classes engr oregonstate edu

Upload: hernan-garro

Post on 04-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Classes Engr Oregonstate Edu

    1/5

    Major Topics on this Page

    5.1 Measurement

    5.2 Measurement Techniques

    5 DEFLECTION

    Pavement surface deflection measurements are the primary means of evaluating a flexible pavement

    structure and rigid pavement load transfer. Although other measurements c an be made that reflect (to

    some degree) a pavement's st ructural condition, surface deflect ion is an important pavement

    evaluation method because the magnitude and shape of pavement deflection is a function of traffic

    (type and volume), pavement structural section, temperature affecting the pavement structure and

    moisture affecting the pavement structure. Deflection measurements can be used in backcalculation methods to determine pavement structural

    layer stiffness and the subgrade resilient modulus. Thus, many characteristics of a f lexible pavement can be determined by measuring its

    deflect ion in response to load. Furthermore, pavement deflect ion measurements are non-dest ructive.

    5.1 Measurement

    Surface deflec tion is measured as a pavement surface's vertical deflected distance as a result of an applied (either static or dynamic) load. The

    more advanced measurement devices record this vertical deflection in multiple locat ions, which provides a more complete characterization of

    pavement deflect ion. The area of pavement deflect ion under and near the load applicat ion is collectively known as the "deflect ion basin".

    5.2 Measurement Techniques

    There are three broad categories of nondestructive deflection testing equipment:

    Static deflections

    Steady state deflect ions

    Impact load deflections (FWD)

    The general principal is to apply a load of known magnitude to the pavement surface and analyze the shape and magnitude of the deflection

    basin to assess the strength of the pavement structure (see Figure 9.15).

    Figure 9.15: Deflection Measurement Schematic

    WSDOT Deflection Measurement Method

    WSDOT uses the FWD.

    WSDOT FWD Trailer

    5.2.1 Static Deflection Equipment

    Static deflection equipment measure pavement deflection in response to a static load.

    converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

    http://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDFhttp://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDFhttp://classes.engr.oregonstate.edu/cce/winter2012/ce492/Modules/04_design_parameters/04-2_body.htm#mrhttp://classes.engr.oregonstate.edu/cce/winter2012/ce492/Modules/06_structural_design/backcalculation.htm
  • 7/31/2019 Classes Engr Oregonstate Edu

    2/5

    5.2.1.1 Benkelman Beam

    The Benkelman Beam (see Figure 9.16), developed at the Western Association of State Highway Organizations (WASHO) Road Test in 1952, is a

    simple device that operates on the lever arm principle. The Benkelman Beam is used with a loaded truck - typically 80 kN (18,000 lb) on a single

    axle with dual tires inflated to 480 to 550 kPa (70 to 80 psi). Measurement is made by placing the tip of the beam between the dual tires and

    measuring the pavement surface rebound as the truck is moved away (see Figure 9.17). The Benkelman Beam is low cost but is also slow, labor

    intensive and does not provide a deflection basin.

    Figure 9.16: Benkelman Beam Schematic

    Figure 9.17: Benkelman Beam in Use

    Standard Benkelman Beam tests are described in:

    AASHTO T 256: Pavement Deflect ion Measurements

    ASTM D 4695: General Pavement Deflection Measurements

    5.2.2 Steady State Deflection Equipment

    Steady state deflect ion equipment measure the dynamic deflection of a pavement produced by an oscillating load. These devices consist of a

    dynamic force generator (that produces the oscillating load), a motion measuring instrument (to measure the oscillating load), a calibration unit

    and several deflect ion measuring devices (transducers, acc elerometers, seismometers, etc.). The main advantage that steady state deflect ion

    equipment offer over static deflect ion equipment is that they can measure a deflection basin. The most common steady state deflec tion

    equipment are the Dynaflect and the Road Rater.

    The stead state deflection equipment (see Figure 9.18) is stationary when measurements are taken with force generator (counter rotating

    weights) started and deflect ion sensors (transducers) lowered to the pavement surface. Figure 9.19 is a plot of a typical force output and

    Figure 9.20 shows the location of the equipment's loading wheels and five transducers. The equipment is most suitable for use on thinner

    pavements including low volume rural highways, county roads, municipal streets, and parking lots (IMS, 2001).

    converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

    http://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDFhttp://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDF
  • 7/31/2019 Classes Engr Oregonstate Edu

    3/5

    Figure 9.18: Dynaflect

    Figure 9.19: Dynaflect Force Output

    Figure 9.20: Standard Location of Dynaflect Loading Wheels

    and Transducers

    The Road Rater (see Figure 9.21) is the other popular type of steady state deflect ion equipment. It must also be stat ionary to start and

    operates in a similar fashion to the Dynaflect .

    converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

    http://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDFhttp://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDF
  • 7/31/2019 Classes Engr Oregonstate Edu

    4/5

    Figure 9.21: Road Rater

    Standard stead state deflection tests are described in:

    AASHTO T 256: Pavement Deflect ion Measurements

    ASTM D 4695: General Pavement Deflection Measurements

    5.2.3 Impact (Impulse) Load Response

    All impact load devices deliver a transient impulse load to the pavement surface. The subsequent pavement response (deflection basin) is

    measured by a series of sensors. The most c ommon type of equipment is the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) (see Figures 9.22 through9.26). The FWD can either be mounted in a vehicle or on a trailer and is equipped with a weight and several velocity transducer sensors. To

    perform a test , the vehicle is stopped and the loading plate (weight) is positioned over the desired locat ion. The sensors are then lowered to

    the pavement surface and the weight is dropped. Multiple tests c an be performed on the same location using different weight drop heights

    (ASTM, 2000). The advantage of an impact load response measuring device over a steady state deflection measuring device is that it is quicker,

    the impact load can be easily varied and it more accurately simulates the transient loading of traffic . Results from FWD tests are often

    communicated using the FWD AREA Parameter.

    Figure 9.22: FWD Impulse Loading

    Mechanism (foreground) and Sensors

    (background)

    Figure 9.23: FWD Figure 9.24: Dynatest 8000 FWD

    Figure 9.25: KUAB FWD Figure 9.26: JILS FWD

    The standard impact load response test method is:

    ASTM D 4694: Standard Test Method for Deflections with a Falling Weight Type Impulse Load Device

    converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

    http://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDFhttp://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDFhttp://www.jilsfwd.com/http://www.erikuab.com/http://www.dynatest.com/http://classes.engr.oregonstate.edu/cce/winter2012/ce492/Modules/09_pavement_evaluation/fwd_area.htm
  • 7/31/2019 Classes Engr Oregonstate Edu

    5/5

    5.2.4 Correlations Between Deflection Measuring Equipment

    In general, correlations between deflect ion devices should be used with caution. Too often, a correlation is developed for a specific set of

    conditions that may not be present for those using the correlation. It appears that the best approach is to obtain pavement parameters (such

    as layer moduli) from the spec ific device being used. However, that said, a few of many such correlations that have been developed follow.

    5.2.4.1 Benkelman Beam to FWD

    (based on unpublished data collected by the Washington State DOT Materials Laboratory in 1982-1983)

    BB = 1.33269 + 0.93748 (FWD)

    where: BB = Benkelman Beam deflection (inches x 10-3)

    FWD = FWD center-of-load deflection (inches. x 10-3) corrected

    to a 9,000 lb. load applied on a 11.8-inch diameter plate

    R2 = 0.86 Standard Error = 3.20 mils Sample Size = 713

    5.2.4.2 Benkelman Beam to Dynaflect

    (based on Hoffman and Thompson, 1981)

    BB = 20.63 (D)

    where: BB = Benkelman Beam deflection (inches x 10-3)

    D = Dynaflect center-of-load deflection (inches x 10-3)

    R2 = 0.72

    5.2.4.3 Benkelman Beam to Road Rater

    (based on Hoffman and Thompson, 1981)

    Comparing a Benkelman Beam load at 9,000 pounds on dual tires with 70-80 psi inflated tires and Road Rater at 8,000 pound peak-to-peak load

    at 15 Hz on a 12 inch diameter plate on a stabilized pavement:

    BB = 2.57 + 1.27(RR)

    where: BB = Benkelman Beam deflection (inches x 10-3)

    RR = Road Rater (Model 2008) center-of-load deflection at

    8,000 pounds and 15 Hz (inches x 10-3)

    R2 = 0.66

    The Western Direct Federal Division, Federal Highway Administration, Vancouver, Washington provides the following correlation for the Benkelman

    Beam to Road Rater Model 400:

    BB = 8.0 + 9.1026 (D0)

    where: BB = Benkelman Beam deflection (inches x 10-3)

    RR = Maximum deflection from Road Rater Model 400

    (deflection location between load pads) at a load of

    1,300 pounds at 25 Hz

    t d b W b2PDFC t

    http://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDFhttp://www.web2pdfconvert.com/?ref=PDFhttp://classes.engr.oregonstate.edu/cce/winter2012/ce492/Modules/09_pavement_evaluation/09-6_body.htmhttp://classes.engr.oregonstate.edu/cce/winter2012/ce492/Modules/09_pavement_evaluation/09-4_body.htm