ciam subcommittee f2
DESCRIPTION
CIAM Subcommittee F2. Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade F2B Judging Workshop. F2B Work Group. JUDGE TRAINING Common Language for Errors Representation Presented by Massimo Semoli, CIAM Secretary/Delegate, Italy. The Objectives that we need to achieve with the training of judges are: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CIAM Subcommittee F2
F2B Work Group
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
F2B Judging Workshop
JUDGE TRAININGCommon Language
for Errors Representation
Presented by Massimo Semoli, CIAM Secretary/Delegate, Italy
2
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
• The Objectives that we need to achieve with the training of judges are:– To inform and educate the judges– For all the judges to have the same interpretation– To uplift the standard of judging– To ensure fair results
• We need a feed back from the judgesUntil we don’t establish a way for understanding how a judge evaluates the errors and interprets a manoeuvre, we will not be able to meet completely the above objectives.
• A connection between the score and the errors seenOnly during the training sessions of the judges a common language could be established in order to understand which errors have been seen in relation to the assigned score for each manoeuvre.
3
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
• The common language The common language should be quickly to write and easily to understand.It should be a compromise between a sort of stenography and self-explanatory language.
• Time available between the manoeuvresThe time available is not much but with good practice and establishing simple rules, a common language can be effectiveness used.
• Advantage of useThe use of the common language it is also useful for improving the concentration on the manoeuvre evaluation. More important for beginner judges during the training sessions.
• Proposed languageThe proposed language is based on indications and sketches and, during the years, showed to be used for training judging sessions during the normal flight evaluation.
4
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
• The rules of use For each manoeuvre:– Amplify the errors with the sketches– Identify or show only the main errors; they could be major and/or minor– Don’t try to show all the errors; only two, maximum three– Don’t represent detailed segmented path; it not possible to represent it
properly– Focus on the major errors first and minor errors after– The weight of the error(s) represented is identified by the assigned
score:• If High score - minor errors are represented• If Low score – major errors are represented
• ResultsThe above rules seem to limit the effectiveness of the approach, but with a proper use of the language the results are surprisingly positive. Try !!!!
• Personal adjustmentAny judge can include preferred and personal adjustment to this language, also based on his experience. It is only important that it remains: simple, quick to write, effectiveness and easy to understand.
5
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
The Common Language
6
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
Meaning of the general indications
> 45 greater than 45 degrees
>> 45 much greater than 45 degrees
< 45 less than 45 degrees
> 90 greater than 90 degrees
>> 90 much greater than 90 degrees
> 1.8 higher than 1.8 meters
>> 1.8 much higher than 1.8 meters
< 1.2 lower than 1.2 meters
> 1 more than 1 lap
< 1 less than 1 lap
<< 1 much less than 1 lap
7
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
Take-Off manoeuvre
Abrupttrajectorychange
Reverse wing-over manoeuvre
Two verticalclimbs/divesnot coincident
Roundedturns
climbs/divesnot vertical
Wobblesjerks
8
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
Three consecutive inside loops manoeuvre
Two consecutive laps of inverted level flight manoeuvre
Differentposition
Wobblesjerks
9
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
Three consecutive outside loops manoeuvre
Two consecutive inside square loops manoeuvre
Roundedturns
Differentposition
10
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
Two consecutive outside square loops manoeuvre
Two consecutive inside triangular loops manoeuvre
Roundedturns
Roundedturns
Steep Flat Differentposition
Roundedturn
11
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
Two consecutive horizontal eight manoeuvre (each)
Two consecutive horizontal square eight manoeuvre (each)
12
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
Two consecutive vertical eight manoeuvre (each)
Hourglass manoeuvre
Flat Steep
13
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
Two consecutive overhead eight manoeuvre (each)( top view )
Four-leaf clover manoeuvre
14
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
Landing manoeuvre
Abrupttrajectorychange
Wobblesjerks
15
CIAM Subcommittee F2F2B Work Group
F2B Judging WorkshopJudge Training – Common Language
Eurochamps F2, July 2007, Belgrade
JUDGE TRAININGCommon Language
ForErrors Representation
Thank you !
Presented by Massimo Semoli, CIAM Secretary/Delegate, Italy