cimmse tc wind group conference call wednesday, april 10 th, 2013 11 am

13
CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th , 2013 11 AM

Upload: annabelle-parks

Post on 17-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM

CIMMSE TC Wind GroupConference Call

Wednesday, April 10th, 201311 AM

Page 2: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM

Agenda

• Holland et al. (2010) Error Function Update• Modified Rankine Vortex Error Function

Page 3: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM

3

Holland et al. Error Analysis

• Goal: potential hybrid approach to improved interpolation method

• Minimize error method

• Hypothesis we are testing:-There are systematic interpolation errors over the 219 available analysis

times as a function of distance from storm center-Develop error function E(q,r) to model these errors to improve the

Holland et al. interpolation method

Page 4: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM

4

Holland et al. Error Analysis: Method

• Minimize error method– Use all 219 storm analysis times

do ts = 1->num_available_analysis_times do i = quadrant 1->4 //calculate average hwind analyzed wind speed at the

various distances from storm center (1)

//calculate Holland et al interpolated wind speed at the various distances from storm center (2)

//take difference of (1) and (2) to provide estimate of

quadrant error for the analysis time based on distance from storm center (where data available for both)

end doend do

Page 5: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM

5

Holland et al. Error Analysis

• For each quadrant and analysis time we then:– Calculate average error, binning each 5 km

distances from storm center– Normalize error relative to best track maximum

sustained winds provided by NHC for the analysis time

• Result: four plots (one for each quadrant), normalized error vs. distance from storm center

Page 6: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM
Page 7: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM
Page 8: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM

8

Holland et al. (2010) Update

• Can create improved Holland Interpolated Wind Field:

Holland_Improved(q, d) = Holland Interp(q, d) - Normalized Interp Error Function (q, d) * Max Wind

Page 9: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM
Page 10: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM
Page 11: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM

Summary: Advantages/Disadvantages

• Holland et al. Error Function: – Advantage• Pretty direct relationship of error as function of

distance

– Disadvantages• Holland et al. would need to be coded into

TCMWindTool• Holland et al. initial plots do not show improvement

over modified Rankine

Page 12: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM

Summary: Advantages/Disadvantages

• Modified Rankine Error Function: – Advantages• Already coded into TCMWindTool• Shown to perform better than Holland et al. model

– Disadvantages• When looking at all storms as a function of distance,

error not as direct function with distance– Larger spread in error as function of radius among different

times/storms– Likely attributable to dependence on 34, 50, and 64 knot

maximum wind radii

Page 13: CIMMSE TC Wind Group Conference Call Wednesday, April 10 th, 2013 11 AM

Discussion

Next Conference Call: Wednesday, May 8th, 2013