classification of fusion categories and factorizable

89
Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications Classification of fusion categories and factorizable semisimple Hopf algebras Zhiqiang Yu Joint with Victor Ostrik Yangzhou University 2021. 8. 23

Upload: others

Post on 17-Feb-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Classification of fusion categories andfactorizable semisimple Hopf algebras

Zhiqiang YuJoint with Victor Ostrik

Yangzhou University

2021. 8. 23

Page 2: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

1 Motivations

2 Fusion category and braided fusion category

3 Main theorems

4 Applications

Page 3: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Motivations

M. Muger defined Morita equivalence of fusion categories[J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 2003], and proposed the minimalmodular extension conjecture [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc,2003].T. Lan, L. Kong, X. Wen studied the minimal extensionconjecture from the aspect of topological orders [Comm.Phys. Math, 2017].In [Adv. Math, 2011], P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, V. Ostrikdefined weakly group-theoretical fusion categories andsolvable fusion categories, which are closely related finitegroups, (quasi-)Hopf algebras.

Page 4: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Motivations

M. Muger defined Morita equivalence of fusion categories[J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 2003], and proposed the minimalmodular extension conjecture [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc,2003].T. Lan, L. Kong, X. Wen studied the minimal extensionconjecture from the aspect of topological orders [Comm.Phys. Math, 2017].In [Adv. Math, 2011], P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, V. Ostrikdefined weakly group-theoretical fusion categories andsolvable fusion categories, which are closely related finitegroups, (quasi-)Hopf algebras.

Page 5: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Motivations

M. Muger defined Morita equivalence of fusion categories[J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 2003], and proposed the minimalmodular extension conjecture [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc,2003].T. Lan, L. Kong, X. Wen studied the minimal extensionconjecture from the aspect of topological orders [Comm.Phys. Math, 2017].In [Adv. Math, 2011], P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, V. Ostrikdefined weakly group-theoretical fusion categories andsolvable fusion categories, which are closely related finitegroups, (quasi-)Hopf algebras.

Page 6: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Let K be a field, K = K, char(K) = 0.

DefinitionC is a finite tensor category if:

C ∼= Rep(A) as a K-linear abelian category, where A is af-d unital associative K-algebra, Rep(A) is the category off-d left A-modules.C = (C, I,⊗, ρ, λ, α) is a monoidal category, and −⊗− is aK-linear exact bifunctor.Every object X has a left dual X ∗ and right dual ∗X.I is a simple object.

DefinitionC is a fusion category, if it is a semisimple finite tensor category.

Page 7: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Let K be a field, K = K, char(K) = 0.

DefinitionC is a finite tensor category if:

C ∼= Rep(A) as a K-linear abelian category, where A is af-d unital associative K-algebra, Rep(A) is the category off-d left A-modules.C = (C, I,⊗, ρ, λ, α) is a monoidal category, and −⊗− is aK-linear exact bifunctor.Every object X has a left dual X ∗ and right dual ∗X.I is a simple object.

DefinitionC is a fusion category, if it is a semisimple finite tensor category.

Page 8: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Let K be a field, K = K, char(K) = 0.

DefinitionC is a finite tensor category if:

C ∼= Rep(A) as a K-linear abelian category, where A is af-d unital associative K-algebra, Rep(A) is the category off-d left A-modules.C = (C, I,⊗, ρ, λ, α) is a monoidal category, and −⊗− is aK-linear exact bifunctor.Every object X has a left dual X ∗ and right dual ∗X.I is a simple object.

DefinitionC is a fusion category, if it is a semisimple finite tensor category.

Page 9: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Let K be a field, K = K, char(K) = 0.

DefinitionC is a finite tensor category if:

C ∼= Rep(A) as a K-linear abelian category, where A is af-d unital associative K-algebra, Rep(A) is the category off-d left A-modules.C = (C, I,⊗, ρ, λ, α) is a monoidal category, and −⊗− is aK-linear exact bifunctor.Every object X has a left dual X ∗ and right dual ∗X.I is a simple object.

DefinitionC is a fusion category, if it is a semisimple finite tensor category.

Page 10: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Let K be a field, K = K, char(K) = 0.

DefinitionC is a finite tensor category if:

C ∼= Rep(A) as a K-linear abelian category, where A is af-d unital associative K-algebra, Rep(A) is the category off-d left A-modules.C = (C, I,⊗, ρ, λ, α) is a monoidal category, and −⊗− is aK-linear exact bifunctor.Every object X has a left dual X ∗ and right dual ∗X.I is a simple object.

DefinitionC is a fusion category, if it is a semisimple finite tensor category.

Page 11: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Let K be a field, K = K, char(K) = 0.

DefinitionC is a finite tensor category if:

C ∼= Rep(A) as a K-linear abelian category, where A is af-d unital associative K-algebra, Rep(A) is the category off-d left A-modules.C = (C, I,⊗, ρ, λ, α) is a monoidal category, and −⊗− is aK-linear exact bifunctor.Every object X has a left dual X ∗ and right dual ∗X.I is a simple object.

DefinitionC is a fusion category, if it is a semisimple finite tensor category.

Page 12: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Let K be a field, K = K, char(K) = 0.

DefinitionC is a finite tensor category if:

C ∼= Rep(A) as a K-linear abelian category, where A is af-d unital associative K-algebra, Rep(A) is the category off-d left A-modules.C = (C, I,⊗, ρ, λ, α) is a monoidal category, and −⊗− is aK-linear exact bifunctor.Every object X has a left dual X ∗ and right dual ∗X.I is a simple object.

DefinitionC is a fusion category, if it is a semisimple finite tensor category.

Page 13: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Let K be a field, K = K, char(K) = 0.

DefinitionC is a finite tensor category if:

C ∼= Rep(A) as a K-linear abelian category, where A is af-d unital associative K-algebra, Rep(A) is the category off-d left A-modules.C = (C, I,⊗, ρ, λ, α) is a monoidal category, and −⊗− is aK-linear exact bifunctor.Every object X has a left dual X ∗ and right dual ∗X.I is a simple object.

DefinitionC is a fusion category, if it is a semisimple finite tensor category.

Page 14: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Examples of fusion categories

Vec, the category of finite-dimensional vector spaces, withtensor product ⊗K over field K.Pointed fusion category VecωG, the category of G-gradedfinite-dimensional vector spaces category, where G is afinite group, ω ∈ Z 3(G,K∗) is a normalized 3-cocycle,K∗ := K\{0}. Explicitly, αVg1 ,Vg2 ,Vg3

= ω(g1,g2,g3) :

(Vg1 ⊗ Vg2)⊗ Vg3

∼→ Vg1 ⊗ (Vg2 ⊗ Vg3).Let G be a finite group, then Rep(G) is a fusion category.Let H be a f-d (quasi-)Hopf algebra, then Rep(H) is a finitetensor category. Rep(H) is a fusion category iff H issemisimple (quasi-)Hopf algebra.

Page 15: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Examples of fusion categories

Vec, the category of finite-dimensional vector spaces, withtensor product ⊗K over field K.Pointed fusion category VecωG, the category of G-gradedfinite-dimensional vector spaces category, where G is afinite group, ω ∈ Z 3(G,K∗) is a normalized 3-cocycle,K∗ := K\{0}. Explicitly, αVg1 ,Vg2 ,Vg3

= ω(g1,g2,g3) :

(Vg1 ⊗ Vg2)⊗ Vg3

∼→ Vg1 ⊗ (Vg2 ⊗ Vg3).Let G be a finite group, then Rep(G) is a fusion category.Let H be a f-d (quasi-)Hopf algebra, then Rep(H) is a finitetensor category. Rep(H) is a fusion category iff H issemisimple (quasi-)Hopf algebra.

Page 16: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Examples of fusion categories

Vec, the category of finite-dimensional vector spaces, withtensor product ⊗K over field K.Pointed fusion category VecωG, the category of G-gradedfinite-dimensional vector spaces category, where G is afinite group, ω ∈ Z 3(G,K∗) is a normalized 3-cocycle,K∗ := K\{0}. Explicitly, αVg1 ,Vg2 ,Vg3

= ω(g1,g2,g3) :

(Vg1 ⊗ Vg2)⊗ Vg3

∼→ Vg1 ⊗ (Vg2 ⊗ Vg3).Let G be a finite group, then Rep(G) is a fusion category.Let H be a f-d (quasi-)Hopf algebra, then Rep(H) is a finitetensor category. Rep(H) is a fusion category iff H issemisimple (quasi-)Hopf algebra.

Page 17: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Examples of fusion categories

Vec, the category of finite-dimensional vector spaces, withtensor product ⊗K over field K.Pointed fusion category VecωG, the category of G-gradedfinite-dimensional vector spaces category, where G is afinite group, ω ∈ Z 3(G,K∗) is a normalized 3-cocycle,K∗ := K\{0}. Explicitly, αVg1 ,Vg2 ,Vg3

= ω(g1,g2,g3) :

(Vg1 ⊗ Vg2)⊗ Vg3

∼→ Vg1 ⊗ (Vg2 ⊗ Vg3).Let G be a finite group, then Rep(G) is a fusion category.Let H be a f-d (quasi-)Hopf algebra, then Rep(H) is a finitetensor category. Rep(H) is a fusion category iff H issemisimple (quasi-)Hopf algebra.

Page 18: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Frobenius-Perron dimension

Definition (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)

Let Gr(C) be the Grothendieck ring of fusion category C. Thenthere exists a unique homomorphism FPdim(−) : Gr(C)→ Ksuch that FPdim(X ) is a positive algebraic integer, ∀X ∈ O(C).

Definition

The sum FPdim(C) :=∑

X∈O(C) FPdim(X )2 is defined as theFrobenius-Perron dimension of C.

Example

C = Rep(H), where H is a s.s (quasi-)Hopf algebra. ThenFPdim(X ) = dimK(X ) for X ∈ O(C). In particular,

FPdim(C) =∑

X∈O(C)

FPdim(X )2 = dimK(H)

Page 19: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Frobenius-Perron dimension

Definition (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)

Let Gr(C) be the Grothendieck ring of fusion category C. Thenthere exists a unique homomorphism FPdim(−) : Gr(C)→ Ksuch that FPdim(X ) is a positive algebraic integer, ∀X ∈ O(C).

Definition

The sum FPdim(C) :=∑

X∈O(C) FPdim(X )2 is defined as theFrobenius-Perron dimension of C.

Example

C = Rep(H), where H is a s.s (quasi-)Hopf algebra. ThenFPdim(X ) = dimK(X ) for X ∈ O(C). In particular,

FPdim(C) =∑

X∈O(C)

FPdim(X )2 = dimK(H)

Page 20: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Frobenius-Perron dimension

Definition (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)

Let Gr(C) be the Grothendieck ring of fusion category C. Thenthere exists a unique homomorphism FPdim(−) : Gr(C)→ Ksuch that FPdim(X ) is a positive algebraic integer, ∀X ∈ O(C).

Definition

The sum FPdim(C) :=∑

X∈O(C) FPdim(X )2 is defined as theFrobenius-Perron dimension of C.

Example

C = Rep(H), where H is a s.s (quasi-)Hopf algebra. ThenFPdim(X ) = dimK(X ) for X ∈ O(C). In particular,

FPdim(C) =∑

X∈O(C)

FPdim(X )2 = dimK(H)

Page 21: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Frobenius-Perron dimension

Definition (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)

Let Gr(C) be the Grothendieck ring of fusion category C. Thenthere exists a unique homomorphism FPdim(−) : Gr(C)→ Ksuch that FPdim(X ) is a positive algebraic integer, ∀X ∈ O(C).

Definition

The sum FPdim(C) :=∑

X∈O(C) FPdim(X )2 is defined as theFrobenius-Perron dimension of C.

Example

C = Rep(H), where H is a s.s (quasi-)Hopf algebra. ThenFPdim(X ) = dimK(X ) for X ∈ O(C). In particular,

FPdim(C) =∑

X∈O(C)

FPdim(X )2 = dimK(H)

Page 22: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Integral fusion categories

DefinitionA fusion category C is integral if FPdim(X ) ∈ Z, ∀X ∈ O(C).

Theorem (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)

A fusion category C is integral iff C ∼= Rep(H) for some s.squasi-Hopf algebra H.

DefinitionA fusion category C is weakly integral if FPdim(C) ∈ Z.

ExampleLet d ∈ Z≥3 be square-free. Then Tambara-Yamagami fusioncategory C := T Y(Zd , χ, ν) is weakly integral: O(C) = {X}∪Zd ,

X ⊗ X = ⊕g∈Zd g, g ⊗ X = X ⊗ g = X .

Page 23: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Integral fusion categories

DefinitionA fusion category C is integral if FPdim(X ) ∈ Z, ∀X ∈ O(C).

Theorem (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)

A fusion category C is integral iff C ∼= Rep(H) for some s.squasi-Hopf algebra H.

DefinitionA fusion category C is weakly integral if FPdim(C) ∈ Z.

ExampleLet d ∈ Z≥3 be square-free. Then Tambara-Yamagami fusioncategory C := T Y(Zd , χ, ν) is weakly integral: O(C) = {X}∪Zd ,

X ⊗ X = ⊕g∈Zd g, g ⊗ X = X ⊗ g = X .

Page 24: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Integral fusion categories

DefinitionA fusion category C is integral if FPdim(X ) ∈ Z, ∀X ∈ O(C).

Theorem (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)

A fusion category C is integral iff C ∼= Rep(H) for some s.squasi-Hopf algebra H.

DefinitionA fusion category C is weakly integral if FPdim(C) ∈ Z.

ExampleLet d ∈ Z≥3 be square-free. Then Tambara-Yamagami fusioncategory C := T Y(Zd , χ, ν) is weakly integral: O(C) = {X}∪Zd ,

X ⊗ X = ⊕g∈Zd g, g ⊗ X = X ⊗ g = X .

Page 25: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Integral fusion categories

DefinitionA fusion category C is integral if FPdim(X ) ∈ Z, ∀X ∈ O(C).

Theorem (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)

A fusion category C is integral iff C ∼= Rep(H) for some s.squasi-Hopf algebra H.

DefinitionA fusion category C is weakly integral if FPdim(C) ∈ Z.

ExampleLet d ∈ Z≥3 be square-free. Then Tambara-Yamagami fusioncategory C := T Y(Zd , χ, ν) is weakly integral: O(C) = {X}∪Zd ,

X ⊗ X = ⊕g∈Zd g, g ⊗ X = X ⊗ g = X .

Page 26: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Nilpotent fusion categories

Definition (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)Let C be a fusion category. The adjoint subcategory Cad of C isthe fusion category generated by object X ∈ O(C) such that

X ⊆ Y ⊗ Y ∗ for some Y ∈ O(C).

Definition (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)

Fusion category C is nilpotent, if C(n) = Vec, where C(0) := C,C(1) := Cad, C(m) := C(m−1)

ad , m ∈ Z≥1.

Example

Let G be a finite group, Z (G) the center of G, C = Rep(G).Then Cad = Rep(G/Z (G)). Thus, C is nilpotent iff G is nilpotent.

Page 27: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Nilpotent fusion categories

Definition (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)Let C be a fusion category. The adjoint subcategory Cad of C isthe fusion category generated by object X ∈ O(C) such that

X ⊆ Y ⊗ Y ∗ for some Y ∈ O(C).

Definition (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)

Fusion category C is nilpotent, if C(n) = Vec, where C(0) := C,C(1) := Cad, C(m) := C(m−1)

ad , m ∈ Z≥1.

Example

Let G be a finite group, Z (G) the center of G, C = Rep(G).Then Cad = Rep(G/Z (G)). Thus, C is nilpotent iff G is nilpotent.

Page 28: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Nilpotent fusion categories

Definition (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)Let C be a fusion category. The adjoint subcategory Cad of C isthe fusion category generated by object X ∈ O(C) such that

X ⊆ Y ⊗ Y ∗ for some Y ∈ O(C).

Definition (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)

Fusion category C is nilpotent, if C(n) = Vec, where C(0) := C,C(1) := Cad, C(m) := C(m−1)

ad , m ∈ Z≥1.

Example

Let G be a finite group, Z (G) the center of G, C = Rep(G).Then Cad = Rep(G/Z (G)). Thus, C is nilpotent iff G is nilpotent.

Page 29: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Nilpotent fusion categories

Definition (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)Let C be a fusion category. The adjoint subcategory Cad of C isthe fusion category generated by object X ∈ O(C) such that

X ⊆ Y ⊗ Y ∗ for some Y ∈ O(C).

Definition (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)

Fusion category C is nilpotent, if C(n) = Vec, where C(0) := C,C(1) := Cad, C(m) := C(m−1)

ad , m ∈ Z≥1.

Example

Let G be a finite group, Z (G) the center of G, C = Rep(G).Then Cad = Rep(G/Z (G)). Thus, C is nilpotent iff G is nilpotent.

Page 30: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Nilpotent fusion categories

Definition (ENO, Ann. of. Math, 2005)Let C be a fusion category. The adjoint subcategory Cad of C isthe fusion category generated by object X ∈ O(C) such that

X ⊆ Y ⊗ Y ∗ for some Y ∈ O(C).

Definition (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)

Fusion category C is nilpotent, if C(n) = Vec, where C(0) := C,C(1) := Cad, C(m) := C(m−1)

ad , m ∈ Z≥1.

Example

Let G be a finite group, Z (G) the center of G, C = Rep(G).Then Cad = Rep(G/Z (G)). Thus, C is nilpotent iff G is nilpotent.

Page 31: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Weakly group-theoretical fusion categories

Remark (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)Indeed, C is nilpotent iff there exist a series of fusionsubcategories C0 = Vec ⊆ C1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ Cn = C such that Cj is aGj -graded extension of Cj−1, where Gj are finite groups.

Theorem (ENO, Adv. Math, 2011)Let C be a fusion category.

C is group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(VecωG).C is weakly group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(D), where D is anilpotent fusion category.

Question (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)Are weakly integral fusion categories weakly group-theoretical?

Page 32: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Weakly group-theoretical fusion categories

Remark (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)Indeed, C is nilpotent iff there exist a series of fusionsubcategories C0 = Vec ⊆ C1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ Cn = C such that Cj is aGj -graded extension of Cj−1, where Gj are finite groups.

Theorem (ENO, Adv. Math, 2011)Let C be a fusion category.

C is group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(VecωG).C is weakly group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(D), where D is anilpotent fusion category.

Question (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)Are weakly integral fusion categories weakly group-theoretical?

Page 33: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Weakly group-theoretical fusion categories

Remark (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)Indeed, C is nilpotent iff there exist a series of fusionsubcategories C0 = Vec ⊆ C1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ Cn = C such that Cj is aGj -graded extension of Cj−1, where Gj are finite groups.

Theorem (ENO, Adv. Math, 2011)Let C be a fusion category.

C is group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(VecωG).C is weakly group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(D), where D is anilpotent fusion category.

Question (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)Are weakly integral fusion categories weakly group-theoretical?

Page 34: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Weakly group-theoretical fusion categories

Remark (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)Indeed, C is nilpotent iff there exist a series of fusionsubcategories C0 = Vec ⊆ C1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ Cn = C such that Cj is aGj -graded extension of Cj−1, where Gj are finite groups.

Theorem (ENO, Adv. Math, 2011)Let C be a fusion category.

C is group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(VecωG).C is weakly group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(D), where D is anilpotent fusion category.

Question (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)Are weakly integral fusion categories weakly group-theoretical?

Page 35: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Weakly group-theoretical fusion categories

Remark (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)Indeed, C is nilpotent iff there exist a series of fusionsubcategories C0 = Vec ⊆ C1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ Cn = C such that Cj is aGj -graded extension of Cj−1, where Gj are finite groups.

Theorem (ENO, Adv. Math, 2011)Let C be a fusion category.

C is group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(VecωG).C is weakly group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(D), where D is anilpotent fusion category.

Question (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)Are weakly integral fusion categories weakly group-theoretical?

Page 36: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Weakly group-theoretical fusion categories

Remark (S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, Adv. Math, 2008)Indeed, C is nilpotent iff there exist a series of fusionsubcategories C0 = Vec ⊆ C1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ Cn = C such that Cj is aGj -graded extension of Cj−1, where Gj are finite groups.

Theorem (ENO, Adv. Math, 2011)Let C be a fusion category.

C is group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(VecωG).C is weakly group-theoretical iff Z(C) ∼= Z(D), where D is anilpotent fusion category.

Question (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)Are weakly integral fusion categories weakly group-theoretical?

Page 37: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Frobenius property

Theorem (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)A weakly group-theoretical fusion category C admits Frobeniusproperty.That is, FPdim(C)

FPdim(X) is an algebraic integer, ∀X ∈ O(C).

RemarkIf the previous conjecture is true, then the Kaplansky’ssixth conjecture is true.Weakly group-theoretical property is invariant under takingDrinfeld centers, (de-)equivariantizations, G-extensions.

QuestionAre the Drinfeld centers of weakly integral fusion categoriesweakly group-theoretical?

Page 38: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Frobenius property

Theorem (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)A weakly group-theoretical fusion category C admits Frobeniusproperty.That is, FPdim(C)

FPdim(X) is an algebraic integer, ∀X ∈ O(C).

RemarkIf the previous conjecture is true, then the Kaplansky’ssixth conjecture is true.Weakly group-theoretical property is invariant under takingDrinfeld centers, (de-)equivariantizations, G-extensions.

QuestionAre the Drinfeld centers of weakly integral fusion categoriesweakly group-theoretical?

Page 39: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Frobenius property

Theorem (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)A weakly group-theoretical fusion category C admits Frobeniusproperty.That is, FPdim(C)

FPdim(X) is an algebraic integer, ∀X ∈ O(C).

RemarkIf the previous conjecture is true, then the Kaplansky’ssixth conjecture is true.Weakly group-theoretical property is invariant under takingDrinfeld centers, (de-)equivariantizations, G-extensions.

QuestionAre the Drinfeld centers of weakly integral fusion categoriesweakly group-theoretical?

Page 40: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Frobenius property

Theorem (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)A weakly group-theoretical fusion category C admits Frobeniusproperty.That is, FPdim(C)

FPdim(X) is an algebraic integer, ∀X ∈ O(C).

RemarkIf the previous conjecture is true, then the Kaplansky’ssixth conjecture is true.Weakly group-theoretical property is invariant under takingDrinfeld centers, (de-)equivariantizations, G-extensions.

QuestionAre the Drinfeld centers of weakly integral fusion categoriesweakly group-theoretical?

Page 41: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Frobenius property

Theorem (ENO. Adv. Math, 2011)A weakly group-theoretical fusion category C admits Frobeniusproperty.That is, FPdim(C)

FPdim(X) is an algebraic integer, ∀X ∈ O(C).

RemarkIf the previous conjecture is true, then the Kaplansky’ssixth conjecture is true.Weakly group-theoretical property is invariant under takingDrinfeld centers, (de-)equivariantizations, G-extensions.

QuestionAre the Drinfeld centers of weakly integral fusion categoriesweakly group-theoretical?

Page 42: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Braided fusion category

DefinitionFusion category C is a braided fusion category if there exists anatural isomorphism cX ,Y : X ⊗ Y ∼→ Y ⊗ X, X ,Y ∈ C satisfyingthe braiding equations.

Example

C = Rep(G), where the braiding c of Rep(G) is given bythe reflection τ of vector spaces. We call C a Tannakiancategory.C = Rep(G, z), where z ∈ Z (G) and z2 = 1, the braiding ofRep(G, z) is given by τ ◦ R with

R =12

(1⊗ 1 + z ⊗ 1 + 1⊗ z − z ⊗ z).

Page 43: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Braided fusion category

DefinitionFusion category C is a braided fusion category if there exists anatural isomorphism cX ,Y : X ⊗ Y ∼→ Y ⊗ X, X ,Y ∈ C satisfyingthe braiding equations.

Example

C = Rep(G), where the braiding c of Rep(G) is given bythe reflection τ of vector spaces. We call C a Tannakiancategory.C = Rep(G, z), where z ∈ Z (G) and z2 = 1, the braiding ofRep(G, z) is given by τ ◦ R with

R =12

(1⊗ 1 + z ⊗ 1 + 1⊗ z − z ⊗ z).

Page 44: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Braided fusion category

DefinitionFusion category C is a braided fusion category if there exists anatural isomorphism cX ,Y : X ⊗ Y ∼→ Y ⊗ X, X ,Y ∈ C satisfyingthe braiding equations.

Example

C = Rep(G), where the braiding c of Rep(G) is given bythe reflection τ of vector spaces. We call C a Tannakiancategory.C = Rep(G, z), where z ∈ Z (G) and z2 = 1, the braiding ofRep(G, z) is given by τ ◦ R with

R =12

(1⊗ 1 + z ⊗ 1 + 1⊗ z − z ⊗ z).

Page 45: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Braided fusion category

DefinitionFusion category C is a braided fusion category if there exists anatural isomorphism cX ,Y : X ⊗ Y ∼→ Y ⊗ X, X ,Y ∈ C satisfyingthe braiding equations.

Example

C = Rep(G), where the braiding c of Rep(G) is given bythe reflection τ of vector spaces. We call C a Tannakiancategory.C = Rep(G, z), where z ∈ Z (G) and z2 = 1, the braiding ofRep(G, z) is given by τ ◦ R with

R =12

(1⊗ 1 + z ⊗ 1 + 1⊗ z − z ⊗ z).

Page 46: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Muger centralizer

Definition (M. Muger, Adv. Math, 2000)Let C ⊆ D be braided fusion categories.The following braidedfusion category

D′C := {Y ∈ C|cY ,X cX ,Y = idX⊗Y ,∀X ∈ D}

is called the Muger centralizer of C in D. Denote the Mugercenter of C by C′ := C′C .

DefinitionLet C be a braided fusion category.

C is non-degenerate if C′ = Vec.C is slightly degenerate if C′ = sVec := Rep(Z2, z).C is symmetric if C′ = C.

Page 47: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Muger centralizer

Definition (M. Muger, Adv. Math, 2000)Let C ⊆ D be braided fusion categories.The following braidedfusion category

D′C := {Y ∈ C|cY ,X cX ,Y = idX⊗Y ,∀X ∈ D}

is called the Muger centralizer of C in D. Denote the Mugercenter of C by C′ := C′C .

DefinitionLet C be a braided fusion category.

C is non-degenerate if C′ = Vec.C is slightly degenerate if C′ = sVec := Rep(Z2, z).C is symmetric if C′ = C.

Page 48: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Muger centralizer

Definition (M. Muger, Adv. Math, 2000)Let C ⊆ D be braided fusion categories.The following braidedfusion category

D′C := {Y ∈ C|cY ,X cX ,Y = idX⊗Y ,∀X ∈ D}

is called the Muger centralizer of C in D. Denote the Mugercenter of C by C′ := C′C .

DefinitionLet C be a braided fusion category.

C is non-degenerate if C′ = Vec.C is slightly degenerate if C′ = sVec := Rep(Z2, z).C is symmetric if C′ = C.

Page 49: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Muger centralizer

Definition (M. Muger, Adv. Math, 2000)Let C ⊆ D be braided fusion categories.The following braidedfusion category

D′C := {Y ∈ C|cY ,X cX ,Y = idX⊗Y ,∀X ∈ D}

is called the Muger centralizer of C in D. Denote the Mugercenter of C by C′ := C′C .

DefinitionLet C be a braided fusion category.

C is non-degenerate if C′ = Vec.C is slightly degenerate if C′ = sVec := Rep(Z2, z).C is symmetric if C′ = C.

Page 50: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Muger centralizer

Definition (M. Muger, Adv. Math, 2000)Let C ⊆ D be braided fusion categories.The following braidedfusion category

D′C := {Y ∈ C|cY ,X cX ,Y = idX⊗Y ,∀X ∈ D}

is called the Muger centralizer of C in D. Denote the Mugercenter of C by C′ := C′C .

DefinitionLet C be a braided fusion category.

C is non-degenerate if C′ = Vec.C is slightly degenerate if C′ = sVec := Rep(Z2, z).C is symmetric if C′ = C.

Page 51: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Muger centralizer

Definition (M. Muger, Adv. Math, 2000)Let C ⊆ D be braided fusion categories.The following braidedfusion category

D′C := {Y ∈ C|cY ,X cX ,Y = idX⊗Y ,∀X ∈ D}

is called the Muger centralizer of C in D. Denote the Mugercenter of C by C′ := C′C .

DefinitionLet C be a braided fusion category.

C is non-degenerate if C′ = Vec.C is slightly degenerate if C′ = sVec := Rep(Z2, z).C is symmetric if C′ = C.

Page 52: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Muger centralizer

Definition (M. Muger, Adv. Math, 2000)Let C ⊆ D be braided fusion categories.The following braidedfusion category

D′C := {Y ∈ C|cY ,X cX ,Y = idX⊗Y ,∀X ∈ D}

is called the Muger centralizer of C in D. Denote the Mugercenter of C by C′ := C′C .

DefinitionLet C be a braided fusion category.

C is non-degenerate if C′ = Vec.C is slightly degenerate if C′ = sVec := Rep(Z2, z).C is symmetric if C′ = C.

Page 53: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Muger centralizer

Definition (M. Muger, Adv. Math, 2000)Let C ⊆ D be braided fusion categories.The following braidedfusion category

D′C := {Y ∈ C|cY ,X cX ,Y = idX⊗Y ,∀X ∈ D}

is called the Muger centralizer of C in D. Denote the Mugercenter of C by C′ := C′C .

DefinitionLet C be a braided fusion category.

C is non-degenerate if C′ = Vec.C is slightly degenerate if C′ = sVec := Rep(Z2, z).C is symmetric if C′ = C.

Page 54: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Example

Let C be a fusion category, then the Drinfeld center Z(C) isnon-degenerate.Let k = 4m + 2 ∈ Z≥2 and C := C(sl2, k + 2,q) withq2 = e

2πik+2 , then C is non-degenerate, while Cad is slightly

degenerate.

Theorem (P. Deligne, Moscow Math. J, 2002)Any symmetric fusion category C is braided equivalent toRep(G, z). In particular, C contains a maximal Tannakiansubcategory Rep(G/〈z〉).

Page 55: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Example

Let C be a fusion category, then the Drinfeld center Z(C) isnon-degenerate.Let k = 4m + 2 ∈ Z≥2 and C := C(sl2, k + 2,q) withq2 = e

2πik+2 , then C is non-degenerate, while Cad is slightly

degenerate.

Theorem (P. Deligne, Moscow Math. J, 2002)Any symmetric fusion category C is braided equivalent toRep(G, z). In particular, C contains a maximal Tannakiansubcategory Rep(G/〈z〉).

Page 56: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Example

Let C be a fusion category, then the Drinfeld center Z(C) isnon-degenerate.Let k = 4m + 2 ∈ Z≥2 and C := C(sl2, k + 2,q) withq2 = e

2πik+2 , then C is non-degenerate, while Cad is slightly

degenerate.

Theorem (P. Deligne, Moscow Math. J, 2002)Any symmetric fusion category C is braided equivalent toRep(G, z). In particular, C contains a maximal Tannakiansubcategory Rep(G/〈z〉).

Page 57: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

DefinitionLet G be a finite abelian group. η : G→ K∗ is a quadratic formon G, if

η(g) = η(g−1), ∀g ∈ G,

B(g,h) := η(gh)η(g)η(h) defines a symmetric bi-character.

η is non-degenerate if B(−,−) is.

Theorem (A. Joyal, R. Street, Adv. Math, 1993)There exists a bijective correspondence between metric groupsand pointed non-degenerate fusion categories.

We denote the category determined by metric group (G, η) byC(G, η) below.

Page 58: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

DefinitionLet G be a finite abelian group. η : G→ K∗ is a quadratic formon G, if

η(g) = η(g−1), ∀g ∈ G,

B(g,h) := η(gh)η(g)η(h) defines a symmetric bi-character.

η is non-degenerate if B(−,−) is.

Theorem (A. Joyal, R. Street, Adv. Math, 1993)There exists a bijective correspondence between metric groupsand pointed non-degenerate fusion categories.

We denote the category determined by metric group (G, η) byC(G, η) below.

Page 59: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

DefinitionLet G be a finite abelian group. η : G→ K∗ is a quadratic formon G, if

η(g) = η(g−1), ∀g ∈ G,

B(g,h) := η(gh)η(g)η(h) defines a symmetric bi-character.

η is non-degenerate if B(−,−) is.

Theorem (A. Joyal, R. Street, Adv. Math, 1993)There exists a bijective correspondence between metric groupsand pointed non-degenerate fusion categories.

We denote the category determined by metric group (G, η) byC(G, η) below.

Page 60: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

DefinitionLet G be a finite abelian group. η : G→ K∗ is a quadratic formon G, if

η(g) = η(g−1), ∀g ∈ G,

B(g,h) := η(gh)η(g)η(h) defines a symmetric bi-character.

η is non-degenerate if B(−,−) is.

Theorem (A. Joyal, R. Street, Adv. Math, 1993)There exists a bijective correspondence between metric groupsand pointed non-degenerate fusion categories.

We denote the category determined by metric group (G, η) byC(G, η) below.

Page 61: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

DefinitionLet G be a finite abelian group. η : G→ K∗ is a quadratic formon G, if

η(g) = η(g−1), ∀g ∈ G,

B(g,h) := η(gh)η(g)η(h) defines a symmetric bi-character.

η is non-degenerate if B(−,−) is.

Theorem (A. Joyal, R. Street, Adv. Math, 1993)There exists a bijective correspondence between metric groupsand pointed non-degenerate fusion categories.

We denote the category determined by metric group (G, η) byC(G, η) below.

Page 62: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

DefinitionLet G be a finite abelian group. η : G→ K∗ is a quadratic formon G, if

η(g) = η(g−1), ∀g ∈ G,

B(g,h) := η(gh)η(g)η(h) defines a symmetric bi-character.

η is non-degenerate if B(−,−) is.

Theorem (A. Joyal, R. Street, Adv. Math, 1993)There exists a bijective correspondence between metric groupsand pointed non-degenerate fusion categories.

We denote the category determined by metric group (G, η) byC(G, η) below.

Page 63: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Main theorem

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Let n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. Assume that Cis a non-degenerate fusion category with FPdim(C) = nd. If

C contains a Tannakian category E := Rep(G) such that(E ′C)G

∼= A� C(Zd , η) as braided fusion category,(FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 for all X ∈ O(C),

then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C as braided fusion category.

Remark(E ′C)G is the de-equivariantization of E ′C by E .The condition (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 is necessary. AssumeC := T Y(Zd , χ, µ)Z2 , then C contains two simple objects ofFP-dimension

√d, but C does not contain C(Zd , η).

Page 64: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Main theorem

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Let n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. Assume that Cis a non-degenerate fusion category with FPdim(C) = nd. If

C contains a Tannakian category E := Rep(G) such that(E ′C)G

∼= A� C(Zd , η) as braided fusion category,(FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 for all X ∈ O(C),

then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C as braided fusion category.

Remark(E ′C)G is the de-equivariantization of E ′C by E .The condition (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 is necessary. AssumeC := T Y(Zd , χ, µ)Z2 , then C contains two simple objects ofFP-dimension

√d, but C does not contain C(Zd , η).

Page 65: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Main theorem

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Let n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. Assume that Cis a non-degenerate fusion category with FPdim(C) = nd. If

C contains a Tannakian category E := Rep(G) such that(E ′C)G

∼= A� C(Zd , η) as braided fusion category,(FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 for all X ∈ O(C),

then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C as braided fusion category.

Remark(E ′C)G is the de-equivariantization of E ′C by E .The condition (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 is necessary. AssumeC := T Y(Zd , χ, µ)Z2 , then C contains two simple objects ofFP-dimension

√d, but C does not contain C(Zd , η).

Page 66: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Main theorem

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Let n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. Assume that Cis a non-degenerate fusion category with FPdim(C) = nd. If

C contains a Tannakian category E := Rep(G) such that(E ′C)G

∼= A� C(Zd , η) as braided fusion category,(FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 for all X ∈ O(C),

then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C as braided fusion category.

Remark(E ′C)G is the de-equivariantization of E ′C by E .The condition (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 is necessary. AssumeC := T Y(Zd , χ, µ)Z2 , then C contains two simple objects ofFP-dimension

√d, but C does not contain C(Zd , η).

Page 67: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Main theorem

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Let n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. Assume that Cis a non-degenerate fusion category with FPdim(C) = nd. If

C contains a Tannakian category E := Rep(G) such that(E ′C)G

∼= A� C(Zd , η) as braided fusion category,(FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 for all X ∈ O(C),

then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C as braided fusion category.

Remark(E ′C)G is the de-equivariantization of E ′C by E .The condition (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 is necessary. AssumeC := T Y(Zd , χ, µ)Z2 , then C contains two simple objects ofFP-dimension

√d, but C does not contain C(Zd , η).

Page 68: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Main theorem

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Let n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. Assume that Cis a non-degenerate fusion category with FPdim(C) = nd. If

C contains a Tannakian category E := Rep(G) such that(E ′C)G

∼= A� C(Zd , η) as braided fusion category,(FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 for all X ∈ O(C),

then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C as braided fusion category.

Remark(E ′C)G is the de-equivariantization of E ′C by E .The condition (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 is necessary. AssumeC := T Y(Zd , χ, µ)Z2 , then C contains two simple objects ofFP-dimension

√d, but C does not contain C(Zd , η).

Page 69: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Main theorem

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Let n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. Assume that Cis a non-degenerate fusion category with FPdim(C) = nd. If

C contains a Tannakian category E := Rep(G) such that(E ′C)G

∼= A� C(Zd , η) as braided fusion category,(FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 for all X ∈ O(C),

then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C as braided fusion category.

Remark(E ′C)G is the de-equivariantization of E ′C by E .The condition (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1 is necessary. AssumeC := T Y(Zd , χ, µ)Z2 , then C contains two simple objects ofFP-dimension

√d, but C does not contain C(Zd , η).

Page 70: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be an integral non-degenerate fusion category withFPdim(C) = nd, n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free.

If C is weakly group-theoretical, there exists a braidedequivalence C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C ;If n = paqb, where p,q are primes, then C is solvable. Inparticular, C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .If n = pa, then C is nilpotent and group-theoretical.

RemarkThe subcase that n = pa with p being an odd prime was provedin [J. Dong, S. Natale, Algebr. Represent. Theory, 2018].

Corollary (Z. Yu, J. Algebra, 2020)

Braided fusion categories of FP-dimensions paqbd are weaklygroup-theoretical, p,q are primes and (pq,d) = 1.

Page 71: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be an integral non-degenerate fusion category withFPdim(C) = nd, n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free.

If C is weakly group-theoretical, there exists a braidedequivalence C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C ;If n = paqb, where p,q are primes, then C is solvable. Inparticular, C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .If n = pa, then C is nilpotent and group-theoretical.

RemarkThe subcase that n = pa with p being an odd prime was provedin [J. Dong, S. Natale, Algebr. Represent. Theory, 2018].

Corollary (Z. Yu, J. Algebra, 2020)

Braided fusion categories of FP-dimensions paqbd are weaklygroup-theoretical, p,q are primes and (pq,d) = 1.

Page 72: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be an integral non-degenerate fusion category withFPdim(C) = nd, n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free.

If C is weakly group-theoretical, there exists a braidedequivalence C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C ;If n = paqb, where p,q are primes, then C is solvable. Inparticular, C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .If n = pa, then C is nilpotent and group-theoretical.

RemarkThe subcase that n = pa with p being an odd prime was provedin [J. Dong, S. Natale, Algebr. Represent. Theory, 2018].

Corollary (Z. Yu, J. Algebra, 2020)

Braided fusion categories of FP-dimensions paqbd are weaklygroup-theoretical, p,q are primes and (pq,d) = 1.

Page 73: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be an integral non-degenerate fusion category withFPdim(C) = nd, n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free.

If C is weakly group-theoretical, there exists a braidedequivalence C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C ;If n = paqb, where p,q are primes, then C is solvable. Inparticular, C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .If n = pa, then C is nilpotent and group-theoretical.

RemarkThe subcase that n = pa with p being an odd prime was provedin [J. Dong, S. Natale, Algebr. Represent. Theory, 2018].

Corollary (Z. Yu, J. Algebra, 2020)

Braided fusion categories of FP-dimensions paqbd are weaklygroup-theoretical, p,q are primes and (pq,d) = 1.

Page 74: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be an integral non-degenerate fusion category withFPdim(C) = nd, n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free.

If C is weakly group-theoretical, there exists a braidedequivalence C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C ;If n = paqb, where p,q are primes, then C is solvable. Inparticular, C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .If n = pa, then C is nilpotent and group-theoretical.

RemarkThe subcase that n = pa with p being an odd prime was provedin [J. Dong, S. Natale, Algebr. Represent. Theory, 2018].

Corollary (Z. Yu, J. Algebra, 2020)

Braided fusion categories of FP-dimensions paqbd are weaklygroup-theoretical, p,q are primes and (pq,d) = 1.

Page 75: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be an integral non-degenerate fusion category withFPdim(C) = nd, n,d ∈ Z≥1, (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free.

If C is weakly group-theoretical, there exists a braidedequivalence C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C ;If n = paqb, where p,q are primes, then C is solvable. Inparticular, C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .If n = pa, then C is nilpotent and group-theoretical.

RemarkThe subcase that n = pa with p being an odd prime was provedin [J. Dong, S. Natale, Algebr. Represent. Theory, 2018].

Corollary (Z. Yu, J. Algebra, 2020)

Braided fusion categories of FP-dimensions paqbd are weaklygroup-theoretical, p,q are primes and (pq,d) = 1.

Page 76: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Minimal extension conjecture

Definition (M. Muger, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc, 2003)Let C be a braided fusion category. A non-degenerate fusioncategory D is a minimal extension of C if C ⊆ D and C′D ∼= C′.

RemarkIndeed, D is a minimal extension of C if and only if C ⊆ Dand FPdim(D) = FPdim(C)FPdim(C′).However, a braided fusion category may not admit aminimal extension (unpublished note by V. Drinfeld).

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be a slightly degenerate fusion category. If C is Wittequivalent to a weakly group-theoretical fusion category, then Cadmits a minimal extension.

Page 77: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Minimal extension conjecture

Definition (M. Muger, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc, 2003)Let C be a braided fusion category. A non-degenerate fusioncategory D is a minimal extension of C if C ⊆ D and C′D ∼= C′.

RemarkIndeed, D is a minimal extension of C if and only if C ⊆ Dand FPdim(D) = FPdim(C)FPdim(C′).However, a braided fusion category may not admit aminimal extension (unpublished note by V. Drinfeld).

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be a slightly degenerate fusion category. If C is Wittequivalent to a weakly group-theoretical fusion category, then Cadmits a minimal extension.

Page 78: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Minimal extension conjecture

Definition (M. Muger, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc, 2003)Let C be a braided fusion category. A non-degenerate fusioncategory D is a minimal extension of C if C ⊆ D and C′D ∼= C′.

RemarkIndeed, D is a minimal extension of C if and only if C ⊆ Dand FPdim(D) = FPdim(C)FPdim(C′).However, a braided fusion category may not admit aminimal extension (unpublished note by V. Drinfeld).

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be a slightly degenerate fusion category. If C is Wittequivalent to a weakly group-theoretical fusion category, then Cadmits a minimal extension.

Page 79: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Minimal extension conjecture

Definition (M. Muger, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc, 2003)Let C be a braided fusion category. A non-degenerate fusioncategory D is a minimal extension of C if C ⊆ D and C′D ∼= C′.

RemarkIndeed, D is a minimal extension of C if and only if C ⊆ Dand FPdim(D) = FPdim(C)FPdim(C′).However, a braided fusion category may not admit aminimal extension (unpublished note by V. Drinfeld).

Theorem (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)Let C be a slightly degenerate fusion category. If C is Wittequivalent to a weakly group-theoretical fusion category, then Cadmits a minimal extension.

Page 80: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Assume C′ = sVec and FPdim(C) = nd, where n,d ∈ Z, 2 - dand (n,d) = 1. If C is weakly group-theoretical, and for anyobject X ∈ O(A), (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1, where A is a minimalextension of C. Then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Assume C′ = sVec and FPdim(C) = nd, where n,d ∈ Z, 2 - dand (n,d) = 1. If C is integral and weakly group-theoretical,then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2015.0181; Z. Yu, J. Algebra,2020)

Assume C′ = sVec and FPdim(C) = pnd, where p is a prime,n,d ∈ Z and (n,d) = 1. If C is integral, then C is nilpotent andgroup-theoretical.

Page 81: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Assume C′ = sVec and FPdim(C) = nd, where n,d ∈ Z, 2 - dand (n,d) = 1. If C is weakly group-theoretical, and for anyobject X ∈ O(A), (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1, where A is a minimalextension of C. Then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Assume C′ = sVec and FPdim(C) = nd, where n,d ∈ Z, 2 - dand (n,d) = 1. If C is integral and weakly group-theoretical,then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2015.0181; Z. Yu, J. Algebra,2020)

Assume C′ = sVec and FPdim(C) = pnd, where p is a prime,n,d ∈ Z and (n,d) = 1. If C is integral, then C is nilpotent andgroup-theoretical.

Page 82: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Assume C′ = sVec and FPdim(C) = nd, where n,d ∈ Z, 2 - dand (n,d) = 1. If C is weakly group-theoretical, and for anyobject X ∈ O(A), (FPdim(X )2,d) = 1, where A is a minimalextension of C. Then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2105.0181)

Assume C′ = sVec and FPdim(C) = nd, where n,d ∈ Z, 2 - dand (n,d) = 1. If C is integral and weakly group-theoretical,then C ∼= C(Zd , η) � C(Zd , η)′C .

Corollary (V. Ostrik, Z. Yu, arXiv:2015.0181; Z. Yu, J. Algebra,2020)

Assume C′ = sVec and FPdim(C) = pnd, where p is a prime,n,d ∈ Z and (n,d) = 1. If C is integral, then C is nilpotent andgroup-theoretical.

Page 83: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Factorizable Hopf algebra

DefinitionLet (H,R) be a f-d quasi-triangular Hopf algebra over K. H isfactorizable if the Drinfeld map Φ : H∗ → H is an isomorphism,where Φ(f ) = (id⊗ f )(R21R).

Example

Drinfeld double (D(H),R) is factorizable, where H is a f-dHopf algebra and R =

∑i(1⊗ hi)⊗ (hi ⊗ ε).

(K[Zd ],Rm) is a factorizable Hopf algebra with

Rm :=∑

0≤i,j≤n−1

ζ−ijdn

g i ⊗ g−mj ∈ K[Zd ]⊗K[Zd ],

where ζd is a primitive d-root of unity, 2 - m and (m,d) = 1.

Page 84: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Factorizable Hopf algebra

DefinitionLet (H,R) be a f-d quasi-triangular Hopf algebra over K. H isfactorizable if the Drinfeld map Φ : H∗ → H is an isomorphism,where Φ(f ) = (id⊗ f )(R21R).

Example

Drinfeld double (D(H),R) is factorizable, where H is a f-dHopf algebra and R =

∑i(1⊗ hi)⊗ (hi ⊗ ε).

(K[Zd ],Rm) is a factorizable Hopf algebra with

Rm :=∑

0≤i,j≤n−1

ζ−ijdn

g i ⊗ g−mj ∈ K[Zd ]⊗K[Zd ],

where ζd is a primitive d-root of unity, 2 - m and (m,d) = 1.

Page 85: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Factorizable Hopf algebra

DefinitionLet (H,R) be a f-d quasi-triangular Hopf algebra over K. H isfactorizable if the Drinfeld map Φ : H∗ → H is an isomorphism,where Φ(f ) = (id⊗ f )(R21R).

Example

Drinfeld double (D(H),R) is factorizable, where H is a f-dHopf algebra and R =

∑i(1⊗ hi)⊗ (hi ⊗ ε).

(K[Zd ],Rm) is a factorizable Hopf algebra with

Rm :=∑

0≤i,j≤n−1

ζ−ijdn

g i ⊗ g−mj ∈ K[Zd ]⊗K[Zd ],

where ζd is a primitive d-root of unity, 2 - m and (m,d) = 1.

Page 86: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Remark (V. Farsad, A. Gainutdinov, I. Runkel, J. Algebra, 2019)In fact, a f-d (quasi-)Hopf algebra H is factorizable if and only ifRep(H) is non-degenerate.

TheoremLet H be a factorizable semisimple Hopf algebra. AssumedimK(H) = nd where (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. If Rep(H)is weakly group-theoretical, then H ∼= L× (K[Zd ],Rm).

RemarkFor factorizable s.s quasi-Hopf algebra H with same properties,we have H ∼= A× (Kω[Zd ],R), ω ∈ Z3(Zd ,K∗).

Page 87: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Remark (V. Farsad, A. Gainutdinov, I. Runkel, J. Algebra, 2019)In fact, a f-d (quasi-)Hopf algebra H is factorizable if and only ifRep(H) is non-degenerate.

TheoremLet H be a factorizable semisimple Hopf algebra. AssumedimK(H) = nd where (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. If Rep(H)is weakly group-theoretical, then H ∼= L× (K[Zd ],Rm).

RemarkFor factorizable s.s quasi-Hopf algebra H with same properties,we have H ∼= A× (Kω[Zd ],R), ω ∈ Z3(Zd ,K∗).

Page 88: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Remark (V. Farsad, A. Gainutdinov, I. Runkel, J. Algebra, 2019)In fact, a f-d (quasi-)Hopf algebra H is factorizable if and only ifRep(H) is non-degenerate.

TheoremLet H be a factorizable semisimple Hopf algebra. AssumedimK(H) = nd where (n,d) = 1 and d is square-free. If Rep(H)is weakly group-theoretical, then H ∼= L× (K[Zd ],Rm).

RemarkFor factorizable s.s quasi-Hopf algebra H with same properties,we have H ∼= A× (Kω[Zd ],R), ω ∈ Z3(Zd ,K∗).

Page 89: Classification of fusion categories and factorizable

Motivations Fusion category and braided fusion category Main theorems Applications

Thank you for your attentions !