chop, dice, slice, mince, or julienne: the multiple ways of measuring faculty workload at the...

41
Chop, Dice, Slice, Chop, Dice, Slice, Mince, or Julienne: Mince, or Julienne: The Multiple Ways of The Multiple Ways of Measuring Faculty Workload Measuring Faculty Workload at the Departmental Level at the Departmental Level Samford University

Upload: norman-hoover

Post on 31-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Chop, Dice, Slice, Chop, Dice, Slice, Mince, or Julienne: Mince, or Julienne:

The Multiple Ways of The Multiple Ways of Measuring Faculty Workload Measuring Faculty Workload

at the Departmental Levelat the Departmental Level

Samford University

BackgroundBackground

Population OverviewPopulation Overview Masters IMasters I 4,400 students4,400 students 9 Colleges9 Colleges 270 full-time faculty270 full-time faculty 140 part-time faculty140 part-time faculty Don’t have Graduate AssistantsDon’t have Graduate Assistants 100 degree programs100 degree programs Analysis focused on 18 departments in the Analysis focused on 18 departments in the

College of Arts and SciencesCollege of Arts and Sciences

The age old struggle…..how The age old struggle…..how many faculty is enough?many faculty is enough?

Accrediting Accrediting standards is a startstandards is a start

Started with one Started with one department department requesting a new requesting a new faculty linefaculty line

Led to a systematic Led to a systematic means of tracking means of tracking departmental departmental growth and needs growth and needs for budget for budget purposespurposes

Evaluating the Department Evaluating the Department not the Individual Faculty not the Individual Faculty

MemberMember Meyer (1998) defined faculty workload Meyer (1998) defined faculty workload

as “time spent on professionally as “time spent on professionally appropriate activities.”appropriate activities.”

Workload is just one of the aspects of Workload is just one of the aspects of faculty productivity. faculty productivity.

This analysis served to examine This analysis served to examine departmental workload as opposed to departmental workload as opposed to individual productivity.individual productivity.

Not an analysis of quality.Not an analysis of quality.

Reaching ConsensusReaching Consensus Departments want to show they need a Departments want to show they need a

new faculty member, while Provost new faculty member, while Provost wants to be a good steward of the wants to be a good steward of the operational fundsoperational funds

How will it be and not be used? - Not How will it be and not be used? - Not used to evaluate individual faculty as a used to evaluate individual faculty as a part of their annual reviewpart of their annual review

We took departmental concerns and We took departmental concerns and utilized suggestions -Incorporating utilized suggestions -Incorporating trouble facultytrouble faculty

One Size Does Not Fit One Size Does Not Fit AllAll

Differing missions, curriculums, costDiffering missions, curriculums, cost Some Departments teach a lot of Some Departments teach a lot of

core courses to students outside core courses to students outside their majortheir major

Use of Part-time vs. Full-time Use of Part-time vs. Full-time Some departments have a course that is the Some departments have a course that is the

specialty of an adjunctspecialty of an adjunct

Productivity vs. CostProductivity vs. Cost

NEEDNEEDSS

Conducting Conducting Your AnalysisYour Analysis

Data Elements - StudentData Elements - Student

Student relatedStudent related Course enrollmentCourse enrollment School – Department – MajorSchool – Department – Major LevelLevel

Data Elements – Course Data Elements – Course

Course relatedCourse related CollegeCollege DepartmentDepartment Meeting day/time/place Meeting day/time/place Course levelCourse level Credit hoursCredit hours Excluded coursesExcluded courses

Data ElementsData Elements

The only way to determine cross listed courses in our system is to examine meeting date, time, and location.

Data Elements - CourseData Elements - Course

Course relatedCourse related CollegeCollege DepartmentDepartment Meeting day/time/place Meeting day/time/place Course levelCourse level Credit hoursCredit hours Excluded coursesExcluded courses

Data Elements - FacultyData Elements - Faculty

Faculty relatedFaculty related College and departmentCollege and department Full-time/Part-time statusFull-time/Part-time status Visiting facultyVisiting faculty RankRank NameName Courses taughtCourses taught

Percent responsibility for each coursePercent responsibility for each course

Data Elements – Data Elements – University of Delaware’s University of Delaware’s

Cost StudyCost Studyhttp://www.udel.edu/IR/cost/index.http://www.udel.edu/IR/cost/index.htmlhtml

CarnegiCarnegie Classe Class

#Responde#Respondentsnts

Direct Direct InstructioInstructional nal ExpendituExpenditures per res per Student Student Credit Credit HourHour

Direct Direct InstructioInstructional nal ExpendituExpenditures per res per Student Student FTEFTE

Personnel Personnel Cost as % Cost as % of Direct of Direct InstructioInstructional nal ExpendituExpendituresres

Classics Classics and and ClassicaClassical l LanguaLanguagesges

MastersMasters 1616 $174$174 $5,300$5,300 9595

DoctoralDoctoral 55 $162$162 $5,009$5,009 9292

SamfordSamford $193$193 $5,661$5,661 7272An invaluable tool!!!!

Categories to Frame the Categories to Frame the AnalysisAnalysis

Defined student levels as:Defined student levels as: Lower Undergraduate (FR and SO)Lower Undergraduate (FR and SO) Upper Undergraduate (JR and SR)Upper Undergraduate (JR and SR) GraduateGraduate BACHE BACHE

Defined student’s major as:Defined student’s major as: In or out of the College of Arts and SciencesIn or out of the College of Arts and Sciences In or out of the department offering the In or out of the department offering the

coursecourse Summed for each courseSummed for each course

Data Element Data Element ConsiderationsConsiderations

Data based on Department’s Faculty or Data based on Department’s Faculty or Department’s Courses….that is the Department’s Courses….that is the question!question! What it means?What it means? Who it benefits?Who it benefits?

Both methods have special considerations:Both methods have special considerations: Courses by faculty’s home department?Courses by faculty’s home department?

Faculty who belong to more than one departmentFaculty who belong to more than one department Courses by the department offering the course?Courses by the department offering the course?

How to split load of courses that are cross How to split load of courses that are cross referenced by two department prefixes (i.e. POLS314 referenced by two department prefixes (i.e. POLS314 is also HIST356)is also HIST356)

Data Element Data Element ConsiderationsConsiderations

Pull data for entire academic year or Pull data for entire academic year or pull data for fall terms only?pull data for fall terms only?

How many years of data is How many years of data is necessary?necessary?

Consider that some faculty who have taught Consider that some faculty who have taught in the past may have since left the in the past may have since left the universityuniversity

Full-time/part-time status of faculty change Full-time/part-time status of faculty change over timeover time

Incorporate individuals with institutional Incorporate individuals with institutional memories – INCREASES Buy-in!.memories – INCREASES Buy-in!.

Data Element Data Element ConsiderationsConsiderations

University Core Curriculum coursesUniversity Core Curriculum courses Cultural PerspectivesCultural Perspectives Communication Arts I and IICommunication Arts I and II Biblical PerspectivesBiblical Perspectives Concepts of Fitness and HealthConcepts of Fitness and Health

What effect do they have on the What effect do they have on the analysis?analysis?

Belong to Belong to the the DepartmeDepartment of nt of General General University University (GENL)(GENL)

Chop, Dice, Slice, Chop, Dice, Slice, Mince, or Julienne?Mince, or Julienne?

School level, Department level, Faculty School level, Department level, Faculty levellevel

All coursesAll courses University Core Curriculum courses onlyUniversity Core Curriculum courses only All courses All courses exceptexcept Core Core Student LevelStudent Level Majors vs. Non-majorsMajors vs. Non-majors Full-time vs. Part-timeFull-time vs. Part-time Courses, credit hours, headcountsCourses, credit hours, headcounts

FindingsFindings

Department Majors as % of Department Majors as % of Total UndergraduatesTotal Undergraduates

Classics Department Enrollment as % of Total Undergraduate Enrollment

0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.4%0.0% 0.0%

0.4%

1.0% 1.0%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Classics as % of Total Classics as % of A&S

DepartmenDepartmental growth tal growth as as measured measured by Majorsby Majors

Reliance on Part-time Reliance on Part-time Faculty as Measured by Faculty as Measured by

Courses TaughtCourses TaughtNumber of Courses Taught by FT and PT

Classics Department Faculty

0

5

10

15

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Fall Term

Num

ber o

f Cou

rses

FT Faculty

PT Faculty

When does When does the use of the use of part-time part-time faculty faculty indicate a indicate a need for a need for a new full-new full-time line?time line?

Reliance on Part-time Reliance on Part-time Faculty as Measured by Faculty as Measured by

Students TaughtStudents TaughtNumber of Students Taught by FT and PT

Classics Department Faculty

0

50

100

150

200

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Fall Term

Num

ber o

f Stu

dent

s

FT Faculty

PT Faculty

When does When does the over-the over-use of use of part-time part-time faculty faculty indicate a indicate a need for a need for a new full-new full-time line?time line?

Reliance on Part-time Reliance on Part-time Faculty as Measured by Faculty as Measured by

Credit HoursCredit HoursNumber of Student Credit Hours Taught by FT and PT

Classics Department Faculty

0100200300400500600700

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Fall Term

Stud

ent C

redi

t Hou

rs

FT Faculty

PT Faculty

When does When does the over-the over-use of use of part-time part-time faculty faculty indicate a indicate a need for a need for a new full-new full-time line?time line?

Core Students vs. Students Core Students vs. Students in Majorin Major

CORE Portion of Total Students Taught by Full-time Classics Dept Faculty

0

50

100

150

200

250

All Enrl

UCBP only

All Enrl 75 88 145 156 166

UCBP only 47 23 67 64 42

2000F 2001F 2002F 2003F 2004F

Analyzing Student MajorAnalyzing Student MajorNumber of Students Taught by Classics Dept. Faculty

Those Enrolled Within the Classics Dept Compared to Those Enrolled in Other Departments

(Fall Terms Only)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000 0 75 0 76

2001 0 88 0 112

2002 2 143 4 30

2003 11 145 7 31

2004 18 148 0 36

Classics Dept Non-Classics Dept Classics Dept Non-Classics Dept

FT Faculty FT Faculty PT Faculty PT Faculty

Analyzing Student Major – Analyzing Student Major – Excluding Core CoursesExcluding Core Courses

Number of Students Taught by Classics Dept. Faculty Those Enrolled Within the Classics Dept Compared to Those

Enrolled in Other Departments(Fall Terms Only - CORE Excluded)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000 0 75 0 29

2001 0 88 0 43

2002 2 76 4 30

2003 11 81 7 31

2004 18 106 0 36

CLAS Dept Students Non-CLAS Dept Students CLAS Dept Students Non-CLAS Dept Students

FT Faculty FT Faculty PT Faculty PT Faculty

Analyzing Student LevelAnalyzing Student LevelCompare the Enrollment of the Different Class Levels of

Students Taught by the Classics Dept Faculty (Fall Terms Only)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2000 26 27 22 67 9 0

2001 47 19 22 78 33 0

2002 99 36 10 22 12 0

2003 92 47 13 25 13 0

2004 78 84 0 26 10 0

Low er Undergrad LevelUpper Undergrad LevelGraduate Level Low er Undergrad LevelUpper Undergrad LevelGraduate Level

FT Faculty FT Faculty FT Faculty PT Faculty PT Faculty PT Faculty

Hours Taught by Faculty Hours Taught by Faculty Department or Course Department or Course

Department….that is the question?Department….that is the question?

AppendicesAppendices

Student Credit Hours (SCH) per Student Credit Hours (SCH) per Faculty for every department Faculty for every department

University of Delaware Instructional University of Delaware Instructional Cost dataCost data

Instructional cost definitionsInstructional cost definitions

Departmental ConcernsDepartmental Concerns

Questions from Department ChairsQuestions from Department Chairs How courses were listed How courses were listed

Notations they were not familiar withNotations they were not familiar with Courses (and sometimes faculty) were being Courses (and sometimes faculty) were being

dropped if the course did not have at least dropped if the course did not have at least TBA in the meeting day field – TBA in the meeting day field – Remember Remember that we rely on this for determining cross-that we rely on this for determining cross-referenced classes!referenced classes!

The Next Step -The Next Step -Using Your Using Your

ResultsResults

SACSSACS

Core requirement 2.5 – Institutional Core requirement 2.5 – Institutional Effectiveness through Planning and Effectiveness through Planning and EvaluationEvaluation

Core requirement 2.8 – Number of Core requirement 2.8 – Number of Faculty is AdequateFaculty is Adequate

Comprehensive standard 3.7.1 – Comprehensive standard 3.7.1 – Competent Faculty MembersCompetent Faculty Members

Comprehensive standard 3.7.2 – Comprehensive standard 3.7.2 – Evaluates Effectiveness of Faculty Evaluates Effectiveness of Faculty

Work AheadWork Ahead

Looking at data for academic yearLooking at data for academic year Pulling in all SchoolsPulling in all Schools BANNER, BANNER, BANNER - BANNER, BANNER, BANNER -

Translating the data……but fighting Translating the data……but fighting to get it firstto get it first

When your university wants to growWhen your university wants to grow

Out of Classroom Out of Classroom ActivitiesActivities

Expanding Departmental Expanding Departmental Productivity to include out of Productivity to include out of classroom activities. Using classroom activities. Using University of Delaware Out of University of Delaware Out of Classroom ProductivityClassroom Productivity

Demand/Yield/CostDemand/Yield/Cost

Demand/Yield/Cost Model – Based Demand/Yield/Cost Model – Based on Austen Group’s “Curriculum and on Austen Group’s “Curriculum and Cost Analysis” done for the Cost Analysis” done for the Association of Southern Baptist Association of Southern Baptist Colleges and SchoolsColleges and Schools

www.austengroup.comwww.austengroup.com

Demand/Yield/CostDemand/Yield/Cost

DEMANDEMANDD

COSTCOST

High Demand/High Cost Programs

Low Demand/ Low Cost Programs

Demand/Yield/CostDemand/Yield/CostWhich Way Should the Which Way Should the

Arrows Point?Arrows Point?

DEPARTMEDEPARTMENT SIZENT SIZE COSTCOST

DEMANDEMANDD

Demand/Yield/CostDemand/Yield/CostWhich Way Should the Which Way Should the

Arrows Point?Arrows Point?

DEPARTMEDEPARTMENT SIZENT SIZE COSTCOST

DEMANDEMANDD

Leave your card and we will Leave your card and we will send you this Powerpoint send you this Powerpoint

and a departmental sample.and a departmental sample.

QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?