citizens advisory committee

December 10, 2009Dr. Allan Markley

PurposeThe CAC mission is to serve as an avenue of

two-way communication with the C-2 Board of Education and the community, to be an active partner with and to advise the C-2 School District and to achieve the most successful school system possible.

Task At HandC-2 Mission and Vision StatementRQS Mission Statement: As a diverse, caring

community, we will ensure all students the opportunity to develop a foundation that empowers them to create their future.

QuestionsDoes the current mission statement address the

current trends of data?Does the current mission statement define the

direction of the school districts purpose for its students?

ProcessReview

The Now Current Mission Statement

Supporting Data of That Time Period Academic Demographics Community Educational Trends

Academic DataAnnual Performance Report (APR)

MAP Index DataACT Advanced CoursesCareer Education CoursesCollege PlacementCareer Education PlacementGraduation RateAttendance RateAdequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

2009 District Summary of Annual Performance Report (APR)4th Cycle

{ Back to: School List | Summary | Data }

District Name: RAYTOWN C-2 County/District Code: 048073

Total Points Earned

GRADE SPAN GRADE LEVEL GRADE SPAN GRADE LEVEL

MSIP Standard/Indi

cator

Status Points

Progress

Points

Status Points

Progress

PointsStatus

Progress

StatusProgre

ssGap

Bonus

Status +

Progress

Points Requir

ed

Met/Not Met

9.1*1 MAP Grades 3-5 Mathematics

Avg =12

A=4 RA=4 3/2=0 @

Avg =24

A=0 RA=0 2/2=0

@

12 4 24 0 Y

Status Total=

36 Status

& ProgressTotal=40

40 Status

50 Status

+ Progress 40 Status

+ Progre

ss + Bonus

=Y

Met

9.1*2 MAP Grades 3-5 Communication Arts

Avg =12

A=12 RA=4 3/2=0

Avg =24

A=8 RA=0 2/2=0

@

12 12 24 8

Status Total=

36 Status

& ProgressTotal=56

40 Status

50 Status


+ Progre

ss + Bonus

=Y

Met

9.1*3 MAP Grades 6-8 Mathematics

H2 =16

A=4 RA=4 3/2=0

Avg =24

A=8 RA=8 2/2=0

16 4 24 8 Y

Status Total=

40 Status

& ProgressTotal=52

40 Status

50 Status


+ Progre

ss + Bonus

=Y

Met

9.1*4 MAP Grades 6-8 Communication Arts

Avg =12

A=0 RA=0 3/2=0 @

Avg =24

A=8 RA=8 2/2=8

12 0 24 8

Status Total=

36 Status

& ProgressTotal=44

40 Status

50 Status


+ Progre

ss + Bonus

=Y

Not Met

Total Points Earned

GRADE SPANGRADE LEVEL

EOC GRADE SPANGRADE LEVEL

EOC

MSIP Standard/Indi

cator

Status Points

Progress

Points

Status Points

Progress

Points**

Status Points

Progress

Points***

StatusProgre

ssStatus

Progress**

StatusProgress***

Status +

Progress

Points Requir

ed

Met/Not Met

9.1*5 EOC Algebra I Mathematics

H2 =10

A=4 RA=2 3/2=0

Avg =22

A=12 RA=0

BA =8 10 4 22 12 8

Status Total=

40 Status

& Progre

ss Total=

56

40 Status

50 Status

+ Progre

ss

Met

9.1*6 EOC English II Communication Arts

H2 =10

A=4 RA=0 3/2=0 @

Avg =22

A=12 RA=0

BA =8 10 4 22 12 8

Status Total=

40 Status

& Progre

ss Total=

56

40 Status

50 Status

+ Progre

ss

Met

BONUS MAP ACHIEVEMENT

Not Met

SCIENCE BONUS POINTS

MSIP Standard/Indicator Status Points Total Points Earned Average

Average

Points Req

Met/Not Met

BONUS POINTS Grade 3-5 Science BA = 2 2

BONUS POINTS Grade 6-8 Science BA = 2 2

BONUS POINTS Biology I Science Avg = 3 3

TOTAL POINTS 7 2.3 3.3Not Met

Total Points EarnedPoints

Required (Minimum)

MSIP Standard/Indicator Status PointsProgress Points

Status Progress

Status +

Progress

Status +

Progress

Met/Not Met

9.3 ACT BA =2 A=2 RA=0 3/2= 0 @

2 2 4 4 Met

9.4*1 Advanced Courses H2 =4 Combined=4

A=2 RA=3 3/2=2

4 3 7 4 Met

9.4*2 Career Education Courses Avg =3 Combined=4

A=2 RA=2 3/2=2

4 2 6 4 Met

9.4*3 College Placement H2 =4 Combined=0

A=2 RA=1 3/2=0 @

4 2 6 4 Met

9.4*4 Career Education Placement Avg =3 Combined=0

A=2 RA=3 3/2=2

3 3 6 4 Met

9.5 Graduation Rate BA =2 A=2 RA=3 3/2=0

2 3 5 4 Met

9.6 Attendance Rate Avg =3 A=0 RA=0 3/2=0

3 0 3 4 Not Met

9.7 Subgroup Achievement F =0 0 NA 0 4 Not Met

Total Standards Met 11 Performance Accreditation Rating

2002-2008 APR’s

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

82 73 64 82 11 11 12 11

Map Index DataMissouri Assessment ProgramGRADE SPAN 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 STATUS LND

9.1*1 Grades 3-5 Mathematics 213.0 205.6 199.6 201.1 207.4 205.3

9.1*2 Grades 3-5 Communication Arts 190.7 193.6 190.5 192.7 195.2 192.5





Missouri Assessment ProgramGRADE LEVEL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 STATUS LND

9.1*1 Grades 3-5 Mathematics 742.4 744.7 734.6 735.8 739.4

9.1*2 Grades 3-5 Communication Arts 742.7 746.9 737.9 735.8 740.8

9.1*3 Grades 6-8 Mathematics 735.6 730.1 735.6 737.4 734.7

9.1*4 Grades 6-8 Communication Arts 737.0 738.4 744.8 742.7 740.7

9.1*5 Grades 9-11 Mathematics 720.9 720.8 726.4 722.7

9.1*6 Grades 9-11 Communication Arts 732.0 744.1 730.0 735.4

Missouri Assessment ProgramEND-OF-COURSE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 STATUS LND

9.1*5 Algebra I Mathematics 730.8 730.8

9.1*6 English IICommunication Arts 760.5 760.5

MAP Index DataMissouri Assessment ProgramBONUS ACHIEVEMENT

2008 2009

Number of MAP Standards Evaluated

6 6

Number Demonstrating Improvement

X 2

Percent of MAP Standards Evaluated

33.3 %

Missouri Assessment ProgramGAP BONUS

2008 2009Improveme

nt

9.1*1 Grades 3-5 MathematicsDistrict Minority

716.3 719.0 2.7

State Majority 757.6 758.7 1.1 District Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 716.0 718.8 2.8 State Non Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 767.2 770.2 3.0 9.1*2 Grades 3-5 Communication ArtsDistrict Minority

721.2 721.4 0.2

State Majority 761.6 762.6 0.9 District Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 717.8 717.4 -0.4 State Non Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 773.1 775.8 2.7 9.1*3 Grades 6-8 MathematicsDistrict Minority

711.9 720.6 8.7

State Majority 761.3 764.4 3.1 District Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 715.2 717.9 2.7 State Non Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 770.7 776.5 5.8 9.1*4 Grades 6-8 Communication ArtsDistrict Minority

727.0 728.4 1.4

State Majority 764.7 767.0 2.3 District Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 726.0 725.9 -0.1 State Non Free or Reduce Priced Lunch 774.5 779.3 4.8 9.1*5 Algebra I MathematicsGAP Bonus will not be available for the fourth year of Fourth Cycle9.1*6 English II Communication ArtsGAP Bonus will not be available for the fourth year of Fourth CycleBONUS POINTS Missouri Assessment Program Grade Level and End-of-Course

2008 2009 STATUS LND

Grades 3-5 Science 717.6 724.3 721.0 Grades 6-8 Science 705.6 715.1 710.4 BiologyScience 742.7 742.7

Index Data9.3 ACT 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUSNumber of Graduates

558 572 642 608 611

Number of Graduates Scoring at or Above the National Average on the ACT

141 161 154 160 142

Percent of Graduates Scoring at or Above the National Average on the ACT

25.3 28.1 24.0 26.3 23.2 25.4

9.4*1 Advanced Courses

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS

Units of Credit Times Enrollment in Approved Advanced Courses

3658.5 3617.5 4928.0 4734.5 5322.0

Grades 11-12 Enrollment Times Credits Possible

9,093 9,695 9,849 9,933 9,632

Percent of Credits Earned in Advanced Courses

40.2 37.3 50.0 47.7 55.3 46.1

9.4*2 Career Education Courses

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS

Units of Credit Times Enrollment in Approved Career Education Courses

1759.0 1672.5 2121.0 2080.0 2243.0

Grades 11-12 Enrollment Times Credits Possible

9,093 9,695 9,849 9,933 9,632

Percent of Credits Earned in Career Education Courses

19.3 17.3 21.5 20.9 23.3 20.5

Index Data9.4*1 Advanced and 9.4*2 Career Education Courses

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS

Units of Credit Times Enrollment in Approved Advanced & Career Education Courses

5417.5 5290.0 7049.0 6814.5 7565.0

Grades 11-12 Enrollment Times Credit Possible

9,093 9,695 9,849 9,933 9,632

Percent of Credits Earned in Advanced and Career Education Courses

59.6 54.6 71.6 68.6 78.5 66.6

9.4*3 College Placement

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 STATUS

Number of Graduates Entering College

419 455 241 509 448

Number of Graduates

524 558 572 642 608

Percent of Graduates Entering College

80.0 81.5 42.1 79.3 73.7 71.3

9.4*4 Career Education Placement

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 STATUS

Number of Graduates Completing a Career Education Program

259 226 259 385 372

Number of Graduates Completing a Career Education Program Placed in Occupations Relating to their Training, Attending College, or in the Military

196 159 203 282 342

Percent of Career Education Completers who are Placed

75.7 70.4 78.4 73.2 91.9 77.9

Index Data9.4*3 College Placement & 9.4*4 Career Education Placement

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 STATUS

Number of Graduates Entering College or Placed in an Occupation Related to their Career Education Training or the Military

482 502 298 585 497

Number of Graduates

524 558 572 642 608

Percent College and Career Education Placement

92.0 90.0 52.1 91.1 81.7 81.4

9.5 Graduation Rate

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS

Number of Graduates

558 572 642 608 611

Cohort Dropouts Plus Graduates

692 705 775 729 695

Graduation Rate 80.6 81.1 82.8 83.4 87.9 83.2 9.6 Attendance Rate

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 STATUS

Grades K-8 94.3 94.0 94.5 94.6 94.9 Grades 9-12 92.7 94.1 92.8 92.9 93.3 Grades K-12 93.8 94.1 94.0 94.1 94.4 94.1 * 9.7 Subgroup Achievement

2009 STATUS

Number of Accountable AYP Subgroups

16

Number of Accountable Subgroups meeting AYP

4

Percent of Subgroups meeting AYP

25.0 25.0

AYP DataMissouri Department of Elementary and Secondary EducationRAYTOWN C-2 (048073 )FINAL Adequate Yearly Progress**

2009 Groups* Met

Communication Arts 8 2

Mathematics 8 2

Required Action: District Improvement Level 3, Corrective Action

Overall Status2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Communication Arts Status Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Mathematics Status Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Attendance Rate Met Met Met Met

Graduation Rate Met Met Met Not Met

COMMUNICATION ARTS

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Annual Proficiency Target

18.4 19.4 20.4 26.6 34.7 42.9 51.0 59.2 67.4 75.5 83.7 91.8 100.0

School Total (All Kids)

PROF 29.6 * 26.6 *

Y

24.6 * Y

28.3 * Y

40.4 * Y

41.7 * CI

40.2 * NP

42.5 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

50.6 53.7

LND/PR 0.8 1.3 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 Asian/Pacific Isl.

PROF 35.7

--

56 --

51.5 * Y

64.2 * Y

52.9 * Y

56.4 * CI

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

55.7 62.8

LND/PR 0 0 0 0 0 0

Black PROF 15.4 * 15.8 *

N

13.1 * N

16.2 * NP

26.9 * NP

28.1 * NP

28.3 * NP

32.4 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

39.8 45.2

LND/PR 1.2 1.3 0.8 1.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1

Hispanic PROF 17.8 * 22.7 *

N*

15.7 * CI

24.7 * CI

32.4 * CI

29.8 * NP

36.6 * G

39.6 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

52.5 53.4

LND/PR 0 5.7 2.8 2.7 0.5 0.4 0 1 American Indian

PROF 25 28.6

--

0 --

16.7 --

42.9 --

42.1 --

52.6 --

50 --

White PROF 35.6 * 32 *

Y

31.3 * Y

35.6 * Y

50.9 * Y

54.1 * Y

50.9 * CI

52.3 * G

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

59.7 61.7

LND/PR 0.4 1 1.4 0.6 0.5 0 0.2 0.2 Other/Non-Response

PROF 0 0 --

42.9 --

66.7 --

0 --

13 --

. 0 --

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

. 0

LND/PR 42.9 0 22.2 0 20 0 . 100 F/R Lunch

PROF 17.2 * 16 *

N

13.8 * N

19.6 * NP

27.8 * NP

30.5 * NP

29 * NP

31.9 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

42.2 46.6

LND/PR 0.9 2.6 1.5 1.3 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2

IEP PROF 5.9 * 8.8 *

N

8.1 * N

9.9 * NP

17 * NP

18.8 * NP

17.3 * NP

19.7 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

34.4 37.3

LND/PR 0.5 2.7 3.6 1.7 2.3 0.2 0.6 0.4

LEP PROF 20 8.3

--

0 --

10.5 --

15.2 * SC

11.8 * NP

14 * NP

16 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

39.8 33.3

LND/PR 0 25 13.3 5 0 1.1 0 3.6

MATHEMATICS 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Annual Proficiency Target

8.3 9.3 10.3 17.5 26.6 35.8 45.0 54.1 63.3 72.5 81.7 90.8 100.0


PROF 19.4 * 16.4 *

Y

18.5 * Y

19.4 * Y

42.3 * Y

41.7 * Y

40.6 * G

40.1 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

48.5 49.4

LND/PR 0.6 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.3 0 0.2 0.1 Asian/Pacific Isl.

PROF 29.2

--

30.8 --

59.1 * Y

57.8 * Y

68.4 * Y

63.8 * Y

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

72.4 73.9

LND/PR 0 0 0 0 0 0

Black PROF 9.7 * 5.5 *

N

6.2 * N

8.5 * NP

26.5 * CI

26.5 * NP

26.6 * NP

28.2 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

36.1 39.1

LND/PR 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.3 0 0.3 0.1

Hispanic PROF 15.7 * 14.8 *

N*

19 * Y

13.8 * CI

38.3 * Y

30 * CI

36.9 * G

36.5 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

46.6 45.6

LND/PR 3.8 7.6 1.2 1.2 0 0 0.3 0 American Indian

PROF 22.2 12.5

--

0 --

25 --

47.8 --

45.5 --

50 --

30.8

White PROF 23.2 * 21.9 *

Y

25.4 * Y

26.4 * Y

54.4 * Y

55.3 * Y

53.7 * Y

52 * CI

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

59.7 59.9

LND/PR 0.5 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0 0.2 0.1

Other/Non-Response

PROF 0 0 --

40 --

0 --

0 --

6.3 --

. 0 --

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

. 0

LND/PR 16.7 0 0 0 0 0 . 100

F/R Lunch

PROF 11.6 * 10.3 *

Y

12.3 * Y

12.2 * NP

30 * Y

30.8 * NP

29.8 * NP

30.6 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

38.7 42.1

LND/PR 0.7 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.4 0 0.3 0

IEP PROF 5.9 * 4.7 *

N

7.5 * CI

11 * NP

23.4 * CI

22.3 * NP

23.1 * NP

26 * NP

LEP PROF 12.5 7.7

--

12.5 --

5.3 --

12.3 * SC

13.9 * NP

17.3 * NP

14.9 * NP

GROWTH +

PROF PCT

33.7 27.7

LND/PR 0 13.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ADDITIONAL INDICATOR--ATTENDANCE RATE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


94.3 *

Met

94 * Met

94.5 * Met

94.6 * Met

94.9 * Met

ADDITIONAL INDICATOR--GRADUATION RATE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

School Total (All Graduates)

80.5 * Met Y

81.1 * Met Y

82.7 * Met Y

83.5 * Met Y

78.1 * Not Met

Demographic DataEnrollment/Staff Data

Preschool EnrollmentK-12 EnrollmentFree/Reduced PercentagesDropout RateGraduate DestinationStaffing RatiosCertification Status of TeachersYears of Experience of Professional Staff

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Missouri 11,604 14,366 18,006 21,411 22,692

RAYTOWN C-2

166 173 121 173 128

Definition | More Data |

(2) Preschool Enrollment

Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Total 896,186 894,809 899,941 899,525 894,609

Asian 1.4% 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8%

Black 17.9% 17.9% 18.1% 18.1% 18.0%

Hispanic 2.5% 2.8% 3.1% 3.4% 3.6%

Indian 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4%

White 77.8% 77.4% 76.8% 76.4% 76.2%

RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Total 8,570 8,664 8,765 8,742 8,720

Asian 1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.9% 1.9%

Black 34.3% 36.9% 39.6% 41.1% 42.8%

Hispanic 4.3% 4.7% 5.3% 6.1% 6.7%

Indian 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4%

White 59.7% 56.4% 53.1% 50.4% 48.1%

(3) K-12 Enrollment

Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Percent 40.5% 41.7% 40.8% 41.8% 42.1%

Number 354,534 364,441 367,461 366,547 367,724

RAYTOWN C-2

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Percent 37.8% 39.7% 40.8% 43.9% 46.2%

Number 3,227 3,431 3,506 3,756 4,022

(5) Students Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch

Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Total 3.3 3.6 4.0 3.7 4.2

Asian 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.3

Black 5.0 5.8 7.4 6.6 9.0

Hispanic 5.1 4.8 5.8 7.0 6.9

Indian 3.5 4.9 6.1 4.5 3.7

White 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.1

RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Total 3.5 4.6 4.4 3.1 3.4

Asian 0.0 0.0 4.5 3.3 0.0

Black 2.7 4.5 4.6 2.6 3.5

Hispanic 4.3 1.6 2.4 2.1 5.9

Indian 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 11.4

White 4.0 5.1 4.3 3.7 3.1

(7) Dropout Rate

Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Entering a 4yr. College/University

38.6 38.2 39.4 39.4 39.9

Entering a 2yr. College

26.7 26.5 25.8 26.2 26.8

Entering a Postsecondary (Technical) Institution

4.1 4.4 4.3 4.0 3.5

RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Entering a 4yr. College/University

48.8 39.5 37.6 25.0 32.7

Entering a 2yr. College

34.6 31.9 39.4 15.0 45.0

Entering a Postsecondary (Technical) Institution

3.90 8.60 4.50 2.10 1.60

Definition | More Data |

(8) Where Our Graduates Go

Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Students to classroom teachers

19 19 18 18 18

Students to administrators

206 204 203 197 189

RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Students to classroom teachers

21 19 19 19 19

Students to administrators

192 198 204 188 187

(10) Staffing Ratios

Missouri 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Teachers with Regular Certificates

96.9% 97.4% 97.1% 97.0% 97.0%

Temporary or Special Assignment Certificates

1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 1.8%

Substitute, Expired or No Certificate

1.5% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% 1.2%

Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

95.3% 96.4% 96.7% 96.8% 96.4%

RAYTOWN C-2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Teachers with Regular Certificates

97.1% 96.6% 98.3% 98.1% 97.3%

Temporary or Special Assignment Certificates

0.9% 1.2% 0.9% 1.5% 2.2%

Substitute, Expired or No Certificate

2.0% 2.2% 0.9% 0.5% 0.5%

Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

94.8% 95.7% 98.1% 98.5% 98.6%

(11) Certification Status of Teachers

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Missouri 12.9 12.8 12.6 12.6 12.4

RAYTOWN C-2

12.3 11.2 10.5 9.5 9.1

(12) Years of Experience of Professional Staff

Demographic DataDemographic Data, 2005-2009

RAYTOWN C-2 MissouriYear 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Enrollment

8,664 8,765 8,742 8,720 8,622 894,809 899,941 900,781 895,833 892,279

Asian (Number|Percent)

1251.4

1301.5

1621.9

1701.9

1681.9

13,059 1.5

14,169 1.6

15,023 1.7

15,814 1.8

16,511 1.9

Black (Number|Percent)

3,19636.9

3,47239.6

3,59741.1

3,72842.8

3,88245.0

160,618 17.9

162,895 18.1

162,743 18.1

160,507 17.9

159,066 17.8

Hispanic (Number|Percent)

4114.7

4625.3

5346.1

5886.7

6257.2

25,166 2.8

27,935 3.1

30,464 3.4

32,500 3.6

33,994 3.8

Indian (Number|Percent)

460.5

460.5

450.5

390.4

320.4

3,444 0.4

3,640 0.4

3,739 0.4

3,913 0.4

3,952 0.4

White (Number|Percent)

4,88656.4

4,65553.1

4,40450.4

4,19548.1

3,91545.4

692,522 77.4

691,302 76.8

688,812 76.5

683,088 76.3

678,756 76.1

Free/Reduced Lunch (FTE)* (Number|Percent)

3,431.0039.7

3,506.0040.8

3,756.0043.9

4,022.0046.2

4,214.1049.4

364,441 41.7

367,462 40.8

366,547 41.8

367,720 42.1

380,376 43.7

ProcessReview

The Now Current Mission Statement

Supporting Board Goals Building Goals Academic Demographics Community Educational Trends (Current Research)

Where Were We?Mission Statement

RQS Mission Statement: As a diverse, caring community, we will ensure all students the opportunity to develop a foundation that empowers them to create their future.




Raytown Quality SchoolsMSIP Accreditation as of July 2009 RAYTOWN C-2 school district is: Accredited

Number of Missouri Districts Accredited 512 (97.9%) Provisionally 8 ( 1.5%) Interim 1 ( 0.2%) Unaccredited 2 ( 0.4%) Source: Missouri Dept. of Elementary and

Secondary Education Core Data As Submitted by Missouri Public Schools

Table Updated July 6, 2009

Tonight’s AgendaGroup Data Review

Number 1-7Handouts

Does the current mission statement address the academic needs of our students?

Group DiscussionCommittee DebriefNext Meeting, February 18, 2010 6:00 p.m.

Raytown Demographics

I Have Changed My MindImagine That!Debriefing

Homework AssignmentGroup Reporter Provide Group Answers To Me

Via E-Mail, I Will Distribute To [email protected]

Where Were We?Mission Statement

RQS Mission Statement: As a diverse, caring community, we will ensure all students the opportunity to develop a foundation that empowers them to create their future.




Tonight’s AgendaGroup Data Review

Group DiscussionCommittee Debrief

Raytown DemographicsNext Meeting

March 25, 2010, 6:00 p.m.

Raytown1990-2000See Handouts

What is Obvious?How Does the Current Mission Statement

Connect With the Data?

Raytown School Data 2005-2009

See HandoutWhat Are the Correlations With the Prior Data?Can we Connect our Current Mission

Statement?

Mission StatementGroups

Task Using Given Data, Each Group Will Write a New

Mission Statement for the District If Necessary, Write a Vision Statement That

Supports Your Mission StatementCompare Statements

Recommendation to the Board of Education

DATADemographic Trends

EthnicitySpecial EducationSocioeconomicDiscussion

Decision TimeGroup Work

Number 1-4Write a Mission Statement Based on Prior Data

If Necessary, Write 1-2 Vision Statements in Support

Compare Group Work Look for Commonalities

Final ProductRecommendation To Board Of Education

April 26, 2010

citizens advisory committee

Documents

status progress total

status progresstotal

status progress bonus

status progressmet

y status total

total points earnedpoints

bonus points biology

total points7