civpro session intervention

8/21/2019 Civpro Session Intervention

1/16

CIVPRO SESSION INTERVENTION/DISCOVERY

(INTERVENTION)

Nordic Asia Limited vs CA

Nordic Asia has no e!a interest in the case

Requirements for intervention:"a# it must be shown that the movant has legalinterest in the matter in litigation$and"%# consideration must be given as to whether theadjudication of the rights of the original parties maybe delayed or prejudiced, or whether or not theintervenors rights may be protected in a separateproceeding.

Petitioners &aied to meet %oth re'irements

Petitioners do not o*n the vesse+ %t mere, hod amort!a!e ien over it Conse'ent,+ *hatever -d!ment isrendered in the coection case a!ainst the vesse is not o& sch a direct and immediate character that the intervenor*od either !ain or ose %, direct e!a o.eration andeect o& the -d!ment

Assmin! -d!ment is rendered a!ainst the vesse+.etitioners are not .recded &rom .roceedin! *ith their&orecosre o& the vesse 0hie there is a chance that.etitioners *od not %e a%e &, to satis&, their caimsde to res.ondents .re&erred caims+ the eect is mere,indirect as it is contin!ent .on t*o eventaities1 2).etitioners %ein! a%e sccess&, to &orecose on thevesse$ and 3) the .roceeds o& the sae %ein! ins4cient tocover the oan amont It *od have %een dierent i&

.etitioners *ere the o*ners o& the vesse+ &or then

.etitioners ma, %e said to have a direct interest in the

case o& action .eaded+ as the e5ection o& the -d!ment*od %e im.emented on their .ro.ert,

The second re'isite &or intervention states thatconsideration mst %e !iven as to *hether the ad-dicationo& the ri!hts o& the ori!ina .arties ma, %e dea,ed or.re-diced+ or *hether or not the intervenors ri!hts ma, %e.rotected in a se.arate .roceedin! In the .resent case+

.etitioners ri!hts *ere aread, .rotected thro!h theire5tra-dicia &orecosre .roceedin!s There *as noe5i!enc, to !rant the intervention On the other hand+res.ondents ri!hts have %een nd, dea,ed or .re-diced%, the intervention The decision o& the RTC o& 6ania in&avor o& res.ondents+ rendered in Octo%er 78+ 29:;+ has notattained


2/16

Saandan vs S.s 6endo=a

The CA did not err in deni,in! the .etitioners motion &orcarie, .rovision

Section 3 Time to intervene The motion to intervene ma,%e


3/16

6actan?Ce% Internationa Air.ort Athorit, vs eirs o& Estanisao 6io=a

De


4/16

an a%sote ri!ht The stattor, res or conditions &or theri!ht o& intervention mst %e sho*n The .rocedre tosecre the ri!ht to intervene is to a !reat e5tent


5/16

HSIS VS NOCO6

ISSE1 0ON CA ERRED IN OLDINH TAT RESPONDENTAS RIHT TO INTERVENE

In the instant case+ records sho* that JENHSON trans&erredand assi!ned 3+8+ S6C Cass KAK shares tores.ondent+ as evidenced %, their 6emorandm o&

A!reement and Deed o& Assi!nment e5ected on A!st3+ 2999 0e reca that these shares o& stoc@ in 'estion*ere sod to JENHSON to satis&, the costs o& sit a*ardedto it %, the tria cort in its A.ri + 299B Order Cear,+res.ondent has an interest in the otcome o& the case%e&ore the tria cort The Cort o& A..eas+ there&ore+ didnot err in rin! that res.ondents motion &or intervention isin order


6/16

O4ce o& the Om%dsman vs Sison

0ON the O4ce o& Om%dsman has s4cient e!a interest*arrantin! its intervention in the .roceedin!s %e&ore the CAsince it rendered the s%-ect decision .rsant %e&ore theCA since it rendered the s%-ect decision .rsant to itsadministrative athorit,

RA 9;B

A 9;B itse& does not athori=e a .rivate com.ainant toa..ea a decision o& the disci.inin! athorit, Sections 7and B o& RA 9;B athori=e either .art, to a..ea in theinstances that the a* ao*s a..ea One .art, is the PNPmem%er?res.ondent *hen the disci.inin! athorit,im.oses the .enat, o& demotion or dismissa &rom theservice The other .art, is the !overnment *hen thedisci.inin! athorit, im.oses the .enat, o& demotion %t

the !overnment %eieves that dismissa &rom the service isthe .ro.er .enat, However, the government party that can appeal isnot the disciplining authority or tribunal whichpreviously heard the case and imposed the penaltyof demotion or dismissal from the service. Thegovernment party appealing must be the one that isprosecuting the administrative case against therespondent. Other*ise+ an anomaos sitation *i rest

*here the disci.inin! athorit, or tri%na hearin! thecase+ instead o& %ein! im.artia and detached+ %ecomes anactive .artici.ant in .rosectin! the res.ondent Ths+ in6atha,+ Mr v Cort o& A..eas+ decided a&ter Daco,co,+ theCort decared1

To %e sre *hen the resotions o& the Civi ServiceCommission *ere %ro!ht to the Cort o& A..eas+ the CiviService Commission *as incded on, as a nomina .art,As a 'asi?-dicia %od,+ the Civi Service Commission can

%e i@ened to a -d!e *ho shod detach himse& &rom cases*here his decision is a..eaed to a hi!her cort &or revie*

In instittin! HR No 237B+ the Civi Service Commissiondan!eros, de.arted &rom its roe as ad-dicator and%ecame an advocate Its mandated &nction is to hear anddecide administrative cases institted %, or %ro!ht %e&oreit direct, or on a..ea+ incdin! contested a..ointmentsand to revie* decisions and actions o& its o4ces anda!encies+ not to iti!ate

Cear,+ the O4ce o& the Om%dsman is not an a..ro.riate.art, to intervene in the instant case It mst remain .artiaand detached 6ore im.ortant,+ it mst %e mind& o& itsroe as an ad-dicator+ not an advocate

The O4ce o& the Om%dsman is not a third .art, *ho has ae!a interest in the administrative case a!ainst the.etitioner sch that it *od %e direct, aected %, the

-d!ment that this Cort had rendered It mst %eremem%ered that the e!a interest re'ired &or anintervention mst %e direct and immediate in characterLest it %e &or!otten+ *hat *as %ro!ht on a..ea %e&ore thisCort is the ver, Decision %, the O4ce o& the Om%dsmanPain,+ the O4ce o& the Om%dsman+ as an ad-dicator+and not an advocate+ has no e!a interest at sta@e in theotcome o& this Re 7 Petition"32#


7/16

Discover,

A6 No 87?2?89?SC Tria corts are directed to isse orders re'irin! .arties to

avai o& 6odes o& Discover, *ithin B da,s &rom the


8/16

Pa-aria!a vs CA

ISSE1 the isse is *hether the ta@in! o& .etitionersde.osition %, *ritten interro!atories is .ro.er nder thecircmstances o%tainin! in this case

Jt *hen vie*ed vis the severa .ost.onements made %,.etitioner &or the initia .resentation o& his evidence+ *e areo& the vie* that his timin! is+ in &act+ ss.ect The records%e&ore s sho* that .etitioner sto..ed attendin! thehearin!s a&ter .rivate res.ondent .resented his


9/16

Sime Dar%, Em.o,ees Association vs NLRC

0ON PETITIONERS REQEST GOR AD6ISSION SOLDAVE JEEN HRANTED AND TE EVIDENCE INCLDED

TEREIN SOLD AVE JEEN AD6ITTED JY TERESPONDENTS REPLY/OJMECTION 0AS NOT 6ADE NDEROAT

The s%mission that .etitioners Re'est &or Admissionshod have %een deemed admitted in their &avor a&terres.ondents had &aied to


10/16

Re.%ic vs Sandi!a%a,an

ISSE1 0ON the motion &or eave to


11/16

Dasmarinas Harments vs Re,es

Sim.e &acts

A case &or a sm o& mone,


12/16

YATT INDSTRIAL VS LEY

0ON TE DEPOSITIONS SOLD JE DISREHARDED ANDPRETRIAL SOLD JE SET INSTEAD

Avaia%iit, o& .ro.osed de.onent to testi&, in Cort not!ood caseU to -sti&, cort order that de.osition not %eta@en The ri!ht to ta@e statements (de.osition) and the ri!ht tose them in Cort have %een @e.t entire, distinct tmost &reedom is ao*ed in ta@in! de.osition$ restrictionsare im.osed .on their se De.osition is imited on, %, reevanc, and .rivie!e se o& de.osition in tria is circmscri%ed oo@in! to*ardsthe se o& ora testimon, *hen .ractica%e


13/16

Secrit, Jan@ vs CA

ISSE1 0ON HRANT OG 6OTION GOR PRODCTION ANDINSPECTION OG DOC6ENTS

Section 2 Re 3;

KSECTION 2 6otion &or .rodction or ins.ection$ order.on motion o& an, .art, sho*in! !ood case there&or+ thecort in *hich an action is .endin! ma, (a) order an, .art,to .rodce and .ermit the ins.ection and co.,in! or.hoto!ra.hin!+ %, or on %eha& o& the movin! .art,+ o& an,desi!nated docments+ .a.ers+ %oo@s+ acconts+ etters+.hoto!ra.hs+ o%-ects or tan!i%e thin!s not .rivie!ed+*hich constitte or contain evidence materia to an, matterinvoved in the action and *hich are in his .ossession+cstod, or contro$ or (%) order an, .art, to .ermit entr,.on desi!nated and or other .ro.ert, in his .ossession orcontro &or the .r.ose o& ins.ectin!+ measrin!+ srve,in!+or .hoto!ra.hin! the .ro.ert, or an, desi!nated reevanto%-ect or o.eration thereon The order sha s.eci&, thetime+ .ace and manner o& ma@in! the ins.ection andta@in! co.ies and .hoto!ra.hs+ and ma, .rescri%e schterms and conditions as are -stK

6ateriait, o& the S%-ect Docments

*/a0 The party must 1le a motion for the productionor inspection of documents or things, showing goodcause therefor2

/b0 !otice of the motion must be served to all otherparties of the case2

/c0 The motion must designate the documents,

papers, boo3s, accounts, letters, photographs,objects or tangible things which the party wishes tobe produced and inspected2

/d0 %uch documents, etc. are not privileged2

/e0 %uch documents, etc. constitute or containevidence material to any matter involved in theaction2 and

/f0 %uch documents, etc. are in the possession,custody or control of the other party.

Section 2 o& Re 3; cear, .rovides that the docmentsso!ht mst %e Kmateria to an, matter invoved in theactionK Res.ondents have sho*n that the s%-ectdocments are indeed materia to the .resent action

Indeed+ the &acta %ac@dro. o& the case stren!thensres.ondents case The civi action institted %, theS.oses , so!ht the annment o& t*o deeds o& ReaEstate 6ort!a!e %et*een Mac@ivi and .etitioner The,ae!ed, issed a S.ecia Po*er o& Attorne, to Res.ondent, to mort!a!e their .ro.ert, on, &or their %ene


14/16

So aso+ the additiona mort!a!e contracts e5ected %, Mac@ivi are materia to the .resent action Jecase a *itnesso& .etitioner admitted in cort that there *as a thirdmort!a!e contract %et*een Mac@ivi and the %an@+ &air .a,demands that herein res.ondents mst %e !iven the chanceto e5amine sch additiona mort!a!e contracts In so doin!+the, can determine *h, .etitioner *as !oin! a&ter their.ro.ert, *hich *as invaid, mort!a!ed %, Res.ondent ,+*hie the .ro.erties o& the acta %orro*er+ Mac@ivi+ have not%een toched or &orecosed %, the %an@Soid%an@ vs Hate*a,

ISSE1 0ON CA ERRED IN RLINH TAT JOT 6OTION GORPRODCTION OG DOC6ENTS AND TE OG TC GAILED TOCO6PLY 0IT SECTION 2 RLE 3;

(a) The .art, mst


15/16

$"#%&T! 45#R ()T! #R "!$&!' (""(6 >no*n as .er.etation o& testimon,

Antici.ator, in natre O%-ect is to .reserve testimon, &or &tre se I& .endin! a..ea+ eave o& cort necessar,

&!TRR#'(T#R&% T# "(RT&% Intended to com.e discosre &rom adverse .art,

ma, %e avaied o& %, eave o& cort a&ter -risdiction overthe de&endant is o%tained or over his .ro.ert, that iss%-ect o& the action OR *ithot eave o& cort a&ter an ans*er has %een served Eect o& &aire to serve *ritten interro!atories1 a .art, notserved *ith *ritten interro!atories ma, not %e com.eed%, the adverse .art, to !ive testimon, in o.en cort or to!ive de.osition .endin! a..ea Eect o& &aire to ans*er interro!atories Stri@in! ot o& .eadin!s Dismissa o& action Md!ment %, de&at (Re 39+ Sections 7(c) and B)

($7&%%!% 48 ($9R% "(RT&%

Avaia%e a&ter res.onsive .eadin! Pr.ose1 admission o& the !enineness o& an, materia andreevant docment or the trth o& an, materia and reevantmatter o& &act set &orth in the docment S%-ect o& admission is deemed admitted ness denieds.eci


16/16

Conse'ence o& re&sa1 .h,sica or menta stats o& .art,so!ht to %e e5amined as caimed %, the .art, re'estin!the e5amination sha %e deemed esta%ished Re'est %, .art, e5amined o& detaied *ritten re.ort o& e5amination *i mean *aiver o& .rivie!e in the said actionor an, other invovin! the same controvers,+ re!ardin! thetestimon, o& .erson *ho has e5amined or therea&tere5amine him in res.ect o& the same menta or .h,sicae5amination R5%(6 T# )#7"68 W&TH 7#$% #5 $&%)#9R8 Re&sa to ans*er an, 'estion .on ora e5amination1.ro.onent ma, a.., &or an order to com.e an ans*er(Re 39+ Section 2) Rest o& Re&sa to o%e, order o& cort1

6atters s%-ect o& the order sha %e ta@en as esta%ishedin accordance *ith the caim o& the .art, o%tainin! theorder (Re 39+ Section 7 (a)) Diso%edient .art, disao*ed to s..ort or o..osedesi!nated caims or .rohi%ited &rom introdcin! evidencematters s%-ect o& the discover, .rocedre (Re 39+Section 7 (%)) Stri@in! ot o& .eadin!s or .art thereo& (Re 39+ Section 7(c)) Sta,in! .roceedin!s nti o%e,ed (Re 39+ Section 7 (c)) Dismissin! action or .roceedin! (Re 39+ Section 7 (c)) Renderin! -d!ment %, de&at (Re 39+ Section 7 (c)) Arrest o& an, .art, diso%e,in! e5ce.t an order to s%mit toa .h,sica or menta e5amination (Re 39+ Section 7 (d))

civpro session intervention

Documents