chronic fatigue syndrome - ghent university€¦ · chronic fatigue syndrome is a widespread...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1 of 25
Academiejaar 2017 – 2018
Chronic fatigue syndrome – an update
Céline VAN GUTTE
Promotor 1: Prof. dr. De Muynck Martine
Promotor 2: Dr. Rimbaut Steven
Masterproef voorgedragen in de master in de specialistische geneeskunde
Fysische geneeskunde & revalidatie
Page 2 of 25
Page 3 of 25
Academiejaar 2017 – 2018
Chronic fatigue syndrome – an update
Céline VAN GUTTE
Promotor 1: Prof. dr. De Muynck Martine
Promotor 2: Dr. Rimbaut Steven
Masterproef voorgedragen in de master in de specialistische geneeskunde
Fysische geneeskunde & revalidatie
Page 4 of 25
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – An Update Steven Rimbaut MD, Céline Van Gutte MD, Lina Van Brabander MD, Luc Vanden Bossche
MD, PHD
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ghent
Page 5 of 25
Abstract The objective of this review is to systematically review the recent literature on chronic fatigue
syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. The published literature between January 1, 1990 and April 1,
2014 was searched using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Sciences databases. The
reference lists of the selected articles were screened for other relevant articles.
Chronic fatigue syndrome is a widespread condition with a huge impact not only on a patient’s life,
but also on society as evidenced by substantial losses of productivity, informal costs and medical
expenses. The high prevalence rates (0.2% - 6.4%) and the low employment rates (27-41%) are
responsible for the enormous burden imposed on society, with loss of productivity representing the
highest cost.
Despite extensive research, none of the proposed etiological factors have shown strong, reproducible
scientific evidence. Over the years the biopsychosocial model integrating many of the proposed
hypotheses has been gaining popularity over the biomedical model where the focus is on one
physical cause. Since the etiological mechanism underlying chronic fatigue syndrome is currently
unknown, disease-specific treatments do not exist. Various treatments have been investigated but
only cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) have shown moderate
effectiveness.
Introduction Fatigue is a common complaint in society. For patients to be diagnosed with chronic fatigue
syndrome, unexplained fatigue must have been present for at least 6 months. Different sets of
criteria have been published, each focusing on different aspects. In literature, this condition is being
referred to as “chronic fatigue syndrome” or “myalgic encephalomyelitis”.
This review is designed to update and critically review the recent literature on CFS. We especially
focused on the recent insights concerning post exertional malaise and on the biopsychosocial model.
In addition, we collected recent literature data on the costs associated with chronic fatigue
syndrome. Because of its chronic nature, the condition has a huge impact not only on a patient’s life
but also on society as evidenced by substantial losses of productivity, informal costs and medical
expenses.
Methods The published literature between January 1, 1990 and April 1, 2015 was searched using the MEDLINE,
Cochrane Library, and Web of Sciences databases. In addition, the reference lists of the selected
studies and review articles were screened for potentially relevant citations. Only peer-reviewed
articles in English, French and Dutch were included. The following terms were used: chronic fatigue
syndrome, myalgic encephalomyelitis, history, criteria, diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis,
therapy, treatment, prognosis, costs, employment. Patients had to fulfill one of the published criteria.
(Carruthers B et al. 2003;Fukuda et al. 1994;Holmes et al. 1988;Lloyd et al. 1990;Sharpe et al. 1991)
Only studies and articles on adult populations >18 years were used. Observational and interventional
designs were accepted. Results were considered significant when P<0.05.
Page 6 of 25
History Over time, many names have been used to define chronic fatigue syndrome or CFS.
In 1881, Beard (1881) described a similar syndrome as “neurasthenia”.(Beard GM 1881) The place of
outbreak was also considered in labelling the condition. (Parish 1978) In 1934, an outbreak occurred
at the Los Angeles General Hospital where 198 employees suffered from rapid muscle weakness,
clonic twitches and cramps, ataxia, severe pain aggravated by exercise and neck and back stiffness. In
1937 and 1939, two outbreaks with similar symptoms were reported in Switzerland. After an
outbreak in Iceland in 1948-1949, the term “Akuryri disease” was used. In 1955, at the Royal Free
Hospital in London, 292 patients suffered from fever and persistent fatigue. From then on, the name
“Royal Free Disease” was used.
In 1984, researchers described the chronic Epstein-Barr virus syndrome or chronic mononucleosis-
like syndrome. (DuBois et al. 1984) It was characterized by a combination of atypical symptoms
(fatigue, sore throat, fever, myalgia, painful lymph nodes, etc) in the absence of any objective clinical
signs. The hypothesis at that time suggested a latent Epstein-Barr infection, although no antibodies
were detected in the serum of patients.
Other commonly used names include chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome, post-viral
syndrome and low natural killer cell syndrome, the last term being particularly used in Japan. (Aoki et
al. 1987;Straus et al. 1985)
Aspecific physical and psychological complaints emerging after the Gulf war in 1991-1992, were
designated as the Gulf war syndrome and showed similarities with CFS. (Kilshaw S 2004)
Currently chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis are commonly used to describe
CFS.
The term chronic fatigue syndrome appeared in the 1980 to define the syndrome without knowing
the exact aetiology of the disease. (Holmes, Kaplan, Gantz, Komaroff, Schonberger, Straus, Jones,
DuBois, Cunningham-Rundles, Pahwa, & . 1988) It was worldwide accepted after the publication of a
set of criteria by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1994.
(Fukuda, Straus, Hickie, Sharpe, Dobbins, & Komaroff 1994)
In 1956, Acheson (1956) described myalgic encephalomyelitis using the following characteristics:
presence of symptoms that imply damage to the brain or the spine, muscle soreness, emotional
disturbances, no irregularities in the cerebrospinal fluid and involvement of the reticuloendothelial
system. (Acheson DE 1956)
Currently, the two terms are used interchangeably despite different diagnostic criteria.
Diagnostic criteria Many sets of diagnostic criteria have been developed to confirm the diagnosis of unexplained
fatigue.
In 1988, the CDC proposed a set of major and minor criteria. (Holmes, Kaplan, Gantz, Komaroff,
Schonberger, Straus, Jones, DuBois, Cunningham-Rundles, Pahwa, & . 1988) The two major criteria
Page 7 of 25
and at least 8/11 of the minor criteria had to be met for a definite diagnosis of CFS. The major criteria
were a new onset of persistent or relapsing debilitating fatigue not resolving with bed rest and
causing reduced daily activity. Other clinical conditions that may produce similar symptoms must be
excluded. The minor symptoms consisted of low-grade fever, sore throat, tender lymph nodes,
muscle weakness, muscle pain, postexertional fatigue, headache, arthralgia, neuropsychological
complaints and sleep disturbances. These symptoms had to coincide with or follow the onset of
fatigue. In addition, the complaints must have been present for at least 6 months.
In 1994, Fukuda et al. (1994) altered those criteria to enhance the applicability in clinical practice.
(Table 1) (Fukuda, Straus, Hickie, Sharpe, Dobbins, & Komaroff 1994) The number of symptoms
required to establish the diagnosis were reduced to 9. Beyond persistent fatigue for at least 6
months, patients had to present at least 4/8 other symptoms. Other possible physical and mental
conditions had to be excluded. (Table 2) Importantly, a treated major depression was not an
exclusion criterion.
When the inclusion criteria were not met but CFS-like symptoms were present, the condition was
classified as “clinically evaluated unexplained chronic fatigue”.
Major and minor symptoms
Ma
jor
sym
pto
m
Obligatory
Clinically evaluated, unexplained, persistent or relapsing chronic fatigue that is of new or definite onset (not lifelong); is not the result of ongoing exertion; is not substantially alleviated by rest; and results in substantial reduction in previous levels of occupational, educational, social, or personal activities. The fatigue needs to be present for at least 6 months
Min
or
sym
pto
ms
4/8 required (for at least 6 months)
Tender cervical or axillary lymph nodes Sore throat Muscle pain Multi-joint pain without joint swelling or
redness Headaches of a new type, pattern or severity Unrefreshing sleep Post-exertion malaise lasting more than 24
hours Self-reported impairment in short-term
memory or concentration severe enough to cause substantial reduction in previous levels of occupational, educational, social, or personal activities
Table 1: Fukuda criteria (2)
Page 8 of 25
Permanent medical exclusions
Temporary medical exclusions
Permanent psychiatric exclusions
Organ failure Conditions that resolved (e.g., pregnancy until 3 months post-partum, breastfeeding, major surgery until 6 months post-operation, minor surgery until 3 months post-operation, major infections such as sepsis or pneumonia until 3 months post-resolution)
Bipolar affective disorders
Chronic infections Major conditions the resolution of which may be unclear for at least 5 years (e.g., myocardial infarction, heart failure)
Schizophrenia
Rheumatic and chronic inflammatory diseases
Morbid obesity (BMI>45) Delusional disorders
Major neurologic diseases Dementias
Diseases requiring systemic treatment
Organic brain disorders
Major endocrine diseases Alcohol or substance abuse within 2 years of onset of fatiguing illness
Primary sleep disorders Anorexia nervosa or bulemia nervosa
Table 2: Exclusion criteria published by Fukuda et al (2)
The more stringent Canadian criteria published in 2003, with an update in 2011, added other
categories of symptoms to the prior list, such as autonomic symptoms, neuro-endocrine symptoms
and immunological symptoms. (Carruthers B, Jain A, De Meirleir K, Peterson D, & Klimas A
2003;Carruthers et al. 2011) A small study compared CFS patients diagnosed on the basis of the
Canadian or Fukuda criteria with patients with fatigue explained by psychiatric diseases. (Jason et al.
2003) In contrast to the Fukuda criteria, the Canadian criteria selected cases with less psychiatric
comorbidity, more physical functional impairment, more fatigue/ weakness and more neurological
symptoms. Two recent studies again showed that patients meeting the Canadian criteria had more
functional impairments and more severe physical and cognitive symptoms than the subgroup only
meeting the Fukuda criteria.(Jason et al. 2013;Johnston et al. 2014)
Other sets of criteria are the Oxford criteria (1991) and the Australian criteria (1990). (Lloyd, Hickie,
Boughton, Spencer, & Wakefield 1990;Sharpe, Archard, Banatvala, Borysiewicz, Clare, David,
Edwards, Hawton, Lambert, Lane, & . 1991)
Health care workers predominantly use the Fukuda criteria to settle on a diagnosis of CFS because of
their easy applicability in clinical practice. (Fukuda, Straus, Hickie, Sharpe, Dobbins, & Komaroff 1994)
Most of the clinical trials are based on these criteria.
Page 9 of 25
Although a clinical case definition is a well-established instrument, its strict application may not
always be appropriate in the evaluation of a specific patient.
The physical and mental symptoms of CFS show a fluctuating pattern in which moderate activities are
alternated with prolonged inactivity, having a dramatic impact on the patients’ functional status and
well-being. (Wallman et al. 2005) Limitations involve every aspect of their life such as social activities,
leisures, relations, work and education.
Numerous authors developed guidelines for the approach of patients with unexplained persistent
fatigue. (Fukuda, Straus, Hickie, Sharpe, Dobbins, & Komaroff 1994;Sharpe 2002) Since there are no
investigative tools or clear physical signs to establish the diagnosis, CFS remains a diagnosis of
exclusion. First of all, patients have to meet the aforementioned diagnostic criteria. In addition,
other possible etiologies have to be ruled out by a thorough medical and psychological history,
physical examination, mental status examination, laboratory screening and other technical
investigations, if required. Exhaustive sets of technical investigations and unnecessary repetitions of
the same examination must be avoided. Detailed laboratory investigations disclose the etiology in
only 5-8% of the patients with prolonged fatigue. (Koch et al. 2009;Lane et al. 1990)
Mariman et al (2013) showed that only 23.3% of patients with chronic unexplained fatigue referred
to a tertiary care center were diagnosed with unequivocal CFS. (Mariman et al. 2013a) In 21.1% of
patients, CFS was associated with a sleeping disorder and/or psychiatric disorder. Obstructive sleep
apnea (OSA) was the most common sleeping disorder (28.7%) while a mood disorder was the most
common psychiatric comorbidity (26.5%). Accordingly, in the diagnosis of CFS, attention must be paid
to these common comorbidities and correct diagnostic steps must be taken for their exclusion.
Epidemiology Based on the available criteria, epidemiological data can be collected. Due to the different case –
definitions of CFS in use, there is a wide variance of prevalence estimates, ranging from a prevalence
of 0.2% in the UK to 6.4% in Hong Kong (Fukuda criteria). (Nacul et al. 2011;Yiu and Qiu 2005)
Researchers in Japan found a prevalence of 1.5% (95% CI 0.4-5.2%) (Fukuda criteria), while a larger
study in Korea reported a prevalence of 0.6% (95% CI 0.2-1.0%) (Fukuda criteria). (Kawakami et al.
1998;Kim et al. 2005) The first prevalence study in a developing country (Nigeria) showed a CFS
prevalence of 0.68%. (Njoku et al. 2007) Prevalence rates in the US range from 0.2% to 2.5%. (Reeves
et al. 2007;Steele et al. 1998)
An English study in which CFS patients were identified using both the Fukuda and the Canadian
criteria, found an overall prevalence rate of 0.2%. (Nacul, Lacerda, Pheby, Campion, Molokhia,
Fayyaz, Leite, Poland, Howe, & Drachler 2011) The prevalence rates of cases meeting the Fukuda
criteria was 0.19%, while only 0.11% of patients confirmed to the Canadian criteria. All but one of the
cases complying with the Canadian criteria also met the Fukuda criteria. The patients meeting the
Canadian criteria had more severe symptoms compared to the other group.
Chronic fatigue syndrome is more common in women than in men, affecting mainly 30 to 40 year
old, successful women living in developed countries. (Jason et al. 1999;Lloyd, Hickie, Boughton,
Spencer, & Wakefield 1990;Steele, Dobbins, Fukuda, Reyes, Randall, Koppelman, & Reeves 1998) A
recent Norwegian study showed 2 age peaks in the incidence of CFS: 10-19 years old and 30-39 years
Page 10 of 25
old.(Bakken et al. 2014) They found an incidence of 25.8 per 100,000 person years (95% confidence
interval (CI): 25.2 to 26.5), with a female to male incidence rate ratio of 3.2 (95% CI: 3.0 to 3.4).
A huge overlap exists between fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic fatigue syndrome. (Aaron et al. 2000) It
has been estimated that 20% to 70% of patients with FM meet the criteria for CFS. Conversely, 35%
to 70% of those with CFS also have FM. Again largely different rates have been reported.
Etiopathogenesis Over the recent decades, considerable effort has been made to identify the possible underlying
mechanism of CFS. The most widely investigated hypotheses are infectious causes, immune
dysfunction, sleeping disorders, endocrine-metabolic dysfunction and neuropsychiatric factors.
However, strong reproducible scientific evidence is yet to be produced.
Because the syndrome can start with flu-like symptoms, a huge number of possible micro-organisms
have been implicated in the development of CFS, but evidence for this hypothesis has never been
found.
One study investigated the seroprevalence of 13 viruses in patients with CFS or chronic fatigue and
healthy controls, but failed to demonstrate an association with any of the following viruses: herpes
simplex 1 and 2, rubella, adenovirus, human herpes virus 6, epstein-barr virus (EBV), cytomegaly
virus (CMV) and coxsackie B virus types 1-6. (Buchwald et al. 1996) Those viruses were suggested
because most of them persist perpetually and sporadically reactivate. A more recent study focused
on the serological status of monozygotic twins, of which one twin was diagnosed with CFS. (Koelle et
al. 2002) No significant difference was found in serological status or DNA detection for human herpes
virus-6-8, CMV, herpes simplex virus-1,2, hepatitis C virus, EBV, varicella zoster virus, John
Cunningham virus, BK virus and parvovirus B19
In 2009, Lombardi et al (2009) reported the involvement of a retrovirus, xenotropic murine leukemia
virus-related virus (XMRV), in the pathophysiology of CFS. (Lombardi et al. 2009) They identified DNA
from XMRV in 68 of 101 CFS patients compared to 8 of 218 healthy controls. Even though they
provided strong evidence for this hypothesis, subsequent studies failed to reproduce these
results.(Alter et al. 2012;Rasa et al. 2014;Simmons et al. 2011)
Lo et al studied the role of another virus, murine leukemia virus (MLV), in CFS. (Lo et al. 2010) They
detected the virus in 32 of 37 CFS patients (86.5%) compared with only 3 of 44 (6.8%) healthy
volunteer blood donors.
A multicenter blinded analysis tried to reproduce those results, but found no association between
CFS and XMR Virus and MLV. (Alter, Mikovits, Switzer, Ruscetti, Lo, Klimas, Komaroff, Montoya,
Bateman, Levine, Peterson, Levin, Hanson, Genfi, Bhat, Zheng, Wang, Li, Hung, Lee, Sameroff,
Heneine, Coffin, Hornig, & Lipkin 2012) In this study, blood samples from CFS patients and healthy
controls were sent to three laboratories that had participated in earlier studies on XMRV. The results
were all negative for DNA from XMRV or MLV. The previous positive results were most likely caused
by contamination with mouse DNA or laboratory reagents. The original report of an association
between XMRV and CFS was later fully retracted due to concerns regarding the validity of the results.
Page 11 of 25
(Lombardi, Ruscetti, Das, Pfost, Hagen, Peterson, Ruscetti, Bagni, Petrow-Sadowski, Gold, Dean,
Silverman, & Mikovits 2009)
A number of studies have suggested the possible involvement of toxins in CFS. (Devanur and Kerr
2006) Some of the toxins focused on were organophosphates, cituatera fish toxin, pesticides and
mould. Until now, no strong evidence exists that these toxins might be the cause of CFS. The same
applies to vaccinations. Various vaccines have been reported to trigger CFS, but again, substantial
evidence is lacking.
Another possible pathway to CFS is a disruption of the immune system of patients with CFS. In recent
decades, dozens of papers have been published regarding abnormalities of the immune system.
(Natelson et al. 2002) However, not a single marker was found that was consistently aberrant in the
different studies. Some of the differences seen in CFS are increased inflammation and pro-
inflammatory cytokines (IL 1, IL6 and TNF alfa). (Bansal et al. 2012) Impaired natural killer cell
function and an alteration in T cell numbers have also been shown to occur.
Although the immune system may play an important part in the pathophysiology of CFS, its exact
role remains obscure and the various studies have reported divergent, moderate and sometimes
even conflicting results regarding the involvement of an immune dysfunction in CFS.
Several metabolic abnormalities have been described, but the exact mechanism or involvement is
still elusive. Focusing on the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, a recent meta-
analysis showed an attenuation of cortisol secretory activity, with a decreased dynamic response to
waking and variations in circadian activity. (Powell et al. 2013) However, the current evidence is not
strong enough to allow any conclusions regarding the approach to CFS patients.
Since unrefreshing sleep is one of the diagnostic criteria of CFS, many studies have investigated a
possible link with a sleeping disorder. Currently substantial evidence of significant abnormalities in
the sleeping pattern of CFS patients is lacking. (Jackson and Bruck 2012;Mariman et al. 2013b)
Mariman et al (2013) found a sleeping disorder to be present in 18.6% of CFS –patients, 22.2% were
not diagnosed with CFS because of a predominant sleeping disorder.(Mariman, Delesie, Tobback,
Hanoulle, Sermijn, Vermeir, Pevernagie, & Vogelaers 2013a) OSA was the most prevalent sleeping
disorder (28.7% of patients). A comparative study by Libman et al found no significant differences
between CFS patients with and without OSA regarding subjective sleep variables and CFS
symptoms.(Libman et al. 2009) Treating OSA with nasal continuous positive airway pressure had no
effect on those parameters. A study by Gotts et al showed a negative influence of daytime napping
on cognitive functioning and daytime sleepiness in patients with CFS. (Gotts et al. 2015)
Another possible theory is central nervous system involvement, and more in particular the role of
cerebral perfusion and alterations in grey and white matter. (de Lange et al. 2005;Lange et al.
1999;Yoshiuchi et al. 2006) To date no significant, reproducible aberrations have been found.
In a study of the serotonergic system in CFS patients, Smith et al. found three markers in the
serotonin receptor to be associated with an enhanced activity of the receptor in CFS patients. (Smith
et al. 2008) This abnormality was associated with a reduction in general health, vitality and social
function which suggests that CFS patients might experience difficulties in managing stress reactions.
Page 12 of 25
Emotional factors seem to play an important role in the etiopathogenesis of CFS. Recent studies
showed a significantly higher prevalence of CFS in abused children.(Heim et al. 2006;Heim et al.
2009;Heins et al. 2011) Particularly more prevalent was a history of emotional abuse (10.6%-13% CFS
patients vs 4%-7.7% controls), emotional neglect (11%-24% vs 7.9%-8.1%) and physical abuse (6%-9%
vs 1%-6.9%). Some characteristics were more common in patients with CFS. A recent study by
Kempke et al. showed a negative influence of self-critical perfectionism on fatigue and pain in CFS
patients. (Kempke et al. 2013)
Several surveys among CFS patients showed that doctor-patient relationships were not optimal in the
majority of patients. (Deale and Wessely 2001) Among other things, unhelpful or distressing
consultations, disbelief and miscommunication were reported. On the other hand many doctors
were dissatisfied with or uncertain about the care they provided and considered treating CFS
patients as time -consuming. These facts are in sharp contrast with the importance of a good
professional relationship between patient and health-care provider. Not only should the patient be
given the best possible support, but one should also be alert to alarming symptoms in the future.
These findings can be explained by the lack of consensus regarding the etiopathogenesis and the
standard treatment.
Cella et al (2013) studied the prevalence of comorbid psychiatric diagnoses in 640 patients with CFS.
(Cella et al. 2013) Of those patients, 14% had an anxiety disorder, 14% also had a depressive disorder
and 18% had both depression and anxiety disorders. Beliefs about damage and symptom focusing
were more frequent in CFS –patients with anxiety disorders, while CFS patients with a concomitant
depressive disorder showed more embarrassment and behavioural avoidance. Mariman et al (2013)
found lower prevalences of comorbid psychiatric disorders (only 5% of patients had a comorbid
disorder).(Mariman, Delesie, Tobback, Hanoulle, Sermijn, Vermeir, Pevernagie, & Vogelaers 2013a)
However 19.0% of patients referred to a tertiary center for unexplained fatigue were not diagnosed
with CFS because of a predominant psychiatric disorder, mainly mood disorders and anxiety
disorders. In 14.3% of patients, the diagnosis of a cluster B and C personality disorder was made.
In 2011, Light et al (2011) studied alterations in gene expression at baseline and after exercise, but
found no difference between CFS patients and healthy controls. (Light et al. 2012) Shortly after
exercise, however, the expression of adrenergic a-2A receptors was increased. This was associated
with physical and mental fatigue and pain. The increased expression was more obvious in patients
experiencing more severe symptoms. Another study showed the presence of single nucleotide
polymorphism in the genes responsible for brain function, stress reactions, emotional responses,
generation and maintenance of memory. (Goertzel et al. 2006)
A recent study investigated functional capacity and postexertion fatigue in 51 CFS patients and 10
healthy controls during two cardiopulmonary exercise tests with a 24-hour interval. (Snell et al. 2013)
All participants reached their peak workload, but in the CFS group peak workload was significantly
lower than in the control group (P=0.005). The CFS patients were unable to reproduce their
performance of the first test during the second test, in contrast to the control group. This particularly
applied to the peak workload. This study also showed a decreased workload at the ventilatory
threshold in CFS patients. Similar results were obtained by Keller et al. (Keller et al. 2014) These
findings need to be further investigated.
Page 13 of 25
Over the years, the biopsychosocial model integrating many of the earlier mentioned hypotheses,
has been gaining popularity over the biomedical model where the focus is on one physical cause.
(Figure 1) (Harvey and Wessely 2009) Certain individuals are more prone to develop CFS, eg those
with psychiatric disorders, perfectionism, psychosocial problems, childhood stressors and an
overactive lifestyle. This premorbid risk is followed by an acute event, eg infection or stress, leading
to fatigue. The developing fatigue due to the triggering event is maintained by prolonged bed rest,
negative self-efficacy, dramatic fluctuations in activity levels and biological disturbances among other
things.
· Immunological dysfunction?
· Neuro-endocrine dysfunction?
· Sleep disorders?
· Others?
· Infections
· Psychosocial stress
· Psychiatric disorders
· Personality
· Lifestyle
· Psychosocial stress
Predisposing factors
Precipitating factorsCentral nervous system
Chronic fatigue syndrome
· Wrong attributions
· Avoidance behavior
· Untreated psychiatric disorders
· Iatrogenic
Persisting factors
Possible mechanism
Figure 1: Etiopathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome: biopsychosocial model
Therapy Since the causes of CFS have not been identified, disease-specific treatments do not exist. Various
treatments have been researched but only cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and graded exercise
therapy (GET) have shown moderate effectiveness. These two therapies interfere with the
maintaining factors of the biopsychosocial model.(Harvey & Wessely 2009)
The primary goal of CBT is to obtain control of the symptoms. (Stordeur S et al. 2013) Dysfunctional
beliefs and thoughts are dealt with and harmful or unhelpful behavior is changed through
therapeutic sessions. The main principle of GET is avoidance of physical deconditioning from
prolonged rest and a gradual return to appropriate physical activities.(White et al. 2011) An exercise
program is devised by a therapist to improve the patient’s aerobic condition. This program consists of
individually set schedules, which are gradually increased with participant feedback and mutual
planning.
Page 14 of 25
Several studies showed a reduction of fatigue and functional impairment following CBT in the short
term (6-12 months). (Stordeur S, Thiry N, & Eyssen M 2013) Deal et al. followed CFS patients for 5
years after the completion of therapy. (Deale et al. 2001) The global improvement in the CBT group
was greater than in the relaxation therapy group. A recent study showed a negative influence from
solicitous responses of the partner on fatigue and disability. (Verspaandonk et al. 2015) This aspect
needs to be included in CBT-programs. The large PACE TRIAL compared CBT with GET, specialist
medical care alone and adaptive pacing therapy. (White, Goldsmith, Johnson, Potts, Walwyn,
DeCesare, Baber, Burgess, Clark, Cox, Bavinton, Angus, Murphy, Murphy, O'Dowd, Wilks, McCrone,
Chalder, & Sharpe 2011) Fatigue and physical function were improved in both the CBT and GET
groups compared to the specialist medical care group (P<0.05). Other studies comparing GET with
different treatments showed improvement of fatigue, quality of life and functional work capacity.
(Stordeur S, Thiry N, & Eyssen M 2013) Currently, there is no evidence that GET is harmful in CFS
patients. (Stordeur S, Thiry N, & Eyssen M 2013)
Mindfulness-based therapy has also achieved some positive effects such as a reduction in fatigue
levels, pain, anxiety and depression (Fjorback et al. 2013), but further research is mandatory.
Following an isometric yoga program can reduce fatigue complaints. (Oka et al. 2014)
The main goal of pacing therapy, another aspect of many of the current exercise programs, is to
achieve adaptation to the perceived illness by planning and pacing the patients’ activities according
to their available energy in order to reduce or avoid fatigue. (White, Goldsmith, Johnson, Potts,
Walwyn, DeCesare, Baber, Burgess, Clark, Cox, Bavinton, Angus, Murphy, Murphy, O'Dowd, Wilks,
McCrone, Chalder, & Sharpe 2011) In this way, exacerbations can be prevented. Increased activities
are encouraged as long as they do not trigger an exacerbation of the symptoms. The largest study on
the pacing theory did not show a significant reduction of fatigue compared with specialist medical
care.
An Australian study showed that CFS patients use a large variety of medications and supplements,
with an average of 5 per patient. (Kreijkamp-Kaspers et al. 2011) The most commonly used medicines
were antidepressants (41% of patients) and sedatives (27%). Another recent American study
reported similar numbers. (Boneva et al. 2009) The participating CFS patients took an average of 5.8
drugs or supplements with outliers of 19 drugs or supplements. In this study, 74% of CFS patients
took pain relievers, 41% took antidepressants and 20% took sedatives. The use of these three drugs
was significantly higher compared to the findings in a healthy control group (p>0.05). Beside 1
recent, positive result with coenzyme Q10 on fatigue that needs to be confirmed, to date not one
type of drugs or supplements has shown a significantly positive result in patients with CFS. (Castro-
Marrero et al. 2015;Kreijkamp-Kaspers, Brenu, Marshall, Staines, & Van Driel 2011)
With patients taking so many different drugs and supplements, side effects and drug interactions are
common. Avoiding unnecessary use of multiple drugs and supplements needs to be of great concern
to health-care workers.
Prognosis Percentages for recovery rates and improvement of CFS patients differ largely. (Cairns and Hotopf
2005) The spontaneous full recovery rate ranges from 0-12%. Spontaneous improvement during
follow-up ranges from 8-63%. Two studies investigated the effect of CBT on the prognosis of CFS.
Page 15 of 25
(Deale, Husain, Chalder, & Wessely 2001;Prins et al. 2001) Following CBT, 50%- 68% of patients
reported an improvement after 1-5 years. After 5 years the recovery rate was 24%.
Two factors were associated with a better outcome: a sense of control over the symptoms and not
attributing illness to a physical cause. Darbishire et al explored the role of baseline characteristics in
the prognosis of CFS after GET or CBT. (Darbishire et al. 2005) Only functional impairment and
greater perceived negative consequences were predictors for the final outcome.
Economic impact and employment Several case-control studies found a significant difference in employment rates between CFS patients
and healthy controls (Claypoole et al. 2001;Garcia-Borreguero et al. 1998;Vercoulen et al. 1997).
Employment rates ranged between 27% and 41% for CFS patients compared to 86-100% for healthy
controls. Recently, Collin et al. reported an employment rate of 40.7% among CFS patients; 34%
discontinued working permanently because of fatigue-related symptoms. (Collin et al. 2011) Those
who ceased working had significantly lower SF36 scores than those who had a job. Physical function
was a major factor in continuing or ceasing work. In 2004, Reynolds et al. showed an 27% overall
reduction in employment attributable to CFS (Reynolds et al. 2004). Overall, employment declined
from 72.3% to 54.8% for women and from 86.1% to 63.3% for men.
With regard to the economic impact of CFS, different aspects need to be considered: loss of
productivity of patients, health care expenditures and informal costs, including unpaid services
provided by friends and family because patients are unable to care for themselves.
The high rate of unemployment entails a huge loss of productivity. Reynolds et al. calculated an
annual loss of approximately $20,000 dollar per person with CFS, which totaled $9.1 billion in the US
in 2002; 75% of this sum was due to lost labor force productivity and 25% to lost household
productivity or informal care. (Reynolds, Vernon, Bouchery, & Reeves 2004) These calculations did
not include the health care expenses. The study by Lin et al only included loss in productivity and
direct medical costs.(Lin et al. 2011) The combined economic burden of CFS (direct and indirect
costs) was $11,780, 82% of which was caused by loss of productivity.
McCrone et al (2003) reported similar results. (McCrone et al. 2003) They calculated a total cost of
£3515 (standard deviation 4360) per person with CFS over a 3-month period, including loss of
productivity, health care expenditures and informal care.
Sabes-Figuera et al (2010) found a lower cost £3878 (standard deviation 4573) over a 6-month period
(Sabes-Figuera et al. 2010). In this British study, unpaid informal care accounted for as much as
26.4%, while productivity losses represented 60.6% and health care expenses only 13%.
Also in the UK, Collin et al (2011) investigated the total productivity cost for patients attending
specialized care facilities for CFS. (Collin, Crawley, May, Sterne, & Hollingworth 2011) They calculated
a total productivity cost of £49.2 million (£22,684 per patient) based on the available data.
Extrapolating this to the whole UK population would result in a total annual productivity cost of
£102.2 million for patients attending specialized medical care. Because Collin et al only used data
from patients in specialized care, the total productivity cost for all CFS patients might have been
underestimated.
Page 16 of 25
Since different countries have different health care systems, a thorough comparison of costs is
difficult.
Conclusion Chronic fatigue syndrome has a huge impact on a patient’s life. Several case definitions have been
proposed, each focusing on different aspects. In establishing the diagnosis of CFS it is important to
rule out other possible causes for the experienced symptoms. Recently it has been shown that only
23.3% of the patients with unexplained fatigue are diagnosed with CFS in a tertiary center.(Mariman,
Delesie, Tobback, Hanoulle, Sermijn, Vermeir, Pevernagie, & Vogelaers 2013a) Particularly sleeping
disorders and psychiatric disorders need to be ruled out.
Currently, a single, evidence-based etiopathogenetic mechanism for the syndrome is lacking,
although many different hypotheses have been advanced. Over the years, the biopsychosocial model
integrating many of the proposed hypotheses (psychological predisposing and persisting factors, and
psychological or physical precipitating factors) has been gaining popularity. (Harvey & Wessely 2009)
As long as the etiopathogenesis of CFS is not completely understood, therapy should be based on
these findings. The primary goal of CBT is to obtain control of the symptoms. (Stordeur S, Thiry N, &
Eyssen M 2013) The main principle of GET is avoidance of physical deconditioning from prolonged
rest and a gradual return to appropriate physical activities.(White, Goldsmith, Johnson, Potts,
Walwyn, DeCesare, Baber, Burgess, Clark, Cox, Bavinton, Angus, Murphy, Murphy, O'Dowd, Wilks,
McCrone, Chalder, & Sharpe 2011)
Two recent studies investigated functional capacity and post exertion fatigue in CFS patients and
healthy controls during two cardiopulmonary exercise tests with a 24-hour interval. (Snell, Stevens,
Davenport, & Van Ness 2013) Strikingly, CFS patients were unable to reproduce their initial
performance 24 hours later, while healthy controls did manage to do so. Whether this is due to
deconditioning or other underlying factors needs to be further investigated.
The high prevalence rates (0.2%-6.4%) and the low employment rates (27-41%) are responsible for
the huge burden imposed on society. (Claypoole, Mahurin, Fischer, Goldberg, Schmaling, Schoene,
Ashton, & Buchwald 2001;Garcia-Borreguero, Dale, Rosenthal, Chiara, O'Fallon, Bartko, & Straus
1998;Nacul, Lacerda, Pheby, Campion, Molokhia, Fayyaz, Leite, Poland, Howe, & Drachler
2011;Vercoulen, Bazelmans, Swanink, Fennis, Galama, Jongen, Hommes, van der Meer, & Bleijenberg
1997;Yiu & Qiu 2005) Exact numbers differ greatly between studies, depending on the country in
which the study was performed. However, all studies showed that the loss of productivity represents
the highest cost for society. Since CFS is a chronic condition, the costs become permanent.
Therefore, it is essential that specific actions be taken to encourage a return to work.
References
AARON, L. A., BURKE, M. M. & BUCHWALD, D. (2000) Overlapping conditions among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and temporomandibular disorder. Arch.Intern.Med., 160, (2) 221-227.
Page 17 of 25
ACHESON DE (1956) A new clinical entity? 267 ed.
ALTER, H. J., MIKOVITS, J. A., SWITZER, W. M., RUSCETTI, F. W., LO, S. C., KLIMAS, N., KOMAROFF, A. L., MONTOYA, J. G., BATEMAN, L., LEVINE, S., PETERSON, D., LEVIN, B., HANSON, M. R., GENFI, A., BHAT, M., ZHENG, H., WANG, R., LI, B., HUNG, G. C., LEE, L. L., SAMEROFF, S., HENEINE, W., COFFIN, J., HORNIG, M. & LIPKIN, W. I. (2012) A multicenter blinded analysis indicates no association between chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis and either xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus or polytropic murine leukemia virus. MBio., 3, (5).
AOKI, T., USUDA, Y., MIYAKOSHI, H., TAMURA, K. & HERBERMAN, R. B. (1987) Low natural killer syndrome: clinical and immunologic features. Nat.Immun.Cell Growth Regul., 6, (3) 116-128.
BAKKEN, I. J., TVEITO, K., GUNNES, N., GHADERI, S., STOLTENBERG, C., TROGSTAD, L., HABERG, S. E. & MAGNUS, P. (2014) Two age peaks in the incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: a population-based registry study from Norway 2008-2012. BMC.Med., 12, (1) 167.
BANSAL, A. S., BRADLEY, A. S., BISHOP, K. N., KIANI-ALIKHAN, S. & FORD, B. (2012) Chronic fatigue syndrome, the immune system and viral infection. Brain Behav.Immun., 26, (1) 24-31.
BEARD GM (1881) American Nervousness, its causes and consequences: A supplement to nervous exhaustion (neurasthenia).
BONEVA, R. S., LIN, J. M., MALONEY, E. M., JONES, J. F. & REEVES, W. C. (2009) Use of medications by people with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy persons: a population-based study of fatiguing illness in Georgia. Health Qual.Life Outcomes., 7, 67.
BUCHWALD, D., ASHLEY, R. L., PEARLMAN, T., KITH, P. & KOMAROFF, A. L. (1996) Viral serologies in patients with chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome. J.Med.Virol., 50, (1) 25-30.
CAIRNS, R. & HOTOPF, M. (2005) A systematic review describing the prognosis of chronic fatigue syndrome. Occup.Med.(Lond), 55, (1) 20-31.
CARRUTHERS B, JAIN A, DE MEIRLEIR K, PETERSON D & KLIMAS A (2003) Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: Clinical working case definition, diagnostic and treatment protocols. 11 ed.
CARRUTHERS, B. M., VAN DE SANDE, M. I., DE MEIRLEIR, K. L., KLIMAS, N. G., BRODERICK, G., MITCHELL, T., STAINES, D., POWLES, A. C., SPEIGHT, N., VALLINGS, R., BATEMAN, L., BAUMGARTEN-AUSTRHEIM, B., BELL, D. S., CARLO-STELLA, N., CHIA, J., DARRAGH, A., JO, D., LEWIS, D., LIGHT, A. R., MARSHALL-GRADISBIK, S., MENA, I., MIKOVITS, J. A., MIWA, K., MUROVSKA, M., PALL, M. L. & STEVENS, S. (2011) Myalgic encephalomyelitis: International Consensus Criteria. J.Intern.Med., 270, (4) 327-338.
CASTRO-MARRERO, J., CORDERO, M. D., SEGUNDO, M. J., SAEZ-FRANCAS, N., CALVO, N., ROMAN-MALO, L., ALISTE, L., FERNANDEZ DE, S. T. & ALEGRE, J. (2015) Does oral coenzyme Q10 plus NADH supplementation improve fatigue and biochemical parameters in chronic fatigue syndrome? Antioxid.Redox.Signal., 22, (8) 679-685.
CELLA, M., WHITE, P. D., SHARPE, M. & CHALDER, T. (2013) Cognitions, behaviours and co-morbid psychiatric diagnoses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychol.Med., 43, (2) 375-380.
Page 18 of 25
CLAYPOOLE, K., MAHURIN, R., FISCHER, M. E., GOLDBERG, J., SCHMALING, K. B., SCHOENE, R. B., ASHTON, S. & BUCHWALD, D. (2001) Cognitive compromise following exercise in monozygotic twins discordant for chronic fatigue syndrome: fact or artifact? Appl.Neuropsychol., 8, (1) 31-40.
COLLIN, S. M., CRAWLEY, E., MAY, M. T., STERNE, J. A. & HOLLINGWORTH, W. (2011) The impact of CFS/ME on employment and productivity in the UK: a cross-sectional study based on the CFS/ME national outcomes database. BMC.Health Serv.Res., 11, 217.
DARBISHIRE, L., SEED, P. & RIDSDALE, L. (2005) Predictors of outcome following treatment for chronic fatigue. Br.J.Psychiatry, 186, 350-351.
DE LANGE, F. P., KALKMAN, J. S., BLEIJENBERG, G., HAGOORT, P., VAN DER MEER, J. W. & TONI, I. (2005) Gray matter volume reduction in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuroimage., 26, (3) 777-781.
DEALE, A., HUSAIN, K., CHALDER, T. & WESSELY, S. (2001) Long-term outcome of cognitive behavior therapy versus relaxation therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a 5-year follow-up study. Am.J.Psychiatry, 158, (12) 2038-2042.
DEALE, A. & WESSELY, S. (2001) Patients' perceptions of medical care in chronic fatigue syndrome. Soc.Sci.Med., 52, (12) 1859-1864.
DEVANUR, L. D. & KERR, J. R. (2006) Chronic fatigue syndrome. J.Clin.Virol., 37, (3) 139-150.
DUBOIS, R. E., SEELEY, J. K., BRUS, I., SAKAMOTO, K., BALLOW, M., HARADA, S., BECHTOLD, T. A., PEARSON, G. & PURTILO, D. T. (1984) Chronic mononucleosis syndrome. South.Med.J., 77, (11) 1376-1382.
FJORBACK, L. O., ARENDT, M., ORNBOL, E., WALACH, H., REHFELD, E., SCHRODER, A. & FINK, P. (2013) Mindfulness therapy for somatization disorder and functional somatic syndromes: randomized trial with one-year follow-up. J.Psychosom.Res., 74, (1) 31-40.
FUKUDA, K., STRAUS, S. E., HICKIE, I., SHARPE, M. C., DOBBINS, J. G. & KOMAROFF, A. (1994) The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann.Intern.Med., 121, (12) 953-959.
GARCIA-BORREGUERO, D., DALE, J. K., ROSENTHAL, N. E., CHIARA, A., O'FALLON, A., BARTKO, J. J. & STRAUS, S. E. (1998) Lack of seasonal variation of symptoms in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychiatry Res., 77, (2) 71-77.
GOERTZEL, B. N., PENNACHIN, C., DE SOUZA, C. L., GURBAXANI, B., MALONEY, E. M. & JONES, J. F. (2006) Combinations of single nucleotide polymorphisms in neuroendocrine effector and receptor genes predict chronic fatigue syndrome. Pharmacogenomics., 7, (3) 475-483.
GOTTS, Z. M., ELLIS, J. G., DEARY, V., BARCLAY, N. & NEWTON, J. L. (2015) The association between daytime napping and cognitive functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome. PLoS.One., 10, (1) e0117136.
HARVEY, S. B. & WESSELY, S. (2009) Chronic fatigue syndrome: identifying zebras amongst the horses. BMC.Med., 7, 58.
HEIM, C., NATER, U. M., MALONEY, E., BONEVA, R., JONES, J. F. & REEVES, W. C. (2009) Childhood trauma and risk for chronic fatigue syndrome: association with neuroendocrine dysfunction. Arch.Gen.Psychiatry, 66, (1) 72-80.
Page 19 of 25
HEIM, C., WAGNER, D., MALONEY, E., PAPANICOLAOU, D. A., SOLOMON, L., JONES, J. F., UNGER, E. R. & REEVES, W. C. (2006) Early adverse experience and risk for chronic fatigue syndrome: results from a population-based study. Arch.Gen.Psychiatry, 63, (11) 1258-1266.
HEINS, M. J., KNOOP, H., LOBBESTAEL, J. & BLEIJENBERG, G. (2011) Childhood maltreatment and the response to cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. J.Psychosom.Res., 71, (6) 404-410.
HOLMES, G. P., KAPLAN, J. E., GANTZ, N. M., KOMAROFF, A. L., SCHONBERGER, L. B., STRAUS, S. E., JONES, J. F., DUBOIS, R. E., CUNNINGHAM-RUNDLES, C., PAHWA, S. & . (1988) Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition. Ann.Intern.Med., 108, (3) 387-389.
JACKSON, M. L. & BRUCK, D. (2012) Sleep abnormalities in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: a review. J.Clin.Sleep Med., 8, (6) 719-728.
JASON, L. A., BROWN, A., EVANS, M., SUNNQUIST, M. & NEWTON, J. L. (2013) Contrasting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome versus Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Fatigue., 1, (3) 168-183.
JASON, L. A., PLIOPLYS, A. V., TORRES-HARDING, S. & CORRADI, K. (2003) Comparing symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome in a community-based versus tertiary care sample. J Health Psychol., 8, (4) 459-464.
JASON, L. A., RICHMAN, J. A., RADEMAKER, A. W., JORDAN, K. M., PLIOPLYS, A. V., TAYLOR, R. R., MCCREADY, W., HUANG, C. F. & PLIOPLYS, S. (1999) A community-based study of chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch.Intern.Med., 159, (18) 2129-2137.
JOHNSTON, S. C., BRENU, E. W., HARDCASTLE, S. L., HUTH, T. K., STAINES, D. R. & MARSHALL-GRADISNIK, S. M. (2014) A comparison of health status in patients meeting alternative definitions for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. Health Qual.Life Outcomes., 12, 64.
KAWAKAMI, N., IWATA, N., FUJIHARA, S. & KITAMURA, T. (1998) Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in a community population in Japan. Tohoku J.Exp.Med., 186, (1) 33-41.
KELLER, B. A., PRYOR, J. L. & GILOTEAUX, L. (2014) Inability of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients to reproduce VO(2)peak indicates functional impairment. J.Transl.Med., 12, 104.
KEMPKE, S., LUYTEN, P., CLAES, S., GOOSSENS, L., BEKAERT, P., VAN, W. P. & VAN, H. B. (2013) Self-critical perfectionism and its relationship to fatigue and pain in the daily flow of life in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychol.Med., 43, (5) 995-1002.
KILSHAW S (2004) Gulf war syndrome. 3 ed.
KIM, C. H., SHIN, H. C. & WON, C. W. (2005) Prevalence of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in Korea: community-based primary care study. J.Korean Med.Sci., 20, (4) 529-534.
KOCH, H., VAN BOKHOVEN, M. A., TER, R. G., VAN ALPHEN-JAGER, J. T., VAN DER WEIJDEN, T., DINANT, G. J. & BINDELS, P. J. (2009) Ordering blood tests for patients with unexplained fatigue in general practice: what does it yield? Results of the VAMPIRE trial. Br.J.Gen.Pract., 59, (561) e93-100.
Page 20 of 25
KOELLE, D. M., BARCY, S., HUANG, M. L., ASHLEY, R. L., COREY, L., ZEH, J., ASHTON, S. & BUCHWALD, D. (2002) Markers of viral infection in monozygotic twins discordant for chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin.Infect.Dis., 35, (5) 518-525.
KREIJKAMP-KASPERS, S., BRENU, E. W., MARSHALL, S., STAINES, D. & VAN DRIEL, M. L. (2011) Treating chronic fatigue syndrome - a study into the scientific evidence for pharmacological treatments. Aust.Fam.Physician, 40, (11) 907-912.
LANE, T. J., MATTHEWS, D. A. & MANU, P. (1990) The low yield of physical examinations and laboratory investigations of patients with chronic fatigue. Am.J.Med.Sci., 299, (5) 313-318.
LANGE, G., DELUCA, J., MALDJIAN, J. A., LEE, H., TIERSKY, L. A. & NATELSON, B. H. (1999) Brain MRI abnormalities exist in a subset of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J.Neurol.Sci., 171, (1) 3-7.
LIBMAN, E., CRETI, L., BALTZAN, M., RIZZO, D., FICHTEN, C. S. & BAILES, S. (2009) Sleep apnea and psychological functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome. J.Health Psychol., 14, (8) 1251-1267.
LIGHT, A. R., BATEMAN, L., JO, D., HUGHEN, R. W., VANHAITSMA, T. A., WHITE, A. T. & LIGHT, K. C. (2012) Gene expression alterations at baseline and following moderate exercise in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia Syndrome. J.Intern.Med., 271, (1) 64-81.
LIN, J. M., RESCH, S. C., BRIMMER, D. J., JOHNSON, A., KENNEDY, S., BURSTEIN, N. & SIMON, C. J. (2011) The economic impact of chronic fatigue syndrome in Georgia: direct and indirect costs. Cost.Eff.Resour.Alloc., 9, (1) 1.
LLOYD, A. R., HICKIE, I., BOUGHTON, C. R., SPENCER, O. & WAKEFIELD, D. (1990) Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in an Australian population. Med.J.Aust., 153, (9) 522-528.
LO, S. C., PRIPUZOVA, N., LI, B., KOMAROFF, A. L., HUNG, G. C., WANG, R. & ALTER, H. J. (2010) Detection of MLV-related virus gene sequences in blood of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy blood donors. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A, 107, (36) 15874-15879.
LOMBARDI, V. C., RUSCETTI, F. W., DAS, G. J., PFOST, M. A., HAGEN, K. S., PETERSON, D. L., RUSCETTI, S. K., BAGNI, R. K., PETROW-SADOWSKI, C., GOLD, B., DEAN, M., SILVERMAN, R. H. & MIKOVITS, J. A. (2009) Detection of an infectious retrovirus, XMRV, in blood cells of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Science, 326, (5952) 585-589.
MARIMAN, A., DELESIE, L., TOBBACK, E., HANOULLE, I., SERMIJN, E., VERMEIR, P., PEVERNAGIE, D. & VOGELAERS, D. (2013a) Undiagnosed and comorbid disorders in patients with presumed chronic fatigue syndrome. J.Psychosom.Res., 75, (5) 491-496.
MARIMAN, A. N., VOGELAERS, D. P., TOBBACK, E., DELESIE, L. M., HANOULLE, I. P. & PEVERNAGIE, D. A. (2013b) Sleep in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Sleep Med.Rev., 17, (3) 193-199.
MCCRONE, P., DARBISHIRE, L., RIDSDALE, L. & SEED, P. (2003) The economic cost of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in UK primary care. Psychol.Med., 33, (2) 253-261.
NACUL, L. C., LACERDA, E. M., PHEBY, D., CAMPION, P., MOLOKHIA, M., FAYYAZ, S., LEITE, J. C., POLAND, F., HOWE, A. & DRACHLER, M. L. (2011) Prevalence of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) in three regions of England: a repeated cross-sectional study in primary care. BMC.Med., 9, 91.
Page 21 of 25
NATELSON, B. H., HAGHIGHI, M. H. & PONZIO, N. M. (2002) Evidence for the presence of immune dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin.Diagn.Lab Immunol., 9, (4) 747-752.
NJOKU, M. G., JASON, L. A. & TORRES-HARDING, S. R. (2007) The prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in Nigeria. J.Health Psychol., 12, (3) 461-474.
OKA, T., TANAHASHI, T., CHIJIWA, T., LKHAGVASUREN, B., SUDO, N. & OKA, K. (2014) Isometric yoga improves the fatigue and pain of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome who are resistant to conventional therapy: a randomized, controlled trial. Biopsychosoc.Med., 8, (1) 27.
PARISH, J. G. (1978) Early outbreaks of 'epidemic neuromyasthenia'. Postgrad.Med.J., 54, (637) 711-717.
POWELL, D. J., LIOSSI, C., MOSS-MORRIS, R. & SCHLOTZ, W. (2013) Unstimulated cortisol secretory activity in everyday life and its relationship with fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: A systematic review and subset meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, (11) 2405-2422.
PRINS, J. B., BLEIJENBERG, G., BAZELMANS, E., ELVING, L. D., DE BOO, T. M., SEVERENS, J. L., VAN DER WILT, G. J., SPINHOVEN, P. & VAN DER MEER, J. W. (2001) Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 357, (9259) 841-847.
RASA, S., NORA-KRUKLE, Z., CHAPENKO, S., KRUMINA, A., ROGA, S. & MUROVSKA, M. (2014) No evidence of XMRV provirus sequences in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and individuals with unspecified encephalopathy. New Microbiol., 37, (1) 17-24.
REEVES, W. C., JONES, J. F., MALONEY, E., HEIM, C., HOAGLIN, D. C., BONEVA, R. S., MORRISSEY, M. & DEVLIN, R. (2007) Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in metropolitan, urban, and rural Georgia. Popul.Health Metr., 5, 5.
REYNOLDS, K. J., VERNON, S. D., BOUCHERY, E. & REEVES, W. C. (2004) The economic impact of chronic fatigue syndrome. Cost.Eff.Resour.Alloc., 2, (1) 4.
SABES-FIGUERA, R., MCCRONE, P., HURLEY, M., KING, M., DONALDSON, A. N. & RIDSDALE, L. (2010) The hidden cost of chronic fatigue to patients and their families. BMC.Health Serv.Res., 10, 56.
SHARPE, M. (2002) The report of the Chief Medical Officer's CFS/ME working group: what does it say and will it help? Clin.Med., 2, (5) 427-429.
SHARPE, M. C., ARCHARD, L. C., BANATVALA, J. E., BORYSIEWICZ, L. K., CLARE, A. W., DAVID, A., EDWARDS, R. H., HAWTON, K. E., LAMBERT, H. P., LANE, R. J. & . (1991) A report--chronic fatigue syndrome: guidelines for research. J.R.Soc.Med., 84, (2) 118-121.
SIMMONS, G., GLYNN, S. A., KOMAROFF, A. L., MIKOVITS, J. A., TOBLER, L. H., HACKETT, J., JR., TANG, N., SWITZER, W. M., HENEINE, W., HEWLETT, I. K., ZHAO, J., LO, S. C., ALTER, H. J., LINNEN, J. M., GAO, K., COFFIN, J. M., KEARNEY, M. F., RUSCETTI, F. W., PFOST, M. A., BETHEL, J., KLEINMAN, S., HOLMBERG, J. A. & BUSCH, M. P. (2011) Failure to confirm XMRV/MLVs in the blood of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a multi-laboratory study. Science, 334, (6057) 814-817.
SMITH, A. K., DIMULESCU, I., FALKENBERG, V. R., NARASIMHAN, S., HEIM, C., VERNON, S. D. & RAJEEVAN, M. S. (2008) Genetic evaluation of the serotonergic system in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33, (2) 188-197.
Page 22 of 25
SNELL, C. R., STEVENS, S. R., DAVENPORT, T. E. & VAN NESS, J. M. (2013) Discriminative validity of metabolic and workload measurements for identifying people with chronic fatigue syndrome. Phys.Ther., 93, (11) 1484-1492.
STEELE, L., DOBBINS, J. G., FUKUDA, K., REYES, M., RANDALL, B., KOPPELMAN, M. & REEVES, W. C. (1998) The epidemiology of chronic fatigue in San Francisco. Am.J.Med., 105, (3A) 83S-90S.
STORDEUR S, THIRY N & EYSSEN M (2013) Chronisch vermoeidheidssyndroom: diagnose, behandeling en zorgorganisatie. Health Services Research (HSR). Brussel: Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg (KCE); 2008. KCE reports 88A (D/2008/10.273/58).
STRAUS, S. E., TOSATO, G., ARMSTRONG, G., LAWLEY, T., PREBLE, O. T., HENLE, W., DAVEY, R., PEARSON, G., EPSTEIN, J., BRUS, I. & . (1985) Persisting illness and fatigue in adults with evidence of Epstein-Barr virus infection. Ann.Intern.Med., 102, (1) 7-16.
VERCOULEN, J. H., BAZELMANS, E., SWANINK, C. M., FENNIS, J. F., GALAMA, J. M., JONGEN, P. J., HOMMES, O., VAN DER MEER, J. W. & BLEIJENBERG, G. (1997) Physical activity in chronic fatigue syndrome: assessment and its role in fatigue. J.Psychiatr.Res., 31, (6) 661-673.
VERSPAANDONK, J., COENDERS, M., BLEIJENBERG, G., LOBBESTAEL, J. & KNOOP, H. (2015) The role of the partner and relationship satisfaction on treatment outcome in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychol.Med. 1-8.
WALLMAN, K. E., MORTON, A. R., GOODMAN, C. & GROVE, R. (2005) Reliability of physiological, psychological, and cognitive variables in chronic fatigue syndrome. Res.Sports Med., 13, (3) 231-241.
WHITE, P. D., GOLDSMITH, K. A., JOHNSON, A. L., POTTS, L., WALWYN, R., DECESARE, J. C., BABER, H. L., BURGESS, M., CLARK, L. V., COX, D. L., BAVINTON, J., ANGUS, B. J., MURPHY, G., MURPHY, M., O'DOWD, H., WILKS, D., MCCRONE, P., CHALDER, T. & SHARPE, M. (2011) Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial. Lancet, 377, (9768) 823-836.
YIU, Y. M. & QIU, M. Y. (2005) [A preliminary epidemiological study and discussion on traditional Chinese medicine pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome in Hong Kong]. Zhong.Xi.Yi.Jie.He.Xue.Bao., 3, (5) 359-362.
YOSHIUCHI, K., FARKAS, J. & NATELSON, B. H. (2006) Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome have reduced absolute cortical blood flow. Clin.Physiol Funct.Imaging, 26, (2) 83-86.
Page 23 of 25
Bewijs van publicatie
Page 24 of 25
Nederlandse samenvatting
Chronic fatigue syndrome – an update Steven Rimbaut, Céline Van Gutte, Lina Van Brabander, Luc Vanden Bossche
Het chronisch vermoeidheidssyndroom (CVS) is een wijdverspreide aandoening met een grote
impact zowel op het dagelijks leven van de patiënt als op de maatschappij. Dit wordt gekenmerkt
door een significant verlies aan productiviteit, hoge informele kosten en hoge medische uitgaven.
De hoge prevalentie (0.2%-6.4%) en de lage tewerkstellingsgraad (27-41%) zijn verantwoordelijk voor
de grote impact op de maatschappij, waarbij het verlies aan productiviteit de grootste kost
vertegenwoordigt.
Deze review brengt een systematisch literatuuroverzicht van de beschikbare, recente literatuur over
chronisch vermoeidheidssyndroom/myalgische encefalitis.
De gepubliceerde literatuur tussen 1 januari 1990 en 1 april 2015 werd gescreend naar relevante
artikels. Hierbij werd gebruik gemaakt van volgende databases: medline, cochrane library en web of
sciences. Daarnaast werden de referentielijsten van de geselecteerde artikels gescreend voor
overige, relevante artikels.
Verscheidene diagnostische criteria werden geopperd. Tot op heden zijn de meest gangbare, de
Fukuda-criteria (gepubliceerd in 1994):
Er is reeds uitgebreid onderzoek uitgevoerd naar de etiologie van CVS. Volgende hypothesen zijn
reeds uitgebreid geïnvestigeerd: infectieuze oorzaak, immuundysfunctie, slaapstoornis, endocriene-
metabole dysfunctie en neuropsychiatrische aandoeningen. Ondanks uitgebreid onderzoek, kon geen
enkel van de vooropgestelde etiologische factoren weerhouden worden. Er is tot op heden geen
sterk, reproduceerbaar bewijs geleverd.
De laatste jaren heeft het biopsychosociaal model aan populariteit gewonnen ten koste van het
biomedisch model waarbij de focus enkel ligt op fysische oorzaken. In het biopsychosociaal model
worden veel van de vooropgestelde hypothesen geïntegreerd.
Page 25 of 25
Aangezien de etiologie tot op heden niet ontrafeld is, is een eenduidige evidence-based behandeling
niet voorhanden. Enkel cognitieve gedragstherapie en graduele oefentherapie toonden een matige
effectiviteit aan.