climate change mitigation and adaptation in dairy production systems of the great lakes region
TRANSCRIPT
Matt RuarkDept. Soil Science, UW-Madison & UW-
ExtensionMolly Jahn
Dept. Plant Genetics, UW-Madison
Climate change mitigation and
adaptation in dairy production systems of
the Great Lakes region
Award Number: 2013-68002-
20525
University of Wisconsin-MadisonCornell UniversityPenn State UniversityUniversity of MarylandUniversity of ArkansasUniversity of MichiganUniversity of WashingtonNorth Carolina A&T StateUSDA-ARS labs (x3)Innovation Center for US DairyNational Agricultural Library
30 PIs, 13 Institutions, 5 years, one heartbeat
Where Are The Dairy Cows?
95% CH4
5% CH4
What percent of the methane comes out of the backend of the cow?
Short-term (change in knowledge) Greater understanding of where GHG emissions are the
greatest in the dairy production system, where they can be reduced, and which adaptation strategies can be implemented.
Medium-term (change in behavior) Management practices are implemented by farmers to
reduce GHG emissions and adapt to climate change.Long-term (change in condition)
Reduction in GHG emissions from dairy production systems
Dairy production systems are able to adapt to changes in climate
We have kept the focus on outcomes.
Measurement Cow, Manure, and Soil Database development
Modeling Process model comparison Identify climate change scenarios and impacts
Life Cycle Assessment System boundary definition & LC inventory database Coupling of LCA and process models
ExtensionEducation
Objective topics
Cow research has focused on feeding trials using isolation chambers
Cow research has focused on feeding trials using isolation chambers
Increasing the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) will increase methane per cow, but decrease methane per unit milk.
Use of Ca(OH)2 treated corn stover in the diet could lead to an increase in digestibility without affecting performance.
Can we improve the digestibility of fiber for win-win scenarios?
Water added to obtain 50% DMCa(OH)2 added at 7.0% of mix DM
Stover +H2O
Stover + Ca(OH)2
IVNDFD30, %
40.2 57.1
11
Treated stover had no effect on milk production and decreased methane per unit milk when at 15% of DM feed.
Ca(OH)2 corn stover % DM P-value
0 5 10 15 Linear Quadratic
Milk, kg/d32.4 33.9 28.5 33.6 0.80 0.24
CH4/Milk18.8 17.7 20.0 14.4 0.06 0.08
Preliminary data, Wattiaux et al., 2016
We are interested in following the effect of management through the dairy production system.
R1 D1 DL1 DS1* DL1+DS1* R2 L2 S2 L2+S20
5
10
15
20
25
30
Carbon Dioxide Storage Methane Storage Nitrous Oxide Storage
Carbon Dioxide Field Methane Field Nitrous Oxide Field
g C
O2-
eq/k
g ra
w m
anur
e
a
bb
a
b
c
b
Holly et al., In Review, 2016Contact Matt Ruark, [email protected] for details of this project
We have published the data in the Ag Data Commons.Holly, M.A., Larson, R.A., Powell, J.M., Ruark, M.D., and C. Barford. 2016. Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, and Ammonia Emissions from Digested and Separated Dairy Manure during Storage and Land Application. Ag Data Commons. (Embargoed)https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/carbon-dioxide-methane-nitrous-oxide-and-ammonia-emissions-digested-and-separated-dairy-0
Other feeding trialsPenn State has GHG studies on solid
manureWisconsin, Cornell, Penn State, and
USDA-ARS in Marshfield, WI have cropping system or manure application field trials
There are many, many other studies
Two scenarios: Large farm: 1500 cowsSmall farm: 150 cows
ModelsIFSMDayCENTApexDNDC
Our modeling team is conducting a systematic analysis of BMPs on GHG, N, and P across multiple agricultural models
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
IFSM4.1_dig.8 ManureDNDC v3_dig.17 CNCPS6.1 DayCent.6_dig APEX0806.7_dig
GW (k
g CO
2eq.
/ co
w /
d)
Manure - N2OManure - CH4Field - N2OField - CH4Barn_other - N2OBarn_other - CH4Barn_enteric - N2OBarn_enteric - CH4
Baseline conditionsLarge herd
Preliminary data, Olivier Joliet, Univ. Michigan, 2016
Beneficial Management Practices: Feed# Feed scenarios Characteristics0 Baseline
1 High corn silageThe amount of corn silage is increased and alfalfa/grass is reduced from a ratio of 1:1 to 3:1 in animal diets.
2 50% forage rationsLow forage rations (reduced from 65% to 50% DMI) fed to lactating cows with crop land adjusted to provide feed needed.
3 High NDF digestibility NDF digestibility of feeds is increased 2%.
4 High feed efficiency Feed efficiency is increased from about 1.5 to 1.65 kg milk/kg feed dry matter intake
5 High fat Supplemental fat in diet of lactating cows is increased from 0.4 to 0.9 kg/day per cow.
6 Reduced protein Diet protein of lactating cows is reduced from 17% to 14%.
A Combined feed Scenario A All BMPs 1 to 6 combined
B Combined feed Scenario B Same as A, except for 2, keep 65% forage
C Combined feed Scenario C Same as B with rye silage double cropped after corn silage.
Beneficial Management Practices: Manure & Soil/Crop Management
# Manure Management scenarios Characteristics0 Baseline
1 SeparationA separator is used to remove a portion of the manure solids, which are used for bedding
2 Digestion An anaerobic digester is used to create biogas and electricity used on the farm and digestate as a slurry.
3 Separation and digestion Manure separation and anaerobic digestion are both used.
4 Sealed with flareCovered manure storage with flare to burn biogas produced converting the CH4 to CO2
# Crop & field scenarios Characteristics0 Baseline1 Cover crop Annual grass cover crop following corn
2 Summer application Nine month manure storage with spring and early summer application -> N fertilizer reduced to 60 kg N/ha.
3 Rye double crop Winter rye crop established following corn silage harvest and harvested as silage in the spring.
4 Incorporated same day Manure incorporated into the soil the same day of application with N fertilizer use reduced to 40 kg N/ha.
5 No-till No-till establishment used for all crops with no incorporation of manure.
6 No-till with injectionNo-till establishment used for all crops with manure applied through subsurface injection; no N fertilizer used.
Based on evaluating all the individual BMPs, we then pared down into three realistic BMPs scenarios
# Overall combined feed, manure, crop scenarios
Characteristics
1 Overall strategy 1NDF digestibility =2%; feed efficiency +10% ; diet protein reduced to NRC minimum, anaerobic digester; manure solids are separated and used for bedding
2 Overall strategy 2 Same as 1 + no-till system with subsurface injection of manure.3 Overall strategy 3 Same as 2 + Low forage rations (50% of DMI)
We identified three BMP scenarios that reduce N and C losses and increase profitability of the system.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3
% in
crea
se in
net
retu
rn w
ith re
spec
t to
base
line
% fo
otpr
int a
void
ed w
ith re
spec
t to
base
line
Reactive N footprinti Carbon footprintl Net return
Preliminary data, Olivier Joliet, Univ. Michigan, 2016
http://wpsudev2.vmhost.psu.edu/virtualfarm/
http://wpsudev2.vmhost.psu.edu/virtualfarm/section/manure-processing-and-storage
http://wpsudev2.vmhost.psu.edu/virtualfarm/research/tags/manure
We have developed a Virtual Farm for a range of audiences
Built in 1970s to have a focus on international studies and agriculture
90 acres, 70 acres of usable land and a greenhouse
1990s ag program eliminatedIn 2010, the program was revitalized
through development of an aquaponics program
Vincent High School
Between 2013 and 2016, over 1,700 students have been exposed to career opportunities in agriculture and food science
School-to-school exchanges (408), field trips (240), volunteer experiences (12), FFA (3), and internships (2)
Seven teachers received training
Education objectives involve curriculum, mentoring, and collaboration
High school curriculum developed:Animal Science Food ScienceFood Science Intro to AgricultureEnvironmental Sci. Ag Career Leadership
Total Student Enrollment by Program Area:Urban Agriculture: 352Landscaping: 60Intro to Agriculture: 330 Food Science: 387Veterinarian Science: 120 Hort.: 399Animal Science: 487 Environ. Sci.: 369Agriculture Careers & Leadership: 386
Curriculum efforts have been a huge success.
On August 10th, MPS Superintendent officially approved the transformation of VHS into Vincent High School of Agricultural Sciences.
Questions?Comments?
Concerns?