of solar
equipment
Uncertainty over government subsidies and income
recognition
Buy
Frank He | [email protected] | +86 755 8898 3136
Han’s Laser
002008 CH
Current price:
RMB42.77
Target price:
RMB50.59
Up/downside:
18%
We apply a 12m forward PE to value Han’s Laser. We project a net
profit CAGR of 29% over 2017-20e, in line with the 32% CAGR
during 2008-17. We think it is reasonable to apply a mid-cycle
average valuation of 22x for the stock, which translates into our
target price of RMB50.59, implying 18% upside. With the growing
diversification of its customer base and a solid earnings growth
outlook, we believe our target multiple valuation is justified. We
initiate with a Buy rating.
Slower innovation progress by key customers
Slower laser source import substitution progress
Regulatory changes in component sourcing policy
Buy
Frank He | [email protected] | +86 755 8898 3136
Tongfu
002156 CH
Current price:
RMB10.05
Target price:
RMB12.05
Up/downside:
20%
We apply a 12m forward PE to value Tongfu. The shares have
historically traded in quite a wide range, with an average mid-cycle
forward PE of 60x and one standard deviation of 33x, given its
cyclical earnings trend before 2015. But since the acquisition of
AMD’s packaging and testing fabs in 2016, we believe Tongfu’s
revenue and earnings growth profile has structurally changed and
become less volatile and more predictable. Therefore, we apply the
A-share semiconductor peer group’s valuation matrix to value the
stock. We apply a 35x forward PE to Tongfu, in line with A-share
sector average multiple. Accordingly, we derive a 12m target price
for Tongfu of RMB12.05, implying 20% upside. We initiate with a
Buy rating.
High revenue contribution from single client
High reliance on external sourcing of raw materials and key
components
Market share loss in key customers
Longer-than-expected new customer order wins
Buy
Frank He | [email protected] | +86 755 8898 3136
GigaDevice
603986 CH
Current price:
RMB110.00
Target price:
RMB107.19
Up/downside:
-3%
We apply a 12m forward PE to value GigaDevice, with reference to
its historical valuation and earnings growth trend. We forecast a
37% net profit CAGR in 2017-20e, similar to its historical CAGR of
44% during 2012-17. We believe it is reasonable to apply a
historical average forward PE of 45.3x to value the stock.
Accordingly, our 12m target price is RMB107.19, implying -3%
downside. We rate the stock as a Hold.
Upside
Design wins in high-density, high-quality NOR Flash
Higher revenue growth in SLC NAND Flash
Downside
Lower NOR flash pricing and margin
Slower-than-expected DRAM project development
Hold
Frank He | [email protected] | +86 755 8898 3136
Priced at 3 Sep 2018 Source: HSBC estimates
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
10
Exhibit 5. Comparable global semiconductor value chain
Ticker Company Currency Price Market cap
USDm DAV
USDm _ PE (x) __ PS (x) PB (x) EPS CAGR
18-20e EV/EBITDA
18e ROE (%)
18e Div yield (%)
18e 18e 19e 18e 18e
A-share 002371 CH NAURA TECH CNY 53.26 3,569 99 101.9 64.3 7.2 6.8 53% 51.4 7.1 0.2 002008 CH HAN'S LASER CNY 42.77 6,677 99 21.4 16.4 3.2 5.2 30% 18.5 25.0 1.0 002156 CH TONGFU MICRO CNY 10.05 1,696 13 30.0 19.9 1.4 1.8 39% 10.6 6.2 0.9 603986 CH GIGADEVICE SEMI CNY 110.00 4,566 86 49.5 34.3 10.2 14.5 45% 46.1 30.9 0.3 600584 CH JCET CNY 15.11 3,539 31 32.9 19.9 0.9 2.3 51% 9.4 7.1 0.3 300316 CH ZHEJIANG JINGSHENG CNY 12.46 2,357 34 23.0 17.9 5.0 3.9 25% 19.6 16.6 1.2 002049 CH UNIGROUP GUOXIN CNY 43.04 3,849 133 66.7 54.4 10.6 6.9 22% 41.8 11.1 0.2 300613 CH SHANGHAI FULLHAN CNY 119.85 801 7 40.4 28.0 8.9 5.0 37% 25.9 12.3 0.2 002185 CH TIANSHUI HUATIAN CNY 5.06 1,584 15 18.0 14.4 1.3 1.8 24% 8.3 10.1 0.9 600703 CH SANAN OPTOELECTRONICS CNY 15.94 9,458 95 16.4 12.8 6.0 2.8 27% 10.4 17.5 2.2 600460 CH HANGZHOU SILAN CNY 11.35 2,179 59 61.8 47.2 4.4 5.0 28% 33.2 8.6 0.8 300672 CH GOKE MICRO CNY 51.04 840 16 76.5 38.8 11.5 0.0 54% - 7.1 0.0 300666 CH KONFOONG MATERIALS CNY 47.00 1,518 36 124.2 85.5 13.6 16.0 38% 80.7 13.0 0.0 300458 CH ALL WINNER TECH CNY 23.67 1,153 21 49.2 35.2 5.1 3.6 38% 32.0 7.1 0.0 603005 CH CHINA WAFER LEVEL CSP CNY 20.23 692 6 37.2 24.7 5.9 2.5 44% 14.7 6.6 0.0 300323 CH HC SEMITEK CNY 11.60 1,872 12 15.9 11.6 3.0 2.4 33% 11.9 16.6 0.5 47.8 32.8 6.1 5.0 37% 27.6 12.7 0.5 Offshore 981 HK SMIC HKD 9.04 5,819 31 60.6 60.6 1.7 1.1 36% 9.0 1.6 0.0 1347 HK HUA HONG SEMI HKD 20.00 2,652 27 16.4 14.9 2.9 1.3 12% 8.3 8.9 1.7 522 HK ASM PACIFIC HKD 82.05 4,228 22 11.6 10.8 1.7 2.6 9% 8.0 24.0 3.6 SNPS US SYNOPSYS INC USD 102.14 15,177 108 26.1 24.2 4.9 4.8 10% 21.2 18.4 - CDNS US CADENCE DESIGN USD 47.04 13,303 65 27.9 25.6 6.4 10.1 9% 18.7 40.9 - INTC US INTEL CORP USD 48.43 223,311 1,211 11.7 11.4 3.2 3.0 3% 7.8 22.2 2.5 005930 KS SAMSUNG ELECTRON KRW 47650.00 274,320 340 6.7 6.6 1.2 1.3 3% 2.6 21.2 3.0 000660 KS SK HYNIX INC KRW 80900.00 52,819 262 3.5 3.7 1.4 1.2 -6% 1.9 39.9 2.0 MU US MICRON TECH USD 52.52 60,913 1,576 4.5 4.5 2.0 2.0 -6% 3.1 55.8 0.0 WDC US WESTERN DIGITAL USD 63.24 18,425 291 5.4 5.2 0.9 1.5 5% 4.0 27.6 3.2 TXN US TEXAS INSTRUMENT USD 112.40 109,275 493 19.6 18.1 6.8 10.4 8% 14.0 52.8 2.3 NXPI US NXP SEMICONDUCTO USD 93.14 32,040 917 13.6 11.8 3.4 2.5 19% 11.2 11.0 0.0 6502 JP TOSHIBA CORP JPY 332.00 19,483 47 1.8 12.5 0.6 1.2 -61% 6.6 88.8 0.8 IFNNY US INFINEON TEC-ADR USD 25.44 28,913 4 23.0 20.7 3.3 3.8 10% 10.9 17.9 1.3 STM FP STMICROELECTRONI EUR 17.72 18,725 48 15.3 13.7 1.9 3.0 9% 8.4 20.7 1.3 QCOM US QUALCOMM INC USD 68.71 100,943 816 19.0 16.3 4.5 5.3 20% 12.3 22.8 3.5 AVGO US BROADCOM INC USD 219.03 94,551 887 10.9 10.6 4.6 3.3 7% 9.2 33.5 3.2 2454 TT MEDIATEK TWD 253.50 13,024 52 18.0 14.2 1.7 1.5 24% 11.9 8.5 3.8 NVDA US NVIDIA CORP USD 280.68 170,653 2,855 35.2 31.7 13.1 15.6 14% 30.7 51.1 0.2 AMD US ADV MICRO DEVICE USD 25.17 24,538 2,169 55.4 39.8 3.7 25.3 40% 29.7 52.4 0.0 MRVL US MARVELL TECH GRP USD 20.68 13,519 146 15.0 14.0 5.4 2.2 7% 14.2 15.9 1.2 XLNX US XILINX INC USD 77.83 19,684 171 22.5 20.9 6.9 8.1 16% 19.3 31.9 1.9 2379 TT REALTEK SEMI TWD 144.50 2,389 17 19.0 16.5 1.6 3.2 14% 10.6 17.1 4.2 DLG GY DIALOG SEMICOND EUR 20.21 1,791 15 9.4 11.6 1.2 1.2 -18% 4.1 12.4 0.0 2330 TT TSMC TWD 256.50 216,382 207 18.7 16.6 6.4 4.0 13% 8.9 22.3 3.2 2303 TT UMC TWD 17.15 7,044 29 19.0 18.7 1.4 1.0 7% 3.8 5.2 4.3 3711 TT ASE TECHNOLOGY H TWD 73.80 10,370 17 14.5 12.6 0.8 1.6 20% 6.5 11.5 3.1 AMKR US AMKOR TECH INC USD 8.73 2,091 9 15.6 10.6 0.5 1.1 27% 3.6 7.8 - 6239 TT POWERTECH TWD 88.40 2,241 7 10.2 9.0 1.0 1.7 9% 4.1 15.6 5.8 AMAT US APPLIED MATERIAL USD 43.02 42,288 547 9.7 9.8 2.5 6.4 7% 8.2 53.6 1.4 ASML US ASML HOLDING-NY USD 205.05 88,472 157 30.4 25.1 7.2 6.4 24% 22.8 22.1 0.9 LRCX US LAM RESEARCH USD 173.09 27,276 498 10.9 9.4 2.6 3.9 17% 7.4 29.6 2.4 KLAC US KLA-TENCOR CORP USD 116.21 18,143 172 12.8 12.1 4.1 8.6 5% 9.6 78.1 2.6 Average 18.0 16.5 3.4 4.5 9% 10.7 28.6 2.1
Share prices as at 3 Sep 2018 Source: Company data, Wind, Bloomberg
11
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
The country needs to be more IC self-sufficient
China is the biggest consumer and importer of semiconductors, accounting for USD193bn of
the USD343bn in global sales of integrated circuits last year. China produced 1.9bn
smartphones, 307m PCs and 172m TVs in 2017, representing more than 90%, 70% and 80% of
global supply, respectively. At the same time, we estimate that Huawei and ZTE share over
50% of the global telecom equipment market. So, given current trade relations with the US, the
need for technological independence has never been greater.
Exhibit 6. China consumes over 50% of global IC supply
Exhibit 7. China’s IC demand by application in 2016
Source: Wind Source: CCID
China’s IC imports totalled USD260bn in 2017, up 15% y-o-y, and represented the country’s No.
1 category of imported goods, higher than crude oil, agricultural products, and iron ore. The
value of domestic IC output was RMB541bn (USD80bn) in 2017 and if we include production by
foreign companies in China we estimate the country’s IC self-sufficiency ratio was 42% in 2017,
up from 24% in 2011. However, according to IC insights, a semiconductor research company, if
products manufactured by foreign enterprises in China are excluded, the ratio falls to 13%.
According to the “Made in China 2025” policy roadmap, the self-sufficiency ratio will increase to
49% in 2020 and 75% in 2030, including foreign output in China. We estimate that China’s
50.6%
57.0%59.3% 60.7%
63.8% 65.1%
56.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Global IC sales China IC demand China's market share in demand
(USDbn)
Network communicati
on, 30.6%
Computer, 26.4%
Consumer electronics,
21.9%
Industrial, 12.8%
Auto electronics,
3.9%Others, 4.4%
The rise of China’s IC makers
China is gradually climbing up the IC value chain and is likely to
become a mainstream player in the coming decade
Positive drivers include strong demand, a slowdown in Moore’s Law,
fast-growing domestic investment, and government policy support
We see opportunities in IC design, equipment and OSAT
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
12
domestic IC sales/value output will grow from the current RMB541bn to RMB791bn in 2020 and
RMB1,971bn in 2030, implying a 13% CAGR for 2017-20e and 10% over 2020-30e.
Exhibit 8. China’s major imported product by value: IC is ranked top
Exhibit 9. China’s IC demand, supply and self-sufficiency projection
Import product category in 2017 (USDbn)
Integrated circuits 260.1
Crude oil 162.3
Agricultural product 124.7
Iron ore and concentrates 76.3
Auto 51.0
Plastic 48.5
Copper and concentrates 26.4
Source: Wind Source: China Semiconductor Industry Association, MIIT
Despite this rapid growth, shortages remain in processors/controllers and memory products,
which accounted for 46% and 28% of total import value in 2016. Local suppliers can currently
only provide mid-to-entry level microcontrollers and memory products such as NOR Flash, 2D
NAND Flash and DDR3 DRAM.
Exhibit 10. China’s IC import and export trend
Exhibit 11. China’s IC import by category in 2016
Source: Wind Source: Wind
Moving up the value chain
China’s domestic IC sales increased from RMB193.4bn in 2011 to RMB541.1bn in 2017,
implying a 19% CAGR. This is much faster than the 8% CAGR for China’s IC demand and 6%
CAGR for global IC sales over the same period. The IC design and manufacturing segments are
the key growth drivers, registering CAGRs of 26% and 22%, well ahead of packaging & testing
(12%). The challenge is to move up the value chain.
24% 25% 27%29%
33%36%
41%
49%
75%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2020e 2030e
China IC demand China IC output Self-supply ratio
(RMBbn)
129 120
157 170
192
231 218
230 227
260
24 23 29 33
53
88
61 69
61 67
105 97
128 138 139 144
157 161 166
193
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Import Export Deficit
(USDbn)
Processor and controller, 105 , 46%
Memory, 64 , 28%
Amplifier, 10 , 5%
Others, 49 , 21%
(USDbn)
13
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 12. China IC sales/value output by segment
Exhibit 13. China IC sales/output value y-o-y by segment vs. global IC sales trend
Source: Wind Source: Wind
As illustrated in Exhibit 14, Chinese IC companies can compete in categories such as smartphone
application processors (AP), base band processors (CP) and network processor units (NPU), but
generally have a weak presence in more advanced areas such as microprocessors (MPU), memory,
field-programmable gate array (FPGA), and graphic processing units (GPU).
At the product level, the domestic companies can meet demand for most lower-end IC chips for
surveillance cameras, set top boxes and home networks, radio frequency identification (RFID)
solutions, identify cards, SIM cards, and bank card, which require simple functionality and
limited computing power.
The technology gap with global rivals is clear, even in areas like the smartphone System on
Chip (SoC). Simply put, overseas companies have a far greater ability to customize components
than their Chinese peers. Qualcomm, Apple, MediaTek, and HiSilicon all license ARM’s
instruction set architecture (ISA) for building their own SoC. But they then customize different
components – CPU, GPU, modem, storage, digital signal processor (DSP), image signal
processor (ISP) – which helps to differentiate the features and performance of smartphones.
For example, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 845 processor is based on 64-bit ARMv8-A architecture
but has been customized to optimize the performance and power consumption of its CPU, GPU,
and DSP. Apple’s A11 Bionic processor CPU also customizes ARM’s ISA and has developed its
GPU in-house. However, Chinese companies struggle to compete in this area. In the case
Huawei’s HiSilison’s Kirin 970, its CPU and GPU are also licensed from standard ARMv8-A
(Coretex A73 and A53) architecture but there are no subsequent modifications.
However, we believe this creates opportunities for China to catch up in terms of technical know-
how and upgrade products, supported by a slowdown in Moore’s Law, strong government
support and rapid growth in investment.
12 19 23 24 27 36 53 62 81 105 133
164 207
23 31 40 39 34 45
43 50
60 71
90
113
145
34 51
63 62 50 63
98 104
110
126
138
156
189
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Design Manufacturing Packaging & testing
(RMBbn)
19% CAGR in 2005-17
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
China total China designChina manufacturing China packaging & testingGlobal
The technology gap with
global rivals is clear
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
14
Exhibit 14. China’s presence in key IC product categories
System Device Core IC China market share in 2016
Computing system
Server Microprocessor unit (MPU) 0%
PC Microprocessor unit (MPU) 0%
Industrial application Microcontroller unit (MCU) 2%
General electronic Programmable logic device (PLD) Field-programmable gate array (FPGA) /EPLD
0%
system Digital signal processing device Digital signal processor (DSP) 0%
Telecom equipment Mobile device
Base band processor 18%
Application processor 22%
Embedded MPU 0%
Embedded DSP 0%
Core network equipment Network processor unit (NPU) 15%
Memory DRAM 0%
Semiconductor memory chip NAND Flash 0%
Nor Flash 5%
Display and vision system
High definition / smart TV Graphic processor 5%
Display driver 0%
Source: CISA
15
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Moore’s Law is slowing down
Moore’s Law states that the number of transistors will double per square millimetre every 18 months
due to innovations in design, material and fabrication technology. Based on this thesis, Moore’s Law
is likely to come to an end in the early 2020s, when nodes should shrink to around 5nm. Any further
shrinkage would create huge technical and economic challenges in terms of over-heating and
leakage issues with transistors, high capex and costs, and less performance gain per watt.
There is already evidence of longer node migration cycles for foundries. For Intel, it took around
27 months to migrate from 45nm to 32nm, 28 months from 32nm to 22nm and 30 months from
22nm to 14nm. The company launched 14nm CPU in 2014 but delayed the commercial launch
of 10nm CPU from the end of 2017 to the end of 2019. TSMC’s former chairman, Morris Chang,
commented in 2017 that Moore’s Law may face significant challenges by 2025 and said he
believes processing costs might increase if foundries continue to shrink nodes beyond 2025.
We believe this creates more time for Chinese foundries such as SMIC to narrow the
technology gap with global leaders. We also think this will also lead to more R&D investment in
new materials such as graphene, III-V compound semiconductors and photonics in the coming
decade, areas where China may have a higher chance of becoming a global leader.
On the other hand, the slowdown in Moore’s Law suggests that the technical challenges are
growing exponentially, which may make it more difficult for Chinese vendors to close the gap
with global leaders. This is why R&D investment and operational excellence remain the key
areas of focus for Chinese companies.
China’s role in the development of technical standards such as 5G, AI and IoT
China is becoming more active in setting technical standards in emerging industry applications
such as 5G, AI, IoT, and autonomous driving. This deeper level of involvement means more
influence and closer collaboration with semiconductor supply chain partners, which over time
should enable leading Chinese companies to move up the value chain from software or system
design to the IC design universe.
For example, in the area of telecoms the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), a
collaboration between groups of telecommunications standards associations, has chosen polar
coding as the official coding scheme for the control channels of the 5G New Radio eMBB
interface. Polar coding is the standard supported by Huawei, while Qualcomm and others
support a standard known as LDPC. This provides Huawei with a competitive edge for Huawei
in designing 5G baseband ICs. Elsewhere, in April 2018 Alibaba acquired C-Sky, a Chinese
company engaged in the design of low power embedded 32-bit CPUs applied in IoT and cloud
systems. This creates synergies for Alibaba as C-Sky’s CPU could be integrated with Alibaba’s
AliOS. We discuss China’s presence in AI in a later section.
Exhibit 15. Logic IC technology roadmap
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
TSMC 28nm HKMG 20nm Planar 16nm FinFET 10nm FinFET 7nm FinFET 5nm FinFET
Samsung 28nm PolySION 28nm HKMG 20nm Planar 14nm FinFET 10nm FinFET 7nm FinFET
Global Foundries 28nm PolySION 20nm Planar 14nm FinFET 12nm FinFET 7nm FinFET
Intel 22nm Planar 14nm FinFET 10nm FinFET
SMIC 28nm PolySION 20nm Planar 14nm FinFET
Source: TechInsights, Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
China is becoming more active
in setting technical standards
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
16
Investment cycle to boost competitive edge
China’s total IC capex in 2016 grew 31% y-o-y to RMB94.5bn (USD14.2bn), vs. 5% growth in
global IC capex. As a result, China’s share of global IC capex increased from 7% in 2011 to
21% in 2016. As at 2016, China had 72 wafer fabs operating on over 6 inches technology
platforms, 10 fabs of 12 inches, and 20 fabs of 8 inches.
According to IC Insights, aggregate capex by Chinese companies will increase from USD7.9bn
in 2017 to USD11bn in 2018, exceeding the total investment by European and Japanese
companies for the first time. The growth is being driven by capacity expansion for DRAM and
NAND flash memory companies such as Hefei Changxin, Wuhan Xinxin/Yangtze Memory,
Fujian Jinhua, in addition to foundries like SMIC and Huali. This substantial level of investment
helps Chinese companies attract talent, as shown by the number of experienced executives
from Taiwan working for leading Chinese IC companies.
Exhibit 16. China and global IC capex trend
Exhibit 17. China headquartered semi capex vs. Japan and Europe
Source: Wind, China Semiconductor Industry Association Source: IC Insights
Supportive government policies
As mentioned earlier, the Chinese government is offering the industry a great deal of policy
support. For example, the National IC Industry Development Guidelines in June 2014 contained
a number of targets for 2020, including: 1) to keep the annual industry IC sales growth rate
above 20% y-o-y during 2015-20 and reach over RMB870bn in 2020; 2) to reach tier-one level
in IC design worldwide in mobile smart devices, network communication, cloud computing,
Internet of Things and big data; 3) to achieve scale production in 16/14nm ICs by 2020, vs.
32/28nm in 2015; and 4) to achieve global standards in packaging and testing and enter the
global supply chain for key equipment and materials.
Then, in May 2015, the State Council released the “Made in China 2025” plan, which laid out a
detailed technology roadmap for various industries, including IC, covering design,
manufacturing packaging, equipment and materials. We will discuss each segment in detail in
the following section.
5.2 7.2
4.7 5.5 9.4 10.4 11.5
14.2
25.9
56.5
65.8
58.7 57.8
64.6 64.8 68.0
20%
13%
7%
9%
16% 16%
18%
21%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
-
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
China IC capex Global IC capex Chnia's share (right)
(USDbn)
6.6
7.57.0
9.5
10.7
1.52.2
3.9
7.9
11.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e
Japan and Europe
(USDbn)
The Chinese government is
offering the industry a great
deal of policy support
17
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 18. IC industry development roadmap according to the “Made in China 2025” plan
Source: MIIT
The National IC Investment Fund
Aside from policy support, China’s government is also providing large amounts of capital for the
domestic IC industry. In September 2014, the National IC Industry Fund – known as the Big
Fund – was established with initial capital of RMB138.7bn raised from state-owned enterprises
(SOEs) and the government; investors included the Ministry of Finance, China Tobacco, China
Mobile, China Development Bank, and China Electronics Corporation. The fund mainly invests
in leading private and public listed domestic IC companies, with the focus on manufacturing and
design which accounts for 65% and 17% of the fund’s total investment, respectively.
The Big Fund targets industry leaders across the value chain to help finance advanced capacity
expansion and strategic acquisitions. As at the end of 2017, the first phase of Big Fund financing had
invested in 62 projects, of which 23 are listed companies or affiliates of listed companies. A second
phase of investment by the fund is underway, with funding expected to be in the range of RMB150-
200bn. The aim is to broaden sector coverage to applications for smart vehicles, AI, IoT, and 5G.
2015 2020 2025 2030
Manufacturing
Packaging
Design
65-40nm 28nm 20-14nm In line with global peers
0.2mn wafers/month (12') 0.7mn wafers/month (12') 1mn wafers/month (12') 1.5mn wafers/month (12')
28nm IC design 20-14nm IC design In line with global peers
Market size of US$20bn, 20% global share
Market size of US$40bn, 25% global share
Market size of US$60bn, 35% global share
Market size of US$10bn, 35% global share Market size of US$20bn, 45% global share
Multi-chip package (MCP) 3D Package Multi-component IC (MCO)
Exhibit 19. Major Big Fund investments in listed companies
Company Related Listco Ticker Investment Ownership Comment
(RMBm)
Design
May-15 Nine Star
002180 CH 500 4.0% To finance the acquisition of Static Control Components Jun-15 Goke Microelectronics
300672 CH 400 15.8% Pre-IPO investment
Nov-15 Sanechips ZTE 000063 CH 2,400 24.0% Invest in IC design unit of ZTE Aug-17 Giga Device
603986 CH 1,450 11.0% Through share transfer from existing shareholders
Nov-17 Goodix
603160 CH 2,829 6.65% Through share transfer from existing shareholders Jan-18 Jingjia
Microelectronics
300474 CH < 1,170 n/a Pending approval. Jingjia specializes in GPU development
Manufacturing
Feb-15 SMIC
981 HK 2,700 15.1% New share issuance 2016-17 SMIC North SMIC 981 HK 9,970 32.0% Focus on 45-28nm IC on 12' wafer Jan-18 SMIC South SMIC 981 HK 5,963 27.0% Focus on 14nm IC manufacturing Jan-18 Hua Hong
1347 HK 2,520 18.9% To issue new shares
Jan-18 Hua Hong (Wuxi) Hua Hong 1347 HK 3,289 29.0% To finance the investment in 12' production line Nov-16 Navtech
300456 CH 1,048 9.1% Through private placement to finance 8' MEMS fab
Packaging
Jan-15 JCET
600584 CH 2,031 9.5% To finance the acquisition of STATS ChipPAC Dec-15 Hua Tian (Xi'An) Hua Tian 002185 CH 500 27.2% Subsidiary of listco Dec-17 China Wafer Level CSP
603005 CH 680 9.3% Bought shares from Engineering and IP Advanced Technologies
Jan-Feb 18 Tongfu Microelectronics
002156 CH 2,561 21.7% Through private placement to acquire AMD’s packaging facilities Equipment
Feb-16 Naura
002371 CH 600 7.5% Through private placement to acquire North Microelectronics Jun-15 Chang Chuan Technology 300604 CH n/a 7.3% Pre-IPO investment Materials
Oct-17 Yoke Technology
002409 CH 550 n/a To finance acquisition on special gas company Dec-17 Zhong Ju Xin Technology Zhejiang
Juhua 600160 CH 390 39.0% To form JV in electronic material development
Others
Jun-15 San’an Optoelectronics
600703 CH 4,839 11.3% Through share transfer; Leading LED supplier Jul-16 BDStar Navigation
002151 CH 1,500 11.5% Through private placement; Satellite navigation
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
18
Apart from the central government, a number of municipal governments are also raising capital
and forming IC investment funds. The total size of these funds – including contributions from
phase one of the Big Fund – amounts to RMB465bn.
Each municipal government has a different focus. For example, Hubei and Anhui are
developing IC manufacturing due to their exposure to start-up memory foundries such as
Yangtze Memory Technologies (NAND flash), Wuhan Xinxin (NOR flash), and Hefei Changxin
(DRAM). Guangdong focuses on design and packaging, while Fujian intends to spend 70% of
its RMB50bn fund on III-V compound semiconductors such as Gallium nitride (GaN), Gallium
arsenide (GaAs), and Indium nitride (InN).
Exhibit 20. China’s IC investment fund map
Source: SemiInsights, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Challenges remain
Despite the considerable amount of progress made in this industry in the last few years, China
still has several hurdles to overcome. We highlight two in particular:
Restrictions on equipment imports and cross-border M&A. Based on the Wassenaar
Arrangement that covers 42 states, there are export controls on certain types of semiconductor
equipment and IC components to China, such as advanced lithography equipment and related
key components, high-performance CPU, FPGA, DSP and MOSFET, among others. In addition,
Chinese companies face growing difficulties in acquiring overseas semiconductor companies,
due to concerns about intellectual property transfer. As a result, China has to rely more on self-
development in order to compete with global peers.
HAINAN
YUNNAN GUANGXI
GUIZHOU
GUANGDONG
FUJIAN
HUNANJIANGXI
QINGHAI
XINJIANG
XIZANG
(TIBET) SICHUAN
HONG KONG
HEILONGJIANG
INNER MONGOLIA
JILIN
LIAONING
BEIJING
HEBEITIANJIN
SHANDONG
JIANGSU
ANHUI
SHANGHAI
ZHEJIANG
HENAN
HUBEI
SHAANXIGANSU
NINGXIA
SHANXI
CHONGQING
RMB10bn
RMB200m/year
RMB10bn
RMB71bn
RMB50bn
RMB50bn
Xia Men RMB16bn
RMB15bn
RMB32bn
RMB250m
RMB30bn
RMB12bn
RMB30bn
Big fund
RMB138.72bn
Total investment
RMB465.17bn
Local governments
investing in the
semiconductor industry
19
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Semiconductor supply chain. China has limited exposure to semiconductor processing
material, including raw silicon wafer, mask, photoresist, electric gases, chemical-mechanical
planarization (CMP) materials, and packaging substrate. This means there is a heavy reliance
on imports. For silicon wafers, China is only able to make solar-grade 6-inch silicon wafer and
has just trialled the production of 8/12-inch. Domestic technology also trails in the area of
electronic design automation (EDA).
Exhibit 21. Unsuccessful M&A deals involving Chinese companies
Date Acquirer Target company Target company's business
Jul-15 Unigroup Micron DRAM, NAND Flash Oct-15 Unigroup Western Digital SSD, HDD, NAND Flash Oct-15 Unigroup Powertech Technology IC Packaging and testing Dec-15 Unigroup SPIL IC Packaging and testing Dec-15 Unigroup ChipMOS IC Packaging and testing Nov-16 Canyon Bridge Lattice Semiconductor FPGA Dec-16 Fujian Grand Chip Investment Fund Aixtron MOCVD, PECVD Aug-17 GigaDevice ISSI SRAM, DRAM
Source: Company data
In the next section we highlight areas where we believe Chinese companies have a competitive
edge or are well positioned to gain market share.
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
20
We now identify the three parts of the semiconductor value chain where we believe Chinese
companies are gaining strength, implying compelling growth opportunities for A-share listed
semiconductor companies.
Opportunity 1: IC design: AI and NOR flash memory
Fabless IC companies that focus on design, engineering and marketing are playing a more
important role in the industry these days. According to IC Insights, the revenue share of global
fabless IC companies has increased from 18% in 2007 to 27% in 2017, led by Qualcomm,
Broadcom, MediaTek, AMD, Nvidia and Marvell.
China is catching up at a rapid pace. Ten Chinese companies were ranked in the world’s top 50
IC design companies last year, up from one in 2009. Their market share in fabless IC sales has
increased from 5% in 2010 to 11% in 2017 at the expense of rivals in the US and Europe.
If we include output by foreign companies in the country, China’s IC design industry revenue
increased from RMB4.0bn in 2009 to USD30.7bn in 2017 (a CAGR of 29%) and its global
market share has expanded from 7% in 2009 to 30% in 2017. The total number of IC design
companies in China increased from 582 in 2010 to 1,380 in 2017.
Exhibit 22. Market share of fabless company IC sales by company headquarter locations
Exhibit 23. China and global IC design revenue comparison
Source: IC Insights Source: IC Insights, CSIA, HSBC Qianhai Securities
4%
69%
17%
5%
4%
1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Other countries (mainly Broadcom)
US
Taiwan
China
Europe
Japan
2017 2010
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Global IC design China IC design China's market share
(USDbn)
Three opportunities
China is catching up rapidly in the area of IC design
Semi equipment sales are set to grow rapidly in 2018; China is
emerging as the key driver
Market share gains in packaging and testing
China is catching up at a
rapid pace
21
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 25. Number of IC design companies in China
Exhibit 26. China’s IC design revenue share by industry
Source: CSIA Source: CSIA
The number of Chinese IC design start-ups is also encouraging and some are among the top-
tier players in emerging industries such as AI and block chain. AI chips are mainly used in cloud
data centres and user devices (smartphones, auto, computer vision), which are used for
machine learning (training) and inference. By technology, AI processors includes CPU, GPU,
DSP, FPGA and ASIC. According to Forest and Sullivan, the global AI chip market will grow
from USD5.2bn in 2017 to USD15.3bn in 2020, implying a CAGR of 43.3%.
Recent developments at the company level include:
The neural processing unit (NPU) of Huawei’s Kirin 970 chip, which was developed to
power its latest flagship smartphone Mate 10, is licensed from Cambricon Technologies, a
successful Chinese start-up specialising in AI chips.
In May 2018 Cambricon also launched a cloud-based machine learning processor called
MLU100 and a mobile device NPU 1M based on TSMC’s 7nm technology. Cambricon is the
first company in the world to have AI processors operating in both cloud and devices.
Beijing-based Horizon Robotics has launched an embedded computer vision processor
called Sunrise1.0 and Journey1.0 targeting autonomous driving and smart cities.
Deephi Tech, another Beijing-based company, has developed a proprietary Deep Learning
Processing Unit (DPU) platform that aims to simplify and accelerate deep learning
applications. The company was recently acquired by US AI giant Xilinx.
582 534 569
632 681
736
1,362 1,380
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Telecommunication45%
Consumer electronics
21%
Multi-media12%
Smart card9%
PC7%
Analog4%
Power2% GPS
0%
Exhibit 24. Top 10 IC design companies in China by revenue
Company 2017 revenue Major business (RMBbn)
HiSilicon 36.1 Smartphone, baseband, set top box, camera, display, home network, IoT Unigroup 11.0 Smartphone application, baseband processor, RF, IoT, CMOS, TV chipset Sanechips 6.6 Smartphone modem, multimedia application, image, power and PA chip, wired network Huada Semiconductor 5.2 Smart card, MCU, RFID, Analog, display Zhixin Microelectronics 4.5 Smart chip used in power, telecom, environmental, finance Goodix 3.7 Fingerprint Silan 2.7 MCU, Power management, LED driver, Power Driver Module, Digital Audio, MEMS Focal Tech (Shenzhen) 2.8 Touch IC Galaxycore 2.5 Image sensor Vimicro 2.1 Surveillance camera SOC, neural processing unit, HD digital image module
Source: CCID, Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
22
Exhibit 27. AI chip supply chain
Inference on device
Mobile ADAS Computer vision Natural language processing Virtual reality
Apple Mobileye Movidius Chipintelli Microsoft
Qualcomm NVIDIA Unisound
Cambricon Horizon
Samsung Robotics
MTK
Inference on cloud
GPU FPGA ASIC
NVIDIA Altera Google TPU
AMD Xilinx
Training
GPU ASIC FPGA
NVIDIA Google TPU Deephi (Xilinx)
Cambricon
Note: Chinese companies are highlighted in red
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Progress is also being made in blockchain technology. Chinese companies such as Bitmain and
Canaan, which specialise in crypto currency mining machines, had market shares of 67% and
21% in the fabless ASIC bitcoin mining equipment shipments in 2017, according to Frost &
Sullivan. The consulting firm also forecasts that the size of the blockchain hardware market will
increase from RMB19.3bn in 2017 to RMB98.5bn in 2020, a CAGR of 98.5%. ASIC-based
hardware accounted for 71% of the blockchain hardware market in 2017.
ASIC chips are gaining popularity in AI due to their computing performance, energy efficiency,
and the fact they can be customised. Frost & Sullivan projects the size of the addressable
market of ASIC-based AI chips will surge from USD1bn in 2017 to USD4.6bn in 2020, and will
account for 30% of the total market in 2020, up from 19% in 2017.
Exhibit 28. Global AI chip market size Exhibit 29. Market size of blockchain hardware
Source: Company data, Frost & Sullivan Source: Company data, Frost & Sullivan
We think the ultimate aim of Chinese companies is to create an eco-system covering computing
architecture, processors, and application development platforms. To do this we believe it is
critical to succeed in the AI processor market, as shown by the dominance of NVIDIA’s CUDA
and Volta architecture and GPU (used by Tesla, DGX, and Titan), and Google’s Tensorflow
platform and TPU processor.
0.0
1.0
4.6
0.3
1.6
3.1
0.2
1.9
5.5
0.1
0.7
2.1
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
2012 2017 2020e
ASIC FPGA GPU CPU
(USDbn)15.3
5.2
0.6
52% CAGR
43% CAGR
2.67.3
14.6
24.028.6
0.8
1.4
2.9
5.6
6.9
0.1 0.6 1.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Total blockchain hardwareNon-ASIC based blockchain hardwareASIC-based blockchain hardware
8.7
17.5
29.6
35.6(RMBbn)
3.4
60% CAGR2017-20
205% CAGR2013-17
23
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
The reality is that despite some encouraging proprietary developments in AI and blockchain, the
technology gap with leading overseas fabless companies such as Qualcomm, Nvidia, AMD and
MediaTek remains wide. We believe IP licensing and customization, plus the recruitment of
talent and education can help Chinese companies catch up.
IP licensing plus customization
There’s a growing trend for China to localize core IPs in PCs, servers and smartphones ICs via
joint ventures with global leaders. For example, ARM sold a 51% stake in ARM Technology
China to a group of Chinese investors for USD775m in June 2018. While the main aim of the
investment is to acquire the sales and distribution business in China, we believe it also creates
a closer tie-up with ARM. This should help Chinese companies better customize ARM IP and
ultimately build their own IP portfolio with the help of ARM’s platform. As discussed above,
Qualcomm and Apple currently have far better customization skills when it comes to ARM
architecture but we think Chinese vendors such as HiSilicon will catch up over time.
Another example of this trend is AMD’s JV with Tianjin Haiguang Advanced Technology
Investment (THATIC) to develop x86 based server CPU technology. AMD will license its x86 IP
to the JV and the Chinese partner will do some customization. The JV started producing
Dhyana series server CPUs in July 2018, based on AMD’s ZEN architecture.
Recruiting talent, strengthening domestic education
Chinese memory companies have been offering attractive compensation and incentive
schemes in order to recruit talent, especially from Taiwan. Around 450 employees from Inotera
and Nanya Technology have joined Chinese memory companies in the past two years. The
chairman of Yangtze Memory, Mr. Gao Qiguan, was previously the general manager of Nanya
Technology and Inotera, and the global executive vice president of Unigroup, Mr. Sun Shiwei,
was the former deputy chairman and CEO of UMC.
China is also enhancing advanced IC education in order to enlarge its domestic talent pool. The IC
industry requires people with a wide range of educational backgrounds, including computer science,
communication engineering, software engineering, electrical engineering, physics, chemistry,
material science, and mechanical engineering. China recruited 589,800 post-graduates and 77,252
PHDs in 2016, up 64% and 33% compared to 2007, the highest number worldwide.
Exhibit 30. Comparison of major AI chips
Chip type
Pros Cons Training rank
Inference rank
CPU General-purpose, already in servers and PVs, sufficient for inferencing
Series-processing is less efficient than parallel-processing N/A N/A
GPU Highly parallel, high performance, uses popular AI framework (such as CUDA)
Inefficient unless fully utilized 1 3
FPGA Reconfigurable functionality, good for constantly evolving workloads, efficient
Difficult to program, lower performance versus GPUs, no major AI framework
2 2
ASIC High computing performance, highly energy efficient, fully customizable
Expensive, requires high volumes to be practical, quickly outdated, less flexible
3 1
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
24
Exhibit 31. China’s post-graduate and PHD recruitment
Exhibit 32. IC industry recruitment by category in China in 2017
Source: Ministry of Education Source: White Paper of China IC Industry Talents
Memory – gaining presence in DRAM, NAND and NOR flash
China is in the process of ramping up DRAM and NAND flash memory production lines and
gaining share in NOR Flash memory.
NAND flash
Yangtze Memory, an entity invested in by Unigroup, the National IC Fund and the Hubei
municipal government, is a pioneer in developing 3D NAND Flash in China. The company was
established at the end of 2016 and is the parent company of Wuhan Xinxin (XMC). XMC is a
major NAND and NOR flash memory foundry in China, which is jointly developing 32L 3D
NAND with Spansion. The company has also partnered with the Institute of Microelectronics of
Chinese Academy of Sciences in 3D NAND R&D. To speed its development, the company is
recruiting experienced management and talent from leading global memory companies.
Total investment amounts to USD24bn, with phase one capacity of 300,000 pieces of
wafer/month (12-inch), in the range of 14-20nm. The company started equipment installation in
April 2018 and expects to start producing 32 layer 3D NAND in 4Q18, with initial orders being
for 8GB USB flash cards. The company also plans to mass produce 128Gb and 64 layer 3D
NAND from 2019.
Exhibit 33. 2D and 3D NAND flash node migration roadmap
Source: TechInsights, HSBC Qianhai Securities
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Post-graduate (LHS) PHD (RHS)
('000) ('000)
R&D, 58%
Sales and customer
support, 18%
Foundry, 3%
Packaging & testing, 6%
General purpose,
10%
Others, 5%
Toshiba
Western Digital
Samsung
Micron/Intel
SK Hynix
Yangtze
Memory
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
2D 19nm 16nm 14nm
3D V-NAND 32L (20nm) 48L (20nm) 64L (20nm) 96/128/192L
2D
3D
19nm 15nm 1st 15nm 2nd
48L (19nm) 64L (19nm) 96/128L
2D 16nm
3D 64T (20nm) 96T (20nm), 128T
2D
3D
16nm 14nm
32T (40nm)
36L (31nm) 48L 72L 96L-128L
3D 32L 64L
25
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
DRAM
Fujian Jinhua, Hefei Changxin, and Ziguang Guoxin Microelectronics are the leaders in
developing DRAM in China. Fujian Jinhua licenses 20nm DRAM IPs from UMC and intends to
start mass production in 4Q18. Total investment amounts to RMB37bn, with phase 1 capacity of
60,000 pieces/month (12-inch). Ziguang Guoxin is a fabless IC design house. In 2015 it moved
into DRAM by acquiring the Xi’an subsidiary of Qimonda, a memory company that is an affiliate
of German tech company Infineon. Ziguang Guoxin is currently able to mass produce DDR3
DRAM (25nm process node), and plans to complete the development of DDR4 in 2018. We
discuss Hefei Changxin in a later section of this report.
Exhibit 34. DRAM migration schedule by major DRAM vendors
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
NOR flash: favourable demand/supply outlook
Memory can be divided into volatile and non-volatile, based on the dependence on active power
connection to function and persistence in storage. Non-volatile memory, which does not lose
stored data when the power is off, includes flash and read-only memory (ROM). The prevailing
form is flash memory. Based on a structure of interconnections between memory cells, flash
memory is divided into NOR and NAND. NOR generally has low density, faster read speed, and
good endurance, while NAND has high density, fast write and erase speeds and lower bit cost.
Depending on interfaces, NOR flash can be further categorized into serial and parallel types.
Volatile memory mainly refers to random access memory (RAM). Based on the design
architecture, RAM can be divided into dynamic (DRAM) and static (SRAM) type. RAM is used to
temporarily hold data. DRAM uses transistors and capacitors in an array of repeating circuits
(where each circuit is one bit), whereas SRAM uses several transistors in a circuit to form one
bit. SRAM offers a faster data input/output rate and is less sensitive than DRAM to disturbance
such as electrical noise. It also does not require refresh, a process involving the periodic
reading of information from a certain section of the memory and the immediate rewriting of that
information to the same area without making any changes. But SRAM is generally more
expensive than DRAM.
DRAM and NAND flash are the primary memory type, with their market size reaching
USD72.8bn and USD47.2bn in 2017, accounting for 58% and 38% of the global memory market
in terms of value. The NOR flash market reached USD2.0bn in 2017, representing only 1% of
the total memory market.
1H14 2H14 1H15 2H15 1H16 2H16 1H17 2H17 1H18 2H18
Samsung
SK Hynix
Micron
25nm 20nm 20nm 17nm
25nm 21nm 18nm
25nm 20nm 17nm
Hefei
Changxin
Fujian
Jinhua
2019e 2020e
19nm
20nm
17nm
18nm
Volatile memory mainly
refers to random access
memory (RAM)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
26
Exhibit 35. Memory product classifications Exhibit 36. Market size of memory industry in 2017
Source: Company data Source: DramExchange, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Exhibit 37. Comparison of NOR and NAND flash
NOR flash NAND flash
Interface in NOR allows random access for reading NAND allows only page access
reading/writing
Fast read and random access times Higher density
Higher endurance and data retention Higher storage capacity
Features Reliable code and data storage Fast write and erase speeds
Low standby power Lower bit cost
Lower density and wrote speed Higher read latency
Code storage in PCs, feature phones, USB drives, SSD in tablets, smartphones,
Applications consumer electronics, PCs, servers, etc.
set-top boxes, autos, industrials, etc.
Density Up to 4Gb Up to 1TB
Node up to 45nm up to 12nm
Source: Industry data
Demand for NOR flash is expanding
NOR Flash’s low read latency characteristics allow it to be widely used in read only, code
storage/execution applications such as PC BIOS systems, feature phones, consumer
electronics, autos, TV set-top boxes, surveillance cameras, and industrial machines.
The size of the NOR flash market declined from a peak of USD8.6bn in 2006 to a trough of
USD1.5bn in 2015, but has started to pick up again in the past two years. This is primarily due
to: 1) the decline in the unit selling price. According to WSTS, the average selling price of NOR
flash has fallen from USD2.32 in 2006 to USD0.34 in 2017, an annualized decline of 16%; and
2) a structural change in demand. NOR flash was widely used in feature phones but has lost
ground in the smartphone cycle since 2007.
Smartphones require much higher data storage capacity than feature phones, and also have
more functions and a slimmer form factor, making NAND flash the preferred choice. But since
2016 NOR flash has started to pick up in both volume and price thanks to demand from new
applications such as AMLOD panels, touch and display driver integration (TDDI) and advanced
driver assistance system (ADAS), gaming consoles, as well as limited new supply.
Memory
Non-volatile Volatile
FlashOTP
ROM
EPROM
EEPROM
Nor
FlashNAND
Flash
ParallelSerial
DRAM SRAM
Red box represents the GigaDevice’ product offering
DRAM, 72.8, 58%
NAND Flash, 47.2,
38%
NOR Flash, 2.0, 1%
Others, 3.5 , 3%
(USDbn)
27
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 38. Global market size of NOR Flash memory
Exhibit 39. NOR flash shipments and ASP worldwide
Source: WSTS Source: WSTS
Looking ahead, we highlight the key demand drivers for NOR flash:
AMOLED panels: smartphones
The Mura effect, which refers to each pixel not being able to output colours identically in a
display, is an issue for active-matrix organic light-emitting diode (AMOLED) panels. It results in
poor colour and brightness consistency from one pixel to the next. Liquid crystal display (LCD)
is generally better at minimizing the Mura effect. To ensure consistency in product quality,
manufacturers have to set up automated inspection and repair processes. Codes that
compensate for possible defects in each panel are stored in a separate, implanted NOR flash
memory as it is not an economical solution to integrate a de-Mura function into an AMOLED
driver IC. That said, NOR flash has become an essential part of AMOLED. A typical high-
definition OLED smartphone panel contains an 8-16MB NOR flash chip.
We see an increase in the penetration rate of OLED smartphones in the coming years. OLED
offers several advantages over LCD display: 1) slimmer form factor without backlight as it is
self-emissive; 2) low power consumption; and 3) more vibrant colour, deeper blacks and
brighter whites and better contract ratio. More smartphone models have recently started using
OLED display, including Vivo X21, OPPO R15, and Xiaomi 8. Apple is also planning to launch
two OLED iPhone models (5.8- and 6.5-inch) in 4Q18, vs. one model in 2017, according to
Appleinsider.com. HSBC’s Korean technology team forecasts that the global smartphone OLED
penetration rate will increase from 23% in 2017 to 29% in 2018e and 32% in 2019e. This
suggests a y-o-y unit growth rate of 30% in 2018 and 15% in 2019.
On the supply side, we forecast OLED monthly production capacity will growth from 164,000
sheets in 2017 to 327,000 in 2018 and 494,000 in 2019, with a large part of the incremental
supply coming from Samsung and Chinese vendors such as BOE, Tianma, China Start
Optoelectronics Technology (CSOT), Visonox, and EverDisplay. The diversification of OLED
supply will help to reduce the cost of OLED panels and accelerated adoption rates.
-35%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Market size Yoy
(USDmn)
-
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Shipment volume (LHS) ASP (RHS)
(mn) (USD)
We see an increase in the
penetration rate of OLED
smartphones
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
28
Exhibit 40. Global OLED smartphone adoption rate
Exhibit 41. OLED capacity expansion trend
Source: HSBC Research Source: Company data, HSBC Research
Touch display driver integration (TDDI)
Integrating display and touch driver solutions was introduced by Synaptics in 2015. It combines
the display and touch driver IC into one chip, which simplifies design and improves the device’s
reliability. TDDI has other advantages, including: 1) preventing electrical display noise from
interfering with touch sensing; 2) lower BOM (bill of materials). The in-cell display driver IC and
touch sensor are mounted on the thin film transistor (TFT) glass, which enables one flexible
printed circuit (FPC) for interfacing with display and touch. This means TDDI requires one less
FPC and IC than a conventional design; and 3) a slim form factor as it has narrower borders to
support narrow bezels, reflecting the popularity of bezel-less, full-screen phones.
WitsView, a market research company, expects bezel-less phones’ penetration to surge from 8.7%
in 2017 to 44.6% in 2018 and 92.1% in 2021. Meanwhile, IHS forecasts that TDDI chip demand will
grow from 220m in 2017 to 280m in 2018 and 410m in 2022, implying a 13% CAGR over 2017-22.
We estimate TDDI’s penetration rate will increase from 15% in 2017 to 24% in 2022. TDDI is mainly
used in Android models such as Huawei P, Honor, the Nova series, and Vivo X series.
The program to run display and touch drivers is quite large, especially for notched full screen as
a more sophisticated algorithm is required to calculate the shaped corner areas’ parameters.
This means that an external NOR flash memory is needed to store the code for TDDI. The
memory density is around 4-16MB.
Exhibit 42. Illustration of TDDI and discrete touch/display solution
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities
10%
13%
20%
23% 23%
28%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e
Global OLED smartphone shipmentGlobal OLED smartphone adoption ratio
(mn)
33 55 143
189 239 269
--
10
25
45 60
1
4
54
145
249
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Samsung flexible OLED capacity LGD OLED capacity China flexible OLED capacity
3356
157
269
578('000 sheets/month, 6G eqiuiv.)
430
Main Board
Display FPC
Display Driver
Touch IC
Touch FPC
Touch panel
Display panel
Full In-cell Panel
TDDI
Display FPC
Main Board
Connector
TDDI solutionDiscrete display and touch driver
29
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 43. TDDI chip demand forecast Exhibit 44. Full screen phone penetration
forecast
Source: IHS, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: WitsView
Automotive: growing density and wider applications drive growth
NOR flash was initially used in vehicles’ radio systems due to its low density and reliability. With
the growing electrification trend, more auto components need high-performing memory to
improve the user experience and facilitate autonomous driving functions. NOR flash’s fast read
nature (up to 500MB per second) boots up a vehicle’s operating system and turns on functions
(such as infotainment and ADAS) instantly. NOR flash also offers a more stable performance in
harsh environments such as extreme temperatures than NAND and DRAM. In addition, its
longevity makes it ideal for use in dashboard display, front/rear cameras, and the power train,
and may also suit light detection and ranging (LIDAR) in the future.
Different auto electronics systems require varied types and densities of memory. NOR flash
is preferred for powertrain systems as it known for reliability and endurance. It requires
memory to work at extreme temperatures (from -40 to +125 degree Celsius). Memory
enhances conventional engines and enables new types of engines such as electric
vehicles. NOR flash also improves transmission shift control, start/stop and advanced
thermal schemes.
Communication systems need multi-chip packages (MCP), which combine more than one
type of memory technology. It needs to fit into tight spaces in communication modules and
integrate with smartphones and other wireless devices.
For infotainment and cluster systems, DRAM NOR and NAND and MCP are all needed to
meet a variety of applications. NAND is used for storage such as contacts, maps, and
media, while DRAM supports the bandwidth demands associated with high-resolution
video. NOR flash provides head-up displays.
For ADAS, multiple types of memory are needed to complete three stage computing
performance (sense, perceive, and act). Functions such as night vision, traffic sign
recognition, adaptive cruise control, and parking assistance demand memory with the
highest performance standards.
Central control operating systems are currently equipped with 128-256MB NOR flash memory,
while driving recorder, infotainment, GPS, and ADAS functions (such as all-round vision, lane
departure warning system, automatic braking system) generally need 512MB NOR flash or SLC
NAND, plus 1-2GB DRAM.
Cypress Semiconductors, a leading US company, expects ADAS inclusion in mid-end vehicle
models to be the key drivers for NOR flash memory in the coming years. The company
forecasts that ADAS system shipments will increase from 133m in 2017 to 280mn in 2021.
4
50
220
280
320
350380
410
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e 2021e 2022e
TDDI TDDI Penetration (RHS)
(mn)
8.7%
44.6%
71.6%
87.7%92.1%
2.4%
15.7%
22.6%25.1% 26.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2017 2018e 2019e 2020e 2021e
Bezel less phone penetration Shaped cutting phone penetration
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
30
Accordingly, NOR Flash revenue should increase from USD58m in 2017 to USD121m in 2021,
a 20% CAGR.
Cypress claims to have a 65% market share in the automotive NOR flash in 2017. Macronix is
also increasing its exposure to auto, industrial and medical segments but the contribution from
consumer electronics fell from 31% in 1Q16 to 24% in 1Q18.
Exhibit 46. NOR flash market size in ADAS system
Exhibit 47. Macronix NOR flash revenue breakdown
Source: Cypress Semiconductor Source: Company data
IoT the long-term driver
IoT systems contain an SoC chip comprising a microcontroller, RF, memory, sensor and other
components. IoT chips generally need to be low cost, small in size with low power consumption,
low density, fast read/execution and secure access to handle frequent communications between
various types of devices.
An SoC normally has embedded non-volatile memory (NVM) such as Flash (eFlash) as it saves
energy and time to copy code from external memory, which is widely applied in wearable
devices. NOR flash is a preferred choice of eFlash due to its low cost, fast read and reliability.
NOR flash offers lower cost for densities below 512MB, while NAND flash has bit cost
advantage for higher density memory. External memory is also needed for devices that need
high density, such as smart homes, e-readers, home gateways, set-top boxes, and WiFi routers.
Devices that need to execute in place (XIP) functionality require code execution directly from
Flash memory without shadowing it to DRAM. NOR flash is a more robust technology that can
reliably operate without the need for Error Correction Code (ECC). NAND flash requires a
controller to manage the operation, including detecting and correcting errors in random memory
location, managing blocks of that memory that have errors in them and relocating or mapping
locations with errors to new locations that are error-free.
The IoT is still in the early stage of growth. Ericsson forecasts that the number of connected IoT
devices will reach 19.8bn by 2023, up from 7bn in 2017, implying a CAGR of 19%. GSMA
projects a total of USD1.8trn in IoT application service revenue by 2026, led by smart homes
(USD441bn), consumer electronics (USD276bn), connected vehicles (USD273bn) and
connected industry (USD164bn).
88
133
280
28
58
121
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2015 2017 2021e
ADAS systems shipment (LHS) NOR Flash market size in ADAS (RHS)
(USDm)(mn)
31%
34%
36%
34%
29%
29%
31%
27%
24%
22%
26%
25%
29%
30%
32%
31%
31%
30%
16%
14%
11%
11%
12%
10%
9%
10%
13%
4%
8%
8%
6%
7%
7%
8%
10%
13%
10% 17%
18%
20%
20%
22%
22%
21%
22%
20%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1Q16
2Q16
3Q16
4Q16
1Q17
2Q17
3Q17
4Q17
1Q18
Consumer Communication
Auto Industrial, medical and automation
Handset and others Computer
31
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 48. Embedded NVM comparison Exhibit 49. IoT connected devices forecast
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Ericsson
Apart from the demand drivers mentioned above, we also see bit density increasing and new
applications driving demand. These include: 1) PC BIOS upgrade. The 8th generation Intel Core
CPU requires an upgrade of NOR Flash memory from 64MB/128MB to 256MB; 2) Nintendo
Switch has NOR flash memory inside the game console.
NOR flash shipments in 2017 totalled around 5.7bn units, according to WSTS. We forecast that
volume demand for NOR flash will rise at a CAGR of 5-10% over 2018-20e.
Supply chain consolidation favours Chinese vendors
The NOR flash supply chain has migrated from the US and Korea to the Greater China region in
the past few years. In 2007, Spansion, Intel, Samsung and ST Microelectronics were the largest
NOR flash suppliers with over 80% market share. In 2008, Micron acquired Intel and
STMicroelectronics’ NOR flash business to become the No. 2 vendor.
Micron and Samsung Electronics have since switched their focus from NOR flash to 3D NAND
flash and the DRAM market, and their market share has declined over the past decade.
Samsung discontinued NOR flash production in 2012. Meanwhile, Cypress entered the NOR
flash industry by taking over Spansion in 2014. But since its strategy is to keep its overall gross
margin at around 50%, it has phased out some low-margin NOR flash business and now
focuses on the auto and industrial market; its gross margin for the segment is over 40%.
These changes in industry terrain are creating opportunities for Taiwan- and China-based
companies such as Macronix, Winbond and GigaDevice to gain market share. We now take a
closer look at the three companies’ capacity and product strategy.
Exhibit 50. Market share of NOR flash Exhibit 51. NOR flash product offering comparison
Node Density Voltage
Micron 46nm 128Mb-2Gb 1.65-3.6V Cypress 110-45nm 8Mb-4Gb 1.8-3.0V Winbond 90-46nm 512Kb-512Mb 1.2-3.0V Macronix 130-55nm 512Kb-2Gb 1.8V-5.0V GigaDevice 130-45nm 512Kb-1Gb 1.8-3.0V
Source: Company data, SemiInsights, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data
eFlash
One-time
programmable
(OTP)
Multi-time programmable
(MTP)
Electrically erasable programmable
read-only memory
EEPROMeFuse
Customized
Density
Endurance
4MB
2MB
256Kb
4Kb
1 1K 20K 100K 0.62.4
6.4
17.4
1.6
1.7
7.5
8.8
1.4
1.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2017 2023e
Fixedphones
Mobilephone
PC/laptop/tablet
Short-rangeIoT
Wide-areaIoT
19% CAGR for IoT devices
(bn)
10% CAGR for connected devices
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Macronix
Cypress/Spansion
Micron
Winbond
GigaDevice
Others
The NOR flash supply chain
has migrated from the US
and Korea to the Greater
China region
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
32
Macronix
Macronix, a Taiwan company, provides NOR flash, NAND Flash and ROM products. NOR flash
accounts for 44% of its 1Q18 revenue. Due to competition from Chinese competitors, it is
shifting its focus to high quality, high density NOR flash. The company ran at full capacity
utilization in 1Q18 and does not plan to expand production capacity in the foreseeable future.
That said, product mix optimization and a focus on high value-added products will be the key drivers.
Its NOR flash bit shipments declined 21% y-o-y and 27% q-o-q (chip volume times density). This was
mainly because of a fall in volume shipments in low-density products. Macronix expects 55nm plus
NOR flash will account for 18% of its total sales in 2018, up from 3% in 2017.
Macronix has two major fabs for NOR flash. The 8-inch fab (Fab 2) focuses on 130-75nm nodes,
with monthly capacity of 46,000 pieces of wafer. The 12-inch fab (Fab 5) mainly produces 75-55nm
NOR Flash and 36-19nm SLC NAND, with monthly capacity of 20,000. The company indicates it can
switch 55nm NOR flash capacity to 36nm NAND based on market demand.
Exhibit 52. Macronix NOR flash sales by node technology
Exhibit 53. Macronix NOR flash density shipment index
Source: Company data Source: Company data
Winbond
Winbond, listed in Taiwan, focuses on low- to medium-density Flash (NOR and NAND) memory, as
well as specialty and mobile DRAM products. Flash memory accounted for 52% of its revenue in
4Q17. Winbond’s capacity will increase from 46,000 in 2017 to 52,000 pieces/month (12 inch) in
2018, of which 26,000 are related to Flash (NOR plus NAND). Given Winbond has a longer track
record in NOR flash, we estimate it to account for over half of the total Flash capacity.
The auto and industrial segments are the main revenue drivers, with the percentage of total
revenue increasing from 2% in 2012 to 19% in 2017. Winbond focuses on 90nm and 58nm
NOR flash. It specializes in series NOR flash, an area where it is the No. 2 supplier in the world.
0% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 5% 6%1% 3%
13%
42%46% 49% 46% 43%
48%51%
55% 51%
46%50%
50%
58%53% 50% 53% 55%
50% 46%40% 43%
53%47%
37%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2016 2017 2018e
≤55nm ≤75nm ≥0.1um
100
113
127
114 112
127
144135
126
142153 151 150
160170 164
119
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1Q14
2Q14
3Q14
4Q14
1Q15
2Q15
3Q15
4Q15
1Q16
2Q16
3Q16
4Q16
1Q17
2Q17
3Q17
4Q17
1Q18
Density shipment Yoy
(1Q14=100)
33
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 54. Winbond revenue breakdown by application
Exhibit 55. Flash revenue by geometry
Source: Company data Source: Company data
GigaDevice
Unlike peers that have in-house wafer fabrication facilities, Beijing-based GigaDevice uses a
fabless model and relies on third party foundries and packaging companies to manufacture its
products. It mainly uses SMIC and Wuhan Xinxin’s 12-inch fabs. SMIC has total capacity of
447,750 wafers (8-inch equivalent) in 1Q18.
GigaDevice signed an agreement with SMIC in September 2017 to purchase not less than
RMB1.2bn of wafers by the end of 2018. In 2017, GigaDevice’s transactions with its top two
material suppliers amounted to only RMB621m and RMB228m. We therefore believe
GigaDevice plans to increase procurement from SMIC significantly in 2018.
Wuhan Xinxin is a dedicated Flash memory foundry and has monthly capacity of 10,000 pieces
(12-inch) for NOR flash. Customers include ESMT, Cypress (Spansion), and GigaDevice. But due to
supply constraints in raw wafers, it is not able to allocate additional capacity to GigaDevice. We
believe GigaDevice may also partner with Huali Microelectronics for additional capacity.
While GigaDevice does not disclose detailed capacity data, by gauging the revenue size and
capacity of Macronix and Winbond, we estimate GigaDevice’s actual production output required
around 12,000 pieces/month capacity (12-inch) in 2017. We believe GigaDevice’s fabless
model offers flexibility in terms of expanding and cutting capacity during the industry cycle.
Given the strong outlook, we think the company will benefit from an increase in demand.
Balanced demand & supply outlook in 2018-20
Global NOR flash capacity was around 88,000 wafers a month in 2017. Winbond said at its
4Q17 analyst meeting that total wafer capacity for NOR has increased 13% y-o-y in 1H18 to
approximately 100,000 pieces. We think this estimate factors in 25,000 pieces a month capacity
from SMIC for GigaDevice (source: Taiwan Economic Daily, 13 November 2017).
However, given GigaDevice’s revenue growth (20% y-o-y growth in 1Q18), we believe the
actual capacity is much less than reported. We forecast that GigaDevice’s utilized capacity will
increase from 12,000 pieces in 2017 to 21,600 pieces in 2020. Other key suppliers may include
Powerchip as the company started producing 65nm NOR flash from 4Q17 at its Hefei plant. We
model 5,000/10,000/15,000 pieces in 2018/19/20. Given that US peers are phasing out
capacity, we project a 5% decline in annual capacity over 2018-20e. As a result, the total NOR
flash capacity will increase by 7%, 8%, and 8% in 2018/19/20, which fits in with our forecast of a
5-10% growth in demand during this period.
As node migration in NOR flash is quite slow these days, the increase in demand for a certain
product category will generally translate into wafer volume growth. But since individual memory
29% 28%28%
28%25% 29%
34%
37% 34% 33%32%
29%
35%
30% 31%
28%25% 23%
2%
5%7%
11%
18% 19%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Consumer Communication Computer Car & Industrial
42% 37% 35%
57%56%
53%
1% 7%12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2014 2015 2016
90nm 58nm 46nm
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
34
chip density varies, the total wafer equivalent capacity is not able to precisely reflect bit density
changes due to product mix shift.
Exhibit 56. NOR flash capacity forecast
('000 12-inch pieces) 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e 2017-20 CAGR
Macronix 30.4 30.4 30.4 30.4 0% Winbond 16.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 4% GigaDevice 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.6 22% Powerchip - 5.0 10.0 15.0 n/a Others 29.6 28.1 26.7 25.3 -5% Total 88.0 94.5 102.1 110.4 8% y-o-y 7% 8% 8%
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Opportunity 2: Semi equipment – import substitution potential
Semi equipment sales to grow rapidly in 2018, China emerging as the key driver
According to SEMI, the global semiconductor equipment market increased 37% y-o-y to
USD56.6bn in 2017 and is expected to grow 11% y-o-y to a record high of USD63bn in 2018.
The rapid growth is being driven by: 1) memory fab capacity expansion by Samsung and SK
Hynix in Korea; and 2) a growing number of fab investments in China, including both domestic
and foreign enterprises. As a result, equipment sales in China increased 27% y-o-y to
USD8.23bn in 2017. China’s global share in equipment sales has risen from 7% in 2012 to 15%
in 2017, making it the third largest equipment sales market worldwide.
While capex is likely to decline in Korea and Taiwan in 2018-19, SEMI forecasts that China’s
spending on fab equipment will increase by 57% and 60% y-o-y in 2018 and 2019, and the
country is likely to overtake Korea to become world’s biggest spender in 2019. This creates
ample growth opportunities for Chinese semi equipment makers.
Exhibit 57. Global semi equipment sales Exhibit 58. Global semi equipment market share
Source: SEMI Source: SEMI
In China, 12 volume fabs have been constructed since 2014-15, increasing the level of equipment
purchases. In the past, foreign companies dominated fab investment in China. However, with the
launch of Chinese fabs such as NAND Flash Fab by Yangtze Memory Technologies, the DRAM fab
run by Hefei Changxin, and Huahong’s 12-inch fab in Wuxi, domestic companies’ share of
equipment spending in China will increase from 33% in 2017 to 45% in 2019. Our analysis shows the
total capex of the 12-inch fabs currently under construction in China amounts to USD77.8bn,
exceeding the total sales of equipment globally in 2017.
8.2 5.3 8.25.1 4.5 5.6
8.7
5.2
6.87.5 7.7
18.02.5
3.4
4.44.9 6.5
8.29.5
10.6
9.49.6
12.2
11.5
3.4
3.4
4.2 5.54.6
6.5
2.6
1.9
2.4 2.02.2
3.7
2.1
2.1
2.2 2.0
3.6
3.2
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
North America Korea China Taiwan Japan Europe Others
(USDbn)
22%17%
22%14% 11% 10%
23%
16%18%
20%19%
32%
7%
11%
12%13%
16%
15%
26%33%
25%26% 30%
20%
9% 11% 11% 15% 11% 11%
7% 6% 6% 5%5% 6%
6% 7% 6% 5% 9% 6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
North America Korea China Taiwan Japan Europe Others
35
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
While Chinese vendors are now only able to provide 28nm and above node equipment, we
understand a sizable part of the capacity of the new fabs under construction is targeting below
28nm. As a result, we estimate the addressable market size for Chinese equipment on 28nm
and above node is USD4bn in 2018 and USD6bn in 2019.
Exhibit 59. Number of fabs starting construction
Exhibit 60. IC equipment sales in China
Source: SEMI Source: SEMI
5
11
1312
10
3
11
16
9
15
10
4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e
China All other regions
2.53.4
4.4 4.9
6.5
8.2
12.9
20.7
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e
China Yoy
(USDbn)
Exhibit 61. List of 12-inch fabs in China
Company Location Project Technology node Capex Capacity Date of construction Date of operation
(USDbn) (k/month)
Under construction / planning
SMIC Shanghai South China JV 14nm 10.2 70 Oct-16 2019 Beijing North China JV 28nm HKMG 3.6 35 n/a n/a
Huahong Wuxi 65-90nm 2.5 40 Mar-18 2019 Huali Microelectronics Shanghai 28-14nm n/a 40 2016 2018 Samsung Xi'an NAND Flash 10nm 7.0 80 Mar-18 2019 SK Hynix Wuxi DRAM 10nm 8.6 60 Nov-17 2018
Yangtze Memory Wuhan NAND Flash / DRAM 24.0 300 Dec-16 2019 Nanjing NAND Flash n/a 300 n/a n/a
Global Foundries Chengdu Logic 0.18-0.13um/22nm SOI 9.1 65 Feb-17 2019 JHICC Jinjiang DRAM 32nm 5.7 60 Jul-17 3Q18 Hefei Changxin Hefei DRAM 19nm 7.2 125 May-17 2019 Current 12 inch fab in China
SMIC
Shanghai 45/40nm-28nm n/a 17 Oct-05 Dec-07 Beijing 0.18um-28nm n/a 46 Sep-02 Sep-04 Shenzhen 65-55nm n/a 3 Nov-16 4Q17 Beijing North China JV 40/28nm Polysion 3.6 29 Jul-13 4Q15
Huali Microelectronics Shanghai 55-40-28nm n/a 35 Jun-10 Apr-11 Samsung Xi'an NAND Flash 10.0 120 Apr-12 May-14 SK Hynix Wuxi DRAM 10.5 140 2005 2006 Intel Dalian 3D NAND Flash/ CPU 65nm 8.0 60 2007 2010 TSMC Nanjing 16nm FinFET 3.0 20 Jul-16 May-18 Wuhan Xinxin Wuhan NOR Flash 32nm 4.5 30 2011 2012 Powerchip Hefei Driver IC 90nm 2.0 40 Oct-15 Oct-17 UMC Xiamen Logic 55-40nm 2.1 50 Mar-15 Dec-17 Tacoma Huai An Image sensor 65/55nm 2.4 20 Mar-16 2017
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
36
Of this, wafer fabrication equipment (WFE), which is used in front-end semiconductor
manufacturing, represents over 80% of the total spending, with the balance going on back-end
processes such as probing, assembly and testing. The wafer fabrication process includes
deposition, lithography, etching, stripping, and cleaning.
US and Japanese vendors are the leading semi-equipment suppliers while European
companies such ASML have a dominant position in lithography equipment. Chinese companies
are catching up but still lag behind global peers in terms of technical know-how, product range,
and revenues.
Exhibit 63. Global semi equipment market by segment
Exhibit 64. Semi equipment capex breakdown in 2016
Source: ASM, VLSI Source: SEMI
China’s government has assigned a number of R&D projects to leading domestic semiconductor
companies, research institutes, and universities since 2008, an initiative known as the “02
special project”. This project covers advanced equipment and materials and has achieved
several breakthroughs. As at May 2017, China was able to mass produce over 16 types of front
end wafer fabrication equipment, mainly 28nm and above. In particular, AMEC’s 7nm etch
equipment is now part of TSMC’s supply chain.
Naura is also able to provide a wide range of equipment and it supplies 28nm etch equipment to
SMIC’s Beijing fab. Meanwhile, Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment (SMEE) is one of the
few vendors worldwide able to provide 90nm lithography equipment.
Lithography, 10.5, 19%
Etch and clean, 14.8, 26%
Deposition, 11.5, 20%
Process diagnostics,
6.5, 12%
Other wafer processes, 4.1,
7%
Test, 4.7, 8%
Assembly, 4.4, 8%(USDbn)
Wafer , 32.8, 80%
Packaging & assembly,
3.0, 7%
Test, 3.7, 9%
Others, 1.7, 4%
(USDbn)
Exhibit 62. Front-end wafer fabrication process
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities
Incoming
WAFERDEPOSITION LITHOGRAPHY ETCH STRIP CLEAN DEPOSITION
Put down the
insulating layers
to be patterned
Create the
pattern mask
Deposit conducting
materials for the
device
Remove residues
and particles
Remove the
photoresist mask
Selectively
remove material
to create features
37
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Chinese companies are also catching up in back-end packaging and test equipment. They are
able to produce 15 kinds of equipment and aim to lift the self-supply ratio to 50% by 2020 from
30% in 2015. In the 13th Five-Year Plan (2016-20) the target is to penetrate the 20-14nm
segment and increase the self-supply ratio in equipment and material.
Exhibit 66. “Made in China 2025” technology roadmap for semi equipment industry
Source: MIIT, HSBC Qianhai Securities
2015 2020 2025 2030
Manufacturing
Equipment
Lithography
Manufacturing
Materials
Package equipment
& materials
90-32nm equipment, to
reach 50% self-sufficiency 20-14nm equipment, with
30% self-sufficiency ratio18-inch wafer equipment
90nm equipment Immersion Lithography EUV Lithography
65-32nm equipment, to
reach 50% self-sufficiency
22-14nm equipment, with
50% self-sufficiency ratioTo realize full self-
sufficiency
30% self-
sufficiency ratio
30% self-sufficiency
ratio To realize full self-sufficiency
Exhibit 65. Product mapping of major semi equipment vendors
Applied ASML Tokyo Lam KLA ASM Advantest Naura AMEC
Materials Electron Research Tencor Pacific AMAT US ASML US 8035 JP LRCX US KLAC US 522 HK 6857 JP 002371 CH Private
FY17 revenue (USDbn) 14.5 10.3 10.2 8.0 3.5 2.2 1.9 0.3 0.2 Headquarter US Netherland Japan US US China Japan China China Product category
Lithography No Yes No No No No No No No Etch Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Clean Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Deposition Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Process diagnostics Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No Other wafer processes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Test No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Assembly No No No No Yes Yes No No No
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
38
Exhibit 67. List of major Chinese semi equipment vendors
Company name Major products
Naura
Plasma etcher, physical and chemical vapor deposition (PVD/CVD)
oxidate/diffusion, cleaning tool, indexer, gas measuring control
LCD, LED, and solar equipment
AMEC Plasma etcher on dielectric and polysilicon film, including reactive ion
etching (RIE), through-silicon via (TSV), MOCVD.
Shanghai Micro 90nm lithography, wafer optical inspection, material transport robot
Electronics Equipment wafer aligner/bonder, wafer edge exposure equipment
CETC Electronics Ion implanter, Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP)
Equipment Group Electrochemical deposition (ECD), packaging equipment
Piotech Plasma enhanced electric chemical vapor deposition (PECVD)
Atomic layer deposition (ALD)
Raintree Scientific Optical inspection equipment
Instruments
Han’s Laser Ultraviolet laser slicing, wafer modification cutting, laser stripping
ACM Research Single-wafer megasonic cleaning tools
KingSemi Coater, developer, cleaner, wet etcher, striper
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Laser source’s self-sufficiency ratio is increasing
As at 2016, China was able to produce 85% and 50% of its low-power (<100W) and mid-power
(100-1,000W) laser source needs, but had limited capabilities in the high-power (>1,000W)
category, which is dominated by overseas vendors such as IPG, Coherent, Trumpf, and nLight.
Chinese companies such as Raycus Laser and Han’s Laser have started to penetrate the high
power market, with output up to 10KW. This could significantly lower the overall manufacturing
cost for Chinese laser equipment makers and reduce reliance on imports at a time of rising
trade tensions between the US and China.
IPG’s gross margin was 57% in 2017, which suggests that is should be possible to reduce laser
sourcing cost via domestic production. The total market size of laser sources increased from
USD9.0bn in 2013 to USD12.4bn in 2017, a CAGR of 8.5%.
Opportunity 3: IC packaging and testing – market share gains
Outsourcing and consolidation favours leading OSAT
The packaging and testing market accounts for a mid-teens percentage of global IC industry
output. In China, however, the figure was 35% in 2017, indicating its heavy reliance on this
segment. Packaging and testing is the IC segment where China’s technology gap with global
peers is the smallest.
The global market can be divided into IDM in-house packaging and testing, and OSAT.
According to Gantner, in 2016 the share of IDM in-house and OSAT was 48% and 52%,
respectively. We think IDM will outsource or spin off some of the packaging and testing services
in an environment of rising investment in advanced packaging technology. Hence, the market
growth of OSAT should be slightly faster than for IDM.
As the semiconductor industry enters a mature stage, competition is intensifying. Similar to the
upstream design house and foundry industry, the OSAT market is also consolidating as the
leaders seek larger economies of scale and better technology to remain competitive.
39
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Earlier this year ASE, the largest OSAT company, merged with SPIL, the No. 4 company. The new
giant has nearly 30% of the OSAT market. In 2016, Amkor acquired J-Device, the largest OSAT in
Japan, and Nanium, a leading OSAT company in Europe, in 2017. PTI ( ) acquired Micron Akita
in 2017, a packaging and testing site of Micron in Japan. JCET acquired STATS ChipPAC in 2014,
and Tongfu bought an 85% stake in two AMD packaging and testing fabs in 2016.
According to TechSearch, the number of OSAT companies worldwide is over 100, but the top 10
represent nearly 75% of the market. Taiwan now has the strongest presence in OSAT, followed
the US, China, and Singapore. China’s IC packaging and testing market reached RMB189bn in
2017, a 15.2% CAGR since 2005, outpacing the global packaging and testing market. Among the
top 10 global OSATs, revenue generated by China’s top three OSATs – JECT, Huatian, and
Tongfu – increased from 6.6% in 2011 to 21.2% in 2017.
Exhibit 68. Market share among top 10 global OSATs
Exhibit 69. OSAT M&A activity
Year M&A events
2013 Amkor acquired Toshiba's P&T operations in Malaysia.
2014
UTAC acquired Panasonic's P&T operations in Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia.
2015
Tianshui Huatian acquired FlipChip International. JECT acquired STATS ChipPAC. Amkor acquired J-Devices.
2016 Tongfu and National IC Fund acquired 85% stake of AMD's P&T operations in Malaysia and China.
2017
PTI increased its stake in Tera Probe to nearly 60% and acquired Micron Akita. Amkor acquired NANIUM.
2018 ASE merged with SPIL.
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities
China is benefiting from upstream capacity expansion
We expect growth in China’s packaging and testing market to remain robust in the coming years
thanks to upstream capacity expansion. SEMI estimates that 62 wafer fabs will come start
operations between 2017 and 2020, of which 26 are located in China. These new fabs will bring
new orders to Chinese packaging and testing companies.
Exhibit 70. China packaging and testing market trend
Exhibit 71. China top 10 packaging and testing companies by revenue (RMBbn)
Ranking Company Revenue
1 Xinchao Group (JCET's parent Co)
24.26
2 Huada Group (Tongfu's parent Co)
19.88
3 Tianshui Huatian Group (Huatian's parent Co)
9.00
4 Qorvo 7.89 5 NXP 6.45 6 Intel 4.00 7 Amkor 3.95 8 Hitech 3.50 9 KaiHong 3.00 10 SanDisk 2.94
Source: CSIA Source: CSIA
40.3% 40.5% 42.6% 43.3% 43.6%37.0% 36.6%
17.7% 17.0% 17.0% 16.0% 14.1%16.9% 16.1%
13.3% 13.5% 13.4% 14.0% 12.7%11.5% 10.5%
6.6% 7.5%8.7% 9.8% 13.2% 19.1% 21.2%
22.1% 21.5% 18.2% 17.0% 16.4% 15.5% 15.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
ASE Amkor SPIL China top 3 OSATs Others
34
51
63 62
50
63
98 104
110
126
138
156
189
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
15.2% CAGR
(RMBbn)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
40
Advanced packaging is moving into the mainstream as manufacturers seek ways to improve
device performance. The semiconductor industry is also witnessing increasing investment from
packaging houses in terms of capabilities, capacity, and infrastructure. This is driven by the
need to deliver integrated, high-performance devices while addressing concerns about cost,
power consumption, and size.
Advanced packaging has two development paths: 1) size reduction, i.e. reducing chip size close
to the die size; typical platforms include FC (Flip-Chip) and Fan-in/Fan-out WLP (Wafer Level
Packaging); and 2) functional development, i.e. emphasis on integration to provide multi-
functions in system miniaturization; platforms include TSV (Through-Silicon Visa) technology +
SiP (System in Package).
Exhibit 72. IC packaging technology trend
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities
Yole Development, a consulting firm, estimates that the global advanced packaging market was
worth USD24bn in 2017 and will reach USD34bn in 2022, accounting for 45% of the total
packaging market and representing a CAGR of 7%. This outpaces the 3-4% CAGR of the
overall packaging market and the 4-5% CAGR of the semiconductor market.
Yole expects the growth in the advanced segment to be led by smartphones and tablets. Other
high-volume applications include servers, PC, game stations, HDD/USB, WiFi hardware, base
stations, TVs and set top boxes. FC is the mostly used platform with 81% market share in 2017,
while Fan-out is the fastest growing advanced packaging platform with a 36% CAGR, followed
by the 2.5/3D TSV platform (28% CAGR). By 2022, the market size of Fan-out and 2.5D/3D
TSV is expected to exceed USD3bn and USD1bn, respectively.
1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
Through hole
mounting
Increasing I/O; Increasing Functionality
Surface
mounting
Area array
surface
High density
packaging
- TO, DIP
- Mounted on the PCB
though holes, the
packaging size is
increased with
number of I/O
- ≤10 I/Os/cm2
- Strong, reliable,
good heat dissipation,
easy wiring
- SOP,QFP
- Lead replaces pin,
packaging size is
fixed and peripheral
I/Os pitch changes
according to
requirements
- 10-50I/Os/cm2
- Improved I/O
number and assembly
density
- BGA, CSP
- Solder ball replaces
lead, area array
surface mounting
- 40-60I/Os/cm2
- Greatly improved
I/O number, low
power consumption
- WLP, 3D stacking
- Reduce packaging
thickness or stack
more than two dies in
the same packaging
without changing the
packaging size
- ≥60I/Os/cm2
- High integration, low
power consumption
41
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 73. Advanced packaging revenue by platform
Exhibit 74. Advanced packaging wafer share by manufacturer
Source: Yole Source: Yole
According to Yole, the advanced packaging revenue generated from Chinese companies was
USD2.2bn in 2015, and will reach USD4.6bn in 2022, a 16% CAGR and about 2x faster than
the growth in the global advanced packaging market.
Through in-house R&D and acquisition, domestic packaging and testing companies have
broadly caught up with international peers in terms of technology. They are still lagging behind
in some specific platforms, such as high density Fan-out.
At present, the top three Chinese OSATs – JCET, Huatian and Tongfu – have mastered the
16/14nm FC packaging technology. JCET now owns leading-edge Fan-in/Fan-out and SiP
technology through the acquisition of STATS ChipPAC. It has shipped more than 1.5bn low-
density Fan-out chips.
Tongfu obtained high IOs density FC-BGA packaging technology through the acquisition of
AMD Suzhou and Penang fabs. Huatian’s TSV+SiP fingerprint identification packaging product
has been used in Huawei smartphones. Meanwhile, WLCSP ( ) has become one of the
world’s largest image sensor WLP (Wafer-Level Packaging) suppliers. According to the China
Semiconductor Industry Association, domestic packaging and testing companies contributed
32% of China advanced packaging market in 2016.
Exhibit 75. Advanced packaging revenue from Chinese companies
Exhibit 76. Fan-out packaging applications focus for player
Source: Yole Source: Yole
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
2017 2022
Fan-in Fan-out Flip Chip 2.5D/3D
7% CAGR
* CAGR 2017-2020
(2.5D/3D 28%*)
(Flip Chip 5%*)
(Fan-in 8%*)
(Fan-out 36%*)
(USDbn)
Intel12%
SPIL12%
JCET/STATS ChipPAC
8%
ASE8%
ChipBond8%
Samsung7%
TSMC7%
Amkor6%
Others33%
2.21
2.56
2.97
3.45
4.01
4.66
-
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
2015 2016 2017e 2018e 2019e 2020e
16% CAGR
(USDbn)
2x2 5x5 10x10 15x15 20x20 >20x20 >>20x20
Package size
(mm x mm)
100
1000
10000
IO count
Core Fan-out
High density, Fan-out,
First level, APE
High density, Fan-out, Second
level, networking, etc…
SPIL
AmkorTSMC
ASETSMC
SamsungNepes
JCET/
STATSChipPAC
ASE
SPIL
Deca Technologies
Amkor/
Nanium
Different Fan-out platforms for different applications…and different suppliers.
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
42
The potential to improve margins and ROE
The top Chinese OSATs on average generated a gross margin of 14.7% and ROE of 5% ROE
in 2017. This is considerably lower than their Taiwan/US peers, which recorded average gross
margins of 19.2% and ROE of 14.3%.
We believe this is primarily due to: 1) product mix differences, as fabless and IDM customers
normally place new orders to offshore OSATs and gradually migrate orders to onshore peers as
products become more commoditized; and 2) it will take time for JCET and Tongfu to integrate
their newly-acquired assets. With the ongoing product upgrades and cost structure optimization,
we expect to see improvements in margin and ROE in the years ahead.
Exhibit 77. Gross margin comparison of OSATs
Exhibit 78. ROE comparison of OSATs
Note: offshore companies include ASE, SPIL, Amkor, and Power Tech
Onshore companies include JCET, Huatian and Tongfu
Source: Company data Source: Company data
Growth drivers shifting from mobile to auto and IoT
Although the PC and mobile segments will remain the largest part of the IC market, automotive
and IoT are expected to be the fastest semiconductor growth segments in the coming years.
Due to the slowdown in the smartphone market, OSATs’ margins face downward pressure.
Despite the long qualification process, the packaging technology applied in auto and IoT is not
as advanced as in smartphones, making the competitive landscape more competitive.
Traditional lead frame products are by far the largest type of automotive packaging as they have
proved to be very reliable components. Due to the long product life cycle, lead frame packages
selected over a decade ago are still being manufactured for the same applications. This is not to
say that non-lead frame packaging is absent from today’s vehicles.
Due to the increasing complexity and higher performance, pin count, power, and cost
requirements of automotive applications, the packaging industry is moving towards high
performance packages such as flip chip or wafer level fan-out packaging for automotive
infotainment, GPS, and radar applications.
Since IoT products are driven by the need for the smallest form factor (think wearables) and
ultra-low power (for longer battery life), the electronic components for these products must also
meet these criteria. System-in-package (SiP) technology is the trend, it allows multiple die to be
placed within a package molding in a variety of configurations to help solve these size and low-
power design challenges.
17.6%18.2%
20.1% 19.9% 20.4%19.2%
15.8%
19.3%
20.7%20.1%
16.0%14.7%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Offshore Onshore
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
ASE SPIL Power Tech JCET Huatian Tongfu
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
43
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 79. Share of 2017 IC sales and market size CAGR (2016-21)
Source: IC Insights
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
-3.0% 0.0% 3.0% 6.0% 9.0% 12.0% 15.0%
Automotive $28.0
Cellphones $89.7
IoT $20.9Medical $5.9
Wearables $3.5
Servers $16.7
Standard PCs $69.0
Gov/Military $2.6
Digital TVs $13.8
Set-Top Boxes $5.8
Game Consoles$10.5
Tablets $11.6
(US$ bn)
2016-21 CAGR
Sh
are
of
2017
IC s
ales
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
44
Company updates
45
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
China’s largest semiconductor equipment company
Naura Technology Group is a leading manufacturer of advanced electronic equipment and
precision components. Its products cover a range of industries, including semiconductors, LED,
photovoltaic, display, and aerospace. The company was established in 2001 and was listed on
the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2010. It was previously known as Sevenstar Electronics, an
SOE owned by Beijing SASAC that engaged in semiconductor cleaning and oxidation/diffusion
equipment, lithium battery, vacuum equipment for PV, as well as high-precision electronic
components.
In 2016, Sevenstar merged with North Microelectronics (part of the parent company) and
expanded its semiconductor equipment product portfolio to etching, PVD, CVD advanced
packaging and LED equipment. This enabled Naura to become China’s largest semiconductor
equipment company in terms of revenue. Key customers include SMIC, Huali Microelectronics,
San’An, HC SemiTek, BOE, and Longi Silicon. The company has four manufacturing centres in
Beijing – Yizhuang, Shunyi, Pinggu, and Chaoyang – and one in the US.
Exhibit 80. Naura organization chart Exhibit 81. Naura’s business portfolio
Source: Company data Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
R&D investment in 2015-17 accounted for between 29% and 47% of its total revenue. Naura is
heavily involved in the government’s “02” R&D initiative and has undertaken 12 research
projects. As a result it has completed the development and commercialization of a number of
products and processes, including 12 inch 90-28nm etcher, PVD, oxidation, cleaning and low
pressure chemical vapour deposition (LPCVD). As at end 2017, Naura had applied for over
3,000 patents, and more than1,600 have been granted.
Beijing Electronics Holding Co
Beijing SASAC
Beijing Sevenstar Huadian
Technology GroupNational IC Investment Fund
Naura (002371 CH)
100%
100%
9.23%38.9% 7.5%
Naura Technology Group
Semiconductor equipmentVacuum
equipment for PV
Lithium battery
equipment
Precision
component
Etch
PVD
CVD
Cleaning
Oxidation/
Diffusion
Mass flow
controllerAssets from North Microelectronics
LED
equipment
Display
equipmentMEMS
Power IC
Naura (002371 CH)
Leading IC equipment vendor with a comprehensive product portfolio
The company invests heavily in R&D. Multiple growth drivers in IC,
display, PCB, and electronic components
Initiate with a Buy rating and a target price of RMB63.97
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
46
Exhibit 82. Revenue and profit trend Exhibit 83. Naura’s patents – applied for and authorized
Source: Company data Source: Company data
Semiconductor equipment: gaining traction with customers
In 2017, sales of semiconductor equipment totalled RMB1,134m in 2017 – RMB400m from IC
equipment, RMB500m from LED, RMB130m from display and the rest from solar equipment. Its
IC equipment product portfolio covers etch, PVD, CVD, oxidation/diffusion furnace, cleaning
tools, and mass flow controllers. Naura has accumulated abundant proprietary know-how and
IP in IC equipment in the past decade and can now commercially scale a portfolio covering 90-
28nm technologies and is currently undertaking R&D for 16/14nm.
Exhibit 84. Major milestones of Naura’s IC equipment business
Year Events
2012 The first 300mm diffusion furnace passes customer qualification and starts commercial sales
R&D of 300mm mass flow controller (MFC) completed and enters commercialization phase
2013
300mm oxidation furnace enters mass production
300mm MFC realizes commercial sales; 65mn cleaning tool receives national qualification
Sample shipment of 45-32nm LPCVD equipment
2014 28nm 300mm oxidation furnace meets technical requirements of SMIC
Complete testing of 65-45nm cleaning tool for SMIC; 45-32nm LPCVD under development
2015
Completes 7 equipment sales of 300mm 90/65nm oxidation furnace and MFC
Continues to test 32-28nm LPCVD project within SMIC
Starts R&D of 28-14nm Atom Layer Deposition (ALD)
2016
Completes the merger with North Microelectronics, thus expanding product portfolio to etching,
PVD, CVD
Accelerates its R&D in 16/14nm equipment
2017 Proposes to acquire Akrion System, US based semi cleaning equipment company, for USD15mn
Signs over RMB1.2bn supply contract with Longi on mono silicon furnace
2018 Completes the acquisition of Akrion, US-based cleaning equipment company
Source: Company data
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Semiconductor Electronic component Vacuum Lithium battery Others
(RMBmn)
835
1,055
1,340
1,701
2,226
2,627
2,937 3,013
348 475
619 790
1,018
1,233 1,371
1,621
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Accumulative patents applied Accumulated patent authorized
47
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 85. Naura’s major products and functions
Name Description
Etch A process for removing material in a specific area through a chemical reaction or physical bombardment. The process can be performed using liquid-phase (wet) etchants or under vacuum (dry) typically using a plasma to generate gas-phase reactants
PVD A process technology in which atoms of conducting materials are sputtered from a target of pure material then deposited on the substrate to create the conducting circuitry within an IC or a flat panel display.
CVD A process for depositing thin films by exposing the substrate to one or more volatile precursors, which react and/or decompose on the substrate surface
Oxidation A way to produce a thin layer of oxide (usually SiO2) on the surface of a wafer. This forces an oxidizing agent to diffuse into the wafer at high temperature and react with it
Cleaning A process to remove unwanted material or contaminants from substrates
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Its major customers include SMIC, Huali Microelectronics, Yangtze Memory, and Shanghai IC
R&D Center. SMIC accounted for over 60% of Naura’s IC equipment revenue last year. The
company started to supply IC equipment to SMIC in 2011 and began testing 28nm equipment in
2014; its PVD has become the baseline equipment for SMIC.
Naura and AMEC’s etcher products are based on dry etching technology that uses plasma to
remove unwanted material from silicon wafers. Based on the type of plasma, it can be divided into
inductively coupled plasma (ICP), capacitively coupled plasma (CCP) and microwave electron
cyclotron resonance (ECR) plasma. Naura specializes in ICP, while AMEC focuses on CCP.
Exhibit 86. Naura’s IC equipment shipments
Exhibit 87. AMEC’s accumulative IC equipment sales
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Looking ahead, we believe capacity expansion by key customers and the construction of new
fabs is creating opportunities for Naura. For example:
In 2018 SMIC has budgeted USD1.9bn in capex for foundry, with USD500m and USD400m
to be spent on expanding the capacity of its majority-owned Beijing 300mm fab and its new
200mm Tianjin fab.
Naura delivered an oxidation furnace to Yangtze Memory in November 2017 and recently
won bids to supply the company with etcher and PVD in 2018.
For Huali, the company has installed a 14-20nm advanced lithography equipment from
ASML in May 2018 in Shanghai, suggesting that Huali is in process of ramping up its new
300mm fab.
Naura signed a framework contract with Hefei Changxin in April 2018. The company will
fully assess, test and jointly develop equipment with Naura.
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Etch PVD CVD Oxidation Cleaning
(cavity)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
D-etch TSV/ICP MOCVD Total
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
48
Naura estimates that domestic equipment represents only 5% of the spending on equipment by
major Chinese foundries, suggesting opportunities for Naura in the coming years. It takes
around four years from R&D to commercialization – two years’ in-house development and two
years’ on-site testing and review. The average selling price (ASP) for etcher, PVD and CVD is
around RMB20-30m and RMB10m for cleaning and oxidation equipment.
Exhibit 88. Etcher equipment classification
Product Key customers Accumulative sales
Etcher SMIC, Yangtze Memory Over 600 cavities
PVD SMIC, Leadcore Technology, Yangtze Memory Over 100 cavities
CVD SMIC, Shanghai IC R&D Center Over 200 cavities
Oxidation/Diffusion SMIC, Huali Microelectronics, Yangtze Memory Over 100 cavities
Cleaning SMIC, Yangtze Memory Over 100 cavities
Source: Company data
Apart from organic growth, Naura also relies on M&A to drive revenue growth. In 2017, Naura
offered to acquire 100% of Akrion Systems, a US-based semiconductor equipment vendor, for
USD15m and the transaction was completed in January 2018. Akrion is a leading supplier of
surface preparation equipment (such as cleaning/stripping) for silicon wafer, semiconductor
devices, flat panel displays, MEMS, and solar.
Akrion has over 20 years of experience and has installed over 1,000 systems worldwide. Seven
out of the top 10 foundries, and five out of top 10 MEMS manufacturers are Akrion customers,
including Globalfoundries, and STMicroelectronics. It has over 80 employees and 8,500 square
inches of manufacturing facilities and 2,000 square inches of labs.
This acquisition is helping Naura to broaden its customer base and enhance its service
capability (Naura intends to introduce Akrion’s products to SMIC in 2018). Akrion also
announced strong bookings in 1Q18, indicating it will ship to existing and new customers in the
US, China and Southeast Asia this year. While Akrion generated RMB106m and RMB80m in
revenue in 2015 and 2016 it incurred net losses of RMB20m and RMB23m, respectively, after
stripping out interest-bearing loans and cash (which are not within the scope of the acquisition).
Exhibit 89. Chinese equipment supplier for front-end IC manufacturing
Category Product Supplier
Lithography Lithography Shanghai Microelectronics equipment
Coater/developer Kingsemi (Shenyang)
Photoresist Strip Naura, Mattson (Beijing)
Etch Etcher Naura, AMEC, Mattson (Beijing)
Surface treatment Clean Naura, ACM Research (Shanghai),
Thermal treatment
Oxidation/diffusion Naura
Single-wafer anneal Naura
Fast anneal Mattson (Beijing)
Ion implantation Ion implantation Kingstone
CVD
LPCVD Naura
ALD Naura, Piotech (Shenyang)
PECVD Naura, Piotech (Shenyang)
PVD PVD Naura
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
49
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
LED equipment: riding the wave of capacity expansion by Chinese chip makers
Revenue from LED equipment surged 50% y-o-y to around RMB500m in 2017. The
manufacturing process for LED chips can be divided into front-end epitaxy wafer processing,
middle-end chip manufacturing and back-end packaging. Metal organic chemical vapour
deposition (MOCVD) is the key equipment in epitaxy wafer processing, with vendors such as
Veeco, Aixtron and AMEC. Mid-end chip manufacturing involves multiple steps including
lithography, etching, cleaning, metallization, and anneal.
Naura supplies ICP etcher, plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) and PVD to
LED chip manufacturers. Its patterned sapphire substrate (PSS) etcher has captured over 80%
market share in China in the past four years. Its overall market share in the three product lines
is over 70%, with the remaining supply coming from Oxford Instrument and Evatec.
Exhibit 90. LED manufacturing process
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Its key customers include leading Chinese LED chip makers such as San’An Optoelectronics,
HC Semitek, Sinopatt, Elec-Tech International, and Changelight. Chinese LED makers are
gaining market share by expanding capacity and raising capex. The fixed asset investment of
the top four LED chip makers surged 155% y-o-y in 2017 to RMB7bn. The rapid capacity
expansion last year was mainly due to undersupply and strong demand.
LED Inside, an industry media platform, forecasts that China’s total LED chip production capacity will
increase by 49% y-o-y, from 8.56m pieces (2-inch equivalent) in 2017 to 12.76m pieces in 2018. This
growth is in line with our 45% y-o-y revenue growth forecast for Naura in 2018.
Although the top Chinese LED chip makers are aggressively expanding capacity, lower-tier
Chinese and overseas vendors are more conservative due to the lack of cost advantage and
scale effect. Therefore, we believe China will continue to increase their market share in LED
capacity in 2018-20 from the 58% level in 2017. This will benefit Chinese LED equipment
vendors such as Naura.
Substrate
Epitaxy wafer
MOCVD
PVD (ITO)
Mask/lithography
Cleaning
Cleaning
GaN Etch
Anneal
SiO2 Etch
(PECVD)
Grinding
LED dies on
wafer
LED chips on
wafer
Die
singulation
Test
Inspection
Packaging
Encapsulati
on
Packaged
LED
Back end Middle end Front end
Sapphire/SiC/Si/
GaAs
LED structure
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
50
Exhibit 91. Major LED chip makers’ capex trend
Exhibit 92. Capacity expansion plans of LED makers in China
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: LEDInside
On the demand side, we believe lighting, digital display and automotive will continue to be the
key drivers in 2018-19. LEDInside forecasts that the LED packaging market will increase from
RMB65.9bn in 2017 to RMB76.8bn in 2021, a 4% CAGR. In the longer term, mini LED and
micro LED will become the new growth drivers for the LED market as they require more
advanced knowledge and new technology. An upgrade cycle for equipment is likely to take
place in the coming years, creating new opportunities for equipment makers.
The size of mini LED and micro LED is much smaller than LED, providing lower latency, higher
contrast ratio and greater colour saturation. LEDInside forecasts that the mini LED and micro
LED markets will reach a combined USD1.38bn in 2022 and USD2.89bn in 2025. Micro AR
projector, head-up display (HUD), and large-size display panels are likely to be the applications
for the new technologies. Nichia, a Japanese company, already announced it will mass produce
mini LED by end 2018 and micro LED in 2022. San’An has also formed a strategic partnership
with Samsung for micro LED supply.
Exhibit 93. Mini LED and Micro LED market size
Exhibit 94. Technical features of Mini and Micro LED
Mini LED Micro LED
Application LCD backlight, Organic light emitting display
short range display Micro projection display Quantities to be used in TV
Thousands Millions
Time of commercial launch
2018 2019-2022
Advantages Curve and abnormity display
High power efficiency, higher contrast ratio
Price compared to LCD
20% higher 3 times at initial stage
Source: LEDInside Source: LEDInside
Flat panel display: increasing exposure to BOE
Naura’s flat panel display equipment includes ultraviolet curing, indexer, and cleaning tools,
which are mainly applied in BOE’s thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) fabs,
(G10.5, G8.5, G6, G5.5, and G4.5). Its ultraviolet cure is used to cure and dry a glue in the
frame using ultraviolet light. An indexer mainly facilitates glass substrate movement and
transportation along production lines. Naura also provides other equipment for display
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
San'An HC Semitek Changelight Aucksun
(RMBm)
1,400
2,700
4,000
700
1,700
3,000
170
1,000
2,000
2,930
3,160
3,760
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
2016 2017 2018e
San'An HC Semitek Aucksun Others
('000 pieces/month, 2 inch)
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Mini LED Micro LED
(USDm)
51
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
customers, including units for air cooling, solvent recycling, thermal recycling, and gas
measuring controls.
Naura’s revenue from BOE has increased from RMB35m in 2015, RMB86m in 2016 to
RMB130m in 2017. But its products only account for 1.0-1.5% of BOE’s total production line
spending, suggesting ample opportunities to gain market share ahead.
Looking ahead, we identify the capacity ramp-up of BOE’s G10.5 fab in Hefei, G8.5 in Fuzhou,
and upcoming new G10.5 fab in Wuhan as the key revenue drivers for Naura in 2018-20. The
Hefei fab commenced commercial production in March 2018 and its designed capacity amounts
to 120,000 sheets/month. BOE has budgeted RMB46bn to build the Wuhan TFT-LCD fab and
construction started in March 2018. The construction period lasts two years and the project
targets the 65/75 inch TV market.
Exhibit 95. Production capacity of BOE
Location Fab/Gen Product Tech Capacity Capex Status
('000/month) (RMBbn)
Beijing G5 LCD a-Si 70 11.0 In operation
Ordos G5.5 LCD/OLED LTPS/OLED 30 22.0 In operation
Hefei G6 LCD a-Si 120 17.5 In operation
Beijing G8.5 LCD a-Si 150 28.0 In operation
Hefei G8.5 LCD a-Si 120 28.5 In operation
Chongqing G8.5 LCD a-Si 150 32.8 In operation
Fuzhou G8.5 LCD a-Si 150 30.0 In operation
Hefei G10.5 LCD a-Si 120 40.0 In operation
Chengdu G6 AMOLED OLED 48 46.5 In operation
Wuhan G10.6 LCD a-Si 120 46.0 Construction
Mianyang G6 AMOLED OLED 48 46.5 Construction
Source: Company data
Vacuum equipment: resilient growth outlook despite near-term headwind
The products in this segment include crystal growing, brazing, heat treatment and sintering
furnaces. Naura is a major supplier of vacuum equipment to mono-crystalline wafer maker Longi
Green Energy. Longi has increased its wafer manufacturing capacity from 5GW in 2015, to
7.5GW in 2016 and 15.0GW in 2017, and plans to reach 28GW in 2018 and 45GW in 2020.
Naura accounts for 50% of Longi’s vacuum equipment purchases (Dalian Liancheng is the other
supplier).
Although China’s solar market installation may decline y-o-y in 2018 due to changes in subsidy
policy announced in May, we believe the following factors will enable Naura to deliver stable
revenue growth in vacuum equipment:
Installation growth overseas to offset China’s slowdown: IHS forecasts that global PV
installation will grow 11% y-o-y in 2018 to 105GW despite downward revisions to China’s
estimates from 53GW to 38GW. Countries such as Australia, Mexico, Canada, and Brazil
are the growth drivers.
Market share gains of mono-crystalline over multi-crystalline: Mono-crystalline silicon wafer
has a higher power conversion efficiency than multi-crystalline silicon and its production
cost has declined rapidly in recent years, thanks to the adoption of diamond wire cutting
and efficiency gains through technology innovation.
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
52
Naura’s current order backlog with Longi is around RMB1bn, mainly for ingot capacity
expansion projects in Ningxia and Yunnan. Naura expects to recognise RMB500m of this
revenue in 2018.
Exhibit 96. Longi capacity expansion plan Exhibit 97. Market share breakdown of mono- and multi-crystalline wafer
Source: Company data Source: ITRPV, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Exhibit 98. Contracts with Longi
Contract size
Date Project (RMBm)
Sep-17 Yunnan Ingot capacity expansion 344 Jun-17 Yunnan Ingot capacity expansion 345 Mar-17 Ningxia Zhongning ingot capacity expansion 168 Mar-17 Ningxia Yinchuan ingot capacity expansion 165 Jul-16 Ningxia Yinchuan ingot capacity expansion 161 Total 1,183
Source: Company data
Precision components: steady and sustainable growth
High precision electronic components are Naura’s traditional business. Its products include
precision resistors, microwave modules, tantalum capacitors, crystal devices, and power supply
modules used in aerospace, aviation, shipping, and railways. Its customers are mainly in the
defence industry and include China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, China
Aerospace Science & Industry Corporation, and China North Industries Group.
Naura has limited competition in this business and enjoys premium margins. The segment’s
revenue has increased steadily from RMB192m in 2010 to RMB763m in 2017, a 31% CAGR.
Meanwhile, gross margin has consistently stayed above 40%. Looking ahead, Naura expects a
10-15% revenue CAGR in the coming 3-5 years, thanks to increases in defence spending,
product upgrades, import substitution, and R&D initiatives in new applications.
7.5
15.0
28.0
36.0
45.0
2.5
7.5
13.0
8.0 9.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Mono wafer installed capacity Incremental capacity
(GW)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2017 2018 2020 2022 2025 2028
P-type multi P-type mono N-type mono
53
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 99. Revenue and growth trends of the precision components business
Exhibit 100. Gross profit and margin of the precision components business
Source: Company data Source: Company data
Forecasts and valuation
Earnings forecasts
We forecast that Naura will record a 52% net profit CAGR over 2017-20e, driven by a 27%
revenue CAGR, gross margin expansion and operating leverage. We expect IC equipment will
be the major revenue driver, with a 46% CAGR, followed by 37% in display and 35% in vacuum
equipment. We believe IC equipment will account for 27% of total revenue by 2020, up from
18% in 2017. The company guides for RMB3.2bn revenue for 2018, which is supported by a
robust order backlog. As at end-2017, Naura had an order backlog of over RMB2bn and
received an additional RMB500-600m in new orders in 1Q18.
IC equipment has a gross margin of over 40%, vs. over 30% for LED and over 20% for solar
equipment. With a higher revenue contribution from high-margin IC equipment, we expect the
overall gross margin to increase from 36.6% in 2017 to 38% in 2020e. As its revenue increases,
we believe Naura can deliver operating leverage in the coming years.
We now analyse the impact of government subsidies on net profit. Naura’s SG&A expenses
surged from RMB203m in 2015 (before the acquisition of North Microelectronics) to RMB904m
in 2016 but declined to RMB795m last year. This volatility is mainly due to the booking of R&D
expenses. The government provides annual subsidies to Naura to support R&D for advanced IC
equipment as part of the “02 Project”. The subsidies are reflected in the deferred income
balance in non-current liabilities.
At the end of 2017, Naura had RMB1.25bn in deferred income on its balance sheet. Naura
indicates that the government subsidy will continue at the level of RMB500-600m over 2018-20.
We note that Naura’s annual subsidy income recognised on the income statement is largely in
line with the R&D expenses booked. Therefore, we believe the fluctuation in R&D expenses and
subsidies is neutral to our net profit forecast for Naura.
174 169192
242280
317349
400
608
763
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Revenue Yoy
(RMBm)
70 75 78
116
157
186204
235
271
334
40%
44%
41%
48%
56%58% 59% 59%
45% 44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Gross profit Gross margin
(RMBm)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
54
Exhibit 101. Revenue and gross profit forecasts
2017-20
Revenue (RMBm) 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e CAGR
IC 300 400 552 828 1,242 46% LED 336 504 731 877 1,052 28% Solar 91 100 100 100 100 0% Display 86 130 182 246 332 37% Semiconductor equipment 813 1,134 1,565 2,051 2,726 34% Vacuum 88 201 500 500 500 35% Lithium battery 96 100 160 176 194 25% Precision component 608 763 862 992 1,140 14% Others 18 25 28 30 33 10% Total 1,622 2,223 3,114 3,748 4,593 27% y-o-y 37% 40% 20% 23% -15% Gross profit
Semiconductor equipment 332 401 553 759 1,063 38% Vacuum 20 56 130 130 130 32% Lithium battery 19 19 30 33 37 25% Precision component 271 334 388 446 513 15% Others 3 3 4 4 4 13% Total 645 813 1,105 1,372 1,747 29% Gross margin
Semiconductor equipment 40.9% 35.4% 35.4% 37.0% 39.0%
Vacuum 22.7% 28.0% 26.0% 26.0% 26.0%
Lithium battery 19.6% 19.2% 19.0% 19.0% 19.0%
Precision component 44.6% 43.7% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0%
Others 14.7% 13.1% 13.1% 13.1% 13.1%
Total 39.7% 36.6% 35.5% 36.6% 38.0%
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Exhibit 102. Key assumptions in income statement
(RMBm) 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
G&A expenses 203 904 795 1,061 1,107 1,166 R&D expenses booked 41 585 357 500 500 500 R&D investment capitalized 207 173 380 250 250 250 Total R&D investment 248 758 736 750 750 750 G&A to revenue excl. R&D 19.0% 19.7% 19.7% 18.0% 16.2% 14.5% Government subsidies booked 51 612 388 500 500 500 Deferred income balance 1,117 1,410 1,246 1,246 1,246 1,246
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Sensitivity analysis
We think the revenue from the vacuum segment and IC equipment revenue growth are the two
critical swing factors for earnings. Our earnings sensitivity analysis for 2018e shows that for
every RMB200m difference in revenue from the vacuum segment, earnings would change by
1.2%; for every 5% difference in IC equipment revenue growth, earnings change by 0.6%, on
our estimates.
Exhibit 103. Sensitivity analysis for 2018e earnings
__________________________ Vacuum revenue (RMBm) __________________________ 100 300 500 700 900
IC equipment revenue growth
28% 164 166 168 170 172 33% 165 167 169 171 173 38% 166 168 170 172 174 43% 168 170 172 174 176 48% 169 171 173 175 177
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Balance sheet and cash flow
Naura had RMB65m in net cash as at the end of 2017. Except for 2015, Naura has consistently
registered a net cash position since listing. Its operating cash flow turned positive in 2017 and
we expect this to continue thanks to an improving margin and working capital cycle.
55
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
We expect 2018-20 capex to be comparable to 2017. The company has already started work on
expanding its new manufacturing facility (phase 2 of the Beijing Yizhuang Economic and
Technology Development Zone). The gross floor area of phase 1 is 40,000 square metres and
phase 2 is much larger at 140,000 sqm. This will enable Naura to operate China’s largest IC
equipment manufacturing base. Accordingly, we expect Naura to be cash flow positive in 2020.
The company has maintained a 10% cash dividend pay-out ratio since 2016.
Exhibit 104. Balance sheet statement
RMBm 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Cash and equivalents 263 213 229 964 1,020 894 871 922 Net receivables 613 608 675 989 1,210 1,536 1,849 2,265 Inventory/stocks 615 566 593 1,178 2,033 2,752 3,255 3,898 Other current assets 85 79 73 215 198 198 198 198 Total Current assets 1,576 1,466 1,570 3,346 4,461 5,380 6,172 7,283 Net PP&E/Fixed assets 552 621 1,007 1,383 1,449 1,550 1,643 1,729 Net intangibles 511 687 1,095 1,061 1,027 982 983 978 Total investments 2 - - - - - - - Other long-term assets 1,105 1,112 508 751 1,209 1,209 1,209 1,209 Total non-current asset 2,170 2,420 2,610 3,195 3,685 3,740 3,835 3,915 Total assets 3,746 3,886 4,180 6,541 8,145 9,120 10,007 11,198 Accounts payable 422 481 533 865 1,333 1,982 2,344 2,807 Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
117 195 339 437 520 520 520 520
Other current liabilities 188 126 163 404 1,130 1,339 1,610 1,939 Current liabilities 727 801 1,035 1,707 2,984 3,841 4,473 5,266 Long-term debt - - - 60 436 400 400 400 Other long-term liabilities/creditors
1,093 1,121 1,117 1,410 1,246 1,246 1,246 1,246
Total long-term liabilities 1,093 1,121 1,117 1,470 1,681 1,646 1,646 1,646 Total liabilities 1,820 1,922 2,153 3,177 4,665 5,486 6,119 6,911 Common stock 352 352 352 458 458 458 458 458 Treasury stock - - - - - - - - Reserve 1,472 1,479 1,518 2,735 2,850 3,004 3,258 3,657 Other common equity (0) (0) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) Total common equity 1,824 1,831 1,869 3,192 3,308 3,461 3,715 4,114 Minority interest 102 133 158 172 173 173 173 173 Total equity 1,926 1,964 2,027 3,364 3,480 3,634 3,888 4,287 Total liabilities and equity 3,746 3,886 4,180 6,541 8,145 9,120 10,007 11,198
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
56
Exhibit 105. Cash flow statement
RMBm 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Net income 103 42 39 93 126 170 282 443 Minority interest and impairment add-back
37 70 68 81 73 57 94 147
Depreciation and amortization add-back
43 67 82 192 198 221 236 250
Investment Loss - (0) - - - - - - (Increase)/decrease in working capital :
(219) (100) (245) (587) (389) (397) (453) (597)
Other operating cash flow items
10 15 13 20 24 - - -
Cash flow from operations
(26) 93 (44) (201) 32 51 159 243
Capital expenditure (166) (196) (67) (178) (232) (230) (230) (230) (Acquisitions)/divestitures 3 0 0 1 0 - - - Investments (2) 2 - - - - - - Other investment cash flow items
- - - - - - - -
Cash flow from investing (164) (194) (67) (178) (232) (230) (230) (230) Dividends paid (45) (27) (19) (49) (62) (48) (51) (63) Share repurchase/issue - - 0 917 - - - - Increase/(decrease) in debt
(90) 78 144 99 332 100 100 100
Other financing cash flow items
(0) - - - (6) - - -
Cash flow from financing (135) 51 125 967 264 52 49 37 Effect of foreign exchange rate changes
(0) 0 0 0 (1) - - -
Total cash flow (326) (50) 15 588 63 (126) (23) 50 Free cash flow (192) (103) (111) (380) (201) (179) (71) 13
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Valuation
We apply a 12m forward price-to-sales (P/S) methodology to value Naura, rather than PE, for
two key reasons. 1) First, Naura’s earnings performance is volatile and largely depends on the
government subsidy. The company is now trading at a high forward PE multiple of 100x, in line
with the mid-cycle 98x but much higher than the industry average. That said, despite the bumpy
earnings trend, we think investors are still willing to apply a valuation premium to Naura. This is
not because of the near-term earnings performance, but due to its long-term growth outlook and
its strategic importance in semiconductor equipment. 2) And second, Naura is still at the early
stage of gaining traction with foundry customers and offers ample revenue growth potential, in
our view.
We forecast accelerated revenue growth – 52% CAGR in 2017-20e, up from 6% in 2010-17.
The stock is trading at 6.8x forward P/S, in line with the shares’ historical mid-cycle average of
6.3x. In light of Naura’s faster revenue growth outlook, we think it is reasonable to apply one
standard deviation above the mid-cycle, hence a target P/S multiple of 8.4x, to set the target
price. This equals RMB63.97, implying 20% upside.
Downside risks
Advanced IC equipment: Naura can produce 28nm and above IC equipment for foundries.
Failure to improve technical know-how and mass produce more advanced nodes may reduce
future growth opportunities.
Solar: The solar industry is highly dependent on government subsidy policies, so changes in
policy may affect order flows. As most of Naura’s vacuum products are sold to Longi, any
change in the customer’s sourcing strategy and operational performance may affect Naura.
57
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Government subsidy and income recognition. Naura’s earnings are sensitive to government
subsidies. Policy changes would create uncertainty about the company’s earnings.
Exhibit 106. Historical 12m forward P/S Exhibit 107. Historical 12m forward PE
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
-
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
20
10
/3
20
10
/9
20
11
/3
20
11
/9
20
12
/3
20
12
/9
20
13
/3
20
13
/9
20
14
/3
20
14
/9
20
15
/3
20
15
/9
20
16
/3
20
16
/9
20
17
/3
20
17
/9
20
18
/3
+1 STD
Mean
-1 STD
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
20
10
/3
20
10
/9
20
11
/3
20
11
/9
20
12
/3
20
12
/9
20
13
/3
20
13
/9
20
14
/3
20
14
/9
20
15
/3
20
15
/9
20
16
/3
20
16
/9
20
17
/3
20
17
/9
20
18
/3
+1 STD
Mean
-1 STD
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
58
Financial statements
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
Profit & loss summary (CNYm)
Revenue 2,223 3,114 3,748 4,593
EBITDA 42 35 233 510
Depreciation & amortisation -198 -221 -236 -250
Operating profit/EBIT -157 -186 -3 260
Net interest -27 -35 -34 -34
PBT 206 279 463 726
HSBC Qianhai PBT 206 279 463 726
Taxation -38 -52 -86 -136
Net profit 126 170 282 443
HSBC Qianhai net profit 126 170 282 443
Cash flow summary (CNYm)
Cash flow from operations 32 51 159 243
Capex -232 -230 -230 -230
Cash flow from investment -232 -230 -230 -230
Dividends -13 -17 -28 -44
Change in net debt 402 91 23 -50
FCF equity -645 -679 -571 -487
Balance sheet summary (CNYm)
Intangible fixed assets 1,027 982 983 978
Tangible fixed assets 2,657 2,758 2,851 2,937
Current assets 4,461 5,380 6,172 7,283
Cash & others 1,020 894 871 922
Total assets 8,145 9,120 10,007 11,198
Operating liabilities 3,709 4,566 5,199 5,991
Gross debt 956 920 920 920
Net debt -65 26 49 -2
Shareholders' funds 3,308 3,461 3,715 4,114
Invested capital 3,416 3,660 3,937 4,285
Ratio, growth and per share analysis
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
Y-o-y % change
Revenue 37.0 40.1 20.4 22.5
EBITDA -15.6 561.4 118.8
Operating profit
PBT 18.2 35.6 65.8 56.8
HSBC Qianhai EPS 24.6 35.6 65.8 56.8
Ratios (%)
Revenue/IC (x) 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1
ROIC -1.8 -2.2 2.1 7.2
ROE 3.9 5.0 7.9 11.3
ROA 2.6 3.0 4.2 5.8
EBITDA margin 1.9 1.1 6.2 11.1
Operating profit margin -7.0 -6.0 -0.1 5.7
EBITDA/net interest (x) 1.6 1.0 6.8 14.8
Net debt/equity -1.9 0.7 1.3 0.0
Net debt/EBITDA (x) -1.5 0.7 0.2 0.0
CF from operations/net debt 196.8 325.7
Per share data (CNY)
EPS Rep (diluted) 0.27 0.37 0.62 0.97
HSBC Qianhai EPS (diluted) 0.27 0.37 0.62 0.97
DPS 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.10
Book value 7.22 7.56 8.11 8.98
Valuation data
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
EV/sales 10.9 7.8 6.5 5.3
EV/EBITDA 582.6 693.0 104.9 47.8
EV/IC 7.1 6.7 6.2 5.7
PE* 194.2 143.2 86.3 55.1
PB 7.4 7.0 6.6 5.9
FCF yield (%) -2.6 -2.8 -2.3 -2.0
Dividend yield (%) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
* Based on HSBC Qianhai EPS (diluted)
Issuer information
Share price (CNY) 53.26 Free float 78%
Target price (CNY) 63.97 Sector Electronic Equipment
Reuters (Equity) 002371.SZ Country China
Bloomberg (Equity) 002371 CH Analyst Frank He
Market cap (USDm) 3,576 Contact +86 755 8898 3136
ESG metrics
Environmental Indicators Governance Indicators
GHG Intensity (kg/USD) na No. of board members 12
Energy Intensity (kWh/USD) na Average board experience (years) 2.9
CO2 reduction policy Yes Female board members (%) 16.7
Social Indicators Board members Independence (%) 33.3
Employee costs as % of sales na
Employee turnover (%) na
Diversity policy Yes
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Price relative
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities Note: Priced at close of 03 Sep 2018
14.00
24.00
34.00
44.00
54.00
64.00
14.00
24.00
34.00
44.00
54.00
64.00
2016 2017 2018
Naura Technology Group Co Rel to CSI 300 Index
Financials & valuation: Naura Technology Group Co Buy
59
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Riding on the smart manufacturing trend
Han’s Laser, established in 1996, provides laser, robotics and automation equipment and
system solutions in smart precision manufacturing industries in China. Its product portfolio
includes laser labelling/cutting/welding equipment, PCB/LED/semiconductor special equipment,
robots, automation equipment and system solutions. The products are mainly used in metal or
non-metal processing of consumer electronics, automobiles, shipbuilding, aerospace, rail
transportation, electrical vehicle (EV) batteries, PCB, appliance industries. Its key customers
include Apple, Samsung, BOE, Yutong Bus, and Shennan Circuits. The company was listed on
the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2004.
In the last 30 year Han’s Laser has moved steadily up the value chain after starting as a
manufacturer of low-power laser equipment. It now serves dozens of industries and is the
market share leader in laser processing equipment in China. Over 2004-17, it achieved a 29%
revenue CAGR and 32% net profit CAGR.
Exhibit 108. Corporate milestones
Year Events
1996 Develops and manufactures low-power laser labelling equipment 2000 Extends downstream application from traditional leather, garment, electronics to other industries like jewellery, home
appliances 2004 Listed on Shenzhen Stock Exchange; starts low-power laser cutting/welding equipment and platemaking printing
equipment business 2005 Starts PCB equipment business 2009 Starts LED and solar equipment business; become a supplier to Apple with 70% laser equipment allocation in 2017 2010 Starts high-power laser equipment business 2012 Changes strategy to focus on laser processing business and large customers, starts to spin off non-core businesses
like solar, platemaking printing equipment business 2014 Starts robotics business in a bid to provide integrated automation solutions to customers; low-power laser equipment
market extends to display panel, EV battery industries 2015 Starts in-house supply of part of low-power laser and picosecond laser source; high-power laser equipment market
extends to auto, aviation, shipping industries 2017 Starts semiconductor equipment business through acquisition of Fortrend Engineering
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
The core business can be separated into laser processing equipment and industry special
equipment. Laser processing equipment, representing 81% of revenue in 2017, can be further
categorized as low-power and high-power. Low-power laser equipment revenue streams are
generated from equipment orders by Apple, the EV battery industry, and the display panel
industry. Special equipment covers PCB, LED manufacturing and the company aims to gain
more exposure in the semiconductor industry.
Han’s Laser (002008 CH)
Multiple revenue growth drivers with a diversified customer base
Margin upside on growing in-house laser manufacturing
Initiate with a Buy rating and target price of RMB50.59
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
60
Exhibit 109. Historical revenue/net profit Exhibit 110. Revenue breakdown in 2017
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Historical gross profit margin and operating profit margins are about 40% and 12% respectively.
Margin expansion in 2017 was driven by high-margin Apple business and enhanced operating
efficiency. The gross profit margin of low-power laser equipment is higher than for high-power
as the company makes some critical pieces of equipment, such as the laser source, in-house.
Exhibit 111. GPM trend by segment Exhibit 112. GPM and EBIT margin trend
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Han’s Laser attaches great importance to R&D, and the ratio of R&D expense to revenue has
consistently remained above 5% (it was 7.4% in 2017). The company has nearly 4,000 R&D
staff, 32% of total employees, covering laser source, automation system integration, linear
motor, visual recognition, software, and mechanical controls. By the end of 2017, the company
had obtained 2,486 patents, nearly ten times more than ten years ago. We believe the high
level of R&D investment will help the company improve its competitiveness and maintain its
market leader position in the long run.
Laser industry overview
Light is passed through a lens to form a laser beam with extremely high energy density. The
material (including metal and non-metal) is cut, welded, surface treated, and punched using the
characteristics of interaction between the laser beam and the material.
Compared to traditional methods, laser processing has advantages such as no contact process,
and high positioning accuracy; it’s also quiet and clean. Laser technology plays an increasingly
important role in improving product quality, labour productivity, automation, reducing pollution,
and material consumption.
The laser industry supply chain is composed of laser material/component manufacturers, laser
source manufacturers, and laser equipment manufacturers. Upstream are the optical materials,
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Low-power equipment High-power equipment
PCB equipment LED Equipment
Laser printing equipment Others
(Rmb m)
High-power laser equipment
18%
PCB equipment
10%
LED Equipment
5%
Others4%
Apple35%
Display panel4%
EV battery
5%Others19%
Low-power laser
equipment63%
40.3%
44.1%
41.5%
42.7%
28.5%
31.4% 30.9%29.4%
39.1% 38.8%
36.3%
37.6%
22.5%23.6%
27.8%
31.5%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
2013 2014 2015 2016
Low-power equipment High-power equipmentPCB equipment LED Equipment
41.0%39.2%
44.2%
36.2%
39.6%37.9% 38.2%
41.3%
10.9% 11.3%13.9%
8.0%
13.0%10.1% 9.5%
16.2%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Gross margin EBIT margin
61
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
optical components, mechanical and numerical control components. Optical materials include
laser crystal material, and special optical fiber. Optical components include laser optics,
galvanometers, modulators, and laser processing heads; others include mechanical, numerical
control, and power supply equipment.
The laser source is the critical part of laser equipment. By power, the laser source can be categorised
as low-power (<1.5KW) and high power (>1.5KW). By pump energy source, they can be
classified into CO2, YAG, fiber, and semiconductor lasers. The laser source can also be divided
into continuous laser and pulsed laser. According to pulse width, the pulsed laser can be further
divided into millisecond, microsecond, nanosecond, picosecond, and femtosecond lasers.
Mid-stream laser equipment that can be used in multiple downstream industries such as
machinery, automobiles, aerospace, steel, shipbuilding, electronics and military.
Exhibit 113. Laser equipment supply chain
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities
China is the hot spot
According to Optech Consulting, the global market for laser systems for materials processing
reached USD12.6bn in 2016, a 5% CAGR since 2006. As the world’s factory, China is the main
laser system market. China is also the main growth contributor thanks to macroeconomic
development, manufacturing upgrades, and policy support.
According to laser.ofweek.com, a professional laser industry portal, the sale of laser system
(including imports) in China for the industry manufacturing, communication, medical and scientific
research was RMB42.2bn in 2016, a 23% CAGR since 2010. Of this, the laser systems for materials
processing is an important segment with a market of about RMB25bn in 2015.
According to Optech Consulting, the high-power (>1.5kW) laser system, mainly used in the
automobile, shipbuilding and machinery industries, represents 75% of the market. The
remaining 25% is for low-power (<1.5kW), mainly used in the microelectronics, semiconductor
and display industries.
Optical
component
Numerical
control systemServo motor Auxiliary gas
Laser source
CO2 laser
source
Solid-state
laser source
Fiber laser
source
Other laser
sources
Laser cutting Laser labelingLaser
communicationLaser welding
Military Mechanical TelecomMetallurgyAviationAutomobileElectronics
Up-stream core
components
Mid-stream
equipment
Down-stream
industries
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
62
Exhibit 114. Global laser system market size Exhibit 115. China laser system market size
Source: Optech Consulting, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Ofweek, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Lowering costs to stimulate demand
The laser source is the core part of laser equipment. It accounts for 30-40% of the cost of low-
power laser equipment, rising to nearly 60% for high power as only a few companies, including
IPG, SPI, and Coherent, have the technological know-how.
Fiber laser, the third generation laser source noted for high efficiency levels and low
maintenance costs, is gaining market share. The price has decreased 50% since 2012 as a
result of a higher localization rate in China. We expect the cost will continue to fall as
localization increases.
China high-power laser source producers are making technical breakthroughs. For instance,
Wuhan Raycus developed the first 6kW fiber laser source in 2017. As costs fall and
manufacturing upgrades continue, we believe laser equipment demand will remain robust.
Moreover, the combination of laser equipment and automation is improving product quality,
production efficiency and reducing labour costs. We think the system integration of laser and
automation will become a mainstream trend.
Exhibit 116. Fiber laser source localization rate
Exhibit 117. Fiber laser source price
Source: Zhixun Consulting, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Zhixun Consulting, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Han’s Laser: market share
In the global market, Trumpf is the market share leader in the laser processing industry with
30%, followed by Coherent, Han’s Laser, and IPG. As Han’s Laser’s 2017 sales exceeded
RMB10bn, we estimate its global market share is now above 10%. Trumpf has over 50% gross
margin because of its vertically-integrated business model (from laser source to integrated
automation solutions). IPG also achieves a gross margin of over 50% by leveraging its nearly
70% market share in the high-power fiber laser source market.
7.7
8.79.4
5.2
7.9
10.0 10.210.7
11.8 11.812.6
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
(USDbn)5% CAGR
9.711.7
16.919.5
26.0
34.5
38.5
42.2
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
23% CAGR
(RMB bn)
72%
63%
68%
89%
17%
27%
42%
58%
1% 1% 4%7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2013 2014 2015 2016
Low-power (<100W) Mid-power (100W-1.5kW) High-power (>1.5kW)
7.5 10.5 12
68
90
145
3.5 4.5 6.7
65
103
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
10W 20W 30W 500W 1000W 2000W
2012 2016
(RMB 10000)
63
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
In China, Han’s Laser has a 35-45% market share in both the high-power and low power laser
equipment markets. Compared with foreign players, Han’s Laser has advantages in term of
product cost performance, customization capability, sales service network and close
relationships with local clients. Trumpf, the global market leader, has a 25-35% market share in
China behind Han’s Laser.
Besides Han’s, other well-known domestic laser equipment makers include GreatStar Industrial
( ), HG Tech ( ), Tianqi Laser ( ), He Laser ( ), Golden Laser
( ), and Delphi Laser ( ). At the low end of the market there are
thousands of laser equipment makers which lack core technology.
Exhibit 118. Market share breakdown in 2016 Exhibit 119. Top players’ GPM comparison
Source: Ofweek, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Bloomberg, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Low-power laser: new design of consumer electronics and new downstream industries
Han’s Laser’s low-power equipment segment can be separated into IT, display panel, EV
battery and others.
IT
Han’s Laser’s key clients in IT industries are smartphone makers and their component
suppliers. The main applications include laser labelling, drilling, cutting, and welding. Typical
applications for smartphone exteriors include logo labelling, laser drilling, home key cutting,
camera lens cutting, screen cutting, and LDS laser direct molding. Typical applications for
smartphones include PCB/FPC laser cutting, labelling, middle frame drilling, welding, cutting,
battery labelling, and conductive glass laser etching.
Apple is the single big client, accounting for 35% of total revenue or 55% of low-power laser
equipment segment in 2017. New material, new appearance, utilization enhancement, better quality
and environmental protection are the key reasons for smartphone makers to adopt laser processing.
For instance, the latest iPhone X model includes several innovations, including an AMOLED full
screen, double-side 2.5 glass + stainless steel middle frame, wireless charging, 3D face sensing,
stereo effect, and waterproofing, which have driven demand for laser equipment.
Consumer electronics is another growth factor. For instance, using FPC design helps make devices
smaller (laser cutting is needed for FPC manufacturing). Other processes such as
picosecond/femtosecond lasers, small structure welding on middle metal frame, laser cleaning
process to remove metal frame PVD coating, and waterproof testing equipment, will also drive the
demand for laser equipment. In addition, with the increasing adoption of 2.5/3D glasses + metal
middle frame in the 5G era, we see a potential market for laser equipment in the Android camp.
Trumpf30%
Han's Laser8%
IPG6%
Coherent (including
Rofin)13%
Jenoptik6%
Cymer7%
Prima Industrie4%
Bystronic3%
Others23%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%
60.0%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Trumpf Han's Laser Coherent IPG
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
64
Display panels
Display panels are China’s fourth largest import by value after integrated circuits, oil and iron
ore. Domestic substitute demand has been accelerating in recent years. Panel makers led by
BOE began to increase their investment scale, and China’s TFT-LCD and AMOLED panel
production capacity gradually increased. According to WitsView estimates, China officially
surpassed South Korea to become the largest supply area for large-size panels in 2017, and
the supply rate in mainland China will move toward 50% by 2020. According to our estimates,
investment in panel production lines will exceed RMB400bn in the next two years.
Most of the laser equipment for new OLED lines in China is imported from South Korea and
Japan. The penetration rate of domestically produced equipment is very low. In order to reduce
costs, we expect the localization rate will gradually increase. Han’s Laser’s OLED equipment
includes laser stripping equipment (LLO), flexible cutting machine, and laser repair equipment.
The four production lines planned by BOE are currently being tested exclusively by Han’s Laser,
and the management aims to start shipments in 2018.
Exhibit 120. Large-size LCD panel capacity distribution by region
Exhibit 121. BOE LCD+AMOLED capacity area expansion
Source: WitsView, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: IHS, HSBC Qianhai Securities
EV battery
According to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology’s (MIIT) “Technology
Roadmap for Energy Saving and New Energy Vehicles,” by 2025, new energy vehicles will
account for more than 20% of total vehicle sales units. This will clearly drive the demand for EV
batteries. MIIT said the total capacity of the battery industry will exceed 100Gwh by 2020, a
34% CAGR from 2017, implying that over RMB50bn of equipment investment is needed in the
next three years. To improve the safety, reliability and lifespan of batteries, laser welding
technology is becoming an industrial trend in battery production.
By setting up new energy business unit/subsidiaries, and external acquisitions, Han’s Laser is
now able to produce equipment for the entire battery manufacturing process (cathode, anode,
coating, laser welding, testing, injection, and packaging). Key clients include CATL, Guoxuan
High-tech ( ), Lishen Battery ( ), China Aviation Lithium Battery ( ) and EVE
Battery ( ). Given the scale of downstream capacity expansion plans, we expect the
growth of the EV battery segment to remain robust.
PCB: benefits from production capacity relocation to China
The global value of the PCB industry’s output is now USD60bn, accounting for more than a
quarter of the total output value of the electronic components industry. Due to China’s huge
domestic market, and the advantages of lower labour costs and better industrial support, more
global PCB production capacity has shifted to China since 2000. In 2006, mainland China
surpassed Japan to become the largest PCB manufacturer in the world.
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2015 2016 2017e 2018e 2019e 2020e
Korea Taiwan China Japan US
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017e 2018e 2019e
BOE Capacity Yoy
(milliom m2)
65
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 122. Global PCB market Exhibit 123. PCB production output by region
Source: Prismark, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Prismark, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Han’s Laser has a full spectrum of PCB equipment, covering the entire manufacturing process,
including exposure, mechanical/laser drilling, mechanical/laser molding, electrical
measurement, and automatic optic inspection (AOI) testing. It is the first-tier supplier of local
leading PCB producers such as SCC ( ), Suntak ( ), and Kinwong ( ).
Meanwhile, the company is gaining recognition from foreign PCB producers such as WUS (
), Tripod-tech ( ), and Zhen Ding Tech ( ).
Over the past 10 years, Han’s Laser PCB segment has registered a 20% revenue CAGR,
higher than the industry average. We believe the PCB segment will continue to outperform,
driven by production capacity expansion of local PCB producers. For example, SCC aims to
increase capacity to 1.64m sqm by end of 2018, up from 1.30m sqm in 2017.
High-power laser – a blue sky market
The high-power laser system market is emerging as an enhancement to traditional punching
machines and resistance welding equipment. It is already being used in the automobile,
aerospace and military industries, and other industrial applications. According to chyxx.com (
), the traditional punching equipment market is worth about RMB20-30bn and traditional
resistance welding equipment over RMB60bn. Although laser processing has various
advantages, such as high accuracy/flexibility, short processing time and less processing
consumables, it still at the early stage of development.
In 2017, nearly 90% of Han’s Laser high-power laser system revenue was generated from
cutting equipment, and the rest from welding equipment. Downstream clients include SAIC,
FAW, Yutong and Kinglong Bus from the automobile industry, and Xingguan ( ),
Zhongnong Boyuan ( ), XCMG ( ) from agricultural machinery, and AVIC (
) from aerospace. Looking ahead, we expect the company’s high-power segment to remain
high growth based on the improving affordability of downstream clients and low penetration rate,
particularly for local automobile OEMs.
The automobile industry is one of the largest markets for high-power laser welding equipment.
According to chyxx.com ( ), China’s auto manufacturing equipment market is now worth
over RMB150bn, of which welding equipment accounts for about 25%, so the addressable
market for laser welding in the automobile industry alone is nearly RMB40bn. As the first mover,
Trumpf is the market leader in the automobile industry, and while Han’s Laser is making
progress the contribution to revenue is still minimal. In 2016, the company delivered laser
welding integrated solutions for Audi, BMW and Mercedes Benz.
Besides heavy industry, high-power laser processing is starting to be used in consumer
electronics such as the metal frame of smartphones. The metal material utilization rate of
traditional CNC punching is about 80%, and it is about 95% for high-power laser processing.
Han’s Laser has shipped a few samples to Apple for testing, and we expect this high-power
project with Apple to materialise in 2019.
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Global PCB market size Yoy
(USDbn)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
China Japan Asia ex. China and Japan North America Europe
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
66
Vertical integration to improve margin
Given the importance of the laser source, in-house supply capability is critical for competiveness
and margin improvement. In order to minimise the impact from IPG, the dominant fiber laser
source supplier, Trumpf acquired SPI’s laser source business segment in 2008. Other
equipment makers like Jenoptik and Coherent have also entered the fiber laser source market.
Han’s Laser has been putting great emphasis on laser source development. According to
management, 50% of low-power fiber laser source is now made in-house, and high-power fiber
laser source in-house supply will materialise in 2018. In 2016, Han’s Laser acquired Coractive
High-Tech, a special fiber producer in Canada. The special fiber is a core component for
producing fiber laser source. Recently, the company completed an RMB230m convertible bond
issuance, of which RMB150m will be invested in high-power laser cutting and welding system
projects. This suggests that the company is committed to closing the technology gap with IPG.
Entering the semiconductor industry by acquisition
In 2016, Han’s Laser acquired an 80% stake in Fortrend Engineering, a leading supplier of
solutions of bulk wafer transfer, standard mechanical interface (SMIF), ultra-cleaning
automation, and wafer surface heat treatment in IC fabrication. Fortrend was established in the
US in 1979, and has two manufacturing facilities in Xinzhu, Taiwan and Shenyang, China. Its
client portfolio includes TSMC, Intel, UMC, Applied Materials, Micron and Tower. It provides
wafer transport, wafer cure oven systems, and wafer sorter systems.
Fortrend recorded sales of nearly RMB200m in 2017, according to management. Han’s Laser
aims to cross-sell its laser equipment and automation solution to Fortrend’s existing clients. We
expect Han’s Laser to gain market share by gaining new customers such as SMIC and JCET.
Forecasts and valuation
Earnings forecasts
We forecast a 36% net profit CAGR during 2018-20e, driven by a 32% revenue CAGR, margin
expansion through vertical integration, as well as operating leverage.
We believe laser equipment will continue to be Han’s Laser’s revenue driver, with a 32%
revenue CAGR (high-power equipment 45% CAGR, low-power equipment 27% CAGR). We
expect PCB equipment to have a 30% revenue CAGR and semiconductor equipment to achieve
a 70% revenue CAGR in 2018-20e, albeit from a low base. As a result, we expect laser
equipment will account for 77% of total revenue in 2020e, down from 81% in 2017.
We expect the gross margin of high-power equipment will improve from 26% in 2017 to 30% in
2020e thanks to vertical integration for the laser source business. As the gross margin of high-power
is still lower than other segments, the overall gross margin will fall slightly from 41.3% in 2017 to
40.1% in 2020e as the high-power segment expands. We expect the SG&A to revenue ratio to
decline over time as the company is promoting automation in its manufacturing facilities.
Exhibit 124. Forecast of revenues from Apple
RMBm 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e CAGR 18-20e
Labelling equipment 650 1,500 1,000 1,200 1,200 10% Welding equipment 300 1,500 1,000 1,500 1,500 22% Cutting equipment 300 500 500 800 800 26% Automation solution 350 500 500 500 500 0% High-power equipment 100 1500 1500 287% Total 1,600 4,000 3,100 5,500 5,500 33%
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
67
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 125. Revenue and profit forecast by segment
RMBm 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e CAGR 18-20e
Revenue Laser equipment 3,769 3,847 5,149 9,319 10,099 14,951 17,660 32% Low-power equipment 2,915 2,917 3,690 7,245 7,303 9,946 11,779 27% High-power equipment 854 929 1,459 2,074 2,796 5,005 5,881 45% PCB equipment 589 707 890 1,210 1,816 2,360 3,068 30% LED Equipment 618 343 482 540 594 654 719 10% Semiconductor 400 720 1,152 70% Laser printing equipment 212 158 102 Others 378 533 336 490 305 320 336 5% Total 5,566 5,587 6,959 11,560 13,214 19,005 22,935 32% Gross profit Laser equipment 1,553 1,438 2,006 3,870 3,895 5,877 7,065 35% Low-power equipment 1,285 1,173 1,577 3,333 3,140 4,476 5,300 30% High-power equipment 268 265 429 539 755 1,401 1,764 53% PCB equipment 229 257 335 460 654 873 1,135 32% LED Equipment 146 95 152 184 203 223 245 10% Semiconductor 200 360 576 70% Laser printing equipment 38 14 4 Others 239 311 164 257 152 160 168 5% Total 2,204 2,115 2,661 4,771 5,104 7,493 9,189 34% Gross margin Laser equipment 41.2% 37.4% 39.0% 41.5% 38.6% 39.3% 40.0% Low-power equipment 44.1% 40.2% 42.7% 46.0% 43.0% 45.0% 45.0% High-power equipment 31.4% 28.5% 29.4% 26.0% 27.0% 28.0% 30.0% PCB equipment 38.8% 36.3% 37.6% 38.0% 36.0% 37.0% 37.0% LED Equipment 23.6% 27.8% 31.5% 34.1% 34.1% 34.1% 34.1% Semiconductor 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Laser printing equipment 17.8% 8.9% 3.6% Others 63.3% 58.4% 48.9% 52.5% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Total 39.6% 37.9% 38.2% 41.3% 38.6% 39.4% 40.1%
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Sensitivity analysis
We think low-power laser equipment revenue from Apple and high-power laser equipment
revenue growth are the two critical swing factors for earnings. Our earnings sensitivity analysis
for 2018e shows that for every RMB500m difference in low-power laser equipment revenue
from Apple, earnings would change by 4.9%; for every 10% difference in high-power laser
equipment revenue growth, earnings would change by 0.4%, on our estimates.
Exhibit 126. Sensitivity analysis for 2018e earnings
______ Low-power laser equipment revenue from Apple (RMBm) _______ 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
High-power laser equipment revenue growth
16% 1,762 1,849 1,936 2,024 2,111 26% 1,769 1,857 1,944 2,031 2,118 36% 1,777 1,864 1,951 2,038 2,125 46% 1,784 1,871 1,958 2,045 2,133 56% 1,791 1,878 1,966 2,053 2,140
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Balance sheet and cash flow
Han’s Laser had net cash of RMB151m at the end of 2017. The company’s operating cash flow
has largely met its capex needs over the past few years. We expect the company’s free cash
flow to increase from RMB984m in 2017 to RMB2.8bn in 2020e, driven by strong earnings
growth and flat capex. Han’s Laser is building a new production facility which it is describing as
its “Global laser smart manufacturing base” in Shenzhen’s Baoan district. Capex planned is
RMB2bn and the project is scheduled to be completed in 2019. After completion, Han’s Laser’s
production capacity will increase by 200% to meet its capacity needs before 2022. On dividend
policy, Han’s Laser maintained its cash dividend at RMB0.20/share over 2011-17, and we
believe there is upside potential, in line with the growth in free cash flow.
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
68
Exhibit 127. Balance sheet statement
RMBm 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Cash and equivalents 797 1,018 696 846 2,325 5,111 5,730 7,959 Net receivables 1,638 1,924 2,086 2,754 4,084 4,706 6,769 8,169 Inventory/stocks 1,619 1,442 1,697 1,845 2,290 2,666 3,785 4,519 Other current assets 53 271 117 122 194 213 234 258 Total Current assets 4,107 4,656 4,596 5,567 8,894 12,697 16,518 20,905 Net PP&E/Fixed assets 1,267 1,268 1,305 1,543 1,371 2,120 2,819 3,004 Net intangibles 188 189 193 814 752 810 874 944 Total investments 724 628 816 1,453 1,672 1,672 1,672 1,672 Other long-term assets 352 455 672 993 1,415 1,497 1,455 1,398 Total non-current asset 2,531 2,540 2,987 4,803 5,209 6,098 6,819 7,018 Total assets 6,638 7,196 7,582 10,370 14,103 18,795 23,337 27,923 Accounts payable 1,275 1,476 1,738 2,825 3,785 4,444 6,308 7,532 Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
1,026 978 299 1,282 1,833 1,833 1,833 1,833
Other current liabilities 156 207 219 294 545 545 545 545 Current liabilities 2,457 2,660 2,256 4,401 6,163 6,822 8,686 9,910 Long-term debt 187 80 246 193 341 2,641 2,841 3,041 Other long-term liabilities/creditors
105 136 169 227 315 315 315 315
Total long-term liabilities 292 216 415 421 656 2,956 3,156 3,356 Total liabilities 2,749 2,876 2,670 4,821 6,819 9,778 11,842 13,267 Common stock 1,052 1,056 1,063 1,067 1,067 1,067 1,067 1,067 Treasury stock - - - - - - - - Reserve 2,536 3,069 3,677 4,239 5,914 7,648 10,126 13,287 Other common equity (9) - - - - - - - Total common equity 3,579 4,125 4,740 5,306 6,981 8,715 11,193 14,354 Minority interest 309 195 172 242 302 302 302 302 Total equity 3,888 4,320 4,912 5,548 7,284 9,017 11,495 14,657 Total liabilities and equity 6,638 7,196 7,582 10,370 14,103 18,795 23,337 27,923
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
69
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 128. Cash flow statement
RMBm 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Net income 549 708 747 754 1,665 1,947 2,770 3,577 Minority interest and impairment add-back
41 53 57 88 156 150 150 150
Depreciation and amortization add-back
119 131 131 149 169 190 244 261
Investment Loss (223) (45) (39) (23) 17 (207) (50) (50) (Increase)/decrease in working capital :
76 48 (301) (195) (221) (339) (1,317) (910)
Other operating cash flow items
101 63 (55) 23 187 187 187 187
Cash flow from operations
663 958 539 796 1,974 1,928 1,984 3,215
Capital expenditure (189) (263) (315) (709) (989) (900) (900) (400) (Acquisitions)/divestitures 254 2 1 1 6 - - - Investments (27) 53 (38) (358) (16) (100) (100) (100) Other investment cash flow items
13 (136) 174 (260) 40 - - -
Cash flow from investing 50 (344) (178) (1,326) (960) (1,000) (1,000) (500) Dividends paid (301) (287) (263) (271) (292) (292) (416) (537) Share repurchase/issue 42 34 43 60 5 - - - Increase/(decrease) in debt
(140) (123) (498) 906 896 2,300 200 200
Other financing cash flow items
8 (119) 149 (214) (146) (150) (150) (150)
Cash flow from financing (391) (494) (570) 481 464 1,858 (366) (487) Effect of foreign exchange rate changes
(7) (14) 13 12 (33) - - -
Total cash flow 316 107 (197) (36) 1,444 2,786 619 2,229 Free cash flow 473 695 223 88 984 1,028 1,084 2,815
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Valuation
We apply a 12m forward PE to value Han’s Laser. We project a net profit CAGR of 29% over
2017-20e, in line with the 32% CAGR during 2008-17. We think it is reasonable to apply a mid-
cycle valuation of 22x for the stock, which translates into our target price of RMB50.59, implying
18% upside. With the growing diversification of the customer base and a solid earnings growth
outlook, we believe our target multiple valuation and Buy rating are justified.
Downside risks
Apple’s innovation progress is slower than expected. In general, smartphone innovation in
new design and new processing technology will generate demand for laser equipment. If
Apple’s innovation progress is slower than expected, it may cut its laser equipment orders from
Han’s Laser.
Laser source import substitution progress is slower than expected. Han’s Laser aims to
start high-power laser source in-house supply from 2018. If there is any delay, margin
improvement may be hard to achieve.
Regulatory changes in component sourcing policy. Han’s Laser focuses on late-stage
assembly and relies on external sourcing of various components such as fiber laser source.
Failure to secure those key component presents a downside risk to Han’s Laser’s sales.
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
70
Exhibit 129. Historical 12m forward PE Exhibit 130. Historical 12m forward PB
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
2010
/1
2010
/7
2011
/1
2011
/7
2012
/1
2012
/7
2013
/1
2013
/7
2014
/1
2014
/7
2015
/1
2015
/7
2016
/1
2016
/7
2017
/1
2017
/7
2018
/1
2018
/7
+1 STD
Mean
-1 STD
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
20
10
/1
20
10
/7
20
11
/1
20
11
/7
20
12
/1
20
12
/7
20
13
/1
20
13
/7
20
14
/1
20
14
/7
20
15
/1
20
15
/7
20
16
/1
20
16
/7
20
17
/1
20
17
/7
20
18
/1
20
18
/7
+1 STD
Mean
-1 STD
71
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Financial statements
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
Profit & loss summary (CNYm)
Revenue 11,560 13,214 19,005 22,935
EBITDA 2,045 2,160 3,368 4,313
Depreciation & amortisation -169 -190 -244 -261
Operating profit/EBIT 1,876 1,969 3,124 4,052
Net interest -222 -131 -152 -153
PBT 1,786 2,295 3,242 4,169
HSBC Qianhai PBT 1,786 2,295 3,242 4,169
Taxation -76 -298 -421 -542
Net profit 1,665 1,947 2,770 3,577
HSBC Qianhai net profit 1,665 1,947 2,770 3,577
Cash flow summary (CNYm)
Cash flow from operations 1,974 1,928 1,984 3,215
Capex -989 -900 -900 -400
Cash flow from investment -960 -1,000 -1,000 -500
Dividends -213 -292 -416 -537
Change in net debt -780 -486 -419 -2,029
FCF equity 538 491 577 2,308
Balance sheet summary (CNYm)
Intangible fixed assets 752 810 874 944
Tangible fixed assets 2,786 3,617 4,274 4,402
Current assets 8,894 12,697 16,518 20,905
Cash & others 2,325 5,111 5,730 7,959
Total assets 14,103 18,795 23,337 27,923
Operating liabilities 4,645 5,304 7,168 8,392
Gross debt 2,174 4,474 4,674 4,874
Net debt -151 -637 -1,056 -3,085
Shareholders' funds 6,981 8,715 11,193 14,354
Invested capital 5,461 6,708 8,767 9,900
Ratio, growth and per share analysis
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
Y-o-y % change
Revenue 66.1 14.3 43.8 20.7
EBITDA 152.1 5.6 56.0 28.1
Operating profit 183.4 5.0 58.6 29.7
PBT 106.0 28.5 41.3 28.6
HSBC Qianhai EPS 119.7 16.9 42.3 29.1
Ratios (%)
Revenue/IC (x) 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.5
ROIC 35.9 28.7 35.6 38.2
ROE 27.1 24.8 27.8 28.0
ROA 15.7 12.8 14.0 14.7
EBITDA margin 17.7 16.3 17.7 18.8
Operating profit margin 16.2 14.9 16.4 17.7
EBITDA/net interest (x) 9.2 16.4 22.2 28.2
Net debt/equity -2.1 -7.1 -9.2 -21.0
Net debt/EBITDA (x) -0.1 -0.3 -0.3 -0.7
CF from operations/net debt
Per share data (CNY)
EPS Rep (diluted) 1.56 1.82 2.60 3.35
HSBC Qianhai EPS (diluted) 1.56 1.82 2.60 3.35
DPS 0.20 0.27 0.39 0.50
Book value 6.54 8.17 10.49 13.45
Valuation data
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
EV/sales 3.8 3.3 2.3 1.8
EV/EBITDA 21.4 20.1 12.7 9.5
EV/IC 8.0 6.5 4.9 4.1
PE* 27.4 23.4 16.5 12.8
PB 6.5 5.2 4.1 3.2
FCF yield (%) 1.2 1.1 1.3 5.2
Dividend yield (%) 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.2
* Based on HSBC Qianhai EPS (diluted)
Issuer information
Share price (CNY) 42.77 Free float 93%
Target price (CNY) 50.59 Sector Electronic Equipment
Reuters (Equity) 002008.SZ Country China
Bloomberg (Equity) 002008 CH Analyst Frank He
Market cap (USDm) 6,690 Contact +86 755 8898 3136
ESG metrics
Environmental Indicators Governance Indicators
GHG Intensity (kg/USD) na No. of board members 10
Energy Intensity (kWh/USD) na Average board experience (years) 9.7
CO2 reduction policy Yes Female board members (%) 30
Social Indicators Board members Independence (%) 40
Employee costs as % of sales na
Employee turnover (%) na
Diversity policy Yes
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Price relative
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities Note: Priced at close of 03 Sep 2018
12.00
22.00
32.00
42.00
52.00
62.00
12.00
22.00
32.00
42.00
52.00
62.00
2016 2017 2018
Hans Laser Technology Ind Rel to CSI 300 Index
Financials & valuation: Hans Laser Technology Ind Buy
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
72
The pioneer of China’s semiconductor industry
Tongfu Microelectronics was founded in 1997 and listed in 2007. The company, headquartered
in Jiangsu, Nantong, engages in the IC packaging and testing business. By revenue, the
company is ranked seventh among global OSATs and third in China. Tongfu has advanced
packaging platforms, including Bumping, WLCSP, FC, BGA and SiP; traditional packaging
platforms include QFN, QFP, and DIP, as well as automotive electronics, and MEMS packaging
solutions. It also provides wafer testing and system final testing services.
The company is the first domestic packaging and testing company to achieve back-end
processes for the mass production of 12-inch 28nm mobile phone processors, including
Bumping, Circuit Probing, Flip Chip, and Final Test. Its products are widely used in high-end
processors (CPU, GPU), memory, mobile terminals, the Internet of Things, power modules, and
automotive electronics.
Exhibit 131. Tongfu’s corporate development
Year Events
1997 Nantong Fujitsu was founded. Huada and Fujitsu take 60% and 40% respectively. 2007 Nantong Fujitsu was listed on A-share market. 2009 Became the first domestic company providing BGA packaging; obtained LQFP and Bumping technology from Fujitsu;
became the supplier of Toshiba. 2010 Set up the first wafer-level bumping production line. Completed additional A-share public offering. Became the supplier
of Texas Instruments. 2011 Developed high-density bumping technology and applied it to high-end chips such as CPU and GPU. Established
cooperation with Teramikros (formerly Casio Micro) on WLP advanced packaging technology. 2012 Obtained Cu Pillar bumping technology from Fujitsu, which is critical for advanced tech node IC packaging 2014 Achieved strategic cooperation with a well-known domestic design company; became the supplier of MediaTek. 2015 Completed private placement and acquired 85% stake of two AMD packaging fabs in Suzhou and Penang 2016 Sutong and Hefei fabs were put into operation; renamed as “Tongfu Micro”; became the supplier of Huawei,
Spreadtrum, ZTE, Samsung, Broadcom, Socionext. 2017 Invested in Xiamen fab; signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Infineon 2018 Fujitsu sold its stake to Huada, National Big Fund, and local industry fund. Signed a strategic cooperation agreement
with Loongon; Became the supplier of domestic DRAM manufacturer Hefei Ruili
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Tongfu began life as a joint venture between Nantong Huada and Fujitsu (China). Through
acquisitions and co-development with Japanese companies, Tongfu gradually mastered industry-
leading packaging technologies. The company has become the qualified packaging and testing
supplier for domestic and foreign semiconductor companies such as Broadcom, MediaTek,
Tongfu Microelectronics
(002156 CH)
A top 3 OSAT supplier with a high-quality customer base
Benefiting from the robust growth of AMD, MediaTek and Bitmain
Initiate with Buy rating and 12m target price of RMB12.05
73
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
STMicroelectronics, Texas Instruments, Toshiba, Fuji Electric, Huawei, HiSilicon, and Spreadtrum.
Five of the world’s top 10 fabless IC design houses are clients of the company.
Exhibit 132. Tongfu’s client portfolio Exhibit 133. Revenue breakdown by client
Europe, US Japan, Korea, Taiwan
Mainland China
AMD MediaTek Spreadtrum Texas Instruments Realtek RDA Infineon Fujitsu Leadcore STMicro Renesas Silan Micro NXP Ricoh Hisilicon freescale Toshiba Goodix On Semi Rohm Semi Nationz Tech Micronas Niko-sem BCD Semi Fairchild Semi Spansion
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
As a part of the global semiconductor supply chain, the growth profile of Tongfu is highly correlated
with the global semiconductor market. After suffering due to the global financial crisis in 2008 and
2009, the global semiconductor market recorded a strong recovery in 2010. Between 2012 and
2015, Tongfu’s growth was driven by product mix enhancement and improving the client base. The
revenue contribution from high-margin advanced packaging platforms has now reached 60-70%. In
2016 and 2017, in order to cope with the rapid development of the domestic semiconductor industry,
the company expanded the scale of its business through acquisitions and capex.
Exhibit 134. Tongfu historical revenue trend
Exhibit 135. Tongfu historical net profit trend
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
The company has facilities in Nantong Sutong Technology Industrial Park, Anhui Hefei and
Xiamen Haicang district, and has built new fabs at Sutong, Hefei and Xiamen. In April 2016,
with the support of the national “Big Fund”, Tongfu acquired an 85% stake in AMD’s Suzhou
and Penang fabs (AMD still holds 15%) for USD370.6m. The deal was completed in two stages.
First, Tongfu and the Big Fund provided 22.5% and 62.5% of the amount in cash, respectively.
In the second stage, completed in December 2017, Tongfu acquired the Big Fund’s 62.5%
stake through a private placement. As a result, 85% of profits from Suzhou and Penang fabs will
absorbed by Tongfu from January 2018.
AMD45%
MediaTek10%
STMicroelectronics6%
Texas Instruments
4%
Infineon4%
Others31%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
(RMBm)
-100%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
(RMBm)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
74
AMD’s Suzhou and Penang fabs have leading-edge advanced flip-chip packaging and testing
technology. The main products are used in high-end applications such as computers, servers,
high-end game consoles, and cloud computing centres. The transaction means that Tongfu has
obtained mass production technology and know-how about advanced packaging. Meanwhile,
the two fabs will continue to serve as the primary packaging and testing supplier for AMD and
transition to the OSAT business model.
According to company guidance, AMD allocates over 80% of its IC packaging and testing
orders to the Suzhou and Penang fabs. The two fabs now actively respond to AMD orders and
have developed 7nm wafer node technology, launched a number of new products, and acquired
many high-profile new customers. In 2017, the two fabs’ revenue grew by 24% y-o-y.
The two new fabs at Sutong and Hefei went into operation in September 2016 and utilization
rates are ramping up. At the Sutong fab, which is an additional production base for high-end
products, the number of clients has increased from 13 in early 2017 to 29, and the production
output has increase from a daily average of 200,000 units in early 2017 to 1.2m units.
The Hefei fab is focused on supporting the local IC industry. The number of clients has
increased from 11 in early 2017 to 33 and output has increased from a daily average of 3m
units in early 2017 to 11m units. Over 2017-19 the Heifei fab will build a world leading LCD
driver packaging and testing production line to support local panel makers, such as BOE. The
fab has also been selected as a supplier of Heifei Ruili, the strategic partner of GigaDevice, to
co-develop packaging and testing technology for high-end DRAM products.
In June 2017, Tongfu signed a strategic cooperation agreement with the Xiamen Haicang
government to build an advanced packaging and testing fab in Xiamen. Tongfu invested
RMB30m, giving it a 10% stake. At the time of break-even, Tongfu will acquire the remaining
stake from the government at the original invested price.
Top client AMD has positive momentum
AMD, the US multinational, is Tongfu’s largest client and accounted for 45% of the company’s
revenue in 2017. AMD wasn’t very competitive for several years but is regaining ground on its
two much larger competitors, Intel and Nvidia. Based on newly-developed Zen and Vega micro-
architecture, the company had great success in launching the Ryzen family of CPUs and
Radeon GPUs. The revenue of its computing and graphics segment surged 54% in 2017.
Enterprise, embedded, and semi-custom segment revenue grew 3%, driven by the new family
of high-performance EPYC processor platforms for the datacentre.
Looking ahead, AMD hopes to build on this momentum with the next wave of premium
products. In the PC market, the company expects more than 60 new Ryzen processor-based
OEM commercial and consumer systems to launch throughout 2018. In the graphics market, the
company aims to expand the Radeon “Vega”-architecture based line-up into high-end
notebooks, and start sampling the first 7nm node GPU for machine learning later in 2018.
In the datacentre segment, the company will continue to work closely with major cloud vendors
and OEMs to ramp their first-generation EPYC processor-based systems, while also completing
Exhibit 136. Six fabs and packaging platforms
Chongchuan Suzhou Penang Sutong Hefei Xiamen (10% ownership)
Bumping 8/12'' solder/copper FCBGAs FCBGAs BGAs, LGAs, FCCSP ICs (High Density) WLCSP WLCSP FCLGAs FCLGAs FCBGA, FCCSOP Memory Copper Pillar BGAs, LGAs, FCCSP FCPGAs FCPGAs QFN Test services Gold bumping QFNs, QFPs, ICs Coreless BGAs Coreless BGAs Test services Power Packaging Test services Bumping Test services Test services
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
75
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
development milestones on the next-generation “Zen 2” architecture-based server platforms.
AMD aims to achieve double-digit market share in the USD16bn datacentre market in the
coming years, up from 1% in 2017.
Exhibit 137. AMD is gaining market share Exhibit 138. AMD revenue trend
3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17
AMD PC CPU 9.1% 9.9% 11.4% 11.1% 10.9% 12.0%
GPU supplier 4Q17 2017 1Q18
AMD 27.2% 29.5% 33.7% Nvidia 72.8% 70.5% 66.3%
Source: Mercury Research, Jon Peddie Research Source: Company data, Bloomberg consensus estimates
MediaTek, Tongfu’s second largest client, accounted for about 10% of revenue in 2017. The
Taiwanese company has been losing market share to Qualcomm and Spreadtrum in the past
year due to a slowdown in product upgrades. The company is now back on a growth track and
revenue grew 21.8% y-o-y to USD2bn in 2Q18. This was driven by the adoption of its AI
capable mobile SoCs, such as Helio P60 chip, by a number of China-based smartphone
vendors, including Xiaomi, Oppo and Vivo.
MediaTek announced that it has joined China Mobile’s ‘5G Device Forerunner Initiative’
program to jointly develop 5G terminal devices and 5G chipsets. As one of the first chip makers
participating in the program, MediaTek announced its first 5G baseband chipset, Helio M70, will
be ready in 2019. In addition to its core smartphone business, MediaTek has been shifting more
of its business to chips for IoT, game consoles and ASICs, which account for about one third of
the company’s total revenue. The company has sold IoT chips to new customers such as
Amazon, Google and Chinese internet companies. Automotive electronics will be the next target
in terms of MediaTek’s long-term business growth.
Exhibit 139. MediaTek shipment trend Exhibit 140. MediaTek revenue trend
Source: Company data, HSBC estimates Source: Company data, Bloomberg consensus estimates
-40.0%
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e2019e2020e
Revenue Yoy
(USDm)
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Smartphone chip shipment Yoy
(m units)
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e2019e2020e
Revenue Yoy
(TWDm)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
76
Well positioned in the automotive IC market
According to IC Insights, the global automotive IC market in 2017 totalled USD27.2bn, accounting for
7.5% of the total IC market. IC Insights forecasts the automotive IC market to grow to USD43.6bn in
2021, which a 12.5% CAGR for 2017-21, the highest among the six major end-use applications.
Automotive IC’s are traditionally wire-bond packages. Due to the increasing complexity and
higher performance requirements of automotive applications, the packaging industry is moving
towards high performance advanced flip chip, fan-out and SiP packages for automotive
infotainment, GPS, and radar applications.
Tongfu is well positioned in the fastest growing automotive IC market. Among the top 10 automotive
IC vendors worldwide, seven of them are Tongfu’s existing clients. Moreover, the company has a
strategic cooperation agreement with Infineon to help enhance Tongfu’s manufacturing capabilities
and productivity by sharing Germen industry 4.0 experience and acknowledge.
According to the agreement, the cooperation between two parties will be carried out in stage.
Infineon will evaluate the current manufacturing capability of Tongfu in terms of equipment
productivity, production cycle, on-time delivery and quality, and propose a manufacturing
improvement plan. As part of the cooperation, Infineon also assisted Tongfu in setting up a 4.0
intelligent manufacturing demonstration production line at the Hefei fab in 2017.
Exhibit 141. 2017 Automotive IC vendor market share
Exhibit 142. IC market growth by end-use application (2017-2021e CAGR)
Ranking Company Market share
1 NXP 12.5% 2 Infineon 10.8% 3 Renesas 10.0% 4 Texas Instruments 8.0% 5 STMicro 7.1% 6 Bosch 5.5% 7 ON Semi 4.8% 8 Rohm Semi 2.7% 9 Toshiba 2.7% 10 ADI 2.6%
Source: Strategy Analytics Source: IC Insights
New revenue stream from cryptocurrency mining
Cryptocurrency mining, or cryptomining, is a process in which transactions for various forms of
cryptocurrency are verified and added to the blockchain digital ledger. Also known as cryptocoin
mining, altcoin mining, or Bitcoin mining (for the most popular form of cryptocurrency, Bitcoin),
cryptocurrency mining activity has increased rapidly in the last few years.
Cryptocurrency mining was originally designed to be something everyone could do with their
home computer. Those days are long gone. Today, whether you’re mining Bitcoin, Litecoin,
DASH, or a host of other cryptocurrencies, the most effective way to do so is with a piece of
hardware known as an ASIC miner. Application specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, are chips
that are designed with a singular purpose, ranging from audio processing to managing a
cellphone call. In the case of cryptocurrency mining, these chips are built into specifically-
designed motherboards and power supplies, constructed into a single unit.
Frost and Sullivan forecasts the ASIC-based hardware market will reach RMB28.6bn in 2020
from RMB2.6bn in 2016, implying an 82% CAGR. According to the prospectus of Canaan
4.6%
5.2%
5.4%
6.1%
6.8%
8.1%
12.5%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
Comm
Gov/Mil
Computer
Total Ics
Consumer
Industial
Automotive
77
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Creative, which produces blockchain servers and designs ASIC microprocessor solutions,
Chinese producers dominate the ASIC miner market. Bitmain takes nearly 70% market share,
followed by Canaan Creative 20%, Ebang 4%, and Pangolin 2%. About 1.5m mining units were
shipped in 2017, so we estimate that over 200m ASIC chips were shipped (assuming each
miner carries 150 ASIC chips on average). We expect Tongfu, as the main packaging and
testing supplier of Bitmain ASIC processor, to benefit from this new market.
Exhibit 143. Mainstream Bitcoin miners Exhibit 144. Blockchain hardware market size
Ant miner S9i Avalon miner A841
Producer Bitmain Canaan Creative Processor 189 units of BM1387
16nm ASIC chips 104 units of A3210
16nm ASIC chips Rated calculation power
13.5Hash/s 13Hash/s
Rated power 1320W/h 1290W/h Price RMB4500 RMB7600
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Frost & Sullivan
Introducing new clients to improve utilization
Tongfu’s margin has been dragged down by the low utilization rate of the two new fabs at
Sutong and Hefei. Introducing clients to a new fab usually takes 1.5-2 years as it takes time to
complete IC packaging platform verification. The fabs started operating in September 2016.
According to the company guidance, the two fabs lost nearly RMB100m on a net basis in 2017
but gross profit turned positive (RMB2-3m) in 1Q18. The company expects the two fabs to break
even by the end of 2018, which should drive margin improvement.
Another positive is that AMD orders now account for about 80% of the capacity of the Suzhou
and Penang fabs. Given the strong demand from AMD and the introduction of new clients in the
coming quarters, the company guided an RMB2.4bn capex in 2018 to increase capacity.
Broadcom and IDT’s products are mass produced at the Penang fab, and ZTE’s new product
has started mass production at Suzhou. Samsung has completed the verification process, while
Socionext, UMC and Higon have entered the verification stage. Pango ( ), Loongson
( ), and Brigates ( ) have entered the sample trial production stage.
Forecasts and valuation
Earnings forecast
We forecast a 44% net profit CAGR during 2018-20e, driven by an 18% revenue CAGR, margin
expansion through vertical integration, as well as operating leverage.
We expect the Suzhou and Penang fabs to have a 20% revenue CAGR during 2018-20e thanks
to strong demand from AMD and the introduction of new clients. We also expect the other three
fabs – Chongchuan, Sutong and Hefei – to have revenue CAGRs of 15%, 27% and 27% in this
period, driven by rising demand from automotive electronics and cryptocurrency mining, as well
as new clients.
2.6 7.3
14.6
24.0 28.6
0.8
1.4
2.9
5.6
6.9
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Non-ASIC based blockchain hareware
ASIC-based blockchain hareware
(RMBbn)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
78
We expect the gross margin to improve from 14.5% in 2017 to 19.0% in 2020e, driven by
capacity utilization improvement in the new fabs. We expect the SG&A to revenue ratio to
decline over time thanks to efficiency enhancements.
Exhibit 145. Revenue and gross profit forecast
RMBm 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e CAGR 18-20e
Chongchuan 2,825 3,265 3,852 4,430 5,095 15% Suzhou and Penang 1,740 2,955 3,546 4,256 5,107 20% Sutong 2 147 400 520 650 27% Hefei 25 153 400 520 650 27% Total 4,592 6,519 8,199 9,726 11,501 18% Gross profit 826 943 1,394 1,751 2,185 Gross profit margin 18.0% 14.5% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0%
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Sensitivity analysis
We think the two AMD fabs’ revenue growth and Chongchuan fab revenue growth are the two
critical swing factors for earnings. Our earnings sensitivity analysis for 2018e suggests that for
every 5% difference in the AMD fabs’ revenue growth, earnings would change by 1.0%; for
every 5% difference in Chongchuan fab revenue growth, earnings would change by 2.3%.
Exhibit 146. Sensitivity analysis for 2018e earnings (RMBm)
___________________ AMD fabs’ revenue growth ____________________
Chongchuan fab revenue growth
10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 8% 285 288 291 294 297
13% 293 296 299 302 305 18% 300 303 306 309 312 23% 308 311 314 317 320 28% 315 318 321 324 327
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Balance sheet and cash flow
Tongfu had net debt of RMB997m as at 2017, with a healthy net gearing level of 16.8%. It has
consistently generated positive operating cash flow, but free cash flow has been negative since
2014 due to the capex on new fabs.
The company guided for RMB2.4bn capex in 2018 for capacity expansion. Hence, we expect the
company’s free cash flow to stay negative and the net gearing ratio to increase in 2018. Beyond
that, with an improving margin and ROE, we expect the company’s free cash flow to turn positive
and net gearing ratio to decrease gradually. As the company is still in an expansion cycle with
more capital committed to new fabs, we expect the company to pay a dividend after 2019.
79
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 147. Balance sheet statement
RMBm 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Cash and equivalents 765 561 1,438 1,603 1,704 1,692 2,335 3,516 Net receivables 356 422 522 1,291 1,626 2,045 2,426 2,868 Inventory/stocks 250 274 318 782 975 1,190 1,395 1,629 Other current assets 29 72 661 266 132 132 132 132 Total Current assets 1,400 1,329 2,939 3,942 4,437 5,059 6,288 8,146 Net PP&E/Fixed assets 1,874 2,318 2,715 5,027 5,665 6,913 7,211 7,038 Net intangibles 72 95 125 285 267 307 314 322 Total investments 32 28 39 38 69 69 69 69 Other long-term assets 309 185 695 1,911 1,708 1,488 1,282 1,056 Total non-current asset 2,287 2,626 3,573 7,262 7,709 8,778 8,877 8,485 Total assets 3,686 3,955 6,512 11,203 12,146 13,838 15,165 16,632 Accounts payable 527 568 562 1,788 1,748 2,133 2,500 2,920 Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
513 591 983 1,468 1,928 1,928 1,928 1,928
Other current liabilities 16 17 15 59 53 53 53 53 Current liabilities 1,057 1,175 1,560 3,316 3,730 4,115 4,482 4,902 Long-term debt 120 152 476 301 772 1,772 2,272 2,772 Other long-term liabilities/creditors
253 263 736 1,445 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387
Total long-term liabilities 373 416 1,212 1,746 2,158 3,158 3,658 4,158 Total liabilities 1,430 1,591 2,772 5,061 5,888 7,273 8,140 9,060 Common stock 650 650 748 973 1,154 1,154 1,154 1,154 Treasury stock Reserve 1,606 1,714 2,992 2,925 4,765 5,072 5,533 6,079 Other common equity 0 0 1 20 0 - - - Total common equity 2,256 2,364 3,740 3,918 5,919 6,225 6,686 7,232 Minority interest - - - 2,223 339 339 339 339 Total equity 2,256 2,364 3,740 6,142 6,258 6,564 7,025 7,571 Total liabilities and equity 3,686 3,955 6,512 11,203 12,146 13,838 15,165 16,632
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
80
Exhibit 148. Cash flow statement
RMBm 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Net income 61 121 147 181 122 306 461 638 Minority interest and impairment add-back
11 16 14 100 69 39 54 70
Depreciation and amortization add-back
251 292 355 655 893 1,181 1,237 1,212
Investment Loss 3 3 (14) 1 (2) - - - (Increase)/decrease in working capital :
(66) (52) (312) (156) (212) (249) (219) (257)
Other operating cash flow items
50 36 41 4 140 140 140 140
Cash flow from operations
309 415 231 785 1,010 1,418 1,673 1,803
Capital expenditure (119) (664) (1,251) (1,561) (1,657) (2,400) (1,500) (1,000) (Acquisitions)/divestitures 2 0 1 0 33 - - - Investments 15 1 4 6 (30) - - - Other investment cash flow items
(37) 5 (679) (1,909) 4 - - -
Cash flow from investing (139) (657) (1,925) (3,464) (1,650) (2,400) (1,500) (1,000) Dividends paid (52) (47) (68) (89) (92) - - (92) Share repurchase/issue - - 1,253 1,809 - - - - Increase/(decrease) in debt
(62) 110 968 147 912 1,000 500 500
Other financing cash flow items
(6) (10) 312 1,011 (30) (30) (30) (30)
Cash flow from financing (120) 53 2,464 2,878 790 970 470 378 Effect of foreign exchange rate changes
(13) 1 15 (4) (37) - - -
Total cash flow 38 (189) 786 194 113 (11) 643 1,181 Free cash flow 190 (249) (1,020) (777) (647) (982) 173 803
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Valuation
We apply a 12m forward PE to value Tongfu. As earnings were cyclical up to 2015 the
company’s shares have historically traded in a quite wide multiple range, with a mid-cycle
forward PE of 60x and one-standard deviation of 33x. But since the acquisition of AMD’s
packaging and testing fabs in 2016, we believe Tongfu’s revenue and earnings growth profile
and has structurally changed and become less volatile and more predictable.
We forecast a 44% net profit CAGR over 2018-20e, which is slightly higher than the A-share
semiconductor sector average earnings CAGR of 37%. Therefore, we apply the A-share
semiconductor peer group’s valuation matrix to value the stock. We apply 35x forward PE to
Tongfu, in line with A-share sector average multiple. Accordingly, we derive a target price of
RMB12.05, implying 20% upside.
81
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 149. Comparable A-share semiconductor value chain
Ticker Company Currency Price Market cap DAV _ PE (x) __ PS (x) PB (x) EPS CAGR EV/EBITDA ROE (%) Div yield (%) USDm USDm 18e 19e 18e 18e 18-20e 18e 18e 18e
A-share 002371 CH NAURA TECH CNY 53.26 3,576 99 101.9 64.3 7.2 6.8 53% 51.4 7.1 0.2 002008 CH HAN'S LASER CNY 42.77 6,677 99 21.4 16.4 3.2 5.2 30% 18.5 25.0 1.0 002156 CH TONGFU MICRO CNY 10.05 1,696 13 30.0 19.9 1.4 1.8 39% 10.6 6.2 0.9 603986 CH GIGADEVICE SEMI CNY 110.00 4,566 86 49.5 34.3 10.2 14.5 45% 46.1 30.9 0.3 600584 CH JCET CNY 15.11 3,539 31 32.9 19.9 0.9 2.3 51% 9.4 7.1 0.3 300316 CH ZHEJIANG JINGSHENG CNY 12.46 2,357 34 23.0 17.9 5.0 3.9 25% 19.6 16.6 1.2 002049 CH UNIGROUP GUOXIN CNY 43.04 3,849 133 66.7 54.4 10.6 6.9 22% 41.8 11.1 0.2 300613 CH SHANGHAI FULLHAN CNY 119.85 801 7 40.4 28.0 8.9 5.0 37% 25.9 12.3 0.2 002185 CH TIANSHUI HUATIAN CNY 5.06 1,584 15 18.0 14.4 1.3 1.8 24% 8.3 10.1 0.9 600703 CH SANAN OPTOELECTRONICS CNY 15.94 9,458 95 16.4 12.8 6.0 2.8 27% 10.4 17.5 2.2 600460 CH HANGZHOU SILAN CNY 11.35 2,179 59 61.8 47.2 4.4 5.0 28% 33.2 8.6 0.8 300672 CH GOKE MICRO CNY 51.04 840 16 76.5 38.8 11.5 0.0 54% - 7.1 0.0 300666 CH KONFOONG MATERIALS CNY 47.00 1,518 36 124.2 85.5 13.6 16.0 38% 80.7 13.0 0.0 300458 CH ALL WINNER TECH CNY 23.67 1,153 21 49.2 35.2 5.1 3.6 38% 32.0 7.1 0.0 603005 CH CHINA WAFER LEVEL CSP CNY 20.23 692 6 37.2 24.7 5.9 2.5 44% 14.7 6.6 0.0 300323 CH HC SEMITEK CNY 11.60 1,872 12 15.9 11.6 3.0 2.4 33% 11.9 16.6 0.5 47.8 32.8 6.1 5.0 37% 27.6 12.7 0.5 Share prices as at 3 Sep 2018 Source: Company data, Wind, Bloomberg
Downside risks
Market share loss with key customers: Tongfu has around 80-90% market share in AMD’s
packaging and testing business, so we see limited chance of this improving. Also, AMD has
divested its majority ownership in the Suzhou and Penang fabs. According to the acquisition
agreement, AMD guarantees that the two fabs will generate not less than USD20m profit in the
following three years, otherwise AMD will cover any shortfall. This guarantee will expire in 2019.
Although AMD still has 15% ownership, it will have more options in terms of packaging and
testing suppliers by then, leading to downside risk for sales.
Raw material and key component sourcing: Tongfu relies on external souring of raw
materials such as bonding wire, molding material and key components such as lead frame and
substrate. Any regulatory changes or natural disaster causing a supply shortage would lead to
downside risk to sales and margins. g
Longer-than-expected new customer order wins: The IC packaging and testing business
needs a long period of time for product verification. It takes about two years to introduce new
clients and even longer for automotive electronics clients due to high requirements for reliability.
Slower-than-expected progress in verification would be a downside risk for sales.
Exhibit 150. Historical 12m forward PE Exhibit 151. Historical 12m forward PB
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
2007
/8
2008
/2
2008
/8
2009
/2
2009
/8
2010
/2
2010
/8
2011
/2
2011
/8
2012
/2
2012
/8
2013
/2
2013
/8
2014
/2
2014
/8
2015
/2
2015
/8
2016
/2
2016
/8
2017
/2
2017
/8
2018
/2
+1 STD
Mean
-1 STD
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
2007
/8
2008
/2
2008
/8
2009
/2
2009
/8
2010
/2
2010
/8
2011
/2
2011
/8
2012
/2
2012
/8
2013
/2
2013
/8
2014
/2
2014
/8
2015
/2
2015
/8
2016
/2
2016
/8
2017
/2
2017
/8
2018
/2
+1 STD
Mean
-1 STD
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
82
Financial statements
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
Profit & loss summary (CNYm)
Revenue 6,519 8,199 9,726 11,501
EBITDA 1,119 1,591 1,870 2,077
Depreciation & amortisation -893 -1,181 -1,237 -1,212
Operating profit/EBIT 226 409 633 866
Net interest -198 -137 -173 -190
PBT 178 373 561 776
HSBC Qianhai PBT 178 373 561 776
Taxation 19 -37 -56 -78
Net profit 122 306 461 638
HSBC Qianhai net profit 122 306 461 638
Cash flow summary (CNYm)
Cash flow from operations 1,010 1,418 1,673 1,803
Capex -1,657 -2,400 -1,500 -1,000
Cash flow from investment -1,650 -2,400 -1,500 -1,000
Dividends 0 0 0 -92
Change in net debt 831 1,011 -143 -681
FCF equity -928 -1,232 -77 553
Balance sheet summary (CNYm)
Intangible fixed assets 267 307 314 322
Tangible fixed assets 7,373 8,401 8,493 8,094
Current assets 4,437 5,059 6,288 8,146
Cash & others 1,704 1,692 2,335 3,516
Total assets 12,146 13,838 15,165 16,632
Operating liabilities 3,188 3,573 3,940 4,360
Gross debt 2,700 3,700 4,200 4,700
Net debt 997 2,008 1,865 1,184
Shareholders' funds 5,919 6,225 6,686 7,232
Invested capital 7,186 8,503 8,821 8,686
Ratio, growth and per share analysis
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
Y-o-y % change
Revenue 42.0 25.8 18.6 18.3
EBITDA 32.2 42.2 17.6 11.1
Operating profit 18.2 81.0 54.7 36.7
PBT -27.1 109.7 50.4 38.3
HSBC Qianhai EPS -31.6 104.3 50.4 38.5
Ratios (%)
Revenue/IC (x) 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3
ROIC 4.1 5.0 6.9 9.3
ROE 2.5 5.0 7.1 9.2
ROA 3.6 3.5 4.6 5.5
EBITDA margin 17.2 19.4 19.2 18.1
Operating profit margin 3.5 5.0 6.5 7.5
EBITDA/net interest (x) 5.6 11.6 10.8 10.9
Net debt/equity 15.9 30.6 26.5 15.6
Net debt/EBITDA (x) 0.9 1.3 1.0 0.6
CF from operations/net debt 101.3 70.6 89.7 152.3
Per share data (CNY)
EPS Rep (diluted) 0.13 0.27 0.40 0.55
HSBC Qianhai EPS (diluted) 0.13 0.27 0.40 0.55
DPS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08
Book value 5.13 5.40 5.80 6.27
Valuation data
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
EV/sales 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.1
EV/EBITDA 11.2 8.5 7.2 6.1
EV/IC 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5
PE* 77.3 37.8 25.2 18.2
PB 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6
FCF yield (%) -8.1 -10.7 -0.7 4.8
Dividend yield (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8
* Based on HSBC Qianhai EPS (diluted)
Issuer information
Share price (CNY) 10.05 Free float 84%
Target price (CNY) 12.05 Sector It Services
Reuters (Equity) 002156.SZ Country China
Bloomberg (Equity) 002156 CH Analyst Frank He
Market cap (USDm) 1,700 Contact +86 755 8898 3136
ESG metrics
Environmental Indicators Governance Indicators
GHG Intensity (kg/USD) na No. of board members 9
Energy Intensity (kWh/USD) na Average board experience (years) 4.4
CO2 reduction policy Yes Female board members (%) 11.1
Social Indicators Board members Independence (%) 33.3
Employee costs as % of sales na
Employee turnover (%) na
Diversity policy Yes
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Price relative
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities Note: Priced at close of 03 Sep 2018
6.60
8.60
10.60
12.60
14.60
16.60
18.60
6.60
8.60
10.60
12.60
14.60
16.60
18.60
2016 2017 2018
TongFu Microelectronics Rel to CSI 300 Index
Financials & valuation: TongFu Microelectronics Buy
83
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Broadening product portfolio to drive growth
GigaDevice is a leading memory chip design company with strong exposure to microcontrollers
and non-volatile memory devices such as NOR flash and NAND flash. It is a top-five global
NOR flash supplier with 13% market share and is China’s largest NOR flash and NAND flash
supplier. The company was established in 2005 and has been involved with R&D in NOR flash
since 2007.
Over the past decade, GigaDevice’s NOR flash technology has advanced from 130nm to 45nm,
covering 1.8V, 2.5V and 3.0V. In addition, GigaDevice started to mass produce microcontroller
units (MCU) in 2013 and NAND flash in 2017. The company is also partnering with Hefei
Changxin to develop 12-inch 19nm DRAM. Key customers include Spreadtrum, RDA
Microelectronics, MediaTek, Samsung, and IC component distributors. In 2017, China’s
National IC Fund (the “Big Fund”) took an 11% stake in the company.
Apart from organic growth, GigaDevice is also looking for M&A opportunities. The company is in
the process of acquiring a 100% stake in Shanghai Silead, a leading fingerprint chip designer.
NOR flash and microcontrollers are the main products, accounting for 84% and 15% of total
revenue in 2017.
Thanks to market share gains in NOR flash and product portfolio expansion, GigaDevice
achieved a 27% revenue and 56% net profit CAGR during 2013-17. Its gross margin has also
been rising in the past few years thanks to higher NOR flash prices and better product mix.
GigaDevice (603986 CH)
Leading NOR flash and MCU supplier keeps gaining market share
NAND flash and DRAM are long-term growth drivers
Initiate with a Hold rating and a target price RMB107.19
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
84
Exhibit 152. Corporate development history
Year Events
2005 Established in Beijing, mainly focused on the R&D of SRAM
2006 Low power SRAM in production
2007 Shifting the R&D focus to NOR flash
2009 The first 130nm 3.0V SPI NOR flash in mass production
2010 512K~32Mb NOR Flash in mass production
2011 The first 90nm product 3.0V SPI NOR flash in production
Starts R&D of 32-bit ARM-based MCU
2012 Starts R&D in 65nm, with annual chip sales to 590m units
2013 Mass production of 65nm NOR flash; 810m units sales
ARM Cortex 32 bit MCU is released
2014 NOR flash products enters wearable and smart home industry
2016 Listed in Shanghai Stock Exchange
2017
Proposes acquiring ISSI, a leading SRAM and DRAM supplier, but fails
China National IC Fund purchases 11% share of GigaDevice
Starts mass production of 38nm NAND Flash
Partnership with Hebei municipal government to develop 19nm DRAM
Invests 1% stake in SMIC for HKD533m
2018
Proposes acquiring 100% stake in Shanghai Silead and intends to invest in 14nm
Inferencing AI chip and 30MHz ultrasound sensor
To form JV with Rambus and THG Ventures to develop RRAM
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Exhibit 153. Revenue growth trend Exhibit 154. Gross margin trend
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Gaining market share
We think GigaDevice is becoming more competitive and has the potential to become a tier-one
player in NOR flash in the coming five years.
GigaDevice’s NOR flash product covers 512Kb to 1Gb density and 130nm-45nm by geometry,
which is comparable to Macronix and Winbond. Its products are widely used in consumer
electronics, mobile phones, computing, IoT auto and industrial sectors. It has a large market
share in feature phones, WiFi routers, PC mainboards, notebooks, set-top boxes, USB keys,
smart TVs, surveillance cameras, graphic cards, and GPS navigation.
787 931
1,062 1,292
1,716 1
15
127
197
311
-
300
600
900
1,200
1,500
1,800
2,100
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Memory Microcontroller Others
(RMBm)
27% CAGR
21.9%24.9%
27.3%24.2%
37.6%40.0% 39.4%
43.1%
47.9%
21.9%
25.2%
28.7%26.7%
39.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Memory Microcontroller Overall
85
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
The company also recently became a supplier of 32MB NOR flash for Samsung’s Galaxy S9
camera modules, together with Winbond. The memory is used for image processing purposes.
That said, GigaDevice already a leading player in the low-density product category.
Its growth strategy is to continue to gain market share in the low-density segment (<128Mb)
while enhancing its know-how in high-density products. As Macronix and Winbond have both
expressed their intention to focus on high-density products, we expect GigaDevice will continue
to gain traction in the low-density category. In the high-density category, GigaDevice indicates
that 128MB and 256MB above products accounted for around 20% of sales in 2017.
In terms of node technology, two-thirds of its revenue was generated from 65nm in 2015, with
most of the balance coming from 90mn. In 2018, the company has assigned SMIC to produce
45nm products on a small scale and we expect sales to make a revenue contribution in 2019.
Although GigaDevice only accounted for low teens’ market share of the NOR flash market in
terms of revenue in 2017, its market share in total volume shipments is about 30%, down from
43% in 2015. This suggests its average selling price is lower than the industry average. But this
pricing discount has narrowed from 74% in 2015 to 57% in 2017, implying that GigaDevice is
moving up the value chain and gaining traction in high-density, high-quality product categories.
Exhibit 155. NOR flash volume shipment share
Exhibit 156. NOR flash ASP comparison
Source: WSTS, Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: WSTS, Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
We believe the fabless model provides flexibility in terms of production capacity and technology
advantages, and also enables the company to focus on IC design. As a shareholder of SMIC,
we believe GigaDevice receives strong support from SMIC in terms of capacity allocation and
technical know-how. Also, GigaDevice is able to leverage SMIC’s expertise and R&D in
advanced wafer fabrication to compete with global peers. SMIC produces 28nm IC and is in the
process of migrating to14nm. As at the end of 2017, 61% of its employees worked in the R&D
department; the company has filed 781 patents and been granted 261.
The company also has access to a low cost of equity financing to support new product R&D and
M&A. GigaDevice is trading at premium valuation to overseas peers, which means it is able to
raise capital at lower cost, which we think helps explain its proposal to acquire Shanghai Silead
and its previous unsuccessful effort to acquire ISSI in 2017.
3,959 4,253
3,461
4,923
5,710
810 1,108
1,478 1,686 1,736
20%
26%
43%
34%
30%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Global NOR Flash volume GigaDevice volume
GigaDevice market share
(m)
0.97 0.84
0.72 0.77 0.99
3.62
2.90 2.80
2.31 2.30
-73%-71%
-74%-67%
-57%
-80%
-70%
-60%
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
-
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
GigaDevice Global average Discount
(RMB)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
86
Exhibit 157. Gross margin comparison Exhibit 158. R&D as % of total revenue comparison
Source: Company data Source: Company data
MCU
Microcontroller (MCU) is a small computer on a single IC. It consists of processors (CPU),
memory and input/output peripherals (display, RF, switches, sensors) that can be used as an
embedded system. Most MCU in use today are embedded in equipment, and widely used in
automobiles, industrials, consumer electronics, and IoT. This is in contrast to microprocessors
(MPU) that are used in PCs or other applications that consist of various discrete chips.
GigaDevice started its R&D of MCU in 2011 and in 2013 launched the first 32-bit general-
purpose ARM Cortex M3 MCU, which was mainly applied in entry-level industrial and consumer
IoT markets. Industrial applications include long-range data collection, safety controls, and
environmental monitoring, while consumer applications cover smart appliances, smart meters,
and home gateways. It then launched the 32-bit ARM Cortex-M4 series MCU in 2016, targeting
fingerprint technology, wireless charging, high-performance computing, and graphic design. 32-
bit is now the prevailing standard for high-performance MCUs, accounting for roughly 40% of
the total MCU market, with the balance from 8- and 16-bit. In terms of technology node, it is in
the process of reviewing a possible migration from 55nm to 40nm.
Leveraging on its expertise in memory, a critical part of MCU, we think GigaDevice can extend
its product portfolio by entering the MCU market. MCU is a much larger market than NOR flash.
According to IC Insights, the global MCU market’s revenue was USD17.9bn in 2017, which is
almost 9x higher than that for NOR flash.
IC Insights forecasts that the MCU market, fuelled by applications in autos, IoT and industrial
controls, will reach USD20.9bn in 2020, implying a CAGR of 6.3%. The MCU market is
dominated by overseas suppliers such as NXP, Renesas and Microchip. GigaDevice’s market
share in MCU is below 3%, so we see ample room for growth.
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Cypress Micrcon Macronix Winbond GigaDevice
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Cypress Micrcon Macronix Winbond GigaDevice
87
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 159. MCU market share breakdown in 2016
Exhibit 160. Global MCU market size forecast
Source: IC Insights, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: IC Insights, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Revenue from the MCU business has increased from RMB15m in 2014 to RMB311m in 2017, a
CAGR of 175%. In addition, due to more customization and less direct competition, the MCU
margin is higher than in its flash memory unit. GigaDevice currently has over 300 MCU products
with cumulative unit sales exceeding 200m as at May 2018, serving over 10,000 customers.
Exhibit 161. A typical wearable MCU architecture
Exhibit 162. GigaDevice MCU margin and ASP
Source: ARM Source: Company data
NAND Flash
Apart from NOR Flash, GigaDevice is ramping up NAND flash sales with a focus on the low-
density, SLC (single level cell) 2D product segment. Its applications include embedded systems
in feature phones, low-end smartphones, data cards, set-top boxes, and smart TVs. Its initial
strategy behind entering the NAND market is to complement high-density NOR flash in high-end
feature phones as the bit cost for NAND is more competitive in the 512Mb and above Flash
memory category.
The market for NAND Flash amounts to USD47bn in 2017, which is much larger than for NOR
Flash and MCU. However, due to high technical entry barriers the market is quite consolidated
with the top five vendors (Samsung, Toshiba, Western Digital, Micron and SK Hynix) accounting
for 93% market share in 2017.
NXP19%
Renesas16%
Microchip13%
Samsung12%
STMicroelectronics10%
Infineon7%
Texas Instrument
5%
Cypress4%
Others14%
-
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Market size (USD) (LHS) Units (LHS) ASP (RHS)
(bn) (USD)
Apps.
CPU
Always ON
CPUGPU
Display
Processor
Video
Processor
Interconnect
RadioFlash
MemoryROM SRAM
4.40 4.30 4.21
39.4%
43.1%47.9%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
2015 2016 2017
ASP Gross margin
(RMB)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
88
Exhibit 163. NAND Flash market size Exhibit 164. NAND Flash market share in
2017
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: DramExchange
Global NAND bit demand has increased from 43bn GB in 2013 to 183bn GB in 2017, a CAGR
of 62%. Rapid growth is likely to continue. Micron forecasts that NAND flash bit demand will rise
at a 40-45% CAGR over 2017-21, driven by the proliferation of cloud data centres, high
definition video, data storage, the growing transition from hard disk drive (HDD) to solid state
drive (SSD) in PCs and servers, as well as growing storage density for mobile devices.
GigaDevice is able to provide SPI (Series Peripheral Interface) 1G-8G NAND with 1.8/3.0V
voltage, and is in the process of extending this to 32GB. In terms of node technology, the
company started mass producing 38nm NAND Flash in 3Q17, and is in the process of
improving 24nm yield (over 40% yield in 3Q17). We estimate revenue from NAND flash will
reach RMB50m in 2018, accounting for 2% of its total revenue.
However, we still see a big technology gap between GigaDevice and leading NAND flash
suppliers. Their advanced 2D NAND node is generally at the 1xnm level, vs the 2x/3xnm offered
by GigaDevice. They are also able to produce advanced 3D NAND. 3D NAND uses a stacked
architecture, which means memory cells are layered vertically, in contrast to 2D NAND, which
has a single layer. 3D NAND can pack more capacity into less physical space at lower cost than
2D NAND. 3D NAND normally uses MLC (multi-level cell) and TLC (triple-level cell) as it stores
2 and 3 bits per cell compared to SLC. It is essentially a solution to solve the bottlenecks in
node shrinking under Moore’s Law.
SLC is now a niche market as it accounts for less than 5% of the total NAND market, with TLC
capturing over 50% share, with the balance going to MLC. We think GigaDevice’s major competitors
in SLC NAND include Taiwanese peers such as Macronix, Winbond, and Powerchip.
11.514.5
12.314.8
21.724.4 25.4
27.5 28.2 28.8
32.0
47.2
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
NAND market size Yoy
(USDbn)
Samsung, 36%
Toshiba, 17%
Western Digital, 17%
Micron, 12%
SK Hynix, 10%
Intel, 6%Others, 1%
89
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 165. NAND Flash bit demand growth
Exhibit 166. SLC, MLC and TLC NAND comparison
SLC MLC TLC
Bits per cell 1 2 3
Writing speed Fastest <SLC <MLC
Service life Longest Average < 1/2 of MLC
Program/erase cycle times
50-100K 3-10K 0.5-1K
Source: Micron Source: Speedguide.net
Proposed acquisition of Shanghai Silead – eyeing AI and IoT opportunities
GigaDevice wants to acquire a 100% stake in Shanghai Silead (unlisted) for RMB1,700m
(RMB255m in cash and new share issuance of RMB1,445m). The placement price is fixed at
RMB63.97/share, implying a total of 22.59m shares to be issued (8% of total outstanding
shares). The transaction is now under review and subject to approval by the regulator, the
CSRC.
Silead is a leading Chinese IC design company that specializes in fingerprint and touch panel IC
industry. It was ranked third in the fingerprint IC market in terms of shipments in 2017, with a
6.5% market share. It is also a top-five touch panel IC supplier worldwide with 9.5% market
share. Around 50% of its revenue is generated from O-film Tech (002456 CH, CNY 17.24, Buy).
In 2017, revenue totalled RMB448m, up 155% y-o-y, with 80% of revenue from fingerprint IC
and 20% from touch panel IC. Thanks to the strong revenue growth, net profit also turned from
a loss of RMB2.8m in 2016 to positive RMB11.4m in 2017.
GigaDevice expects the acquisition will help the company to broaden its product portfolio to
fingerprint and touch sensors. According to Sunrise Big Data, the fingerprint penetration rate in
smartphones has increased from 26% in 2015 to 61% and is expected to reach 88% in 2020. In
addition, we see an evolution in fingerprint technology from a traditional capacitive solution to
optical (in-display) and ultrasound (under glass) which will continue to drive the adoption of
fingerprint applications in the coming years.
More importantly, GigaDevice intends to leverage on Silead’s expertise in biometric sensors and
R&D platform in the areas of AI and IoT IC. In addition to the transaction cost, GigaDevice also
plans to raise RMB1,075m via a private placement, mainly to invest in R&D. The focus will be
on: 1) 14nm embedded AI Inferencing IC, to integrate voice, facial and biometric recognition
technology; 2) the 30MHz ultrasonic MEMS sensor, which is targeting in-display fingerprint
applications in smartphone and tablets; and 3) a human-machine interaction project. Given
GigaDevice’s know-how in memory and MCU, we think it can become a total solution provider in
SoC systems for AI and IoT.
In addition, Silead has also guaranteed its aggregate net profit in 2018-20 to be no less than
RMB320m. If it fails to achieve the target, the seller will proportionally return part of the shares
received, based on the difference between actual and guaranteed profit.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2013 2017 2021
Enterprise & Cloud SSD Client SSD
Mobile Consumer / removable
43
183
703~809(Bn Gb)
40-45% CAGR
62% CAGR
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
90
Exhibit 168. Revenue breakdown of Shanghai Silead
Exhibit 169. Fingerprint industry market penetration
Source: Company data Source: Company data, Sunrise Big Data
Exhibit 170. 2017 fingerprint IC shipment market share
Exhibit 171. 2017 capacitive touch IC shipment share
Source: CCID, Company data Source: CCID, Company data
DRAM the long-term driver: the Hefei project is making progress
In October 2017, GigaDevice signed an agreement with Hefei Industrial Investment Group, a wholly
owned subsidiary of Hefei SASAC, to jointly develop a 19nm, 12-inch DRAM project. The total
investment amounts to RMB18bn. GigaDevice and the Hefei government are responsible for 20%
and 80% of the total, respectively, through either direct or indirect equity or debt financing.
The project aims to achieve more than 10% yield by end-2018. If the target is achieved
GigaDevice has an obligation to acquire all the interests of Hefei Industrial Investment Group
within five years. If the yield target is not realized, Hefei Industrial Investment Group has the
right to ask GigaDevice to acquire its outstanding interest before the end of 2019. So far
GigaDevice has not directly invested in the DRAM project, preferring financing through both
debt and equity.
Hefei Changxin is the primary entity for the DRAM project which started in 2016. So far
GigaDevice does not have ownership of the project. The designed phase 1 monthly capacity
amounts to 125,000 pieces. The company has recruited talent from leading memory companies
in Taiwan, Korea, and Japan. Phase 1 plant construction was completed in in 1Q18 and the
company has started equipment installation. There were over 1,500 employees as at April 2018,
with approximately one third from Taiwan.
34
358
63
140
87
14
1
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2016 2017 1Q18
Fingerprint IC Touch IC Others
25%
43%
61%
73%
82%88%
26%
61%
70%
78%
85%91%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019e 2020e
Global China
Goodix35%
FPC35%
Silead7%
Synaptics4%
Egis Tec4%
Microarray3%
Others12%
Egis Tec15%
Mstar14%
Goodix13%
Silead10%
Synaptics9%
Betterlife8%
Chipone7%
Cypress5%
Others19%
91
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Hefei Changxin has accumulated an impressive array of proprietary IPs over the past two years. By
the end of 2017, the company had filed 354 patents and plans to apply for a further 1,155 in 2018.
The technology covers the supply chain, including development tools, design, masks, fabrication,
and testing.
We believe it will take time to improve the yield from 10% to 60%, the level required for mass
production. Once the 60% target is achieved, GigaDevice expects it will take another 8-12 months to
reach an 80%-plus yield. GigaDevice now expects to mass produce 8GB LPDDR4 in 3Q19.
On 17 July 2018, GigaDevice announced that its founder, Mr Zhu Yiming, had resigned as
general manager but would remain as chairman and a board member. Deputy general
manager, Mr He Wei, has taken over as general manager. At the same time, Mr Zhu was
appointed as the CEO of Changxin Storage and Hefei Ruili Integrated Circuits, which are the
two major subsidiaries under Hefei Changxin (see exhibit 173), according to report by
technews.tw. More importantly, Hefei Changxin completed the design process for 8Gb LPDDR4
DRAM on 17 July. This suggests a critical milestone has been reached, creating an incentive for
GigaDevice to ramp up its DRAM development.
Exhibit 172. Key milestones of the Hefei Changxin DRAM project
Source: Company data
Exhibit 173. Ownership structure of Hebei DRAM project
Exhibit 174. DRAM market size
Source: Company data, Tianyancha.com Source: DramExchange, HSBC Qianhai Securities
The size of the DRAM market increased 76% y-o-y to USD72.8bn in 2017, driven by a 46%
y-o-y rise in selling price and 21% y-o-y bit growth. Propelled by growing demand from
applications in data centers such as AI, autonomous driving, and increasing memory per device
in smartphones and PCs, Micron forecasts that DRAM demand will increase from 92bn GB in
2017 to 190bn GB in 2021, a 20% CAGR over 2017-21.
China relies heavily on DRAM imports as we estimate it consumes more than a third of global DRAM
supply. In addition, DRAM supply is very concentrated with Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron
May 2016
Kicks off
DRAM project
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Mar 2017
Starts Phase 1
plant
construction
Jan 2018
Complete phase 1
plant construction
End 2018
Sampling 8Gb
DDR4
Jan 2018
Start equipment
installation
3Q19
To mass produce
8Gb LPDDR4
End 2019
To reach
20,000
pieces/month
2020
Start phase 2
plant construction
2021
To complete
R&D of 17nm
project
Hefei SASAC
Hefei Industrial
Investment Group
Hefei Industrial
Investment New
Strategic Partners
Hefei Changxin
Changxin Storage
Ruili Integrated Circuit
Hefei Ruijie
Jucheng
100%
99.75% 0.25%
19.9% 80.1%
100%
GigaDevice1:4
33.8 31.3
24.0 22.4
39.2
29.4 26.1
34.8
46.9 45.0
41.2
72.8
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
-
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
DRAM market size Yoy
(USDbn)
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
92
accounting for 95%. Given the rising DRAM price, high import value, and growing demand, we
believe achieving DRAM self-supply is becoming a policy priority of the Chinese government.
Unigroup Guoxin Microelectronics is the first Chinese company able to produce DRAM, but its
products focus is on the DDR3 category. Fujian Jinhua, partners with UMC, focuses on 25 and
30nm node DRAM development. It completed plant construction and equipment installation in
July 2018 and plans to mass produce in September 2018. That said, we think GigaDevice has
the chance to be the technology leader among Chinese DRAM suppliers in 2019-20.
Exhibit 175. Market share of DRAM in 2017 Exhibit 176. DRAM bit demand forecast
Source: DramExchange Source: Micron, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Forecasts and valuation
Earnings forecasts
We forecast that GigaDevice will record a 37% net profit CAGR over 2017-20e, driven by 39%
revenue CAGR and stable margin. We believe NOR flash will continue to be an earnings driver
and expect the company to improve its market share from 13% in 2017 to 23% in 2020e,
especially in the mid- to low-density product category.
We expect NOR flash to account for over 82% of its total revenue by 2020e, similar to the 84%
in 2017. In addition, we expect NAND flash and MCU will achieve rapid revenue growth due to a
low base and fast customer adoption. On the margin side, we expect gross margin to decline
slightly due to potential pricing moderation on new capacity roll-out in China and competition
with global peers. We do not factor in any revenue and earnings contribution from the Hefei
DRAM project in our base case.
Samsung46%
SK Hynix28%
Micron21%
Nanya2%
Winbond1%
Powerchip1%
Others1%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2013 2017 2021
PC/Consumer Server Mobile Specialty
36
(bn Gb)
92
190
26% CAGR
20% CAGR
93
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 178. Revenue and gross profit forecasts
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e 2017-20e
Revenue (RMBm) CAGR
Memory 782 829 1,062 1,292 1,716 2,350 3,478 4,744 40% NOR Flash 782 829 1,062 1,292 1,706 2,250 3,278 4,444 38% NAND Flash - - - - 10 100 200 300 211% MCU 1 15 127 197 311 451 586 703 31% Others 6 103 - - 3 2 3 3 0% Total 789 947 1,189 1,489 2,030 2,804 4,067 5,451 39% y-o-y
20% 26% 25% 36% 38% 45% 34%
Gross profit
Memory 172 232 290 313 645 870 1,252 1,708 38% MCU 1 6 50 85 149 203 264 317 29% Others - - - - 1 1 1 1 4% Total 173 239 341 398 795 1,073 1,517 2,026 37% Gross profit margin Memory 21.9% 24.9% 27.3% 24.2% 37.6% 37.0% 36.0% 36.0% MCU n/a 40.0% 39.4% 43.1% 47.9% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% Total 21.9% 25.2% 28.7% 26.7% 39.2% 38.3% 37.3% 37.2%
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Sensitivity analysis
We think global NOR flash shipment growth and GigaDevice’s NOR flash market share are the
two critical swing factors for earnings. Our earnings sensitivity analysis for 2018e suggests that
for every 5% difference in shipment growth, earnings would change by 3.8%; for every 2%
difference in market share, earnings would change by 10.3%.
Exhibit 179. Sensitivity analysis for 2018e earnings (RMBm)
________________ Global NOR flash shipment growth ________________ 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
GigaDevice NOR flash market share
13% 453 470 486 503 519 15% 504 523 542 561 580 17% 555 576 598 619 641 19% 605 629 653 678 702 21% 656 683 709 736 762
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Balance sheet and cash flow
GigaDevice had net cash of RMB359m as at end-2017. The company has consistently
generated positive operating cash flows since 2013 and positive free cash flow (except 2017),
thanks to its asset-light fabless model. As the company is in the process of acquiring Shanghai
Silead mainly via private placement, we think its balance sheet will remain solid in 2018-19.
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
94
Exhibit 180. Balance sheet statement
RMBm 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Cash and equivalents 199 262 420 872 587 551 796 1,228 Net receivables 57 116 136 129 173 230 334 448 Inventory/stocks 143 184 220 407 627 1,152 1,671 2,240 Other current assets 24 12 23 28 43 43 43 43 Total Current assets 423 574 798 1,435 1,431 1,977 2,845 3,959 Net PP&E/Fixed assets 37 35 47 76 102 216 320 411 Net intangibles 0 0 - 5 5 6 6 6 Total investments - 15 24 110 804 804 804 804 Other long-term assets 15 13 30 44 233 209 165 124 Total non-current asset 52 63 101 235 1,144 1,234 1,295 1,345 Total assets 475 636 900 1,670 2,574 3,211 4,139 5,304 Accounts payable 106 171 233 294 496 664 978 1,314 Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
- - - - 45 45 45 45
Other current liabilities 1 9 13 23 13 13 13 13 Current liabilities 108 180 246 316 554 722 1,036 1,372 Long-term debt - - - - 184 184 184 184 Other long-term liabilities/creditors
35 36 83 74 80 142 184 240
Total long-term liabilities 35 36 83 74 264 326 367 424 Total liabilities 143 216 329 391 817 1,048 1,404 1,796 Common stock 75 75 75 100 203 203 203 203 Treasury stock - - - - (121) (121) (121) (121) Reserve 256 345 496 1,179 1,675 2,081 2,653 3,426 Other common equity - - - - - - - - Total common equity 331 420 571 1,279 1,756 2,163 2,735 3,508 Minority interest - 0 (1) 1 1 1 1 1 Total equity 331 420 571 1,279 1,757 2,164 2,736 3,508 Total liabilities and equity 475 636 900 1,670 2,574 3,211 4,139 5,304
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
95
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Exhibit 181. Cash flow statement
RMBm 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Net income 67 98 158 176 397 542 763 1,030 Minority interest and impairment add-back
4 7 12 13 57 30 30 30
Depreciation and amortization add-back
15 17 20 25 31 36 46 59
Investment Loss (2) (5) (0) (1) (54) - - - (Increase)/decrease in working capital :
13 (22) 34 (130) (258) (414) (309) (347)
Other operating cash flow items
3 (0) (7) 1 25 - - -
Cash flow from operations
100 95 217 84 198 194 530 772
Capital expenditure (29) (18) (41) (79) (233) (150) (150) (150) (Acquisitions)/divestitures - - 0 - - - - - Investments (3) (6) (7) (83) (549) - - - Other investment cash flow items
- - 1 - - - - -
Cash flow from investing (32) (23) (47) (161) (782) (150) (150) (150) Dividends paid - (10) (15) - (53) (80) (135) (191) Share repurchase/issue - - - 535 121 - - - Increase/(decrease) in debt
- - - - 235 - - -
Other financing cash flow items
- - - (15) 9 - - -
Cash flow from financing - (10) (15) 521 313 (80) (135) (191) Effect of foreign exchange rate changes
(5) 1 3 9 (13) - - -
Total cash flow 64 63 158 452 (285) (36) 245 431 Free cash flow 71 77 176 5 (35) 44 380 622
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities estimates
Valuation
We apply 12m forward PE to value GigaDevice, with reference to its historical valuation and
earnings growth trend. We project the company will register 37% net profit CAGR in 2017-20e,
which is slightly lower than historical CAGR of 44% during 2012-17. We believe it is reasonable
to apply a historical average forward PE of 45.3x to value the stock. Accordingly, our target
price for GigaDevice is RMB107.19, implying 3% downside. We rate the stock as a Hold.
Upside risks
Design wins in high-density, high-quality NOR Flash. GigaDevice’s current NOR flash products
focus on the low-density category. If the company can win orders in the high-density segment for
auto and industrial, it could boost the revenue and margin outlook from our base case.
Higher-than-expected SLC NAND Flash revenue growth. SLC NAND Flash is a new
business for GigaDevice, so it has a limited track record for this product. However, given the low
base and its strategic partnership with SMIC, we do not exclude the possibility that GigaDevice
could become a more competitive supplier in the 2D NAND market in the coming years.
Downside risks
NOR flash pricing and margin trend. Demand and supply dynamics will affect the NOR flash
pricing outlook. Individual company capacity expansion/contraction, new applications and
competition from other memory products will cause price volatility. Our base case assumes a
flattish NOR flash price trend in 2018-20. Our sensitivity analysis indicates that a 1% change in
the NOR flash price would potentially result in a 0.6% change in 2018e net profit.
DRAM project development is slower than expected. There are various technical issues to be
solved before commercial production can begin. If the company’s Hefei Changxin DRAM project fails
to reach the development target on time as discussed above, GigaDevice is obliged to acquire all of
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
96
Hefei Industrial Group’s interest in the DRAM development and may incur a significant loss on the
project.
Exhibit 182. Historical 12m forward PE Exhibit 183. Historical 12m forward PB
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
2016
/8
2016
/9
2016
/10
2016
/11
2016
/12
2017
/1
2017
/220
17/3
2017
/4
2017
/5
2017
/6
2017
/7
2017
/8
2017
/9
2017
/10
2017
/11
2017
/12
2018
/1
2018
/220
18/3
2018
/4
2018
/5
2018
/6
2018
/7
+1 STD
-1 STD
Mean
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
2016
/8
2016
/9
2016
/10
2016
/11
2016
/12
2017
/1
2017
/220
17/3
2017
/4
2017
/5
2017
/6
2017
/7
2017
/8
2017
/9
2017
/10
2017
/11
2017
/12
2018
/1
2018
/220
18/3
2018
/4
2018
/5
2018
/6
2018
/7
+1 STD
-1 STD
Mean
97
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Financial statements
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
Profit & loss summary (CNYm)
Revenue 2,030 2,804 4,067 5,451
EBITDA 434 641 905 1,224
Depreciation & amortisation -31 -36 -46 -59
Operating profit/EBIT 403 605 859 1,165
Net interest -27 3 3 4
PBT 449 623 877 1,184
HSBC Qianhai PBT 449 623 877 1,184
Taxation -52 -81 -114 -154
Net profit 397 542 763 1,030
HSBC Qianhai net profit 397 542 763 1,030
Cash flow summary (CNYm)
Cash flow from operations 198 194 530 772
Capex -233 -150 -150 -150
Cash flow from investment -782 -150 -150 -150
Dividends -80 -135 -191 -258
Change in net debt 513 36 -245 -431
FCF equity -136 -1 335 577
Balance sheet summary (CNYm)
Intangible fixed assets 5 6 6 6
Tangible fixed assets 334 425 485 535
Current assets 1,431 1,977 2,845 3,959
Cash & others 587 551 796 1,228
Total assets 2,574 3,211 4,139 5,304
Operating liabilities 589 820 1,175 1,568
Gross debt 228 228 228 228
Net debt -359 -323 -568 -999
Shareholders' funds 1,756 2,163 2,735 3,508
Invested capital 594 1,036 1,364 1,705
Ratio, growth and per share analysis
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
Y-o-y % change
Revenue 36.3 38.1 45.1 34.0
EBITDA 169.1 47.6 41.2 35.3
Operating profit 194.9 50.0 42.0 35.6
PBT 141.8 38.7 40.8 35.0
HSBC Qianhai EPS -6.6 -2.6 39.4 35.0
Ratios (%)
Revenue/IC (x) 4.6 3.4 3.4 3.6
ROIC 80.1 64.6 62.3 66.1
ROE 26.2 27.6 31.1 33.0
ROA 19.9 18.6 20.7 21.7
EBITDA margin 21.4 22.9 22.2 22.5
Operating profit margin 19.9 21.6 21.1 21.4
EBITDA/net interest (x) 15.9
Net debt/equity -20.4 -14.9 -20.8 -28.5
Net debt/EBITDA (x) -0.8 -0.5 -0.6 -0.8
CF from operations/net debt
Per share data (CNY)
EPS Rep (diluted) 1.98 1.93 2.69 3.63
HSBC Qianhai EPS (diluted) 1.98 1.93 2.69 3.63
DPS 0.39 0.67 0.94 1.27
Book value 8.67 10.67 13.49 17.31
Valuation data
Year to 12/2017a 12/2018e 12/2019e 12/2020e
EV/sales 14.8 10.7 7.3 5.4
EV/EBITDA 69.2 46.9 33.0 24.0
EV/IC 50.6 29.0 21.9 17.2
PE* 55.6 57.1 40.9 30.3
PB 12.7 10.3 8.2 6.4
FCF yield (%) -0.4 0.0 1.1 1.9
Dividend yield (%) 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.2
* Based on HSBC Qianhai EPS (diluted)
Issuer information
Share price (CNY) 110.00 Free float 73%
Target price (CNY) 107.19 Sector It Services
Reuters (Equity) 603986.SS Country China
Bloomberg (Equity) 603986 CH Analyst Frank He
Market cap (USDm) 4,574 Contact +86 755 8898 3136
ESG metrics
Environmental Indicators Governance Indicators
GHG Intensity (kg/USD) na No. of board members 9
Energy Intensity (kWh/USD) na Average board experience (years) 2.2
CO2 reduction policy Yes Female board members (%) 11.1
Social Indicators Board members Independence (%) 33.3
Employee costs as % of sales na
Employee turnover (%) na
Diversity policy Yes
Source: Company data, HSBC Qianhai Securities
Price relative
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities Note: Priced at close of 03 Sep 2018
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
160.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
160.00
2016 2017 2018
Gigadevice Semiconductor Rel to CSI 300 Index
Financials & valuation: Gigadevice Semiconductor Hold
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
98
Disclosure appendix
Analyst Certification
The following analyst(s), economist(s), or strategist(s) who is(are) primarily responsible for this report, including any analyst(s)
whose name(s) appear(s) as author of an individual section or sections of the report and any analyst(s) named as the covering
analyst(s) of a subsidiary company in a sum-of-the-parts valuation certifies(y) that the opinion(s) on the subject security(ies) or
issuer(s), any views or forecasts expressed in the section(s) of which such individual(s) is(are) named as author(s), and any other
views or forecasts expressed herein, including any views expressed on the back page of the research report, accurately reflect
their personal view(s) and that no part of their compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific
recommendation(s) or views contained in this research report: Frank He
Important disclosures
Equities: Stock ratings and basis for financial analysis
HSBC and its affiliates, including the issuer of this report (“HSBC”) believes an investor's decision to buy or sell a stock should
depend on individual circumstances such as the investor's existing holdings, risk tolerance and other considerations and that
investors utilise various disciplines and investment horizons when making investment decisions. Ratings should not be used or
relied on in isolation as investment advice. Different securities firms use a variety of ratings terms as well as different rating
systems to describe their recommendations and therefore investors should carefully read the definitions of the ratings used in
each research report. Further, investors should carefully read the entire research report and not infer its contents from the rating
because research reports contain more complete information concerning the analysts' views and the basis for the rating.
From 23rd March 2015 HSBC has assigned ratings on the following basis:
The target price is based on the analyst’s assessment of the stock’s actual current value, although we expect it to take six to 12
months for the market price to reflect this. When the target price is more than 20% above the current share price, the stock will
be classified as a Buy; when it is between 5% and 20% above the current share price, the stock may be classified as a Buy or a
Hold; when it is between 5% below and 5% above the current share price, the stock will be classified as a Hold; when it is between
5% and 20% below the current share price, the stock may be classified as a Hold or a Reduce; and when it is more than 20%
below the current share price, the stock will be classified as a Reduce.
Our ratings are re-calibrated against these bands at the time of any 'material change' (initiation or resumption of coverage, change
in target price or estimates).
Upside/Downside is the percentage difference between the target price and the share price.
Prior to this date, HSBC’s rating structure was applied on the following basis:
For each stock we set a required rate of return calculated from the cost of equity for that stock’s domestic or, as appropria te,
regional market established by our strategy team. The target price for a stock represented the value the analyst expected the
stock to reach over our performance horizon. The performance horizon was 12 months. For a stock to be classified as Overweight,
the potential return, which equals the percentage difference between the current share price and the target price, including the
forecast dividend yield when indicated, had to exceed the required return by at least 5 percentage points over the succeeding 12
months (or 10 percentage points for a stock classified as Volatile*). For a stock to be classified as Underweight, the stock was
expected to underperform its required return by at least 5 percentage points over the succeeding 12 months (or 10 percentage
points for a stock classified as Volatile*). Stocks between these bands were classified as Neutral.
*A stock was classified as volatile if its historical volatility had exceeded 40%, if the stock had been listed for less than 12 months
(unless it was in an industry or sector where volatility is low) or if the analyst expected significant volatility. However, stocks which
we did not consider volatile may in fact also have behaved in such a way. Historical volatility was defined as the past month's
average of the daily 365-day moving average volatilities. In order to avoid misleadingly frequent changes in rating, however,
volatility had to move 2.5 percentage points past the 40% benchmark in either direction for a stock's status to change.
99
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Rating distribution for long-term investment opportunities
As of 06 September 2018, the distribution of all independent ratings published by HSBC is as follows:
For the purposes of the distribution above the following mapping structure is used during the transition from the previous to current
rating models: under our previous model, Overweight = Buy, Neutral = Hold and Underweight = Sell; under our current model Buy
= Buy, Hold = Hold and Reduce = Sell. For rating definitions under both models, please see “Stock ratings and basis for financial
analysis” above.
For the distribution of non-independent ratings published by HSBC, please see the disclosure page available at
http://www.hsbcnet.com/gbm/financial-regulation/investment-recommendations-disclosures.
To view a list of all the independent fundamental ratings disseminated by HSBC during the preceding 12-month period, please
use the following links to access the disclosure page:
Clients of Global Research and Global Banking and Markets: www.research.hsbc.com/A/Disclosures
Clients of HSBC Private Banking: www.research.privatebank.hsbc.com/Disclosures
HSBC & Analyst disclosures
Disclosure checklist
Company Ticker Recent price Price date Disclosure
HANS LASER TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY 002008.SZ 41.95 05 Sep 2018 6, 7
Source: HSBC Qianhai Securities
1 HSBC has managed or co-managed a public offering of securities for this company within the past 12 months.
2 HSBC expects to receive or intends to seek compensation for investment banking services from this company in the next 3
months.
3 At the time of publication of this report, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. is a Market Maker in securities issued by this
company.
4 As of 31 July 2018, HSBC beneficially owned 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of this company.
5 As of 31 July 2018, this company was a client of HSBC or had during the preceding 12 month period been a client of
and/or paid compensation to HSBC in respect of investment banking services.
6 As of 31 July 2018, this company was a client of HSBC or had during the preceding 12 month period been a client of
and/or paid compensation to HSBC in respect of non-investment banking securities-related services.
7 As of 31 July 2018, this company was a client of HSBC or had during the preceding 12 month period been a client of
and/or paid compensation to HSBC in respect of non-securities services.
8 A covering analyst/s has received compensation from this company in the past 12 months.
9 A covering analyst/s or a member of his/her household has a financial interest in the securities of this company, as
detailed below.
10 A covering analyst/s or a member of his/her household is an officer, director or supervisory board member of this
company, as detailed below.
11 At the time of publication of this report, HSBC is a non-US Market Maker in securities issued by this company and/or in
securities in respect of this company
12 As of 30 Aug 2018, HSBC beneficially held a net long position of more than 0.5% of this company’s total issued share
capital, calculated according to the SSR methodology.
13 As of 30 Aug 2018, HSBC beneficially held a net short position of more than 0.5% of this company’s total issued share
capital, calculated according to the SSR methodology. HSBC and its affiliates will from time to time sell to and buy from customers the securities/instruments, both equity and debt
(including derivatives) of companies covered in HSBC Research on a principal or agency basis.
Buy 53% ( 26% of these provided with Investment Banking Services )
Hold 37% ( 25% of these provided with Investment Banking Services )
Sell 10% ( 13% of these provided with Investment Banking Services )
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
100
Analysts, economists, and strategists are paid in part by reference to the profitability of HSBC which includes investment banking,
sales & trading, and principal trading revenues.
Whether, or in what time frame, an update of this analysis will be published is not determined in advance.
Non-U.S. analysts may not be associated persons of HSBC Securities (USA) Inc, and therefore may not be subject to FINRA
Rule 2241 or FINRA Rule 2242 restrictions on communications with the subject company, public appearances and trading
securities held by the analysts.
Economic sanctions imposed by the EU and OFAC prohibit transacting or dealing in new debt or equity of Russian SSI entities.
This report does not constitute advice in relation to any securities issued by Russian SSI entities on or after July 16 2014 and as
such, this report should not be construed as an inducement to transact in any sanctioned securities.
For disclosures in respect of any company mentioned in this report, please see the most recently published report on that company
available at www.hsbcnet.com/research. HSBC Private Banking clients should contact their Relationship Manager for queries
regarding other research reports. In order to find out more about the proprietary models used to produce this report, please contact
the authoring analyst.
Additional disclosures
1 This report is dated as at 07 September 2018.
2 All market data included in this report are dated as at close 03 September 2018, unless a different date and/or a specific
time of day is indicated in the report.
3 HSBC has procedures in place to identify and manage any potential conflicts of interest that arise in connection with its
Research business. HSBC's analysts and its other staff who are involved in the preparation and dissemination of
Research operate and have a management reporting line independent of HSBC's Investment Banking business.
Information Barrier procedures are in place between the Investment Banking, Principal Trading, and Research businesses
to ensure that any confidential and/or price sensitive information is handled in an appropriate manner.
4 You are not permitted to use, for reference, any data in this document for the purpose of (i) determining the interest
payable, or other sums due, under loan agreements or under other financial contracts or instruments, (ii) determining the
price at which a financial instrument may be bought or sold or traded or redeemed, or the value of a financial instrument,
and/or (iii) measuring the performance of a financial instrument.
5 This report may be a translation of a report authored in another language. If so, and if there is any discrepancy between
versions, the original-language version shall prevail.
6 At the time of publication of this report, HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited does not hold 1% or more of a class of common
equity securities of this company.
Production & distribution disclosures
1. This report was produced and signed off by the author on 06 Sep 2018 05:15 GMT.
2. In order to see when this report was first disseminated please see the disclosure page available at
https://research.hsbcqh.com.cn/R/34/xPdKkKc
101
EQUITIES ● SEMICONDUCTORS & EQUIPMENT
September 2018
Disclaimer
*Legal entities as at 30 November 2017
‘UAE’ HSBC Bank Middle East Limited, Dubai; ‘HK’ The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Hong Kong;
‘TW’ HSBC Securities (Taiwan) Corporation Limited; 'CA' HSBC Securities (Canada) Inc.; HSBC Bank, Paris Branch; HSBC
France; ‘DE’ HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt AG, Düsseldorf; 000 HSBC Bank (RR), Moscow; ‘IN’ HSBC Securities and Capital
Markets (India) Private Limited, Mumbai; ‘JP’ HSBC Securities (Japan) Limited, Tokyo; ‘EG’ HSBC Securities Egypt SAE,
Cairo; ‘CN’ HSBC Investment Bank Asia Limited, Beijing Representative Office; The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited, Singapore Branch; The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Seoul Securities
Branch; The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Seoul Branch; HSBC Securities (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd,
Johannesburg; HSBC Bank plc, London, Madrid, Milan, Stockholm, Tel Aviv; ‘US’ HSBC Securities (USA) Inc, New York;
HSBC Yatirim Menkul Degerler AS, Istanbul; HSBC México, SA, Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero HSBC;
HSBC Bank Australia Limited; HSBC Bank Argentina SA; HSBC Saudi Arabia Limited; The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited, New Zealand Branch incorporated in Hong Kong SAR; The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited, Bangkok Branch; PT Bank HSBC Indonesia; HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited
Issuer of report
HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited
Block 27 A&B, Qianhai Enterprise Dream Park, 63
Qianwan Yi Road, Shenzhen-Hong Kong Cooperation
Zone, Shenzhen, China
Phone number: +86 755 8898 3288
Website: www.hsbcqh.com.cn
In the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) (Excluding special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macao), this document is issued and approved by HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited for the information of
its clients only; it is not intended for and should not be distributed to retail customers in the PRC. HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited is regulated by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”) and is
qualified to engage in Securities Investment Advisory Business in the PRC [91440300MA5EPLHG1B]. All inquiries by recipients must be directed to the HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited contact in the PRC. If it
is received by a customer of an affiliate of HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited, its provision to the recipient is subject to the terms of business in place between the recipient and such affiliate. This document is being
supplied to you solely for your information and may not be redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person, in whole or in part, for any purpose. This document is not and should not be
construed as an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment. HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited has based this document on information obtained from sources it believes to
be reliable but which it has not independently verified; HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited makes no guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or completeness.
The decision and responsibility on whether or not to purchase, subscribe or sell (as applicable) must be taken by the investor. No consideration has been given to the particular investment objectives, financial
situation or particular needs of any recipient. Any form of written or verbal commitment on the sharing of gains or losses from the securities investment between the investors and the HSBC Qianhai Securities
Limited arising from the research services provided are not permitted and shall be invalid. Expressions of opinion are those of the Research Division of HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited only and are subject to
change without notice. From time to time research analysts conduct site visits of covered issuers. HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited and its affiliates and/or their officers, directors and employees may have
positions in any securities mentioned in this document (or in any related investment) and may from time to time add to or dispose of any such securities (or investment) to the extent permitted by law. HSBC
Qianhai Securities Limited and its affiliates may act as market maker or have assumed an underwriting commitment in the securities of companies discussed in this document (or in related investments), may sell
them to or buy them from customers on a principal basis and may also perform or seek to perform investment banking or underwriting services for or relating to those companies and may also be represented on
the supervisory board or any other committee of those companies. This document may contain hyperlinks to external websites for convenience of its recipients. HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited are not responsible
for any content therein. HSBC policies prohibit research analysts from accepting payment or reimbursement for travel expenses from the issuer for such visits.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited owns 51% and Qianhai Financial Holdings Co., Ltd. (“QFH”) owns 49% of shares in HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited, which prepared and/or contributed
to this research report. HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited has established policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent QFH from exercising direct or indirect influence over the content of HSBC
Qianhai Securities Limited research reports and the choice of companies that will be the subject of research reports. Furthermore, HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited has established additional policies and
procedures reasonably designed to prevent any person or entity, whether from within HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited, QFH or otherwise, from influencing the activities of the HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited’s
research analysts or the content of research reports.
The information and opinions in this research report were distributed by The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited in Hong Kong, which accepts legal responsibility for its contents. This research
report is intended to provide information to The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited's institutional and professional investor (as defined in Schedule 1 to the Securities and Future Ordinance
(Cap. 571)) ("SFO") customers only; it is not intended for and should not be distributed to customers in Hong Kong who are not "professional investors". The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
is regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited makes no representations that the products or services mentioned in this document are available
to persons in Hong Kong. Any enquiries with respect to any matters arising from, or in connection with, this research report should be directed to the recipient’s contact person at The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation Limited. The analyst(s) named in this research report who is(are) not employed by and/or accredited to The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited is(are) not licensed to
carry on any regulated activities in Hong Kong under the SFO. The analyst(s) is(are) only named in this research report as being a source of the information contained herein and does(do) not purport to carry on
any regulated activities in Hong Kong under the SFO or hold himself/herself(themselves) out as being able to do so.
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., a US-registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA, accepts responsibility for the content of this research report prepared by its non-US foreign affiliate. All U.S. persons receiving
and/or accessing this report and wishing to effect transactions in any security discussed herein should do so with HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. in the United States and not with its non-US foreign affiliate, the issuer
of this report. In the UK this report may only be distributed to persons of a kind described in Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005. The protections afforded
by the UK regulatory regime are available only to those dealing with a representative of HSBC Bank plc in the UK. In Singapore, this publication is distributed by The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Limited, Singapore Branch for the general information of institutional investors or other persons specified in Sections 274 and 304 of the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289) (“SFA”) and accredited investors
and other persons in accordance with the conditions specified in Sections 275 and 305 of the SFA. This publication is not a prospectus as defined in the SFA. It may not be further distributed in whole or in part
for any purpose. The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Singapore Branch is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Recipients in Singapore should contact a "Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Singapore Branch" representative in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with this report. In Australia, this publication has been distributed by The Hongkong
and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (ABN 65 117 925 970, AFSL 301737) for the general information of its “wholesale” customers (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001). Where distributed to retail
customers, this research is distributed by HSBC Bank Australia Limited (ABN 48 006 434 162, AFSL No. 232595). These respective entities make no representations that the products or services mentioned in
this document are available to persons in Australia or are necessarily suitable for any particular person or appropriate in accordance with local law. No consideration has been given to the particular investment
objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any recipient. This publication is distributed in New Zealand by The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, New Zealand Branch incorporated
in Hong Kong SAR.
In Japan, this publication has been distributed by HSBC Securities (Japan) Limited. It may not be further distributed in whole or in part for any purpose. In Korea, this publication is distributed by The Hongkong
and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Seoul Securities Branch ("HBAP SLS") for the general information of professional investors specified in Article 9 of the Financial Investment Services and Capital
Markets Act (“FSCMA”). This publication is not a prospectus as defined in the FSCMA. It may not be further distributed in whole or in part for any purpose. HBAP SLS is regulated by the Financial Services
Commission and the Financial Supervisory Service of Korea.
In Canada, this document has been distributed by HSBC Securities (Canada) Inc. (member IIROC), and/or its affiliates. The information contained herein is under no circumstances to be construed as investment
advice in any province or territory of Canada and is not tailored to the needs of the recipient. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority in Canada has reviewed or in any way passed judgment upon
these materials, the information contained herein or the merits of the securities described herein, and any representation to the contrary is an offense.
If you are an HSBC Private Banking (“PB”) customer with approval for receipt of relevant research publications by an applicable HSBC legal entity, you are eligible to receive this publication. To be eligible to
receive such publications, you must have agreed to the applicable HSBC entity’s terms and conditions (“KRC Terms”) for access to the KRC, and the terms and conditions of any other internet banking service
offered by that HSBC entity through which you will access research publications using the KRC. Distribution of this publication is the sole responsibility of the HSBC entity with whom you have agreed the KRC
Terms.
If you do not meet the aforementioned eligibility requirements please disregard this publication and, if you are a customer of PB, please notify your Relationship Manager. Receipt of research publications is strictly
subject to the KRC Terms, which can be found at https://research.privatebank.hsbc.com/ – we draw your attention also to the provisions contained in the Important Notes section therein.
© Copyright 2018, HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited. MCI (P) 016/02/2018 and MCI (P) 116/01/2018
[1101716]
Head of Research, HSBC Qianhai Securities Steven Sun +86 755 8898 3158 [email protected]
China Equity Strategy
Analyst, Head of China Equity Strategy Research Steven Sun +86 755 8898 3158 [email protected]
Associate Kate Zhang
Consumer
Analyst, Head of A-share Food & Beverage and Pulp & Paper Research Katharine Song +86 755 8898 3142 [email protected]
Associate Joseph Zhou
Healthcare
Analyst, Head of Greater China Healthcare Research Zhijie Zhao +86 755 8898 3144 [email protected]
Associate Jialei Fan
Industrials and Environmental Services
Analyst, Head of A-share Industrials and Environmental Research Bonan Li +86 755 8898 3139 [email protected]
Telecoms, Media & Technology
Analyst, Head of A-share Technology Hardware Research Frank He +86 755 8898 3136 [email protected]
Analyst, Head of A-share Media & Internet Research Yi Guo +86 755 8898 3137 [email protected]
Analyst, A-share Media & Internet Jing Han +86 755 8898 3147 [email protected]
Analyst, A-share IT Software Jamie Ma +86 755 8898 3140 [email protected]
Associate Kevin Xing
HSBC Qianhai Research Team
Frank He* (S1700517120005)Analyst, Head of A-share Technology Hardware Research HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited +86 755 8898 3136 | [email protected]
Frank He joined HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited in 2017 as Head of A-share Technology Hardware Research, covering the semiconductor, handset supply chain, telecom equipment and auto electronics sectors. From 2010 to 2017, he served as an analyst at two leading global brokerages, responsible for research on the clean energy, infrastructure and conglomerate sectors. In 2007-10, Frank was a lead technology and Internet research analyst at a Chinese securities firm in Hong Kong. He holds a BSc in actuarial science from the University of Hong Kong.
*Employed by a non-US affiliate of HSBC Securities (USA) Inc, and is not registered/qualified pursuant to FINRA regulations.
Main contributor
Issuer of report:HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited
Block 27 A&B, Qianhai Enterprise Dream Park63 Qianwan Yi Road, Shenzhen-Hong Kong Cooperation Zone
Shenzhen, ChinaTelephone: +86 755 8898 3288
Website: https://research.hsbcqh.com.cn
东西智库,专注知识分享