christopher dougherty ec220 - introduction to econometrics (chapter 4) slideshow: the disturbance...
TRANSCRIPT
Christopher Dougherty
EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (chapter 4)Slideshow: the disturbance term in logarithmic models
Original citation:
Dougherty, C. (2012) EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (chapter 4). [Teaching Resource]
© 2012 The Author
This version available at: http://learningresources.lse.ac.uk/130/
Available in LSE Learning Resources Online: May 2012
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. This license allows the user to remix, tweak, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as the user credits the author and licenses their new creations under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
http://learningresources.lse.ac.uk/
1
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
Thus far, nothing has been said about the disturbance term in nonlinear regression models.
uX
Y 21
XZ
1
uZY 21
2
For the regression results in a linearized model to have the desired properties, the disturbance term in the transformed model should be additive and it should satisfy the regression model conditions.
uX
Y 21
XZ
1
uZY 21
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
3
To be able to perform the usual tests, it should be normally distributed in the transformed model.
uX
Y 21
XZ
1
uZY 21
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
4
In the case of the first example of a nonlinear model, there was no problem. If the disturbance term had the required properties in the original model, it would have them in the regression model. It has not been affected by the transformation.
uX
Y 21
XZ
1
uZY 21
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
vXeXY u 2211
uXY logloglog 21
5
In the discussion of the logarithmic model, the disturbance term was omitted altogether.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
vXeXY u 2211
uXY logloglog 21
6
However, implicitly it was being assumed that there was an additive disturbance term in the transformed model.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
vXeXY u 2211
uXY logloglog 21
7
For this to be possible, the random component in the original model must be a multiplicative term, eu.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
vXeXY u 2211
uXY logloglog 21
8
We will denote this multiplicative term v.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
vXeXY u 2211
uXY logloglog 21
9
When u is equal to 0, not modifying the value of log Y, v is equal to 1, likewise not modifying the value of Y.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
vXeXY u 2211
uXY logloglog 21
10
Positive values of u correspond to values of v greater than 1, the random factor having a positive effect on Y and log Y. Likewise negative values of u correspond to values of v between 0 and 1, the random factor having a negative effect on Y and log Y.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16v
f(v)
vXeXY u 2211
uXY logloglog 21
11
Besides satisfying the regression model conditions, we need u to be normally distributed if we are to perform t tests and F tests.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16v
f(v)
vXeXY u 2211
uXY logloglog 21
12
This will be the case if v has a lognormal distribution, shown above.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
13
The mode of the distribution is located at v = 1, where u = 0.
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16v
f(v)
vXeXY u 2211
uXY logloglog 21
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
14
The same multiplicative disturbance term is needed in the semilogarithmic model.
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16v
f(v)
veeeY XuX 2211
uXY 21loglog
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
15
Note that, with this distribution, one should expect a small proportion of observations to be subject to large positive random effects.
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16v
f(v)
veeeY XuX 2211
uXY 21loglog
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
16
Here is the scatter diagram for earnings and schooling using Data Set 21. You can see that there are several outliers, with the four most extreme highlighted.
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Years of schooling
Ho
url
y ea
rnin
gs
($)
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
17
Here is the scatter diagram for the semilogarithmic model, with its regression line. The same four observations remain outliers, but they do not appear to be so extreme.
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Years of schooling
Lo
gar
ith
m o
f h
ou
rly
earn
ing
s
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
18
The histogram above compares the distributions of the residuals from the linear and semi-logarithmic regressions. The distributions have been standardized, that is, scaled so that they have standard deviation equal to 1, to make them comparable.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Linear Semilogarithmic
0–1–2–3 1 2 3
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
19
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Linear Semilogarithmic
0–1–2–3 1 2 3
It can be shown that if the disturbance term in a regression model has a normal distribution, so will the residuals.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Linear Semilogarithmic
0–1–2–3 1 2 3
It is obvious that the residuals from the semilogarithmic regression are approximately normal, but those from the linear regression are not. This is evidence that the semi-logarithmic model is the better specification.
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
21
What would happen if the disturbance term in the logarithmic or semilogarithmic model were additive, rather than multiplicative?
uXY 21
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
22
If this were the case, we would not be able to linearize the model by taking logarithms. There is no way of simplifying log(1X + u). We should have to use some nonlinear regression technique.
uXY 21
)log(log 21 uXY
2
THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS
Copyright Christopher Dougherty 2011.
These slideshows may be downloaded by anyone, anywhere for personal use.
Subject to respect for copyright and, where appropriate, attribution, they may be
used as a resource for teaching an econometrics course. There is no need to
refer to the author.
The content of this slideshow comes from Section 4.2 of C. Dougherty,
Introduction to Econometrics, fourth edition 2011, Oxford University Press.
Additional (free) resources for both students and instructors may be
downloaded from the OUP Online Resource Centre
http://www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199567089/.
Individuals studying econometrics on their own and who feel that they might
benefit from participation in a formal course should consider the London School
of Economics summer school course
EC212 Introduction to Econometrics
http://www2.lse.ac.uk/study/summerSchools/summerSchool/Home.aspx
or the University of London International Programmes distance learning course
20 Elements of Econometrics
www.londoninternational.ac.uk/lse.
11.07.25