city council candidate questionnaire michael v johnson - d6

Download City council candidate questionnaire   Michael V Johnson - D6

Post on 18-Dec-2014

270 views

Category:

News & Politics

2 download

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Oakland City council candidate questionnaire 2014

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1. 1 City Council Candidate Questionnaire Candidate: Michael V. Johnson District: 6 Note: Please limit your answers to 250 words except where the question indicates a different word limit. 1. Please state your position on the following November ballot measures along with a brief (No more than 30 word) statement supporting your position. Measure Z: Public Safety (Parcel tax for police, fire and violence prevention programs) I support Measure Z. The City of Oakland should do everything it can to reduce gun violence, robberies, and homicides, improve 9-1-1 response times and support at-risk youth/young adults. Measure XX: Public Ethics (Restructuring of Public Ethics Commission and mandatory funding for its staff) I whole-heartedly support Measure XX. The Public Ethics Commission should be given greater independence, broader enforcement authority, powers and responsibilities, and staff to enforce compliance with ethics-related laws and requirements. Measure XX: Redistricting (Redistricting commission for City Council boundaries) I support the measure to amend the City Charter to transfer authority to redraw the district boundary lines for City Council and OUSD to a 13-member independent redistricting commission. 2. MOBN!s public safety plan calls for increasing Oaklands police force to 900 sworn officers within four years. To reach this goal, MOBN! advocates that the city should: 1) not layoff any Oakland police officers under any circumstances; 2) schedule, fund, and conduct sufficient police academies each year to increase that number, not simply replace officers who retire or otherwise leave the force; and 3) make increasing the size of the police department its number one priority. Do you agree or disagree? I AGREE that we need to increase Oakland's police force to within four years. It is my position that the total number of sworn officers is the wrong number to focus on. The number that we should be focused on is the number of sworn officers that have been assigned to patrol the streets of Oakland. Here is why I have taken that position. As of May 31, 2014 sworn staffing level were at historically low levels of only 649 officers. While the budgeted strength of the OPD is 707 as of October 2014, 58 positions remain unfilled. Of the 649 positions that are filled, only 224 officers have been assigned to patrol the streets of Oakland. It is my intent to fully implement community policing in the city of Oakland, and to do that you need feet on the street in our neighborhoods in order to make community policing work effectively. So while the total number of officers is an interesting number to know, that number, is only secondary to the number of officers assigned to patrol our neighborhood. That number should be at least 360 sworn police officers assigned to patrol our streets (which is 136 more officers than we have today). That would bring the total sworn staff level of OPD to 785 officers. That is the minimum staffing level that I believe is necessary on the enforcement side of the public safety equation to help improve public safety in the City of Oakland.
  • 2. 2 3. OPDs difficulty in achieving the authorized sworn staffing level appears to be exacerbated by high attrition and low morale, as shown by the departments internal polling (http://tiny.cc/OPDPoliceSurvey) and its loss of officers only months after they complete their training. How should the City solve OPDs attrition and morale problems? My proposal to fully staff OPD, involves a three step approach, will reduce attrition, improve morale, and make OPD more cost efficient by reducing overtime costs. It includes: a) Immediately re-deploying 136 sworn officers from the 425 officers who are not currently assigned to patrols by increasing the Seargent/Lieutenant to Police Officer ratio from 1:4 to 1:13 until new police officers are hired and eliminate mandatory overtime. b) Implement a Stick Approach for new recruits that requires a minimum four (4) year contractual commitment upon successful completion of academy and field training. At a training cost of $100,000, failure to fulfill their commitment, would require repayment of $25,000 for each year the commitment has not been met by the recruit. Repayment would come from the recruit or the hiring police agency that the officer is transferring to prior to being released from their contractual commitment. c) Implement a Carrot Approach for officers that live outside of Oakland and have been with the OPD for a minimum of four (4) years. They would be eligible to participate in a Work and Live in Oakland program, and provide them with a 10 year forgivable loan from the City of Oakland to use as a down payment to purchase a home in the City of Oakland. Failure to complete the commitment, would require repayment of $10,000 for each year the commitment has not been unmet by the police officer to stay in the City of Oakland. 4. OPD has been under Federal Court supervision for close to twelve years. While Oaklanders have repeatedly been told that the end is in sight, in late July, Judge Henderson stated that Oaklands disciplinary processes have violated Court orders, and that continuing the same practices will "undermine any confidence in the sustainability of the reforms that have been and continue to be achieved." Then, on August 14, the Judge criticized the Citys recent inability to sustain through arbitration an officer termination in connection with response to the Occupy Oakland protests. (Source: http://tiny.cc/ArbOrder.) The Court opined that Oakland could not be in compliance with two NSA tasks if internal investigations were inadequate and discipline is not consistently imposed. Many people believe the Monitor has repeatedly imposed requirements on Oakland that far exceed the literal requirements of the NSA, and that as a result of the Monitors shifting standards, Oakland may never be able to extricate itself from Court supervision. As a City Council member, to what extent would you be prepared to oppose continued and changing demands from the Monitor, and what is your plan to end the era of Court supervision? As a City Councilmember I would be prepared to encourage OPD to comply fully and completely with bringing itself into compliance with the NSA by completing the final two tasks that remain undone. Internal investigation that are in fact adequate and transparent and discipline that is consistently imposed is the only the OPD will begin to gain the trust of the greater Oakland community. I would also fiercely advocate that Monitor clarifying and clearly articulating what standards need to be meet in order for OPD to comply. Then as a member of City Council we should collectively hold the Monitor accountable for evaluating OPDs progress towards compliance based on those standards, allowing no room to waiver or leave it to the subjective interpretation of those standards by the Monitor. 5. According to the Public Works Department, Oakland is on an 85-year repaving schedule, meaning a street that is repaved today wont be repaved again for 85 years. Further, according to Public Works, maintaining the existing pavement condition on Oaklands streets would require an estimated $28 million annually, while the amount allocated annually has been less than $6 million in recent years. Sixty percent of the Citys curb ramps are non-compliant or non- existent. The total needed to rehabilitate Oakland streets is over $435 million. How do you plan to reverse the ongoing deterioration of our streets and sidewalks? If you are elected, when will Oaklanders see a difference? The simple answer is to grow the City of Oaklands general fund revenue. The adopted policy budget for FY 2014-2015 for the general fund was $449,875,422. With more $435 more than needed to rehabilitate Oakland streets and only $6 million dollars annually budgeted for this work, over the next ten years we will be over $375 million behind what is required. Oakland needs to develop a strategic plan which will grow retail development and as a result to grow our tax base by 10% annually. I would like to see ten (10%) percent, or $4.5 million annually to be set aside for approving our streets. Successfully implemented by 2024 we would have increased the budget by almost $19 million annually and rehabilitated all of Oakland streets in 20 years, in the year 2034. Oaklanders would begin to see a difference in only four (4) years as the budget for street repair would have grown 400% from $6 million to $24 million annually.
  • 3. 3 6. The extent to which the City faces unfunded liabilities and what should be done about them has been a contentious issue in recent years. As recently as last December, the City Administrator projected that for the three fiscal years beginning July 1, 2015, Oakland faces all-funds budget structural shortfalls totaling $795 million if it addresses its deferred capital expenses and deferred liabilities, and $342 million if it does not (Source: December 12, 2013 Update to Five-Year Financial Forecast, Attachment D, http://tiny.cc/5yrupdate.) Do you believe Oakland faces a financial shortfall, and if so, how will you address it if elected in November? As stated previously, the simple answer is to grow the City of Oaklands general fund revenue. The adopted policy budget for FY 2014-2015 for the general fund was $449,875,422. Oakland needs to develop a strategic plan which will grow retail development and as a result to grow our tax base by 10% annually. 7. Operation Ceasefire has been described as the centerpiece of Oaklands violent crime reduction effort. We